When Should We Wean Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Immediate vs Gradual Brace Weaning Protocols in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Lack of evidence and consensus for brace weaning protocol in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) results in clinicians prescribing gradual weaning in the hope of avoiding curve deterioration after weaning. However, gradual weaning contributes to prolonged brace wear, which can affect spinal stiffness and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Objective

To determine whether gradual weaning results in better curve magnitude and truncal balance maintenance after brace weaning vs immediate brace removal for patients with AIS.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was an open-labeled randomized clinical trial commenced in April 2017 with 24-month follow-up completed in January 2023. Outcome assessors were masked to weaning protocol assigned. The study took place at a territory-wide tertiary scoliosis clinic serving the largest number of referrals in the local population. Patients with AIS ready to wean off of brace wear were eligible (402 were screened; 33 were excluded [15 for <18 hours/day of brace-wear compliance before weaning, 11 were treated with Milwaukee brace, and 7 declined to participate]; and 369 were included), and those who were treated with a custom molded thoracolumbosacral orthosis and had reached skeletal maturity were consecutively recruited.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to gradual weaning protocol (n = 176) with an additional 6 months of nighttime wear before completely stopping or immediate weaning protocol (n = 193) with immediate brace removal at recruitment.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Changes in major curve Cobb angle and truncal balance from the time of weaning to 6-month, 12-month, and 24-month follow-up. HRQoL was also assessed using the refined Scoliosis Research Society 22-item and EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaires.

Results

A total of 369 patients (mean [SD] age, 14.9 [1.1] years; 304 [83.4%] girls) were randomized with 284 (77.0%) completing 24-month longitudinal follow-up. Immediate and gradual weaning groups had no significant differences in change of major Cobb angle at postweaning 6-month (difference, -0.6°; 95% CI, -1.4 to 0.2; P = .17), 12-month (difference, -0.3°; 95% CI, -1.2 to 0.6; P = .47), and 24-month (difference, -0.3°; 95% CI, -1.2 to 0.7; P = .60) follow-up. The number of curve progression, nonprogression, and rebound cases were comparable (χ22 = 2.123; P = .35). Postweaning changes in truncal balance and HRQoL demonstrated no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions

Gradual weaning did not demonstrate superiority to immediate weaning with predefined criteria of Cobb angle and truncal balance maintenance and HRQoL after brace weaning. Gradual and immediate weaning achieved very similar maintenance of brace outcomes in AIS. We therefore recommend the consideration of immediate brace weaning, which aims to benefit patients with earlier time for increased exercises and activity level.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03329716.

Discontinuation of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a scoping review

PURPOSE

Brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is usually prescribed for 20-40° curves in patients with growth potential. The aim is to reduce the risk of curve progression during growth and to avoid the curve reaching a surgical threshold. Having as small a curve as possible at skeletal maturity will reduce the risk of curve progression during adult life. While evidence exists for brace treatment in AIS, there is disagreement on how and when to discontinue bracing. The purpose of this review was to investigate what criteria have been reported for initiating brace cessation and published weaning protocols and to look at estimates of the number of patients that may progress > 5 degrees after the end of growth.

METHODS

This scoping review summarizes existing knowledge on the best time to stop bracing in AIS patients, how to "wean," and what happens to spinal curves after bracing. Searches were carried out through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO in April 2022. A total of 1936 articles were reduced to 43 by 3 reviewers. Full papers were obtained, and data were extracted.

RESULTS

Weaning was most commonly determined by Risser 4 (girls) and 5 (boys). Other requirements included 2 years post-menarche and no growth in standing/sitting height for 6 months. Skeletal maturity assessed from hand and wrist radiographs, e.g., Sanders' stage; distal radius and ulnar physes, could determine the optimal weaning time to minimize curve progression. Complete discontinuation was the most common option at skeletal maturity; variations on weaning protocols involved gradual reduction of bracing over 6-12 months. Curve progression after weaning is common. The 12 studies reporting early curve progression after brace weaning found a mean Cobb angle progression of 3.8° (n = 1655). From the seven studies reporting early curve progression by > 5 degrees, there were 236/700 (34%) patients. There is limited information on risk factors to predict early curve progression after finishing brace treatment with larger curves, especially those over 40 degrees possibly having more chance of progression.

CONCLUSION

Curve progression after bracing cessation is a negative outcome for patients who have tolerated bracing for several years, especially if surgery is required. The literature shows that when to start brace cessation and weaning protocols vary. Approximately 34% of patients progressed by more than 5 degrees at 2-4 years after brace cessation or weaning. Larger curves seem more likely to progress. More research is needed to evaluate the risk factors for curve progression after brace treatment, defining the best time to stop bracing based on the lowest risk of curve progression and whether there is any benefit to weaning.

Effectiveness of bracing to achieve curve regression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Aims

To systematically evaluate whether bracing can effectively achieve curve regression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and to identify any predictors of curve regression after bracing.

Methods

Two independent reviewers performed a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to obtain all published information about the effectiveness of bracing in achieving curve regression in AIS patients. Search terms included "brace treatment" or "bracing," "idiopathic scoliosis," and "curve regression" or "curve reduction." Inclusion criteria were studies recruiting patients with AIS undergoing brace treatment and one of the study outcomes must be curve regression or reduction, defined as > 5° reduction in coronal Cobb angle of a major curve upon bracing completion. Exclusion criteria were studies including non-AIS patients, studies not reporting p-value or confidence interval, animal studies, case reports, case series, and systematic reviews. The GRADE approach to assessing quality of evidence was used to evaluate each publication.

Results

After abstract and full-text screening, 205 out of 216 articles were excluded. The 11 included studies all reported occurrence of curve regression among AIS patients who were braced. Regression rate ranged from 16.7% to 100%. We found evidence that bracing is effective in achieving curve regression among compliant AIS patients eligible for bracing, i.e. curves of 25° to 40°. A similar effect was also found in patients with major curve sizes ranging from 40° to 60° when combined with scoliosis-specific exercises. There was also evidence showing that a low apical vertebral body height ratio, in-brace correction, smaller pre-brace Cobb angle, and daily pattern of brace-wear compliance predict curve regression after bracing.

Conclusion

Bracing provides a corrective effect on scoliotic curves of AIS patients to achieve curve regression, given there is high compliance rate and the incorporation of exercises.

Effect of traditional rehabilitation programme versus telerehabilitation in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Telerehabilitation has become increasingly popular since the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) outbreak. However, studies are needed to understand the effects of remote delivery of spine treatment approaches.

OBJECTIVES

To verify and compare the effects of traditional rehabilitation programmes (in-person) and telerehabilitation (online) on the progression of scoliotic curvature in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis during the COVID-19 pandemic, and to verify the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility among patients and physiotherapists regarding both treatments.

METHODS

This is a cohort study (prospective analysis of 2 intervention groups: telerehabilitation (online) and traditional rehabilitation (in-person). A total of 66 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis were included. Recruitment was conducted through the Clinical Center in Scoliosis Care (January-December 2020). Participants were divided into 2 intervention groups: telerehabilitation (online) (n = 33) and traditional rehabilitation programme (in-person) (n = 33). Both groups also were supplied with a spinal orthopaedic brace. Scoliosis was confirmed by a spine X-ray examination (Cobb angle). Radiographic parameters measured were: Cobb angles (thoracic and lumbar). The method of Nash and Moe (thoracic and lumbar) was also evaluated based on the relationship between the vertebral pedicles and the centre of the vertebral body in the X-rays. Assessments were performed at baseline (T0) and after 6 months of the intervention protocol (T6). Patient and physiotherapist reports were evaluated on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the interventions.

RESULTS

Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis showed a significant decrease in the Cobb angle (main scoliotic curvature), with a 4.9° for the traditional rehabilitation programme and 2.4° for the telerehabilitation. Thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles did not show significant changes after the intervention in both groups or between groups. Thoracic and lumbar Nash and Moe scores scores also did not show significant differences after 6 months of in-person or telerehabilitation intervention, or between groups. The intervention by telerehabilitation was acceptable, appropriate, and feasible for patients and physiotherapists.

