Assessing the Prevalence of Microaggressions in Plastic Surgery Training: A National Survey

Microaggression Interactions Among Healthcare Professionals, Trainees and Students in the Clinical Environment: A Mixed-Studies Review

This review aims to comprehensively consolidate and synthesize the existing body of empirical research on the perceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals, trainees, and students concerning microaggression interactions within diverse clinical settings. The review protocol was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO CRD42024546443). We employed the Joanna Briggs Institute's mixed-methods systematic review approach. Comprehensive electronic database searches were conducted across eight databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, Social Science Database, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses) from their respective inception dates up to October 1, 2023. The selection criteria included studies reporting instances of interprofessional or intra-professional microaggressions occurring in clinical environments among healthcare professionals, trainees, and students identifying as heterosexual and without disabilities. In total, 37 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in our review. Our analysis revealed three primary themes: Racial Microaggressions in the Clinical Environment, Gender Microaggressions in the Clinical Environment, and Religious Microaggressions in the Clinical Environment. Research must delve deeply into these experiences to better understand their long-term consequences, while policy initiatives should be designed to establish equitable, inclusive, and respectful healthcare environments. Collaborative endeavors bridging research and policy are paramount to dismantling barriers and nurturing an inclusive healthcare landscape.

Simulation Training to Interrupt Microaggressions

ABSTRACT

Microaggressions in health care occur frequently and negatively impact the well-being of trainees. High-realism simulation can effectively train health care providers to communicate in emotionally difficult situations. In 2023, we developed and piloted 4 simulation scenarios for pediatric residents centered on addressing microaggressions in the clinical environment that built on an existing didactic curriculum. These scenarios included single and intersecting forms of oppression including racism, sexism, ableism, ethnocentrism, and weight bias. We also trained faculty, who had no prior simulation debriefing experience, to facilitate and debrief the simulation sessions. Thirty-three residents participated and reported an increase in confidence immediately following the simulation training; this increase was sustained at 3 months. Faculty participants reported increased empathy for residents, recognition of microaggressions, and confidence facilitating conversation after microaggressions that occur both in the simulated setting and in real life. High-realism simulation holds promise as a way to bridge the gap between classroom and real-life interruption of microaggressions, a necessary skill to improve the health care environment for learners and patients.

ACOG Committee Statement No. 10: Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Disparate health outcomes and unequal access to care have long plagued many communities in the United States. Individual demographic characteristics, such as geography, income, education, and race, have been identified as critical factors when seeking to address inequitable health outcomes. To provide the best care possible, obstetrician-gynecologists should be keenly aware of the existence of and contributors to health inequities and be engaged in the work needed to eliminate racial and ethnic health inequities. Obstetrician-gynecologists should improve their understanding of the etiologies of health inequities by participating in lifelong learning to understand the roles clinician bias and personally mediated, systemic, and structural racism play in creating and perpetuating adverse health outcomes and health care experiences.

Assaults and Microaggressions Against Psychiatric Residents: Findings from a US Survey

OBJECTIVES

Psychiatric physicians may experience higher rates of assault than those in other fields. For many reasons, residents may be especially vulnerable. This study updates rates of assaults among US psychiatry residents as well as the reporting rates and emotional effects of these incidents. Little data exists to examine rates of microaggressions against psychiatry residents.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was distributed through a national residency database via a snowball-sampling approach between June and September of 2021. The questionnaire asked about experiences of verbal, physical, and sexual assaults, as well as microaggressions and their impact. Descriptive analyses of the obtained data were conducted.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 275 psychiatry residents from 29 states (63.6% women). At least one form of assault was experienced by 78.9% of participants with 74.5% experiencing verbal, 22.2% experiencing physical, and 6.2% experiencing sexual assault. At least one type of microaggression was experienced by 86.9% of trainees. Elevations in PTSD scores were seen in residents who identified as women and non-White and those physically injured or sexually assaulted. While 92.7% of residents stated their program provided training about assault, 25% of residents indicated they had no training on recognizing and responding to microaggressions.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychiatric residents experience widespread assault and microaggressions in the clinical setting but often do not report them. Due to the ubiquitous nature of these events, programs should provide training about early recognition and de-escalation techniques for agitation, responding effectively to microaggressions, and the importance of reporting events.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The number of publications on the subject of diversity, equity, and inclusion has surged in the last 5 years. However, a systematic review of this topic has not been published.

