Large intraindividual variability of olanzapine serum concentrations in adolescent patients

[Therapeutic drug monitoring of olanzapine]

Olanzapine, atypical antipsychotic, is used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Its therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is quite commonly done. Olanzapine is well absorbed orally (bioavailability: 85 %), with peak plasma occurring between 4 and 6hours after oral administration. It is extensively metabolized by different hepatic enzymes (including CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 isoforms) to a large number of inactive metabolites, and its half-life is between 30 and 60hours. No specific therapeutic range, or threshold concentration could not be a consensus, but the higher intra- and interindividual variability, as well as the existence of studies suggesting a correlation between circulating concentrations of olanzapine and occurrence of therapeutic relapse or toxic phenomena appear to justify the STP for this molecule. Given these data, the interest of the STP was evaluated for this molecule to: recommended with therapeutic window of 20μg/L to 80μg/L.

Hypothalamic JNK1-hepatic fatty acid synthase axis mediates a metabolic rewiring that prevents hepatic steatosis in male mice treated with olanzapine via intraperitoneal: Additional effects of PTP1B inhibition

Olanzapine (OLA), a widely used second-generation antipsychotic (SGA), causes weight gain and metabolic alterations when administered orally to patients. Recently, we demonstrated that, contrarily to the oral treatment which induces weight gain, OLA administered via intraperitoneal (i.p.) in male mice resulted in body weight loss. This protection was due to an increase in energy expenditure (EE) through a mechanism involving the modulation of hypothalamic AMPK activation by higher OLA levels reaching this brain region compared to those of the oral treatment. Since clinical studies have shown hepatic steatosis upon chronic treatment with OLA, herein we further investigated the role of the hypothalamus-liver interactome upon OLA administration in wild-type (WT) and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B knockout (PTP1B-KO) mice, a preclinical model protected against metabolic syndrome. WT and PTP1B-KO male mice were fed an OLA-supplemented diet or treated via i.p. Mechanistically, we found that OLA i.p. treatment induces mild oxidative stress and inflammation in the hypothalamus in a JNK1-independent and dependent manner, respectively, without features of cell dead. Hypothalamic JNK activation up-regulated lipogenic gene expression in the liver though the vagus nerve. This effect concurred with an unexpected metabolic rewiring in the liver in which ATP depletion resulted in increased AMPK/ACC phosphorylation. This starvation-like signature prevented steatosis. By contrast, intrahepatic lipid accumulation was observed in WT mice treated orally with OLA; this effect being absent in PTP1B-KO mice. We also demonstrated an additional benefit of PTP1B inhibition against hypothalamic JNK activation, oxidative stress and inflammation induced by chronic OLA i.p. treatment, thereby preventing hepatic lipogenesis. The protection conferred by PTP1B deficiency against hepatic steatosis in the oral OLA treatment or against oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in the i.p. treatment strongly suggests that targeting PTP1B might be also a therapeutic strategy to prevent metabolic comorbidities in patients under OLA treatment in a personalized manner.

Effects of Dose, Age, Sex, Body Weight, and Smoking on Plasma Concentrations of Olanzapine and N-desmethyl Olanzapine in Inpatients With Schizophrenia

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the combined effects of dose, age, sex, body weight, and smoking on plasma concentrations of olanzapine (OLA) and N-desmethyl olanzapine (DMO) in Chinese inpatients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

A retrospective study including 185 inpatients was conducted. The steady-state plasma concentrations of OLA (COLA) and DMO (CDMO) were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The combined effects of dose, age, sex, body weight, and smoking on COLA and CDMO were evaluated.

FINDINGS

Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that dose, age, body weight, and smoking had significant effects on COLA and CDMO in inpatients with schizophrenia treated with OLA. The dose was the most important determinant of COLA and CDMO and was positively correlated with both. Furthermore, smokers exhibited a significantly lower COLA and COLA + DMO, whereas higher body weight led to the reduction of COLA, CDMO, and COLA + DMO. Advanced age was associated with lower CDMO.

IMPLICATIONS

These results suggest that dose, age, body weight, and smoking have a significant influence on the plasma concentration of OLA and its metabolite DMO. Clinicians should consider the combined effects when prescribing OLA to patients with schizophrenia.