CONCLUSION

Use of the rehabilitation programme for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis, delivered via telerehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic, was encouraging for future applications due to the improved effect on reducing the Cobb angle, preventing progression of scoliosis. In addition, telerehabilitation showed good acceptability among patients and physiotherapists. Traditional rehabilitation programmes (in-person) in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis also showed a reduction in the Cobb angle.

Is there a skeletal age index that can predict accurate curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis requires clinical and radiographic evaluation; the management options vary depending on the severity of the curve and potential for progression. Identifying predictors of scoliosis progression is crucial to avoid incorrect management; clinical and radiographic factors have been studied as potential predictors. The present study aims to review the literature on radiological indexes for the peak height velocity or curve acceleration phase to help clinicians manage treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

METHODS

This systematic review was carried out in accordance with Preferential Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search was carried out including only peer-reviewed articles written in English that described the radiological indexes assessing skeletal maturity in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and evaluated their correlation with curve progression, expressed as peak height velocity and/or curve acceleartion phase.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included and showed promising results in terms of reliable radiological indexes. Risser staging gives a general measure of skeletal maturity, but it cannot be used as a primary index for driving the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis since more reliable indexes are available.

CONCLUSION

Skeletal maturity quantification for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis has the potential to significantly modify disease management. However, idiopathic scoliosis is a complex and multifactorial disease: therefore, it is unlikely that a single index will ever be sufficient to predict its evolution. Therefore, as more adolescent idiopathic scoliosis progression-associated indexes are identified, a collective scientific effort should be made to develop a therapeutic strategy based on reliable and reproducible algorithms.

Directed Versus Nondirected Standing Postures in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Its Impact on Curve Magnitude, Alignment, and Clinical Decision-Making

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the difference in major curve Cobb angle and alignment between directed and nondirected positioning for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to evaluate implications on treatment decision-making.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Proper positioning of patients with spinal deformities is important for assessing usual functional posture in standing, so management strategies can be customized accordingly. Whether postural variability affects coronal and sagittal radiologic parameters and the impact of posture on management decisions remains unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis presenting for an initial consultation at a tertiary scoliosis clinic were recruited. They were asked to stand in two positions: passive, nondirected position; and directed position by the radiographer. Radiologic assessment included major and minor Cobb angle, coronal balance, spinopelvic parameters, sagittal balance, and alignment. Cobb angle difference >5° between directed and nondirected positioning was considered clinically impactful. Patients with or without such differences were compared. Overestimation or underestimation of the major curve (at 25° or 40°) by nondirected positioning were examined due to its relevance to bracing and surgical indications.

RESULTS

This study included 198 patients, with 22.2% experiencing Cobb angle difference (>5°) between positioning. The major curve Cobb angle was smaller in nondirected than directed positioning (median difference: -6.0°, upper and lower quartile: -7.8, 5.8), especially for curves ≥30°. Patients with a Cobb angle difference had changes in shoulder balance ( P =0.007) when assuming a directed position. Nondirected positioning had 14.3% of major Cobb 25° underestimated and 8.8% overestimated, whereas 11.1% of curves >40° were underestimated.

CONCLUSION

Strict adherence to a standardized radiographic protocol is mandatory for reproducing spine radiographs reliable for curve assessment, as a nondirected position demonstrates smaller Cobb angles. Postural variation may lead to overestimation, or underestimation, of the curve size which is relevant to both bracing and surgical decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-II.

Does in-brace correction affect coronal spinal and thoracic cage parameters in individuals with idiopathic scoliosis? A retrospective cohort study

The aim of the study is to identify the effects of in-brace correction on coronal spinal and thoracic cage parameters in individuals with idiopathic scoliosis (IS). The coronal spinal parameters [Cobb angle, apical vertebral rotation (AVR), lateral trunk shift, coronal alignment, biacromial slope and pelvic asymmetry] and the thoracic cage parameters [T1- 12 height, T1-S1 height, thoracic transverse diameter, and apical vertebral body-rib ratio (AVB-R)] of 89 child and adolescent patients were measured on posterior-anterior full-spine radiographs at pre-brace and in-brace conditions using Surgimap software. The initial in-brace correction (IBC) was calculated as a percentage decrease in the Cobb angle on the in-brace radiographs. The mean IBC rate for the primary curve was 37% (range = 10-100%). In the in- brace condition, the Cobb angle (p<0.001), AVR (p<0.001) and lateral trunk shift (p<0.001) decreased significantly; no statistically significant difference was found in the biacromial slope (p=0.713) and the coronal alignment (p=0.074). The T1-12 height and the T1-S1 height increased significantly (p<0.001) whereas the thoracic transverse diameter and the AVB-R decreased significantly (p<0.001). Unlike IBC rate was below 30% as IBC rate was above 30%, the T1-12 height (p<0.001) increased and the AVB-R decreased (p<0.001). The bracing improved the lateral trunk shift, the AVB-R, the thoracic and spine heights, but decreased the thoracic transverse diameter. The thoracic cage parameters may be better when the IBC rate is above 30%.

Can the proximal humeral ossification system (PHOS) effectively guide brace weaning in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

PURPOSE

The proximal humeral epiphyses can be conveniently viewed in routine spine radiographs. This study aimed to investigate whether the proximal humeral epiphyseal ossification system (PHOS) can be used to determine the timing of brace weaning in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), as assessed by the rate of curve progression after brace weaning.

METHODS

A total of 107 patients with AIS who had weaned brace-wear at Risser Stage  ≥  4, no bodily growth and post-menarche  ≥  2 years between 7/2014 and 2/2016 were studied. Increase in major curve Cobb angle > 5° between weaning and 2-year follow-up was considered curve progression. Skeletal maturity was assessed using the PHOS, distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, Risser and Sanders staging. Curve progression rate per maturity grading at weaning was examined.

RESULTS

After brace-wear weaning, 12.1% of the patients experienced curve progression. Curve progression rate for weaning at PHOS Stage 5 was 0% for curves < 40°, and 20.0% for curves ≥ 40°. No curve progression occurred when weaning at PHOS Stage 5 with radius grade of 10 for curves ≥ 40°. Factors associated with curve progression were: Months post-menarche (p = 0.021), weaning Cobb angle (p = 0.002), curves < 40° versus ≥ 40° (p = 0.009), radius (p = 0.006) and ulna (p = 0.025) grades, and Sanders stages (p = 0.025), but not PHOS stages (p = 0.454).

CONCLUSION

PHOS can be a useful maturity indicator for brace-wear weaning in AIS, with PHOS Stage 5 having no post-weaning curve progression in curves < 40°. For large curves ≥ 40°, PHOS Stage 5 is also effective in indicating the timing of weaning together with radius grade ≥ 10.

Alternate In-Brace and Out-of-Brace Radiographs Are Recommended to Assess Brace Fitting and Curve Progression With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Follow-Up

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of missed curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing brace treatment with only in-brace follow-up radiographs, and to provide recommendations on when in-brace and out-of-brace should be obtained during follow-up.

METHODS

133 patients who had documented clinically significant curve progression during brace treatment or only when an out-of-brace radiograph were studied. Of these, 95 patients (71.4%) had curve progression noted on in-brace radiographs while 38 patients (28.6%) showed curve progression only after brace removal. We analyzed differences in age, sex, curve types, Risser stage, months after menarche, standing out-of-brace Cobb angle, correction rate, and flexibility rate between the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors contributing to curve progression missed during brace treatment.

