Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Oral Anticancer Drugs: The Dutch Pharmacology Oncology Group-Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Protocol for a Prospective Study

Sunitinib for the treatment of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the effect of TDM-guided dose optimization on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Sunitinib is an oral anticancer drug approved for the treatment of among others gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Previous analyses demonstrated an exposure-response relationship at the standard dose, and minimum target levels of drug exposure have been defined above which better treatment outcomes are observed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) could be used as a tool to optimize the individual dose, aiming at sunitinib trough concentrations ≥37.5 ng/ml for continuous dosing. Nonetheless, data on the added value of TDM-guided dosing on clinical endpoints are currently lacking. Therefore, we evaluate the effect of TDM in patients with advanced and metastatic GIST treated with sunitinib in terms of efficacy and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A TDM-guided cohort was compared to a non-TDM-guided cohort in terms of median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). Also, mPFS between patients with and without dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) was compared. Patients in the prospective cohort were included in two studies on TDM-guided dosing (the DPOG-TDM study and TUNE study). The retrospective cohort consisted of patients from the Dutch GIST Registry who did not receive TDM-guided dosing.

RESULTS

In total, 51 and 106 patients were included in the TDM-guided cohort and non-TDM-guided cohort, respectively. No statistical difference in mPFS was observed between these two cohorts (39.4 versus 46.9 weeks, respectively; P = 0.52). Patients who experienced sunitinib-induced DLTs had longer mPFS compared to those who did not (51.9 versus 28.9 weeks, respectively; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results do not support the routine use of TDM-guided dose optimization of sunitinib in patients with advanced/metastatic GIST to improve survival.

Facile synthesis of nitrogen-doped carbon dots for ultrasensitive detection of anticancer drug gefitinib based on IFE

Gefitinib, a highly significant antitumor drug, is now commonly employed in clinical settings as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, colon cancer, and breast cancer. Herein, a convenient, rapid, and accurate fluorescence method based on nitrogen-doped carbon dots (NCDs) was designed for ultrasensitive detection of gefitinib. The NCDs were easily synthesized through one-pot hydrothermal process using p-phenylenediamine and D-glutamic acid as the precursors. The sensing strategy relied on the fluorescence of NCDs at 345 nm, which was selectively reduced by gefitinib based on the inner filter effect (IFE). With a broad linear range of 0.025-30 μg/mL and a low limit of detection of 5.5 ng/mL, the probe was successfully applied to the detection of gefitinib in human serum samples, demonstrating strong practicality, affordability, and high accuracy. The proposed sensor is simple in design, fast in detection and cost-effective, and exhibits promising application in drug real-time analysis.

Imatinib plasma levels in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour under routine clinical practice conditions

OBJECTIVES

Imatinib is the first therapeutic option for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Previous studies have shown an improvement in patient survival rates following the use of imatinib. Nevertheless, adequate plasma concentrations of imatinib are necessary to achieve such improvement in survival and limit the toxicity of the drug. This study aims to analyse the influence of imatinib plasma concentrations on efficacy and safety in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This descriptive, multicentre study analysed plasma levels of imatinib in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the period 2019-2020. An optimal therapeutic range of 750-1500 ng/mL was established for the patient stratification based on their minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state.

RESULTS

This study included 11 patients with metastatic disease in total, among whom only 54.5% (n  =  6) had a minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state value within the therapeutic range. A median progression-free survival of 7.0 months was recorded for those patients with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state < 750 ng/mL, while that median progression-free survival value remained unachieved for the group with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state > 750 ng/mL (p  =  0.005). The toxicity rate was 25% and 14.3% for patients with minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state > 1500 ng/mL and minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state ≤1500 ng/mL, respectively (p  =  0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study aims to describe the correlation between the toxicity and effectiveness of imatinib as a function of minimum plasma concentrations measured at the steady state under routine clinical practice conditions. The results described here show the usefulness of imatinib plasma concentrations monitoring as part of the standard daily routine in our hospitals.

