Risks Versus Benefits of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Cirrhotic Patients

Safety of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh Class C cirrhosis and atrial fibrillation

Background

Anticoagulation (AC) is used for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are safe in patients with AF without cirrhosis, they are hardly studied in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Our study evaluates the safety and outcomes of DOACs in patients with Child-Pugh class C cirrhosis (CPC).

Methods

We queried TriNetX Database. Patients with CPC and AF were divided into three cohorts: patients on DOACs, no AC, and warfarin. Three study arms were created using a 1:1 propensity score matching system (PSM).

Results

Totally 16 029 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 20.2% (n = 3235) were on DOACs, 47.1% (n = 7552) were not on AC, and 32.7% (n = 5242) were on warfarin. First arm comparing AC versus no AC, a statistically significant benefit was identified in 3-year mortality risk (47% vs 71%, P < 0.0001) and transplant status (17% vs 5%, p < 0.0001) with AC. However, no significant difference was identified regarding intracranial hemorrhage and GI bleeding risk. Second arm comparing patients on DOACs versus no AC, we identified mortality benefit (40% vs 72%, P < 0.0001) and a higher transplant rate (9% vs 3.2%, P < 0.0001) with DOACs. Intracranial hemorrhage rates (6% vs 4%, P = 0.03) were higher in patients on DOACs. Third arm comparing patients on DOACs versus Warfarin, a statistically significant lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage (6.6% vs 8.7%, P = 0.004) and GI bleed (2% vs 2.4%, P < 0.0001) were identified in patients on DOACs.

Conclusion

Anticoagulation is safe in patients with CPC with AF and may provide a mortality benefit. DOACs are a safer alternative to warfarin.

Assessing Safety of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Real-World Outcomes Study

AIMS

In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke risk factors, randomized trials have demonstrated that anticoagulation decreases the risk of ischemic stroke. However, all trials to date have excluded patients with significant liver disease, leaving guidelines to extrapolate recommendations. We aim to evaluate the impact of anticoagulation on safety events in patients with AF and cirrhosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, we obtained de-identified health record data to extract anticoagulation strategy, comorbidities, prescriptions, lab values, and procedures for a cohort of patients with cirrhosis who develop AF. After selecting a propensity matched population to match patients with various anticoagulation strategies, we tracked data on outcomes for death, transfusion requirements, hospital and ICU admissions. After propensity score weighting and multivariable adjustment, anticoagulation strategy was associated with increased hospital admission count (OR = 1.74 per admission, P < .001), binary risk of hospital admission (OR = 1.54, P = .010) and risk of ICU admission (OR = 1.41, P = .047). We detected no significant differences in mortality, transfusion of blood products, or average length of stay. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescriptions were associated with increased binary risk of hospital admission compared to warfarin prescriptions. In a third comparison, DOAC strategy alone was associated with increased hospital admission count (OR = 1.41 per admission, P < .001) and binary risk of hospital admission (OR = 1.52, P = .038) compared to no anticoagulation strategy.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation strategy in patients with cirrhosis and AF was associated with increased rate of hospital admission and ICU admission but not associated with increased risk of mortality or transfusion requirement.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Cirrhotic Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Update of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Prevention of ischemic stroke is an essential part of managing atrial fibrillation (AF). In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Little is understood regarding the efficacy and safety of DOACs in AF patients with liver cirrhosis (LC).

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis is designed to evaluate the benefits and risks of DOACs compared to VKAs in AF patients with concomitant LC.

METHODS

A thorough search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and CNKI databases up to February 2023. A total of seven clinical studies including 7551 patients were analyzed in this meta-analysis. All data analyses were performed using Review Manager software version 5.3.

RESULTS

Regarding efficacy outcomes, DOACs had comparable clinical benefit in reducing ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism (HR=0.79, 95% CI [0.59, 1.06], p = 0.12) to VKAs. The incidence of all-cause death was similar between the DOACs and VKAs group (HR 0.94, 95% CI [0.69, 1.28], p = 0.69). Regarding safety outcomes, DOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (HR 0.61, 95% CI [0.50, 0.75], p < 0.00001), intracranial hemorrhage (HR 0.55, 95% CI [0.31, 0.98], p = 0.04) and major gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.66, 95% CI [0.51, 0.85], p = 0.001) than VKAs. Additional subgroup analysis of advanced cirrhosis revealed that DOACs were associated with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding (HR 0.59, 95% CI [0.39, 0.89], p = 0.01) than VKAs. There were no significant differences between the DOACs and VKAs group concerning the incidence of ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism (HR 1.38, 95% CI [0.75, 2.55], p = 0.31) and major gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.65, 95% CI [0.41, 1.04], p = 0.08).

