Limited Sampling Model for Advanced Mycophenolic Acid Therapeutic Drug Monitoring After Liver Transplantation

Model-informed precision dosing: State of the art and future perspectives

Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) stands as a significant development in personalized medicine to tailor drug dosing to individual patient characteristics. MIPD moves beyond traditional therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) by integrating mathematical predictions of dosing, and considering patient-specific factors (patient characteristics, drug measurements) as well as different sources of variability. For this purpose, rigorous model qualification is required for the application of MIPD in patients. This review delves into new methods in model selection and validation, also highlighting the role of machine learning in improving MIPD, the utilization of biosensors for real-time monitoring, as well as the potential of models integrating biomarkers for efficacy or toxicity for precision dosing. The clinical evidence of TDM and MIPD is discussed for various medical fields including infection medicine, oncology, transplant medicine, and inflammatory bowel diseases, thereby underscoring the role of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics and specific biomarkers. Further research, particularly randomized clinical trials, is warranted to corroborate the value of MIPD in enhancing patient outcomes and advancing personalized medicine.

Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate in patients treated for interstitial lung disease (EVER-ILD study)

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has been used to treat interstitial lung disease (ILD), but mycophenolate (MPA) pharmacokinetics was not reported for this use. This ancillary study of the EVER-ILD protocol aimed at describing the pharmacokinetic variability of MPA using population modelling in ILD.

METHODS

Concentrations of MPA were measured during an 8-h course for 27 ILD patients treated with 1000 mg MMF b.i.d. Absorption, distribution and elimination of MPA were described using population compartment models with first-order transfer and elimination rate constants, while accounting for both absorption peaks using gamma absorption models.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of MPA was best described using a two-compartment model and two gamma absorption models, model performances of this model were still similar to those of a one gamma absorption model. This pharmacokinetics seemed to be notably influenced by body weight, renal function and inflammatory status. The distribubtion value area under the concentration curve between two administrations of MMF was AUC12 = 52.5 mg.h/L in median (interquartile range: 42.2-58.0 mg.h/L).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study reporting MPA pharmacokinetics in ILD. This pharmacokinetics appears to be similar to other indications and should be further investigated in future studies.

An open-label randomised-controlled trial of azathioprine vs. mycophenolate mofetil for the induction of remission in treatment-naive autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) almost invariably require lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. There is genuine concern about the efficacy and tolerability of the current standard combination therapy of prednisolone and azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to compare MMF to azathioprine as induction therapy for AIH.

METHODS

In this 24-week, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre superiority trial, 70 patients with treatment-naive AIH received either MMF or azathioprine, both in combination with prednisolone. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission defined as normalisation of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and IgG after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (mean 57.9 years [SD 14.0]; 72.9% female) were randomly assigned to the MMF plus prednisolone (n = 39) or azathioprine plus prednisolone (n = 31) group. The primary endpoint was met in 56.4% and 29.0% of patients assigned to the MMF group and the azathioprine group, respectively (difference, 27.4 percentage points; 95% CI 4.0 to 46.7; p = 0.022). The MMF group exhibited higher complete biochemical response rates at 6 months (72.2% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in patients who received MMF (0%) but serious adverse events were reported in four patients who received azathioprine (12.9%) (p = 0.034). Two patients in the MMF group (5.1%) and eight patients in the azathioprine group (25.8%) discontinued treatment owing to adverse events or serious adverse events (p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with treatment-naive AIH, MMF with prednisolone led to a significantly higher rate of biochemical remission at 24 weeks compared to azathioprine combined with prednisolone. Azathioprine use was associated with more (serious) adverse events leading to cessation of treatment, suggesting superior tolerability of MMF.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

This randomised-controlled trial directly compares azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, both in combination with prednisolone, for the induction of biochemical remission in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Achieving complete remission is desirable to prevent disease progression. Patients assigned to the mycophenolate mofetil group reached biochemical remission more often and experienced fewer adverse events. The findings in this trial may contribute to the re-evaluation of international guidelines for the standard of care in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

#NCT02900443.

Volumetric microsampling for simultaneous remote immunosuppressant and kidney function monitoring in outpatient kidney transplant recipients

AIMS

Immunosuppressant and kidney function monitoring are crucial for kidney transplant recipient follow-up. Microsamples enable remote sampling and minimise patient burden as compared to conventional venous sampling at the clinic. We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay to quantify tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid (MPA), creatinine and iohexol in dried blood spot (DBS), and volumetric absorptive microsample (VAMS) samples.