Framework for Implementing Individualised Dosing of Anti-Cancer Drugs in Routine Care: Overcoming the Logistical Challenges

Precision medicine in oncology involves identifying the 'right drug', at the 'right dose', for the right person. Currently, many orally administered anti-cancer drugs, particularly kinase inhibitors (KIs), are prescribed at a standard fixed dose. Identifying the right dose remains one of the biggest challenges to optimal patient care. Recently the Precision Dosing Group established the Accurate Dosing of Anti-cancer Patient-centred Therapies (ADAPT) Program to address individualised dosing; thus, use existing anti-cancer drugs more safely and efficiently. In this paper, we outline our framework, based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, with a simple 6-step process and strategies which have led to the successful implementation of the ADAPT program in South Australia. Implementation strategies in our 6-step process involve: (1) Evaluate the evidence and identify the cancer drugs: Literature review, shadowing other experts, establishing academic partnerships, adaptability/flexibility; (2) Establishment of analytical equipment for drug assays for clinical purposes: assessment for readiness, accreditation, feasibility, obtaining formal commitments, quality assurance to all stakeholders; (3) Clinical preparation and education: educational material, conducted educational meetings, involve opinion leaders, use of mass media, promote network weaving, conduct ongoing training; (4) Blood collection, sample preparation and analyses: goods received procedures, critical control points (transport time); (5) Interpret and release results with recommendations: facilitate the relay of clinical data to providers; (6) Clinical application: providing ongoing consultation, identify early adopters, identify, and prepare champions. These strategies were selected from the 73 implementation strategies outlined in the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. The ADAPT program currently provides routine plasma concentrations for patients on several orally administered drugs in South Australia and is currently in its evaluation phase soon to be published. Our newly established framework could provide great potential and opportunities to advance individualised dosing of oral anti-cancer drugs in routine clinical care.

Clinical validation and assessment of feasibility of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) for monitoring of nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, trametinib, and ruxolitinib

Volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to conventional sampling. However, the applicability of VAMS must be investigated clinically. Therefore, the feasibility of at-home sampling was investigated for the kinase inhibitors nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib, trametinib and ruxolitinib and evaluated regarding the acceptance of at-home microsampling, sample quality of at-home VAMS and incurred sample stability. In addition, clinical validation including three different approaches for serum level predictions was performed. For this purpose, VAMS and reference serum samples were collected simultaneously. Conversion of VAMS to serum concentration was based either on a linear regression model, a hematocrit-dependent formula, or using a correction factor. During the study period 591 VAMS were collected from a total of 59 patients. The percentage of patients who agreed to perform VAMS at home ranged from 50.0 % to 84.6 % depending on the compound. 93.1 % of at-home VAMS were collected correctly. Regarding the drug stability in dried capillary blood, no stability issues were detected between on-site and at-home VAMS. Linear regression showed a strong correlation between VAMS and reference serum concentrations for nilotinib, cabozantinib, dabrafenib and ruxolitinib (r 0.9427 - 0.9674) and a moderate correlation for trametinib (r 0.5811). For clinical validation, the acceptance criteria were met for all three approaches for three of the five kinase inhibitors. Predictive performance was not improved by using individual hematocrit instead of population hematocrit and was largely independent of conversion model. In conclusion, VAMS at-home has been shown to be feasible for use in routine clinical care and serum values could be predicted based on the measured VAMS concentration for nilotinib, cabozantinib, and dabrafenib.

Imatinib plasma levels in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia under routine clinical practice conditions

INTRODUCTION

The addition of imatinib to the therapeutic arsenal for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has changed the natural course of the disease, in such a way that it is now considered a chronic pathology. However, to achieve therapeutic success, it is necessary to reach adequate plasma concentrations to ensure efficacy and safety.In this study, we aimed to evaluate the plasma concentration of imatinib, analysing its influence on effectiveness and safety in patients with CML.

METHODS

We performed a descriptive, multicentre study in which imatinib plasma levels from patients diagnosed with CML between 2019-2020 were analysed. An optimal therapeutic range of 750-1500 ng/mL was established for the stratification of patients, according to their minimum plasma concentrations measured at steady state (Cssmin).

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients were included, of whom only 39.3% (n = 11) showed Cssmin within the therapeutic range. 100% of patients with Cssmin >750 ng/mL achieved an optimal molecular response, while only 50% of patients with Cssmin <750 ng/mL achieved an optimal molecular response (p = 0.0004). The toxicity rate was 36.4% for patients with Cssmin >1500 ng/mL and 5.9% for those with Cssmin <1500 ng/mL (p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

This study aimed to describe the correlation between the toxicity and effectiveness of imatinib according to its Cssmin in routine clinical practice conditions. Based on our findings, it would be certainly justified to monitor patient plasma concentrations of imatinib on a daily routine basis in our hospitals.

