Do anastomotic leaks impair postoperative health-related quality of life after rectal cancer surgery? A case-matched study

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study on surgical outcomes and long-term survival

Although the safety and short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients are well-documented, there is limited research on the long-term survival outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery. This is a retrospective study that includes 502 patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer between August 2016 and September 2021. All patients were diagnosed with rectal or sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to minimize selection bias. Perioperative outcomes, complication rates, and pathological data were evaluated and compared. The 5-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were calculated and compared. Before matching, patients in the robotic group had earlier pathological T and N stages and were more likely to have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to the laparoscopic group. After matching, most clinicopathological outcomes were similar between the two groups, but the robotic group had longer operative times and a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic group. After matching for clinical factors, the 5-year DFS rates were 88.19% for the robotic group and 82.46% for the laparoscopic group (P = 0.122), and the OS rates were 90.5% and 79.5% (P = 0.342), showing no significant differences. In the stratified analysis, patients in the robotic surgery group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates in the following subgroups: age < 65 years, TNM stage I-II, received neoadjuvant therapy, and primary tumor located in the rectum. The safety and efficacy of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer were validated compared to laparoscopic surgery, with both groups of patients exhibiting comparable long-term prognoses.

An Institutional Shift from Routine to Selective Diversion of Low Anastomosis in Robotic TME Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Using the KHANS Technique: A Single-Centre Cohort Study

(1) Background: In recent years, there has been a change in practice for diverting stomas in rectal cancer surgery, shifting from routine diverting stomas to a more selective approach. Studies suggest that the benefits of temporary ileostomies do not live up to their risks, such as high-output stomas, stoma dysfunction, and reoperation. (2) Methods: All rectal cancer patients treated with a robotic resection in a single tertiary colorectal centre in the UK from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. In 2015, our unit made a shift to a more selective approach to temporary diverting ileostomies. The cohort was divided into a routine diversion group treated before 2015 and a selective diversion group treated after 2015. Both groups were analysed and compared for short-term outcomes and morbidities. (3) Results: In group A, 63/70 patients (90%) had a diverting stoma compared to 98/135 patients (72.6%) in group B (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the groups in anastomotic leakages (11.8% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.312) or other complications (p = 0.117). There were also no significant differences in readmission (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.312) or reoperation (3.8% vs. 2.6%, p = 1.000) after stoma closure. After 1 year, 71.6% and 71.9% (p = 1.000) of patients were stoma-free. One major reason for the delay in stoma reversal was the COVID-19 pandemic, which only occurred in group B (0% vs. 22%, p = 0.054). (4) Conclusions: A more selective approach to diverting stomas for robotic rectal cancer patients does not lead to more complications or leaks and can be considered in the treatment of rectal cancer tumours.

Colorectal anastomotic leakage: a narrative review of definitions, grading systems, and consequences of leaks

Background

Anastomotic leaks (ALs) are a significant and feared postoperative complication, with incidence of up to 30% despite advances in surgical techniques. With implications such as additional interventions, prolonged hospital stays, and hospital readmission, ALs have important impacts at the level of individual patients and healthcare providers, as well as healthcare systems as a whole. Challenges in developing unified definitions and grading systems for leaks have proved problematic, despite acknowledgement that colorectal AL is a critical issue in intestinal surgery with serious consequences. The aim of this study was to construct a narrative review of literature surrounding definitions and grading systems for ALs, and consequences of this postoperative complication.

Methods

A literature review was conducted by examining databases including PubMed, Web of Science, OVID Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane library databases. Searches were performed with the following keywords: anastomosis, anastomotic leak, colorectal, surgery, grading system, complications, risk factors, and consequences. Publications that were retrieved underwent further assessment to ensure other relevant publications were identified and included.

Results

A universally accepted definition and grading system for ALs continues to be lacking, leading to variability in reported incidence in the literature. Additional factors add to variability in estimates, including differences in the anastomotic site and institutional/individual differences in operative technique. Various groups have worked to publish guidelines for defining and grading AL, with the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer (ISGRC/ISREC) definition the current most recommended universal definition for colorectal AL. The burden of AL on patients, healthcare providers, and hospitals is well documented in evidence from leak consequences, such as increased morbidity and mortality, higher reoperation rates, and increased readmission rates, among others.

Conclusions

Colorectal AL remains a significant challenge in intestinal surgery, despite medical advancements. Understanding the progress made in defining and grading leaks, as well as the range of negative outcomes that arise from AL, is crucial in improving patient care, reduce surgical mortality, and drive further advancements in earlier detection and treatment of AL.

Management of acute and chronic pelvic sepsis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-a 10-year experience of a national referral centre

AIM

Uncontrolled pelvic sepsis following rectal cancer surgery may lead to dramatic consequences with significant impact on patients' quality of life. The aim of this retrospective observational study is to evaluate management of pelvic sepsis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer at a national referral centre.

METHOD

Referred patients with acute or chronic pelvic sepsis after sphincter preserving rectal cancer resection, with the year of referral between 2010 and 2014 (A) or between 2015 and 2020 (B), were included. The main outcome was control of pelvic sepsis at the end of follow-up, with healed anastomosis with restored faecal stream (RFS) as co-primary outcome.

RESULTS

In total 136 patients were included: 49 in group A and 87 in group B. After a median follow-up of 82 months (interquartile range 35-100) in group A and 42 months (interquartile range 22-60) in group B, control of pelvic sepsis was achieved in all patients who received endoscopic vacuum assisted surgical closure (7/7 and 2/2), in 91% (19/21) and 89% (31/35) of patients who received redo anastomosis (P = 1.000) and in 100% (18/18) and 95% (41/43) of patients who received intersphincteric resection (P = 1.000), respectively. Restorative procedures resulted in a healed anastomosis with RFS in 61% (17/28) of patients in group A and 68% (25/37) of patients in group B (P = 0.567).

