Neuroprotective effects of intraoperative dexmedetomidine versus saline infusion combined with goal-directed haemodynamic therapy for patients undergoing cranial surgery: A randomised controlled trial

A Comprehensive Review on the Role of Melatonin's Anesthetic Applications in Pediatric Care

Anesthesia is critical to pediatric care, ensuring the safety and comfort of children undergoing medical procedures. With a growing interest in alternative anesthetic agents, melatonin has emerged as a promising candidate due to its sedative, analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties. This comprehensive review explores the potential applications of melatonin in pediatric anesthesia. We delve into the pharmacological characteristics of melatonin, its anesthetic properties, and its clinical applications in pediatric care, including preoperative sedation, adjunct to general anesthesia, postoperative pain management, and prevention of emergence delirium. Additionally, we discuss the safety profile of melatonin, potential adverse effects, and comparative analysis with traditional anesthetics. Finally, we highlight future research directions to provide insights into melatonin's role in pediatric anesthesia and its implications for clinical practice.

Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine plays a pivotal role in mitigating postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction while enhancing the overall quality of life among surgical patients. Nevertheless, the influence of dexmedetomidine on such complications in various anaesthesia techniques remains inadequately explored. As such, in the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate its effects on postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction.

METHODS

A number of databases were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine to other interventions in preventing postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction in non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical patients. These databases included PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Statistical analysis and graphing were performed using Review Manager, STATA, the second version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised controlled trials, and GRADE profiler.

MAIN RESULTS

This meta-analysis comprised a total of 24 randomised controlled trials, including 20 trials assessing postoperative delirium and 6 trials assessing postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Across these 24 studies, a statistically significant positive association was observed between intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine and a reduced incidence of postoperative delirium (RR: 0.55; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.64, p < 0.00001, I2 = 2%) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.96, p = 0.03, I2 = 60%). Subgroup analysis did not reveal a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative delirium between the general anaesthesia and non-general anaesthesia groups, but a significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Nonetheless, when the data were pooled, it was evident that the utilisation of dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased incidence of hypotension (RR: 1.42; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.86, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%) and bradycardia (RR: 1.66; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.26, p = 0.001, I2 = 0%) compared with other interventions. However, there was no significantly higher occurrence of hypertension in the DEX groups (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.81-2.24, p = 0.25, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with other interventions, intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion during non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical procedures may significantly reduce the risk of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. The results of subgroup analysis reveal a consistent preventive effect on postoperative delirium in both general and non-general anaesthesia groups. Meanwhile, continuous infusion during general anaesthesia was more effective in reducing the risk of cognitive dysfunction. Despite such findings, hypotension and bradycardia were more frequent in patients who received dexmedetomidine during surgery.

Electroencephalographic spectrogram-guided total intravenous anesthesia using dexmedetomidine and propofol prevents unnecessary anesthetic dosing during craniotomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

The bispectral index (BIS) may be unreliable to gauge anesthetic depth when dexmedetomidine is administered. By comparison, the electroencephalogram (EEG) spectrogram enables the visualization of the brain response during anesthesia and may prevent unnecessary anesthetic consumption.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 140 adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy who received total intravenous anesthesia using a combination of propofol and dexmedetomidine infusions. Patients were equally matched to the spectrogram group (maintaining the robust EEG alpha power during surgery) or the index group (maintaining the BIS score between 40 and 60 during surgery) based on the propensity score of age and surgical type. The primary outcome was the propofol dose. Secondary outcome was the postoperative neurological profile.