Development and Validation of a Simple Method for Simultaneously Measuring the Concentrations of BCR-ABL and Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Dried Blood Spot (DBS): A Pilot Study to Obtain Candidate Conversion Equations for Predicting Plasma Concentration Based on DBS Concentration

BACKGROUND

Dried blood spots (DBSs) are promising candidates for therapeutic drug monitoring. In this study, a simple method for the simultaneous measurement of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including bosutinib, dasatinib, ibrutinib, imatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib, using DBS was developed and validated. The prediction of the plasma concentration of TKIs based on the TKI concentrations in the DBS was assessed using the developed measurement method.

METHODS

DBS was prepared using venous blood on Whatman 903 cards. One whole DBS sample containing the equivalent of 40 μL of blood was used for the analysis. The analytical method was validated according to the relevant guidelines. For clinical validation, 96 clinical samples were analyzed. The regression equation was derived from a weighted Deming regression analysis, and correction factors for calculating the estimated plasma concentrations (EPCs) of the analytes from their concentrations in the DBS and the predictive performance of EPC were evaluated using 2 conversion equations.

RESULTS

This method was successfully validated. Hematocrit had no significant effect on the method's accuracy or precision. Ibrutinib was stable in the DBS for up to 8 weeks at room temperature, whereas all BCR-ABL TKIs were stable for 12 weeks. All BCR-ABL TKIs exhibited similar predictive performance for EPCs using both calculation methods. Good agreement between EPCs and the measured plasma concentrations of bosutinib, imatinib, and ponatinib was observed with both conversion equations. However, Bland-Altman analysis showed that blood sampling time affected the EPC accuracy for dasatinib and nilotinib.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple method for the simultaneous determination of BCR-ABL and Bruton TKI concentrations in DBS was developed and validated. Owing to the small clinical sample size, further clinical validation is needed to determine the predictive performance of EPCs for the 6 TKIs.

Therapeutic drug monitoring-based precision dosing of oral targeted therapies in oncology: a prospective multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Oral targeted therapies show a high pharmacokinetic (PK) interpatient variability. Even though exposure has been positively correlated with efficacy for many of these drugs, these are still dosed using a one-size-fits-all approach. Consequently, individuals have a high probability to be either underexposed or overexposed, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring, which is personalized dosing based on measured systemic drug concentrations, could address these problems.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were enrolled in this prospective multicenter study (www.trialregister.nl; NL6695) if they started treatment with one of the 24 participating oral targeted therapies. Primary outcome was to halve the proportion of underexposed patients, compared with historical data. PK sampling was carried out after 4, 8 and 12 weeks, and every 12 weeks thereafter. In case of Cmin below the predefined target and manageable toxicity, a pharmacokinetically guided intervention was proposed (i.e. checking compliance and drug-drug interactions, concomitant intake with food, splitting intake moments or dose increments).

RESULTS

In total, 600 patients were included of whom 426 patients are assessable for the primary outcome and 552 patients had ≥1 PK sample(s) available and were therefore assessable for the overall analyses. Pharmacokinetically guided dosing reduced the proportion of underexposed patients at the third PK measurement by 39.0% (95% confidence interval 28.0% to 49.0%) compared with historical data. At the third PK measurement, 110 out of 426 patients (25.8%) had a low exposure. In total, 294 patients (53.3%) had ≥1 PK sample(s) below the preset target at a certain time point during treatment. In 166 of these patients (56.5%), pharmacokinetically guided interventions were carried out, which were successful in 113 out of 152 assessable patients (74.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacokinetically guided dose optimization of oral targeted therapies was feasible in clinical practice and reduced the proportion of underexposed patients considerably.

Feasibility of therapeutic drug monitoring of sorafenib in patients with liver or thyroid cancer

INTRODUCTION

Sorafenib is a tyrosine-kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, and desmoid fibromatosis. As high inter-individual variability exists in exposure, there is a scientific rationale to pursue therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). We investigated the feasibility of TDM in patients on sorafenib and tried to identify sub-groups in whom pharmacokinetically (PK) guided-dosing might be of added value.

METHODS

We included patients who started on sorafenib (between October 2017 and June 2020) at the recommended dose of 400 mg BID or with a step-up dosing schedule. Plasma trough levels (C_trough) were measured at pre-specified time-points. Increasing the dose was advised if C_trough was below the target of 3750 ng/mL and toxicity was manageable.

