1
|
Salgado-Garcia C, Moreno-Ballesteros A, Guardia-Jimena P, Sanchez-de-Mora E, Rebollo-Aguirre AC, Ramirez-Navarro A, Santos-Bueno A, Jimenez-Heffernan A. Role of the clinical radiopharmacist in patient safety during myocardial perfusion imaging with vasodilator stress agents. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2024; 43:84-90. [PMID: 38184070 DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
AIM To assess the radiopharmacist's role in a multidisciplinary team focused on the contraindications of regadenoson in order to ensure the safe use of pharmacologic vasodilator stress agents in patients undergoing SPECT-MPI. METHODS We ambispectively studied its safe use in 1905 patients (54.1% female, mean age: 66.6±11.7 years, range: 20-95 years). Sex, age, medical history, medications, drug allergies, and contraindications for stress testing were registered together with recommendations for the nuclear physician in charge. RESULTS Detected contraindications and corresponding recommendations were as follows: risk factors for QTc interval prolongation 7.5% - measurement of QTc interval previously to test and monitor ECG; prior stroke or TIA 4.2% - consider carotid stenosis assessment; salicylates/sulfonamides allergy 3.1% - use 99mTc-sestamibi; epilepsy or risk factors for seizures 2.4% - use of adenosine or reconsider test indication; systemic corticosteroid therapy for severe COPD 1.3% - reassessment of patient's condition; acute exacerbation of COPD 0.8% - defer test until acute episode is over; severe asthma 0.4% - do not perform test; methylxanthine ingestion 0.3% - avoid consumption previously; other 6.1% - evaluation of other contraindications. No contraindications were detected in 73.6% of patients. The test was canceled due to absolute contraindications in 2.9% of the requests. CONCLUSIONS Working in a systematic way, the radiopharmacist was able to detect a high number of issues related to regadenoson, with one out of four patients presenting some clinical contraindication. The recommendations given by the radiopharmacist were well accepted by the nuclear physicians who changed their approach contributing to increase the safety of patients referred for MPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Salgado-Garcia
- Radiopharmacy Unit (Department of Nuclear Medicine), Hospital Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain.
| | | | - P Guardia-Jimena
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain
| | - E Sanchez-de-Mora
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain
| | | | - A Ramirez-Navarro
- Radiopharmacy Unit (Department of Nuclear Medicine), Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - A Santos-Bueno
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Juan Ramon Jimenez, Huelva, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Melder A, Wittmann E, Bulubas L, Dornheim B, Kerber K, Vogelmann U, Campana M, Hubert J, Schmidt V, Heinen F, Padberg F, Landgraf MN. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a feasible, non-invasive, neuromodulatory intervention in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. A very first proof of concept. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2023; 47:131-142. [PMID: 37913649 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A neurobiological feature of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) is a global decrease in neuronal connectivity, which leads to significant impairments in everyday functionality. Non-invasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) could potentially positively influence neuronal plasticity but has not yet been studied in FASD. The present trial addresses this gap, making it the first-ever study of rTMS in FASD. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prospective clinical trial was conducted at the LMU University Hospital Munich and enrolled eight FASD participants aged 6-16. Six sessions of 1 Hz-rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex were administered two times a week for three weeks consisting of 1500 pulses at 90 % of resting motor threshold in four trains of 375s. Outcome measures investigated feasibility and treatment response of rTMS on executive functions, attention/impulsivity, social-emotional regulation and quality of life (QoL) via standardized tests and the FASD parents' app. RESULTS Adherence and retention rate were 100 %. Adverse events (AEs) were mild and self-limiting, resulting in a per-session risk of 53.3 %, with local paraesthesia accounting for 54.2 % of the AEs. There were individual relevant but no significant group-level improvements in the investigated functional cerebral domains or participants' QoL. The FASD parents' app showed no significant change in participants' daily functioning or caregivers' QoL. Caregivers' parental stress decreased significantly. CONCLUSION FASD is a very complex disorder that is difficult to treat. In addition, comorbidities as atypical responses to pharmacotherapies are frequent. For this reason, non-invasive, innovative therapies for children with FASD have to be developed. For the first time, rTMS was shown to be safe, tolerable, and acceptable and thus well feasible in paediatric patients with FASD. Further clinical studies with larger samples are needed to identify effective stimulation protocols and to evaluate treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Melder
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, German FASD Competence Center Bavaria, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Esther Wittmann
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, German FASD Competence Center Bavaria, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Lucia Bulubas
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Munich-Augsburg (CNBS(MA)), Germany
| | - Beate Dornheim
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Munich-Augsburg (CNBS(MA)), Germany
| | - Katharina Kerber