CONCLUSION

High rates of success can be achieved with surgical salvage of pelvic sepsis in a dedicated tertiary referral centre, without significant differences over time. In well selected and motivated patients a healed anastomosis with RFS can be achieved in the majority.

Outcomes following anastomotic leak from rectal resections, including bowel function and quality of life

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients' quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180).

CONCLUSION

The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.

A phase III randomized trial evaluating the quality of life impact of a tailored versus systematic use of defunctioning ileostomy following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer-GRECCAR 17 trial protocol

AIM

The systematic use of a defunctioning ileostomy for 2-3 months postoperatively to protect low colorectal anastomosis (<7 cm from the anal verge) has been the standard practice after total mesorectal excision (TME). However, stoma-related complications can occur in 20%-60% of cases, which may lead to prolonged inpatient care, urgent reoperation and long-term definitive stoma. A negative impact on quality of life (QoL) and increased healthcare expenses are also observed. Conversely, it has been reported that patients without a defunctioning stoma or following early stoma closure (days 8-12 after TME) have a better functional outcome than patients with systematic defunctioning stoma in situ for 2-3 months.

METHOD

The main objective of this trial is to compare the QoL impact of a tailored versus systematic use of a defunctioning stoma after TME for rectal cancer. The primary outcome is QoL at 12 months postoperatively using the European Organization for. Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire QLQ-C30. Among 29 centres of the French GRECCAR network, 200 patients will be recruited over 18 months, with follow-up at 1, 4, 8 and 12 months postoperatively, in an open-label, randomized, two-parallel arm, phase III superiority clinical trial. The experimental arm (arm A) will undergo a tailored use of defunctioning stoma after TME based on a two-step process: (i) to perform or not a defunctioning stoma according to the personalized risk of anastomotic leak (defunctioning stoma only if modified anastomotic failure observed risk score ≥2) and (ii) if a stoma is fashioned, whether to perform an early stoma closure at days 8-12, according to clinical (fever), biochemical (C-reactive protein level on days 2 and 4 postoperatively) and radiological postoperative assessment (CT scan with retrograde contrast enema at days 7-8 postoperatively). The control arm (arm B) will undergo systematic use of a defunctioning stoma for 2-3 months after TME for all patients, in keeping with French national and international guidelines. Secondary outcomes will include comprehensive analysis of functional outcomes (including bowel, urinary and sexual function) again up to 12 months postoperatively and a cost analysis. Regular assessments of anastomotic leak rates in both arms (every 50 randomized patients) will be performed and an independent data monitoring committee will recommend trial cessation if this rate is excessive in arm A compared to arm B.

CONCLUSION

The GRECCAR 17 trial is the first randomized trial to assess a tailored, patient-specific approach to decisions regarding defunctioning stoma use and closure after TME according to personalized risk of anastomotic leak. The results of this trial will describe, for the first time, the QoL and morbidity impact of selective use of a defunctioning ileostomy and the potential health economic effect of such an approach.

The effect of anastomotic leak on postoperative pelvic function and quality of life in rectal cancer patients

AIM

The aim of this review was to collect all available literature data analysing the effects of the anastomotic leak (AL) on post-sphincter preserving rectal cancer surgery bowel and urogenital function as well as to quality of life (QoL) dimensions.

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed and Embase electronic databases was conducted by two independent investigators and all studies using either functional parameters or QoL as a primary or secondary endpoint after a rectal cancer surgery AL were included.

RESULTS

Amongst the 13 identified studies focusing on the post-AL neorecto-anal function, 3 case-matched studies,3 comparative studies and 1 population-based study supported the deleterious effects of the AL on bowel function, with disturbances of the types of high bowel movement frequency, urgency and increased incontinent episodes to predominate. At one case-matched study the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score was inferior in the AL patients. At limited under-powered studies, urinary frequency, reduced male sexual activity and female dyspareunia may be linked to a prior AL. According to two QoL-targeted detailed studies, QoL disturbances, such as physical and emotional function difficulties may persist up to 3 years after the AL occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

AL may have adverse effects on postoperative pelvic function and QoL in rectal cancer patients. As evidenced by this literature review, the limited reports on this intriguing topic may trigger the initiative for planning and undertaking larger, multicentre studies on rectal cancer patients with varying degrees of AL severity.

Clinical impact of the triple-layered circular stapler for reducing the anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: Porcine model and multicenter retrospective cohort analysis

Aim

To investigate the impact of the triple-layered circular stapler compared with the double-layered circular stapler on anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Methods

The bursting pressure was compared between porcine ileocolic anastomoses created using a double- or triple-layered stapler. We also retrospectively analyzed the incidence of severe anastomotic leakage in 194 patients who underwent colorectal anastomosis using a double- or triple-layered circular stapler during rectal cancer resection performed in two cancer centers between January 2015 and April 2021.

Results

In the porcine model, the bursting pressure was higher in anastomoses created using the triple-layered stapler than the double-layered stapler (end-to-end anastomosis: 26.4 ± 6.2 mm Hg vs 14.5 ± 4.3 mm Hg, P = .0031; side-to-side anastomosis: 27.7 ± 5.0 mm Hg vs 18.0 ± 2.9 mm Hg, P = .0275). Intersectional leakage occurred in 41% and 83% of anastomoses created using the triple- or double-layered stapler, respectively (P = .0821). In the clinical cohort, the double- and triple-layered stapler was used in 153 and 41 patients, respectively. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was lower for anastomoses created using the triple-layered stapler vs the double-layered stapler (0.0% vs 5.8%, P = .0362). In multivariate analysis, the factors independently associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage were female sex (odds ratio: 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.01-0.90, P = .0354) and triple-layered stapler usage (odds ratio: 0.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.00-0.96, P = .0465).

