1
|
Romesser PB, Cercek A. Optimizing Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Path Towards Personalization. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:831-835. [PMID: 39271253 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Romesser
- Colorectal and Anal Cancer Service, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rao C, Sun Myint A. Watch and Wait is Changing: We Need to Change How We Count Costs. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-16175-y. [PMID: 39222299 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16175-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Accepted: 08/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Rao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK.
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Arthur Sun Myint
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meyer VM, Bosch N, van der Heijden JAG, Kalkdijk-Dijkstra AJ, Pierie JPEN, Beets GL, Broens PMA, Klarenbeek BR, van Westreenen HL. Long-Term Functional Outcome After Early vs. Late Stoma Closure in Rectal Cancer Surgery: Sub-analysis of the Multicenter FORCE Trial. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:1266-1273. [PMID: 38922517 PMCID: PMC11347459 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-024-01062-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to assess the effect of early stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. METHODS Patients participating in the FORCE trial who underwent LAR with protective stoma were included in this study. Patients were subdivided into an early closure group (< 3 months) and late closure group (> 3 months). Endpoints of this study were the Wexner Incontinence, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), EORTC QLQ-CR29, and fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scores at 1 year. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2020, 38 patients had received a diverting stoma after LAR for rectal cancer and could be included. There was no significant difference in LARS (31 vs. 30, p = 0.63) and Wexner score (6.2 vs. 5.8, p = 0.77) between the early and late closure groups. Time to stoma closure in days was not a predictor for LARS (R2 = 0.001, F (1,36) = 0.049, p = 0.83) or Wexner score (R2 = 0.008, F (1,36) = 0.287, p = 0.60) after restored continuity. There was no significant difference between any of the FIQL domains of lifestyle, coping, depression, and embarrassment. In the EORTC QLQ-29, body image scored higher in the late closure group (21.3 vs. 1.6, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Timing of stoma closure does not appear to affect long-term bowel function and quality of life, except for body image. To improve functional outcome, attention should be focused on other contributing factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V M Meyer
- Dept of Surgery, Isala Hospitals, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
- Dept of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - N Bosch
- Dept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J A G van der Heijden
- Dept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A J Kalkdijk-Dijkstra
- Dept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J P E N Pierie
- Post Graduate School of Medicine (PGSOM), University Medical Center Groningen and University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Dept of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Henri Dunantweg 2, 8934 AD, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | - G L Beets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - P M A Broens
- Dept of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, PO Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - B R Klarenbeek
- Dept of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H L van Westreenen
- Dept of Surgery, Isala Hospitals, Dokter Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Murshed I, Bunjo Z, Seow W, Murshed I, Bedrikovetski S, Thomas M, Sammour T. Economic Evaluation of 'Watch and Wait' Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-16056-4. [PMID: 39181996 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16056-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Owing to multimodal treatment and complex surgery, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) exerts a large healthcare burden. Watch and wait (W&W) may be cost saving by removing the need for surgery and inpatient care. This systematic review seeks to identify the economic impact of W&W, compared with standard care, in patients achieving a complete clinical response (cCR) following neoadjuvant therapy for LARC. METHODS The PubMed, OVID Medline, OVID Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from inception to 26 April 2024. All economic evaluations (EEs) that compared W&W with standard care were included. Reporting and methodological quality was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS), BMJ and Philips checklists. Narrative synthesis was performed. Primary and secondary outcomes were (incremental) cost-effectiveness ratios and the net financial cost. RESULTS Of 1548 studies identified, 27 were assessed for full-text eligibility and 12 studies from eight countries (2016-2024) were included. Seven cost-effectiveness analyses (complete EEs) and five cost analyses (partial EEs) utilized model-based (n = 7) or trial-based (n = 5) analytics with significant variations in methodological design and reporting quality. W&W showed consistent cost effectiveness (n = 7) and cost saving (n = 12) compared with surgery from third-party payer and patient perspectives. Critical parameters identified by uncertainty analysis were rates of local and distant recurrence in W&W, salvage surgery, perioperative mortality and utilities assigned to W&W and surgery. CONCLUSION Despite heterogenous methodological design and reporting quality, W&W is likely to be cost effective and cost saving compared with standard care following cCR in LARC. Clinical Trials Registration PROSPERO CRD42024513874.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishraq Murshed
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Zachary Bunjo
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Warren Seow
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ishmam Murshed
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michelle Thomas
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gaetani RS, Ladin K, Abelson JS. Journey through the Decades: The Evolution in Treatment and Shared Decision Making for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2807. [PMID: 39199579 PMCID: PMC11353159 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2024] [Revised: 08/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of locally advanced rectal cancer has undergone significant transformations over the decades and optimal treatment approaches continue to evolve. There have been numerous advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy from the first description of the abdominoperineal resection in 1908, timing of chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the late 20th and early 21st century, and most recently, the introduction of organ preservation or nonoperative management in 2004. Alongside these advancements, the concept of shared decision making in medicine has evolved, prompting a focus on patient-centered care. This evolution in practice has been fueled by a growing recognition of the importance of patient autonomy and the alignment of treatment options with patients' values and preferences. With the growing number of possible treatment options, variability in patient counseling exists, highlighting the need for a standardized approach to shared decision making in locally advanced rectal cancer. This narrative review will describe the evolution of treatment options of locally advanced rectal cancer as well as the concept of shared decision making and decision aids, and will introduce a decision aid for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who have achieved a complete clinical response and are eligible for watch and wait.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Racquel S. Gaetani
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA;
| | - Keren Ladin
- Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA 02155, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Abelson
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA 01805, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rizzo G, Amodio LE, D'Annibale G, Marzi F, Quero G, Menghi R, Tondolo V. Nonoperative management and local excision after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer. Minerva Surg 2024; 79:470-480. [PMID: 38953759 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.24.10445-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
Locally advanced extraperitoneal rectal cancer represents a significant clinical challenge, and currently, the standard treatment is based on neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT) followed by radical surgical resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). In the last 30 years, its management has undergone significant changes due to the improvement of complementary radio- and chemotherapy treatments, the improvement of minimally invasive surgical approaches and the diffusion of organ-sparing approaches, such as nonoperative management, commonly called "watch and wait" (NOM) and local excision (LE), in highly selected patients who achieve a major or complete response to neoadjuvant CRT. This review aimed to critically examine the efficacy and oncological safety of NOM and LE compared to those of standard TME in rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant CRT. Both the pros and cons of these approaches were strictly analyzed, providing a comprehensive and critical overview of these novel management strategies for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Rizzo
- Unit of Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy -
| | - Luca E Amodio
- Unit of Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giorgio D'Annibale
- Unit of Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Marzi
- Unit of Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Quero
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberta Menghi
- Unit of Digestive Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tondolo
- Unit of Digestive and Colorectal Surgery, Ospedale Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isola, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alvarez JA, Shi Q, Dasari A, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sanoff H, George TJ, Hong T, Yothers G, Philip P, Nelson G, Al Baghdadi T, Alese OB, Zambare W, Omer D, Verheij FS, Bercz A, Kim MJ, Buckley J, Williams H, George M, Garcia R, Gallagher P, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Crawley J, Shergill A, Horvat N, Romesser PB, Hall W, Smith JJ. Alliance A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:901. [PMID: 39060961 PMCID: PMC11282593 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12529-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after TNT may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes. METHODS In this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N +) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N + vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3-4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8-12 (± 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 312 evaluable patients (156 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect a 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha = 0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse event rates. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and had accrued 330 patients as of May 2024. Study support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . DISCUSSION Building on data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet A Alvarez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | - Arvind Dasari
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Hanna Sanoff
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Wini Zambare
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Dana Omer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Floris S Verheij
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Aron Bercz
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Min Jung Kim
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - James Buckley
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Hannah Williams
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Manju George
- COLONTOWN/Paltown Development Foundation, Crownsville, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | - Natally Horvat
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - William Hall
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, SR-201, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
González Del Portillo E, Couñago F, López-Campos F. Neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer: Where we are and where we are going. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:790-795. [PMID: 39071468 PMCID: PMC11271721 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Locally advanced rectal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach based on total neoadjuvant treatment with radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (ChT), followed by deferred surgery. Currently, alternatives to the standard total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) are being explored, such as new ChT regimens or the introduction of immunotherapy. With standard TNT, up to a third of patients may achieve a complete pathological response (CPR), potentially avoiding surgery. However, as of now, we lack predictive markers of response that would allow us to define criteria for a conservative organ strategy. The presence of mutations, genes, or new imaging tests is helping to define these criteria. An example of this is the diffusion coefficient in the diffusion-weighted sequence of magnetic resonance imaging and the integration of this imaging technique into RT treatment. This allows for the monitoring of the evolution of this coefficient over successive RT sessions, helping to determine which patients will achieve CPR or those who may require intensification of neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Madrid, Madrid 28010, Spain
| | - Fernando López-Campos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón Y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maksim R, Buczyńska A, Sidorkiewicz I, Krętowski AJ, Sierko E. Imaging and Metabolic Diagnostic Methods in the Stage Assessment of Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2553. [PMID: 39061192 PMCID: PMC11275086 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 07/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer (RC) is a prevalent malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality rates. The accurate staging of RC is crucial for optimal treatment planning and patient outcomes. This review aims to summarize the current literature on imaging and metabolic diagnostic methods used in the stage assessment of RC. Various imaging modalities play a pivotal role in the initial evaluation and staging of RC. These include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and endorectal ultrasound (ERUS). MRI has emerged as the gold standard for local staging due to its superior soft tissue resolution and ability to assess tumor invasion depth, lymph node involvement, and the presence of extramural vascular invasion. CT imaging provides valuable information about distant metastases and helps determine the feasibility of surgical resection. ERUS aids in assessing tumor depth, perirectal lymph nodes, and sphincter involvement. Understanding the strengths and limitations of each diagnostic modality is essential for accurate staging and treatment decisions in RC. Furthermore, the integration of multiple imaging and metabolic methods, such as PET/CT or PET/MRI, can enhance diagnostic accuracy and provide valuable prognostic information. Thus, a literature review was conducted to investigate and assess the effectiveness and accuracy of diagnostic methods, both imaging and metabolic, in the stage assessment of RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafał Maksim
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Skłodowska-Curie Białystok Oncology Center, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland;
| | - Angelika Buczyńska
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland; (A.B.); (A.J.K.)
