Tacrolimus Bayesian Dose Adjustment in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients

Getting Tacrolimus Dosing Right

ABSTRACT

Tacrolimus (TAC) dosing is typically guided by the trough concentration (C0). Yet, significant relationships between TAC C0 and clinical outcomes have seldom been reported or only with adverse events. Large retrospective studies found a moderate correlation between TAC C0 and the area under the curve (AUC), where, for any given C0 value, the AUC varied 3- to 4-fold between patients (and vice versa). However, no randomized controlled trial evaluating the dose adjustment based on TAC AUC has been conducted yet. A few observational studies have shown that the AUC is associated with efficacy and, to a lesser extent, adverse effects. Other studies showed the feasibility of reaching predefined target ranges and reducing underexposure and overexposure. TAC AUC0-12 h is now most often assessed using Bayesian estimation, but machine learning is a promising approach. Microsampling devices are well accepted by patients and represent a valuable alternative to venous blood sample collection during hospital visits, especially when a limited sampling strategy is required. As AUC monitoring cannot be proposed very frequently, C0 monitoring has to be used in the interim, which has led to fluctuating doses in patients with an AUC/C0 ratio far from the population mean, because of different dose recommendations between the 2 biomarkers. We proposed estimating the individual AUC/C0 ratio and derived individual C0 targets to be used in between or as a replacement for AUC monitoring. Existing technology and evidence are now sufficient to propose AUC monitoring interspersed with individualized-C0 monitoring for all patients with kidney transplants while collecting real-world data to strengthen the evidence.

Mycophenolate Mofetil Dose Adjustment in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

The Immunosuppressant Bayesian Dose Adjustment web site aids clinicians and pharmacologists involved in the care of transplant recipients; it proposes dose adjustments based on the estimated area under the concentration-time curve (AUCs). Three concentrations (T 20 min , T 1 h , and T 3 h ) are sufficient to estimate mycophenolic acid (MPA) AUC 0-12 h in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. This study investigates mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) doses and MPA AUC values in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, and target exposure attainment when the proposed doses were followed, through a large-scale analysis of the data set collated since the inception of the Immunosuppressant Bayesian Dose Adjustment web site.

METHODS

In this study, 4051 MMF dose adjustment requests, corresponding to 1051 patients aged 0-18 years, were retrospectively analyzed. AUC calculations were performed in the back office of the Immunosuppressant Bayesian Dose Adjustment using published Bayesian and population pharmacokinetic models.

RESULTS

The first AUC request was posted >12 months posttransplantation for 41% of patients. Overall, only 50% had the first MPA AUC 0-12 h within the recommended 30-60 mg.h/L range. When the proposed dose was not followed, the proportion of patients with an AUC in the therapeutic range for MMF with cyclosporine or tacrolimus at the subsequent request was lower (40% and 45%, respectively) than when it was followed (58% and 60%, respectively): P = 0.08 and 0.006, respectively. Furthermore, 3 months posttransplantation, the dispersion of AUC values was often lower at the second visit when the proposed doses were followed, namely, P = 0.03, 0.003, and 0.07 in the 4 months-1 year, and beyond 1 year with <6-month or >6-month periods between both visits, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to extreme interindividual variability in MPA exposure, MMF dose adjustment is necessary; it is efficient at reducing such variability when based on MPA AUC.

Rejection markers in kidney transplantation: do new technologies help children?