RESULTS

A total of 150 samples from 36 patients were collected. Thirty patients (83 %) had a C_trough below the prespecified target concentration at a certain time point during treatment. Toxicity from sorafenib hampered dosing according to target C_trough in almost half of the patients. In 11 patients, dosing was adjusted based on C_trough. In three patients, this resulted in an adequate C_trough without additional toxicity four weeks after the dose increase. In the remaining eight patients, dose adjustment based on C_trough did not result in a C_trough above the target or caused excessive toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

TDM for sorafenib is not of added value in daily clinical practice. In most cases, toxicity restricts the possibility of dose escalations.

Simultaneous quantitative detection of afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib, osimertinib and their metabolites in plasma samples of patients with non-small cell lung cancer using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

As numerous studies have reported the concentration-exposure relationships of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), therapeutic drug monitoring is a promising approach in lung cancer treatment, aiming to avoid treatment failure or toxicity. A new method for the simultaneous analysis of five EGFR-TKIs (afatinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, icotinib and osimertinib) and their metabolites in human plasma samples was developed and validated using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Afatinib-d₆, erlotinib-d₆, OSI-420-d_4, gefitinib-d₆ and osimertinib-C₁₃,d₃ were used as internal standards (ISs). The samples were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction using tert-butyl methyl ether. Chromatographic separation was undertaken on an XBridge C₁₈ column using a linear gradient elution. LC-MS/MS was conducted in positive ionization mode with multiple reaction monitoring.

RESULTS

The proposed method showed satisfactory results in terms of linearity, sensitivity, specificity, precision (intra- and inter-day coefficients of variation ranged from 1.1 to 13.9%), and accuracy (from 93.3 to 111.1%). The IS-normalized matrix factors were below 15%. The sensitivity and linearity were highly appropriate for the expected concentrations according to the analysis of samples from non-small cell lung caner (NSCLC) patients who received EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method showed an acceptable reproducibility, high sensitivity and selectivity, and low matrix effects. This method could be significant for monitoring plasma concentrations of the mentioned EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients, aiming to improve the efficacy and safety of targeted therapies.

An Easily Expandable Multi-Drug LC-MS Assay for the Simultaneous Quantification of 57 Oral Antitumor Drugs in Human Plasma

Simple Summary

Oral antitumor therapy has significantly improved clinical outcomes in multiple tumor entities. However, following a standard dosing regime, strong interindividual variability in patients’ plasma concentrations can be observed for many oral antitumor drugs. This results in risks of reduced therapeutic effect and increased side effects. Monitoring these variable plasma concentrations is an important tool in evaluating multiple factors influencing drug exposure and, if necessary, adjusting therapeutic doses. Here, we developed a method for the simultaneous measurement of 57 oral antitumor drug plasma concentrations. Detection and quantification were achieved using liquid chromatography coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer, which can be easily expanded to newly approved oral antitumor drugs in the future. Applicability of the method was proven by measuring 71 plasma samples from 39 patients undergoing oral antitumor therapy. In summary, the developed method provides an important tool for exposure measurements of oral antitumor drugs.

Abstract

Oral anticancer drugs have led to significant improvements in the treatment of multiple tumor entities. However, in patients undergoing oral antitumor therapy, plasma concentrations are highly variable, resulting in risks of reduced therapeutic effects or an increase in side effects. One important tool to reduce this variability is therapeutic drug monitoring. In this work we describe a method to simultaneously quantify the plasma concentrations of 57 oral antitumor agents. Quantification of these drugs was achieved using liquid chromatography coupled to an Orbitrap mass spectrometer. The method was fully validated according to the FDA guidelines and constitutes a simple and robust way for exposure monitoring of a wide variety of oral anticancer drugs. Applicability to clinical routine was demonstrated by the analysis of 71 plasma samples taken from 39 patients. In summary, this new multi-drug method allows simultaneous quantification of 57 oral antitumor drugs, which can be applied to exposure monitoring in clinical studies, taking into account the broad variety of oral antitumor drugs prescribed in clinical routine.