Effects of Age, Drug Dose, and Sampling Time on Salivary Levels of Olanzapine, Quetiapine, and Their Metabolites

Although blood is the basic test material to monitor levels of antipsychotic drugs in a person’s system, saliva could serve as a more convenient test material. Therefore, the aim of this novel study was to determine the correlations between the salivary levels of olanzapine and quetiapine (and their metabolites: N-demethyl olanzapine and norquetiapine) and the patient’s sex and age, dose level, and the time of sampling. The study involved two groups of patients: 21 female patients starting treatment immediately after being admitted to the hospital and 36 male and female nursing home residents, long-time users of the studied drugs. Women had lower levels of the tested analytes than men. Quetiapine levels in the saliva of people starting the treatment showed a positive correlation with the age of the patients and a strong positive correlation with the dose level. The saliva levels of olanzapine showed a strong correlation with its metabolite in patients who had recently started treatment. Among long-time users of this drug, salivary levels differed significantly before and after administration. In conclusion, the results indicate that there is a possibility of using saliva as a material for monitoring quetiapine or olanzapine concentrations, especially in people starting treatment.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of children and adolescents treated with aripiprazole: observational results from routine patient care

Although aripiprazole is one of the most used antipsychotics, knowledge about serum concentrations in children and adolescents is scarce and age-specific therapeutic ranges have not been established yet. Data of a routine therapeutic drug monitoring service were analyzed in order to evaluate the relationship between dose and serum concentration of aripiprazole in children and adolescents. The study also aimed to evaluate whether the therapeutic reference range defined for adults with schizophrenia (100-350 ng/ml) is applicable for minors. Data from 130 patients (aged 7-19 years) treated with aripiprazole for different indications in doses of 2-30 mg/day were evaluated. Patient characteristics, doses, serum concentrations and therapeutic outcome were assessed by standardized measures. A positive mean correlation between body weight-corrected daily dose and aripiprazole concentration was found (r_p = 0.59, p < 0.001) with variation in dose explaining 35% of the variability in serum concentrations. Girls had on average 41% higher dose-corrected concentrations than boys (244.9 versus 173.4 mg/l; p = 0.006). Aripiprazole concentrations did not vary with co-medication (p = 0.22). About 70% of all measured serum concentrations were within the recommended therapeutic range for adults. Using a calculation method in all responding patients with an ICD-10 F2 diagnosis for a rough estimation of a preliminary therapeutic window also demonstrated a similar therapeutic range of aripiprazole in minors (105.9-375.3 ng/ml) than for adults. If confirmed in larger samples and more controlled study designs, these data may contribute to the definition of a therapeutic range of aripiprazole concentrations in children and adolescents.

Understanding variability in the pharmacokinetics of atypical antipsychotics - focus on clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole population models

Antipsychotic medicines are widely used for the management of psychotic symptoms regardless of the underlying diagnosis. Most atypical antipsychotics undergo extensive metabolism prior to excretion. Various factors may influence their pharmacokinetics, particularly elimination, leading to highly variable drug concentrations between individual patients following the same dosing regimen. Population pharmacokinetic approach, based on nonlinear mixed effects modeling, is a useful tool to identify covariates explaining pharmacokinetic variability, as well as to characterize and distinguish unexplained residual and between-subject (interindividual) variability. In addition, this approach allows the use of both sparsely and intensively sampled data. In this paper, we reviewed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole, focusing on a population modeling approach. In particular, models based on a nonlinear mixed effects approach performed by NONMEM^® software in order to identify and quantify sources of pharmacokinetic variability are presented. Population models were identified through systematic searches of PubMed and sixteen studies were selected. Some of the factors identified that significantly contribute to variability in elimination among clozapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole are demographic characteristics, body weight, genetic polymorphism, smoking and in some cases drug interactions. Scientific research based on pharmacometric modeling is useful to further characterize sources of variability and their combined effect.