RESULTS

There were no differences in initial Cobb angle between out-of-brace and in-brace deterioration groups. However, the correction rate was higher (32.7% vs 25.0%; P = .004) in the in-brace deterioration group as compared to the out-of-brace deterioration group. A lower correction rate was more likely to result in out-of-brace deterioration (OR 0.970; P = .019). For thoracic curves, higher flexibility in the curves was more likely to result in out-of-brace deterioration (OR 1.055; P = .045). For double/triple curves, patients with in-brace deterioration had higher correction rate (OR 0.944; P = .034).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients may develop curve progression despite good correction on in-brace radiographs. Those with higher flexibility and suboptimal brace fitting are at-risk. In-brace and out-of-brace radiographs should be taken alternately for brace treatment follow-up.

Post-Maturity Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Curves of 40° to 50°

BACKGROUND

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves of 50° to 75° are inclined to progress and are thus indicated for surgery. Nevertheless, the natural history of curves of 40° to 50° following skeletal maturity remains uncertain and presents a clinical dilemma. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, rate, and prognostic indicators of curve progression within this patient group.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of 73 skeletally mature patients with AIS. Following yearly or more frequent follow-up, patients were stratified as having no progression (<5° increase) or progression (≥5° increase). Those with progression were further differentiated as having standard progression (<2° increase/year) or fast progression (≥2° increase/year). Radiographic parameters (coronal balance, sagittal balance, truncal shift, apical translation, T1 tilt, apical vertebral wedging) and height were determined on skeletal maturity. Parameters that were significantly associated with progression were subject to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The average period of post-maturity follow-up was 11.8 years. The prevalence of progression was 61.6%. Among those with progression, the curve increased by a mean of 1.47° ± 1.22° per year, and among those with fast progression, by 3.0° ± 1.2° per year. Thoracic apical vertebral wedging (concave/convex vertebral height × 100) was more apparent in those with progression than in those without progression (84.1 ± 7.5 versus 88.6 ± 3.1; p = 0.003). Increased coronal imbalance (C7 plumb line to central sacral vertebral line) differentiated those with fast progression from others (16.0 ± 11.0 versus 8.7 ± 7.7 mm; p = 0.007). An ROC curve of height-corrected coronal balance demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.722, sensitivity of 75.0%, and specificity of 72.5% in identifying fast progression. An ROC curve of height-corrected coronal balance together with apical vertebral wedging to identify those with progression demonstrated an AUC of 0.746, with specificity of 93.7% and sensitivity of 64.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

While the majority of curves progressed, the average rate of progression was slow, and thus, yearly observation was a reasonable management approach. Upon validation in larger cohorts, apical wedging and coronal imbalance may identity patients suited for closer monitoring and early spinal fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

An Examination of the Number of Adolescent Scoliotic Curves That Are Braceable at First Presentation to a Scoliosis Service

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects between 0.5% and 5.2% of adolescents and is progressive in two-thirds of cases. Bracing is an effective non-operative treatment for AIS and has been shown to prevent up to 72% of curves from requiring surgery. This paper explores the presentation of AIS in the UK and identifies who would be suitable for bracing, as per guidelines published by the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) and British Scoliosis Society (BSS), through curve severity and skeletal maturity at presentation. There were 526 patients with AIS eligible for inclusion across three tertiary referral centres in the UK. The study period was individualised to each centre, between January 2012 and December 2021. Only 10% were appropriate for bracing via either SRS or BSS criteria. The rest were either too old, skeletally mature or had a curve size too large to benefit. By the end of data collection, 38% had undergone surgery for their scoliosis. In the UK, bracing for AIS is only suitable for a small number at presentation. Future efforts to minimise delays in specialist review and intervention will increase the number of those with AIS suitable for bracing and reduce the number and burden of operative interventions for AIS in the UK.

The natural history of curve behavior after brace removal in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review

PURPOSE

Brace treatment is the most common nonoperative treatment to prevent curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The goal of this review and analysis is to characterize curve behavior after completion of brace treatment and to identify factors that may facilitate the estimation of long-term curve progression.

METHOD

A review of the English language literature was completed using the MEDLINE (PUBMED) database of publications after 1990 until September 2020. Studies were included if they detailed a minimum of 1 year post-brace removal follow-up of AIS patients. Data retrieved from the articles included Cobb angle measurements of the major curves at "in-brace," weaning, and follow-up visit(s) for all patients described and for subset populations.

RESULTS

From 75 articles, 18 relevant studies describing a follow-up period of 1-25 years following brace removal were included in the analyses. The reviewed literature demonstrates that curves continue to progress after brace treatment is completed with three main phases of progression: (i) immediate (upon brace removal) where a mean curve progression of 7° occurs; (ii) short term (within five years of brace removal) where a relatively high progression rate is evident (0.8°/year); and (iii) long term (more than five years after brace removal) where the progression rate slows (0.2°/year). The magnitude and rate of curve progression is mainly dependent on the degree of curve at weaning as curves weaned at < 25° progress substantially less than curves weaned at ≥ 25° at 25 years.

CONCLUSION

Curves continue to progress after brace removal and the rate and magnitude of progression are associated with the curve size at weaning, with larger curves typically exhibiting more rapid and severe progression. This analysis provides physicians and patients the ability to estimate long-term curve size based on the curve size at the time of weaning.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Sex differences in musculoskeletal injury and disease risks across the lifespan: Are there unique subsets of females at higher risk than males for these conditions at distinct stages of the life cycle?

Sex differences have been reported for diseases of the musculoskeletal system (MSK) as well as the risk for injuries to tissues of the MSK system. For females, some of these occur prior to the onset of puberty, following the onset of puberty, and following the onset of menopause. Therefore, they can occur across the lifespan. While some conditions are related to immune dysfunction, others are associated with specific tissues of the MSK more directly. Based on this life spectrum of sex differences in both risk for injury and onset of diseases, a role for sex hormones in the initiation and progression of this risk is somewhat variable. Sex hormone receptor expression and functioning can also vary with life events such as the menstrual cycle in females, with different tissues being affected. Furthermore, some sex hormone receptors can affect gene expression independent of sex hormones and some transitional events such as puberty are accompanied by epigenetic alterations that can further lead to sex differences in MSK gene regulation. Some of the sex differences in injury risk and the post-menopausal disease risk may be "imprinted" in the genomes of females and males during development and sex hormones and their consequences only modulators of such risks later in life as the sex hormone milieu changes. The purpose of this review is to discuss some of the relevant conditions associated with sex differences in risks for loss of MSK tissue integrity across the lifespan, and further discuss several of the implications of their variable relationship with sex hormones, their receptors and life events.

"Will I Need a Brace?": likelihood of curve progression to bracing range in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Bracing treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is typically initiated in skeletally immature patients with primary curves greater than 25°. The goal of this study was to develop a model predicting a patient's likelihood of progressing to bracing treatment.

METHODS

All patients with AIS presenting to a large pediatric spine center with a primary curve below 25° and skeletally immature (Sanders stage 1-6) were included. A patient was considered to have progressed into the bracing range if their primary curve reached a 25° threshold prior to skeletal maturity. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to predict the likelihood of curve progression into bracing range.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients (71% female) were included in this study with an average presenting age of 13.2 ± 1.4 years. At presentation, 31 (17%) were pre-peak height velocity, 62 (34%) were at their peak height velocity, and 87 (48%) were in the late adolescent growth stage. The high-risk patient group was defined as Sanders 1-2 and curve size > 10 and < 25° or Sanders 3-6 and curve size > 20 but < 25°. Those in the high-risk group demonstrated an over 5 times higher risk of progression to bracing range when accounting for age, sex, and curve location (OR: 5.168, 95% CI: 2.212-12.071, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patient's curve magnitude and skeletal maturity can be used to predict their likelihood of curve progression to greater than 25° and thus require bracing treatment. Orthopaedic providers can consider earlier treatment interventions or stricter follow-up adherence for patients at high risk for progression.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3-retrospective cohort study.

