Not time to abandon use of local vaginal hormone therapies

Topical estrogens and non-hormonal preparations for postmenopausal vulvovaginal atrophy: An EMAS clinical guide

INTRODUCTION

Vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA) is a chronic condition caused by estrogen deficiency. It affects around 50% of postmenopausal women, reducing their general and sexual quality of life as well as the quality of their personal relationships.

AIM

The aim of this clinical guide is to set out an individualized approach to the management of VVA with topical estrogens and non-hormonal preparations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

An individualized approach is required for the management of VVA. Topical low-dose estrogens are effective and also alleviate urinary incontinence and prevent recurrent urinary tract infections. Women should not be denied long-term use of topical estrogens as long as they feel that this treatment is of benefit to them, because the safety data are reassuring. Non-hormonal preparations (lubricants and moisturizers) should be the first-line treatment for VVA in women taking adjuvant endocrine therapies for cancers considered to be hormone-dependent. They can be used over the long term.

A systematic review of the efficacy and safety of vaginal estrogen products for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause

OBJECTIVE

We updated a systematic review to evaluate the totality of evidence available for the efficacy and safety of vaginal estrogen products for the treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) based on published randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Library, Ovid, PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Clinicaltrials.gov for English-language articles from database inception to June 2018. Our search consolidated 2,086 potential sources to 53 full-text articles that were reviewed and found relevant to our systematic review.

RESULTS

We identified 53 studies that met the inclusion criteria that evaluated the efficacy and safety of vaginal estrogen versus placebo or other hormone and nonhormone controls. Compared with placebo, all vaginal estrogens demonstrated superiority in objective endpoints and subjective endpoints of GSM, whereas some trials demonstrated superiority versus placebo in urogenital symptoms. No significant difference was observed between various dosages and dosage forms of vaginal estrogen products. Vaginal estrogen showed superiority over vaginal lubricants and moisturizers for the improvement of objective clinical endpoints of vulvovaginal atrophy but not for subjective endpoints. Unopposed vaginal estrogens seemed safe, although studies were not powered to detect a long-term estrogenic side effect.

CONCLUSION

Estrogen products were found to be clinically effective for the treatment of GSM with doses as low as 4 μg. Vaginal estrogen products seem to be safe with few adverse effects, although there is a lack of long-term controlled clinical trial safety data. This review supports the use of commercially available vaginal estrogen therapies as an effective and safe first-line therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe GSM.

Practical Treatment Considerations in the Management of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause

Genitourinary syndrome of menopause is a condition comprising the atrophic symptoms and signs women may experience in the vulvovaginal and bladder-urethral areas as a result of the loss of sex steroids that occurs with menopause. It is a progressive condition that does not resolve without treatment and can adversely affect a woman’s quality of life. For a variety of reasons, many symptomatic women do not seek treatment and, of those who do, many are unhappy with their options. Additionally, many healthcare providers do not actively screen their menopausal patients for the symptoms of genitourinary syndrome of menopause. In this review, we discuss the clinical presentation of genitourinary syndrome of menopause as well as the treatment guidelines recommended by the major societies engaged in women’s health. This is followed by a review of available treatment options that includes both hormonal and non-hormonal therapies. We discuss both the systemic and vaginal estrogen products that have been available for decades and remain important treatment options for patients; however, a major intent of the review is to provide information on the newer, non-estrogen pharmacologic treatment options, in particular oral ospemifene and vaginal prasterone. A discussion of adjunctive therapies such as moisturizers, lubricants, physical therapy/dilators, hyaluronic acid, and laser therapy is included. We also address some of the available data on both the patient and healthcare providers perspectives on treatment, including cost, and touch briefly on the topic of treating women with a history of, or at high risk for, breast cancer.

Vaginal estrogen use and chronic disease risk in the Nurses' Health Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the associations between vaginal estrogen use and multiple health outcomes including cardiovascular disease (total myocardial infarction, stroke, and pulmonary embolism/deep vein thrombosis), cancer (total invasive, breast, endometrial, ovarian, and colorectal cancer), and hip fracture.

METHODS

We included postmenopausal women from the Nurses' Health Study (1982-2012) who were not current users of systemic hormone therapy at the start of the study or during follow-up. Vaginal estrogen use was self-reported on the biennial questionnaires. Information on incident health outcomes were self-reported and confirmed by medical records. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to model the multivariable adjusted hazard ratios and the 95% confidence intervals for vaginal estrogen use and multiple health outcomes.

RESULTS

Over 18 years of follow-up, after adjusting for covariates, risks for cardiovascular disease, cancer, and hip fracture were not different between users and nonusers of vaginal estrogen. No statistically significant increase in risk of any health outcome was observed with vaginal estrogen use. In sensitivity analyses, when we examined associations by hysterectomy status, the stratified results were generally similar to those for the total cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal estrogen use was not associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Our findings lend support to the safety of vaginal estrogen use, a highly effective treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause.

Estradiol vaginal inserts (4 µg and 10 µg) for treating moderate to severe vulvar and vaginal atrophy: a review of phase 3 safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic data

OBJECTIVE

To review safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the phase 3 REJOICE trial, which evaluated a 17β-estradiol (E2) softgel vaginal insert approved in 2018 for moderate to severe dyspareunia associated with menopausal vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA).

METHODS

REJOICE (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02253173) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which women with moderate to severe dyspareunia due to menopausal VVA received 4 µg, 10 µg or 25 µg of an E2 vaginal insert or placebo for 12 weeks. The published data for the recently approved 4 µg and 10 µg doses of the E2 vaginal insert, including four co-primary efficacy endpoints (change from baseline to week 12 in percentages of superficial and parabasal cells, vaginal pH and severity of dyspareunia), safety and PK (which included serum E2 levels measured by gas chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry), are summarized here.

RESULTS

Women were randomized to receive the E2 vaginal insert (4 µg [n = 186] or 10 µg [n = 188]; Imvexxy ^a ) or placebo (n = 187) in the modified intention-to-treat population. The E2 vaginal insert (4 µg and 10 µg) significantly improved the percentages of superficial and parabasal cells (p < .0001), vaginal pH (p < .0001), and the severity score for dyspareunia (p < .05) from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo. The recently approved E2 vaginal insert was well tolerated, with no clinically significant differences in treatment-emergent or serious adverse events versus placebo. Systemic absorption of E2 with both doses was minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

The recently FDA-approved E2 softgel vaginal insert (4 µg and 10 µg) was safe and effective over 12 weeks for treating moderate to severe dyspareunia due to menopausal VVA with minimal systemic E2 levels.