RESULTS

Patients in the spectrogram group received significantly less propofol (1585 ± 581 vs. 2314 ± 810 mg, P < 0.001). Fewer patients in the spectrogram group exhibited delayed emergence (1.4% vs. 11.4%, P = 0.033). The postoperative delirium profile was similar between the groups (profile P = 0.227). Patients in the spectrogram group exhibited better in-hospital Barthel's index scores changes (admission state: 83.6 ± 27.6 vs. 91.6 ± 17.1; discharge state: 86.4 ± 24.3 vs. 85.1 ± 21.5; group-time interaction P = 0.008). However, the incidence of postoperative neurological complications was similar between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG spectrogram-guided anesthesia prevents unnecessary anesthetic consumption during elective craniotomy. This may also prevent delayed emergence and improve postoperative Barthel index scores.

Effects of nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery on postoperative neurocognitive function: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Postoperative neurocognitive disorder following thoracoscopic surgery with general anaesthesia may be linked to reduced intraoperative cerebral oxygenation and perioperative inflammation, which can potentially be exacerbated by mechanical ventilation. However, nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery, which utilizes regional anaesthesia and maintains spontaneous breathing, provides a unique model for studying the potential benefits of avoiding mechanical ventilation. This approach allows investigation into the impact on perioperative neurocognitive profiles, inflammatory responses and intraoperative cerebral oxygen levels.

METHODS

In total, 110 patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery were randomly equally assigned to the intubated group and the nonintubated group. Regional cerebral oxygenation was monitored during surgery. Serum neuroinflammatory biomarkers, including interleukin-6 and glial fibrillary acidic protein, were measured at baseline (before surgery) and 24 h after surgery. Postoperative complication severity was compared using the Comprehensive Complication Index. The primary outcome was perioperative changes in neurocognitive test score, which was assessed at baseline, 24 h and 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients in the nonintubated group had higher neurocognitive test scores at 24 h (69.9 ± 10.5 vs 65.3 ± 11.8; P = 0.03) and 6 months (70.6 ± 6.7 vs 65.4 ± 8.1; P < 0.01) after surgery and significantly higher regional cerebral oxygenation over time during one-lung ventilation (P = 0.03). Patients in the intubated group revealed a significantly higher postoperative serum interleukin-6 level (group by time interaction, P = 0.04) and a trend towards a significantly higher serum glial fibrillary acidic protein level (group by time interaction, P = 0.11). Furthermore, patients in the nonintubated group had a significantly lower Comprehensive Complication Index (9.0 ± 8.2 vs 6.1 ± 7.1; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative neurocognitive recovery, more stable intraoperative cerebral oxygenation, ameliorated perioperative inflammation and attenuated postoperative complication severity.

Effect of dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium in patients undergoing awake craniotomies: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication, and it has a high incidence in neurosurgery patients. Awake craniotomy (AC) has been widely performed in patients with glioma in eloquent and motor areas. Most of the surgical procedure is frontotemporal craniotomy, and the operation duration has been getting longer. Patients undergoing AC are high-risk populations for POD. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) administration perioperatively might help to reduce the incidence of POD. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of Dex on POD in patients undergoing AC.

METHODS

The study is a prospective, single-center, double-blinded, paralleled-group, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing elective AC will be randomly assigned to the Dex group and the control group. Ten minutes before urethral catheterization, patients in the Dex group will be administered with a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.2 µg/kg/h until the end of dural closure. In the control group, patients will receive an identical volume of normal saline in the same setting. The primary outcome will be the cumulative incidence and severity of POD. It will be performed by using the confusion assessment method in the first 5 consecutive days after surgery. Secondary outcomes include quality of intraoperative awareness, stimulus intensity of neurological examination, pain severity, quality of recovery and sleep, and safety outcomes.

DISCUSSION

This study is to investigate whether the application of Dex could prevent POD in patients after undergoing AC and will provide strong evidence-based clinical practice on the impact of intraoperative interventions on preventing POD in AC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05195034. Registered on January 18, 2022.

Dexmedetomidine for the prevention of delirium in adults admitted to the intensive care unit or post-operative care unit: A systematic review of randomised clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess any benefit or harm, we conducted a systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) allocating adults to dexmedetomidine versus placebo/no intervention for the prevention of delirium in intensive care or post-operative care units.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, Embase, CENTRAL and other databases. The last search was 9 April 2022.