The Utility of a Novel Proximal Femur Maturity Index for Staging Skeletal Growth in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

For growing patients, it is ideal to have a growth plate visible in routine radiographs for skeletal maturity assessment without additional radiation. The proximal femoral epiphyseal ossification is in proximity to the spine; however, whether it can be used for assessing a patient's growth status remains unknown.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty sets of radiographs of the spine and the left hand and wrist of patients with idiopathic scoliosis were assessed for skeletal maturity and reliability testing. Risser staging, Sanders staging (SS), distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, the proximal humeral ossification system (PHOS), and the novel proximal femur maturity index (PFMI) were used. The PFMI was newly developed on the basis of the radiographic appearances of the femoral head, greater trochanter, and triradiate cartilage. It consists of 7 grades (0 to 6) associated with increasing skeletal maturity. The PFMI was evaluated through its relationship with pubertal growth (i.e., the rate of changes of standing and sitting body height [BH] and arm span [AS]) and with established skeletal maturity indices. Longitudinal growth data and 780 corresponding spine radiographs were assessed to detect peak growth using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS

The PFMI was found to be correlated with chronological age (τ b = 0.522), growth rates based on standing BH (τ b = -0.303), and AS (τ b = -0.266) (p < 0.001 for all). The largest growth rate occurred at PFMI grade 3, with mean standing BH growth rates (and standard deviations) of 0.79 ± 0.44 cm/month for girls and 1.06 ± 0.67 cm/mo for boys. Growth rates of 0.12 ± 0.23 cm/mo (girls) and 0 ± 0 cm/mo (boys) occurred at PFMI grade 6, indicating growth cessation. Strong correlations were found between PFMI gradings and Risser staging (τ b = 0.743 and 0.774 for girls and boys), Sanders staging (τ b = 0.722 and 0.736, respectively), and radius (τ b = 0.792 and 0.820) and ulnar gradings (τ b = 0.777 and 0.821), and moderate correlations were found with PHOS stages (τ b = 0.613 and 0.675) (p < 0.001 for all). PFMI gradings corresponded to as young as SS1, R4, U1, and PHOS stage 1. Fair to excellent interrater and intrarater reliabilities were observed. PFMI grade 3 was most prevalent and predictive for peak growth based on ROC results.

CONCLUSIONS

The PFMI demonstrated clear pubertal growth phases with satisfactory reliability. Grade 3 indicates peak growth and grade 6 indicates growth cessation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of PFMI can benefit patients by avoiding additional radiation in skeletal maturity assessment and can impact current clinical protocol of patient visits. PFMI gradings had strong correlations with SS, DRU gradings, and Risser staging, and they cross-referenced to their established grades at peak growth and growth cessation. PFMI may aid in clinical decision making.

Supine correction index as a predictor for brace outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of morphological spinal parameters to predict the outcome of bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to establish a novel supine correction index (SCI) for guiding bracing treatment.

Methods

Patients with AIS to be treated by bracing were prospectively recruited between December 2016 and 2018, and were followed until brace removal. In all, 207 patients with a mean age at recruitment of 12.8 years (SD 1.2) were enrolled. Cobb angles, supine flexibility, and the rate of in-brace correction were measured and used to predict curve progression at the end of follow-up. The SCI was defined as the ratio between correction rate and flexibility. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was carried out to assess the optimal thresholds for flexibility, correction rate, and SCI in predicting a higher risk of progression, defined by a change in Cobb angle of ≥ 5° or the need for surgery.

Results

The baseline Cobb angles were similar (p = 0.374) in patients whose curves progressed (32.7° (SD 10.7)) and in those whose curves remained stable (31.4° (SD 6.1)). High supine flexibility (odds ratio (OR) 0.947 (95% CI 0.910 to 0.984); p = 0.006) and correction rate (OR 0.926 (95% CI 0.890 to 0.964); p < 0.001) predicted a lower incidence of progression after adjusting for Cobb angle, Risser sign, curve type, menarche status, distal radius and ulna grading, and brace compliance. ROC curve analysis identified a cut-off of 18.1% for flexibility (sensitivity 0.682, specificity 0.704) and a cut-off of 28.8% for correction rate (sensitivity 0.773, specificity 0.691) in predicting a lower risk of curve progression. A SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression (OR 0.4 (95% CI 0.251 to 0.955); sensitivity 0.583, specificity 0.591; p = 0.036).

Conclusion

A higher supine flexibility (18.1%) and correction rate (28.8%), and a SCI of greater than 1.21 predicted a lower risk of progression. These novel parameters can be used as a guide to optimize the outcome of bracing.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):495–503.

Curve type, flexibility, correction, and rotation are predictors of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing conservative treatment : a systematic review

AIMS

The aim of this study was to review the current evidence surrounding curve type and morphology on curve progression risk in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted by two independent reviewers on PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science to obtain all published information on morphological predictors of AIS progression. Search items included 'adolescent idiopathic scoliosis', 'progression', and 'imaging'. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were carefully defined. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool, and level of evidence for each predictor was rated with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. In all, 6,286 publications were identified with 3,598 being subjected to secondary scrutiny. Ultimately, 26 publications (25 datasets) were included in this review.

RESULTS

For unbraced patients, high and moderate evidence was found for Cobb angle and curve type as predictors, respectively. Initial Cobb angle > 25° and thoracic curves were predictive of curve progression. For braced patients, flexibility < 28% and limited in-brace correction were factors predictive of progression with high and moderate evidence, respectively. Thoracic curves, high apical vertebral rotation, large rib vertebra angle difference, small rib vertebra angle on the convex side, and low pelvic tilt had weak evidence as predictors of curve progression.

CONCLUSION

For curve progression, strong and consistent evidence is found for Cobb angle, curve type, flexibility, and correction rate. Cobb angle > 25° and flexibility < 28% are found to be important thresholds to guide clinical prognostication. Despite the low evidence, apical vertebral rotation, rib morphology, and pelvic tilt may be promising factors. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(4):424-432.

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Effectiveness of 3D-Printed Orthosis in the Management of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare clinical effectiveness and quality of life (QoL) of the 3D-printed orthosis (3O) and conventional orthosis (CO) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Using 3D printing technology to design and fabricate orthoses to manage AIS aiming to improve in-orthosis correction and patients' compliance that are considered essential factors of effective treatment. Clinical evaluation was conducted to study the effectiveness of this innovative method.

METHODS

Thirty females with AIS who met the criteria (age 10-14, Cobb 20-40°, Risser sign 0-2, ≤12 months after menarche) were recruited. Subjects were randomly allocated to the 3O group (n = 15, age 12.4, Cobb 31.8°) and CO group (n = 15, age 12.0, Cobb 29.3°). All patients were prescribed for full-time wearing (23 hours/d) and follow-up every 4 to 6 months until bone maturity. Compliance was monitored by thermosensors, while QoL was assessed using three validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

Comparable immediate in-orthosis correction was observed between 3O (-11.6°, P < 0.001) and CO groups (-12.9°, P < 0.001). In the QoL study via SRS-22r, the 3O group got worse results after 3 months in aspects of function, self-image, and mental health (-0.5, -0.6, -0.7, P < 0.05) while the CO group had worse results in aspects of self-image and mental health (-0.3, -0.3, P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in QoL assessments between groups. After 2 years of follow-up, 22 patients were analyzed with 4 dropouts in each group. Comparable angle reduction was observed in both groups (3O: -2.2°, P = 0.364; CO: -3.5°, P = 0.193). There was one subject (9.1%) in the 3O group while two subjects (18.2%) in the CO group had curve progression >5°. Daily wearing hours were 1.9 hours longer in the 3O group than the CO group (17.1 vs. 15.2 hours, P = 0.934).

CONCLUSION

The 3O group could provide comparable clinical effects as compared with the CO group while patients with 3O showed similar compliance and QoL compared to those with CO.Level of Evidence: 1.