METHODS

The assay was successfully validated analytically for all analytes. Clinical validation was conducted by direct comparison of paired DBS, VAMS and venous reference samples from 25 kidney transplant recipients. Patients received iohexol 5-15 minutes before immunosuppressant intake and were sampled 0, 1, 2 and 3 hours thereafter, enabling tacrolimus and MPA area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and creatinine-based and iohexol-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation. Method agreement was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis and the percentages of values within 15-30% of the reference (P₁₅ -P₃₀ ) with a P₂₀ acceptance threshold of 80%.

RESULTS

For DBS samples, method agreement was excellent for tacrolimus trough concentrations (n = 25, P₁₅  = 92.0%) and AUCs (n = 25; P₂₀  = 95.8%) and adequate for creatinine-based GFR trend monitoring (n = 25; P₂₀  = 80%). DBS-based MPA AUC assessment showed suboptimal agreement (n = 16; P₂₀  = 68.8%), but was considered acceptable given its P₃₀ of 100%. The assay performed inadequately for DBS-based iohexol GFR determination (n = 24; P₂₀  = 75%). The VAMS technique generally showed inferior performance, but can be considered for certain situations.

CONCLUSION

The assay was successfully validated for tacrolimus, MPA and creatinine quantification in DBS samples, enabling simultaneous remote kidney function trend monitoring and immunosuppressant therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney transplant recipients.

Recent lessons learned from population pharmacokinetic studies of mycophenolic acid: physiological, genomic, and drug interactions leading to the prediction of drug effects

INTRODUCTION

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is a widely used immunosuppressant in transplantation and autoimmune disease. Highly variable pharmacokinetics have been observed with MPA, but the exact mechanisms remain largely unknown.

AREAS COVERED

The current review provided a critical, comprehensive update of recently published population pharmacokinetic/dynamic models of MPA (n=16 papers identified from PubMed and Embase, inclusive from January 2017 to August 2021), with specific emphases on the intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing the pharmacology of MPA. The significance of the identified covariates, potential mechanisms, and comparisons to historical literature have been provided.

EXPERT OPINION

While select covariates affecting the population pharmacokinetics of MPA are consistently observed and mechanistically supported, some variables have not been regularly reported and/or lacked mechanistic explanation. Very few pharmacodynamic models were available, pointing to the need to extrapolate pharmacokinetic findings. Ideal models of MPA should consist of: i) utilizing optimal sampling points to allow the characterizations of absorption, re-absorption, and elimination phases; ii) characterizing unbound/total MPA, MPA metabolites, plasma/urinary concentrations, and genetic polymorphisms to facilitate mechanistic interpretations; and iii) incorporating actual outcomes and pharmacodynamic data to establish clinical relevance. We anticipate the field will continue to expand in the next 5 to 10 years.

Estimation of Mycophenolic Acid Exposure in Heart Transplant Recipients by Population Pharmacokinetic and Limited Sampling Strategies

Purpose: The aim of this study is i) to establish a strategy to estimate the area under the curve of the dosing interval (AUC0-12h) of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in the heart transplant recipients and ii) to find the covariates that significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of MPA exposure. Methods: This single-center, prospective, open-label, observational study was conducted in 91 adult heart transplant recipients orally taking mycophenolate mofetil dispersible tablets. Samples collected intensively and sparsely were analyzed by the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique, and all the data were used in PPK modeling. Potential covariates were tested stepwise. The goodness-of-fit plots, the normalized prediction distribution error, and prediction-corrected visual predictive check were used for model evaluation. Optimal sampling times by ED-optimal strategy and multilinear regression (MLR) were analyzed based on the simulated data by the final PPK model. Moreover, using intensive data from 14 patients, the accuracy of AUC0-12h estimation was evaluated by Passing-Bablok regression analysis and Bland-Alman plots for both the PPK model and MLR equation. Results: A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination with a lag time was chosen as the structure model. Co-medication of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and albumin (ALB) were found to significantly affect bioavailability (F), clearance of central compartment (CL/F), and the distribution volume of the central compartment (V2/F), respectively. Co-medication of PPIs decreased F by 27.6%. When eGFR decreased by 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, CL/F decreased by 23.7%. However, the impact of ALB on V2/F was limited to MPA exposure. The final model showed an adequate fitness of the data. The optimal sampling design was pre-dose and 1 and 4 h post-dose for pharmacokinetic estimation. The best-fit linear equation was finally established as follows: AUC0-12h = 3.539 × C0 + 0.288 × C0.5 + 1.349 × C1 + 6.773 × C4.5. Conclusion: A PPK model was established with three covariates in heart transplant patients. Co-medication of PPIs and eGFR had a remarkable impact on AUC0-12h of MPA. A linear equation was also concluded with four time points as an alternative way to estimate AUC0-12h for MPA.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs in hepatology and gastroenterology