Conclusion

Anastomoses created using a triple-layered circular stapler had high bursting pressure, which might contribute to a lower incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Transanal endoluminal repair for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection

BACKGROUND

There is still no consensus on the management of colorectal anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection. The goal was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who underwent transanal endoluminal repair + laparoscopic drainage ± stoma vs. drainage only ± stoma.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients sustaining anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection between January 2013 and September 2020 who required laparoscopic reoperation.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients were included, 22 patients underwent combined laparoscopy and transanal endoluminal repair and 27 patients had drainage with a stoma (n = 16) or drainage alone (n = 11), without direct anastomotic repair. The overall morbidity rate was 30.6% and the mortality rate was 2%. Combined laparoscopic lavage/drainage and transanal endoluminal repair of anastomotic leakage was associated with a lower complication rate (13.6% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.03) and fewer intraabdominal infections (4.5% vs. 29.6%, p = 0.03) compared with no repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined laparoscopic lavage/drainage and transanal endoluminal repair is effective in the management of colorectal anastomosis leakage and was associated with lower morbidity-in particular intraabdominal infection-compared with no repair. However, our results need to be confirmed in larger, and ideally randomized, studies.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on complications of transanal total mesorectal excision

AIM

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a surgical approach for treating mid to low rectal cancer as well as other colorectal diseases. Since the procedure is difficult to master, perioperative complications of TaTME should be examined precisely, especially during the early implementation phase of this procedure. The primary aim of this review was to determine a pooled morbidity and anastomotic leakage (AL) rate after TaTME surgery, and the secondary aim was to show the completeness of reporting of complications among the included studies, as well as the correlation between completeness and reported incidence of complications.

METHOD

A systematic review of literature was conducted using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases, searching for observational studies reporting on complications after TaTME. Studies published between 1 January 2010 and 15 October 2019 were included. Meta-analysis on the proportion of morbidity, AL and intraoperative complications was performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies (2446 TaTME cases), consisting of 27 noncomparative studies and 14 comparative studies, were included, after screening 1711 possible studies. The pooled rates of overall morbidity and AL were 30.0% (95% CI 26.4%-34.0%) and 6.8% (95% CI 5.2%-8.9%), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the morbidity rate in studies that reported 30-day results (35.5%; 95% CI 31.8%-39.4%) was significantly higher than the rate in studies that did not define the follow-up length for complications (23.4%; 95% CI 17.8%-30.1%; p = 0.003). The rates of intraoperative urethral injury, rectal injury, vaginal injury and bladder injury were 0.3% (95% CI 0.1%-1.7%), 0.4% (95% CI 0.1%-2.2%), 0.3% (95% CI 0.1%-0.8%) and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1%-1.7%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that pooled perioperative complication rates were within acceptable ranges. However, the significant difference in overall morbidity rate between the studies with 30-day results and the studies without a specified follow-up time, indicates a large under-reporting of complications in many studies.

Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Resection for Sigmoid and Rectal Cancer: Analysis of 109 Patients From a Single Center in China

Background: Robotic colorectal surgery has been increasingly performed in recent years. The safety and feasibility of its application has also been demonstrated worldwide.However, limited studies have presented clinical data for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving robotic surgery in China. The aim of this study is to present short-term clinical outcomes of robotic surgery and further confirm its safety and feasibility in Chinese CRC patients.

Methods: The clinical data of 109 consecutive CRC patients who received robotic surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient characteristics,tumor traits, treatment details, complications, pathological details, and survival status were evaluated.

Results: Among the 109 patients, 35 (32.1%) had sigmoid cancer, and 74 (67.9%) had rectal cancer. Thirty-seven (33.9%) patients underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Ten (9.2%) patients underwent sigmoidectomy, 38 (34.9%) underwent high anterior resection (HAR), 45 (41.3%) underwent low anterior resection (LAR), and 16 (14.7%) underwent abdominoperineal resection (APR). The median surgical procedure time was 270 min (range 120–465 min). Pathologically complete resection was achieved in all patients. There was no postoperative mortality. Complications occurred in 11 (10.1%) patients, including 3 (2.8%) anastomotic leakage, 1 (0.9%) anastomotic bleeding, 1 (0.9%) pelvic hemorrhage, 4 (3.7%) intestinal obstruction, 2 (1.8%) chylous leakage, and 1 (0.9%) delayed wound union. At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1–37 months), 1 (0.9%) patient developed local recurrence and 5 (4.6%) developed distant metastasis, with one death due to disease progression.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that robotic surgery is technically feasible and safe for Chinese CRC patients, especially for rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment. A robotic laparoscope with large magnification showed a clear surgical space for pelvic autonomic nerve preservation in cases of mesorectal edema.

The Contribution of a Collagen Patch Coated With Fibrin Glue in Sealing Upper Gastrointestinal Defects: An Experimental Study

BACKGROUND/AIM

We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sealing primary upper gastrointestinal (GI) perforations with a collagen patch coated with fibrin glue (Tachosil^®).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty New Zealand rabbits were used in this study. An iatrogenic gastric perforation was created, and primary repair was performed on the control group. Tachosil^®, without suturing the deficit, was used in the intervention group.

RESULTS

Leakage was observed in 3 (20%) and 2 rabbits (13.3%) in the control and intervention group, respectively; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.62). Moreover, adhesions formed in 10/15 and all rabbits in the intervention and control group, respectively (p=0.014); however, based on the Zuhlke adhesion's classification, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

A collagen patch coated with fibrin glue is not a replacement but can be considered a safe option for the reinforcement of suturing, preventing leakages in the upper GI tract.

