1
|
Goncin U, Liu KK, Rawlyk B, Dalkilic S, Walker MEJ, Norton J, Hedlin P. Comparison of the ClearSight™ finger cuff monitor versus invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in elective cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth 2024:10.1007/s12630-024-02834-x. [PMID: 39317830 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-024-02834-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the acceptability of the ClearSight™ system (Edwards Lifesciences Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) for continuous blood pressure monitoring during elective cardiac surgery compared with arterial catheterization. METHODS We enrolled 30 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery in a prospective observational study. Blood pressure measurements were recorded every 10 sec intraoperatively. We determined agreement based on the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) recommendations. Statistical analysis included fixed bias (difference of measurements between methods), percentage error (accuracy between ClearSight measurement and expected measurement from arterial line), and interchangeability (ability to substitute ClearSight monitor without effecting overall outcome of analysis). We used a paired samples t test to compare the time required for placing each monitor. RESULTS We found fixed bias in the differences between the ClearSight monitor and invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in systolic blood pressure (SBP; mean difference, 8.7; P < 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; mean difference, -2.2; P < 0.001), but not in mean arterial pressure (MAP; mean difference, -0.5; P < 0.001). Bland-Altman plots showed that the means of the limits of agreement were greater than 5 mm Hg for SBP, DBP, and MAP. The percentage errors for SBP, DBP, and MAP were lower than the cutoff we calculated from the invasive arterial blood pressure measurements. Average interchangeability rates were 38% for SBP, 50% for DBP, and 50% for MAP. Placement of the ClearSight finger cuff was significantly faster compared with arterial catheterization (mean [standard deviation], 1.7 [0.6] min vs 5.6 [4.1] min; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In this prospective observational study, we did not find the ClearSight system to be an acceptable substitute for invasive arterial blood pressure measurement in elective cardiac surgery patients according to AAMI guidelines. Nevertheless, based on statistical standards, there is evidence to suggest otherwise. STUDY REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT05825937 ); first submitted 11 April 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Una Goncin
- Provincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Kaixuan K Liu
- Provincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Brooklyn Rawlyk
- Provincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Sara Dalkilic
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Mary Ellen J Walker
- Provincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Jonathan Norton
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Peter Hedlin
- Provincial Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
- Provincial Department of Anesthesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Royal University Hospital, G525-103 Hospital Dr., Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noto A, Chalkias A, Madotto F, Ball L, Bignami EG, Cecconi M, Guarracino F, Messina A, Morelli A, Princi P, Sanfilippo F, Scolletta S, Tritapepe L, Cortegiani A. Continuous vs intermittent Non-Invasive blood pressure MONitoring in preventing postoperative organ failure (niMON): study protocol for an open-label, multicenter randomized trial. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2024; 4:7. [PMID: 38321507 PMCID: PMC10845743 DOI: 10.1186/s44158-024-00142-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood pressure has become one of the most important vital signs to monitor in the perioperative setting. Recently, the Italian Society of Anesthesia Analgesia Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) recommended, with low level of evidence, continuous monitoring of blood pressure during the intraoperative period. Continuous monitoring allows for early detection of hypotension, which may potentially lead to a timely treatment. Whether the ability to detect more hypotension events by continuous noninvasive blood pressure (C-NiBP) monitoring can improve patient outcomes is still unclear. Here, we report the rationale, study design, and statistical analysis plan of the niMON trial, which aims to evaluate the effect of intraoperative C-NiBP compared with intermittent (I-NiBP) monitoring on postoperative myocardial and renal injury. METHODS The niMon trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, international, open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive C-NiBP or I-NiBP as an intraoperative monitoring strategy. The proportion of patients who develop myocardial injury in the first postoperative week is the primary outcome; the secondary outcomes are the proportions of patients who develop postoperative AKI, in-hospital mortality rate, and 30 and 90 postoperative days events. A sample size of 1265 patients will provide a power of 80% to detect a 4% absolute reduction in the rate of the primary outcome. CONCLUSIONS The niMON data will provide evidence to guide the choice of the most appropriate intraoperative blood pressure monitoring strategy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05496322, registered on the 5th of August 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Noto