Diagnosis and conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) has a diagnosis rate of 3% to 5% per year, but the number of cases requiring surgical treatments is very small, accounting for only 0.17% to 1.75% of all AIS patients. Most patients with AIS are diagnosed, treated, and managed in outpatient clinics.Current Concepts: AIS is a disease that occurs more frequently, and progresses faster, in females than in males. Scoliosis deformity can occur due to various causes. To differentially diagnose AIS, it is necessary to perform careful physical examinations, investigate family history, and check for neurological, growth, and developmental abnormalities. Definitive diagnosis of AIS can be performed through radiographic imaging. In the case of atypical curvature and symptoms, examinations such as magnetic resonance imaging could be required in addition to radiographic imaging. Treatment of AIS patients in outpatient clinics can be performed through observation, exercise, and orthosis. The selection and application of treatment methods and the termination period of the treatments are complexly affected by the age at the time of diagnosis; pattern, location and size of the curve; and growth potential.Discussion and Conclusion: AIS is a disease in which good results can be obtained with conservative treatments such as exercise and orthosis, which is generally applied in an outpatient setting. To properly treat AIS, it is necessary to have an in-depth understanding of the characteristics of AIS, timing of treatment, and factors influencing treatment.

Does the Use of Sanders Staging and Distal Radius and Ulna Classification Avoid Mismatches in Growth Assessment with Risser Staging Alone?

BACKGROUND

Although Risser stages are visible on the same radiograph of the spine, Risser staging is criticized for its insensitivity in estimating the remaining growth potential and its weak correlation with curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Risser staging is frequently accompanied by other skeletal maturity indices to increase its precision for assessing pubertal growth. However, it remains unknown whether there is any discrepancy between various maturity parameters and the extent of this discrepancy when these indices are used concurrently to assess pubertal growth landmarks, which are important for the timing of brace initiation and weaning.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the chronologic order of skeletal maturity grades based on the growth rate and curve progression rate in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? (2) What are the discrepancies among the grades of each maturity index for indicating the peak growth and start of the growth plateau, and how do these indices correspond to each other? (3) What is the effectiveness of Risser staging, Sanders staging, and the distal radius and ulna classification in assessing peak growth and the beginning of the growth plateau?

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2017, a total of 13,536 patients diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were treated at our tertiary clinic. Of those, 3864 patients with a radiograph of the left hand and wrist and a posteroanterior radiograph of the spine at the same visits including initial presentation were considered potentially eligible for this study. Minimum follow-up was defined as 6 months from the first visit, and the follow-up duration was defined as 2 years since initial consultation. In all, 48% (1867 of 3864) of patients were eligible, of which 26% (485 of 1867) were excluded because they were prescribed bracing at the first consultation. These patients visited the subsequent clinics wearing the brace, which might have affected body height measurement. Six percent (117 of 1867) of eligible patients were also excluded as their major coronal Cobb angle reached the surgical threshold of 50° and had undergone surgery before skeletal maturity. Another 21% (387 of 1867) of patients were lost before minimum follow-up or had incomplete data, leaving 47% (878) for analysis. These 878 patients with 1139 skeletal maturity assessments were studied; 74% (648 of 878) were girls. Standing body height was measured in a standardized manner by a wall-mounted stadiometer. Several surgeons measured curve magnitude as per routine clinical consultation, skeletal maturity was measured according to the distal radius and ulna classification, and two raters measured Risser and Sanders stages. Reliability tests were performed with satisfaction. Data were collected for the included patients at multiple points when skeletal maturity was assessed, and only up to when brace wear started for those who eventually had bracing. The growth rate and curve progression rate were calculated by the change of body height and major coronal Cobb angle over the number of months elapsed between the initial visit and next follow-up. At each skeletal maturity grading, we examined the growth rate (in centimeters per month) and curve progression rate (in degrees per month) since the skeletal maturity assessment, as well as the mean age at which this maturity grading occurred. Each patient was then individually assessed for whether he or she was experiencing peak growth and the beginning of growth plateau at each timepoint by comparing the calculated growth rate with the previously defined peak growth rate of ≥ 0.7 cm per month and the beginning of growth plateau rate of ≤ 0.15 cm per month in this adolescent idiopathic scoliosis population. Among the timepoints at which the peak growth and the beginning of growth plateau occurred, the median maturity grade of each maturity index was identified as the benchmark grade for comparison between indices. We used the McNemar test to investigate whether pubertal growth landmarks were identified by specific maturity grades concurrently. We assessed the effectiveness of these skeletal maturity indices by the difference in proportions (%) between two benchmark grades in indicating peak growth and the growth plateau.

RESULTS

For girls, the chronological order of maturity grades that indicated peak growth was the radius grade, ulna grade, Sanders stage, and Risser stage. Curve progression peaked between the age of 11.6 and 12.1 years at a similar timing by all maturity indices for girls but was inconsistent for boys. For both sexes, radius (R) grade 6, ulna (U) grade 5, Sanders stage (SS) 3, and Risser stage 0+ were the median grades for peak growth, whereas Risser stage 4, R8/9, U7/8, and SS6/7 indicated the beginning of the growth plateau. The largest discrepancy between maturity indices was represented by Risser stage 0+, which corresponded to six grades of the Sanders staging system (SS2 to SS7) and to R6 in only 41% (62 of 152) of girls in the whole cohort. Despite Risser stage 0+ corresponding to the wide range of Sanders and distal radius and ulna grades, none of the R6, U5, SS3, and Risser stage 0+ was found more effective than another grade in indicating the peak growth in girls. R6 most effectively indicated the peak growth in boys, and Risser stage 0+ was the least effective. For the beginning of the growth plateau in girls, SS6/7 was the most effective indicator, followed by U7/8. Risser stage 4 was the least effective because it indicated 29% (95% CI 21% to 36%; p < 0.001) fewer patients who reached the beginning of the growth plateau than did those with R8/9. Risser stage 4 also indicated 36% (95% CI 28% to 43%; p < 0.001) fewer patients who reached the beginning of the growth plateau than those indicated by U7/8, and it identified 39% fewer patients than SS6/7 (95% CI 32% to 47%; p < 0.001). For boys, similarly, R8/9, U7/8, and SS6/7 were all more effective than Risser stage 4 in identifying when the growth plateau began.

CONCLUSION

Risser stage 0+ corresponds to a wide range of Sanders and distal radius and ulna grades. Risser stage 0+ is least effective in indicating the peak growth in boys, and Risser stage 4 is the least effective maturity grade for indicating when the growth plateau starts in both sexes. The concurrent use of R6 and SS3 can be useful for detecting the peak growth, and SS6/7 in conjunction with U7/8 is most effective in indicating the beginning of the growth plateau. Using a combination of specific grades of Sanders staging and the distal radius and ulna classification can indicate pubertal growth landmarks with reduced risk of underestimating or overestimating skeletal maturity. These findings may aid in refining clinical decision-making of brace initiation and weaning at a more precise timing. Among Risser stage 0, the appearance of R6, U5, and SS3 provide the most effective assessment of peak growth that can indicate the most effective bracing period within which curve progression occurs. For initiation of the growth plateau, Risser 4 is not useful, and SS6/7, R8/9 and U7/8 should be used instead.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Risk of Scoliosis Progression in Nonoperatively Treated Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Based on Skeletal Maturity

BACKGROUND

Hand radiographs for skeletal maturity staging are now frequently used to evaluate remaining growth potential for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Our objective was to create a model predicting a patient's risk of curve progression based on modern treatment standards.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all AIS patients presenting with a major curve <50 degrees, available hand radiographs, and complete follow up through skeletal maturity at our institution over a 3-year period. Patients with growth remaining underwent rigid bracing of curves >25 degrees, whereas patients between 10 and 25 degrees were observed. Treatment success was defined as reaching skeletal maturity with a major curve <50 degrees. Four risk categories were identified based on likelihood of curve progression.

