1
|
Shugg T, Tillman EM, Breman AM, Hodge JC, McDonald CA, Ly RC, Rowe EJ, Osei W, Smith TB, Schwartz PH, Callaghan JT, Pratt VM, Lynch S, Eadon MT, Skaar TC. Development of a Multifaceted Program for Pharmacogenetics Adoption at an Academic Medical Center: Practical Considerations and Lessons Learned. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2024; 116:914-931. [PMID: 39169556 PMCID: PMC11452286 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
In 2019, Indiana University launched the Precision Health Initiative to enhance the institutional adoption of precision medicine, including pharmacogenetics (PGx) implementation, at university-affiliated practice sites across Indiana. The overarching goal of this PGx implementation program was to facilitate the sustainable adoption of genotype-guided prescribing into routine clinical care. To accomplish this goal, we pursued the following specific objectives: (i) to integrate PGx testing into existing healthcare system processes; (ii) to implement drug-gene pairs with high-level evidence and educate providers and pharmacists on established clinical management recommendations; (iii) to engage key stakeholders, including patients to optimize the return of results for PGx testing; (iv) to reduce health disparities through the targeted inclusion of underrepresented populations; (v) and to track third-party reimbursement. This tutorial details our multifaceted PGx implementation program, including descriptions of our interventions, the critical challenges faced, and the major program successes. By describing our experience, we aim to assist other clinical teams in achieving sustainable PGx implementation in their health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Shugg
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Emma M. Tillman
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Amy M. Breman
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jennelle C. Hodge
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Christine A. McDonald
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Reynold C. Ly
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Rowe
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Wilberforce Osei
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Tayler B. Smith
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Peter H. Schwartz
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - John T. Callaghan
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Victoria M. Pratt
- Division of Diagnostic Genomics, Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Sheryl Lynch
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michael T. Eadon
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Todd C. Skaar
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gan P, Hajis MIB, Yumna M, Haruman J, Matoha HK, Wahyudi DT, Silalahi S, Oktariani DR, Dela F, Annisa T, Pitaloka TDA, Adhiwijaya PK, Pauzi RY, Hertanto R, Kumaheri MA, Sani L, Irwanto A, Pradipta A, Chomchopbun K, Gonzalez-Porta M. Development and validation of a pharmacogenomics reporting workflow based on the illumina global screening array chip. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1349203. [PMID: 38529185 PMCID: PMC10961362 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1349203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Microarrays are a well-established and widely adopted technology capable of interrogating hundreds of thousands of loci across the human genome. Combined with imputation to cover common variants not included in the chip design, they offer a cost-effective solution for large-scale genetic studies. Beyond research applications, this technology can be applied for testing pharmacogenomics, nutrigenetics, and complex disease risk prediction. However, establishing clinical reporting workflows requires a thorough evaluation of the assay's performance, which is achieved through validation studies. In this study, we performed pre-clinical validation of a genetic testing workflow based on the Illumina Global Screening Array for 25 pharmacogenomic-related genes. Methods: To evaluate the accuracy of our workflow, we conducted multiple pre-clinical validation studies. Here, we present the results of accuracy and precision assessments, involving a total of 73 cell lines. These assessments encompass reference materials from the Genome-In-A-Bottle (GIAB), the Genetic Testing Reference Material Coordination Program (GeT-RM) projects, as well as additional samples from the 1000 Genomes project (1KGP). We conducted an accuracy assessment of genotype calls for target loci in each indication against established truth sets. Results: In our per-sample analysis, we observed a mean analytical sensitivity of 99.39% and specificity 99.98%. We further assessed the accuracy of star-allele calls by relying on established diplotypes in the GeT-RM catalogue or calls made based on 1KGP genotyping. On average, we detected a diplotype concordance rate of 96.47% across 14 pharmacogenomic-related genes with star allele-calls. Lastly, we evaluated the reproducibility of our findings across replicates and observed 99.48% diplotype and 100% phenotype inter-run concordance. Conclusion: Our comprehensive validation study demonstrates the robustness and reliability of the developed workflow, supporting its readiness for further development for applied testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Gan
- Nalagenetics Pte Ltd., Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Fitria Dela
- PT Genomik Solidaritas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Tazkia Annisa
- PT Genomik Solidaritas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ariel Pradipta
- PT Genomik Solidaritas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
