Trough concentration over 12.1 mg/L is a major risk factor of vancomycin-related nephrotoxicity in patients with therapeutic drug monitoring

Is It Still Beneficial to Monitor the Trough Concentration of Vancomycin? A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Nephrotoxicity and Efficacy

This study conducted a quantitative meta-analysis to investigate the association of vancomycin indicators, particularly area under the curve over 24 h (AUC24) and trough concentrations (Ctrough), and their relationship with both nephrotoxicity and efficacy. Literature research was performed in PubMed and Web of Science on vancomycin nephrotoxicity and efficacy in adult inpatients. Vancomycin Ctrough, AUC24, AUC24/minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), nephrotoxicity evaluation and treatment outcomes were extracted. Logistic regression and Emax models were conducted, stratified by evaluation criterion for nephrotoxicity and primary outcomes for efficacy. Among 100 publications on nephrotoxicity, 29 focused on AUC24 and 97 on Ctrough, while of 74 publications on efficacy, 27 reported AUC24/MIC and 68 reported Ctrough. The logistic regression analysis indicated a significant association between nephrotoxicity and vancomycin Ctrough (odds ratio = 2.193; 95% CI 1.582-3.442, p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic curve had an area of 0.90, with a cut-off point of 14.55 mg/L. Additionally, 92.3% of the groups with a mean AUC24 within 400-600 mg·h/L showed a mean Ctrough of 10-20 mg/L. However, a subtle, non-statistically significant association was observed between the AUC24 and nephrotoxicity, as well as between AUC24/MIC and Ctrough concerning treatment outcomes. Our findings suggest that monitoring vancomycin Ctrough remains a beneficial and valuable approach to proactively identifying patients at risk of nephrotoxicity, particularly when Ctrough exceeds 15 mg/L. Ctrough can serve as a surrogate for AUC24 to some extent. However, no definitive cut-off values were identified for AUC24 concerning nephrotoxicity or for Ctrough and AUC24/MIC regarding efficacy.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin Concentrations for the Management of Bone and Joint Infections: An Urgent Need

Vancomycin is used for the treatment of bone and joint infections (BJI), but scarce information is available about its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) characteristics. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with the non-achievement of an optimal PK/PD target in the first therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital from January 2020 to January 2022. Patients with BJI and TDM of vancomycin on day 2 of treatment were included. Initial vancomycin fixed doses (1 g every 8 h or 12 h) was decided by the responsible doctors. According to TDM results, dosage adjustments were performed. An AUC_24h/MIC < 400 mg × h/L, between 400 and 600 mg × h/L and >600 mg × h/L, were defined as suboptimal, optimal and supratherapeutic, respectively. Patients were grouped into these three categories. Demographic, clinical and PK characteristics were compared between groups. Nephrotoxicity at the end of treatment was assessed. Results: A total of 94 patients were included: 22 (23.4%), 42 (44.7%) and 30 (31.9%) presented an infratherapeutic, optimal and supratherapeutic PK/PD targets, respectively. A younger age and initial vancomycin dose <40 mg/kg/day were predictive factors for achieving a suboptimal PK/PD target, while older age, higher serum-creatinine and dose >40 mg/kg/day were associated with overexposure. The nephrotoxicity rate was 22.7%. More than 50% of patients did not achieve an optimal PK/PD. Considering age, baseline serum-creatinine and body weight, TDM is required to readily achieve an optimal and safe exposure.

A Brief Review of Pharmacokinetic Assessments of Vancomycin in Special Groups of Patients with Altered Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Vancomycin is considered the drug of choice against many Gram-positive bacterial infections. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is essential to achieve an optimum clinical response and avoid vancomycin-induced adverse reactions including nephrotoxicity. Although different studies are available on vancomycin TDM, still there are controversies regarding the selection among different pharmacokinetic parameters including trough concentration, the area under the curve to minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC24h/MIC), AUC of intervals, elimination constant, and vancomycin clearance. In this review, different pharmacokinetic parameters for vancomycin TDM have been discussed along with corresponding advantages and disadvantages. Also, vancomycin pharmacokinetic assessments are discussed in patients with altered pharmacokinetic parameters including those with renal and/or hepatic failure, critically ill patients, patients with burn injuries, intravenous drug users, obese and morbidly obese patients, those with cancer, patients undergoing organ transplantation, and vancomycin administration during pregnancy and lactation. An individualized dosing regimen is required to guarantee the optimum therapeutic responses and minimize adverse reactions including acute kidney injury in these special groups of patients. According to the pharmacoeconomic data on vancomycin TDM, pharmacokinetic assessments would be cost-effective in patients with altered pharmacokinetics and are associated with shorter hospitalization period, faster clinical stability status, and shorter courses of inpatient vancomycin administration.