| | - Iwona Sidorkiewicz
- Clinical Research Support Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland;
| | - Adam Jacek Krętowski
- Clinical Research Centre, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland; (A.B.); (A.J.K.)
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
| | - Ewa Sierko
- Department of Oncology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
- Department of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Bialystok, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ivatury SJ, Suwanabol PA, Roo ACD. Shared Decision-Making, Sphincter Preservation, and Rectal Cancer Treatment: Identifying and Executing What Matters Most to Patients. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:256-265. [PMID: 38882940 PMCID: PMC11178388 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Rectal cancer treatment often encompasses multiple steps and options, with benefits and risks that vary based on the individual. Additionally, patients facing rectal cancer often have preferences regarding overall quality of life, which includes bowel function, sphincter preservation, and ostomies. This article reviews these data in the context of shared decision-making approaches in an effort to better inform patients deliberating treatment options for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivas Joga Ivatury
- Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, University of Texas at Austin Dell Medical School, Austin, Texas
| | | | - Ana C. De Roo
- Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rajeev-Kumar G, Katipally RR, Li S, Shogan BD, Olortegui KS, Chin J, Polite BN, Liauw SL. Point/Counterpoint #2: Current Clinical Considerations With Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer. Cancer J 2024; 30:256-263. [PMID: 39042777 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Locally advanced rectal cancer has historically been treated with multimodal therapy consisting of radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision. However, recent prospective trials and registry studies have demonstrated similar disease outcomes with nonoperative management for patients who experience an excellent clinical response to radiation and chemotherapy. This article reviews data regarding nonoperative management for rectal cancer, and highlights current challenges and limitations in a point-counterpoint format, in the context of two clinical cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Shen Li
- Sections of Surgical Oncology
| | | | | | - Janet Chin
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Blase N Polite
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Garfinkle RC, McKenna NP. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome following Restorative Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Can the Surgeon Have Any Meaningful Impact? Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2307. [PMID: 39001370 PMCID: PMC11240414 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Postoperative bowel dysfunction following restorative proctectomy, commonly referred to as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is a common long term sequela of rectal cancer treatment. While many of the established risk factors for LARS are non-modifiable, others may be well within the surgeon's control. Several pre-, intra-, and postoperative decisions may have a significant impact on postoperative bowel function. Some of these factors include the extent of surgical resection, surgical approach, choice of anastomotic reconstruction, and use of fecal diversion. This review article summarizes the available evidence regarding how surgical decision-making can affect postoperative bowel function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nicholas P. McKenna
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Weinberg BA, Sackstein PE, Yu J, Kim RD, Sommovilla J, Amarnath SR, Krishnamurthi SS. Evolving Standards of Care in the Management of Localized Colorectal Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e432034. [PMID: 38768426 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_432034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of patients with localized rectal cancer is complex and requires input from a multidisciplinary team. Baseline local staging and mismatch repair protein testing are vital to develop individualized treatment plans. There are multiple options in terms of treatment modalities and sequencing, including transanal excision, short-course radiation, long-course chemoradiation, chemotherapy doublet or triplet, nonoperative management, and immune checkpoint blockade for patients with mismatch repair deficient tumors. While localized colon cancer is typically treated with surgical resection and consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy, emerging data suggest that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be beneficial in patients with higher-risk disease. Quality-of-life considerations are imperative to prevent potential chronic effects on psychosocial health, neuropathy, fertility, and bowel, bladder, and sexual function. The omission of radiation or surgery can mitigate these toxicities without diminishing oncologic outcomes. The optimal treatment plan and sequence is not a one-size-fits-all approach but rather should be personalized to the patient's disease burden, tumor location, comorbidities, and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Weinberg
- Ruesch Center for Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - Paul E Sackstein
- Ruesch Center for Cure of Gastrointestinal Cancers, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC
| | - James Yu
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Richard D Kim
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Joshua Sommovilla
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | - Sudha R Amarnath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anker CJ, Tchelebi LT, Selfridge JE, Jabbour SK, Akselrod D, Cataldo P, Abood G, Berlin J, Hallemeier CL, Jethwa KR, Kim E, Kennedy T, Lee P, Sharma N, Small W, Williams VM, Russo S. Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00673-4. [PMID: 38797496 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
For patients with rectal cancer, the standard approach of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery (trimodality therapy) is associated with significant long-term toxicity and/or colostomy for most patients. Patient options focused on quality of life (QOL) have dramatically improved, but there remains limited guidance regarding comparative effectiveness. This systematic review and associated guidelines evaluate how various treatment strategies compare to each other in terms of oncologic outcomes and QOL. Cochrane and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology were used to search for prospective and retrospective trials and meta-analyses of adequate quality within the Ovid Medline database between January 1, 2012, and June 15, 2023. These studies informed the expert panel, which rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 6 clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). The search process yielded 197 articles that advised voting. Increasing data have shown that nonoperative management (NOM) and primary surgery result in QOL benefits noted over trimodality therapy without detriment to oncologic outcomes. For patients with rectal cancer for whom total mesorectal excision would result in permanent colostomy or inadequate bowel continence, NOM was strongly recommended as usually appropriate. Restaging with tumor response assessment approximately 8 to 12 weeks after completion of radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy was deemed a necessary component of NOM. The panel recommended active surveillance in the setting of a near-complete or complete response. In the setting of NOM, 54 to 56 Gy in 27 to 31 fractions concurrent with chemotherapy and followed by consolidation chemotherapy was recommended. The panel strongly recommends primary surgery as usually appropriate for a T3N0 high rectal tumor for which low anterior resection and adequate bowel function is possible, with adjuvant chemotherapy considered if N+. Recent data support NOM and primary surgery as important options that should be offered to eligible patients. Considering the complexity of multidisciplinary management, patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, and therapy should be tailored to individual patient goals/values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Leila T Tchelebi
- Northwell, New Hyde Park, New York; Department of Radiation Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York.
