1
|
Limcharoen B, Wanichwecharungruang S, Kröger M, Sansureerungsikul T, Schleusener J, Lena Klein A, Banlunara W, Meinke MC, Darvin ME. Dissolvable microneedles in the skin: Determination the impact of barrier disruption and dry skin on dissolution. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2024; 199:114303. [PMID: 38657740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Dissolvable microneedles (DMNs), fabricated from biocompatible materials that dissolve in both water and skin have gained popularity in dermatology. However, limited research exists on their application in compromised skin conditions. This study compares the hyaluronic acid-based DMNs penetration, formation of microchannels, dissolution, and diffusion kinetics in intact, barrier-disrupted (tape stripped), and dry (acetone-treated) porcine ear skin ex vivo. After DMNs application, comprehensive investigations including dermoscopy, stereomicroscope, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), optical coherence tomography (OCT), reflectance confocal laser scanning microscopy (RCLSM), confocal Raman micro-spectroscopy (CRM), two-photon tomography combined with fluorescence lifetime imaging (TPT-FLIM), histology, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were conducted. The 400 µm long DMNs successfully penetrated the skin to depths of ≈200 µm for dry skin and ≈200-290 µm for barrier-disrupted skin. Although DMNs fully inserted into all skin conditions, their dissolution rates were high in barrier-disrupted and low in dry skin, as observed through stereomicroscopy and TPT-FLIM. The dissolved polymer exhibited a more significant expansion in barrier-disrupted skin compared to intact skin, with the smallest increase observed in dry skin. Elevated TEWL and reduced skin hydration levels were evident in barrier-disrupted and dry skins compared to intact skin. OCT and RCLSM revealed noticeable skin indentation and pronounced microchannel areas, particularly in barrier-disrupted and dry skin. Additional confirmation of DMN effects on the skin and substance dissolution was obtained through histology, SEM, and CRM techniques. This study highlights the impact of skin condition on DMN effectiveness, emphasizing the importance of considering dissolvability and dissolution rates of needle materials, primarily composed of hyaluronic acid, for optimizing DMN-based drug delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benchaphorn Limcharoen
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Advanced Materials and Biointerfaces, Chulalongkorn University, 10330, Thailand
| | - Supason Wanichwecharungruang
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Advanced Materials and Biointerfaces, Chulalongkorn University, 10330, Thailand
| | - Marius Kröger
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology (CCP), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Titiporn Sansureerungsikul
- Mineed Technology, 928 Block 28, Building D, Chulalongkorn 7 Alley, Wangmai, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Johannes Schleusener
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology (CCP), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Anna Lena Klein
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology (CCP), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Germany
| | - Wijit Banlunara
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand; Center of Excellence in Advanced Materials and Biointerfaces, Chulalongkorn University, 10330, Thailand
| | - Martina C Meinke
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology (CCP), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Germany.