Phenoconversion of CYP2D6 by inhibitors modifies aripiprazole exposure

The efficacy of aripiprazole therapy and the risk of adverse reactions are influenced by substantial inter-individual variability in aripiprazole metabolizing capacity. In vitro studies assigned the potential role in aripiprazole metabolism to CYP2D6 and CYP3A enzymes; therefore, the association between the steady-state aripiprazole plasma concentrations and patients' CYP2D6 and CYP3A statuses (CYP2D6, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5 genotypes, and CYP3A4 expression) and/or co-medication with CYP function modifying medications has been investigated in 93 psychiatric patients on stable aripiprazole therapy. The patients' CYP2D6 genotype had a major effect on aripiprazole plasma concentrations, whereas contribution of CYP3A genotypes and CYP3A4 expression to aripiprazole clearance were considered to be minor or negligible. The role of CYP3A4 expression in aripiprazole metabolism did not predominate even in the patients with nonfunctional CYP2D6 alleles. Furthermore, dehydroaripiprazole exposure was also CYP2D6 genotype-dependent. Dehydroaripiprazole concentrations were comparable with aripiprazole levels in patients with functional CYP2D6 alleles, and 35% or 22% of aripiprazole concentrations in patients with one or two non-functional CYP2D6 alleles, respectively. The concomitant intake of CYP2D6 inhibitors, risperidone, metoprolol, or propranolol was found to increase aripiprazole concentrations in patients with at least one wild-type CYP2D6*1 allele. Risperidone and 9-hydroxy-risperidone inhibited both dehydrogenation and hydroxylation of aripiprazole, whereas metoprolol and propranolol blocked merely the formation of the active dehydroaripiprazole metabolite, switching towards the inactivation pathways. Patients' CYP2D6 genotype and co-medication with CYP2D6 inhibitors can be considered to be the major determinants of aripiprazole pharmacokinetics. Taking into account CYP2D6 genotype and co-medication with CYP2D6 inhibitors may improve the outcomes of aripiprazole therapy.

A Compilation of Serum Concentrations of 12 Antipsychotic Drugs in a Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Setting

BACKGROUND

No comprehensive collection of routine therapeutic drug monitoring data for antipsychotic drugs has been published.

METHODS

In this compilation, data on 12 antipsychotics are presented. The drugs included are amisulpride (n = 506), aripiprazole (n = 1610), clozapine (n = 1189), flupentixol (n = 215), haloperidol (n = 390), olanzapine (n = 10,268), perphenazine (n = 1065), quetiapine (n = 5853), risperidone (n = 3255), sertindole (n = 111), ziprasidone (n = 1235), and zuclopenthixol (n = 691). Because only one sample per patient is included, the number of patients equals the number of samples. For each drug, median serum concentrations as well as that of the 10th and 90th percentiles are given for a range of daily doses. Comparisons are made between males and females, between patients younger than 65 years and 65 years and older, and between those treated with a low and a high dose of each drug. The concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio is the primary variable used in these comparisons. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for the serum concentrations of each drug within and between subjects are presented.

RESULTS

In general, the C/D ratios were higher in females than in males, higher in those 65 years and older than in younger subjects, and lower in those treated with higher doses than in those treated with lower doses. CVs between individuals were larger than within subjects, and the CVs were highest for the drugs with short elimination half-lives.

CONCLUSIONS

For each antipsychotic drug, the results presented can serve as a reference tool for pharmacokinetic interpretation of the individual patient's serum drug level. The compiled serum concentrations and the C/D ratios can support the physician's decision when individualizing dosing and determining treatment strategies for a specific patient.

A review of a recently published guidelines' "strong recommendation" for therapeutic drug monitoring of olanzapine, haloperidol, perphenazine, and fluphenazine

Introduction

In addition to clozapine, there is a growing body of evidence that supports therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for additional antipsychotics commonly used in the United States.

Methods

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Neuropsychopharmakologie und Pharmakopsychiatrie (AGNP) published TDM guidelines for several psychiatric medications. Sources were identified that the authors used to establish therapeutic reference ranges for haloperidol, fluphenazine, perphenazine, and olanzapine-4 antipsychotics commonly used in the United States with a "strong recommendation" for TDM. The sources were then reviewed for content and appropriateness for utilization in establishing the reference ranges.

Results

Olanzapine had 15 citations, haloperidol had 9, perphenazine had 4, and fluphenazine had 2. The studies' methods were reviewed along with the proposed therapeutic reference ranges.

Discussion

Several limitations of the guidelines were identified. Reference ranges were suggested based on studies of patients with various diagnoses; some patients had an acute exacerbation, and others were in a maintenance phase. An additional publication was identified that reviewed similar (and additional) TDM studies; those conclusions were in slight contrast with those of the AGNP guidelines. In the future, guidance should be given to those looking to conduct TDM studies to standardize methods and make meta-analysis of this data more feasible.