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Dmitriy Akselrod
- Department of Radiology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Peter Cataldo
- Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Gerard Abood
- Department of Surgery, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Jordan Berlin
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Medicine Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Vonetta M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MetroHealth, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Smith HG, Nilsson PJ, Shogan BD, Harji D, Gambacorta MA, Romano A, Brandl A, Qvortrup C. Neoadjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer: comprehensive review. BJS Open 2024; 8:zrae038. [PMID: 38747103 PMCID: PMC11094476 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant therapy has an established role in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. However, its role continues to evolve due to both advances in the available treatment modalities, and refinements in the indications for neoadjuvant treatment and subsequent surgery. METHODS A narrative review of the most recent relevant literature was conducted. RESULTS Short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy have an established role in improving local but not systemic disease control in patients with rectal cancer. Total neoadjuvant therapy offers advantages over short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy, not only in terms of increased local response but also in reducing the risk of systemic relapses. Non-operative management is increasingly preferred to surgery in patients with rectal cancer and clinical complete responses but is still associated with some negative impacts on functional outcomes. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be of some benefit in patients with locally advanced colon cancer with proficient mismatch repair, although patient selection is a major challenge. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with deficient mismatch repair cancers in the colon or rectum is altering the treatment paradigm for these patients. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant treatments for patients with colon or rectal cancers continue to evolve, increasing the complexity of decision-making for patients and clinicians alike. This review describes the current guidance and most recent developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry G Smith
- Abdominalcenter K, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per J Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet and Dept. of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Benjamin D Shogan
- Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Deena Harji
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Camilla Qvortrup
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alvarez J, Shi Q, Dasari A, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sanoff H, George TJ, Hong TS, Yothers G, Philip PA, Nelson GD, Al Baghdadi T, Alese O, Zambare W, Omer DM, Verheij FS, Buckley J, Williams H, George M, Garcia R, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Shergill A, Horvat N, Romesser PB, Hall WA, Smith JJ. ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.04.25.24306396. [PMID: 38712176 PMCID: PMC11071544 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.25.24306396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Background Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes. Methods In this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N+) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N+ vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3-4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8-12 (+/- 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 296 evaluable patients (148 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect an 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha=0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse effects. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat in EDTA tubes, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and has a current accrual of 312. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Discussion Building off of data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed the current trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163 ; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG).
Collapse
|
17
|
Yu G, Chi H, Zhao G, Wang Y. Tumor regression and safe distance of distal margin after neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1375334. [PMID: 38638858 PMCID: PMC11024319 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1375334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Neoadjuvant therapy has been widely employed in the treatment of rectal cancer, demonstrating its utility in reducing tumor volume, downstaging tumors, and improving patient prognosis. It has become the standard preoperative treatment modality for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy varies significantly among patients, with notable differences in tumor regression outcomes. In some cases, patients exhibit substantial tumor regression, even achieving pathological complete response. The assessment of tumor regression outcomes holds crucial significance for determining surgical approaches and establishing safe margins. Nonetheless, current research on tumor regression patterns remains limited, and there is considerable controversy surrounding the determination of a safe margin after neoadjuvant therapy. In light of these factors, this study aims to summarize the primary patterns of tumor regression observed following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer, categorizing them into three types: tumor shrinkage, tumor fragmentation, and mucinous lake formation. Furthermore, a comparison will be made between gross and microscopic tumor regression, highlighting the asynchronous nature of regression in the two contexts. Additionally, this study will analyze the safety of non-surgical treatment in patients who achieve complete clinical response, elucidating the necessity of surgical intervention. Lastly, the study will investigate the optimal range for safe surgical resection margins and explore the concept of a safe margin distance post-neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guilin Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Huanyu Chi
- Department of General Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
- The Second Clinical College, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Guohua Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| | - Yue Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Safont MJ, García-Figueiras R, Hernando-Requejo O, Jimenez-Rodriguez R, Lopez-Vicente J, Machado I, Ayuso JR, Bustamante-Balén M, De Torres-Olombrada MV, Domínguez Tristancho JL, Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Suarez J, Vera R. Interdisciplinary Spanish consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:825-835. [PMID: 37787973 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03322-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Watch-and-wait has emerged as a new strategy for the management of rectal cancer when a complete clinical response is achieved after neoadjuvant therapy. In an attempt to standardize this new clinical approach, initiated by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD), and with the participation of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP), the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (SEED), the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), we present herein a consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for the management of rectal cancer. We have focused on patient selection, the treatment schemes evaluated, the optimal timing for evaluating the clinical complete response, the oncologic outcomes after the implementation of this strategy, and a protocol for surveillance of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jose Safont
- Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. Valencia University, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, 46014, València, Spain.
| | - Roberto García-Figueiras
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | - Jorge Lopez-Vicente
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Mostoles, Mósteles, Spain
| | - Isidro Machado
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
- Pathology Department, Patologika Laboratory QuironSalud, Valencia, Spain
- Pathology Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Mª Jesús Fernández-Aceñero
- Surgical Pathology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdiSSC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Suarez
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación (Idisna), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wurschi GW, Rühle A, Domschikowski J, Trommer M, Ferdinandus S, Becker JN, Boeke S, Sonnhoff M, Fink CA, Käsmann L, Schneider M, Bockelmann E, Krug D, Nicolay NH, Fabian A, Pietschmann K. Patient-Relevant Costs for Organ Preservation versus Radical Resection in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1281. [PMID: 38610958 PMCID: PMC11011197 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an evolving treatment schedule for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), allowing for organ preservation in a relevant number of patients in the case of complete response. Patients who undergo this so-called "watch and wait" approach are likely to benefit regarding their quality of life (QoL), especially if definitive ostomy could be avoided. In this work, we performed the first cost-effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective to compare costs for TNT with radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in the German health care system. Individual costs for patients insured with a statutory health insurance were calculated with a Markov microsimulation. A subgroup analysis from the prospective "FinTox" trial was used to calibrate the model's parameters. We found that TNT was less expensive (-1540 EUR) and simultaneously resulted in a better QoL (+0.64 QALYs) during treatment and 5-year follow-up. The average cost for patients under TNT was 4711 EUR per year, which was equivalent to 3.2% of the net household income. CRT followed by resection resulted in higher overall costs for ostomy care, medication and greater loss of earnings. Overall, TNT appeared to be more efficacious and cost-effective from a patient's point of view in the German health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg W. Wurschi
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany;
- Clinician Scientist Program, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg—Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany (A.F.)
| | - Maike Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Ferdinandus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Becker
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Sonnhoff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Center for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 28239 Bremen, Germany
| | - Christoph A. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Schneider
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Elodie Bockelmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany (A.F.)
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany (A.F.)
| | - Klaus Pietschmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany;
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 07747 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gao Z, Zhu Z, Li K. Immunoscore Biopsy in Patients With Rectal Cancer Managed by a Watch-and-Wait Strategy. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:1088. [PMID: 38306588 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ziming Gao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhi Zhu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Loria A, Ramsdale EE, Aquina CT, Cupertino P, Mohile SG, Fleming FJ. From Clinical Trials to Practice: Anticipating and Overcoming Challenges in Implementing Watch-and-Wait for Rectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:876-880. [PMID: 38315943 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Loria
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Erika E Ramsdale
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Christopher T Aquina
- Departments of Colorectal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, FL
| | - Paula Cupertino
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Fergal J Fleming