- Department Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kanji CR, Mbavha BT, Masimirembwa C, Thelingwani RS. Analytical validation of GenoPharm a clinical genotyping open array panel of 46 pharmacogenes inclusive of variants unique to people of African ancestry. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292131. [PMID: 37788265 PMCID: PMC10547200 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic testing may be used to improve treatment outcomes and reduce the frequency of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Population specific, targeted pharmacogenetics (PGx) panel-based testing methods enable sensitive, accurate and economical implementation of precision medicine. We evaluated the analytical performance of the GenoPharm® custom open array platform which evaluates 120 SNPs across 46 pharmacogenes. Using commercially available reference samples (Coriell Biorepository) and in-house extracted DNA, we assessed accuracy, precision, and linearity of GenoPharm®. We then used GenoPharm® on 218 samples from two Southern African black populations and determined allele and genotype frequencies for selected actionable variants. Across all assays, the GenoPharm® panel demonstrated 99.5% concordance with the Coriell reference samples, with 98.9% reproducibility. We observed high frequencies of key genetic variants in people of African ancestry: CYP2B6*6 (0.35), CYP2C9*8, *11 (0.13, 0.03), CYP2D6*17 (0.21) and *29 (0.11). GenoPharm® open array is therefore an accurate, reproducible and sensitive test that can be used for clinical pharmacogenetic testing and is inclusive of variants specific to the people of African ancestry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Comfort Ropafadzo Kanji
- Department of Genomic Medicine, African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (AiBST), Beatrice, Zimbabwe
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Zimbabwe (UZ), Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Bianza Tinotenda Mbavha
- Department of Genomic Medicine, African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (AiBST), Beatrice, Zimbabwe
| | - Collen Masimirembwa
- Department of Genomic Medicine, African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (AiBST), Beatrice, Zimbabwe
| | - Roslyn Stella Thelingwani
- Department of Genomic Medicine, African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (AiBST), Beatrice, Zimbabwe
- CradleOmics, Harare, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bai H, Zhang X, Bush WS. Pharmacogenomic and Statistical Analysis. Methods Mol Biol 2023; 2629:305-330. [PMID: 36929083 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2986-4_14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Genetic variants can alter response to drugs and other therapeutic interventions. The study of this phenomenon, called pharmacogenomics, is similar in many ways to other types of genetic studies but has distinct methodological and statistical considerations. Genetic variants involved in the processing of exogenous compounds exhibit great diversity and complexity, and the phenotypes studied in pharmacogenomics are also more complex than typical genetic studies. In this chapter, we review basic concepts in pharmacogenomic study designs, data generation techniques, statistical analysis approaches, and commonly used methods and briefly discuss the ultimate translation of findings to clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haimeng Bai
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Department of Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Xueyi Zhang
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - William S Bush
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Eadon MT, Maddatu J, Moe SM, Sinha AD, Melo Ferreira R, Miller BW, Sher SJ, Su J, Pratt VM, Chapman AB, Skaar TC, Moorthi RN. Pharmacogenomics of Hypertension in CKD: The CKD-PGX Study. KIDNEY360 2022; 3:307-316. [PMID: 35342886 PMCID: PMC8953763 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0005362021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Patients with CKD often have uncontrolled hypertension despite polypharmacy. Pharmacogenomic drug-gene interactions (DGIs) may affect the metabolism or efficacy of antihypertensive agents. We report changes in hypertension control after providing a panel of 11 pharmacogenomic predictors of antihypertensive response. Methods A prospective cohort with CKD and hypertension was followed to assess feasibility of pharmacogenomic testing implementation, self-reported provider utilization, and BP control. The analysis population included 382 subjects with hypertension who were genotyped for cross-sectional assessment of DGIs, and 335 subjects followed for 1 year to assess systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). Results Most participants (58%) with uncontrolled hypertension had a DGI reducing the efficacy of one or more antihypertensive agents. Subjects with a DGI had 1.85-fold (95% CI, 1.2- to 2.8-fold) higher odds of uncontrolled hypertension, as compared with those without a DGI, adjusted for race, health system (safety-net hospital versus other locations), and advanced CKD (eGFR <30 ml/min). CYP2C9-reduced metabolism genotypes were associated with losartan response and uncontrolled hypertension (odds ratio [OR], 5.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 14.7). CYP2D6-intermediate or -poor metabolizers had less frequent uncontrolled hypertension compared with normal metabolizers taking metoprolol or carvedilol (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.95). In 335 subjects completing 1-year follow-up, SBP (-4.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.5 mm Hg) and DBP (-3.3 mm Hg; 95% CI, 2.0 to 4.6 mm Hg) were improved. No significant difference in SBP or DBP change were found between individuals with and without a DGI. Conclusions There is a potential role for the addition of pharmacogenomic testing to optimize antihypertensive regimens in patients with CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T. Eadon
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Judith Maddatu
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Sharon M. Moe
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Arjun D. Sinha