CONCLUSION

DOACs are associated with more favorable safety outcomes and may be a feasible option of oral anticoagulant for individuals with atrial fibrillation and cirrhosis. Pending validation by randomized prospective studies, the findings of this study should be interpreted with caution.

Anticoagulation in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: Friend or Foe?

Concepts regarding the status of the coagulation process in cirrhosis are rapidly changing. Instead of a disease defined by excessive bleeding risk, recent studies have shown cirrhosis to be associated with a fragile state of rebalanced hemostasis, easily swayed in either direction, thrombosis, or bleeding. These findings, combined with the ever-growing population of patients with cirrhosis with an indication for anticoagulation (AC) and the emergence of the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease epidemic, have prompted a reexamination of the use of AC in patients with cirrhosis, either as a treatment for a concurrent thrombotic disorder or even as a possible therapeutic option that could influence the natural course of the disease and its complications. In recent years, a significant number of studies have been formulated to evaluate these possibilities. These studies evaluated, among others, the efficacy and safety of AC in thrombotic disorders or thrombotic complications of cirrhosis, its effect on survival, and the class of anticoagulants which is more suitable for patients with cirrhosis, depending on disease severity. This review examines recent studies investigating the use of AC in patients with cirrhosis and attempts to provide a simple guide for clinicians regarding the use of AC in patients with cirrhosis and its potential risks and benefits.

Review article: the safety of anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents in patients with cirrhosis

Patients with cirrhosis were long thought to be coagulopathic. However, this paradigm has changed in recent years and currently, cirrhosis is recognised as a prothrombotic state. Due to the increasing incidence of cirrhosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis which is closely associated with cardiac disease, patients with cirrhosis increasingly require therapy with anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents. However, their potential for causing catastrophic and life-threatening bleeding in patients with cirrhosis leads to hesitancy about their use in patients with cirrhosis. Overall, traditional anticoagulation is safe for all Child-Pugh classes while newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are mostly safe in Child-Pugh class A/B and contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For different indications, published data to date suggest that anticoagulation is overall safe for patients with cirrhosis who have venous thromboembolism, atrial fibrillation and portal vein thrombosis, and does not increase the risk of variceal bleeding. Moreover, DOACs appear to have similar safety profiles as traditional anticoagulants. Finally, most studies suggest that antiplatelet agents are also safe to use in patients with cirrhosis although they are mostly contraindicated in severe hepatic impairment. For both anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, severe thrombocytopaenia presents a relative contraindication to their use. More prospective trials and large cohort studies are needed to advance our understanding of the safety and nuances of DOACs and antiplatelet agents in patients with advanced cirrhosis.

Antiplatelet Medications Are Associated With Bleeding and Decompensation Events Among Patients With Cirrhosis

BACKGROUND

In an aging population with cardiovascular comorbidities, anticoagulant (AC), antiplatelet (AP), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use are increasing. It remains unclear whether these agents pose increased bleeding risk in cirrhosis. This study aimed to assess the association between these medications and bleeding and portal hypertension complications in cirrhosis.

METHODS

The IMS PharMetrics database was used to identify privately insured adults diagnosed with cirrhosis from 2007 to 2015, stratified as compensated or decompensated based on the presence of portal hypertensive complications 1 year before cirrhosis diagnosis. Bleeding or decompensation outcomes were assessed 6 to 18 months after cirrhosis diagnosis using a landmark analysis design. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression modeling assessed associations between AC, AP, and NSAID drug exposures and outcomes adjusting for covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 18,070 cirrhosis patients were analyzed; 57% male; 74% ages 50 to 64 years; 34% with a prior decompensation. Overall, 377 (2%) had claims for ACs; 385 (2%) APs; and 1231 (7%) NSAIDs. APs were associated with increased bleeding [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00, 1.72] and decompensation events (aHR=1.44; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.95) in a 9-month landmark analysis. NSAIDs were significantly associated with bleeding events (aHR=1.29; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.57) on 3-month landmark analysis. No statistically significant associations were seen between ACs and bleeding or decompensation outcomes in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

AP use was associated with increased bleeding and decompensation events among privately insured patients with cirrhosis. NSAID use was associated with significant early bleeding, but not decompensations. Lastly ACs were not associated with bleeding or decompensation outcomes.