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shen Y, Wen Y, Bi L, Yang X, Gong X, Deng X, Meng W, Wang Z. Do treated rectal tumors appear differently on MRI after chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:774-782. [PMID: 37999742 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-04115-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Increasing studies have focused on neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in rectal cancer. However, few studies explored the differences in radiographic variation between patients treated with NCT and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). METHODS Stage II/III rectal cancer patients from March 2016 to December 2019 meeting the criteria treated with NCRT or NCT were included. MRI features, including tumor location, longitudinal length, DWI signal, MRI tumor regression grade (mrTRG), and radiomic texture features, before and after neoadjuvant treatments were reviewed. RESULTS 116 patients with NCRT and 61 with NCT were analyzed. Among these patients, 46 patients in the NCRT group and 18 in the NCT group were responders with pathological TRG0-1. Within these responders, the mean tumor longitudinal length regression rate (TLRR) of the NCT group was 60.08 ± 11.17%, which was significantly higher than the 50.73 ± 15.28% of the NCRT group (p = 0.010). The proportion of high signal in the DWI image after NCT was higher than that of the NCRT group (88.89% vs 50.00%, p = 0.004). NCT responders had significantly higher median change rates than those of NCRT responders in 11 radiomic features, especially those shape features. CONCLUSION MRI images change differently between responders treated with NCRT and those with NCT in rectal cancer. The tumor volumetry and some radiomic features change more obviously in NCT responders, and the tumor signal changes more obviously in NCRT responders. During the evaluation of the response of the tumor to the neoadjuvant treatments, images of patients should be treated differently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Shen
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Yanqiong Wen
- Operating Room, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Liang Bi
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Xuyang Yang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaoling Gong
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiangbing Deng
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Wenjian Meng
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| | - Ziqiang Wang
- Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37, Guo Xue Street, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bedrikovetski S, Traeger L, Fitzsimmons T, Price TJ, Ruszkiewicz AR, Vather R, Sammour T. Association Between RAS/BRAF Mutations and Complete Response Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicentered Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1681-1689. [PMID: 38071720 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14722-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of RAS/BRAF mutation on primary response rates after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with advanced rectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess complete response rates after TNT according to RAS/BRAF mutation status. METHODS A prospective observational study was performed in patients with rectal cancer who underwent TNT with curative intent at three South Australian hospitals between 2019 and 2023. Patients were classified according to their mutation status: mutant RAS/BRAF (mutRAS) or wild-type RAS/BRAF (wtRAS). The primary endpoint was overall complete response (oCR) rate, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved clinical complete response (cCR) and/or pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS Of the 150 patients eligible for inclusion, 80 patients with RAS/BRAF status available were identified. Of these, 43 (53.8%) patients were classified as mutRAS and 37 (46.3%) patients as wtRAS. Patients with mutRAS had significantly lower cCR and oCR rates after TNT than patients with wtRAS (14% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.014; 11.6% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in pCR rate between the groups. Of the 80 rectal cancer patients tested, 35 (43.8%) had metastatic disease (M1). There was no significant difference in complete M1 response rates between the groups (17.6% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.254). CONCLUSION RAS/BRAF mutations negatively impact primary tumor response rates after TNT in patients with advanced rectal cancer. Large-scale national studies are needed to determine whether RAS/BRAF status could be used to select optimal oncologic therapy in rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Luke Traeger
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tracy Fitzsimmons
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Timothy J Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew R Ruszkiewicz
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Surgical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ryash Vather
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dang H, Verhoeven DA, Boonstra JJ, van Leerdam ME. Management after non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 68:101895. [PMID: 38522888 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Since the introduction of population-based screening, increasing numbers of T1 rectal cancers are detected and removed by local endoscopic resection. Patients can be cured with endoscopic resection alone, but there is a possibility of residual tumor cells remaining after the initial resection. These can be located intraluminally at the resection site or extraluminally in the form of (lymph node) metastases. To decrease the risk of residual cells progressing towards more advanced disease, additional treatment is usually needed. However, with the currently available risk stratification models, it remains challenging to determine who should and should not be further treated after non-curative endoscopic resection. In this review, the different management strategies for patients with non-curatively treated T1 rectal cancers are discussed, along with the available evidence for each strategy and relevant considerations for clinical decision making. Furthermore, we provide practical guidance on the management and surveillance following non-curative endoscopic resection of T1 rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Dang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Daan A Verhoeven
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jurjen J Boonstra
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Emile SH, Ragheb J. Toward less invasive coloproctology: The future is out there. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:199-203. [PMID: 38314131 PMCID: PMC10835533 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i3.199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Medical care has undergone remarkable improvements over the past few decades. One of the most important innovative breakthroughs in modern medicine is the advent of minimally and less invasive treatments. The trend towards employing less invasive treatment has been vividly shown in the field of gastroenterology, particularly coloproctology. Parallel to foregut interventions, colorectal surgery has shifted towards a minimally invasive approach. Coloproctology, including both medical and surgical management of colorectal diseases, has undergone a remarkable paradigm shift. The treatment of both benign and malignant colorectal conditions has gradually transitioned towards more conservative and less invasive approaches. An interesting paradigm shift was the trend to avoid the need for radical resection of rectal cancer altogether in patients who showed complete response to neoadjuvant treatment. The trend of adopting less invasive approaches to treat various colorectal conditions does not seem to be stopping soon as further research on novel, more effective and safer methods is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sameh Hany Emile
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, United States
| | - Jonathan Ragheb
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL 33331, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Geubels BM, van Triest B, Peters FP, Maas M, Beets GL, Marijnen CAM, Custers PA, Rutten HJT, Theuws JCM, Verrijssen ASE, Cnossen JS, Burger JWA, Grotenhuis BA. Optimisation of Organ Preservation treatment strategies in patients with rectal cancer with a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy: Additional contact X-ray brachytherapy versus eXtending the observation period and local excision (OPAXX) - protocol for two multicentre, parallel, single-arm, phase II studies. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e076866. [PMID: 38159950 PMCID: PMC10759064 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Standard treatment for patients with intermediate or locally advanced rectal cancer is (chemo)radiotherapy followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery. In recent years, organ preservation aiming at improving quality of life has been explored. Patients with a complete clinical response to (chemo)radiotherapy can be managed safely with a watch-and-wait approach. However, the optimal organ-preserving treatment strategy for patients with a good, but not complete clinical response remains unclear. The aim of the OPAXX study is to determine the rate of organ preservation that can be achieved in patients with rectal cancer with a good clinical response after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy by additional local treatment options. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The OPAXX study is a Dutch multicentre study that investigates the efficacy of two additional local treatments aiming at organ preservation in patients with a good, but not complete response to neoadjuvant treatment (ie near-complete response or a small residual tumour mass <3 cm). The sample size will be 168 patients in total. Patients will be randomised (1:1) between two parallel single-arm phase II studies: study arm 1 involves additional contact X-ray brachytherapy (an intraluminal radiation boost), while in study arm 2 the observation period is extended followed by a second response evaluation and optional transanal local excision. The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of successful organ preservation at 1 year following randomisation. Secondary endpoints include toxicity, morbidity, oncological and functional outcomes at 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Finally, an observational cohort study for patients who are not eligible for randomisation is conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial protocol has been approved by the medical ethics committee of the Netherlands Cancer Institute (METC20.1276/M20PAX). Informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The trial results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05772923.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara M Geubels
- Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | | - Femke P Peters
- Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Radiation-Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Petra A Custers
- Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Miranda J, Causa Andrieu P, Nincevic J, Gomes de Farias LDP, Khasawneh H, Arita Y, Stanietzky N, Fernandes MC, De Castria TB, Horvat N. Advances in MRI-Based Assessment of Rectal Cancer Post-Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med 2023; 13:172. [PMID: 38202179 PMCID: PMC10780006 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with neoadjuvant therapy playing a pivotal role in improving resectability and patient outcomes. MRI serves as a critical tool in assessing treatment response. However, differentiating viable tumor tissue from therapy-induced changes on MRI remains a complex task. In this comprehensive review, we explore treatment options for rectal cancer based on resectability status, focusing on the role of MRI in guiding therapeutic decisions. We delve into the nuances of MRI-based evaluation of treatment response following neoadjuvant therapy, paying particular attention to emerging techniques like radiomics. Drawing from our insights based on the literature, we provide essential recommendations for post-neoadjuvant therapy management of rectal cancer, all within the context of MRI-based findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao Miranda
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
- Department of Radiology, University of Sao Paulo, R. Dr. Ovidio Pires de Campos, 75 Cerqueira Cesar, Sao Paulo 05403-010, Brazil
| | - Pamela Causa Andrieu
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Josip Nincevic
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
| | - Lucas de Padua Gomes de Farias
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Sirio-Libanes, Rua Dona Adma Jafet, 91—Bela Vista, Sao Paulo 01308-050, Brazil;
- Department of Radiology, Allianca Saude, Av. Pres. Juscelino Kubitschek, 1830, Sao Paulo 01308-050, Brazil
| | - Hala Khasawneh
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA;
| | - Yuki Arita
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan
| | - Nir Stanietzky
- Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Maria Clara Fernandes
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
| | - Tiago Biachi De Castria
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffit Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA;
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| | - Natally Horvat
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; (J.N.); (Y.A.); (M.C.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Welten VM, Dabekaussen KFAA, Miller MO, Yoo J, Irani JL, Goldberg JE, Bleday R, Reich AJ, Davids JS, Melnitchouk N. Patient Values and Goals Regarding Treatment for Rectal Cancer: a Mixed Methods Study. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:3088-3091. [PMID: 37783908 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05818-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa M Welten
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA.
