Disulfiram attenuates morphine or methadone withdrawal syndrome in mice

Postoperative opioid-free analgesia in dogs undergoing tibial plateau leveling osteotomy: a feasibility study

Objectives

This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the feasibility of an opioid-free anesthesia protocol and describe the quality of recovery and management of postoperative analgesia in dogs after a tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO).

Methods

In total, 20 dogs presented for TPLO were included. After premedication with intravenous (IV) medetomidine (0.005-0.007 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg), the dogs were anesthetized using ketamine (2 mg/kg) and propofol and maintained with isoflurane and ketamine CRI (0.6 mg/kg/h). Sciatic and femoral nerve blocks were performed with bupivacaine 0.5% (0.087 +/- 0.01 and 0.09 +/- 0.02 mL/kg, respectively). Meloxicam (0.2 mg/kg IV) was administered intraoperatively, after osteotomy. Fentanyl (0.002 mg/kg IV) was administered intraoperatively, as rescue analgesia in the case of sustained increase in cardiorespiratory variables. Two pain scores (French 4A-VET and Glasgow short form) were performed at conscious sternal recumbency and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 20 h after extubation and compared to baseline using a Friedman test followed by a Nemenyi post-hoc test. The time taken for the first food intake and urination was reported.

Results

Intraoperative opioid-free anesthesia was feasible in 11 dogs, whereas 9 dogs received fentanyl once during arthrotomy. No opioid postoperative rescue analgesia was required. Food intake occurred within 6 h, and all dogs were discharged after 24 h without any complication.

Conclusion

Total opioid-free postoperative analgesia was achieved in all dogs, with adequate recoveries. Although opioid-free anesthesia was feasible in 55% of the population, a single dose of fentanyl was necessary in 45% of the dogs during arthrotomy.

Nitric oxide modulates tapentadol antinociceptive tolerance and physical dependence

Tapentadol, an analgesic with a dual mechanism of action, involving both μ-opioid receptor agonism and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition (MOP-NRI), was designed for the treatment of moderate to severe pain. However, the widely acknowledged risk of analgesic tolerance and development of physical dependence following sustained opioid use may hinder their effectiveness. One of the possible mechanisms behind these phenomena are alterations in nitric oxide synthase (NOS) system activity. The aim of the study was to investigate the tolerance and dependence potential of tapentadol in rodent models and to evaluate the possible role of nitric oxide (NO) in these processes. Our study showed that chronic tapentadol treatment resulted in tolerance to its antinociceptive effects to an extent similar to tramadol, but much less than morphine. A single injection of a non-selective NOS inhibitor, NG-nitro-L-arginine (L-NOArg), reversed the tapentadol tolerance. In dependence studies, repeated administration of L-NOArg attenuated naloxone-precipitated withdrawal in tapentadol-treated mice, whereas a single injection of L-NOArg was ineffective. Biochemical analysis revealed that tapentadol decreased nNOS protein levels in the dorsal root ganglia of rats following 31 days of treatment, while no significant changes were found in iNOS and eNOS protein expression. Moreover, pre-treatment with L-NOArg augmented tapentadol antinociception in an opioid- and α2-adrenoceptor-dependent manner. In conclusion, our data suggest that the NOS system plays an important role in the attenuation of tapentadol-induced tolerance and withdrawal. Thus, inhibition of NOS activity can serve as a promising treatment option for long-term tapentadol use by extending its effectiveness and improving the side-effects profile.

Advantages and disadvantages of disulfiram coadministered with popular addictive substances

Disulfiram (DSF) is a well-known anti-alcohol agent that inhibits aldehyde dehydrogenase and results in extreme 'hangover' symptoms when consumed with alcohol. This drug, however, has been suggested as useful in other forms of drug addiction due to its beneficial potential in both drug abuse reduction and withdrawal. However, among other drugs used in alcohol dependence, it carries the greatest risk of pharmacological interactions. Concomitant use of DSF and central nervous system stimulants usually leads to harmful, undesirable effects. To date, there is still limited data regarding the detailed safety profile of DSF as a concomitant drug. In this review article, we outline the current state of knowledge about DSF, its broad pharmacological action, as well as therapeutic effects, with a particular emphasis on the molecular understanding of its potential pharmacodynamic interactions with common addictive substances (e.g., alcohol, cocaine, cannabinoids, opioids) supported by relevant examples.

Disulfiram Abrogates Morphine Tolerance-A Possible Role of µ-Opioid Receptor-Related G-Protein Activation in the Striatum

One of the key strategies for effective pain management involves delaying analgesic tolerance. Early clinical reports indicate an extraordinary effectiveness of off-label disulfiram-an agent designed for alcohol use disorder-in potentiating opioid analgesia and abrogation of tolerance. Our study aimed to determine whether sustained µ-opioid signaling upon disulfiram exposure contributes to these phenomena. Wistar rats were exposed to acute and chronic disulfiram and morphine cotreatment. Nociceptive thresholds were assessed with the mechanical Randal-Selitto and thermal tail-flick tests. µ-opioid receptor activation in brain structures important for pain processing was carried out with the [35S]GTPγS assay. The results suggest that disulfiram (12.5-50 mg/kg i.g.) augmented morphine antinociception and diminished morphine (25 mg/kg, i.g.) tolerance in a supraspinal, opioid-dependent manner. Disulfiram (25 mg/kg, i.g.) induced a transient enhancement of µ-opioid receptor activation in the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM), hypothalamus, prefrontal cortex and the dorsal striatum at day 1 of morphine treatment. Disulfiram rescued µ-opioid receptor signaling in the nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen 14 days following morphine and disulfiram cotreatment. The results of this study suggest that striatal µ-opioid receptors may contribute to the abolition of morphine tolerance following concomitant treatment with disulfiram.

The Positive and Negative Outcome of Morphine and Disulfiram Subacute Co-Administration in Rats in the Absence of Ethanol Challenge

Recently, a well-known anti-alcohol agent, disulfiram (DSF), has gain much interest, as it was found to be effective in the treatment of cocaine abusers, thus also giving hope for patients addicted to opioids and other illicit drugs. Therefore, this study was aimed to investigate the possible outcome that might occur within the subacute co-administration of both morphine (MRF) and DSF in rats, but in the absence of ethanol challenge. As observed, intraperitoneal DSF dose-dependently enhanced MRF-mediated analgesia with the maximal efficacy at a dose of 100 mg/kg. Furthermore, MRF-induced tolerance and aggressive behavior were significantly reduced by DSF (100 mg/kg, i.p.) in comparison to MRF solely. Nonetheless, significant blood biochemical markers of hepatotoxicity were found (i.e., alteration in the levels of glutathione, blood urea nitrogen, etc.), following a combination of both drugs. Likewise, histological analysis of liver tissue revealed severe changes in the group of DSF + MRF, which includes swelling, cell death, damage to certain vessels, and hemorrhages into the liver parenchyma. Our findings indicate that DSF should be used with extreme caution, especially within the course of subacute concomitant use with MRF, as several possible side effects may take place.

Endogenous Opiates and Behavior: 2018

This paper is the forty-first consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2018 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonists and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (2), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (3) and humans (4), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (5), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (6), stress and social status (7), learning and memory (8), eating and drinking (9), drug abuse and alcohol (10), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (11), mental illness and mood (12), seizures and neurologic disorders (13), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (14), general activity and locomotion (15), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (16), cardiovascular responses (17), respiration and thermoregulation (18), and immunological responses (19).