RESULTS

Of 609 AIS patients (75.4% female) presenting with curves over 10 degrees and reaching skeletal maturity at most recent follow up, 503 (82.6%) had major thoracic curves. 16.3% (82/503) of thoracic curves progressed into surgical treatment range. The highest risk group (Sanders 1 to 6 and curve 40 to 49 degrees, Sanders 1 to 2 and curve 30 to 39) demonstrate a 30% success rate with nonoperative treatment. This constitutes an 111.1 times (95% confidence interval: 47.6 to 250.0, P<0.001) higher risk of progression to surgical range than patients in the lowest risk categories (Sanders 1 to 8 and curve 10 to 19 degrees, Sanders 3 to 8 and curve 20 to 29 degrees, Sanders 5 to 8 and curve 30 to 39 degrees).

CONCLUSIONS

Skeletal maturity and curve magnitude have strong predictive value for future curve progression. The results presented here represent a valuable resource for orthopaedic providers regarding a patient's risk of progression and ultimate surgical risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Impact of race on outcomes and healthcare utilization following spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

OBJECTIVES

Racial disparities in spine surgery have been shown to impact surgical management and postoperative complications. However, for adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated by posterior spinal fusion (PSF), the influence of race on postoperative outcomes remains unclear. The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in baseline patient demographics, inpatient management, and postoperative complications for adolescents with AIS undergoing elective, posterior spinal surgery (≥ 4 levels).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The Kids' Inpatient Database year 2012 was queried. Adolescent patients (age 10-17 years old) with AIS undergoing elective, PSF (≥ 4 levels) were selected using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification coding system. Patients were divided into 4 cohorts: Black, White, Hispanic, and Other. Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), discharge disposition and total cost were recorded. The primary outcome was the rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications and resource utilization after elective PSF intervention.

RESULTS

Patient demographics significantly differed between the four cohorts. While age was similar (p = 0.288), the White cohort had a greater proportion of female patients (White: 79.0%; Black: 72.1%; Hispanic: 78.2%; Other: 75.9%, p = 0.006), and the Black cohort had the largest proportion of patients in the 0-25th income quartile (White: 16.1%; Black: 43.3%; Hispanic: 28.0%; Other: 15.3%, p < 0.001). There were significant differences in hospital region (p < 0.001) and bed size (p < 0.001) between the cohorts, with more Hispanic adolescents being treated in the West (White: 21.9%; Black: 8.9%; Hispanic: 40.3%; Other: 29.3%) at small hospitals (White: 14.0%; Black: 13.9%; Hispanic: 16.2%; Other: 7.1%). Baseline comorbidities were similar between the cohorts. The use of blood transfusions was significantly greater in the Black cohort compared to the other racial groups (White: 16.7%; Black: 25.0%; Hispanic: 24.5%; Other: 22.7%, p < 0.001). The number of vertebral levels involved differed significantly between the cohorts (p < 0.001), with the majority of patients having 9-levels or greater involved (White: 80.9%; Black: 81.7%; Hispanic: 84.3%; Other: 67.3%). The rate of complications encountered during admission was greatest in the Other cohort (White: 21.9%; Black: 23.6%; Hispanic: 22.2%; Other: 34.9%, p < 0.001). While LOS was similar between the cohorts (p = 0.702), median total cost of admission was highest for Hispanic patients (White: $49,340 [37,908-65,078]; Black: $47,787 [37,718-64,670]; Hispanic: $54,718 [40,689-69,266]; Other: $54,110 [41,292-71,540], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that race may not have a significant impact on surgical outcomes after elective posterior spine surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Further studies are necessary to corroborate our findings.

Reproducibility and reliability analysis of the Luk Distal Radius and Ulna Classification for European patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

Current clinical and radiological methods of predicting a patient's growth potential are limited in terms of practicality, accuracy and known to differ in different races. This information influences optimal timing of bracing and surgical intervention in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The Luk classification was developed to mitigate limitations of existing tools. Few reliability studies are available and are limited to certain geographical regions with varying results. This study was performed to analyze reproducibility and reliability of the Luk Distal Radius and Ulna Classification in European patients.

METHODS

This is a radiological study of 50 randomly selected left hand and wrist radiographs of patients with AIS referred to a tertiary referral centre. They were assessed for bone maturity using the Luk Distal Radius and Ulna Classification. Assessment was performed twice by four examiners at an interval of one month. Statistical analysis was performed using the intraclass correlation (ICC) method to determine the reliabilities within and between the examiners.

RESULTS

In total, 50 radiographs (M:F = 13:37) with a mean age of 13.7 years (10 to 18) were assessed for reliability. The inter-rater ICC value was 0.918 for radius assessment and 0.939 for ulna assessment. The intra-rater ICC values for radius assessment ranged between 0.897 and 0.769 and between 0.948 and 0.786 for ulna assessment. There was near perfect correlation for both assessments.

CONCLUSION

This study provides independent evidence that the Luk Distal Radius and Ulna Classification is a reliable tool for assessment of skeletal maturity for European patients. Minimal clinical experience is required to reliably utilize it.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Controversies with nonoperative management for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Study from the APSS Scoliosis Focus Group

PURPOSE

To determine consensus among Asia-Pacific surgeons regarding nonoperative management for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

METHODS

An online REDCap questionnaire was circulated to surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region during the period of July 2019 to September 2019 to inquire about various components of nonoperative treatment for AIS. Aspects under study included access to screening, when MRIs were obtained, quality-of-life assessments used, role of scoliosis-specific exercises, bracing criteria, type of brace used, maturity parameters used, brace wear regimen, follow-up criteria, and how braces were weaned. Comparisons were made between middle-high income and low-income countries, and experience with nonoperative treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 103 responses were collected. About half (52.4%) of the responders had scoliosis screening programs and were particularly situated in middle-high income countries. Up to 34% obtained MRIs for all cases, while most would obtain MRIs for neurological problems. The brace criteria were highly variable and was usually based on menarche status (74.7%), age (59%), and Risser staging (92.8%). Up to 52.4% of surgeons elected to brace patients with large curves before offering surgery. Only 28% of responders utilized CAD-CAM techniques for brace fabrication and most (76.8%) still utilized negative molds. There were no standardized criteria for brace weaning.

CONCLUSION

There are highly variable practices related to nonoperative treatment for AIS and may be related to availability of resources in certain countries. Relative consensus was achieved for when MRI should be obtained and an acceptable brace compliance should be more than 16 hours a day.

Sanders stage 7b: Using the appearance of the ulnar physis improves decision-making for brace weaning in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether including the stages of ulnar physeal closure in Sanders stage 7 aids in a more accurate assessment for brace weaning in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of patients who were weaned from their brace and reviewed between June 2016 and December 2018. Patients who weaned from their brace at Risser stage ≥ 4, had static standing height and arm span for at least six months, and were ≥ two years post-menarche were included. Skeletal maturity at weaning was assessed using Sanders staging with stage 7 subclassified into 7a, in which all phalangeal physes are fused and only the distal radial physis is open, with narrowing of the medial physeal plate of the distal ulna, and 7b, in which fusion of > 50% of the medial growth plate of distal ulna exists, as well as the distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, an established skeletal maturity index which assesses skeletal maturation using finer stages of the distal radial and ulnar physes, from open to complete fusion. The grade of maturity at the time of weaning and any progression of the curve were analyzed using Fisher’s exact test, with Cramer’s V, and Goodman and Kruskal’s tau.

Results

We studied a total of 179 patients with AIS, of whom 149 (83.2%) were female. Their mean age was 14.8 years (SD 1.1) and the mean Cobb angle was 34.6° (SD 7.7°) at the time of weaning. The mean follow-up was 3.4 years (SD 1.8). At six months after weaning, the rates of progression of the curve for patients weaning at Sanders stage 7a and 7b were 11.4% and 0%, respectively for those with curves of < 40°. Similarly, the rates of progression of the curve for those being weaned at ulnar grade 7 and 8 using the DRU classification were 13.5% and 0%, respectively. The use of Sanders stages 6, 7a, 7b, and 8 for the assessment of maturity at the time of weaning were strongly and significantly associated (Cramer’s V 0.326; p = 0.016) with whether the curve progressed at six months after weaning. Weaning at Sanders stage 7 with subclassification allowed 10.6% reduction of error in predicting the progression of the curve.