Schizophrenia: recent advances in LC-MS/MS methods to determine antipsychotic drugs in biological samples

Schizophrenia is one of the most debilitating and costly illnesses worldwide. First-generation antipsychotics such as chlorpromazine and haloperidol succeeded in controlling the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but had significant extrapyramidal effects that led to the search for new agents and the release of second-generation (or atypical) antipsychotics. These drugs had a lower risk of adverse motor symptoms. Therapeutic drug monitoring has become a useful tool to optimize schizophrenia treatment and HPLC-MS/MS has been considered the primary technique to monitor antipsychotics. This review comprises three sections: schizophrenia pathophysiology and treatment; recent advances in LC-MS/MS methods designed to measure levels of antipsychotics and their metabolites in plasma samples (selectivity, matrix effect and sensitivity); and the importance of therapeutic drug monitoring.

[Polypharmacy of psychotropic drugs in child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany - rather the rule than the exception]

Polypharmacy of psychotropic drugs in child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany - rather the rule than the exception Abstract. Background: Polypharmacy increases the risk of interactions and enhances the chance of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Hence, child and adolescent psychiatrists generally try to avoid polypharmacy with psychotropic drugs. However, only little data regarding the frequency of polypharmacy in child and adolescent psychiatry are available. This study analyzes clinical data on polypharmacy and the possible association with a higher risk of ADRs in Germany, with a focus on antidepressants and antipsychotics. Methods: We investigated a total of 940 datasets from descriptive studies on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of pediatric patients treated with different psychotropic drugs. Results: The frequency of polypharmacy ranged up to 45.6 % (escitalopram) and 72.1 % (olanzapine). In 17.4 % of the cases, polypharmacy consisted of four or more psycho-/neuropharmacological substances. No increased incidence of ADRs was reported with polypharmacy of antipsychotics compared to monotherapy. Polypharmacy with sertraline was associated with a higher number of ADRs. Discussion and Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of polypharmacy with psychotropic drugs in child and adolescent psychiatry in Germany. Conclusions concerning individual drugs should be drawn with care since the subsample sizes were relatively small. However, our results do provide an indication of the prevalence of polypharmacy, although the validity of the data is limited. There is an urgent need to analyze data from larger and more homogeneous groups under more controlled conditions.

Intraindividual and Interindividual Variability of Olanzapine Trough Concentrations in Patients Treated With the Long-Acting Injectable Formulation

BACKGROUND

A long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation of olanzapine has been developed as an alternative to oral regimens. A therapeutic range of 20 to 80 ng/mL for oral olanzapine trough concentrations has been proposed. Here, we sought to investigate the intraindividual and interindividual variability of olanzapine concentrations with time in patients on maintenance therapy with the LAI formulation carried out in the routine clinical practice.

METHODS

To address this issue, we carried out a retrospective analysis of therapeutic drug monitoring of olanzapine concentrations in 21 schizophrenic patients on maintenance LAI olanzapine. Drug concentrations were correlated with LAI olanzapine doses, duration of treatment, and main clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty percent of the patients had olanzapine trough concentrations lower than 20 ng/mL. Only drug doses significantly correlated with olanzapine exposure. Mean interindividual and intraindividual coefficients of variations of olanzapine concentrations were 56% (range, 21%-97%) and 34% (range, 15%-69%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We have documented that, in a real-life setting, a large proportion of patients treated with olanzapine LAI had drug trough concentrations of less than 20 ng/mL; wide intraindividual and interindividual variability of olanzapine concentrations has been also observed. Our results could provide the rationale for the design of larger prospective, concentration-controlled clinical trials specifically designed with the goal to identify ad hoc therapeutic ranges of drug concentrations for olanzapine LAI.

Prescribing antipsychotics for children and adolescents

The prescription of antipsychotic medication in children and adolescents (<18 years of age) has increased immensely for a wide range of disorders including psychoses, bipolar disorder, conduct disorder, pervasive developmental disorder and obsessive–compulsive disorder. This has led to some concerns particularly as the evidence base in some areas is not strong, and antipsychotic medication – both first generation (FGA) and second generation (SGA) – is associated with considerable side-effects. Evidence from an increasing number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) points to therapeutic efficacy with moderate to large effect sizes. However, some RCTs have a small number of participants, are of short duration, and many are industry funded. The use of antipsychotics alongside psychosocial interventions can be recommended in certain disorders, provided there is continued, careful monitoring. It is important to note, however, that for many conditions the use of antipsychotics is not licensed in the UK.