Pharmacokinetic assessment of vancomycin in critically ill patients and nephrotoxicity prediction using individualized pharmacokinetic parameters

Introduction: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and pharmacokinetic assessments of vancomycin would be essential to avoid vancomycin-associated nephrotoxicity and obtain optimal therapeutic and clinical responses. Different pharmacokinetic parameters, including trough concentration and area under the curve (AUC), have been proposed to assess the safety and efficacy of vancomycin administration. Methods: Critically ill patients receiving vancomycin at Nemazee Hospital were included in this prospective study. Four blood samples at various time intervals were taken from each participated patient. Vancomycin was extracted from plasma samples and analyzed using a validated HPLC method. Results: Fifty-three critically ill patients with a total of 212 blood samples from June 2019 to June 2021 were included in this study. There was a significant correlation between baseline GFR, baseline serum creatinine, trough and peak concentrations, AUCτ, AUC24h, Cl, and Vd values with vancomycin-induced AKI. Based on trough concentration values, 66% of patients were under-dosed (trough concentration <15 μg/ml) and 18.9% were over-dosed (trough concentration ≥20 μg/ml). Also, based on AUC24h values, about 52.2% were under-dosed (AUC24h < 400 μg h/ml), and 21.7% were over-dosed (AUC24h > 600 μg h/ml) that emphasizes on the superiority of AUC-based monitoring approach for TDM purposes to avoid nephrotoxicity occurrence. Conclusion: The AUC-based monitoring approach would be superior in terms of nephrotoxicity prediction. Also, to avoid vancomycin-induced AKI, trough concentration and AUCτ values should be maintained below the cut-off points.

Clinical Response and Hospital Costs of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Vancomycin in Elderly Patients

Cost-effectiveness analysis has been widely used to assess and compare the costs and benefits of a clinical service. The cost-effectiveness of vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has not been studied in the elderly, who are susceptible to vancomycin-induced adverse effects. This study was performed to evaluate if vancomycin TDM is cost-effective in elderly patients in the Republic of Korea. Using the electronic medical records at a tertiary university hospital, we performed a retrospective observational study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vancomycin TDM in 850 elderly patients who underwent vancomycin TDM with an appropriate, recommended dosing regimen and 1094 elderly patients who did not. Cost-effectiveness variables such as clinical outcomes and medical expenses were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The TDM group spent significantly less than the non-TDM group per patient for total medical expenses (by USD 841.40) and medication expenses (by USD 16.70). However, no significant difference was noted between the TDM and non-TDM groups in clinical outcomes such as microbiological cure, prevention of nephrotoxicity, or reduced mortality, irrespective of admission to the intensive care unit. Vancomycin TDM in elderly patients was associated with economic benefits, but not with better clinical outcomes.

Tolerance and microbiological efficacy of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with vancomycin as empirical antimicrobial therapy of prosthetic joint infection: a propensity-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

The use of piperacillin/tazobactam with vancomycin as empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) has been associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), leading us to propose cefepime as an alternative since 2017 in our reference centre.

OBJECTIVES

To compare microbiological efficacy and tolerance of these two EAT strategies.

METHODS

All adult patients with PJI empirically treated with vancomycin+cefepime (n = 89) were enrolled in a prospective observational study and matched with vancomycin+piperacillin/tazobactam-treated historical controls (n = 89) according to a propensity score including age, baseline renal function and concomitant use of other nephrotoxic agents. The two groups were compared using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, and non-parametric tests regarding the proportion of efficacious empirical regimen and the incidence of empirical therapy-related adverse events (AE).