Safety of direct oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin in cirrhotic patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with warfarin in patients with both nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and clinically confirmed liver cirrhosis (LC) has not been well studied. We compared the risk of a major bleeding event between DOAC and warfarin treatments in this patient population.

METHODS

A total of 238 cirrhotic patients with AF were retrospectively analyzed. The major bleeding event risk was compared between DOAC- and warfarin-treated groups. The median follow-up duration was 5.6 years.

RESULTS

Among the 238 study patients with LC and AF, 128 (53.8%) received DOACs and 110 (46.2%) received warfarin. The mean patient age was 68.8 years, and 78.2% were men. A major bleeding event occurred in 10 and 20 patients in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively, most commonly caused by gastrointestinal bleeding (70.0%). The cumulative risk of major bleeding did not differ between the groups by log-rank test (p = 0.12). This finding did not change when using 60 propensity score-matched pairs. A multivariable Cox regression model indicated that the concomitant use of antiplatelet agents (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 4.30; p = 0.048) and presence of esophageal or gastric varices confirmed by endoscopic examination (aHR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.03 to 5.17; p = 0.04) were associated with major bleeding in the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

A major bleeding event risk is not increased by DOAC compared with warfarin treatment. Antiplatelet agent use and varices are independently associated with a higher risk of major bleeding during anticoagulation.

Atrial fibrillation, liver cirrhosis, thrombosis, and bleeding: A Danish population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

We examined the impact of liver cirrhosis on the risk of thromboembolic events and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AFF).

METHODS

This population-based cohort study used data from Danish health registries. We identified all patients with a first-time diagnosis of AFF during 1995 to 2015, and followed them from their AFF diagnosis until the end of 2016. Patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of liver cirrhosis. We computed incidence rates per 1000 person-years and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on Cox regression analyses, adjusting for age, CHA2DS2VASc score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score.

RESULTS

We identified 273 225 patients with AFF. Of these, 1463 (0.54%) had liver cirrhosis. During 0 to 5 years of follow-up, compared to patients without liver cirrhosis, patients with liver cirrhosis had higher incidence rates and hazards of ischemic stroke (29.7 vs 21.6; HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6), venous thromboembolism (9.2 vs 5.5; HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3), but not myocardial infarction (10.2 vs 11.2; HR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.7-1.2). Patients with liver cirrhosis also had higher rates of hemorrhagic stroke (5.8 vs 3.3; HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6), subdural hemorrhage (5.3 vs 1.6; HR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.1-4.9), hemorrhage of the lung or urinary tract (24.6 vs 15.2; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0), and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (34.5 vs 10.4; HR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.7-3.9).

CONCLUSION

In patients with AFF, liver cirrhosis was associated with an elevated risk of ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and all evaluated bleeding complications.

An informatics consult approach for generating clinical evidence for treatment decisions

BACKGROUND

An Informatics Consult has been proposed in which clinicians request novel evidence from large scale health data resources, tailored to the treatment of a specific patient. However, the availability of such consultations is lacking. We seek to provide an Informatics Consult for a situation where a treatment indication and contraindication coexist in the same patient, i.e., anti-coagulation use for stroke prevention in a patient with both atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

We examined four sources of evidence for the effect of warfarin on stroke risk or all-cause mortality from: (1) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), (2) meta-analysis of prior observational studies, (3) trial emulation (using population electronic health records (N = 3,854,710) and (4) genetic evidence (Mendelian randomisation). We developed prototype forms to request an Informatics Consult and return of results in electronic health record systems.

RESULTS

We found 0 RCT reports and 0 trials recruiting for patients with AF and cirrhosis. We found broad concordance across the three new sources of evidence we generated. Meta-analysis of prior observational studies showed that warfarin use was associated with lower stroke risk (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71, CI 0.39-1.29). In a target trial emulation, warfarin was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR = 0.61, CI 0.49-0.76) and ischaemic stroke (HR = 0.27, CI 0.08-0.91). Mendelian randomisation served as a drug target validation where we found that lower levels of vitamin K1 (warfarin is a vitamin K1 antagonist) are associated with lower stroke risk. A pilot survey with an independent sample of 34 clinicians revealed that 85% of clinicians found information on prognosis useful and that 79% thought that they should have access to the Informatics Consult as a service within their healthcare systems. We identified candidate steps for automation to scale evidence generation and to accelerate the return of results.

CONCLUSION

We performed a proof-of-concept Informatics Consult for evidence generation, which may inform treatment decisions in situations where there is dearth of randomised trials. Patients are surprised to know that their clinicians are currently not able to learn in clinic from data on 'patients like me'. We identify the key challenges in offering such an Informatics Consult as a service.

Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation and liver disease: a pooled-analysis of > 20000 patients

AIMS

Anticoagulation for atrial-fibrillation (AF) patients with liver-disease represents a clinical dilemma. We sought to evaluate the efficacy/safety of different anticoagulation, i.e. vitamin-K-antagonist (VKA) and non-VKA oral-anticoagulants (NOACs) in such patient group.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a pooled-analysis enrolling up-to-date clinical data. Two subsets: subset A (VKA vs. Non-Anticoagulation) and subset B (NOACs vs. VKA) were pre-specified. The study outcomes were ischemic-stroke(IS)/thromboembolism(TE), major-bleeding (MB), intracranial-bleeding (ICB), gastrointestinal-bleeding (GIB) and all-cause mortality.A total of 20,042 patients' data were analyzed (subset A: N = 10275, subset B: N = 9767). Overall mean age: 71±11 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score: 4.0±1.8, mean HAS-BLED score: 3.6±1.2. The majority of the patients had Child-Pugh category (A-B). As compared with Non-Anticoagulation, VKA seemed to reduce the risk of IS/TE (OR: 0.60, P = 0.05), but heighten the risk of all-bleeding-events including MB (OR: 2.81, P = 0.01), ICB (OR: 1.60, P = 0.01), and GIB (OR: 3.32, P = 0.01). When compared with VKA, NOACs had similar efficacy in reducing the risk of IS/TE (OR: 0.82, P = 0.64), significantly lower risk of MB (OR: 0.54, P = 0.0003) and ICB (OR: 0.35, P < 0.0001), and trend towards reduced risk of GIB (OR: 0.72, P = 0.12) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.79, P = 0.35). The favorable effects were maintained in subgroups of individual NOAC.

CONCLUSIONS

VKA appears to reduce the risk of IS/TE but increase all-bleeding-events. NOACs have similar effect in reducing the risk of IS/TE and have significantly lower risk of MB and ICB as compared with VKA. NOACs seem to be associated with better clinical outcome than VKA in patients with mild-moderate liver disease.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

The Spectrum of Disease Severity in Cirrhosis and Its Implications for Hemostasis

Bleeding and thrombosis are both common complications that patients with advanced liver disease experience. While hemostatic pathways remain largely intact with cirrhosis, this balance can quickly shift in the direction of bleeding or clotting in an unpredictable manner. A growing body of literature is attempting to shed light on difficult scenarios that clinicians often face, ranging from predicting and mitigating bleeding risk in those who need invasive procedures to determining the best strategies to manage both bleeding and thrombotic complications when they occur. Studies examining hemostasis in those with advanced liver disease, however, often include heterogeneous cohorts with varied methodology. While these studies often select a cohort of all types and degrees of cirrhosis, emerging evidence suggests significant differences in underlying systemic inflammation and hemostatic abnormalities among specific phenotypes of liver disease, ranging from compensated cirrhosis to decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure. It is paramount that future studies account for these differing disease severities if we hope to address the many critical knowledge gaps in this field.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Liver Disease in the Era of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Global Epidemic: A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are highly prevalent and relevant healthcare issues. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now the first-choice for anticoagulant treatment of these conditions displaying a better efficacy/safety profile than vitamin-K antagonists, mainly due to significantly reduced risk of major bleeding, especially of intracranial haemorrhage. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in developed countries showing a continuously growing prevalence. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), its evolutive form, will be the leading cause for liver transplantation by 2020. NAFLD is independently associated with an increased risk of abnormalities of cardiac structure and function, including cardiac rhythm disorders (mainly AF). Moreover, data suggest an increased risk of unprovoked VTE associated with NAFLD/NASH. Therefore, a growing number of patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) will be candidate for anticoagulant therapy in the near future. Cirrhosis of any etiology is characterized by an unstable thrombosis/bleeding haemostatic balance, making anticoagulant therapy particularly challenging in this condition. Given that patients with significant active liver disease and cirrhosis were excluded from all pivotal randomized controlled trials on DOACs, this comprehensive review aims at critically discussing real-world evidence, including the latest population studies, regarding the use of DOACs in patients with CLD/cirrhosis.