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Ricardo Melo Ferreira
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Brent W. Miller
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - S. Jawad Sher
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Jing Su
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Victoria M. Pratt
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Todd C. Skaar
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Ranjani N. Moorthi
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tang NY, Pei X, George D, House L, Danahey K, Lipschultz E, Ratain MJ, O'Donnell PH, Yeo KTJ, van Wijk XMR. Validation of a Large Custom-Designed Pharmacogenomics Panel on an Array Genotyping Platform. J Appl Lab Med 2021; 6:1505-1516. [PMID: 34263311 DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfab056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomics has the potential to improve patient outcomes through predicting drug response. We designed and evaluated the analytical performance of a custom OpenArray® pharmacogenomics panel targeting 478 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). METHODS Forty Coriell Institute cell line (CCL) DNA samples and DNA isolated from 28 whole-blood samples were used for accuracy evaluation. Genotyping calls were compared to at least 1 reference method: next-generation sequencing, Sequenom MassARRAY®, or Sanger sequencing. For precision evaluation, 23 CCL samples were analyzed 3 times and reproducibility of the assays was assessed. For sensitivity evaluation, 6 CCL samples and 5 whole-blood DNA samples were analyzed at DNA concentrations of 10 ng/µL and 50 ng/µL, and their reproducibility and genotyping call rates were compared. RESULTS For 443 variants, all samples assayed had concordant calls with at least 1 reference genotype and also demonstrated reproducibility. However, 6 of these 443 variants showed an unsatisfactory performance, such as low PCR amplification or insufficient separation of genotypes in scatter plots. Call rates were comparable between 50 ng/µL DNA (99.6%) and 10 ng/µL (99.2%). Use of 10 ng/µL DNA resulted in an incorrect call for a single sample for a single variant. Thus, as recommended by the manufacturer, 50 ng/µL is the preferred concentration for patient genotyping. CONCLUSIONS We evaluated a custom-designed pharmacogenomics panel and found that it reliably interrogated 437 variants. Clinically actionable results from selected variants on this panel are currently used in clinical studies employing pharmacogenomics for clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nga Yeung Tang
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Technology Clinical Laboratory, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Xun Pei
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Technology Clinical Laboratory, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - David George
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Technology Clinical Laboratory, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Larry House
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Technology Clinical Laboratory, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Keith Danahey
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,Center for Research Informatics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Elizabeth Lipschultz
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,Center for Research Informatics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Mark J Ratain
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Peter H O'Donnell
- Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Kiang-Teck J Yeo
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Technology Clinical Laboratory, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Xander M R van Wijk
- Department of Pathology, Advanced Technology Clinical Laboratory, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.,Center for Personalized Therapeutics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Collins KS, Raviele ALJ, Elchynski AL, Woodcock AM, Zhao Y, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Eadon MT. Genotype-Guided Hydralazine Therapy. Am J Nephrol 2020; 51:764-776. [PMID: 32927458 DOI: 10.1159/000510433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its approval in 1953, hydralazine hydrochloride continues to be used in the management of resistant hypertension, a condition frequently managed by nephrologists and other clinicians. Hydralazine hydrochloride undergoes metabolism by the N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) enzyme. NAT2 is highly polymorphic as approximately 50% of the general population are slow acetylators. In this review, we first evaluate the link between NAT2 genotype and phenotype. We then assess the evidence available for genotype-guided therapy of hydralazine, specifically addressing associations of NAT2 acetylator status with hydralazine pharmacokinetics, antihypertensive efficacy, and toxicity. SUMMARY There is a critical need to use hydralazine in some patients with resistant hypertension. Available evidence supports a significant link between genotype and NAT2 enzyme activity as 29 studies were identified with an overall concordance between genotype and phenotype of 92%. The literature also supports an association between acetylator status and hydralazine concentration, as fourteen of fifteen identified studies revealed significant relationships with a consistent direction of effect. Although fewer studies are available to directly link acetylator status with hydralazine antihypertensive efficacy, the evidence from this smaller set of studies is significant in 7 of 9 studies identified. Finally, 5 studies were identified which support the association of acetylator status with hydralazine-induced lupus. Clinicians should maintain vigilance when prescribing maximum doses of hydralazine. Key Messages: NAT2 slow acetylator status predicts increased hydralazine levels, which may lead to increased efficacy and adverse effects. Caution should be exercised in slow acetylators with total daily hydralazine doses of 200 mg or more. Fast acetylators are at risk for inefficacy at lower doses of hydralazine. With appropriate guidance on the usage of NAT2 genotype, clinicians can adopt a personalized approach to hydralazine dosing and prescription, enabling more efficient and safe treatment of resistant hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly S Collins