Precision Dosing of Targeted Therapies Is Ready for Prime Time

Fixed dosing of oral targeted therapies is inadequate in the era of precision medicine. Personalized dosing, based on pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure, known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), is rational and supported by increasing evidence. The purpose of this perspective is to discuss whether randomized studies are needed to confirm the clinical value of precision dosing in oncology. PK-based dose adjustments are routinely made for many drugs and are recommended by health authorities, for example, for patients with renal impairment or for drug-drug interaction management strategies. Personalized dosing simply extrapolates this paradigm from selected patient populations to each individual patient with suboptimal exposure, irrespective of the underlying cause. If it has been demonstrated that exposure is related to a relevant clinical outcome, such as efficacy or toxicity, and that exposure can be optimized by PK-guided dosing, it could be logically assumed that PK-guided dosing would result in better treatment outcomes without the need for randomized confirmatory trials. We propose a path forward to demonstrate the clinical relevance of individualized dosing of molecularly-targeted anticancer drugs.

Developing a Nationwide Infrastructure for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Targeted Oral Anticancer Drugs: The ON-TARGET Study Protocol

Simple Summary

Relationships between drug concentrations in blood and efficacy and/or toxicity have been reported for up to 80% of oral anticancer drugs (OADs). Most OADs exhibit highly variable drug concentrations at the approved dose. This may result in a significant proportion of patients with suboptimal drug concentrations. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), which is dose optimization based on measured drug concentrations, can be used to personalize drug dosing with the overall goal to improve the benefit-risk ratio of anticancer drug treatment. The ON-TARGET study aims to investigate the feasibility of TDM in patients receiving either axitinib or cabozantinib for the treatment of renal-cell carcinoma with the main objective to improve severe tyrosine kinase inhibitor associated toxicity. Additionally, the feasibility of volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), a novel minimally invasive and easy to handle blood sampling technique, for TDM sample collection is investigated.

Abstract

Exposure-efficacy and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been identified for up to 80% of oral anticancer drugs (OADs). Usually, OADs are administered at fixed doses despite their high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability resulting in large differences in drug exposure. Consequently, a substantial proportion of patients receive a suboptimal dose. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM), i.e., dosing based on measured drug concentrations, may be used to improve treatment outcomes. The prospective, multicenter, non-interventional ON-TARGET study (DRKS00025325) aims to investigate the potential of routine TDM to reduce adverse drug reactions in renal cell carcinoma patients receiving axitinib or cabozantinib. Furthermore, the feasibility of using volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS), a minimally invasive and easy to handle blood sampling technique, for sample collection is examined. During routine visits, blood samples are collected and sent to bioanalytical laboratories. Venous and VAMS blood samples are collected in the first study phase to facilitate home-based capillary blood sampling in the second study phase. Within one week, the drug plasma concentrations are measured, interpreted, and reported back to the physician. Patients report their drug intake and toxicity using PRO-CTCAE-based questionnaires in dedicated diaries. Ultimately, the ON-TARGET study aims to develop a nationwide infrastructure for TDM for oral anticancer drugs.

An Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Method for the Simultaneous Determination of Afatinib, Alectinib, Ceritinib, Crizotinib, Dacomitinib, Erlotinib, Gefitinib, and Osimertinib in Human Serum

BACKGROUND

Routine therapeutic drug monitoring is a promising approach for the rational use of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the simultaneous determination of 5 EGFR-TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib) and 3 ALK inhibitors (alectinib, ceritinib, and crizotinib).

METHODS

A 100-mL aliquot of serum was diluted with 100 μL of 1% aqueous ammonia containing internal standards and then purified using the supported liquid extraction method. LC-MS/MS was conducted in positive ionization mode, and the method was validated according to published guidelines.

RESULTS

Calibration curves were linear across concentration ranges examined. The intra- and interassay accuracies were 90.7%-110.7% and 94.7%-107.6%, respectively. All intra- and interassay imprecision values were ≤10.1%. The EGFR-TKIs and ALK inhibitors examined in this study, except osimertinib, which could be stored on ice for at least 5 hours, were stable at room temperature for 3 hours. For the internal standard-normalized matrix factors, the mean recovery and percent coefficient of variation values ranged between 54%-112% and 1.7%-11.7%, respectively. This method successfully determined serum concentrations of afatinib, alectinib, erlotinib, gefitinib, and osimertinib in clinical samples. Serum levels of kinase inhibitors consistently reflected those reported in previous studies.