Immunosuppressive drugs have been key to the success of liver transplantation and are essential components of the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). For many but not all immunosuppressants, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is recommended to guide therapy. In this article, the rationale and evidence for TDM of tacrolimus, mycophenolic acid, the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and azathioprine in liver transplantation, IBD, and AIH is reviewed. New developments, including algorithm-based/computer-assisted immunosuppressant dosing, measurement of immunosuppressants in alternative matrices for whole blood, and pharmacodynamic monitoring of these agents is discussed. It is expected that these novel techniques will be incorporate into the standard TDM in the next few years.

Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology

ABSTRACT

When mycophenolic acid (MPA) was originally marketed for immunosuppressive therapy, fixed doses were recommended by the manufacturer. Awareness of the potential for a more personalized dosing has led to development of methods to estimate MPA area under the curve based on the measurement of drug concentrations in only a few samples. This approach is feasible in the clinical routine and has proven successful in terms of correlation with outcome. However, the search for superior correlates has continued, and numerous studies in search of biomarkers that could better predict the perfect dosage for the individual patient have been published. As it was considered timely for an updated and comprehensive presentation of consensus on the status for personalized treatment with MPA, this report was prepared following an initiative from members of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology (IATDMCT). Topics included are the criteria for analytics, methods to estimate exposure including pharmacometrics, the potential influence of pharmacogenetics, development of biomarkers, and the practical aspects of implementation of target concentration intervention. For selected topics with sufficient evidence, such as the application of limited sampling strategies for MPA area under the curve, graded recommendations on target ranges are presented. To provide a comprehensive review, this report also includes updates on the status of potential biomarkers including those which may be promising but with a low level of evidence. In view of the fact that there are very few new immunosuppressive drugs under development for the transplant field, it is likely that MPA will continue to be prescribed on a large scale in the upcoming years. Discontinuation of therapy due to adverse effects is relatively common, increasing the risk for late rejections, which may contribute to graft loss. Therefore, the continued search for innovative methods to better personalize MPA dosage is warranted.

Population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid in paediatric patients

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is widely used in paediatric kidney transplant patients and sometimes prescribed for additional indications. Population pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic modelling has been frequently used to characterize the fixed, random and covariate effects of MPA in adult patients. However, MPA population pharmacokinetic data in the paediatric population have not been systematically summarized. The objective of this narrative review was to provide an up-to-date critique of currently available paediatric MPA population pharmacokinetic models, with emphases on modelling techniques, pharmacological findings and clinical relevance. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception of database to May 2020, where a total of 11 studies have been identified representing kidney transplant (n = 4), liver transplant (n = 1), haematopoietic stem cell transplant (n = 1), idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (n = 2), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 2), and a combined population consisted of kidney, liver and haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients (n = 1). Critical analyses were provided in the context of MPA absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and bioavailability in this paediatric database. Comparisons to adult patients were also provided. With respect to clinical utility, Bayesian estimation models (n = 6) with acceptable accuracy and precision for MPA exposure determination have also been identified and systematically evaluated. Overall, our analyses have identified unique features of MPA clinical pharmacology in the paediatric population, while recognizing several gaps that still warrant further investigations. This review can be used by pharmacologists and clinicians for improving MPA pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling and patient care.

Assessment of pharmacokinetic mycophenolic acid clearance models using Monte Carlo numerical analysis

Previously, we performed population pharmacokinetic analysis and indicated age, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) daily dose, and presence of nifedipine in patient therapy as significant predictors of MPA apparent clearance (CL/F) variability. This study aimed to determine the reliability of previously published population pharmacokinetic models derived from similar studies. Furthermore, this study investigated correspondence between chosen population models from the literature.By means of the Monte Carlo simulation method, pharmacokinetic models from different studies are simulated and analysed in the range of standard deviations of measured system parameters as well as the range of observed model parameters taken from the comparison studies.The 1000 numerical simulations were performed for every analysed model in order to calculate the most possible MPA CL/F values according to the expected values from the performed experiment. Fitting our results with other models showed how the presence of nifedipine makes difference in MPA CL/F values.By testing the data from selected studies into our model, a similar range of expected CL/F values was obtained, which may confirm the validity of our model. The results of our population pharmacokinetic study are partially applicable in models by other researchers.