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Anthony L J Raviele
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Amanda L Elchynski
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Alexander M Woodcock
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Yang Zhao
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Michael T Eadon
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spiech KM, Tripathy PR, Woodcock AM, Sheth NA, Collins KS, Kannegolla K, Sinha AD, Sharfuddin AA, Pratt VM, Khalid M, Hains DS, Moe SM, Skaar TC, Moorthi RN, Eadon MT. Implementation of a Renal Precision Medicine Program: Clinician Attitudes and Acceptance. Life (Basel) 2020; 10:life10040032. [PMID: 32224869 PMCID: PMC7235993 DOI: 10.3390/life10040032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A precision health initiative was implemented across a multi-hospital health system, wherein a panel of genetic variants was tested and utilized in the clinical care of chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Pharmacogenomic predictors of antihypertensive response and genomic predictors of CKD were provided to clinicians caring for nephrology patients. To assess clinician knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to act on genetic testing results, a Likert-scale survey was sent to and self-administered by these nephrology providers (N = 76). Most respondents agreed that utilizing pharmacogenomic-guided antihypertensive prescribing is valuable (4.0 ± 0.7 on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 indicates strong agreement). However, the respondents also expressed reluctance to use genetic testing for CKD risk stratification due to a perceived lack of supporting evidence (3.2 ± 0.9). Exploratory sub-group analyses associated this reluctance with negative responses to both knowledge and attitude discipline questions, thus suggesting reduced exposure to and comfort with genetic information. Given the evolving nature of genomic implementation in clinical care, further education is warranted to help overcome these perception barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M. Spiech
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Purnima R. Tripathy
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Alex M. Woodcock
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Nehal A. Sheth
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Kimberly S. Collins
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Karthik Kannegolla
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Arjun D. Sinha
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Asif A. Sharfuddin
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Victoria M. Pratt
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA;
| | - Myda Khalid
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (M.K.); (D.S.H.)
| | - David S. Hains
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (M.K.); (D.S.H.)
| | - Sharon M. Moe
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Todd C. Skaar
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Ranjani N. Moorthi
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
| | - Michael T. Eadon
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA; (K.M.S.); (P.R.T.); (A.M.W.); (N.A.S.); (K.S.C.); (K.K.); (A.D.S.); (A.A.S.); (S.M.M.); (T.C.S.); (R.N.M.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: 317-274-2502; Fax: 317-274-8575
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cordyceps militaris Improves Chronic Kidney Disease by Affecting TLR4/NF- κB Redox Signaling Pathway. OXIDATIVE MEDICINE AND CELLULAR LONGEVITY 2019; 2019:7850863. [PMID: 31049139 PMCID: PMC6462325 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7850863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Cordyceps militaris may show good promise in protecting against chronic kidney disease (CKD) but the molecular mechanism remains unclear. CKD risk is associated with the Toll-like receptor 4/nuclear factor-kappa B (TLR4/NF-κB) signaling pathway. Cordycepin is the main component of Cordyceps militaris and may affect the TLR4/NF-κB pathway. Cordycepin was prepared by preparative HPLC. CKD patients were assigned into Cordyceps militaris (COG, 100 mg daily) and placebo (CG) groups. Cordycepin activity was measured using human embryo kidney cells (HEK293T). Biochemical indices, the levels of TLR4, NF-κB, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β), were measured by real-time qRT-PCR, or ELISA kits and or Western blot. After 3-month treatment, cordycepin reduced the levels of urinal protein, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine by 36.7%±8.6%, 12.5%±3.2%, and 18.3%±6.6%, respectively (P < 0.05). Cordyceps militaris improved lipid profile and redox capacity of CKD patients by reducing the serum levels of TG, TC, and LDL-C by 12.8%±3.6%, 15.7%±4.1%, and 16.5%±4.4% and increasing the HDL-C level by 10.1%±1.4% in the COG group when compared with the CG group, respectively (P < 0.05). The serum levels of cystatin-C (Cys-C), myeloperoxidase (MPO), and malondialdehyde (MDA) were reduced by 14.0%±3.8%, 26.9%±12.3%, and 19.7%±7.9% while nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were increased by 12.5%±2.9% and 25.3%±13.4% in the COG group when compared with the CG group, respectively (P < 0.05). Cordycepin reduced the levels of TLR4, NF-κB, COX2, TNF-α, and IL-1β in HEK293T cells too (P < 0.05). However, cordycepin could not affect the levels anymore if TLR4 was silenced. Cordyceps militaris protected against CKD progression by affecting the TLR4/NF-κB lipid and redox signaling pathway via cordycepin.
Collapse
|