Aluminum-Allergen of the Year 2022

Overcoming False-Negative Patch Tests: A Systematic Literature Review

Exogenous allergens, found in cosmetic products, jewelry items, antiseptics and antibacterials, plants, and solvents, can cause clinical allergic contact Dermatitis (ACD). To help identify and discern which allergen is causing ACD, clinicians use patch tests, but they can yield false-negative results at times. Examining potential reasoning for false negatives is particularly helpful when a patient's history and physical examination strongly suggest ACD, and the patch test is negative. A strong history and physical presentation suggestive of ACD warrants additional patch testing or other methods to verify a false-negative patch test result. We conducted a literature review to compile various reasonings and solutions for false-negative patch tests in suspected ACD patients. Utilizing EMBASE, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholars, 49 articles were included by using search terms such as "False negative patch test" or "False-negative patch test" and "allergic contact Dermatitis," or "ACD." Common factors that led to false-negative patch test results include low allergen concentration, inadequate percutaneous penetration, technique error, immunosuppressive therapy, and ultraviolet exposure. Potential solutions include using different vehicles, concentration, increasing reading time, repeating the patch test, intradermal testing, and repeat open application testing. If a false-negative patch test is suspected, then intradermal testing can be administered to ensure the specificity of the patch test result. Considering the main contributing factors and solutions to false-negative patch tests, clinicians can accurately diagnose ACD and administer proper treatment plans.

Long-term effects of pollen allergoid tyrosine-adsorbed subcutaneous immunotherapy on allergic rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) may have a long-term disease-modifying effect. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the long-term effects of pollen allergoid tyrosine-adsorbed subcutaneous AIT on allergic rhinitis (AR) and asthma (AA) in clinical practice.

METHODS

This retrospective study, funded by an AIT manufacturer, analysed the impact of AIT on AR progression and onset of need for AA medication, using a German database covering ~35% of national prescriptions during 2008-2020. Anonymized prescription data of AR patients aged 5-65 years treated with grass or tree pollen AIT between 2009 and 2013 and followed for at least 2 years after AIT cessation were compared with matched control patients with seasonal AR.

RESULTS

181,496 patients received AIT prescriptions. 5959 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median AIT treatment duration was 1092 days and the follow-up duration was 6.4 years. Less patients treated with AIT received prescriptions for symptomatic AR medication in the follow-up versus controls (AIT: OR: 0.37; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.34, 0.40; p < .001, tyrosine-adsorbed AIT: OR: 0.27; 95% CI 0.20, 0.35 p < .001). Less asthmatic patients under AIT received prescriptions for AA medications versus controls (AIT: OR: 0.48; 95% CI 0.41, 0.55; p < .001, tyrosine-adsorbed AIT: OR: 0.48; 95% CI 0.29, 0.79; p = .004). AR and AA medication prescriptions for AIT patients were reduced in the follow-up versus baseline and controls (AIT: AR: 20.0%; 1.5 vs. 0.2 prescriptions; AA: 29.1%; 2.0 vs. 0.6 prescriptions, p < .001; tyrosine-adsorbed AIT: AR: 24.2%, 1.4 vs. 0.2 prescriptions; AA: 35.6%, 2.1 vs. 0.6 prescriptions, p < .001). The probability of AA medication onset in non-asthmatic patients during follow-up was reduced for AIT patients compared to controls (OR: 0.77, 95% CI 0.66, 0.90; p = .001). All endpoints were significant for children/adolescents and adults in stratified analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

We found evidence for long-term effects up to 9.5 years for tyrosine-adsorbed AIT.

Metal Allergy: State-of-the-Art Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Hypersensitivity to Implants

Metal allergy is mainly an environmental disorder which can cause allergic contact dermatitis. Environmental metal exposures include jewelry, everyday metal items, mobile phones, leather, metal-rich food and implants, including stents or anchors. While consumer exposure is liable for the majority of metal hypersensitivity cases, the significance of occupational exposure to metals remains relevant. Although the most common metal allergens are nickel, chromium, and cobalt; however, lately, gold, palladium, titanium, and some others have also attracted attention. This review highlights advances in metal allergy mechanisms, biomarkers for potential patients' stratification as well as biological treatments. The most recent evidence of human exposure to metal for risk assessment is discussed, as well as the relationship between the occurrence of metal hypersensitivity and implanted devices, including non-characteristic symptoms. The latest data on the diagnosis of metal hypersensitivity are also reported.

Risk factors for granulomas in children following immunisation with aluminium adsorbed vaccines: A Danish population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Aluminium adsorbed vaccines may in some children cause severely itching nodules at the injection site, known as vaccination granulomas.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate vaccine-, child- and maternal level risk factors for the development of vaccination granulomas following immunisation with aluminium adsorbed vaccines.

METHODS

A Danish population-based cohort study with 553 932 children born in Denmark from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018, vaccinated with an aluminium adsorbed vaccine during the first year of life, followed until 31 December 2020. Poisson regression was used to estimate granuloma rate ratios according to type of adjuvant, accumulated dose of aluminium, timing of vaccination appointments, sex, gestational age, having siblings with granulomas, maternal age, and maternal ethnicity.

RESULTS

We identified 1 901 vaccination granuloma cases (absolute risk, 0.34%). Among vaccine level factors, revaccination (third vs first vaccination appointment, adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.55), the specific adjuvant used (aluminium phosphate vs hydroxide, RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70) and dosage (≥1.0 mg vs <1.0 mg, RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.19-1.52) were associated with risk of granulomas; the timing of vaccination appointments was not. Among child level factors, female sex (vs males, RR 1.12, 95% CI, 1.02-1.22), prematurity (vs term birth, RR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.54-0.93) and having sibling(s) with granulomas (vs no siblings with granulomas, RR 46.15, 95% CI, 33.67-63.26) were associated with risk of granulomas. Among maternal level factors, non-Danish ethnicity (vs. Danish, RR 0.51, 95% CI, 0.42-0.63) and young maternal age (<20 yrs. vs 20-39 yrs., RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.83) were associated with risk of granulomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Several risk factors for vaccination granulomas at both the vaccine, child, and maternal level, was identified. Reducing the dose of aluminium or replacing aluminium hydroxide with aluminium phosphate could reduce the risk of granulomas. However, this must be balanced against the potential for reduced immunogenicity.