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kirsten F A A Dabekaussen
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
| | - Miquell O Miller
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
| | - James Yoo
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Irani
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
| | - Joel E Goldberg
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
| | - Ronald Bleday
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
| | - Amanda J Reich
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer S Davids
- Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, 02115, MA, USA
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Nilbert M, Eberhard J, Engdahl Severin J, Edelhamre M, Torle F, Korkocic D, Jörgren F. Surgical decision-making following neoadjuvant immunotherapy for dMMR rectal cancer; case reports and review of the literature. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1945-1951. [PMID: 37966970 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2281005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mef Nilbert
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
- Department of Hemathology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital Cancer Centre, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jakob Eberhard
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
- Department of Hemathology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital Cancer Centre, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Marcus Edelhamre
- Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| | - Filip Torle
- Department of Radiology, Helsingborg Hospital, Sweden
| | | | - Fredrik Jörgren
- Department of Surgery, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sawada N, Mukai S, Takehara Y, Misawa M, Kudo T, Hayashi T, Wakamura K, Enami Y, Miyachi H, Baba T, Ishida F, Kudo SE. The "Watch and Wait" Method After Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Requiring Abdominoperineal Resection. Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:765-772. [PMID: 38187830 PMCID: PMC10767130 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01831-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The present study examined the therapeutic effects of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) and predictive factors for complete clinical remission, compared the prognosis and costs of abdominoperineal resection (APR) and the "watch and wait" method (WW), and evaluated the usefulness of WW. In our department, patients with stage II-III lower rectal cancer requiring APR receive NACRT. NACRT was performed as a preoperative treatment (52 Gy + S-1: 80-120 mg/day × 25 days). Eight weeks after the completion of NACRT, rectal examination, endoscopic, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging findings were evaluated to assess its therapeutic effects. APR was indicated for patients in whom endoscopic findings suggested a residual tumor in which a deep ulcer or marginal swelling remained or lymph node metastasis. However, WW was selected for patients who refused APR after informed consent was obtained. In the APR and WW groups, 5- and 20-year treatment costs after CRT were calculated using the Medical Fee Points of Japan in 2020. No significant differences were observed in 3-year disease-free survival rates for either parameter between the two groups. Regarding expenses, treatment costs were lower in the WW group than in the APR group. Organ preservation using active surveillance with CRT for rectal cancer requiring APR is feasible with the achievement of endoluminal complete remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naruhiko Sawada
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Shumpei Mukai
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Yusuke Takehara
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Masashi Misawa
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Toyoki Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Takemasa Hayashi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Kunihiko Wakamura
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Yuta Enami
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Hideyuki Miyachi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Baba
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Fumio Ishida
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| | - Shin-ei Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, 35-1, Tsuzuki-Ku, Chigasakichuo, Yokohama City, Kanagawa, 224-8503 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Boustani J, Huguet F, Vendrely V. Practice-changing clinical trials in radiation oncology for gastrointestinal malignancies in 2021-2023. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:768-777. [PMID: 38415359 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Gastrointestinal cancers are one of the most frequent cancers and a leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. We provide an overview of the most important practice-changing trials that were either published or presented at the international scientific meetings in 2021-2023. Highlights included reports on three phase III trials (CONCORDE/PRODIGE 26, ARTDECO, and a study by Xu et al.) that evaluated dose escalation in the definitive setting for locally advanced oesophageal cancers, as well as two phase III trials that evaluated the role of chemotherapy (neo-AEGIS) and targeted therapy (NRG/RTOG 1010) in the neoadjuvant setting for adenocarcinoma oesophageal cancers or gastroesophageal junction cancer. CheckMate 577 evaluated nivolumab in patients who had residual pathological disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by complete resection. The use of radiation therapy for borderline and locally advanced pancreatic cancer is also discussed (SMART and CONKO-007 trials). Stereotactic body radiation therapy followed by sorafenib was compared to sorafenib alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the NRG/RTOG 1112 study. New options in the management of rectal cancer are emerging such as total neoadjuvant treatment (PRODIGE 23, RAPIDO, PROSPECT), organ preservation (OPRA, OPERA), and the role of immunotherapy in patients with DNA mismatch-repair deficient/microsatellite instability. Finally, preliminary results of the ACT 4 trial that evaluated de-escalation in anal cancer are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Boustani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Besançon, Besançon, France; Inserm, EFS BFC, UMR 1098, RIGHT, Greffon-hôte-tumeur interactions/Ingénierie cellulaire et génique, université de Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
| | - F Huguet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, Paris, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre hospitalier universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France; BoRdeaux Institute of onCology (BRIC), UMR1312, Inserm, université de Bordeaux, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meillat H, Garnier J, Palen A, Ewald J, de Chaisemartin C, Tyran M, Mitry E, Lelong B. Organ sparing to cure stage IV rectal cancer: A case report and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2619-2626. [PMID: 38111764 PMCID: PMC10725537 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal sparing is an option for some rectal cancers with complete or good response after chemoradiotherapy (CRT); however, it has never been evaluated in patients with metastases. We assessed long-term outcomes of a rectal-sparing approach in a liver-first strategy for patients with rectal cancer with resectable liver metastases. CASE SUMMARY We examined patients who underwent an organ-sparing approach for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases using a liver-first strategy during 2010-2015 (n = 8). Patients received primary chemotherapy and pelvic CRT. Liver surgery was performed during the interval between CRT completion and rectal tumor re-evaluation. Clinical and oncological characteristics and long-term outcomes were assessed.All patients underwent liver metastatic resection with curative intent. The R0 rate was 100%. Six and two patients underwent local excision and a watch-and-wait (WW) approach, respectively. All patients had T3N1 tumors at diagnosis and had good clinical response after CRT. The median survival time was 60 (range, 14-127) mo. Three patients were disease free for 5, 8, and 10 years after the procedure. Five patients developed metastatic recurrence in the liver (n = 5) and/or lungs (n = 2). Only one patient developed local recurrence concurrent with metastatic recurrence 24 mo after the WW approach. Two patients died during follow-up. CONCLUSION The results suggest good local control in patients undergoing organ-sparing strategies for rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastasis. Prospective trials are required to validate these data and identify good candidates for these strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Meillat
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| | - Jonathan Garnier
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| | - Anais Palen
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| | - Jacques Ewald
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| | - Cécile de Chaisemartin
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| | - Marguerite Tyran
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| | - Emmanuel Mitry
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| | - Bernard Lelong
- Department of Digestive Surgical Oncology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille 13009, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Zhang S, Tang B, Yu M, He L, Zheng P, Yan C, Li J, Peng Q. Development and Validation of a Radiomics Model Based on Lymph-Node Regression Grading After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:821-833. [PMID: 37230433 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) varies among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), and the treatment response of lymph nodes (LNs) to nCRT is critical in implementing a watch-and-wait strategy. A robust predictive model may help personalize treatment plans to increase the chance that patients achieve a complete response. This study investigated whether radiomics features based on prenCRT magnetic resonance imaging nodes could predict treatment response in preoperative LARC LNs. METHODS AND MATERIALS The study included 78 patients with clinical stage T3-T4, N1-2, and M0 rectal adenocarcinoma who received long-course neoadjuvant radiotherapy before surgery. Pathologists evaluated 243 LNs, of which 173 and 70 were assigned to training and validation cohorts, respectively. For each LN, 3641 radiomics features were extracted from the region of interest in high-resolution T2WI magnetic resonance imaging before nCRT. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model was used for feature selection and radiomics signature building. A prediction model based on multivariate logistic analysis, combining radiomics signature and selected LN morphologic characteristics, was developed and visualized by drawing a nomogram. The model's performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and calibration curves. RESULTS The radiomics signature consists of 5 selected features that were effectively discriminated within the training cohort (area under the curve [AUC], 0.908; 95% CI, 0.857%-0.958%) and the validation cohort (AUC, 0.865; 95% CI, 0.757%-0.973%). The nomogram, which consisted of radiomics signature and LN morphologic characteristics (short-axis diameter and border contours), showed better calibration and discrimination in the training and validation cohorts (AUC, 0.925; 95% CI, 0.880%-0.969% and AUC, 0.918; 95% CI, 0.854%-0.983%, respectively). The decision curve analysis confirmed that the nomogram had the highest clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS The nodal-based radiomics model effectively predicts LNs treatment response in patients with LARC after nCRT, which could help personalize treatment plans and guide the implementation of the watch-and-wait approach in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SiYu Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Bin Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - MingRong Yu
- College of Physical Education, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, China
| | - Lei He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Ping Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - ChuanJun Yan