CONCLUSIONS

An LC-MS/MS method suitable for the simultaneous determination of 5 EGFR-TKIs and 3 ALK inhibitors in serum was developed and validated. The newly developed method enabled the determination of 5 of 8 target drugs examined in clinical samples. However, a large number of clinical samples need to be analyzed to verify the usefulness of the method.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in oncology: International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology consensus guidelines for imatinib therapy

Although therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is an important tool in guiding drug dosing for other areas of medicine including infectious diseases, cardiology, psychiatry and transplant medicine, it has not gained wide acceptance in oncology. For imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, a flat dosing approach is utilised for management of oral chemotherapy. There are many published studies examining the correlation of blood concentrations with clinical effects of imatinib. The International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT) determined that there was a need to examine the published literature regarding utility of TDM in imatinib therapy and to develop consensus guidelines for TDM based on the available data. This article summarises the scientific evidence regarding TDM of imatinib, as well as the consensus guidelines developed by the IATDMCT.

Past, present and future perspectives of therapeutic drug monitoring in India

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is the clinical practice of performing drug assays and interpreting results to maintain constant therapeutic concentrations in patients' bloodstream. Conventional TDM was started way back in the 1960s and served to optimise pharmacotherapy by maximising therapeutic efficacy by evaluating efficacy failure and monitoring drug compliance, while minimising adverse events, in drugs with a narrow therapeutic range. Currently, the scope of TDM has been extended to additional indications which are of importance to India. Apart from the conventional indications, TDM can also help combat drug resistance amongst patients treated with antimicrobials, including anti-tubercular drugs and critically ill patients with compromised pharmacokinetics. TDM is also indicated for patients on antiretroviral drugs under specific clinical scenarios and is of high importance to India. Target concentration intervention (TCI) and apriori TDM (by merging TDM with pharmacogenomics) are emerging fields explored in developed nations. The authors sought to assess the evolution of TDM in India and evaluate the potential impact of newer indications in rationalising pharmacotherapy. In the mid-1980s, TDM was presented to India. Despite showing some initial progress, its use is limited to conventional indications. Its utility is also challenged by cost and higher reliance on conventional prescribing practices. However, the newer indications such as antimicrobial resistance, tuberculosis and HIV, with their high prevalence in developing nations, present an opportunity for the growth of TDM in these countries. Indian clinician's awareness and buoyant demands alongside expert contributions from clinical pharmacologists could widen its scope.

A novel method for the quantification of anlotinib in human plasma using two-dimensional liquid chromatography

A simple, efficient, and stable detection method of two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC) was established and validated to determine anlotinib in the human plasma. The 2D-LC system comprises a first-dimensional column (LC1), an intermediate transfer column, and a second-dimensional column (LC2). With simple protein precipitation treatment, the samples were processed directly for detection. The analysis cycle time was completed within 9.50 min. For the anlotinib concentrations, the calibration curve was linear over the 5.00-320.00 ng/mL range. The intra-day and inter-day precision ranges were 0.77-6.22% and 1.92-4.26%, respectively, for anlotinib concentrations. The recoveries were in the range of 97.85-102.50%. A total of 135 plasma samples from 94 patients were analyzed by our method. The plasma concentrations of patients were in the range of 5.17-106.38 ng/mL, in which the female had a higher plasma concentration (6.44-106.38 ng/mL). The simultaneous application of dexamethasone can increase the anlotinib concentration in the plasma. In our clinical application, we found that the factors that affect the plasma concentration include the time and dose of the medication, gender, and drug interactions. The method appears to be sensitive, precise, selective, and suitable for determining the concentration of anlotinib in the plasma sample.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs

PURPOSE

This review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.

RESULTS

OADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.

CONCLUSION

Sub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.

The Right Dose: From Phase I to Clinical Practice

To realize the full potential of promising new anticancer drugs, it is of paramount importance to administer them at the right dose. The aim of this educational article is to provide several opportunities to optimize anticancer drug dosing, focusing on oral targeted therapies. First, therapeutic drug monitoring can optimize exposure in individual patients, if the optimal concentration is known. This approach is of particular interest in regard to oral kinase inhibitors with high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. If exposure is related to response, then therapeutic drug monitoring is potentially feasible, although the clinical utility of this approach has not yet been established. Other approaches to reduce variability include administration of more frequent, smaller doses and administration under optimal prandial conditions. However, for many drugs, the labeled dose has not been demonstrated to be the optimal dose; for such agents, the vast majority of patients may be receiving excessive doses, which results in excessive toxicity. Furthermore, administration of lower off-label doses may reduce both medical and financial toxicity. These strategies should be applied from registration studies to clinical practice, with the goal of better optimizing anticancer treatment.