Efficacy of endoscopic management for anastomotic leakage after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer

Background

Anastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients is associated with high mortality rates. Various endoscopic procedures are available to manage this postoperative complication. The aim of study was to evaluate the outcome of two endoscopic modalities, clippings and stents, for the treatment of AL.

Patients and methods

There were 4916 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy between December 2007 and January 2016 at the National Cancer Center, Korea. A total of 115 patients (2.3%) developed AL. Of these, 85 patients (1.7%) received endoscopic therapy for AL and were included in this retrospective study. The endpoints were the complete leakage closure rates and risk factors associated with failure of endoscopic therapy.

Results

Of the 85 patients, 62 received endoscopic clippings (with or without detachable snares), and 23 received a stent insertion. Overall, the complete leakage closure rate was 80%, and no significant difference was found between the clipping and stent groups (79.0% vs. 82.6%, respectively; P = 0.89). The complete leakage closure rate was significantly lower in the duodenal and jejunal stump sites (60%) than esophageal sites (86.1%) and gastric sites (94.1%; P = 0.026). The multivariate analysis showed that stump leakage sites (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.51; P = 0.031) and the presence of intra-abdominal abscess (aOR, 4.92; P = -0.025) were associated with unsuccessful leakage closures.

Conclusions

Endoscopic therapy using clippings or stents is an effective method for the postoperative management of AL in gastric cancer patients. This therapy can be considered a primary treatment option due to its demonstrated efficacy, safety, and minimally invasive nature.

C reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) as predictor of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications in colorectal surgery. Currently, no predictive biomarkers of AL are available. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of C reactive protein (CRP) to albumin ratio (CAR) as a predictor of AL in patients undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on 1183 consecutive patients surgically treated for histologically proven colorectal cancer in the surgical units involved in the study were collected. Data included sex, age, BMI, ASA score, Charlson comorbidity index, localization, histology and stage of the disease, as well as blood tests including albumin and CRP at the 4th postoperative day. Differences in CAR between patients who developed AL and those who did not were analyzed, and the ability of CAR to predict AL was investigated with ROC analysis.

RESULTS

CAR was significantly higher in patients with AL in comparison to those without, at the 4th postoperative day. In ROC analysis CAR showed a good ability in detecting AL (AUC 0.825, 95%CI: 0,786-0,859), greater than those of CRP and albumin alone. CAR also showed a high ability in detecting postoperative deaths (AUC 0.750, 95% CI 0,956-0,987). These findings were confirmed in multivariate analysis including the most relevant risk factors for AL.

CONCLUSION

Our study evidenced that CAR, an inexpensive and widely available laboratory biomarker, adequately predicts AL and death in patients who underwent elective surgery for colorectal cancer.

Improvement of colonic healing and surgical recovery with perioperative supplementation of inulin and galacto-oligosaccharides

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Anastomotic leak (AL) is a major complication in colorectal surgery. Recent evidence suggests that the gut microbiota may affect healing and may cause or prevent AL. Butyrate is a beneficial short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) that is produced as a result of bacterial fermentation of dietary oligosaccharides and has been described as beneficial in the maintenance of colonic health. To assess the impact of oligosaccharides on colonic anastomotic healing in mice, we propose to modulate the microbiota with oligosaccharides to increase butyrate production via enhancement of butyrate-producing bacteria and, consequently, improve anastomotic healing in mice.

METHODS

Animal experiments were conducted in mice that were subjected to diets supplemented with inulin, galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) or cellulose, as a control, for two weeks before undergoing a surgical colonic anastomosis. Macroscopic and histological assessment of the anastomosis was performed. Extent of epithelial proliferation was assessed by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. Gelatin zymography was used to evaluate the extent of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) hydrolytic activity.

RESULTS

Inulin and GOS diets were associated with increased butyrate production and better anastomotic healing. Histological analysis revealed an enhanced mucosal continuity, and this was associated with an increased re-epithelialization of the wound as determined by increased epithelial proliferation. Collagen concentration in peri-anastomotic tissue was higher with inulin and GOS diets and MMP activity, a marker of collagen degradation, was lower with both oligosaccharides. Inulin and GOS diets were further associated with lower bacterial translocation.

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary supplementation with inulin and GOS may improve anastomotic healing and reinforce the gut barrier in mice.

Temporal Changes of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score after Sphincter Preservation: A Prospective Cohort Study on Repetitive Assessment of Rectal Cancer Patients

Background: There is a relative shortage of studies directly addressing the postoperative rectal cancer patients' evacuatory dysfunction, as estimated by the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score at repeated assessment time-points. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the incidence of LARS at predefined time intervals during the first 3 years after sphincter preserving rectal cancer surgery and to enlighten the effect of identified risk factors.Materials and methods: Seventy-eight patients, who remained alive and recurrence-free 2 years after (ultra-) low anterior resection were prospectively assessed at 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months postoperatively, using the LARS score as bowel dysfunction outcome measure. All patients have completed the 2-year follow-up functional assessment, while 56 and 37 of them have been evaluated up to the 30^th and the 36^th postoperative month, respectively.Results: The proportion of patients with "major and minor" LARS significantly decreased during the first 3 evaluations (up to 18 months) (74% vs 62% vs 35%, p = 0.0001). The tumor distance from the anal verge and the neoadjuvant radiotherapy were identified as risk factors for high LARS score at 6 months (p < 0.03). The tumor distance remained as risk factor throughout the entire follow-up. All patients with high tumors were alleviated from symptoms reflecting "major" or "minor" LARS at 18 months. Most patients (90%) after radiotherapy showed a high LARS score in the first semester, but improved afterwards.Conclusion: Overall, the LARS score improves in the majority of patients after 18 months, with low tumor height and radiation adversely affecting them. Our results may be useful in more accurately define the postoperative "functional course" of rectal cancer patients and in aiding their consultation on expected functional outcome.