METHOD

Six top plastic surgery journals were queried from 2018 to 2023 using the search term "diversity." Methods, conclusions, and recommendations were tabulated.

RESULTS

A total of 138 publications were identified; 68 studies presented data suitable for analysis. All studies were retrospective. Currently, over 40% of plastic surgery residency applicants are women. The proportion of women in integrated plastic surgery residents is now 43%. In 2021 and 2022, the percentage of female first-year residents exceeded men. The percentage of female presenters at meetings (34%) is double the number in the workforce (17%). Twenty-five percent of academic faculty positions and 22% of program director positions are now held by women. Underrepresented minorities account for fewer than 10% of applicants to integrated plastic surgery residencies.

DISCUSSION

The proportion of Black and Hispanic applicants to integrated plastic surgery residencies (6% and 8%, respectively) mirrors the proportion of Black and Hispanic medical students (7% and 6%, respectively). Numerous recommendations have been made to increase the proportion of underrepresented minorities in plastic surgery programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The representation of women in plastic surgery has increased dramatically. A lack of Hispanics and Blacks reflects a small pool of applicants, as opposed to a "leaky pipeline."

Financial Literacy in Plastic Surgery Training: Importance and Current Status

BACKGROUND

Medical training is known to impose financial burden on trainees, which has been shown to contribute to burnout, even possibly compromising patient care. Financial literacy allows for management of financial situations affecting professional and personal life. The authors aimed to evaluate the financial status and knowledge among plastic surgery residents.

METHODS

A survey regarding finances and financial literacy of plastic surgery residents was sent to all the current accredited U.S. residency programs. The same survey was distributed internally. A descriptive analysis was performed, and multiple Fisher exact tests and a t test evaluated comparisons.

RESULTS

Eighty-six residents were included. Most trainees had a student loan (59.3%), with 22.1% having loans more than $300,000. A majority had at least one personal loan debt other than educational (51.1%). Residents with more debt were significantly less likely to pay off their balances monthly. A total of 17.4% of trainees had no plan for how to invest their retirement savings, whereas 55.8% reported not knowing how much they need to save to retire. One in five trainees did not feel prepared to manage personal finances/retirement planning after graduation, a majority had no formal personal finance education in their curriculum, and 89.5% agreed that financial literacy education would be beneficial. Our institutional data largely mirrored national data.

CONCLUSIONS

Many residents are lacking in financial knowledge, despite most having significant debt. Additional financial literacy education is needed in plastic surgery training. Curricula development at an institutional or national society level are possible paths toward a coordinated response to this need.

Challenges for Women in Hand Surgery: Our Perspective

Over recent decades, the prevalence of women in surgical subspecialties has increased. There has been a significant rise in the percentage of women entering integrated plastic surgery programs and an increase, albeit smaller, in women entering orthopedic surgery training programs. Although female membership in the American Society for Surgery of the Hand has steadily increased, women remain in the vast minority within this professional society and many others within the field of hand surgery. In addition to underrepresentation in positions of leadership, women face challenges such as imposter syndrome, bullying, unfavorable work structure for work-family balance, macro and micro-aggressions, and lack of mentors at a higher rate than their male colleagues. As awareness rises of the additional challenges that women in hand surgery face, we must directly address them to improve equity within our subspecialty.

Perceptions of Racial and Gender Microaggressions in an Academic Orthopaedic Department

Orthopaedic surgery consistently ranks last among all medical specialties in diversity and inclusion. While active efforts have recently been implemented to enact change, no study to date has explored the potential effects that social microaggressions have on an individual's career in orthopaedic surgery. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the influence of the perceived experiences of gender and race-based microaggressions on orthopaedic surgery residents, fellows, and attendings in their decision to pursue a career in orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