RESULTS

Among 146 (82.0%) documented infections, the EAT was considered efficacious in 77 (98.7%) and 65 (98.5%) of the piperacillin/tazobactam- and cefepime-treated patients, respectively (P = 1.000). The rate of AE, particularly AKI, was significantly higher in the vancomycin+piperacillin/tazobactam group [n = 27 (30.3%) for all AE and 23 (25.8%) for AKI] compared with the vancomycin+cefepime [n = 13 (14.6%) and 6 (6.7%)] group (P = 0.019 and <0.001, respectively), leading to premature EAT discontinuation in 20 (22.5%) and 5 (5.6%) patients (P = 0.002). The two groups were not significantly different regarding their comorbidities, and AKI incidence was not related to vancomycin plasma overexposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the susceptibility profile of bacterial isolates from included patients, microbiological efficacy of both strategies was expected to be similar, but vancomycin + cefepime was associated with a significantly lower incidence of AKI.

Relationship of vancomycin trough levels with acute kidney injury risk: an exposure–toxicity meta-analysis

Objectives

Nephrotoxicity represents a major complication of vancomycin administration, leading to high rates of morbidity and treatment failure. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between trough levels and risk of renal impairment, by defining an exposure–toxicity relationship and assessing its accuracy in predicting the development of acute kidney injury (AKI).

Methods

Medline, Scopus, CENTRAL, Clinicaltrials.gov and Google Scholar databases were systematically searched from inception. Studies examining the effects of trough levels on nephrotoxicity risk in adult patients were deemed eligible.

Results

The meta-analysis was based on 60 studies, including 13 304 patients. The development of AKI was significantly linked to both higher initial [standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.65–0.98] and maximum (SMD: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.82–1.29) trough levels. Dose–response analysis indicated a curvilinear relationship between trough levels and nephrotoxicity risk (χ2 = 127.1; P value &lt; 0.0001). A cut-off of 15 mg/L detected AKI with a sensitivity of 62.6% (95% CI: 55.6–69.2) and a specificity of 65.5% (95% CI: 58.9–71.6), while applying a 20 mg/L threshold resulted in a sensitivity of 42.9% (95% CI: 34–52.2) and a specificity of 82.5% (95% CI: 73.9–88.8).

Conclusions

The present findings suggest that the development of vancomycin-induced AKI is significantly associated with higher initial and maximum trough levels. An exposure–response relationship was defined, indicating that increasing trough levels correlate with a significant rise of nephrotoxicity risk. Future studies should verify the effectiveness of individualized pharmacokinetic tools that would enable the attainment of trough level targets and minimize the risk of renal toxicity.

Weight-based vancomycin loading strategy may not improve achievement of optimal vancomycin concentration in patients with preserved renal function

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate clinical effectiveness of vancomycin loading strategy and factors associated with achieving optimal C _min. Patients administered vancomycin for ≥72 h from January to June 2018 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: loading (LD) and non-loading (NLD). LD was defined as initial vancomycin dose ≥20 mg/kg and ≥120% of maintenance dose. During study period, 70 and 71 received initial LD (24.2 ± 2.5 mg/kg) and NLD (17.3 ± 3.3 mg/kg) doses of vancomycin, respectively (p < .001). Achievement of optimal C _min was not different before administration of the third dose (24.4% in LD versus 18.2% in NLD, p = .484) and within 72 h (22.9% versus 28.2%, p = .759). Risk factors for failure to achieve optimal C _min before administration of the third dose were higher creatinine clearance and higher level of serum albumin. Therefore, more sufficient loading or patient-specific dose strategies should be used to achieve optimal serum vancomycin C _min.