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| | - Qian Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jin DA, Gu FP, Meng TL, Zhang XX. Effect of low anterior resection syndrome on quality of life in colorectal cancer patients: A retrospective observational study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2123-2132. [PMID: 37969698 PMCID: PMC10642465 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is a common complication of anus-preserving surgery in patients with colorectal cancer, which significantly affects patients' quality of life. AIM To determine the relationship between the incidence of LARS and patient quality of life after colorectal cancer surgery and to establish a LARS prediction model to allow perioperative precision nursing. METHODS We reviewed the data from patients who underwent elective radical resection for colorectal cancer at our institution from April 2013 to June 2020 and completed the LARS score questionnaire and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life and Colorectal Cancer Module questionnaires. According to the LARS score results, the patients were divided into no LARS, mild LARS, and severe LARS groups. The incidence of LARS and the effects of this condition on patient quality of life were determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors for the occurrence of LARS. Based on these factors, we established a risk prediction model for LARS and evaluated its performance. RESULTS Among the 223 patients included, 51 did not develop LARS and 171 had mild or severe LARS. The following quality of life indicators showed significant differences between patients without LARS and those with mild or severe LARS: Physical, role, emotional, and cognitive function, total health status, fatigue, pain, shortness of breath, insomnia, constipation, and diarrhea. Tumor size, partial/total mesorectal excision, colostomy, preoperative radiotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were identified to be independent risk factors for LARS. A LARS prediction model was successfully established, which demonstrated an accuracy of 0.808 for predicting the occurrence of LARS. CONCLUSION The quality of life of patients with LARS after colorectal cancer surgery is significantly reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Ai Jin
- Department of Nursing, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Fang-Ping Gu
- Department of Nursing, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Tao-Li Meng
- Department of Nursing, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310016, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xuan-Xuan Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu 322000, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Quezada-Diaz FF, Smith JJ. Is Nonoperative Management of Rectal Cancer Feasible? Adv Surg 2023; 57:141-154. [PMID: 37536849 PMCID: PMC10926904 DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2023.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
During the past decade, the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has become more complex. Total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) has increased the rates of both clinical and pathologic complete response, resulting in improved long-term oncological outcomes. The feasibility to implement nonoperative management (NOM) depends on solving current challenges such as how to correctly identify the best candidates for a NOM without compromising oncologic safety. NOM should be part of the treatment discussion of LARC, considering increasing rates of clinical complete response, potential quality of life gains, avoidance of surgical morbidity, and patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe F Quezada-Diaz
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Complejo Asistencial Doctor Sótero del Río, Santiago, Región Metropolitana, Chile. https://twitter.com/ffquezad
| | - Jesse Joshua Smith
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue | SR-201, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Isaic A, Motofelea AC, Costachescu D, Pop GN, Totolici B, Popovici D, Diaconescu RG. What Is the Comparative Efficacy of Surgical, Endoscopic, Transanal Resection, and Radiotherapy Modalities in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer? Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2347. [PMID: 37628544 PMCID: PMC10454130 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11162347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer is a significant healthcare burden, and effective treatment is crucial. This research aims to compare the effectiveness of surgical and endoscopic resection, transanal resection, and radiotherapy. METHODS A literature analysis was conducted in order to identify relevant studies, by comparing the different surgical approaches and variables affecting treatment decisions. The findings were analyzed and synthesized to provide a comprehensive overview. RESULTS Surgical treatment, particularly TME (total mesorectal excision), proved consistent efficacy in achieving complete tumor resection and improving long-term survival. Endoscopic treatment and transanal resection techniques were promising for early-stage tumors but were associated with higher local recurrence rates. Radiotherapy, especially in combination with chemotherapy, played a crucial role in locally advanced cases, improving local control and reducing recurrence risk. Patient data, tumor characteristics, and healthcare system factors were identified as important factors in treatment modality selection. CONCLUSION Surgical treatment, specifically TME, remains the recommended standard approach for rectal cancer, providing excellent oncological outcomes. Endoscopic treatment and transanal resection techniques can be considered for selected early-stage cases, while radiotherapy is beneficial for locally advanced tumors. Treatment decisions should be personalized based on patient and tumor characteristics, considering the available resources and expertise within the healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandru Isaic
- IInd Surgery Clinic, Timisoara Emergency County Hospital, 300723 Timisoara, Romania;
- Department X of General Surgery, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Alexandru Cătălin Motofelea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
| | - Dan Costachescu
- Department of Orthopedics-Traumatology, Urology, Radiology, and Medical Imaging, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
- Department of Oncology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Gheorghe Nicusor Pop
- Center for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Bogdan Totolici
- 1st Clinic of General Surgery, Arad County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 310158 Arad, Romania;
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babes” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
| | - Dorel Popovici
- Department of Oncology, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Razvan Gheorghe Diaconescu
- OncoHelp Hospital, 300239 Timisoara, Romania;
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babes” Western University of Arad, 310025 Arad, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Peng W, Wan L, Wang S, Zou S, Zhao X, Zhang H. A multiple-time-scale comparative study for the added value of magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics in predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1234619. [PMID: 37664046 PMCID: PMC10468971 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1234619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Radiomics based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows potential for prediction of therapeutic effect to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC); however, thorough comparison between radiomics and traditional models is deficient. We aimed to construct multiple-time-scale (pretreatment, posttreatment, and combined) radiomic models to predict pathological complete response (pCR) and compare their utility to those of traditional clinical models. Methods In this research, 165 LARC patients undergoing nCRT followed by surgery were enrolled retrospectively, which were divided into training and testing sets in the ratio of 7:3. Morphological features on pre- and posttreatment MRI, coupled with clinical data, were evaluated by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis for constructing clinical models. Radiomic parameters were derived from pre- and posttreatment T2- and diffusion-weighted images to develop the radiomic signatures. The clinical-radiomics models were then generated. All the models were developed in the training set and then tested in the testing set, the performance of which was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Radiomic models were compared with the clinical models with the DeLong test. Results One hundred and sixty-five patients (median age, 55 years; age interquartile range, 47-62 years; 116 males) were enrolled in the study. The pretreatment maximum tumor length, posttreatment maximum tumor length, and magnetic resonance tumor regression grade were selected as independent predictors for pCR in the clinical models. In the testing set, the pre- and posttreatment and combined clinical models generated AUCs of 0.625, 0.842, and 0.842 for predicting pCR, respectively. The MRI-based radiomic models performed reasonably well in predicting pCR, but neither the pure radiomic signatures (AUCs, 0.734, 0.817, and 0.801 for the pre- and posttreatment and combined radiomic signatures, respectively) nor the clinical-radiomics models (AUCs, 0.734, 0.860, and 0.801 for the pre- and posttreatment and combined clinical-radiomics models, respectively) showed significant added value compared with the clinical models (all P > 0.05). Conclusion The MRI-based radiomic models exhibited no definite added value compared with the clinical models for predicting pCR in LARC. Radiomic models can serve as ancillary tools for tailoring adequate treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjing Peng
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lijuan Wan
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Sicong Wang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Diagnosis, GE Healthcare, Life Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Shuangmei Zou
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xinming Zhao
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongmei Zhang
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tanaka MD, Geubels BM, Grotenhuis BA, Marijnen CAM, Peters FP, van der Mierden S, Maas M, Couwenberg AM. Validated Pretreatment Prediction Models for Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3945. [PMID: 37568760 PMCID: PMC10417363 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Pretreatment response prediction is crucial to select those patients with rectal cancer who will benefit from organ preservation strategies following (intensified) neoadjuvant therapy and to avoid unnecessary toxicity in those who will not. The combination of individual predictors in multivariable prediction models might improve predictive accuracy. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and critically appraise validated pretreatment prediction models (other than radiomics-based models or image-based deep learning models) for response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with rectal cancer and provide evidence-based recommendations for future research. MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase.com, and Scopus were searched for eligible studies published up to November 2022. A total of 5006 studies were screened and 16 were included for data extraction and risk of bias assessment using Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). All selected models were unique and grouped into five predictor categories: clinical, combined, genetics, metabolites, and pathology. Studies generally included patients with intermediate or advanced tumor stages who were treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Evaluated outcomes were pathological complete response and pathological tumor response. All studies were considered to have a high risk of bias and none of the models were externally validated in an independent study. Discriminative performances, estimated with the area under the curve (AUC), ranged per predictor category from 0.60 to 0.70 (clinical), 0.78 to 0.81 (combined), 0.66 to 0.91 (genetics), 0.54 to 0.80 (metabolites), and 0.71 to 0.91 (pathology). Model calibration outcomes were reported in five studies. Two collagen feature-based models showed the best predictive performance (AUCs 0.83-0.91 and good calibration). In conclusion, some pretreatment models for response prediction in rectal cancer show encouraging predictive potential but, given the high risk of bias in these studies, their value should be evaluated in future, well-designed studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max D. Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Barbara M. Geubels
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, 5602 ZA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Brechtje A. Grotenhuis
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie A. M. Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Femke P. Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stevie van der Mierden
- Scientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Alice M. Couwenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Verweij ME, Tanaka MD, Kensen CM, van der Heide UA, Marijnen CAM, Janssen T, Vijlbrief T, van Grevenstein WMU, Moons LMG, Koopman M, Lacle MM, Braat MNGJA, Chalabi M, Maas M, Huibregtse IL, Snaebjornsson P, Grotenhuis BA, Fijneman R, Consten E, Pronk A, Smits AB, Heikens JT, Eijkelenkamp H, Elias SG, Verkooijen HM, Schoenmakers MMC, Meijer GJ, Intven M, Peters FP. Towards Response ADAptive Radiotherapy for organ preservation for intermediate-risk rectal cancer (preRADAR): protocol of a phase I dose-escalation trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e065010. [PMID: 37321815 PMCID: PMC10277084 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Organ preservation is associated with superior functional outcome and quality of life (QoL) compared with total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Only 10% of patients are eligible for organ preservation following short-course radiotherapy (SCRT, 25 Gy in five fractions) and a prolonged interval (4-8 weeks) to response evaluation. The organ preservation rate could potentially be increased by dose-escalated radiotherapy. Online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is anticipated to reduce radiation-induced toxicity and enable radiotherapy dose escalation. This trial aims to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of dose-escalated SCRT using online adaptive MRgRT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The preRADAR is a multicentre phase I trial with a 6+3 dose-escalation design. Patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer (cT3c-d(MRF-)N1M0 or cT1-3(MRF-)N1M0) interested in organ preservation are eligible. Patients are treated with a radiotherapy boost of 2×5 Gy (level 0), 3×5 Gy (level 1), 4×5 Gy (level 2) or 5×5 Gy (level 3) on the gross tumour volume in the week following standard SCRT using online adaptive MRgRT. The trial starts on dose level 1. The primary endpoint is the MTD based on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) per dose level. DLT is a composite of maximum one in nine severe radiation-induced toxicities and maximum one in three severe postoperative complications, in patients treated with TME or local excision within 26 weeks following start of treatment. Secondary endpoints include the organ preservation rate, non-DLT, oncological outcomes, patient-reported QoL and functional outcomes up to 2 years following start of treatment. Imaging and laboratory biomarkers are explored for early response prediction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial protocol has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. The primary and secondary trial results will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER WHO International Clinical Trials Registry (NL8997; https://trialsearch.who.int).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike E Verweij
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Max D Tanaka
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chavelli M Kensen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Corrie A M Marijnen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tomas Janssen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tineke Vijlbrief
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leon M G Moons
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Miangela M Lacle
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Manon N G J A Braat
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Myriam Chalabi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge L Huibregtse
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Petur Snaebjornsson
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Remond Fijneman
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Apollo Pronk
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht Zeist Doorn, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anke B Smits
- Department of Surgery, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Joost T Heikens
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Rivierenland, Tiel, The Netherlands
| | - Hidde Eijkelenkamp
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd G Elias
- Department of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gert J Meijer
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Intven
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Femke P Peters
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Verweij ME, Franzen J, van Grevenstein WMU, Verkooijen HM, Intven MPW. Timing of rectal cancer surgery after short-course radiotherapy: national database study. Br J Surg 2023; 110:839-845. [PMID: 37172197 PMCID: PMC10364516 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous randomized trials found that a prolonged interval between short-course radiotherapy (SCRT, 25 Gy in 5 fractions) and surgery for rectal cancer (4-8 weeks, SCRT-delay) results in a lower postoperative complication rate and a higher pCR rate than SCRT and surgery within a week (SCRT-direct surgery). This study sought to confirm these results in a Dutch national database. METHODS Patients with intermediate-risk rectal cancer (T3(mesorectal fascia (MRF)-) N0 M0 and T1-3(MRF-) N1 M0) treated with either SCRT-delay (4-12 weeks) or SCRT-direct surgery in 2018-2021 were selected from a Dutch national colorectal cancer database. Confounders were adjusted for using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). The primary endpoint was the 90-day postoperative complication rate. Secondary endpoints included the pCR rate. Endpoints were compared using log-binomial and Poisson regression. RESULTS Some 664 patients were included in the SCRT-direct surgery and 238 in the SCRT-delay group. After IPTW, the 90-day postoperative complication rate was comparable after SCRT-direct surgery and SCRT-delay (40.1 versus 42.3 per cent; risk ratio (RR) 1.1, 95 per cent c.i. 0.9 to 1.3). A pCR occurred more often after SCRT-delay than SCRT-direct surgery (10.7 versus 0.4 per cent; RR 39, 11 to 139). CONCLUSION There was no difference in surgical complication rates between SCRT-delay and SCRT-direct, but SCRT-delay was associated with more patients having a pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike E Verweij
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jolien Franzen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Helena M Verkooijen
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn P W Intven
- Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rooney MK, De B, Corrigan K, Smith GL, Taniguchi C, Minsky BD, Ludmir EB, Koay EJ, Das P, Koong AC, Peacock O, Chang G, You YN, Morris VK, Nogueras-González G, Holliday EB. Patient-reported Bowel Function and Bowel-related Quality of Life After Pelvic Radiation for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: The Impact of Radiation Fractionation and Surgical Resection. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2023; 22:211-221. [PMID: 36878805 PMCID: PMC10213111 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2023.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multimodality treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) can include long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) or short course radiotherapy (SCRT). Nonoperative management is increasingly pursued for those achieving a complete clinical response. Data regarding long-term function and quality-of-life (QOL) are limited. METHODS Patients with LARC treated with radiotherapy from 2016 to 2020 completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- General (FACT-G7), the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS) and the Fecal Incontinence QOL Scale (FIQOL). Univariate and multivariable linear regression analyses identified associations between clinical variables including radiation fractionation and the use of surgery versus non-operative management. RESULTS Of 204 patients surveyed, 124 (60.8%) responded. Median (interquartile range) time from radiation to survey completion was 30.1 (18.3-43) months. Seventy-nine (63.7%) respondents received LCRT, and 45 (36.3%) received SCRT; 101 (81.5%) respondents underwent surgery, and 23 (18.5%) pursued nonoperative management. There were no differences in LARS, FIQoL or FACT-G7 between patients receiving LCRT versus SCRT. On multivariable analysis, only nonoperative management was associated with lower LARS score signifying less bowel dysfunction. Nonoperative management and female sex were associated with a higher FIQoL score signifying less disruption and distress from fecal incontinence issues. Finally, lower BMI at the time of radiation, female sex, and higher FIQoL score were associated with higher FACT-G7 scores signifying better overall QOL. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest long-term patient-reported bowel function and QOL may be similar for individuals receiving SCRT and LCRT for the treatment of LARC, but nonoperative management may lead to improved bowel function and QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Rooney
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brian De
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kelsey Corrigan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Cullen Taniguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Oliver Peacock
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - George Chang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Couwenberg AM, Varvoglis DN, Grieb BC, Marijnen CA, Ciombor KK, Guillem JG. New Opportunities for Minimizing Toxicity in Rectal Cancer Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e389558. [PMID: 37307515 PMCID: PMC10450577 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_389558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Advances in multimodal management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), consisting of preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, have improved local disease control and patient survival but are associated with significant risk for acute and long-term morbidity. Recently published trials, evaluating treatment dose intensification via the addition of preoperative induction or consolidation chemotherapy (total neoadjuvant therapy [TNT]), have demonstrated improved tumor response rates while maintaining acceptable toxicity. In addition, TNT has led to an increased number of patients achieving a clinical complete response and thus eligible to pursue a nonoperative, organ-preserving, watch and wait approach, thereby avoiding toxicities associated with surgery, such as bowel dysfunction and stoma-related complications. Ongoing trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with mismatch repair-deficient tumors suggest that this subgroup of patients with LARC could potentially be treated with immunotherapy alone, sparing them the toxicity associated with preoperative treatment and surgery. However, the majority of rectal cancers are mismatch repair-proficient and less responsive to immune checkpoint inhibitors and require multimodal management. The synergy noted in preclinical studies between immunotherapy and radiotherapy on immunogenic tumor cell death has led to the design of ongoing clinical trials that explore the benefit of combining radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy (mainly of immune checkpoint inhibitors) and aim to increase the number of patients eligible for organ preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice M. Couwenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Brian C. Grieb
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Corrie A.M. Marijnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Kristen K. Ciombor
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center/Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Jose G. Guillem
- Department of Surgery, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wurschi GW, Knippen S, Ernst T, Schneider C, Helfritzsch H, Mothes H, Liebe Y, Huber M, Wittig A. Long-Term Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Leads to Impressive Response Rates in Rectal Cancer: Results of a German Single-Center Cohort. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:5366-5378. [PMID: 37366890 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30060407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Intensified preoperative chemotherapy after (chemo)radiotherapy, (Total Neoadjuvant Therapy-TNT), increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates and local control. In cases of clinically complete response (cCR) and close follow-up, non-operative management (NOM) is feasible. We report early outcomes and toxicities of a long-term TNT regime in a single-center cohort. Fifteen consecutive patients with distal or middle-third locally advanced rectal cancer (UICC stage II-III) were investigated, who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (total adsorbed dose: 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and two concomitant courses 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/m2/d)/oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2), followed by consolidating chemotherapy (nine courses of FOLFOX4). NOM was offered if staging revealed cCR 2 months after TNT, with resection performed otherwise. The primary endpoint was complete response (pCR + cCR). Treatment-related side effects were quantified for up two years after TNT. Ten patients achieved cCR, of whom five opted for NOM. Ten patients (five cCR and five non-cCR) underwent surgery, with pCR confirmed in the five patients with cCR. The main toxicities comprised leukocytopenia (13/15), fatigue (12/15) and polyneuropathy (11/15). The most relevant CTC °III + IV events were leukocytopenia (4/15), neutropenia (2/15) and diarrhea (1/15). The long-term TNT regime resulted in promising response rates that are higher than the response rates of short TNT regimes. Overall tolerability and toxicity were comparable with the results of prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg W Wurschi