Real life experience of mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy following liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial due to a risk of acute rejection. The aim of this study was to report the largest multicenter experience of the use a MMF monotherapy guided by therapeutic drug monitoring using pharmacoslope modeling and Bayesian estimations of the MPA inter-dose AUC (_BEAUC^MPA) before withdrawing calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and to evaluate the benefit of MMF monotherapy.

METHODS

MMF daily doses were adjusted to reach the _BEAUC^MPA target of 45μg.h/mL. Then CNI were withdrawn and patients were followed on liver test and clinical outcomes.

MAIN FINDINGS

From 2000-2014, in 2 transplantation centers, 94 liver transplant recipients received MMF monotherapy 6.5±4 years after LT. The mean _BEAUC^MPA was 45.5±16μg.h/mL. During follow-up, 4 patients experienced acute rejection (4%). During the first year, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improved from 46.2±10.5 to 49.1±11.5mL/kg/min (P=0.025). Benefit persisted at year 5. In patients with metabolic syndrome, eGFR did not improve.

CONCLUSION

MMF monotherapy regimen appears usually safe and beneficial, with low risk of acute rejection and eGFR improvement. Therapeutic drug monitoring strategy seemed useful by identifying 14% of patients with low MMF exposure.

Prediction of Free from Total Mycophenolic Acid Concentrations in Stable Renal Transplant Patients: A Population-Based Approach

BACKGROUND

A population pharmacokinetic (PK) protein-binding model was developed to (1) predict free mycophenolic acid (fMPA) based on total MPA (tMPA) concentrations in renal transplant patients, to establish the therapeutic range of fMPA through pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies; and (2) provide a guideline for dosing mycophenolate mofetil (MMF).

METHODS

Full PK profiles of 56 patients (from five different occasions) during the first year after transplantation who were treated with oral MMF and cyclosporine, or macrolides (either tacrolimus or sirolimus), were analysed. fMPA protein-binding was modelled using nonlinear mixed effects modelling (NONMEM). The influence of physiological factors and coadministered immunosupressant was studied.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination, linear protein binding and enterohepatic circulation (EHC) best described the PK of MPA. Different recycling rate constants were considered depending on the coadministered immunosuppressant. The protein-binding rate constant (K_B [relative standard error, RSE%]) increased nonlinearly with renal function according to K _B = 43.1 (3.13)·(CL_CR/59.51)^0.394(10.66) h^-1. Furthermore, fMPA plasma clearance, given by clearance of the free mycophenolic acid (CL_fMPA), CL_fMPA = 410 (RSE%3.00)·(1+CsA·0.594 (22.39)) L/h, was 59.4% greater in cyclosporine-treated patients than in macrolide-treated patients, leading to lower MPA exposures. External evaluation proved acceptable area under the plasma concentration-time curve and trough concentration predictions.

CONCLUSIONS

A reliable protein-binding population PK model was developed for prediction of fMPA or tMPA from each other and for dose guiding in stable renal transplant recipients.

Generics in transplantation medicine: Randomized comparison of innovator and substitution products containing mycophenolate mofetil

Objective: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely used as an immunosuppressant for the prophylaxis of acute organ rejection in recipients of solid organ transplants. Materials and methods: We have compared, in healthy subjects, the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid when MMF was administered in the form of the innovator product CellCept (F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.) or one of three commercially available generics, Renodapt (Biocon Ltd.), Mycept (Panacea Biotec), or Cellmune (Cipla Ltd.). The study was powered to detect a 20% difference in mean formulation performance measures, but not to formally evaluate bioequivalence. Geometric mean ratios of maximum concentrations (C_max) and areas under plasma concentration-time curves were calculated. Results: Comparing generics against each other, the differences in point estimates of the geometric mean ratios of C_max of two of the comparisons were either borderline within (Renodapt/Cellmune) or clearly outside (Mycept/Cellmune) a region of 80 – 125% around the reference mean, indicating that bioequivalence between these generics may be difficult to show. Conclusion: Physicians in the field of transplantation should be aware of the potential risk of altering the therapeutic outcome when switching from one preparation of MMF to another. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02981290.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid: An Update