Feasibility of Extrapolating Randomly Taken Plasma Samples to Trough Levels for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Purposes of Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitors

Small molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKIs) are widely used in oncology. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for SMKIs could reduce underexposure or overexposure. However, logistical issues such as timing of blood withdrawals hamper its implementation into clinical practice. Extrapolating a random concentration to a trough concentration using the elimination half-life could be a simple and easy way to overcome this problem. In our study plasma concentrations observed during 24 h blood sampling were used for extrapolation to trough levels. The objective was to demonstrate that extrapolation of randomly taken blood samples will lead to equivalent estimated trough samples compared to measured C_min values. In total 2241 blood samples were analyzed. The estimated C_trough levels of afatinib and sunitinib fulfilled the equivalence criteria if the samples were drawn after T_max. The calculated C_trough levels of erlotinib, imatinib and sorafenib met the equivalence criteria if they were taken, respectively, 12 h, 3 h and 10 h after drug intake. For regorafenib extrapolation was not feasible. In conclusion, extrapolation of randomly taken drug concentrations to a trough concentration using the mean elimination half-life is feasible for multiple SMKIs. Therefore, this simple method could positively contribute to the implementation of TDM in oncology.

Inhibiting CDK4/6 in Breast Cancer with Palbociclib, Ribociclib, and Abemaciclib: Similarities and Differences

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors belong to a new class of drugs that interrupt proliferation of malignant cells by inhibiting progression through the cell cycle. Three such inhibitors, palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib were recently approved for breast cancer treatment in various settings and combination regimens. On the basis of their impressive efficacy, all three CDK4/6 inhibitors now play an important role in the treatment of patients with HR+, HER2- breast cancer; however, their optimal use still needs to be established. The three drugs have many similarities in both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. However, there are some differences on the basis of which the choice for a particular CDK4/6 inhibitor for an individual patient can be important. In this article, the clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of the three CDK4/6 inhibitors are reviewed and important future directions of the clinical applicability of CDK4/6 inhibitors will be discussed.

Exposure-Response Analyses of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors Crizotinib and Alectinib in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Crizotinib and alectinib are anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-inhibitors indicated for the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At the currently used fixed doses, interindividual variability in exposure is high. The aim of this study was to investigate whether minimum plasma concentrations (C_min ) of crizotinib and alectinib are related to efficacy and toxicity. An observational study was performed, in which ALK-positive NSCLC patients who were treated with crizotinib and alectinib and from whom pharmacokinetic samples were collected in routine care, were included in the study. Exposure-response analyses were explored using previously proposed C_min thresholds of 235 ng/mL for crizotinib and 435 ng/mL for alectinib. Forty-eight crizotinib and 52 alectinib patients were included. For crizotinib, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.7 vs. 17.4 months for patients with C_min  < 235 ng/mL (48%) and ≥ 235 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.08). In multivariable analysis, C_min  < 235 ng/mL resulted in a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.79 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-3.59, P = 0.100). In a pooled analysis of all crizotinib patients (not only ALK-positive, n = 79), the HR was 2.15 (95% CI, 1.21-3.84, P = 0.009). For alectinib, mPFS was 12.6 months vs. not estimable (95% CI, 19.8-not estimable) for patients with C_min  < 435 ng/mL (37%) and ≥ 435 ng/mL, respectively (P = 0.04). Multivariable analysis resulted in an HR of 4.29 (95% CI, 1.33-13.90, P = 0.015). In conclusion, PFS of crizotinib and alectinib treated NSCLC patients is prolonged in patients with C_min  ≥ 235 ng/mL and 435 ng/mL, respectively. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be part of routine clinical management for these agents.