Conclusion

The use of Sanders stages 7a and 7b allows the accurate assessment of skeletal maturity for guiding brace weaning in patients with AIS. Weaning at Sanders stage 7b, or at ulnar grade 8 with the DRU classification, is more appropriate as the curve did not progress in any patient with a curve of < 40° immediately post-weaning. Thus, reaching full fusion in both distal radial and ulnar physes (as at Sanders stage 8) is not necessary and this allows weaning from a brace to be initiated about nine months earlier. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):141–147.

Scoliosis in Goldenhar syndrome with curve reversal during brace treatment: a case report

Background

Goldenhar syndrome sometimes displays progressive scoliosis and other spinal deformities that require treatment. However, few reports exist on scoliosis correction in Goldenhar syndrome. We described the rare radiological outcomes of a patient with Goldenhar syndrome who received brace treatment for scoliosis.

Case presentation

A 4-year-old boy was diagnosed as having Goldenhar syndrome and referred to our hospital for scoliosis treatment. The deformity deteriorated gradually, and left convex scoliotic angle was 26 degrees (T3-L2) at 11 years of age. Unexpectedly during treatment with an orthopedic brace, the curve had reversed to 21 degrees (T5-L2) at 7 months of therapy. After another adjustment of the brace, his right convex scoliotic angle improved to 13 degrees (T4-L2) at 15 months of treatment.

Conclusions

Curve reversal may occur during brace treatment for scoliosis in Goldenhar syndrome. Clinicians may opt to periodically check curve correction despite the risk of increased radiation exposure.

Relationship between hand and wrist bone age assessment methods

Assessment of skeletal maturity is crucial for managing growth related problems. Tanner and Whitehouse (TW) hand and wrist bone age assessment is an accurate method; however, it is complex and labor-intensive. Several simplified methods derived from the TW method were proposed, and each had its own character. The purpose of this study is to explore the relationship between these methods for accurate usage.Between 2018 and 2019, a cross-sectional study was performed with consecutive left hand and wrist x-rays obtained from a pediatric orthopedic clinic. Bone age assessments included the distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification, Sanders staging (S), thumb ossification composite index (T), and TW method. Somers delta correlation was conducted to determine the interchangeability of these stages. The mean bone age and standard deviation (SD) of each subgrade were compared and analyzed.Totally 103 films (92 girls) were analyzed with mean age of 12.1 years (range: 8.0-17.9 years). The radius (R) stages had good correlation with S, T, and U stages with a very high Somers delta correlation (P < .05). R5 had relatively large SD (1.5) and referred to T2 and T3; R6 and R7 had the smallest SD (0.3) with reference to T4 or S2; R8 referred to T5 or S3, S4, S5; R9 referred to S6 and S7.The internal relationship between the DRU and digital stages system was well proven. We also provided a simple and accurate way to assess the bone age by combination of some subgrades with smaller SD: 10y-proximal thumb covered without sesamoid (T2); 10.5y-sesamoid just appearing (T3); 11y-distal radial physis just covered (medial double joint line, R6); 11.5y-medial capping of distal radial physis (R7); 12y-bilateral capping of distal radial physis (R8) / phalangeal capping without fusion (S3); 12.5y-distal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S4); 13y-distal phalangeal physes fused (S5); 13.5y-proximal phalangeal physes start to fuse (S6); 14.5y-proximal phalangeal physes fused (S7); 15y-distal radial physis almost fused (R10).Level of Evidence: Diagnostic study, level III.

Effectiveness of scoliosis-specific exercises for alleviating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review

Background

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common pediatric spinal deformity with reported complications including pain, mental health concern and respiratory dysfunction. The scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE) is prescribed throughout pubertal growth to slow progression although effects are unclear. This review aims to establish the effectiveness of SSE for alleviating AIS in terms of reducing Cobb angle, improving trunk asymmetry and quality of life (QoL). Additionally, it aims to define the effects of age, skeletal maturity, curve magnitude and exercise compliance on the outcomes of SSE.

Methods

A systematic reviewed was conducted to net SSE articles. Searched databases included PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL and Google scholar. The quality of study was critically appraised according to the PEDro scale.

Results

A total of ten trials with an average PEDro score of 6.9/10 were examined in this study. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two clinical controlled trials suggested that SSE alone and with bracing or traditional exercise had clinical significance in reducing Cobb angle more than 5°. One RCT specifically implicated no comparable effects between bracing and SSE in prevention of curve progression for moderate scoliosis. There was insufficient evidence to support the positive effects of SSE on improving truck asymmetry (n = 4) and QoL (n = 3). Five studies evaluated the interaction effects of age (n = 2), skeletal maturity (n = 1) and curve magnitude (n = 2) with SSE in reducing Cobb angle yet without drawing any firm conclusions.

Conclusions

Insufficient evidence is available to prove that SSE with or without other conservative treatments can reduce Cobb angle, improve trunk balance and QoL. The interaction effects of age, skeletal maturity, curve magnitude, and exercise compliance with SSE in reducing Cobb angle are not proven. Future studies should investigate the relationship of influencing factors and SSE in treating AIS but not only testing its effectiveness.

Trial registration

INPLASY202050100.

How do we follow-up patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Recommendations based on a multicenter study on the distal radius and ulna classification

PURPOSE

To determine the capability of the distal radius and ulna (DRU) classification for predicting the scoliosis progression risk within 1 year in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to develop simple recommendations for follow-up durations.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with AIS at two tertiary scoliosis referral centers were retrospectively reviewed for their DRU classification and major curve Cobb angles. Baseline DRU grades and Cobb angles with subsequent 1-year follow-up curve magnitudes were studied for scoliosis progression, which was defined as exacerbation of the Cobb angle by ≥ 6°. The relationship between DRU classification and scoliosis progression risk within 1 year was investigated. Patients were divided into three groups according to the Cobb angle (10°-19°, 20°-29°, ≥ 30°).

RESULTS

Of the 205 patients with 283 follow-up visits, scoliosis progression occurred in 86 patients (90 follow-up visits). Radius and ulna grades were significantly related to scoliosis progression (p < 0.001). R6, R7, and U5 grades were significantly related to scoliosis progression risk. The curve progression probability increased as the Cobb angle increased. Cobb angles ≥ 30°, with these grades, led to progression in > 80% of patients within 1 year. Curve progression was less likely for grades R9 and U7. Most patients with more mature DRU grades did not experience progression, even with Cobb angles ≥ 30°.

CONCLUSION

With R6, R7, and U5, scoliosis may progress within a short period; therefore, careful follow-up with short intervals within 6 months is necessary. R9 and U7 may allow longer 1-year follow-up intervals due to the lower progression risk.

Does Curve Regression Occur During Underarm Bracing in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

BACKGROUND

Successful brace treatment entails good control of scoliosis with avoidance of surgery. However, achieving curve regression may be an even better radiological result than prevention of curve progression for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Vertebral remodeling may occur with well-fitted braces. Better in-brace curve correction may influence the likelihood of vertebral remodeling and the chance of curve regression. Only a few reports have evaluated curve regression with brace treatment, and the factors associated with these events are unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What changes in curvature are observed with brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? (2) What factors are associated with curve improvement? (3) What factors are associated with curve deterioration? (4) Is curve regression associated with improvements in patient-reported objective outcome scores?