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, German FASD Competence Center Bavaria, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ulrike Vogelmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Munich-Augsburg (CNBS(MA)), Germany
| | - Mattia Campana
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Munich-Augsburg (CNBS(MA)), Germany
| | - Jasmin Hubert
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, German FASD Competence Center Bavaria, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Vivien Schmidt
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, German FASD Competence Center Bavaria, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian Heinen
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, German FASD Competence Center Bavaria, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Center for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Munich-Augsburg (CNBS(MA)), Germany
| | - Mirjam N Landgraf
- Department of Pediatric Neurology and Developmental Medicine, LMU Center for Development and Children with Medical Complexity, German FASD Competence Center Bavaria, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Csernus EA, Werber T, Kamondi A, Horvath AA. The Significance of Subclinical Epileptiform Activity in Alzheimer's Disease: A Review. Front Neurol 2022; 13:856500. [PMID: 35444602 PMCID: PMC9013745 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.856500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Hyperexcitability is a recently recognized contributor to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Subclinical epileptiform activity (SEA) is a neurophysiological sign of cortical hyperexcitability; however, the results of the studies in this field vary due to differences in the applied methodology. The aim of this review is to summarize the results of the related studies aiming to describe the characteristic features and significance of subclinical epileptiform discharges in the pathophysiologic process of AD from three different directions: (1) what SEA is; (2) why we should diagnose SEA, and (3) how we should diagnose SEA. We scrutinized both the completed and ongoing antiepileptic drug trials in AD where SEA served as a grouping variable or an outcome measure. SEA seems to appear predominantly in slow-wave sleep and in the left temporal region and to compromise cognitive functions. We clarify using supportive literature the high sensitivity of overnight electroencephalography (EEG) in the detection of epileptiform discharges. Finally, we present the most important research questions around SEA and provide an overview of the possible solutions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emoke Anna Csernus
- School of PhD Studies, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Neurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tom Werber
- Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Anita Kamondi
- Neurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Andras Attila Horvath
- Neurocognitive Research Center, National Institute of Mental Health, Neurology and Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary
- Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- *Correspondence: Andras Attila Horvath
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park S, Lee H, Kim JH, Jeon HL, Shin JY. Association between tramadol use and seizures: A nationwide case-case-time-control study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2022; 31:614-622. [PMID: 35141978 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Tramadol may lower the seizure threshold; however, there is no conclusive evidence to confirm this. This study aimed to determine whether the use of tramadol is associated with the occurrence of seizures. METHODS We conducted a case-case-time-control (CCTC) study by identifying patients who had received tramadol and seizure diagnosis in a nationwide healthcare database in South Korea between 2003 and 2015. Each case was matched for age and sex to one future case to adjust for time trends in exposure without selection bias from the use of an external control group. The use of tramadol was assessed during a risk period of 1-30 days, and two reference periods, 61-90 days and 91-120 days, preceding the first diagnosis of seizures. We calculated the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) by dividing the OR in cases (case-crossover) by the OR in future cases (control-crossover). We performed a dose-response analysis using the average daily dose. RESULTS We identified 2,523 incident cases with matched future cases (mean age, 45.4 years; 50% men). The aOR for seizure with tramadol use was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.43) in the CCTC analysis, with a case-crossover OR of 1.19 (0.98-1.43) and control-crossover OR of 1.27 (1.03-1.56). The dose-response analysis showed a similar trend in the main analysis: a low-dose aOR of 0.80 (0.50-1.28) and a high-dose aOR of 0.92 (0.41-2.11). CONCLUSION We could not identify a significant association between transient use of tramadol and incidence of seizures in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohee Park
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyesung Lee
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju Hwan Kim
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ha-Lim Jeon
- School of Pharmacy, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea
| | - Ju-Young Shin