A comprehensive review of economic evaluations of therapeutic drug monitoring interventions for cancer treatments

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of cancer drugs has been shown to improve treatment effectiveness and safety. The aim of this paper was to comprehensively review economic evaluations of TDM interventions for cancer drugs. Searches were conducted in 4 electronic databases, Medline, EMBASE, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and the NHS Economic Evaluation Database), from their inception to June 2019. Studies were included if they were economic evaluations of TDM interventions for an active cancer treatment. The quality of reporting of economic evaluations was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS checklist). Of the 11 publications identified, imatinib with TDM and 5-fluorouracil with TDM were the most commonly assessed interventions (4 publications each). Overall study quality was good, with publications meeting 61 to 91% (median 80%) of CHEERS checklist criteria. A variety of studies were used to estimate the clinical effectiveness inputs for the cost effectiveness models. All publications considered TDM to be cost-effective based on an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below the willingness to pay threshold (64%) or being cost-saving (36%). TDM interventions were considered cost-effective across the economic evaluations. Further clinical research assessing the impact of TDM on overall survival or other long-term health outcomes may enhance the evidence base for TDM in oncology. Future economic evaluations of TDM should explicitly consider uncertainty in the underlying clinical evidence and incorporate changes in the use of newer targeted drugs that form the current standard of care.

On precision dosing of oral small molecule drugs in oncology

Personalization of oral small molecule anticancer drug doses based on individual patient blood drug levels, also known as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), has the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of treatment by maximizing drug efficacy and minimize toxicity. However, this option has not yet been widely embraced by the oncology community. Some reasons for this include increased logistical complexity of dose individualization, the lack of clinical laboratories that measure small molecule drug concentrations in support of patient care, and the lack of reimbursement of costs. However, the main obstacle may be the lack of studies clearly demonstrating that monitoring of oral small molecule anticancer drug levels actually improves clinical outcomes. Without unequivocal evidence in support of TDM-guided dose individualization, especially demonstration of improved survival with TDM in randomized controlled trials, wide acceptance of this approach by oncologists and reimbursement by insurance companies is unlikely, and patients may continue to suffer as a result of receiving incorrect drug doses. This article reviews the current status of TDM of oral small molecule drugs in oncology and intends to provide strategic insights into the design of studies for evaluating the utility of TDM in this clinical context.

The Steps to Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: A Structured Approach Illustrated With Imatinib

Pharmacometric methods have hugely benefited from progress in analytical and computer sciences during the past decades, and play nowadays a central role in the clinical development of new medicinal drugs. It is time that these methods translate into patient care through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), due to become a mainstay of precision medicine no less than genomic approaches to control variability in drug response and improve the efficacy and safety of treatments. In this review, we make the case for structuring TDM development along five generic questions: 1) Is the concerned drug a candidate to TDM? 2) What is the normal range for the drug's concentration? 3) What is the therapeutic target for the drug's concentration? 4) How to adjust the dosage of the drug to drive concentrations close to target? 5) Does evidence support the usefulness of TDM for this drug? We exemplify this approach through an overview of our development of the TDM of imatinib, the very first targeted anticancer agent. We express our position that a similar story shall apply to other drugs in this class, as well as to a wide range of treatments critical for the control of various life-threatening conditions. Despite hurdles that still jeopardize progress in TDM, there is no doubt that upcoming technological advances will shape and foster many innovative therapeutic monitoring methods.

Cost-Neutral Optimization of Pazopanib Exposure by Splitting Intake Moments: A Prospective Pharmacokinetic Study in Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pazopanib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. At the approved dose of 800 mg once daily (QD), 16-20% of patients are being underdosed and at risk of decreased efficacy. This study aimed to show whether splitting intake moments, as a cost-neutral alternative to a dose increase, leads to an increased exposure.

METHODS

We performed a cross-over trial comparing the pharmacokinetics of pazopanib 800 mg QD with pazopanib 400 mg twice daily. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed at steady-state for both dosing schedules.

RESULTS

Nine evaluable patients were included. At the 800 mg QD dosing schedule, median minimum plasma concentration (C_min), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC_0-24h), and maximum plasma concentration (C_max) were 23.2 mg/L (interquartile range 18.5-27.6), 773 mg h/L (557-1009), and 40.6 mg/L (36.4-56.4) compared with 41.6 mg/L (30.5-55.8, p = 0.004), 942 mg h/L (885-1419, p = 0.027), and 50.2 mg/L (46.8-72.5, p = 0.074) at 400 mg twice daily. One patient experienced a grade 3 event (i.e., diarrhea).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that splitting intake moments of pazopanib leads to a 79% increase in C_min, with acceptable tolerability. Therefore, this new dosing schedule offers a cost-neutral opportunity to optimize treatment in patients with low exposure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NL6137 ( http://www.trialregister.nl ).