Sessile Serrated Polyposis: Not an Inherited Syndrome?

GI Polyps and Polyposis in Individuals Harboring Germline CHEK2 Mutations

BACKGROUND

Checkpoint kinase 2 is a tumor suppressor gene in the DNA damage checkpoint system that may be mutated in several cancers. Patients with germline checkpoint kinase 2 mutations and multiple colon polyps were noted during routine care, and genetic testing is recommended for patients with as few as 10 lifetime polyps.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed whether checkpoint kinase 2 is associated with attenuated or oligopolyposis and characterized the GI clinicopathologic profile.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTINGS

Records from patients harboring germline checkpoint kinase 2 mutations from 1999 to 2020 were reviewed.

PATIENTS

A total of 45 patients with germline checkpoint kinase 2 mutations with endoscopic examinations.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Description of clinicopathologic variables.

RESULTS

Twenty-five of 45 patients had polyps: 3 with only upper GI polyps, 17 with only lower GI polyps, and 5 with both upper and lower GI polyps. The most common germline checkpoint kinase 2 mutations in patients with polyps were p.S428F (n = 10), p.I157T (n = 4), and p.T476M (n = 2), with other mutations present in 1 patient each. Among patients with lower GI polyps, 9 had adenomas, 6 had serrated polyps, 1 had an inflammatory polyp, and 6 had both adenomatous and serrated polyps. Three patients (p.I157T, n = 2; p.R117G, n = 1) had more than 10 adenomas and 1 (p.G259fs) had 18 serrated polyps. Five patients (11.1%) developed colorectal adenocarcinoma, including 2 with more than 10 adenomas. Five patients with p.S428F (50%) exclusively had right-sided adenomas.

LIMITATIONS

Single-center descriptive study.

CONCLUSIONS

Germline checkpoint kinase 2 mutations should be considered in patients with polyposis. The preponderance of right-sided adenomas in patients with p.S428F mutations suggests the importance of right-sided colonoscopy in these patients. See Video Abstract .

PLIPOS Y POLIPOSIS GASTROINTESTINALES EN INDIVIDUOS QUE ALBERGAN MUTACIONES EN LA LNEA GERMINAL DEL GEN CHEK

ANTECEDENTES:El punto de control quinasa 2 (CHEK2) es un gen supresor de tumores en el sistema de puntos de control de daño del ácido desoxirribonucleico (ADN) que puede mutar en varios cánceres. Durante la atención de rutina se observaron pacientes con mutaciones de la línea germinal CHEK2 y múltiples pólipos en el colon, y se recomiendan pruebas genéticas para pacientes con al menos 10 pólipos en su vida.OBJETIVO:Este estudio evaluó si CHEK2 está asociado con poliposis atenuada u oligopoliposis y caracterizó el perfil clínico-patológico gastrointestinal (GI).DISEÑO:Estudio observacional retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Se revisaron los registros de pacientes que albergaban mutaciones de la línea germinal CHEK2 de 1999 a 2020.PACIENTES:45 pacientes con mutaciones de la línea germinal CHEK2 con exámenes endoscópicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Descripción de variables clínico-patológicas.RESULTADOS:25 de 45 pacientes tenían pólipos: 3 sólo con pólipos GI superiores, 17 sólo con pólipos GI inferiores y 5 con pólipos GI superiores e inferiores. Las mutaciones de la línea germinal CHEK2 más comunes en pacientes con pólipos fueron p.S428F (n = 10), p.I157T (n = 4) y p.T476M (n = 2), con otras mutaciones presentes en 1 paciente cada una. Entre los pacientes con pólipos gastrointestinales inferiores, 9 tenían adenomas, 6 tenían pólipos serrados, 1 tenía un pólipo inflamatorio y 6 tenían pólipos tanto adenomatosos como serrados. Tres pacientes (p.I157T, n=2; p.R117G, n = 1) tenían >10 adenomas y 1 (p.G259fs) tenía 18 pólipos serrados. Cinco pacientes (11,1%) desarrollaron adenocarcinoma colorrectal, incluidos 2 con >10 adenomas. Cinco pacientes con p.S428F (50%) tenían exclusivamente adenomas del lado derecho.LIMITACIONES:Estudio descriptivo unicéntrico.CONCLUSIONES:Las mutaciones de la línea germinal CHEK2 deben considerarse en pacientes con poliposis. La preponderancia de adenomas del lado derecho en pacientes con mutaciones p.S428F sugiere la importancia de la colonoscopia del lado derecho en estos pacientes. (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Serrated polyposis syndrome: defining the epidemiology and predicting the risk of dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Serrated polyposis syndrome is the most common polyposis syndrome that has neoplastic potential. However, the natural history, genetic basis, and risk of dysplasia and neoplasia of serrated polyposis syndrome are incompletely understood. The objective of this study is to define the epidemiology of serrated polyposis syndrome. Using this data, we aim to evaluate candidate variables for predicting the risk of dysplasia and neoplasia in sessile serrated lesions found in serrated polyposis syndrome patients. Finally, we aim to use this data to create and evaluate clinical prediction models for accuracy in predicting dysplastic sessile serrated lesions in serrated polyposis syndrome patients.