Risk of Stroke in Liver Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver cirrhosis can lead to abnormal coagulation, rendering patients at risk for bleeding but also thrombotic complications. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the epidemiology of stroke in liver cirrhosis and the potential association between them.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies were searched through the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Incidence and prevalence of unspecific stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke were pooled by using a random-effect model. Meta-regression analyses were employed to explore the sources of heterogeneity. As for the cohort studies, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were pooled to evaluate the association between liver cirrhosis and stroke.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies with 93,191 cirrhotic patients were included, of which 23 explored the incidence and 10 explored the prevalence. The pooled incidence of unspecific stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and ischemic stroke was 4.1%, 1.3%, 2.0%, and 3.7%, respectively. The pooled prevalence of unspecific and ischemic stroke was 9.0% and 2.6%, respectively. Heterogeneity among studies was significant in most of meta-analyses. Meta-regression analyses indicated that the sample size might explain the potential source of heterogeneity (P=0.018). Liver cirrhosis significantly increased the risk of subarachnoid (HR=2.36; 95% CI, 1.80-3.09; P=0.000) and intracranial hemorrhage (HR=1.48; 95% CI, 1.06-2.05; P=0.020), but not unspecific (HR=1.02; 95% CI, 0.49-2.14; P=0.960), ischemic (HR=0.79; 95% CI, 0.46-1.35; P=0.380), or hemorrhagic stroke (HR=1.88; 95% CI, 0.52-6.81; P=0.335).

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke is uncommon in cirrhotic patients. However, considering a positive relationship of liver cirrhosis with subarachnoid and intracranial hemorrhage, the prophylactic strategy may be selectively adopted in cirrhotic patients.

Controversies in anticoagulation therapy in patients with cirrhosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article aims to review the latest literature on prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation and the safety profile of anticoagulants in patients with cirrhosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

The understanding of hematological hemostasis is cirrhotic patients has changed drastically in recent years. Although in the past, cirrhotic patients were often considered to be 'auto-anticoagulated' and at higher risk of bleeding, recent studies have demonstrated that there may be a rebalance in procoagulation and anticoagulation factors in patients with cirrhosis. This, and clinical experience, suggest that cirrhotic patients are at risk of development of venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and ischemic strokes and as such, the best management approaches in these patients remains controversial. The bulk of the data suggest that patients with cirrhosis who are at risk for thrombotic or embolic complications should be anticoagulated. However, it is imperative that they be closely monitored.

SUMMARY

The medical literature on anticoagulation in patients with liver cirrhosis is conflicting and limited to small sample observational studies. However, most studies suggest that in patients with early stages of liver cirrhosis and no history of varices, anticoagulation appears to be well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The atrial fibrillation-related stroke is clearly prevented by anticoagulation treatment, however, management of anticoagulation for AF in patients with cirrhosis represents a challenge due to bleeding concerns. To address this issue, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was performed.

METHODS

A literature search for studies reporting the incidence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Database, from inception through July 2018.

RESULTS

7 cohort studies including 19,798 patients with AF and cirrhosis were identified. The use of anticoagulation (%) among included studies ranged from 8.3% to 53.9%. Anticoagulation use for AF in patients with cirrhosis was significantly associated with a reduced risk of stroke, with a pooled HR of 0.58 (95%CI: 0.35-0.96). When compared with no anticoagulation, the use of anticoagulation was not significantly associated with a higher risk of bleeding, with a pooled HR of 1.45 (95%CI: 0.96-2.17). Compared to warfarin, the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) was associated with a lower risk of bleeding among AF patients with cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that anticoagulation use for AF in patients with cirrhosis is associated with a reduced risk of stroke, without increasing significantly the risk of bleeding, when compared to those without anticoagulation.

Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation in patients with cirrhosis and clinical significance: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The epidemiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with cirrhosis and its clinical significance remain unclear. This study aimed (i) to investigate the pooled prevalence and/or incidence of AF in patients with cirrhosis and (ii) to assess the mortality risk of AF in patients with cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A literature search for studies that reported incidence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was carried out using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database from inception through July 2018. Pooled incidence with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using a random-effect model. The protocol for this meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; no. CRD42018102664).

RESULTS

Seven cohort studies including 385 866 patients with cirrhosis were identified. The pooled estimated prevalence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was 5.0% (95% CI: 2.8-8.6%). When studies that solely assessed patients undergoing transplant evaluation or on transplant waiting list were excluded, the pooled estimated prevalence of AF in patients with cirrhosis was 7.4% (95% CI: 3.5-15.2%). There was a significant association between AF and increased mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with a pooled odds ratio of 1.44 (95% CI: 1.36-1.53).

CONCLUSION

The overall estimated prevalence of AF among patients with cirrhosis is 5.0%. Our study demonstrates a statistically significant increased mortality risk in cirrhotic patients with AF.