| | - Maxim E Darvin
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Center of Experimental and Applied Cutaneous Physiology (CCP), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10117, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ugwu N, Xun H, Dover JS, Boustany AN, Chung HJ. Histological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Microneedling Device-Assisted Filler Delivery. Dermatol Surg 2024:00042728-990000000-00781. [PMID: 38691514 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000004206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microneedling is used to enhance transcutaneous drug delivery. However, the extent to which microneedling devices impact filler delivery and whether this varies by filler type, microneedling device type, and treatment sequence is not known. OBJECTIVE To histologically assess and quantify the delivery of commonly used fillers through microneedling, using both a microneedling pen and a microneedling roller. In addition, the authors investigated whether there is a variation in filler delivery based on the sequence of microneedling in relation to topical filler application. METHODS Ex vivo human abdominal skin samples were subjected to microneedling pen or microneedling roller treatment. Black tissue marking ink, hyaluronic acid, poly-l-lactic acid, or undiluted calcium hydroxyapatite was topically applied before or immediately after microneedling treatment. RESULTS Histological evaluation revealed a notable presence of black ink within channels formed by both microneedling treatments (15.5%-98.1%), whereas there was limited presence of the various filler types tested (0%-6.6%) in all settings. Topical application before microneedling treatment led to relatively higher filler/ink deposition within the channels formed by the microneedling treatments compared with topical application after microneedling. CONCLUSION Transcutaneous delivery of fillers was not significantly helped by microneedling treatment, whereas the microneedling devices demonstrated effective delivery of an aqueous solution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nelson Ugwu
- Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen Xun
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Ashley N Boustany
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hye Jin Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cervantes J, Chang YF, Dover JS, Hernandez Alvarez A, Chung HJ. Laser-Assisted and Device-Assisted Filler Delivery: A Histologic Evaluation. Dermatol Surg 2023; 49:865-870. [PMID: 37389474 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lasers and devices are used to enhance transcutaneous delivery of fillers. However, little has been published on the histologic findings of this form of laser/device-assisted delivery to determine the optimal devices and fillers. OBJECTIVE To objectively evaluate the histological effects of laser-assisted and device-assisted filler delivery. METHODS Ex vivo human abdominoplasty skin samples were treated with fractional CO 2 laser (ECO 2 , 120 μm tip, 120 mJ), fractional radiofrequency microneedling (FRMN, Genius, 1.5 mm, 20 mJ/pin), and microneedling (2.0 mm). Immediately after poly- l -lactic acid (PLLA), hyaluronic acid gel, calcium hydroxylapatite, and black tissue marking dye were topically applied. After treatment, biopsies were collected for histologic evaluation. RESULTS Histology revealed that PLLA and black dye were found in greatest abundance, hyaluronic acid was found to a lesser extent, and calcium hydroxylapatite was least found within channels created by fractional CO 2 laser. Microneedling was effective only at delivering black dye, whereas FRMN failed to show significant channel formation or delivery of the studied products. CONCLUSION Among the devices and fillers studied, fractional CO 2 laser and PLLA proved to be the most effective combination for laser/device-assisted filler delivery. Neither microneedling nor FRMN was effective as devices to enhance filler delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Cervantes
- Harvard Combined Dermatology Residency Training Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Yu-Feng Chang
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Hye Jin Chung
- Department of Dermatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang JV, Friedman PM, Rodeberg D, Konda A, Parker C, Geronemus RG. Enhancing Skin Uptake of Topical Antioxidants With 1,440-nm Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser Pretreatment. Dermatol Surg 2022; 48:927-931. [PMID: 36054044 DOI: 10.1097/dss.0000000000003531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Energy-based devices, such as nonablative lasers, are a promising method to enhance the delivery and absorption of topically applied molecules. OBJECTIVE To characterize ex vivo uptake of common antioxidant topicals after pretreatment with a nonablative laser wavelength. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using donor human skin tissue, uptake of 3 topical antioxidants was analyzed (C E Ferulic with 15% l-ascorbic acid [15% vitamin C serum], Phloretin CF with ferulic acid [10% vitamin C serum], and Phyto+ [botanical serum]; SkinCeuticals, Dallas, TX; 2010 formulations) after pretreatment with a 1,440-nm nonablative fractional diode laser. RESULTS Pretreatment with the 1,440-nm laser enhanced uptake of 15% and 10% vitamin C serums by approximately 10 and 21 times, respectively, compared to controls. Laser pretreatment also enhanced uptake of botanical serum by approximately 6 times relative to controls. Permeation of vitamin C and botanical serums was also enhanced through laser pretreatment. CONCLUSION Nonablative laser pretreatment increased uptake and permeation of topical antioxidants. Optimizing treatment requires consideration of the device and treatment parameters as well as the properties of the topical formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan V Wang
- Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York, New York, New York
| | - Paul M Friedman
- Laser & Skin Surgery Center of New York, New York, New York