METHODS

This was a regional Australian single-centre retrospective cohort study. Data was prospectively collected data from the clinical record database of a regional Australian gastroenterology practice. All patients undergoing colonoscopy at Port Macquarie Gastroenterology between January 2015 and September 2021 were screened for this study. Collected data included patient demographic, endoscopic, and histopathological findings. Clinical and endoscopic multivariate logistic regression models were created to predict dysplastic sessile serrated lesions. Model performance was examined using the area under the receiver operating curve.

RESULTS

In total 8401 patients underwent a colonoscopy procedure during the study period. Serrated polyposis syndrome was diagnosed in 247, representing a prevalence of 2.94% (mean age 67.15 years, 62.75% female). Logistic regression identified; older age at serrated polyposis syndrome diagnosis, a personal history of colorectal cancer, size of the largest sessile serrated lesions removed, and total sessile serrated lesions count as predictors of dysplastic sessile serrated lesions. The clinical and endoscopic model had an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.75.

CONCLUSION

Serrated polyposis syndrome is more common than previously described. The clinical and endoscopic variables identified in logistic regression have acceptable accuracy in predicting the risk of dysplasia, however other populations need to be studied to achieve generalisability and improve model performance.

The Natural History of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes: From Phenotype to Genotype? Where Do We Stand and What Does the Future Hold?

Applying the concept of a "natural history" to hereditary colorectal cancer is an interesting exercise because the way the syndromes are approached has changed so drastically. However, the exercise is instructive as it forces us to think in depth about where we are, where we have been, and, most helpfully, about where we may be going. In this article the diagnosis, along with endoscopic and surgical management of hereditary colorectal cancer are discussed in the context of their history and the changes in genomics and technology that have occurred over the last one hundred years.

Clinical, Pathologic, and Molecular-Genetic Aspects of Colorectal Polyps

Most colorectal cancer arises from epithelial polyps. Polyps can be the result of acquired, germline, or inflammation-associated mutations in colonic stem cells (CSC). Their incidence and risk of progression are determined by factors that modify the baseline rate of spontaneous mutations occurring in CSC. In sporadic polyps, factors are primarily environmental; in individuals with germline mutations, it is the specific mutation, and in inflammation-associated polyps, it correlates with the extent, duration, and severity of the process. The different clinicopathologic and molecular genetic abnormalities underlying the different types of polyps are discussed.

Genotypic and Phenotypic Characteristics of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer

The genomic causes and clinical manifestations of hereditary colorectal cancer (HCRC) might be stratified into 2 groups, namely, familial (FCRC) and a limited sense of HCRC, respectively. Otherwise, FCRC is canonically classified into 2 major categories; Lynch syndrome (LS) or associated spectra and inherited polyposis syndrome. By contrast, despite an increasing body of genotypic and phenotypic traits, some FCRC cannot be clearly differentiated as definitively single type, and the situation has become more complex as additional causative genes have been discovered. This review provides an overview of HCRC, including 6 LS or associated spectra and 8 inherited polyposis syndromes, according to molecular pathogenesis. Variants and newly-identified FCRC are particularly emphasized, including MUTYH (or MYH)-associated polyposis, Muir-Torre syndrome, constitutional mismatch repair deficiency, EPCAM-associated LS, polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis, RNF43- or NTHL1-associated serrated polyposis syndrome, PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome, and hereditary mixed polyposis syndrome. We also comment on the clinical utility of multigene panel tests, focusing on comprehensive cancer panels that include HCRC. Finally, HCRC surveillance strategies are recommended, based on revised or notable concepts underpinned by competent validation and clinical implications, and favoring major guidelines. As hereditary syndromes are mainly attributable to genomic constitutions of distinctive ancestral groups, an integrative national HCRC registry and guideline is an urgent priority.

The Second Allele: A Key to Understanding the Timing of Sporadic and Hereditary Colorectal Tumorigenesis

Our understanding of the molecular basis of colorectal neoplasia is derived from Mendelian genetics, with tumor suppressor genes contributing more to the deregulation of growth than oncogenes. In patients with hereditary syndromes, expression of one allele of a key tumor suppressor gene is absent at birth. The loss of the expression of the second allele precipitates tumorigenesis. However, there are multiple ways in which the expression of the second allele of a tumor suppressor gene is lost. Here, we review these ways and their possible effect on phenotype.