Preservation of the left colic artery and superior rectal artery in laparoscopic surgery can reduce anastomotic leakage in sigmoid colon cancer

Background

The aim was to study the clinical significance in the preservation of the left colic artery (LCA) and superior rectal artery (SRA) for the laparoscopic resection of sigmoid colon cancer (SCC).

Patients and Methods

A total of 316 patients with SCC were divided into two groups. Group A received D3 resection with preservation of LCA and SRA, whereas Group B ligatured artery at the root of the inferior mesenteric artery. The operation time, number of resected lymph nodes, blood loss and anastomotic leakage rate were compared.

Results

In Group A, the average operation time was 283.02 ± 51.48 min, the average blood loss was 111.81 ± 77.08 ml and the average lymph node dissection was 14.8 ± 7.7. There was no statistical significance in blood loss and number of resected lymph nodes between Group A and B (P > 0.05). Longer operating time were observed in Group A as compared to Group B (P < 0.05). The anastomotic leakage rate had statistical significance between these two groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Preservation of LCA and SRA was safe and feasible for the laparoscopic surgery of SCC, which could reduce anastomotic leakage rate.

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on short-term outcomes and long-term overall survival after colorectal resection for cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of socioeconomic deprivation on short-term outcomes and long-term overall survival following major resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) at a tertiary hospital in England.

METHOD

This was an observational cohort study of patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer from January 2010 to December 2017. Deprivation was classified into quintiles using the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010. Primary outcome was overall complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 to 5). Secondary outcomes were the major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3 to 5), length of hospital stay and overall survival. Outcomes were compared between most affluent group and most deprived group. Multivariate regression models were used to establish the relationship taking into account confounding variables.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred thirty-five patients were included. Overall and major complication rates were 44.9% and 11.5% respectively in the most affluent, and 54.6% and 15.6% in the most deprived group. Most deprived group was associated with higher overall complications (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 1.13-1.95, p = 0.005), higher major complications (odds ratio 1.49, 1.01-2.23, p = 0.048) and longer hospital stay (adjusted ratio 1.15, 1.06-1.25, p < 0.001) when compared with most affluent group. Median follow period was 41 months (interquartile range 20-64.5). Most deprived group had poor overall survival compared with most affluent, but it was not significant at the 5% level (hazard ratio 1.27, 0.99-1.62, p = 0.055).

CONCLUSION

Deprivation was associated with higher postoperative complications and longer hospital stay following major resection for CRC. Its relationship with survival was not statistically significant.

Health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis of gum chewing in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative ileus (POI) and anastomotic leakage (AL) following colorectal surgery severely increase healthcare costs and decrease quality of life. This study evaluates the effects of reducing POI and AL via perioperative gum chewing compared to placebo (control) on in-hospital costs, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and assesses cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

In patients undergoing elective, open colorectal surgery, changes in HRQoL were assessed using EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires and costs were estimated from a hospital perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated.

RESULTS

In 112 patients, mean costs for ward stay were significantly lower in the gum chewing group when compared to control (€3522 (95% CI €3034-€4010) versus €4893 (95% CI €3843-€5942), respectively, p = .020). No differences were observed in mean overall in-hospital costs, or in mean change in any of the HRQoL scores or utilities. Gum chewing was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared to the control in more than 50% of the simulations for both POI and AL.

CONCLUSION

Reducing POI and AL via gum chewing reduced costs for ward stay, but did not affect overall in-hospital costs, HRQoL, or mapped utilities. More studies with adequate sample sizes using validated questionnaires at standardized time points are needed.

Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Open Resection Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Mid-Low Rectal Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The optimal approach of resection for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to clarify the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery compared with open resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a literature search for studies on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library up to March 1, 2018. Review Manager software was applied for data analysis. We used weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous parameters and odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous variables. Confidence interval (CI) was set at 95% and a P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis: 466 patients in laparoscopic group and 491 in open group. The pooled result revealed that laparoscopic resection had a favorable blood loss (WMD = -116.88 mL; 95% CI: -189.78 to -43.99; P = .002), analogous lymph nodes harvest (WMD = -0.30; 95% CI: -1.29 to 0.70; P = .56), less postoperative complications (OR = 0.63; 95% CI: 0.46-0.88; P = .006), shorter time to pass first flatus (WMD = -0.76 day; 95% CI: -1.00 to -0.51; P < .00001), and stay in hospital (WMD = -2.71 days; 95% CI: -4.54 to -0.88; P = .004), despite similar operating time (WMD = 11.17 minutes; 95% CI: -14.37 to 36.70; P = .39).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic resection might be a technically safe and feasible approach for mid-low rectal cancer patients after nCRT compared with open resection.

Impact of an institutional change from routine to highly selective diversion of a low anastomosis after TME for rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The need for routine diverting ileostomy following restorative total mesorectal excision (TME) is increasingly debated as the benefits might not outweigh the disadvantages. This study evaluated an institutional shift from routine (RD) to highly selective diversion (HSD) after TME surgery for rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients having TME with primary anastomosis and HSD for low or mid rectal cancer between December 2014 and March 2017 were compared with a historical control group with RD in the preceding period since January 2011. HSD was introduced in conjunction with uptake of transanal TME.