DATA EXTRACTION

Literature screening, data extraction and risk of bias volume 2 assessments were performed independently and in duplicate. Primary outcomes were occurrences of serious adverse events (SAEs), delirium and all-cause mortality. We used meta-analysis, Trial Sequential Analysis, and GRADE (Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Eighty-one RCTs (15,745 patients) provided data for our primary outcomes. Results from trials at low risk of bias showed that dexmedetomidine may reduce the occurrence of the most frequently reported SAEs (relative risk [RR] 0.69; 95% CI 0.43-1.09), cumulated SAEs (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-0.95) and the occurrence of delirium (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43-0.89). The certainty of evidence was very low for delirium. Mortality was very low in trials at low risk of bias (0.4% in the dexmedetomidine groups and 1.0% in the control groups) and meta-analysis did not provide conclusive evidence that dexmedetomidine may result in lower or higher all-cause mortality (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.18-1.21). There was a lack of information from trial results at low risk of bias for all primary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial results at low risk of bias showed that dexmedetomidine might reduce occurrences of SAEs and delirium, while no conclusive evidence was found for effects on all-cause mortality. The certainty of evidence ranged from very low for occurrence of delirium to low for the remaining outcomes.

Dexmedetomidine administration during brain tumour resection for prevention of postoperative delirium: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Delirium is common, especially after neurosurgery. Dexmedetomidine might reduce delirium by improving postoperative analgesia and sleep quality. We tested the primary hypothesis that dexmedetomidine administration during intracerebral tumour resection reduces the incidence of postoperative delirium.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in two tertiary-care hospitals in Beijing. We randomised 260 qualifying patients to either dexmedetomidine (n=130) or placebo (n=130). Subjects assigned to dexmedetomidine were given a loading dose of 0.6 μg kg^-1 followed by continuous infusion at 0.4 μg kg^-1 h^-1 until dural closure; subjects in the placebo group were given comparable volumes of normal saline. The primary outcome was the incidence of delirium, which was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method twice daily during the initial 5 postoperative days.

RESULTS

The average (standard deviation) age of participating patients was 45 (12) yr, duration of surgery was 4.2 (1.5) h, and patients assigned to dexmedetomidine were given an average of 126 (45) μg of dexmedetomidine. There was less delirium during the initial 5 postoperative days in patients assigned to dexmedetomidine (22%, 28 of 130 patients) than in those given placebo (46%, 60 of 130 patients) with a risk ratio of 0.51 (95% confidence interval: 0.36-0.74, P<0.001). Postoperative pain scores with movement, and recovery and sleep quality were improved by dexmedetomidine (P<0.001). The incidence of safety outcomes was similar in each group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prophylactic intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion reduced by half the incidence of delirium during the initial 5 postoperative days in patients recovering from elective brain tumour resection.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04674241.

Effects of Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Therapy Using a Noninvasive Finger-Cuff Monitoring Device on Intraoperative Cerebral Oxygenation and Early Delayed Neurocognitive Recovery in Patients Undergoing Beach Chair Position Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Perioperative cerebral desaturation events (CDEs) and delayed neurocognitive recovery are common among patients undergoing beach chair position (BCP) shoulder surgery and may be caused by cerebral hypoperfusion. This study tested the hypothesis that the application of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) would attenuate these conditions.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 70 adult patients undergoing BCP shoulder surgery to GDHT group or control at a 1:1 ratio. Cerebral oxygenation was monitored using near-infrared spectroscopy, and GDHT was administered using the ClearSight pulse wave analysis system. The primary outcome was CDE duration, whereas the secondary outcomes were CDE occurrence, delayed neurocognitive recovery occurrence, and Taiwanese version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Qmci-TW) test score on the first postoperative day (T 2 ) adjusted for the baseline score (on the day before surgery; T 1 ).