- Dermatology & Laser Surgery Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Labadie JG, Ibrahim SA, Worley B, Kang BY, Rakita U, Rigali S, Arndt KA, Bernstein E, Brauer JA, Chandra S, Didwania A, DiGiorgio C, Donelan M, Dover JS, Galadari H, Geronemus RG, Goldman MP, Haedersdal M, Hruza G, Ibrahimi OA, Kauvar A, Kelly KM, Krakowski AC, Miest R, Orringer JS, Ozog DM, Ross EV, Shumaker PR, Sobanko JF, Suozzi K, Taylor MB, Teng JMC, Uebelhoer NS, Waibel J, Wanner M, Ratchev I, Christensen RE, Poon E, Miller CH, Alam M. Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:1193-1201. [PMID: 35976634 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) is used for various medical and cosmetic applications. However, there is insufficient evidence-based guidance to assist clinicians performing LADD. Objective To develop recommendations for the safe and effective use of LADD. Evidence Review A systematic literature review of Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and MEDLINE was conducted in December 2019 to identify publications reporting research on LADD. A multidisciplinary panel was convened to draft recommendations informed by the systematic review; they were refined through 2 rounds of Delphi survey, 2 consensus meetings, and iterative review by all panelists until unanimous consensus was achieved. Findings Of the 48 published studies of ablative fractional LADD that met inclusion criteria, 4 were cosmetic studies; 21, oncologic; and 23, medical (not cosmetic/oncologic), and 6 publications of nonablative fractional LADD were included at the request of the expert panel, producing a total of 54 studies. Thirty-four studies (63.0%) were deemed to have low risk of bias, 17 studies (31.5%) had moderate risk, and 3 (5.5%) had serious risk. The key findings that informed the guidelines developed by the expert panel were as follows: LADD is safe in adults and adolescents (≥12 years) with all Fitzpatrick skin types and in patients with immunosuppression; it is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ, actinic cheilitis, hypertrophic scars, and keloids; it is useful for epidermal and dermal analgesia; drug delivery may be increased through the application of heat, pressure, or occlusion, or by using an aqueous drug solution; laser settings should be selected to ensure that channel diameter is greater than the delivered molecule; antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended, except with impaired wound healing; antiviral prophylaxis is recommended when treating the face and genitalia; and antifungal prophylaxis is not recommended. The guideline's 15 recommendations address 5 areas of LADD use: (I) indications and contraindications; (II) parameters to report; (III) optimization of drug delivery; (IV) safety considerations; and (V) prophylaxis for bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and Delphi consensus approach culminated in an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for safe and effective use of LADD in a variety of applications. Future research will further improve our understanding of this novel treatment technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica G Labadie
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah A Ibrahim
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brandon Worley
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Bianca Y Kang
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Uros Rakita
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sarah Rigali
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kenneth A Arndt
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Eric Bernstein
- Main Line Center for Laser Surgery, Ardmore, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeremy A Brauer
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York
| | - Sunandana Chandra
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aashish Didwania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Mattias Donelan
- Shriners Hospital for Children-Boston, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeffrey S Dover
- SkinCare Physicians, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.,Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Hassan Galadari
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Mitchel P Goldman
- Cosmetic Laser Dermatology, West Dermatology Company, San Diego, California
| | - Merete Haedersdal
- Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - George Hruza
- Departments of Dermatology and Otolaryngology, St Louis University-Laser and Dermatologic Surgery Center, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Arielle Kauvar
- New York Laser & Skin Care, New York.,New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Kristen M Kelly
- Department of Dermatology, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Irvine
| | - Andrew C Krakowski
- Department of Dermatology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Easton, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel Miest
- Department of Dermatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jeffrey S Orringer
- Department of Dermatology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - David M Ozog
- Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | - Peter R Shumaker
- Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System and University of California, San Diego, California
| | - Joseph F Sobanko
- Department of Dermatology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathleen Suozzi
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Mark B Taylor
- Gateway Aesthetic Institute & Laser Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Joyce M C Teng
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | - Jill Waibel
- Miami Dermatology and Laser Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Molly Wanner
- Department of Dermatology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Ina Ratchev
- Section of Cutaneous Surgery, Northwestern Medical Group, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rachel E Christensen
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Emily Poon
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Corinne H Miller
- Galter Health Sciences Library & Learning Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Murad Alam
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Otolaryngology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|