- Division of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Human Pathology of the Adult and Evolutive Age "Gaetano Barresi", Policlinico "G. Martino", University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
| | - Athanasios Chalkias
- Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-5158, USA
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Fabiana Madotto
- Dipartimento Area Emergenza Urgenza, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Ball
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elena Giovanna Bignami
- Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Division, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Moltancini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, 20072, Italy
| | - Fabio Guarracino
- Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Messina
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, 20089, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Moltancini 4, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, 20072, Italy
| | - Andrea Morelli
- Department Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Rome, "La Sapienza," Policlinico Umberto Primo, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro Princi
- Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche, CNR-IPCF, Messina, Italy
| | - Filippo Sanfilippo
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, "Policlinico-San Marco" University Hospital, Catania, Italy
| | - Sabino Scolletta
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Luigi Tritapepe
- Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Cortegiani
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Science, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Anesthesia Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wolfskeil M, Bafort V, Besard M, Moerman A, De Hert S, Vanpeteghem C. Continuous Noninvasive Blood Pressure Measurement With "ClearSight" Compared to Standard Intermittent Blood Pressure Measurement in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease. Are Potential Differences Influenced by Phenylephrine or Dobutamine? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2023; 37:2470-2474. [PMID: 37657998 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the agreement between continuous noninvasive blood pressure measurement with the ClearSight system (cNIBP-CS) and standard intermittent noninvasive blood pressure measurement (iNIBP) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Additionally, the influence of vasoactive medication on potential measurement differences was assessed. DESIGN A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. SETTING At a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS Thirty-four patients with PAD undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the lower limbs. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Continuous noninvasive blood pressures were measured with the "ClearSight" system and compared to standard iNIBPs. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean bias of 13 mmHg (±15) between cNIBP-CS and iNIBP, with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) ranging from -17 to 42 mmHg. When comparing both medication groups, a similar mean bias was found for phenylephrine and dobutamine (12 mmHg [±13] and 13 mmHg [±13], respectively). CONCLUSION In this study, in patients with PAD, cNIBP-CS showed an underestimation of blood pressure compared to iNIBP in phenylephrine- and dobutamine-treated patients. Compared to previous studies, a larger bias and wider 95% LOA were found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha Wolfskeil
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Vincent Bafort
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Milan Besard
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Anneliese Moerman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Stefan De Hert
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Caroline Vanpeteghem
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xiong J, Xu M, Hui K, Zhou J, Zhang J, Duan M, Zhang L. Agreement between distal and forearm radial arterial pressures in patients undergoing prone spinal surgery: a prospective, self-controlled, observational study. J Int Med Res 2023; 51:3000605231188285. [PMID: 37646630 PMCID: PMC10469259 DOI: 10.1177/03000605231188285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To test agreement and interchangeability between distal (dRA) and forearm radial arterial (RA) pressures (AP) during general anesthesia (GA) for prone spinal surgery. METHODS This prospective observational study involved 40 patients scheduled for GA spinal surgery. The right dRA and left forearm RA were cannulated in all patients to continuously measure invasive blood pressures (IBP). We compared the agreement and trending ability of systolic AP (SAP), diastolic AP (DAP), and mean AP (MAP) at each site 15 minutes after tracheal intubation, start of surgery, 30 and 60 minutes after the start of surgery, and after skin suturing. RESULTS Paired BP values (n = 184) (37 cases) were analyzed. The bias (standard deviation), limits of agreement, and percentage error were: SAP: 0.19 (3.03), -5.75 to 6.12, and 5.04%; DAP: -0.06 (1.75), -3.50 to 3.38, and 5.10%; and MAP: 0.08 (1.52), -2.90 to 3.05, and 3.54%, respectively. The linear regression coefficients of determination were 0.981, 0.982, and 0.988 for SAPs, DAPs, and MAPs, respectively; four-quadrant plot concordance rates were 95.11%, 92.03%, and 92.66%, respectively. CONCLUSION All arterial BPs showed good agreement and trending capabilities for both the dRA and RA. The dRA may be substituted for the RA in IBP monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingwei Xiong
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Miaomiao Xu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Kangli Hui