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.,Department of Clinical Research Design & Evaluation, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Biohealth Regulatory Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmöller J, Carpenter LL, Cincotta M, Chen R, Daskalakis JD, Di Lazzaro V, Fox MD, George MS, Gilbert D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lefaucheur JP, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Miniussi C, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Quartarone A, Rotenberg A, Rothwell J, Rossini PM, Santarnecchi E, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wassermann EM, Zangen A, Ziemann U, Hallett M. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 132:269-306. [PMID: 33243615 PMCID: PMC9094636 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 599] [Impact Index Per Article: 149.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This article is based on a consensus conference, promoted and supported by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which took place in Siena (Italy) in October 2018. The meeting intended to update the ten-year-old safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings (Rossi et al., 2009). Therefore, only emerging and new issues are covered in detail, leaving still valid the 2009 recommendations regarding the description of conventional or patterned TMS protocols, the screening of subjects/patients, the need of neurophysiological monitoring for new protocols, the utilization of reference thresholds of stimulation, the managing of seizures and the list of minor side effects. New issues discussed in detail from the meeting up to April 2020 are safety issues of recently developed stimulation devices and pulse configurations; duties and responsibility of device makers; novel scenarios of TMS applications such as in the neuroimaging context or imaging-guided and robot-guided TMS; TMS interleaved with transcranial electrical stimulation; safety during paired associative stimulation interventions; and risks of using TMS to induce therapeutic seizures (magnetic seizure therapy). An update on the possible induction of seizures, theoretically the most serious risk of TMS, is provided. It has become apparent that such a risk is low, even in patients taking drugs acting on the central nervous system, at least with the use of traditional stimulation parameters and focal coils for which large data sets are available. Finally, new operational guidelines are provided for safety in planning future trials based on traditional and patterned TMS protocols, as well as a summary of the minimal training requirements for operators, and a note on ethics of neuroenhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Rossi
- Department of Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche e Neuroscienze, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Lab (SI-BIN Lab), University of Siena, Italy.
| | - Andrea Antal
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany; Institue of Medical Psychology, Otto-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Sven Bestmann
- Department of Movement and Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK and Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of New York, New York, NY, USA
| | - Carmen Brewer
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jürgen Brockmöller
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Linda L Carpenter
- Butler Hospital, Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Massimo Cincotta
- Unit of Neurology of Florence - Central Tuscany Local Health Authority, Florence, Italy
| | - Robert Chen
- Krembil Research Institute and Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeff D Daskalakis
- Center for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, Department of Medicine, Università Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy
| | - Michael D Fox
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Mark S George
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Donald Gilbert
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vasilios K Kimiskidis
- Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, AHEPA University Hospital, Greece
| | | | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (NBE), Aalto University School of Science, Aalto, Finland
| | - Jean Pascal Lefaucheur
- EA 4391, ENT Team, Faculty of Medicine, Paris Est Creteil University (UPEC), Créteil, France; Clinical Neurophysiology Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, (APHP), Créteil, France
| | - Letizia Leocani
- Department of Neurology, Institute of Experimental Neurology (INSPE), IRCCS-San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Sarah H Lisanby
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Carlo Miniussi
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
| | - Frank Padberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alvaro Pascual-Leone
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Center for Memory Health, Hebrew SeniorLife, USA; Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Guttmann Brain Health Institut, Institut Guttmann, Universitat Autonoma Barcelona, Spain
| | - Walter Paulus
- Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center, Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany
| | - Angel V Peterchev
- Departments of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Electrical & Computer Engineering, and Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Angelo Quartarone
- Department of Biomedical, Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alexander Rotenberg
- Department of Neurology, Division of Epilepsy and Clinical Neurophysiology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - John Rothwell
- Department of Movement and Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK and Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Paolo M Rossini
- Department of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele-Pisana, Roma, Italy
| | - Emiliano Santarnecchi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mouhsin M Shafi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Yoshikatzu Ugawa
- Department of Human Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Eric M Wassermann
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Abraham Zangen
- Zlotowski Center of Neuroscience, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mark Hallett
- Human Motor Control Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|