Childhood Asthma Disparities in Chicago: Developing Approaches to Health Inequities

Stock Inhalers: A Qualitative Data Analysis of Illinois Health Policy Trials and Triumphs

BACKGROUND

Asthma reliever medication access is critical, especially in schools. Policies that "stock" reliever inhalers in schools provide failsafe medication access. This research aims to understand barriers and facilitators to Illinois stock inhaler policy implementation.

METHODS

We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews in 2021-2022 with key school-based and non-school-based partners (school administrators, nurses, governmental agencies, and advocacy leaders). Through Atlas.ti, code frequencies compared (Fisher's exact test), and a thematic analysis performed.

RESULTS

Four themes emerged: facilitators, barriers, program rationale, and process considerations. The common facilitators were "Finding a provider," having a "Champion," and "Funding". Barriers included "Not enough school nurses," "Pharmacy refusal to fill prescriptions," and "Feeling overwhelmed." All were supportive of the rationale for stock inhalers. Non-school-based informants (p < .01) were more likely to mention medication donations, while school staff reported having enough nurses as a facilitator (p < .01). School staff reported concerns about children with asthma not having their medication significantly more than other partners (p = .02).

IMPLICATIONS FOR SCHOOL HEALTH POLICY, PRACTICE, AND EQUITY

Our analysis revealed that school partners recognize the value of stock inhalers. Barrier mitigation to support the funding, prescription access and processing, and training are essential to success of stock inhaler programming. Multilevel collaborative efforts through coalitions could be a potential solution.

Ensuring equitable access to guideline-based asthma care across the lifespan: Tips and future directions to the successful implementation of the new NAEPP 2020 guidelines, a Work Group Report of the AAAAI Asthma, Cough, Diagnosis, and Treatment Committee

The most recent recommendations from the 2020 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Update and Global Initiative for Asthma 2021 guide evidence-based clinical decision making. However, given the present state of health disparities by age, income, and race, the equitable implementation and dissemination of these guidelines will be unlikely without further guidance. This work group report reviews the current state of the new asthma guideline implementation; presents updated evidence-based therapeutic options with attention to specific patient populations; and addresses barriers to the implementation of these guidelines in minoritized, historically marginalized, and underresourced communities. Allergists and immunologists can use practical ways to accomplish the goals of improved asthma care access and advanced asthma care across the life span, with specific considerations to historically marginalized populations. Modifiable barriers to guideline implementation include financial barriers, environmental factors, and allergy subspecialty access and care coordination. Various programs to improve access to guideline-based asthma care include community programs, school-based asthma programs, and digital health solutions, with an emphasis on reducing disparities by race.

Improving Adherence in Urban Youth With Asthma: Role of Community Health Workers

BACKGROUND

The Asthma Action at Erie Trial is a comparative effectiveness trial comparing a community health worker (CHW) versus certified asthma educator (AE-C) intervention in low-income minority children.

OBJECTIVES

Determine whether asthma medication possession, adherence, technique, and triggers differ in children receiving an asthma CHW compared with an AE-C intervention.

METHODS

Children with uncontrolled asthma were randomized to receive 10 CHW home visits or 2 AE-C sessions in a clinic over 1 year. Asthma medication possession and inhaler technique were observed; adherence was measured using self-report, dose counters, and electronic monitors. Environmental triggers were captured by self-report, observation, and objective measurement. Mixed effects linear and logistic regression models were estimated for continuous and binary outcomes.

RESULTS

Children (n = 223) were mainly Hispanic (85%) and ages 5 to 16 years. Quick-relievers (82%), spacers (72%), and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)-containing medications (44%) were tracked. Of those with uncontrolled asthma, 35% lacked an ICS prescription (n = 201). Children in the CHW arm were more likely to have an ICS prescription at 12 months (odds ratio 2.39; 95% CI 0.99-5.79). Inhaler technique improved 9.8% in the CHW arm at 6 months (95% CI 4.20-15.32). The ICS adherence improved in the CHW arm at 12 months, with a 16.0% (95% CI 2.3-29.7; P = .02) difference between arms. Differences in trigger exposure over time were not observed between arms.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHW services were associated with improved ICS adherence and inhaler technique, compared with AE-C services. More information is needed to determine the necessary dosage of intervention to sustain adherence.

CHECK: Multi-level Real-World Pediatric Asthma Care Coordination: Results and Lessons Learned

OBJECTIVE

Because asthma health disparities in children remain common, innovative approaches to obtain asthma health equity are essential. Comprehensive care coordination programs may address the social determinants of health that influence these disparities. This analysis aims to ascertain if receipt of Coordination of Healthcare for Complex Kids (CHECK) program services was associated with changes in school absence, cost, healthcare utilization, and controller prescription in children with asthma.