Therapeutic drug levels of second generation antipsychotics in youth: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

In children and adolescents, the prevalence rate of mental illness is claimed to be as high as 10-20%. Effective pharmacological treatments are available for use in children, adolescents, and adults; however, most of what is known about the effects of these treatments has been confirmed in clinical studies involving adults only. Second generation antipsychotic drugs (SGAs) are the most common class of antipsychotic medication used in pediatric populations, and these drugs are increasingly being used for disorders other than psychosis. Many SGAs are routinely used in pediatric care, and the vast majority of use in this population is off label. Children, adolescents, and adults differ in age, weight, height, and metabolism, which may lead to pharmacokinetic differences in how drugs ultimately affect target tissues. The aim of this review is to summarize and evaluate the literature that investigated blood plasma levels of SGAs in youth.

METHODS

Plasma levels were assessed in relation to their administered dose, indication, and therapeutic range (if known). Studies were limited to those evaluating oral administration only. A systematic electronic database search for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2013 was conducted. Twenty-one articles were included in the review. Additional articles for discussion were also included throughout the article.

RESULTS

The only SGA that may require routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in youth given the current body of research is clozapine. Highly variable results were seen in studies of aripiprazole, olanzapine, and risperidone, indicating that more research is needed on plasma levels with these drugs. Quetiapine maintained a similar profile to that found in adults, with no dosage adjustments or indications of TDM.

CONCLUSION

TDM may be indicated in any circumstance in which cytochrome P450 inhibitors or inducers are coprescribed. Further research is required for establishing a sounder safety profile for SGA use in the pediatric population.

Weight gain and increase of body mass index among children and adolescents treated with antipsychotics: a critical review

We performed an updated review of the available literature on weight gain and increase of body mass index (BMI) among children and adolescents treated with antipsychotic medications. A PubMed search was conducted specifying the following MeSH terms: (antipsychotic agents) hedged with (weight gain) or (body mass index). We selected 127 reports, including 71 intervention trials, 42 observational studies and 14 literature reviews. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), in comparison with first-generation antipsychotics, are associated with a greater risk for antipsychotic-induced weight gain although this oversimplification should be clarified by distinguishing across different antipsychotic drugs. Among SGAs, olanzapine appears to cause the most significant weight gain, while ziprasidone seems to cause the least. Antipsychotic-induced BMI increase appears to remain regardless of the specific psychotropic co-treatment. Children and adolescents seem to be at a greater risk than adults for antipsychotic-induced weight gain; and the younger the child, the higher the risk. Genetic or environmental factors related to antipsychotic-induced weight gain among children and adolescents are mostly unknown, although certain genetic factors related to serotonin receptors or hormones such as leptin, adiponectin or melanocortin may be involved. Strategies to reduce this antipsychotic side effect include switching to another antipsychotic drug, lowering the dosage or initiating treatment with metformin or topiramate, as well as non-pharmacological interventions. Future research should avoid some methodological limitations such as not accounting for age- and sex-adjusted BMI (zBMI), small sample size, short period of treatment, great heterogeneity of diagnoses and confounding by indication.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of atypical antipsychotics in children and adolescents

Pediatric behavioral and affective disorders often require antipsychotic therapy, in combination with psychotherapeutic interventions, for their treatment and stabilization. Although pharmacotherapy can include either typical or atypical antipsychotics, the latter are generally preferred because of their apparently lower risk of adverse effects. Recent controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of some of these agents (including aripiprazole, clozapine, olanzapine, paliperidone, quetiapine, risperidone, ziprasidone) in adolescent schizophrenia and children or adolescent bipolar mania, or to treat severe aggression and self-injury in the context of autism in children and adolescents. Although few studies have systematically monitored their short- and, more importantly, long-term safety, current evidence indicates that sedation, hyperprolactinemia, and metabolic abnormalities such as excess weight gain, diabetes, and related cardiovascular effects were clinically relevant adverse effects in young patients, with the individual agents differing in their propensity to induce these effects. When prescribing antipsychotics for children and adolescents, physicians should therefore be aware of the specific adverse effect profiles and patients should be closely monitored for the short- and long-term development of adverse events. In pediatric patients, the starting dose, titration plan, and maintenance dose of antipsychotics must be based on their pharmacokinetics and metabolism, as in adults. Because there are significant individual differences in drug and active metabolite(s) pharmacokinetics and metabolism, which may be further affected by a number of confounding factors (including demographic variables, phenotype and drug interactions), therapeutic drug monitoring may be a valid tool for individualizing dosage, but its interpretation should also take account of changes in pharmacodynamic sensitivity with the development during childhood and adolescence.