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jiejie Zhou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Manlin Duan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, BenQ Medical Center, The Affiliated BenQ Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lidong Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jinling Hospital, Jinling School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loreto M, Pisanti M, Celentani M, Pasta G, Erman A, Santangelo C, Giaccari LG, Sansone P, Villani R. Non invasive hemodynamic monitoring for fluids and blood resuscitation during placenta praevia accreta cesarean delivery: a retrospective observational study. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE (ONLINE) 2022; 2:54. [PMID: 37386677 DOI: 10.1186/s44158-022-00083-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We carry out a retrospective observational analysis of clinical records of patients with major placenta praevia who underwent cesarean section surgery over a period of 20 months in our hospital. Out of a total of 40 patients, 20 were subjected to Goal-Directed Therapy (GDT) implemented with non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring using the EV1000 ClearSight system (Group I) and 20 to standard hemodynamic monitoring (Group II). Given the risk of conspicuous blood loss, this study evaluate the impact on maternal and fetal health of GDT relative to standard hemodynamic monitoring. RESULTS Average total infusion of fluids was 1600 +/- 350 ml. Use of blood products occurred in 29 patients (72,5%), of which 11 had a hysterectomy and 8 were treated with Bakri Balloons. For 2 patients > 1000 mL of concentrated red blood cells were used. When stroke volume index SVI dropped below 35 mL/m2/beat, it responded well to the infusion of at least 2 crystalloid boluses (5 ml/kg) in 7 patients. Cardiac index (CI) increased in 8 patients in concomitance with a reduction in medium arterial pressure (MAP), but the use of ephedrine (10 mg iv) re-established acceptable baseline values. Group I means are higher than Group II means for MAP, lower for RBC usage, end-of-surgery maternal lactates and fetal pH, and for LOS. Statistical analysis determines that the null hypotheses of equalities between Groups I and II can be rejected for all measures apart from MAP at baseline and induction. Proportions of serious complications in Groups I and II are respectively 10% and 32% and Boschloo's test rejects the null of equality of proportions against the alternative hypothesis of lower proportion of occurrence in Group I than in Group II. CONCLUSIONS Hypovolemia can lead to vasoconstriction and inadequate perfusion with decreased oxygen delivery to organs and peripheral tissues and ultimately cause organ dysfunction. Despite the small sample size due to the rarity of the pathology, our statistical analysis finds evidence in favor of more favorable clinical outcomes for patients who received GDT implemented with non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring infusion relative to patients who received standard hemodynamic monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Loreto
- Hospital of National Relevance "A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Massimo Pisanti
- Hospital of National Relevance "A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Celentani
- Department of Economics, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gilda Pasta
- National Cancer Institute IRCCS - "G. Pascale" Foundation, Naples, Italy
| | - Alfredo Erman
- Fatebenefratelli "S. Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Romolo Villani
- Hospital of National Relevance "A. Cardarelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhang W, Lu H, Liu J, Ou A, Zhang P, Zhong J. The consistency of invasive and non-invasive arterial blood pressure for the assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation in NICU patients. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1032353. [PMID: 36588893 PMCID: PMC9796817 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1032353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Studies of the clinical application of dynamic cerebral autoregulation show considerable variations, and differences in blood pressure devices may be one of the reasons for this variation. Few studies have examined the consistency of invasive and non-invasive arterial blood pressure for evaluating cerebral autoregulation. We attempted to investigate the agreement between invasive and non-invasive blood pressure methods in the assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation with transfer function analysis. Methods Continuous cerebral blood flow velocity and continuous invasive and non-invasive arterial blood pressure were simultaneously recorded for 15 min. Transfer function analysis was applied to derive the phase shift, gain and coherence function at all frequency bands from the first 5, 10, and 15 min of the 15-min recordings. The consistency was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient. Results The consistency of invasive and noninvasive blood pressure methods for the assessment of dynamic cerebral autoregulation was poor at 5 min, slightly improved at 10 min, and good at 15 min. The values of the phase shift at the low-frequency band measured by the non-invasive device were higher than those measured with invasive equipment. The coherence function values measured by the invasive technique were higher than the values derived from the non-invasive method. Conclusion Both invasive and non-invasive arterial blood pressure methods have good agreement in evaluating dynamic cerebral autoregulation when the recording duration reaches 15 min. The phase shift values measured with non-invasive techniques are higher than those measured with invasive devices. We recommend selecting the most appropriate blood pressure device to measure cerebral autoregulation based on the disease, purpose, and design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijun Zhang