- Clinician Scientist Program, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Stefan Knippen
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Thomas Ernst
- University Tumor Center (UTC), Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Claus Schneider
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Herry Helfritzsch
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Thuringia-Clinic Saalfeld Georgius Agricola, 07318 Saalfeld, Germany
| | - Henning Mothes
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Sophien-und Hufeland-Klinikum Weimar, 99425 Weimar, Germany
| | - Yves Liebe
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, SRH Wald-Klinikum Gera, 07548 Gera, Germany
| | - Martin Huber
- Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Robert-Koch-Hospital, 99510 Apolda, Germany
| | - Andrea Wittig
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Custers PA, van der Sande ME, Grotenhuis BA, Peters FP, van Kuijk SMJ, Beets GL, Breukink SO. Long-term Quality of Life and Functional Outcome of Patients With Rectal Cancer Following a Watch-and-Wait Approach. JAMA Surg 2023; 158:e230146. [PMID: 36988922 PMCID: PMC10061319 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Importance A watch-and-wait approach for patients with rectal cancer and a clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy is associated with better quality of life and functional outcome. Nevertheless, prospective data on both parameters are scarce. Objective To prospectively evaluate quality of life and functional outcome, including bowel, urinary, and sexual function, of patients following a watch-and-wait approach. Design, Setting, and Participants A total of 278 patients with rectal cancer and a clinical complete response or near-complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy were included in 2 prospective cohort studies: a single-center study (March 2014 to October 2017) and an ongoing multicenter study (from September 2017). Patients were observed by a watch-and-wait approach. Additional local excision or total mesorectal excision was performed for residual disease or regrowth. Data were analyzed between April 1, 2021, and August 27, 2021, for patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Main Outcomes and Measures Quality of life was evaluated with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30), EORTC-QLQ-CR38, or EORTC-QLQ-CR29 and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. The score for the questionnaires and 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey ranges from 0 to 100. For some scales, a high score indicates a high level of functioning, and for others it indicates a high level of complaints and symptomatology. Functional outcome was assessed by the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome score, Vaizey incontinence score, International Prostate Symptom Score, International Index of Erectile Function, and Female Sexual Function Index. Results Of 278 patients included, 187 were male (67%), and the median age was 66 years (range, 34-85 years). In the first 24 months, 221 patients (80%) were observed by a watch-and-wait approach without requiring surgery, 18 patients (6%) underwent additional local excision, and 39 patients (14%) underwent total mesorectal excision. In general, patients observed by a watch-and-wait approach reported good quality of life, with limited variation over time. At 3 months, 56 of 221 patients (25.3%) reported major bowel dysfunction; at 12 months, 53 patients (24.0%) reported it; and at 24 months, 55 patients (24.9%) reported it. At 24 months, 48 of 151 male patients (31.8%) reported severe erectile dysfunction. For female patients, sexual satisfaction and overall sexual function decreased during follow-up. Patients who underwent local excision reported more major bowel dysfunction (10 of 18 patients [55.6%]) compared with those without additional surgery. Quality-of-life scores, however, were comparable. After total mesorectal excision, patients scored significantly worse on several quality-of-life subscales. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study suggest that patients with rectal cancer who were observed by a watch-and-wait approach had good quality of life, with some patients reporting bowel and sexual dysfunction. Quality of life and functional outcome deteriorated when patients required surgery. These data will be useful in daily care to counsel patients on what to expect from a watch-and-wait approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra A. Custers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marit E. van der Sande
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Brechtje A. Grotenhuis
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Femke P. Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sander M. J. van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Geerard L. Beets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Stéphanie O. Breukink
- GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Cerdan-Santacruz C, São Julião GP, Vailati BB, Corbi L, Habr-Gama A, Perez RO. Watch and Wait Approach for Rectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12082873. [PMID: 37109210 PMCID: PMC10143332 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The administration of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorrectal excision (TME) and selective use of adjuvant chemotherapy can still be considered the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, avoiding sequelae of TME and entering a narrow follow-up program of watch and wait (W&W), in select cases that achieve a comparable clinical complete response (cCR) to nCRT, is now very attractive to both patients and clinicians. Many advances based on well-designed studies and long-term data coming from big multicenter cohorts have drawn some important conclusions and warnings regarding this strategy. In order to safely implement W&W, it is important consider proper selection of cases, best treatment options, surveillance strategy and the attitudes towards near complete responses or even tumor regrowth. The present review offers a comprehensive overview of W&W strategy from its origins to the most current literature, from a practical point of view focused on daily clinical practice, without losing sight of the most important future prospects in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Cerdan-Santacruz
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain
- Department of Coloproctology, Clínica Santa Elena, 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - Guilherme Pagin São Julião
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Bruna Borba Vailati
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Corbi
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Angelita Habr-Gama
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo Oliva Perez
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo 01329-020, Brazil
- Department of Coloproctology, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo 01323-020, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo 01323-001, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Chuong MD, Anker CJ, Buckstein MH, Hawkins MA, Kharofa J, Raldow AC, Sanford NN, Wojcieszysnki A, Olsen JR. Hits and Misses in Novel Pancreatic and Rectal Cancer Treatment Options. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:545-552. [PMID: 36725162 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Michael H Buckstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | | | - Jordan Kharofa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Ann C Raldow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Nina N Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Jeffrey R Olsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Grotenhuis BA, Beets GL. Watch-and-Wait is an Option in Rectal Cancer Patients: From Controversy to Common Clinical Practice. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:124-129. [PMID: 36481218 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Overview of the introduction of organ preservation in rectal cancer patients and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A Grotenhuis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G L Beets
- GROW - School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bibi S, Edilbe MW, Rao C. The Cost-effectiveness of Watch and Wait for Rectal Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:132-137. [PMID: 36266161 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
The existing literature suggests with a high degree of certainty that watch and wait is more cost-effective than initial total mesorectal excision. However, it is heavily reliant on poor-quality health-related quality of life data. Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness of organ preservation from a broader societal perspective has not been studied. Finally, the cost-effectiveness of emerging adjuncts to watch and wait for organ preservation, such as contact X-ray brachytherapy, local excision and total neoadjuvant therapy, need to be characterised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bibi
- The Department of Colorectal Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK
| | - M W Edilbe
- The Department of Colorectal Surgery, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK; The Academic Surgical Unit, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK
| | - C Rao
- The Academic Surgical Unit, North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust, Carlisle, UK; The Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Stijns RCH, Leijtens J, de Graaf E, Bach SP, Beets G, Bremers AJA, Beets-Tan RGH, de Wilt JHW. Endoscopy and MRI for restaging early rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:211-221. [PMID: 36104011 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has great potential to downstage rectal cancer. Response assessment has been investigated in locally advanced rectal cancer but not in early stage rectal cancer. The aim is to characterize the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy performed by surgical endoscopists compared to (diffusion-weighted, DWI) MRI only and a multimodal approach combining (DWI-)MRI and endoscopic information both analysed by an abdominal radiologist for response assessment in early rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT for early distal rectal cancer (cT1-3 N0) followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery were included. Three separate reassessment groups were analysed for response assessment using endoscopic evaluation alone versus (DWI-)MRI alone versus the combination of endoscopy with (DWI-)MRI with a focus on sensitivity and specificity and analysis using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS Three cohorts (N = 36, N = 25 and N = 25, respectively) were analysed for response assessment. Of the endoscopy cohort, 16 of the 36 patients had a complete response. Area under the curve was 0.69 (0.66-0.74; pooled sensitivity 55.3%, pooled specificity 80.0%). Agreement for scoring separate endoscopic features was poor to moderate. Of the (DWI-)MRI cohort, 11 of the 25 patients had a complete response. Area under the curve for (DWI-)MRI alone was 0.55 (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 42.9%). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve improved to 0.68 (sensitivity 90.9%, specificity 75.0%) when (DWI-)MRI was combined with endoscopic information, with 11 out of 25 patients with a complete response. The most accurate response assessment was made by combining endoscopy and (DWI-)MRI with a high negative predictive value (90.9%). CONCLUSION Good and complete responders after chemoradiation of early stage rectal cancer can be best assessed using a multimodality approach combining endoscopy and (DWI-)MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rutger C H Stijns
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Leijtens
- Department of Surgery, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherlands
| | - Eelco de Graaf
- Department of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle aan de Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P Bach
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Geerard Beets
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andre J A Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- Department of Radiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Johannes H W de Wilt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
„Low anterior resection syndrome“ (LARS) in Zahlen. COLOPROCTOLOGY 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s00053-022-00674-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|