Variability in the efficacy of psychopharmaceuticals: contributions from pharmacogenomics, ethnopsychopharmacology, and psychological and psychiatric anthropologies

Psychological and psychiatric anthropology have long questioned the universality of psychiatric diagnoses, bringing to light the fluidity of mental disorder, and recognizing that the experience and expression of psychopathology is influenced by complex and interacting genetic, environmental, and cultural factors. The majority of our discussions, however, have remained centered around the role of culture in shaping mental illness: drawing attention to subjective experiences of mental illness and culturally patterned modes of symptom presentation, and interrogating the cogency of universal diagnostic rubrics. Psychological and psychiatric anthropology have yet to robustly engage the broadly assumed universal validity of psychiatric medications and the ways in which they are prescribed and experienced. This article provides an introduction into the fields of pharmacogenomics and ethnopsychopharmacology, areas of inquiry seeking to understand the ways in which genetic variability occurring between, and within, large population groups influences individual ability to metabolize psychotropic medications. This piece further addresses the complex issue of psychopharmaceutical efficacy, stressing the ways in which, just as with psychopathology, medications and their outcomes are likewise influenced by the complex interactions of genes, environment, and culture. Lastly, ways in which anthropology can and should engage with the growing fields of pharmacogenomics and ethnopsychopharmacology are suggested.

Aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole plasma concentrations and clinical responses in patients with schizophrenia

Aripiprazole is widely used to treat schizophrenia. Plasma levels of aripiprazole and its active metabolite dehydroaripiprazole and their clinical responses in patients were explored. Forty-five (male/female: 19/26) patients with schizophrenia were treated with aripiprazole after a washout period of at least 3 days. There was no concomitant psychotropic except benzodiazepines for insomnia. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to measure the clinical response at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Blood was drawn at week 6 to measure the plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole. Patients with a PANSS score that decreased by more than 20% were defined as responders after 6 weeks of treatment. There was no difference in baseline PANSS scores or the daily dosage used between responders (n = 28) and nonresponders (n = 17) (15.0 ± 5.9 vs 12.9 ± 6.9 mg, respectively; P = 0.203). The responders showed a trend toward a higher plasma concentration of aripiprazole than nonresponders (234.4 ± 156.7 vs 163.5 ± 77.2 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.117) and a significantly higher plasma concentration of dehydroaripiprazole (101.6 ± 58.0 vs 66.0 ± 48.4, respectively; P = 0.023). Higher plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and its active metabolite dehydroaripiprazole were noted in responders than nonresponders. Compared with Western patients, Oriental patients had higher plasma concentrations of aripiprazole and dehydroaripiprazole at the same dose. We suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring of aripiprazole will help improve the response in clinical practice.

[Aripiprazole use in children and adolescent psychiatric patients]

Aripiprazole inaugurates a new generation of antipsychotics called dopamine-serotonin system stabilizers. Its mechanism of action is different as aripiprazole is a partial dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist and 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist. Therefore, aripiprazole is thought to have an antagonistic action in the mesolimbic pathway but an agonistic action in the mesocortical pathway, tending to normalize the dopaminergic transmission regardless of the type of imbalance. Clinical trials involving children and adolescents have demonstrated the efficacy of aripiprazole in bipolar disorders, schizophrenia, mood disorders associated with pervasive developmental disorders, in tics and Tourette's. The most frequent side effects are extrapyramidal symptoms and sleepiness and are dose-dependent. Nevertheless, contrary to other second-generation antipsychotics available in France, it induces little weight gain, does not modify lipid and glucidic profiles, does not increase prolactin levels, or induce QTc lengthening. The main advantage of aripiprazole is its good safety profile, with different toxicity targets to other second-generation antipsychotics available in France. Aripiprazole appears to be an alternative for children and adolescents who are vulnerable to these side effects and are having trouble coping with them.