The most recent comprehensive reviews on the population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) were published in 2014. Since then, several population pharmacokinetic studies on MPA have been published. The majority of literature is still focused on the kidney transplant population, although studies have also been conducted in liver and lung transplantation, autoimmune diseases, and hematopoietic stem cell transplant. While the majority of the model building is still based on parametric non-linear mixed-effects modeling, recent studies suggest the suitability of other methodologies. Additionally, instead of just focusing on pharmacokinetic modeling, a trend toward describing the relationships between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters is observed. Given the importance of enterohepatic recirculation (EHR) in the pharmacokinetics of MPA, more authors have attempted to characterize this process in their models. Overall, the recent models have become more sophisticated and incorporate EHR, pharmacodynamic relationships, and metabolites while maintaining many of the population values and covariates identified previously. However, the number of MPA population pharmacokinetic models describing the enteric-coated formulation of MPA (EC-MPA) is still limited. Given the increasing use of EC-MPA, more studies are needed to fill this literature gap. In addition, few studies are yet available characterizing free MPA concentration or MPA metabolites. Given the extensive protein binding, low to intermediate extraction, and intrinsic clearance characteristics of MPA in humans, including these variables would improve the population structural models.

Impact of SLCO1B3 polymorphisms on clinical outcomes in lung allograft recipients receiving mycophenolic acid

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in mycophenolic acid (MPA) metabolism have been shown to contribute to variable MPA exposure, but their clinical effects are unclear. We aimed to determine if SNPs in key genes in MPA metabolism affect outcomes after lung transplantation. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 275 lung transplant recipients, 228 receiving mycophenolic acid and a control group of 47 receiving azathioprine. Six SNPs known to regulate MPA exposure from the SLCO, UGT and MRP2 families were genotyped. Primary outcome was 1-year survival. Secondary outcomes were 3-year survival, nonminimal (≥A2 or B2) acute rejection, and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Statistical analyses included time-to-event Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test and Cox regression modeling. We found that SLCO1B3 SNPs rs4149117 and rs7311358 were associated with decreased 1-year survival [rs7311358 HR 7.76 (1.37-44.04), p = 0.021; rs4149117 HR 7.28 (1.27-41.78), p = 0.026], increased risk for nonminimal acute rejection [rs4149117 TT334/T334G: OR 2.01 (1.06-3.81), p = 0.031; rs7311358 GG699/G699A: OR 2.18 (1.13-4.21) p = 0.019] and lower survival through 3 years for MPA patients but not for azathioprine patients. MPA carriers of either SLCO1B3 SNP had shorter survival after CLAD diagnosis (rs4149117 p = 0.048, rs7311358 p = 0.023). For the MPA patients, Cox regression modeling demonstrated that both SNPs remained independent risk factors for death. We conclude that hypofunctional SNPs in the SLCO1B3 gene are associated with an increased risk for acute rejection and allograft failure in lung transplant recipients treated with MPA.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in outpatient renal transplant recipients using a volumetric dried blood spot sampling device

AIMS

Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing after renal transplantation is individualized through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Home-based dried blood spot (DBS) sampling has the potential to replace conventional TDM sampling at the clinic. A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay was developed to quantify tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in DBS and clinically validated for abbreviated area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) monitoring using an innovative volumetric DBS sampling device.

METHODS

Clinical validation was performed by direct comparison of paired DBS and whole blood (WB) (tacrolimus) and plasma (mycophenolic acid) concentrations and AUCs. Agreement was evaluated using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman analysis and DBS-to-WB predictive performance. TDM dosing recommendations based on both methods were compared to assess clinical impact.

RESULTS

Paired tacrolimus (n = 200) and mycophenolic acid (n = 192) DBS and WB samples were collected from 65 kidney(-pancreas) transplant recipients. Differences for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid were within ±20% for 84.5% and 76.6% of concentrations and 90.5% and 90.7% of AUCs, respectively. Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid dosing recommendation differences occurred on 44.4% and 4.7% of occasions. Tacrolimus DBS dosing recommendations were 0.35 ± 0.14 mg higher than for WB and 8 ± 3% of the initial dose. Mycophenolic acid DBS dosing recommendations were 23.3 ± 31.9 mg lower than for plasma and 2 ± 3.5% of the initial dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid TDM for outpatient renal transplant recipients, based on abbreviated AUC collected with a DBS sampling device, is comparable to conventional TDM based on WB sampling. Patient training and guidance on good blood-spotting practices is essential to ensure method feasibility.

Effect of Disease Pathologies on Transporter Expression and Function

Transporters are important determinants of drug absorption, distribution, and excretion. The clinical relevance of drug transporters in drug disposition and toxicology depends on their localization in liver, kidney, and brain. There has been growing evidence regarding the importance of disease status on alterations in metabolizing enzymes and transporter proteins. This review focuses on uptake and efflux transporter proteins in liver, kidney, and brain and discusses mechanisms of altered transporter expression and function secondary to disease.