RESULTS

CDE duration was significantly shorter in the GDHT group (0 [0-0] vs 15 [0-75] min; median difference [95% confidence interval], -8 [-15 to 0] min; P = .007). Compared with the control group, fewer patients in the GDHT group experienced CDEs (23% vs 51%; relative risk [95% confidence interval], 0.44 [0.22-0.89]; P = .025) and mild delayed neurocognitive recovery (17% vs 40%; relative risk [95% confidence interval], 0.60 [0.39-0.93]; P = .034). The Qmci-TW scores at T 2 adjusted for the baseline scores at T 1 were significantly higher in the GDHT group (difference in means: 4 [0-8]; P = .033).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing GDHT using a noninvasive finger-cuff monitoring device stabilizes intraoperative cerebral oxygenation and is associated with improved early postoperative cognitive scores in patients undergoing BCP shoulder surgery.

The Role of miRNAs in Dexmedetomidine's Neuroprotective Effects against Brain Disorders

There are limited neuroprotective strategies for various central nervous system conditions in which fast and sustained management is essential. Neuroprotection-based therapeutics have become an intensively researched topic in the neuroscience field, with multiple novel promising agents, from natural products to mesenchymal stem cells, homing peptides, and nanoparticles-mediated agents, all aiming to significantly provide neuroprotection in experimental and clinical studies. Dexmedetomidine (DEX), an α2 agonist commonly used as an anesthetic adjuvant for sedation and as an opioid-sparing medication, stands out in this context due to its well-established neuroprotective effects. Emerging evidence from preclinical and clinical studies suggested that DEX could be used to protect against cerebral ischemia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury, neurodegenerative diseases, and postoperative cognitive disorders. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate gene expression at a post-transcriptional level, inhibiting the translation of mRNA into functional proteins. In vivo and in vitro studies deciphered brain-related miRNAs and dysregulated miRNA profiles after several brain disorders, including TBI, ischemic stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, and multiple sclerosis, providing emerging new perspectives in neuroprotective therapy by modulating these miRNAs. Experimental studies revealed that some of the neuroprotective effects of DEX are mediated by various miRNAs, counteracting multiple mechanisms in several disease models, such as lipopolysaccharides induced neuroinflammation, β-amyloid induced dysfunction, brain ischemic-reperfusion injury, and anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity models. This review aims to outline the neuroprotective mechanisms of DEX in brain disorders by modulating miRNAs. We address the neuroprotective effects of DEX by targeting miRNAs in modulating ischemic brain injury, ameliorating the neurotoxicity of anesthetics, reducing postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and improving the effects of neurodegenerative diseases.

Perioperative stroke: A perspective on challenges and opportunities for experimental treatment and diagnostic strategies

Perioperative stroke is an ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebral event during or up to 30 days after surgery. It is a feared condition due to a relatively high incidence, difficulties in timely detection, and unfavorable outcome compared to spontaneously occurring stroke. Recent preclinical data suggest that specific pathophysiological mechanisms such as aggravated neuroinflammation contribute to the detrimental impact of perioperative stroke. Conventional treatment options are limited in the perioperative setting due to difficult diagnosis and medications affecting coagulation in may cases. On the contrary, the chance to anticipate cerebrovascular events at the time of surgery may pave the way for prevention strategies. This review provides an overview on perioperative stroke incidence, related problems, and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Based on this analysis, we assess experimental stroke treatments including neuroprotective approaches, cell therapies, and conditioning medicine strategies regarding their potential use in perioperative stroke. Interestingly, the specific aspects of perioperative stroke might enable a more effective application of experimental treatment strategies such as classical neuroprotection whereas others including cell therapies may be of limited use. We also discuss experimental diagnostic options for perioperative stroke augmenting classical clinical and imaging stroke diagnosis. While some experimental stroke treatments may have specific advantages in perioperative stroke, the paucity of established guidelines or multicenter clinical research initiatives currently limits their thorough investigation.