METHODS

Between September 2008 and December 2013, 666 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis underwent underarm brace treatment and were followed until skeletal maturity at 18 years old. Among these patients, 80 were excluded because of early discontinuation of brace treatment (n = 66) and loss to follow-up (n = 14). Hence, 586 patients were included in this study, with a mean brace-wear duration of 3.8 ± 1.5 years and post-weaning follow-up duration of 2.0 ± 1.1 years. The mean age at baseline was 12.6 ± 1.2 years. Most patients were female (87%, 507 of 586) and up to 53% (267 of 507) of females were post-menarche. Bracing outcomes were based on changes in the Cobb angle measured out of brace. These included curve regression, as indicated by at least a 5° reduction in the Cobb angle, curve progression, as indicated by at least a 5° increase in the Cobb angle, and unchanged, as indicated by a change in the Cobb angle of less than 5°. We studied the pre-brace and supine Cobb angles, curve flexibility (pre-brace Cobb angle - supine Cobb angle / pre-brace Cobb angle x 100%), correction rate (pre-brace Cobb angle - in-brace Cobb angle / pre-brace Cobb angle x 100%), location of apical vertebrae, apical ratio (convex vertebral height/concave vertebral height), change in the major curve Cobb angle, and apical ratio post-bracing. The refined 22-item Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire was used for patient-reported outcomes and is composed of five domains (function, pain, appearance, mental health and satisfaction with treatment). Its minimum clinically important difference, based on a scale from 0 to 5, has been quoted as 0.2 for pain, 0.08 for activity and 0.98 for appearance domains. Mental health has no quoted minimum clinically important difference for the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis population. Satisfaction with treatment is described based on improvement or deterioration in domain scores. Intergroup differences between bracing outcomes were evaluated with the Kruskal Wallis test. Univariate analyses of bracing outcomes were performed with a point-biserial correlation coefficient for continuous variables and Pearson's chi-square test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression models were created for improved and deteriorated outcomes. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

In all, 17% of patients (98 of 586) had an improved angle and 40% of patients (234 of 586) had curve deterioration. In patients who improved, the mean reduction in the Cobb angle was 9 ± 4°, while in patients who deteriorated, the mean increase in the Cobb angle was 15 ± 9°, and this was maintained at the latest post-brace weaning follow-up. Despite a trend for patients with curve regression to have higher baseline flexibility and correction rate, after controlling for age, Risser staging, radius and ulnar grading, and Sanders staging, we found no clinically important differences with increased correction rate or flexibility. We did find that improvement in the Cobb angle after bracing was associated with reduced apical ratio (odds ratio [OR] 0.84 [95% CI 0.80 to 0.87]; p < 0.001). Curve progression was associated with younger age (OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.55 to 0.91]; p = 0.008), pre-menarche status (OR 2.46 [95% CI 1.31 to 4.62]; p = 0.005), and increased apical ratio (OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.19 to 1.30]; p < 0.001) but no clinically important differences were observed with less flexible curves and reduced correction rate. Improvements in scores of the refined 22-item Scoliosis Research Society domains of function (mean difference on a scale from 0 to 5: 0.2; p = 0.001 versus 0.1; p < 0.001) and pain (mean difference on a scale from 0 to 5: 0.2; p = 0.020 versus 0.0; p = 0.853) were greater in the post-brace improvement group than in the deterioration group and fulfilled the minimum clinically important difference threshold. The appearance domain did not fulfill the minimum clinically important difference. Satisfaction with treatment domain score minimally improved with the curve regression group (mean difference on a scale from 0 to 5: 0.2) but deteriorated in the curve progression group (mean difference on a scale from 0 to 5: -0.4).

CONCLUSIONS

Curve regression occurs after underarm bracing and is associated with superior patient-reported outcome scores. This possible change in Cobb angle should be explained to patients before and during bracing. Whether this may help improve patients' duration of brace-wear should be addressed in future studies. Patients with well-fitting braces may experience curve improvement and possible vertebral remodeling. Those braced at a younger age and with increased vertebral wedging are more likely to have curve progression.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Supine flexibility predicts curve progression for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing underarm bracing

Aims

The aim of this study was to assess whether supine flexibility predicts the likelihood of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing brace treatment.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with AIS prescribed with an underarm brace between September 2008 to April 2013 and followed up until 18 years of age or required surgery. Patients with structural proximal curves that preclude underarm bracing, those who were lost to follow-up, and those who had poor compliance to bracing (<16 hours a day) were excluded. The major curve Cobb angle, curve type, and location were measured on the pre-brace standing posteroanterior (PA) radiograph, supine whole spine radiograph, initial in-brace standing PA radiograph, and the post-brace weaning standing PA radiograph. Validation of the previous in-brace Cobb angle regression model was performed. The outcome of curve progression post-bracing was tested using a logistic regression model. The supine flexibility cut-off for curve progression was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

A total of 586 patients with mean age of 12.6 years (SD 1.2) remained for analysis after exclusion. The baseline Cobb angle was similar for thoracic major curves (31.6° (SD 3.8°)) and lumbar major curves (30.3° (SD 3.7°)). Curve progression was more common in the thoracic curves than lumbar curves with mean final Cobb angles of 40.5° (SD 12.5°) and 31.8° (SD 9.8°) respectively. This dataset matched the prediction model for in-brace Cobb angle with less mean absolute error in thoracic curves (0.61) as compared to lumbar curves (1.04). Reduced age and Risser stage, thoracic curves, increased pre-brace Cobb angle, and reduced correction and flexibility rates predicted increased likelihood of curve progression. Flexibility rate of more than 28% has likelihood of preventing curve progression with bracing.

Conclusion

Supine radiographs provide satisfactory prediction for in-brace correction and post-bracing curve magnitude. The flexibility of the curve is a guide to determine the likelihood for brace success. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(2):254–260.

Reliability Comparison between "Distal Radius and Ulna" and "Simplified Tanner-Whitehouse III" Assessments for Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design

This is a retrospective clinical study.

Purpose

In this study, we aim to evaluate the reliability of the distal radius and ulna assessment (DRU) and simplified Tanner-Whitehouse III classification (sTW3) in Japanese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Overview of Literature

The greatest curvature of a scoliotic spine occurs at peak-height velocity (PHV), which is the time during which an individual’s height increases at the maximum rate. Diagnosing and appropriately treating AIS before PHV is the most effective way in order to prevent unnecessary deterioration of the scoliosis curve. Although it is difficult to detect scoliosis before PHV, DRU and sTW3, which involve evaluations using a left-hand radiograph, have been reported to be effective.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 54 hands of 40 girls with AIS who visited Nara Medical University Hospital from 2000 to 2015 using previously collected radiographs. The examiners included a spine surgeon and a pediatric orthopedic surgeon, each with over 10 years of experience. The reliability of the DRU and sTW3 was evaluated using the kappa coefficient.

Results

The left-hand radiographs of 40 female patients with AIS (mean age, 13.9±1.7 years; N=54 hands) were evaluated by two blinded examiners using the sTW3 and DRU methods. The highest inter-observer and intra-observer reliabilities (kappa, 0.64 and 0.62, respectively) for radius evaluation were determined. Radius evaluation by the DRU showed the highest agreement rate and smallest error between the inter- and intra-observer examinations.

Conclusions

The DRU was the most reliable assessment tool, and it has the potential to be useful for precisely determining the stage of skeletal maturity in outpatient clinics.

Bracing In The Treatment Of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evidence To Date

Brace effectiveness for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was controversial until recent studies provided high quality of evidence that bracing can decrease likelihood of progression and need for operative treatment. Very low evidence exists regarding bracing over 40^ο and adult degenerative scoliosis. Initial in-brace correction and compliance seem to be the most important predictive factors for successful treatment outcome. However, the amount of correction and adherence to wearing hours have not been established yet. Moderate evidence suggests that thoracic and double curves, and curves over 30^ο at an early growth stage have more risk for failure. High and low body mass index scores are also associated with low successful rates. CAD/CAM braces have shown better initial correction and are more comfortable than conventional plaster cast braces. For a curve at high risk of progression, rigid and day-time braces are significantly more effective than soft or night-time braces. No safe conclusion on effectiveness can be drawn while comparing symmetrical and asymmetrical brace designs. The addition of physiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercises in brace treatment can provide better outcomes and is recommended, when possible. Despite the growing evidence for brace effectiveness, there is still an imperative need for future high methodological quality studies to be conducted.