METHODS

The CHECK program ran from December 1^st, 2014 through August 31^st, 2017. Engagement with Community Health Workers (CHW) was rolling and targeted based on risk level (low, medium or high determined by healthcare utilization). This analysis included school-aged children with asthma (n = 2,629) and sufficient Chicago Public Schools attendance data (n = 430).

RESULTS

Children engaged in CHECK were more likely to be female (p = 0.046) and to identify as Black and/or Hispanic/Latino than enrolled-only children. School absence was not different between the groups. Average total cost for engaged children was 21.3% more than enrolled-only children the first year (p = 0.027) but did not differ by the second year (p = 0.948). At baseline, 68.1% of the cohort had at least one ED visit 12-months prior to CHECK, this reduced to 49.5% post-1 and 41.9% post-2. Engaged children were 21% more likely to visit an ED (p = 0.010) and 40% more likely to have a controller.

CONCLUSIONS

CHECK program receipt was associated with reduced costs and improved healthcare utilization, and controller prescriptions. School attendance did not change. The CHECK model offers potential pathways to support low-income children with asthma.

Social Determinants of Health in Asthma Through the Life Course

There is strong evidence supporting the influence of social determinants of health (SDOH) on the development and progression of asthma. SDOH are defined as conditions in which people are born, grow up, live, work, and age, which influence their opportunity to be healthy, risk of illness, and life expectancy. The goal of this article was to describe 2 case-based approaches (pediatric and adult) to assessing and addressing SDOH in asthma across the life course and in community settings. As asthma providers and specialists, the role of SDOH is complex in our clinical care; however, it is critical to address social needs identified through clinical care for our patients with asthma. Clinical-community partnerships, through grant and cost-sharing mechanisms with resource agencies, are necessary to ameliorate social needs for patients and their communities and have the potential to improve asthma outcomes. Although this is a unique and exciting time in health care to promote individual and population health, knowledge gaps remain, including best practices to integrate holistic SDOH care into the care of patients with asthma.

Community Health Worker Asthma Interventions for Children: Results From a Clinically Integrated Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial (2016‒2019)

Objectives. To compare asthma control for children receiving either community health worker (CHW) or certified asthma educator (AE-C) services. Methods. The Asthma Action at Erie Trial is a comparative effectiveness trial that ran from 2016 to 2019 in Cook County, Illinois. Participants (aged 5‒16 years with uncontrolled asthma) were randomized to 10 home visits from clinically integrated asthma CHWs or 2 in-clinic sessions from an AE-C. Results. Participants (n = 223) were mainly Hispanic (85%) and low-income. Both intervention groups showed significant improvement in asthma control scores over time. Asthma control was maintained after interventions ended. The CHW group experienced a greater improvement in asthma control scores. One year after intervention cessation, the CHW group had a 42% reduction in days of activity limitation relative to the AE-C group (b = 0.58; 95% confidence interval = 0.35, 0.96). Conclusions. Both interventions were associated with meaningful improvements in asthma control. Improvements continued for 1 year after intervention cessation and were stronger with the CHW intervention. Public Health Implications. Clinically integrated asthma CHW and AE-C services that do not provide home environmental remediation equipment may improve and sustain asthma control.

Implementation Lessons From a Randomized Trial Integrating Community Asthma Education for Children

This study characterized and compared the implementation of clinically integrated community health workers (CHWs) to a certified asthma educator (AE-C) for low-income children with asthma. In the AE-C arm (N = 115), 51.3% completed at least one in-clinic education session. In the CHW arm (N = 108), 722 home visits were completed. The median number of visits was 7 (range, 0-17). Scheduled in-clinic asthma education may not be the optimal intervention for this patient population. CHW visit completion rates suggest that the schedule, location, and content of CHW asthma services better met patients' needs. Seven to 10 visits seemed to be the preferred CHW dose.

Chicago Public School nurses examine barriers to school asthma care coordination

OBJECTIVE/DESIGN

Well documented asthma disparities in Chicago pose a continual challenge for the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). Coordinated Healthcare for Complex Kids (CHECK) is a health care demonstration project funded by a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Health Care Innovation Award. A collaborative partnership was formed between CHECK and CPS. With CHECK support, CPS administered a survey to 160 nurses to understand the asthma problems nurses perceived and interest in intervention.

RESULTS

Seventy-five per cent (n = 120) completed the survey. While asthma was the top diagnosis managed by 95%, 72% reported gaps in asthma understanding. Appropriate communication between school nurses and providers occurred 33% of the time; 18% believed they received sufficient support to follow-up on deficient paperwork. The barriers mentioned were lack of medications (73%), time (67%), and communication with providers (61%). When asked their opinions on potential interventions, 78% of nurses supported web-based applications, 66% community health workers (CHW), and 66% stock albuterol in schools.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest barriers for CPS nurses with asthma management are time and communication. Potential interventions such as web-based communication applications and CHW in schools were well received.