CD30 Positive Lymphomatoid Angiocentric Drug Reactions: Characterization of a Series of 20 Cases

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia skin infection in an immunocompetent patient: Primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder or pseudolymphoma?

Cutaneous pseudolymphomas are a wide group of diseases mimicking cutaneous lymphoma. They comprise several skin conditions with different etiopathogenesis, clinical-pathological features, and prognosis, which may occur in the absence of an identifiable trigger factor or after administration of medications or vaccinations, tattoos, infections, or arthropod bites. They present with different manifestations: from solitary to regionally clustered lesions, up to generalized distribution and, in rare cases, erythroderma. They persist variably, from weeks to years, and resolve spontaneously or after antibiotics, but may recur in some cases. CD30+ T-cell pseudolymphomas are characterized by the presence of large, activated lymphoid cells, generally in response to viral infections, arthropod assault reactions, and drug eruptions. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a ubiquitous Gram-negative bacillus responsible for opportunistic infections in immunocompromised patients. Infection of intact skin in immunocompetent patients is particularly rare. Here, we report a case of a man presenting an isolated nodule histopathologically mimicking a primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorder.

The role of eosinophils in the differential diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases

Eosinophils are known to be present in inflammatory skin diseases, but their diagnostic utility is not well established. Upon review of the published status of lesional eosinophils, several categories were identified. 1) Lesional eosinophils highly characteristic such that, in their absence, the pathologist may question the diagnosis. These include arthropod bite reactions and scabies, urticarial dermatitis, and other eosinophilic dermatoses. 2) Lesional eosinophils rare or absent, such that, in their presence, the pathologist may question the diagnosis. These include pityriasis lichenoides, graft versus host disease, and connective tissue disorders. 3) Lesional eosinophils variable and, while in some cases expected, are not required for diagnosis. These include drug reactions, atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. 4) Lesional eosinophils variable and not expected but may be seen to a limited extent. These include lichen planus and psoriasis.

CD30 in Cutaneous Pathology

ABSTRACT

The discovery of CD30 as a diagnostic marker was essential in the identification of not only some lymphomas but also many other solid tumors and benign reactive conditions. Many CD30+ cutaneous disorders and tumors have been categorized since the identification of the marker. With the design of targeted therapies against CD30+ tumoral cells, the interest in CD30 determination was not only diagnostic but also mainly therapeutic. In this article, we explore the historical aspects of the discovery of CD30 and examine the main CD30-related cutaneous pathology, susceptible of anti-CD30 modern treatments.

A Comprehensive Analysis of Topiramate and Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms

Introduction Recent publications have described drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) with topiramate. Topiramate has been associated with other severe cutaneous adverse reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, but a relationship to DRESS has not been established. To determine if there is a causal association between topiramate and DRESS, we conducted a comprehensive review of the data in the Janssen Research & Development Global Safety Database (GSD), signaling databases, and the literature. Methods The primary data were post-marketing reports of DRESS in the Janssen topiramate GSD (cumulative through 1 July 2022), representing >14,000,000 patient-years (PY) exposure. Cases were reviewed, assigned a Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reaction (RegiSCAR) score, and assessed for overall contribution of topiramate to DRESS based on temporality, concomitant medications, dechallenge/rechallenge, and baseline patient factors. Statistical disproportionality was evaluated in European Medicines Agency's EudraVigilance (EV) safety database and the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). For EV, the overall disproportionality threshold was the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the reporting odds ratio (ROR025) >1 and N ≥5. The overall threshold for FAERS was the Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean (EBGM) ≥2, lower bound of the 90% CI (EB05) of >1, and N ≥3. To account for the role of concomitant drugs, Empirical Bayes regression-adjusted arithmetic mean (ERAM) scores were calculated, with a threshold ≥2, a lower bound of the 90% CI (ER05) of >1, and N ≥3. An integrated search of major biomedical literature was performed for reports of topiramate and DRESS. Results There were 17 reports of DRESS in the GSD (reporting rate 0.12/100,000 PY). RegiSCAR scores ranged from -3 to 7 (average -0.4). No cases met full diagnostic criteria and were highly confounded by the presence of other suspect drugs. Disproportionality scores exceeded thresholds for statistical significance in FAERS (N=72, EBGM=2.06, EB05=1.69), but not in EV (N=33, ROR025=0.79). When accounting for co-administered drugs, ERAM was statistically significant for carbamazepine (4.53), lamotrigine (ERAM=6.54), phenytoin (ERAM=2.91), and zonisamide (ERAM=2.25) exceeding disproportionality thresholds, but the score of topiramate was no longer significant (0.25). Conclusion A comprehensive review of all available evidence does not support a causal association between topiramate and DRESS.