- Department of Brain Function, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongji Lu
- Department of Neurological Intensive Care Unit, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jia Liu
- Department of Advanced Computing and Digital Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Aihua Ou
- Department of Big Data Research of TCM, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pandeng Zhang
- Department of Advanced Computing and Digital Engineering, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jingxin Zhong
- Department of Brain Function, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Helmer P, Helf D, Sammeth M, Winkler B, Hottenrott S, Meybohm P, Kranke P. The Use of Non-Invasive Continuous Blood Pressure Measuring (ClearSight®) during Central Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section—A Retrospective Validation Study. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11154498. [PMID: 35956113 PMCID: PMC9369920 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The close monitoring of blood pressure during a caesarean section performed under central neuraxial anaesthesia should be the standard of safe anaesthesia. As classical oscillometric and invasive blood pressure measuring have intrinsic disadvantages, we investigated a novel, non-invasive technique for continuous blood pressure measuring. Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective data analysis, the reliability of continuous non-invasive blood pressure measuring using ClearSight® (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation) is validated in 31 women undergoing central neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean section. In addition, patients and professionals evaluated ClearSight® through questioning. Results: 139 measurements from 11 patients were included in the final analysis. Employing Bland–Altman analyses, we identified a bias of −10.8 mmHg for systolic, of −0.45 mmHg for diastolic and of +0.68 mmHg for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Pooling all paired measurements resulted in a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 for systolic, of 0.67 for diastolic and of 0.75 for mean arterial blood pressure. Compensating the interindividual differences in linear regressions of the paired measurements provided improved correlation coefficients of 0.73 for systolic, of 0.9 for diastolic and of 0.89 for mean arterial blood pressure measurements. Discussion: Diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure are within an acceptable range of deviation from the reference method, according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) in the patient collective under study. Both patients and professionals prefer ClearSight® to oscillometric blood pressure measurement in regard of comfort and handling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Helmer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (P.H.); (D.H.); (M.S.); (B.W.); (S.H.); (P.M.)
| | - Daniel Helf
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (P.H.); (D.H.); (M.S.); (B.W.); (S.H.); (P.M.)
| | - Michael Sammeth
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (P.H.); (D.H.); (M.S.); (B.W.); (S.H.); (P.M.)
- Department of Applied Sciences, Coburg University, Friedrich-Streib-Str. 2, 96450 Coburg, Germany
| | - Bernd Winkler
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (P.H.); (D.H.); (M.S.); (B.W.); (S.H.); (P.M.)
| | - Sebastian Hottenrott
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (P.H.); (D.H.); (M.S.); (B.W.); (S.H.); (P.M.)
| | - Patrick Meybohm
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (P.H.); (D.H.); (M.S.); (B.W.); (S.H.); (P.M.)
| | - Peter Kranke
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Str. 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany; (P.H.); (D.H.); (M.S.); (B.W.); (S.H.); (P.M.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hansen J, Pohlmann M, Beckmann JH, Klose P, Gruenewald M, Renner J, Lorenzen U, Elke G. Comparison of oscillometric, non-invasive and invasive arterial pressure monitoring in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery – a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:83. [PMID: 35346046 PMCID: PMC8962134 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01619-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oscillometric, non-invasive blood pressure measurement (NIBP) is the first choice of blood pressure monitoring in the majority of low and moderate risk surgeries. In patients with morbid obesity, however, it is subject to several limitations. The aim was to compare arterial pressure monitoring by NIBP and a non-invasive finger-cuff technology (Nexfin®) with the gold-standard invasive arterial pressure (IAP). Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective observational, single centre cohort study, systolic (SAP), diastolic (DAP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured at 16 defined perioperative time points including posture changes, fluid bolus administration and pneumoperitoneum (PP) in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Absolute arterial pressures by NIBP, Nexfin® and IAP were compared using correlation and Bland Altman analyses. Interchangeability was defined by a mean difference ≤ 5 mmHg (SD ≤8 mmHg). Percentage error (PE) was calculated as an additional statistical estimate. For hemodynamic trending, concordance rates were analysed according to the Critchley criterion. Results Sixty patients (mean body mass index of 49.2 kg/m2) were enrolled and data from 56 finally analysed. Pooled blood pressure values of all time points showed a significant positive correlation for both NIPB and Nexfin® versus IAP. Pooled PE for NIBP versus IAP was 37% (SAP), 35% (DAP) and 30% (MAP), for Nexfin versus IAP 23% (SAP), 26% (DAP) and 22% (MAP). Correlation of MAP was best and PE lowest before induction of anesthesia for NIBP versus IAP (r = 0.72; PE 24%) and after intraoperative fluid bolus administration for Nexfin® versus IAP (r = 0.88; PE: 17.2%). Concordance of MAP trending was 90% (SAP 85%, DAP 89%) for NIBP and 91% (SAP 90%, DAP 86%) for Nexfin®. MAP trending was best during intraoperative ATP positioning for NIBP (97%) and at induction of anesthesia for Nexfin® (97%). Conclusion As compared with IAP, interchangeability of absolute pressure values could neither be shown for NIBP nor Nexfin®, however, NIBP showed poorer overall correlation and precision. Overall trending ability was generally high with Nexfin® surpassing NIBP. Nexfin® may likely render individualized decision-making in the management of different hemodynamic stresses during laparoscopic bariatric surgery, particularly where NIBP cannot be reliably established. Trial registration The non-interventional, observational study was registered retrospectively at (NCT03184285) on June 12, 2017.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fassaert LMM, Plate JDJ, Westerink J, Immink RV, de Borst GJ. The ClearSight System for Postoperative Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring After Carotid Endarterectomy: A Validation Study. Am J Hypertens 2022; 35:164-172. [PMID: 34505631 PMCID: PMC8807161 DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpab140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of postoperative events in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are of hemodynamic origin, requiring preventive strict postoperative arterial blood pressure (BP) control. This study aimed to assess whether BP monitoring with noninvasive beat-to-beat ClearSight finger BP (BPCS) can replace invasive beat-to-beat radial artery BP (BPRAD) in the postoperative phase. METHODS This study was a single-center clinical validation study using a prespecified study protocol. In 48 patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, BPCS and BPRAD were monitored ipsilateral in a simultaneous manner during a 6-hour period on the recovery unit following CEA. Primary endpoints were accuracy and precision of BP derived by ClearSight (Edward Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) vs. the reference standard (Arbocath 20 G, Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) to investigate if BPCS is a reliable noninvasive alternative for BP monitoring postoperatively in CEA patients. Validation was guided by the standard set by the Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), considering a BP-monitor adequate when bias (precision) is <5 (8) mm Hg. Secondary endpoint was percentage under- and overtreatment, defined as exceedance of individual postoperative systolic BP threshold by BPRAD or BPCS in contrast to BPCS or BPRAD, respectively. RESULTS The bias (precision) of BPCS compared to BPRAD was -10 (13.6), 8 (7.2) and 4 (7.8) mm Hg for systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP), respectively. Based on BPCS, undertreatment was 5.6% and overtreatment was 2.4%; however, percentages of undertreatment quadrupled for lower systolic BP thresholds. CONCLUSIONS Noninvasive MAP, but not systolic and diastolic BP, was similar to invasive BPRAD during postoperative observation following CEA, based on AAMI criteria. However, as systolic BP is currently leading in postoperative monitoring to adjust BP therapy on, BPCS is not a reliable alternative for BPRAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie M M Fassaert
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joost D J Plate
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Westerink
- Department of Vascular Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rogier V Immink
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gert J de Borst
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bodys-Pełka A, Kusztal M, Boszko M, Główczyńska R, Grabowski M. Non-Invasive Continuous Measurement of Haemodynamic Parameters-Clinical Utility. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10214929. [PMID: 34768449 PMCID: PMC8584279 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The evaluation and monitoring of patients’ haemodynamic parameters are essential in everyday clinical practice. The application of continuous, non-invasive measurement methods is a relatively recent solution. CNAP, ClearSight and many other technologies have been introduced to the market. The use of these techniques for assessing patient eligibility before cardiac procedures, as well as for intraoperative monitoring is currently being widely investigated. Their numerous advantages, including the simplicity of application, time- and cost-effectiveness, and the limited risk of infection, could enforce their further development and potential utility. However, some limitations and contradictions should also be discussed. The aim of this paper is to briefly describe the new findings, give practical examples of the clinical utility of these methods, compare them with invasive techniques, and review the literature on this subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleksandra Bodys-Pełka
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; (A.B.-P.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (M.G.)