Recent insights in allorecognition and graft rejection mechanisms revealed a more complex picture than originally considered, involving multiple pathways of both adaptive and innate immune response, supplied by efficient inflammatory synergies. Current pillars of transplant monitoring are serum creatinine, proteinuria, and drug blood levels, which are considered as traditional markers, due to consolidated experience, low cost, and widespread availability. The most diffuse immunological biomarkers are donor-specific antibodies, which are included in routine post-transplant monitoring in many centers, although with some reproducibility issues and interpretation difficulties. Confirmed abnormalities in these traditional biomarkers raise the suspicion for rejection and guide the indication for graft biopsy, which is still considered the gold standard for rejection monitoring. Rapidly evolving new "omic" technologies have led to the identification of several novel biomarkers, which may change the landscape of transplant monitoring should their potential be confirmed. Among them, urinary chemokines and measurement of cell-free DNA of donor origin are perhaps the most promising. However, at the moment, these approaches remain highly expensive and cost-prohibitive in most settings, with limited clinical applicability; approachable costs upon technology investments would speed their integration. In addition, transcriptomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and the study of blood and urinary extracellular vesicles have the potential for early identification of subclinical rejection with high sensitivity and specificity, good reproducibility, and for gaining predictive value in an affordable cost setting. In the near future, information derived from these new biomarkers is expected to integrate traditional tools in routine use, allowing identification of rejection prior to clinical manifestations and timely therapeutic intervention. This review will discuss traditional, novel, and invasive and non-invasive biomarkers, underlining their strengths, limitations, and present or future applications in children.

Contemporary Biomarkers for Renal Transplantation: A Narrative Overview

Renal transplantation (RT) is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, clinical challenges persist, i.e., early detection of graft dysfunction, timely identification of rejection episodes, personalization of immunosuppressive therapy, and prediction of long-term graft survival. Biomarkers have emerged as valuable tools to address these challenges and revolutionize RT patient care. Our review synthesizes the existing scientific literature to highlight promising biomarkers, their biological characteristics, and their potential roles in enhancing clinical decision-making and patient outcomes. Emerging non-invasive biomarkers seemingly provide valuable insights into the immunopathology of nephron injury and allograft rejection. Moreover, we analyzed biomarkers with intra-nephron specificities, i.e., glomerular vs. tubular (proximal vs. distal), which can localize an injury in different nephron areas. Additionally, this paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential clinical applications of biomarkers in the prediction, detection, differential diagnosis and assessment of post-RT non-surgical allograft complications. Lastly, we focus on the pursuit of immune tolerance biomarkers, which aims to reclassify transplant recipients based on immune risk thresholds, guide personalized immunosuppression strategies, and ultimately identify patients for whom immunosuppression may safely be reduced. Further research, validation, standardization, and prospective studies are necessary to fully harness the clinical utility of RT biomarkers and guide the development of targeted therapies.

An overview of topical lipid-based and polymer-based nanocarriers for treatment of psoriasis

Psoriasis is a consistently recurring, inflammatory skin disease, affecting about 2 - 5 % of the world population. Different types of psoriasis can be observed such as guttate psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, scalp psoriasis, flexural psoriasis etc. Several therapeutic approaches are available for the treatment of psoriasis. However, none of them are entirely safe and effective to treat the disease without compromising patient compliance. The traditional treatment plan is associated with harmful side effects such asimmune system suppression and damage of essential organs at high doses, which poses a challenge to treat psoriasis. Novel drug delivery systems are being developed to replace traditional therapy in order to address these shortcomings. Currently, nanoformulations have gained widespread application for treatment of psoriasis. Researchers have developed different types of lipid-based nanoparticles like liposomes, niosomes, ethosomes, transethosomes, nanostructured lipid carriers and solid lipid nanoparticles. These innovative formulations provide advantages in terms of reduction in dose, dosing frequency, dose-dependency with enhanced efficacy, improved encapsulation efficiency, controlled release, increased surface area, high bioavailability and greater stratum corneum permeability. This review highlights detailed and comparative discussion of lipid-based and polymer-based nanoparticles for psoriasis along with the pathophysiology and other treatments of psoriasis.

Model-informed precision dosing to optimise immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation

Immunosuppressive therapy is pivotal for sustained allograft and patient survival after renal transplantation. However, optimally balanced immunosuppressive therapy is challenged by between-patient and within-patient pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. This could warrant the application of personalised dosing strategies to optimise individual patient outcomes. Pharmacometrics, the science that investigates the xenobiotic-biotic interplay using computer-aided mathematical modelling, provides options to describe and quantify this PK variability and enables identification of patient characteristics affecting immunosuppressant PK and treatment outcomes. Here, we review and critically appraise the available pharmacometric model-informed dosing solutions for the typical immunosuppressants in modern renal transplantation, to guide their initial and subsequent dosing.