RESULTS

In the RD group, 45/50 patients (90%) had a primary diverting stoma, and 3/40 patients (8%) in the HSD group. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 10 (20%) and three (8%) cases after a median follow-up of 36 and 19 months after RD and HSD, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. An unintentional stoma beyond 1 year postoperative was present in six and two patients, respectively. One-year stoma-related readmission and reoperation rate (including reversal) after RD were 84% and 86%, respectively. Corresponding percentages were significantly lower after HSD (17% and 17%; P < 0.001). Total hospital stay within one year was median 11 days (IQR 8-19) versus 5 days (IQR 4-11), respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This single institutional comparative cohort study shows that highly selective defunctioning of a low anastomosis in rectal cancer patients did not adversely affect incidence or consequences of anastomotic leakage with a substantial decrease in 1-year readmission and reintervention rate, leading to an overall significantly reduced hospital stay.

Local antibiotic decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage short-term outcome in rectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leakage still presents an issue in rectal cancer surgery with rates of about 11%. As bacteria play a critical role, there is the concept of perioperative local decontamination to prevent anastomotic leakage.

METHODS

To ascertain the effectiveness of this treatment, we performed a retrospective analysis on 206 rectal resections with primary anastomosis and routine use of a selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) regimen for local decontamination. SDD medication was administered every 8 h from the day before surgery to the seventh postoperative day. All patients were treated according to the fast-track protocol without mechanical bowel preparation; instead, a laxative was used.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity was 30%, overall mortality 0.5%. In our data, overall rate of anastomotic leakage (AL) was 5.8%, with 3.9% in anterior rectal resection and 6.5% in low anterior rectal resection group. In 75% of cases, anastomotic leakage was grade "C" and needed re-laparotomy. Surgical site infection rate was 19.9%. No serious adverse events were related to decontamination.

CONCLUSION

Local antibiotic decontamination appears to be safe and effective to decrease the rate of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery. Further focus should be on perioperative management including bowel preparation and choice of antimicrobial agents for local decontamination.

Using outcomes data to justify instituting new technology: a single institution's experience

Background

The PILLAR II trial demonstrated PINPOINT is safe, feasible to use with no reported adverse events and resulted in no anastomotic leaks in patients who had a change in surgical plan based on PINPOINT’s intraoperative assessment of tissue perfusion during colorectal resection. Whether the cost savings associated with this reduction in anastomotic complications can offset the cost of investing in PINPOINT is unknown.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients (N = 347) undergoing colectomy with primary anastomosis from January 2015 to April 2016. These patients were stratified based on whether fluorescence imaging was used intraoperatively. The clinical outcomes of these patients were then evaluated based on their development of an anastomotic leak or stricture. The direct hospital costs per case were then calculated, and the economic impact of using fluorescence imaging was examined to assess whether decreased direct costs would justify the initial expenditures to purchase new technology (PINPOINT System, NOVADAQ, Canada).

Results

Fluorescence imaging in colorectal surgery using PINPOINT reduced the anastomotic failure rate in patients who underwent colon resection. The PINPOINT group (n = 238) had two (0.84%) anastomotic failures, while the non-PINPOINT group (n = 109) had six (5.5%) anastomotic failures. In the PINPOINT group, 11 (4.6%) patients had a change in the resection margin based on the results of the fluorescence imaging, and none of these patients experienced an anastomotic failure. Cost per case was less in the PINPOINT group secondary to fewer direct costs associated with complications.

Conclusions

These results validate the findings of the PILLAR II trial and confirm the decrease in direct costs due to reduction in anastomotic failures as a result of using PINPOINT justified the expense of the new technology after just 143 cases.

Does Anastomotic Leak Contribute to High Failure-to-rescue Rates?

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to evaluate failure-to-rescue (FTR) after anastomotic leak (AL) in colectomy patients.

BACKGROUND

In the era of pay for performance, it is imperative that we understand the quality measures under which we are scrutinized. FTR has been proposed as a marker of surgical quality. We investigated the role of complications in FTR rates in colectomy patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent nonemergent colectomy from 2012 to 2013 were identified from the The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP database). Mortality after AL was assessed and stratified in relation to mortality after other postoperative complications. χ and logistic regression analysis were used to assess the effect of AL on mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 30,101 patients who met inclusion criteria, 1127 suffered an AL (3.7%). FTR was increased in patients with AL compared with those without AL (6% vs 1%, P < 0.001). The mortality rate after leak was similar to mortality after other major complications. Independent risk factors for death after AL included older age (odds ratio [OR] 3.140; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.744-5.651), cancer diagnosis (OR 2.032; 95% CI, 1.177-3.507), and open approach (OR 2.124; 95% CI, 1.194-3.776) while preoperative bowel preparation was protective (OR 0.563; 95% CI, 0.328-0.969).

CONCLUSIONS

AL is a common complication after colectomy with a relatively high FTR rate. As hospitals are penalized for not reaching specific rates of FTR, we must better understand these complex relationships to improve quality and safety of patient care.

Risk Factors Associated With Nonclosure of Defunctioning Stomas After Sphincter-Preserving Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Some patients receiving defunctioning stomas will never undergo stoma reversal, but it is difficult to preoperatively predict which patients will be affected.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify the risk factors associated with nonclosure of temporary stomas after sphincter-preserving low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Library databases for all of the studies analyzing risk factors for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas.

STUDY SELECTION

We only included articles published in English in this meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) original article with extractable data, 2) studies including only defunctioning stomas created after low anterior resection for rectal cancer, 3) studies with nonclosure rather than delayed closure as the main end point, and 4) studies analyzing risk factors for nonclosure.