- Doctoral School, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej Kusztal
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; (A.B.-P.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (M.G.)
| | - Maria Boszko
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; (A.B.-P.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (M.G.)
| | - Renata Główczyńska
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; (A.B.-P.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (M.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-5992-616
| | - Marcin Grabowski
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland; (A.B.-P.); (M.K.); (M.B.); (M.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee SW, Lee S, Kim H, Kim YJ, Kim M, Choi JH. Accuracy of noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring using ClearSight during one-lung ventilation. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e25152. [PMID: 33726000 PMCID: PMC7982160 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000025152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Noninvasive continuous arterial pressure monitoring may be clinically useful in patients who require continuous blood pressure monitoring in situations where arterial catheter placement is limited. Many previous studies on the accuracy of the noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitoring method reported various results. However, there is no research on the effectiveness of noninvasive arterial pressure monitoring during one-lung ventilation. The purpose of this study was to compare arterial blood pressure obtained through invasive method and noninvasive method by using ClearSight during one-lung ventilation.In this retrospective observational study, a total of 26 patients undergoing one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgery at a single institution between March and July 2019 were recruited. All patients in this study were cannulated on their radial artery to measure continuously invasive blood pressures and applied ClearSight on the ipsilateral side of the cannulated arm. We compared and analyzed the agreement and trendability of blood pressure recorded with invasive and noninvasive methods during one-lung ventilation.Blood pressure and pulse rate showed a narrower limit of agreement with a percentage error value of around 30%. In addition, the tracking ability of each measurement could be determined by the concordance rate, all of which were below acceptable limits (92%).In noninvasive arterial blood pressure monitoring using ClearSight, mean blood pressure and pulse rate show acceptable agreement with the invasive method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Wook Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul
| | - Sangho Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul
| | - Hyungtae Kim
- Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University
| | - Yun-Jong Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital
| | - Mihyeon Kim
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital
| | - Jeong-Hyun Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Clinical Evaluation of a High-fidelity Upper Arm Cuff to Measure Arterial Blood Pressure during Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology 2020; 133:997-1006. [PMID: 33048167 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In most patients having noncardiac surgery, blood pressure is measured with the oscillometric upper arm cuff method. Although the method is noninvasive and practical, it is known to overestimate intraarterial pressure in hypotension and to underestimate it in hypertension. A high-fidelity upper arm cuff incorporating a hydraulic sensor pad was recently developed. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether noninvasive blood pressure measurements with the new high-fidelity cuff correspond to invasive measurements with a femoral artery catheter, especially at low blood pressure. METHODS Simultaneous measurements of blood pressure recorded from a femoral arterial catheter and from the high-fidelity upper arm cuff were compared in 110 patients having major abdominal surgery or neurosurgery. RESULTS 550 pairs of blood pressure measurements (5 pairs per patient) were considered for analysis. For mean arterial pressure measurements, the average bias was 0 mmHg, and the precision was 3 mmHg. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.96 (P < 0.0001; 95% CI, 0.96 to 0.97), and the percentage error was 9%. Error grid analysis showed that the proportions of mean arterial pressure measurements done with the high-fidelity cuff method were 98.4% in zone A (no risk), 1.6% in zone B (low risk) and 0% in zones C, D, and E (moderate, significant, and dangerous risk, respectively). The high-fidelity cuff method detected mean arterial pressure values less than 65 mmHg with a sensitivity of 84% (95% CI, 74 to 92%) and a specificity of 97% (95% CI, 95% to 98%). To detect changes in mean arterial pressure of more than 5 mmHg, the concordance rate between the two methods was 99.7%. Comparable accuracy and precision were observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements. CONCLUSIONS The new high-fidelity upper arm cuff method met the current international standards in terms of accuracy and precision. It was also very accurate to track changes in blood pressure and reliably detect severe hypotension during noncardiac surgery. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee S, Chung J, Bae J, Cho YJ, Nam K, Jeon Y. Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring (ClearSight System) and Ankle Blood Pressure Measurements as Alternatives to Conventional Arm Blood Pressure. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9113615. [PMID: 33182672 PMCID: PMC7696586 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Measuring blood pressure (BP) via a pneumatic cuff placed around the arm has long been the standard method. However, in clinical situations where BP monitoring at the arm is difficult, the ankle is frequently used instead. We compared continuous non-invasive blood pressure (CNBP) measurements obtained at the finger, ankle BP and arm BP in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Arm BP, ankle BP (both obtained with a conventional pneumatic cuff) and CNBP measurements were obtained every 2.5 min during surgery. Correlation and Bland–Altman analyses were performed and differences among measurements were analyzed using a linear mixed model. A total of 245 sets of BP measurements were obtained from 10 patients. All systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean blood pressure (MBP) measurements of ankle BP and CNBP were positively correlated with the arm BP measurements (Spearman rho 0.688–0.836, p < 0.001 for each correlation). The difference between CNBP and arm SBP was significantly smaller (least squares mean (95% confidence interval): −6.03 (−11.40, −0.67)) compared to that between ankle and arm SBP (least squares mean (95% CI): −15.32 (−20.69, −9.96), p = 0.019). However, this significant difference was not observed in DBP and MBP (−1.23 vs. 1.75, p = 0.190 and −3.85 vs. −2.63, p = 0.604, respectively). Ankle SBP measurements showed larger differences from arm SBP measurements than did CNBP SBP measurements in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. CNBP could serve as a useful alternative to ankle BP when standard arm BP measurements cannot be obtained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Yunseok Jeon
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-2-2072-3108; Fax: +82-2-747-8362
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Continuous noninvasive pulse wave analysis using finger cuff technologies for arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125:25-37. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
15
|
Ankle blood pressure is not a reliable surrogate for brachial blood pressure in young healthy patients undergoing general anaesthesia: A prospective observational cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2020; 37:611-614. [PMID: 32516179 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
16
|
Performance of the Hypotension Prediction Index with non-invasive arterial pressure waveforms in non-cardiac surgical patients. J Clin Monit Comput 2020; 35:71-78. [PMID: 31989416 PMCID: PMC7889685 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00463-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
An algorithm derived from machine learning uses the arterial waveform to predict intraoperative hypotension some minutes before episodes, possibly giving clinician’s time to intervene and prevent hypotension. Whether the Hypotension Prediction Index works well with noninvasive arterial pressure waveforms remains unknown. We therefore evaluated sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the Index based on non-invasive arterial waveform estimates. We used continuous hemodynamic data measured from ClearSight (formerly Nexfin) noninvasive finger blood pressure monitors in surgical patients. We re-evaluated data from a trial that included 320 adults ≥ 45 years old designated ASA physical status 3 or 4 who had moderate-to-high-risk non-cardiac surgery with general anesthesia. We calculated sensitivity and specificity for predicting hypotension, defined as mean arterial pressure ≤ 65 mmHg for at least 1 min, and characterized the relationship with receiver operating characteristics curves. We also evaluated the number of hypotensive events at various ranges of the Hypotension Prediction Index. And finally, we calculated the positive predictive value for hypotension episodes when the Prediction Index threshold was 85. The algorithm predicted hypotension 5 min in advance, with a sensitivity of 0.86 [95% confidence interval 0.82, 0.89] and specificity 0.86 [0.82, 0.89]. At 10 min, the sensitivity was 0.83 [0.79, 0.86] and the specificity was 0.83 [0.79, 0.86]. And at 15 min, the sensitivity was 0.75 [0.71, 0.80] and the specificity was 0.75 [0.71, 0.80]. The positive predictive value of the algorithm prediction at an Index threshold of 85 was 0.83 [0.79, 0.87]. A Hypotension Prediction Index of 80–89 provided a median of 6.0 [95% confidence interval 5.3, 6.7] minutes warning before mean arterial pressure decreased to < 65 mmHg. The Hypotension Prediction Index, which was developed and validated with invasive arterial waveforms, predicts intraoperative hypotension reasonably well from non-invasive estimates of the arterial waveform. Hypotension prediction, along with appropriate management, can potentially reduce intraoperative hypotension. Being able to use the non-invasive pressure waveform will widen the range of patients who might benefit. Clinical Trial Number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02872896.
Collapse
|