Understanding the enigmatic association between mycosis fungoides and psoriasis: Report of two cases and review of the literature

Psoriatic patients present an increased risk for developing lymphoma, particularly cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). To what degree psoriasis itself through chronic immune stimulation, or the immunosuppressive medications used for its treatment or comorbidities (obesity, diabetes mellitus, etc), or lifestyle (smoking, alcohol, diet, etc) may play a role in the onset of MF is not yet clear. Psoriasis and Mycosis Fungoides (MF), the most common variant of CTCL, represent two distinct entities sharing common pathogenetic mechanisms and a wide spectrum of common clinical features associated with the abnormal activation of T-cells. The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between MF and psoriasis by presenting two cases with clinical and histopathologic features of both psoriasis and MF with a particular emphasis on the time of presentation of both disorders, the use of previous immunosuppressive drugs as well as the therapeutic management of patients. Biopsy of the cutaneous lesions before the introduction of biologics should be incorporated in clinical practice. Biopsy of the cutaneous lesion should also be performed in the case of appearance of psoriasiform lesions during biologic treatment for autoimmune disorders because this may represent an indolent form of MF. Psoriatic patients with poor or no-response to treatment should be examined thoroughly for MF using immunochemistry and, if necessary, molecular biology techniques. In concomitant MF and psoriasis, combination treatment may be beneficial for both entities. Finally, a large multicentric registry of MF patients who were treated for benign dermatoses (i.e. eczema, psoriasis) with classic immunosuppressive drugs and/or biologics is needed to collect data and further clarify the enigmatic relationship between psoriasis, MF and immunosuppressive treatment.

Symmetric drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema: Clinicopathologic study of 19 cases and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Symmetric drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) is a cutaneous drug reaction characterized by gluteal/anogenital erythema and symmetric involvement of other intertriginous location(s) without systemic signs. Clinicopathologic characterization has been limited to case reports and small series. We describe 19 new cases and review the literature to better define the clinical and histopathologic spectrum of SDRIFE.

METHODS

Pathology archives were searched for "SDRIFE" and "baboon syndrome." Cases meeting clinical criteria were included. Clinical and histopathologic features were recorded. Previous reports of SDRIFE with histopathologic descriptions were reviewed.

RESULTS

Nineteen new cases were included, over half triggered by antibiotics. Six new causative medications were identified. Median onset was 7 days. Typical lesions were erythematous plaques or papules with or without scale. The most common histopathologic finding was superficial perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate followed by dermal eosinophils, spongiosis, and orthokeratosis. Basal vacuolization and apoptotic keratinocytes were less common. Interstitial histiocytes were present in almost half of our cases. Other findings included atypical lymphocytes and "flame figure."

CONCLUSIONS

Appreciation of the range of inciting medications and clinicopathologic features in SDRIFE will improve recognition of this condition. Although many histopathologic features overlap with other common dermatitides, biopsy may assist in excluding key clinical mimics.

Lichen aureus with pseudolymphomatous infiltrate

Lichen aureus is a variant of pigmented purpuric dermatoses. The usual histopathology of lichen aureus is characterized by a subepidermal dense, band-like lymphocytic infiltrate, extravasated erythrocytes, and hemosiderin deposits. We report three patients with lichen aureus on the extremities with similar clinical, dermoscopic, and histopathological findings characterized by a dense band-like relatively deep dermal infiltrate accompanied by extravasation of erythrocytes and hemosiderin deposits occasioning a resemblance to a lymphoproliferative disorder.

How I treat primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders

The primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders are a family of extranodal lymphoid neoplasms that arise from mature postthymic T cells and localize to the skin. Current classification systems recognize lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP), primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma, and borderline cases. In the majority of patients, the prognosis of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders is excellent; however, relapses are common, and complete cures are rare. Skin-directed and systemic therapies are used as monotherapy or in combination to achieve the best disease control and minimize overall toxicity. We discuss 3 distinct presentations of primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder and present recommendations for a multidisciplinary team approach to diagnosis, evaluation, and management of these conditions in keeping with existing consensus guidelines.

The Inflammatory Effects of Breast Implant Particulate Shedding: Comparison With Orthopedic Implants

Currently, there is a dearth of information regarding the degree of particle shedding from breast implants (BIs) and what are the general biological consequences of BI debris. Thus, it is unclear to what degree BI debris compromises the long-term biological performance of BIs. For orthopedic implants, it is well established that the severity of biological reactivity to implant debris governs long-term clinical performance. Orthopedic implant particulate debris is generally in the range of 0.01 to 100 μm in diameter. Implant debris-induced bioreactivity/inflammation is mostly a peri-implant phenomenon caused by local innate immune cells (eg, macrophages) that produce proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, and prostaglandin 2 (PGE2). In orthopedics, there have been few systemic concerns associated with polymeric implant debris (like silicone) other than documented dissemination to remote organs (eg, liver, spleen, etc.) with no known associated pathogenicity. This is not true of metal implant debris where normal (well-functioning) implants can induce systemic reactions such as delayed type hypersensitivity. Diagnostic analysis of orthopedic tissues has focused on innate (macrophage mediated) and adaptive (lymphocyte-mediated hypersensitivity) immune responses. Orthopedic implant debris-associated lymphocyte cancers have not been reported in over 40 years of orthopedic literature. Adaptive immune responses such as hypersensitivity reactions to orthopedic implant debris have been dominated by certain implant types that produce specific kinds of debris (eg, metal-on-metal total joint prostheses). Orthopedic hypersensitivity responses and atypical BI bioreactivity such as BI-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma share crossover markers for diagnosis. Differentiating normal innate immune reactivity to particles from anaplastic large cell lymphoma reactions from delayed type hypersensitivity reactions to BI-associated implant debris remains unclear but vital to patients and surgeons.