INTERVENTION

Defunctioning stomas were created after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Stoma nonclosure was the only end point, and it included nonclosure and permanent stoma creation after primary stoma closure. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess methodologic quality of the studies, and risk ratios and 95% CIs were used to assess risk factors.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 8568 patients were included. The nonclosure rate was 19% (95% CI, 13%-24%; p < 0.001; I= 96.2%). Three demographic factors were significantly associated with nonclosure: older age (risk ratio= 1.50 (95% CI, 1.12-2.02); p = 0.007; I= 39.3%), ASA score >2 (risk ratio = 1.66 (95% CI, 1.51-1.83); p < 0.001; I= 0%), and comorbidities (risk ratio = 1.58 (95% CI, 1.29-1.95); p < 0.001; I= 52.6%). Surgical complications (risk ratio = 1.89 (95% CI, 1.48-2.41); p < 0.001; I= 29.7%), postoperative anastomotic leakage (risk ratio = 3.39 (95% CI, 2.41-4.75); p < 0.001; I= 53.0%), stage IV tumor (risk ratio = 2.96 (95% CI, 1.73-5.09); p < 0.001; I= 88.1%), and local recurrence (risk ratio = 2.84 (95% CI, 2.11-3.83); p < 0.001; I= 6.8%) were strong clinical risk factors for nonclosure. Open surgery (risk ratio = 1.47 (95% CI, 1.01-2.15); p = 0.044; I= 63.6%) showed a borderline significant association with nonclosure.

LIMITATIONS

Data on some risk factors could not be pooled because of the low number of studies. There was conspicuous heterogeneity between the included studies, so the pooled data were not absolutely free of exaggeration or influence.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, ASA score >2, comorbidities, open surgery, surgical complications, anastomotic leakage, stage IV tumor, and local recurrence are risk factors for nonclosure of defunctioning stomas after low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer, whereas tumor height, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy are not. Patients with these risk factors should be informed preoperatively of the possibility of nonreversal, and joint decision-making is preferred.

Emerging Trends in the Etiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Anastomotic Leakage

Anastomotic leaks represent one of the most alarming complications following any gastrointestinal anastomosis due to the substantial effects on post-operative morbidity and mortality of the patient with long-lasting effects on the functional and oncologic outcomes. There is a lack of consensus related to the definition of an anastomotic leak, with a variety of options for prevention and management. A number of patient-related and technical risk factors have been found to be associated with the development of an anastomotic leak and have inspired the development of various preventative measures and technologies. The International Multispecialty Anastomotic Leak Global Improvement Exchange group was convened to establish a consensus on the definition of an anastomotic leak as well as to discuss the various diagnostic, preventative, and management measures currently available.

Long-term functional outcome of colonic resections: how much does faecal impairment influence quality of life?

AIM

Older data suggest that colonic resection has a negative impact on continence and quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome of colonic resections for colonic cancer and diverticulitis and its influence on quality of life.

METHODS

Patients who underwent colonic resection between 2005 and 2013 were identified from a prospective database. A survey with two questionnaires [Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) scale, Short Form 12 (SF-12)] and additional questions concerning bowel function was sent to all patients.

RESULTS

Colonic resection was performed in 362 patients in the study period; 297 patients returned the questionnaires (response rate 82.0%). Faecal urgency or incontinence more than once a month was present in 15% of patients and 25% of patients reported that bowel symptoms limited their quality of life. The mean total FIQL score for all patients was 3.58. The SF-12 score was comparable to a reference population without prior colonic resection. Patients after right-sided resections had liquid stool more often than others (45.3% vs 38.7%, P = 0.011). No differences in bowel function and quality of life were detected between resections for colonic cancer and diverticulitis.

CONCLUSION

Most patients experience no limitation in bowel function after segmental colectomy. Those with limitations in bowel function still seem to cope well, as the quality of life is not severely affected. Nevertheless, most patients with lower functional scores also had lower quality of life scores. Whether surgery is a relevant factor has to be questioned, as the prevalence of faecal incontinence in a comparable population without prior surgery is almost identical.

Postoperative Complications: Looking Forward to a Safer Future

Colorectal surgery patients frequently suffer from postoperative complications. Patients with complications have been shown to be at higher risk for mortality, poor oncologic outcomes, additional complications, and worse quality of life. Complications are increasingly recognized as markers of quality of care with more use of risk-adjusted national surgical databases and increasing transparency in health care. Quality improvement work in colorectal surgery has identified methods to decrease complication rates and improve outcomes in this patient population. Future work will continue to identify best practices and standardized ways to measure quality of care.

Intersphincteric completion proctectomy with omentoplasty for chronic presacral sinus after low anterior resection for rectal cancer

AIM

This study aimed to determine the clinical outcome of salvage surgery without restoring continuity for symptomatic chronic presacral sinus after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer.

METHOD

Out of a prospective cohort of 46 patients with chronic presacral sinus (> 1 year after LAR), 27 underwent completion proctectomy with omentoplasty between January 2005 and July 2014.

RESULTS

The initial treatment for rectal cancer included neoadjuvant radiotherapy in 26 (96%) patients. Besides a chronic presacral sinus, a secondary fistula was present in 15 (56%) patients. Definitive salvage surgery was performed after a median of 40 (12-350) months from the primary resection. The median hospital stay after single- and multiple-stage salvage surgery was 11 and 17 days. Postoperative complications occurred in 44% of patients. The re-intervention rate was 33% with a range of 1-10 interventions per patient. During a median follow-up of 20 (4-45) months from salvage surgery, healing of the chronic presacral sinus occurred in 78% of patients, with a healing rate after single- and multiple-stage procedures of 88% and 64% respectively (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a symptomatic chronic presacral sinus after LAR for rectal cancer, in whom restoration of continuity is not intended, can be effectively managed by completion proctectomy with complete debridement of the sinus and fistula tracts followed by an omentoplasty to fill the presacral cavity, preferably as a single-stage procedure.

Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metallic stents for rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection: a comparison with proximal diverting ileostomy alone

BACKGROUND

Self-expandable metal stents can be used to treat patients with rectovaginal fistula after colorectal resection for cancer.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with rectovaginal fistula, after colorectal resection for cancer, were treated with endoscopic placement of a self-expandable metal stent. In four patients, a diverting proximal stoma had been performed elsewhere. Mean age was 58 years. All patients had preoperative radiotherapy. In ten patients, the stent was placed as initial form of treatment. Four patients were referred after multiple failed operations. The control group consisted of ten patients who had rectovaginal fistula and underwent proximal diverting ileostomy and percutaneous drainage of the surrounding abscess

RESULTS

One patient was not able to tolerate the stent, which was removed. At a mean follow-up of 22 months, the rectovaginal fistula healed in 12 patients. In the remaining two patients, the fistula has reduced significantly in size to allow a successful flap transposition. The fistula healed only in five out of the ten patients who had only a proximal ileostomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic placement of self-expandable metal stents represents a valid adjunctive to treat patients with rectovaginal fistula, after colorectal resection for cancer.

Risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in mid to low rectal cancer

AIM: To investigate the risk factors causing structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage in patients with mid to low rectal cancer.

METHODS: Prospectively collected data of consecutive subjects who had anastomotic leakage after surgical resection for rectal cancer from March 2006 to May 2013 at Korea University Anam Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Two subgroup analyses were performed. The patients were initially divided into the sequelae (stricture, fistula, or sinus) and no sequelae groups and then divided into the permanent stoma (PS) and no PS groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors of structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage.

RESULTS: Structural sequelae after anastomotic leakage were identified in 29 patients (39.7%). Multivariate analysis revealed that diversion ileostomy at the first operation increases the risk of structural sequelae [odds ratio (OR) = 6.741; P = 0.017]. Fourteen patients (17.7%) had permanent stoma during the follow-up period (median, 37 mo). Multivariate analysis showed that the tumor level from the dentate line was associated with the risk of permanent stoma (OR = 0.751; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION: Diversion ileostomy at the first operation increased the risk of structural sequelae of the anastomosis, while lower tumor location was associated with the risk of permanent stoma in the management of anastomotic leakage.

Smoking as dominant risk factor for anastomotic leak after left colon resection

BACKGROUND

Some risk factors for anastomotic leak have been identified, but the effect of smoking is unknown.

METHODS

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of smoking on clinical leak after left-sided anastomoses. Adult patients who underwent elective left colectomy between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2012 were included. Those with stomas and inflammatory bowel diseases were excluded. Primary outcome was anastomotic leak requiring percutaneous drainage or operative intervention within 30 days.

RESULTS

There were 246 patients included; 56% were female. Most had a diagnosis of diverticular disease (53%) or cancer (37%). Anastomotic leak rate was 6.5% (n = 16). The rate in smokers was 17% versus 5% in nonsmokers (P = .01). Smokers had over 4 times greater chance of leak (odds ratio 4.2, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 13.5, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Smoking is a risk factor for leak after left colectomy. Consideration should be given to delaying elective left colectomy until smoking cessation is achieved.

Diabetes and risk of anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most common and lethal complications in gastrointestinal surgery. However, the relationship between AL risk and diabetes mellitus (DM) remains ambiguous. This meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between DM and AL risk in patients after gastrointestinal resection.

METHODS

Odds ratios (OR) estimate with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined and weighted to produce pooled OR using the fixed-effects model. Relative risks were calculated in subgroup analysis of prospective studies. We calculated publication bias by Begg rank correlation test and Egger linear regression test.

RESULTS

DM was significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of AL morbidity in colorectal patients, 1.661 times in total patients (95% CIs = 1.266-2.178), 1.995 times in a subgroup of case-control studies, 1.581 times in cohort investigations, 1.688 times in retrospective trials, and 1.562 times in prospective designs. After adjusting for the factor of obesity and/or body mass index in the subgroup analyses of colorectal surgery, DM patients without obesity experienced a significantly increased risk of AL (OR = 1.572, 95% CIs = 1.112-2.222). Furthermore, when obesity had not been adjusted, DM patients endured a dramatical increase of AL incidence (OR = 1.812, 95% CIs = 1.171-2.804). Perforation incidence after gastric resection showed borderline association with DM (OR = 2.170, 95% CIs = 0.956-4.926).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis provides strong evidence for the first time that DM is significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of AL mortality in colorectal surgery.

Staple line/anastomotic reinforcement and other adjuncts: do they make a difference?

Since the development of the stapled intestinal anastomosis, efforts have been aimed at reducing complications and standardizing methods. The main complications associated with stapled anastomoses include bleeding, device failure, and anastomotic failure (leaks and strictures). These complications are associated with increased cost of care, increase in cancer recurrence, decreased overall survival, poor quality of life, and in some cases the need for further procedures including a diverting ostomy. Reducing these complications therefore has important implications. To this end, techniques to reduce the incidence of anastomotic complications have been the focus of many investigators. In this review, we summarize the current staple line reinforcement technology as well as other adjunctive measures, and specifically discuss the role of biologic materials in this realm.

Outcomes in non-metastatic colorectal cancer

The measurement of outcomes in non-metastatic colon and rectal cancer patients is a multi-dimensional endeavor involving prediction tools, standard of care, and best treatment guidelines. Socioeconomic, demographic, and racial impacts on outcome must be carefully considered. Consideration must also be given to measures of cost, quality, and healthcare delivery in response to initiatives meant to optimize patient health while maintaining quality of life.