Application of Pharmacometrics in Pharmacotherapy: Open-Source Software for Vancomycin Therapeutic Drug Management

The population pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters that are implemented in therapeutic drug management (TDM) software were generally obtained from a Western population and might not be adequate for PK prediction with a Korean population. This study aimed to develop a population PK model for vancomycin using Korean data to improve the quality of TDM for Korean patients. A total of 220 patients (1020 observations) who received vancomycin TDM services were included in the dataset. A population PK analysis was performed using non-linear mixed effects modeling, and a covariate evaluation was conducted. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination best explained the vancomycin PK, with estimates of 2.82 L/h, 31.8 L, 11.7 L/h, and 75.4 L for CL, V1, Q, and V2, respectively. In the covariate analysis, weight correlated with the volume of the peripheral compartment, and creatinine clearance, hemodialysis, and continuous renal replacement therapy treatments contributed to the clearance of vancomycin. The results show the clear need to optimize the PK parameters used for TDM in Korean patients. Specifically, V1 should be smaller for Korean patients, and renal replacement therapies should be considered in TDM practice. This final model was successfully applied in R shiny as open-source software for Koreans.

Evaluation of efficacy and nephrotoxicity during vancomycin therapy: A retrospective study in China

The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of vancomycin serum concentrations regarding its efficacy and nephrotoxicity in a Chinese population and to determine a relatively safe optimal target concentration during vancomycin therapy. A total of 65 patients that received vancomycin between March 2013 and March 2018 at Shanghai 10th People's Hospital (Shanghai, China) were enrolled and their vancomycin trough and peak concentrations were monitored. Factor analysis was performed in order to exclude interaction between variables. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of drug efficacy and nephrotoxicity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the thresholds of the vancomycin trough and peak concentrations for optimal efficacy and acceptable nephrotoxicity, respectively. Among the 65 cases, treatment was deemed to be effective for 43 patients and ineffective for 22 patients. Furthermore, 20 patients fulfilled the criteria for nephrotoxicity. A total of 15 continuous variables loaded the first five factors by factor analysis (which converts large numbers of highly inter-correlated variables into a small number of comprehensive indicators that reflect a dimensionality reduction) and the factors were as follows: Inflammation, renal function, liver function, vancomycin trough and peak concentrations, and nutritional status. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the trough concentration and peak concentration as independent variables associated with efficacy and nephrotoxicity of vancomycin, and the nutritional status was a risk factor associated with efficacy. Regarding efficacy, the critical values for the trough concentration and peak concentration were determined to be 9.02 mg/l (95.3% sensitivity and 68.2% specificity) and 23.62 mg/l (83.7% sensitivity and 59.1% specificity), respectively. The thresholds of vancomycin trough and peak concentrations for the development of nephrotoxicity were 16.08 mg/l (80.0% sensitivity and 84.4% specificity) and 30.42 mg/l (75.0% sensitivity and 73.3% specificity), respectively. In conclusion, during vancomycin therapy, the trough and peak concentrations are associated with efficacy and nephrotoxicity. Furthermore, a trough concentration between 9.02 and 16.08 mg/l and a peak concentration of 23.62-30.42 mg/l were determined to be relatively safe (the clinical trial registry no. ChiCTR-OPC-16007920).

Elevated Vancomycin Trough Levels in a Tertiary Health System: Frequency, Risk Factors, and Prognosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the frequency of, risk factors for, and outcomes after elevated levels of vancomycin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified hospitalizations among 21,285 individuals in which intravenous vancomycin was given between August 29, 2007, and October 10, 2014. We investigated frequency and risk factors for elevated vancomycin levels (trough levels >30 mg/L) as well as associations with subsequent acute kidney injury (AKI), length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 21,285 patients, the mean age was 62.9 years, and 10,478 (49.2%) were female. Trough levels of vancomycin were checked in 7422 patients, and 755 elevated levels were detected. Compared with patients with trough levels checked but no elevated levels found, those with elevated levels had longer duration of vancomycin therapy (median, 6.0 days vs 3.4 days; P<.001) and slightly higher doses (mean, 1.72 g vs 1.58 g; P<.001). Patients with higher body mass index or lower estimated glomerular filtration rate had more elevated levels. In propensity-matched analyses, patients had higher risk of incident AKI after elevated levels compared with patients without elevated levels (hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.09-2.20; P=.02), as well as longer subsequent length of stay (relative risk, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28; P=.03) but similar in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

In this study, elevated vancomycin levels were common, particularly in patients with higher body mass index and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and were associated with greater subsequent AKI and length of stay.

Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis and Clinical Trial Simulation to Inform Dose Titration Decisions

Optimal dose selection in clinical trials is problematic when efficacious and toxic concentrations are close. A novel quantitative approach follows for optimizing dose titration in clinical trials. A system of pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, efficacy, and toxicity was simulated for scenarios characterized by varying degrees of different types of variability. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and clinical trial simulation (CTS) were used to optimize drug titration by maximizing efficacy/safety. The scenarios included were a low-variability base scenario, and high residual (20%), interoccasion (20%), interindividual (40%), and residual plus interindividual variability scenarios, and finally a shallow toxicity slope scenario. The percentage of subjects having toxicity was reduced by 87.4% to 93.5%, and those having efficacy was increased by 52.7% to 243%. Interindividual PK variability may have less impact on optimal cutoff values than other sources of variability. ROC/CTS methods for optimizing dose titration offer an individualized approach that leverages exposure-response relationships.

Prospective Cohort Study of the Tolerability of Prosthetic Joint Infection Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy

The empirical use of vancomycin in combination with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam is currently recommended after the initial surgery of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the tolerability of such high-dose intravenous regimens is poorly known. Adult patients receiving an empirical antimicrobial therapy (EAT) for a PJI were enrolled in a prospective cohort study (2011 to 2016). EAT-related adverse events (AE) were described according to the common terminology criteria for AE (CTCAE), and their determinants were assessed by logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. The EAT of the 333 included patients (median age, 69.8 years; interquartile range [IQR], 59.3 to 79.1 years) mostly relies on vancomycin (n = 229, 68.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (n = 131, 39.3%), and/or third-generation cephalosporins (n = 50, 15%). Forty-two patients (12.6%) experienced an EAT-related AE. Ten (20.4%) AE were severe (CTCAE grade ≥ 3). The use of vancomycin (odds ratio [OR], 6.9; 95% confidence interval [95%CI], 2.1 to 22.9), piperacillin-tazobactam (OR, 3.7; 95%CI, 1.8 to 7.2), or the combination of both (OR, 4.1; 95%CI, 2.1 to 8.2) were the only AE predictors. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was the most common AE (n = 25; 51.0% of AE) and was also associated with the use of the vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam combination (OR, 6.7; 95%CI, 2.6 to 17.3). A vancomycin plasma overexposure was noted in nine (37.5%) of the vancomycin-related AKIs only. Other vancomycin-based therapies were significantly less at risk for AE and AKI. The EAT of PJI is associated with an important rate of AE, linked with the use of the vancomycin and the piperacillin-tazobactam combination. These results corroborate recent findings suggesting a synergic toxicity of these drugs in comparison to vancomycin-cefepime, which remains to be evaluated in PJI. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03010293.).

ELISA-based detection of gentamicin and vancomycin in protein-containing samples

Background

Orthopaedic implant infections are treated by surgical debridement, systematic antibiotic treatment or local antibiotic treatment with antibiotic-loaded beads. Currently antibiotic concentrations in wound exudate, serum, urine or tissue samples are determined with HPLC or fluorescent spectrometric assays. Both methods are heavily influenced due to proteins in the samples.

Questions/purposes

Is ELISA capable to detect gentamicin and vancomycin in protein-containing samples like serum and wound exudate.

Methods

Two specific competitive ELISA-assays were set-up to detect either gentamicin or vancomycin in protein-rich samples. An antibiotic-BSA hapten was generated as a coatable antigen and commercially available antibodies were applied for downstream immunodetection.

Results

The developed ELISAs perform at a detection range of 2–500 ng/ml gentamycin and 20–5000 ng/ml vancomycin. Both ELISAs were capable of detecting these antibiotics in human serum and wound exudate without being compromised by the presence of proteins. We did not detect cross-reactivity for gentamicin in the vancomycin ELISA or vice versa.

Conclusions

The antibiotic ELISAs detect gentamicin and vancomycin at low concentrations in protein-rich samples and they can be used as a high throughput and cost-effective alternative for chromatographic or fluorescent methods.

Clinical relevance

These ELISAs can be used to detect very low gentamicin or vancomycin concentrations in clinical samples or assess novel orthopaedic antibiotic release systems in in vitro and in vivo studies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1411-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.