Olanzapine approved for the acute treatment of schizophrenia or manic/mixed episodes associated with bipolar I disorder in adolescent patients

BACKGROUND

Severe and persistent mental illnesses in children and adolescents, such as early- onset schizophrenia spectrum (EOSS) disorders and pediatric bipolar disorder (pedBP), are increasingly recognized. Few treatments have demonstrated efficacy in rigorous clinical trials. Enduring response to current medications appears limited. Recently, olanzapine was approved for the treatment of adolescents with schizophrenia or acute manic/mixed episodes in pedBP.

METHODS

PubMed searches were conducted for olanzapine combined with pharmacology, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. Searches related to schizophrenia and bipolar disorder were limited to children and adolescents. The bibliographies of the retrieved articles were hand-checked for additional relevant studies. The epidemiology, phenomenology, and treatment of EOSS and pedBP, and olanzapine's pharmacology are reviewed. Studies of olanzapine treatment in youth with EOSS and pedBP are examined.

RESULTS

Olanzapine is efficacious for EOSS and pedBP. However, olanzapine is not more efficacious than risperidone, molindone, or haloperidol in EOSS and is less efficacious than clozapine in treatment-resistant EOSS. No comparative trials have been done in pedBP. Olanzapine is associated with weight gain, dyslipidemia, and transaminase elevations in youth. Extrapyramidal symptoms, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, and blood dyscrasias have also been reported but appear rare.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that olanzapine should be considered a second-line agent in EOSS and pedBP due to its risks for significant weight gain and lipid dysregulation. Awareness of the consistent weight and metabolic changes observed in olanzapine-treated youth focused attention on the potential long-term risks of atypical antipsychotics in youth.

Carriers of the UGT1A4 142T>G gene variant are predisposed to reduced olanzapine exposure--an impact similar to male gender or smoking in schizophrenic patients

PURPOSE

The impact of the UGT1A4, CYP1A2, and MDR1 genetic variants on olanzapine plasma levels, in relation to those of other individual factors, such as gender, smoking status, body weight, and age, was investigated in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

A total of 121 patients were recruited from psychosis-specialized outpatient departments in Stockholm County. Olanzapine plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Genotyping was carried out by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism or minisequencing, and haplotypes were analyzed using specialized computer software on population genetics. Multiple regression analysis was performed to investigate the combined effect of patient characteristics and genotypes/haplotypes on daily dose-corrected plasma concentrations of olanzapine.

RESULTS

In addition to , the results indicate that inter-patient differences in olanzapine exposure were explained by the known factor of time of sampling from last dose intake and by the following individual factors in order of relative impact: (1) male gender, (2) carrier of the UGT1A4 142T>G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and (3) smoking. Each of these three factors predicted a decrease in daily dose-corrected plasma concentrations of 35, 25, and 21%, respectively. In contrast, age, body weight, and MDR1 or CYP1A2 haplotype did not have a significant impact.

CONCLUSIONS

At 12 h after dose intake, the regression model predicted a 5.1-fold higher olanzapine plasma level in a non-smoking female patient who did not carry the UGT1A4 142T>G SNP compared to a smoking man treated with the same dose but heterozygous for UGT1A4 142T>G SNP. Whether these combined genetic and environmental factors influence the risk of therapeutic failure remains to be established.

Aripiprazole in the treatment of early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorder: A case series in Korean children and adolescents

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this case series was to assess the effectiveness and tol-erability of aripiprazole in Korean children and adolescents with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum (EOSS) disorder.

METHODS

The medical records of aripiprazole-treated patients with EOSS were retrospectively reviewed. Changes in illness severity were measured using the Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scales.

RESULTS

Data from 22 children and adolescents were included (12 girls, 10 boys; mean [SD] age, 14.0 [2.4] years). The mean (SD) dosage of aripiprazole was 19.8 (9.4) mg/d (median, 18.7 mg/d; mode, 15, 30 mg/d), and the range of treatment duration was 21 to 838 days. Mean (SD) CGI-S score improved significantly from baseline to end point (from 5.7 [0.7] to 4.3 [1.4]; P < 0.001). Based on changes in chart-extracted CGI-I scores, significantly greater improvement was associated with negative symptoms compared with positive symptoms (U = 25.5; P = 0.028; r = -0.47). Aripiprazole was discontinued due to insufficient effect in 5 patients (22.7%) and treatment-emergent adverse events in 3 patients (13.6%).

CONCLUSION

The results from this small study suggest that aripiprazole was moderately effective in reducing psychotic symptoms in these Korean children and adolescents with EOSS.