Barriers to Reconstructive Hand Surgery for Rheumatoid Arthritis in China: A Multicenter Survey of Patients and Physicians

Screening tool development for hand surgery referrals in systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients may need hand surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a screening tool for rheumatologists to identify potential candidates with systemic sclerosis for hand surgery, optimizing referrals.

METHODS

A pilot cross-sectional study from January 2015 to December 2016.

SAMPLE SIZE

51 participants.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

≥ 18 years old, meeting the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for SSc and hand impairment.

DATA COLLECTED

age, sex, race, disease duration, SSc subtypes, vasodilator use, skin thickness, finger stiffness, presence of Digital Ulcers (DU) and/or calcinosis, presence of Raynaud's Phenomenon (RP) attacks, health status and disability, disease status, pain intensity and functional status of the hands. Data were analyzed by a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Fulfillment of surgical criteria: 68.8%. The surgical group had higher scores on the HAQ-DI (1.39 vs. 0.96, p = 0.032) and CHFS (25.0 vs. 12.0, p = 0.005) questionnaires, and a higher frequency of DU (91.43% vs. 18.75%, p < 0.0010), calcinosis (60.0% vs. 0.0%, p < 0.001), use of vasodilators (100.0% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.007) and digital stiffness (28.57% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.017). The presence of DU increased the chance of surgical indication by 46.2 times (ORIC 95% = 8.23 to 259.49). The statistical model showed good accuracy (86.3%, p < 0.001), sensitivity (91.4%), and specificity (81.2%).

CONCLUSION

The presence of DU in SSc could be used as a screening feature for early identification and referral of potential candidates for hand surgery.

Low-cost procedure for deformity correction in rheumatoid hands

BACKGROUND

Surgical correction of ulnar drift of metacarpo-phalangeal joint (MPJ) due to Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is conventionally done by silicon joint arthroplasty which is expensive and may be associated with many complications. We report the outcome of low-cost autologous interpositional arthroplasty.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Five patients (8 hands, 32 arthroplasties) underwent correction of ulnar drift of MPJ by dorsal capsule interpositional arthroplasty. Results were assessed according to the degree of recovery of movement at the MPJ and correction of ulnar drift. Functional improvement was graded as excellent, good and fair. Pain alleviation was assessed by visual analogue score (VAS) score.

RESULTS

Excellent results were seen in 3 patients (5 hands, 20 arthroplasties), good in 1 patient (2 hands, 8 arthroplasties) and fair in 1 patient (1 hand, 4 arthroplasties). VAS score for pain decreased from mean preoperative 8.2/10 to 1/10. On average follow up of 1.4 years there was good hand function, no recurrence of deformities and patients were pain free.

CONCLUSION

Interpositional arthroplasty for MPJ using dorsal capsule for correction of post RA ulnar drift is a low-cost option which improves the hand function and cosmesis. Additionally, it avoids all the complications related with the use of silicon joints.