A 34-question institutional review board-approved, modified version of the validated Racial and Ethnic Minorities Scale and Daily Life Experiences survey was sent to a total of 84 individuals at the University of Miami (UM) Department of Orthopaedics. Responses were anonymously collected from current UM orthopaedic residents, fellows, and attendings. Survey results were analyzed for the prevalence of microaggressions in the context of sex, race, ethnicity, academic goals, daily scenarios, and department support. p-Values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-four of 84 respondents (64%) completed the survey. Female respondents experienced significantly more gender-based microaggressions than male respondents. On average, male participants disagreed that their experiences with microaggressions made them doubt their ability to pursue a career in orthopaedic surgery while female participants responded they were neutral. In comparison with their White counterparts, non-White and Hispanic ethnicity participants demonstrated a statistically significantly greater frequency of race and ethnicity-based microaggressions.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that female participants, non-White participants, and Hispanic minorities across all levels of training experience a higher frequency of microaggressions. The impact of these experiences on career decisions and goals for women and persons of color in orthopaedic surgery at this single institution is mixed. Experienced microaggressions should be further investigated as a potential barrier to recruitment and retention of under-represented minorities in orthopaedic surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Majority of Black Orthopaedic Surgeons Report Experiencing Racial Microaggressions During Their Residency Training

BACKGROUND

Orthopaedic surgery is the least-diverse surgical specialty based on race and ethnicity. To our knowledge, the impact of this lack of diversity on discriminatory or noninclusive experiences perceived by Black orthopaedic surgeons during their residency training has never been evaluated. Racial microaggressions were first defined in the 1970s as "subtle verbal, behavioral, and environmental indignities, whether intentional or unintentional, that communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative racial slights and insults to the target person or group." Although the term "microaggression" has long been established, more recently, as more workplaces aim to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion, it has entered the medical profession's lexicon as a means of describing the spectrum of racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion in the healthcare environment.

QUESTION/PURPOSES

(1) What is the extent of discrimination that is perceived by Black orthopaedic surgeons during residency? (2) What subtypes of racial microaggressions (which encompasses racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion) do Black orthopaedic surgeons experience during residency training, and who are the most common initiators of these microaggressions? (3) What feedback statements could be perceived as racially biased to Black orthopaedic surgeons in residency training? (4) Are there gender differences in the reported types of racial microaggressions recalled by Black respondents during residency training?

METHODS

An anonymous survey was administered between July 1, 2020, and September 1, 2020, to practicing orthopaedic surgeons, residents, and fellows in the J. Robert Gladden Orthopaedic Society database who self-identify as Black. There were 455 Black orthopaedic surgeons in practice and 140 Black orthopaedic residents or fellows in the database who met these criteria. Fifty-two percent (310 of 595) of participants responded. Fifty-three percent (243 of 455) were practicing surgeons and 48% (67 of 140) were current residents or fellows. Respondents reported their perception of discrimination in the residency workplace using a modified version of the single-item Perceived Occupational Discrimination Scale and were asked to recall any specific examples of experiences with racial discrimination, bias, or exclusion during their training. Examples were later categorized as different subtypes of racial microaggressions and were quantified through a descriptive analysis and compared by gender.

RESULTS

Among survey respondents, 34% (106 of 310) perceived a lot of residency workplace discrimination, 44% (137 of 310) perceived some residency workplace discrimination, 18% (55 of 310) perceived a little residency workplace discrimination, and 4% (12 of 310) perceived no residency workplace discrimination. Categorized examples of racial microaggressions experienced in residency were commonly reported, including being confused for a nonphysician medical staff (nurse or physician's assistant) by 87% (271 of 310) of respondents or nonmedical staff (janitorial or dietary services) by 81% (250 of 310) of respondents. Racially explicit statements received during residency training were reported by 61% (190 of 310) of respondents. Thirty-eight percent (117 of 310) of such statements were reportedly made by patients and 18% (55 of 310) were reportedly made by attending faculty. Fifty percent (155 of 310) of respondents reported receiving at least one of nine potentially exclusionary or devaluing feedback statements during their residency training. Among those respondents, 87% (135 of 155) perceived at least one of the statements to be racially biased in its context. The three feedback statements that, when received, were most frequently perceived as racially biased in their context was that the respondent "matched at their program to fulfill a diversity quota" (94% [34 of 36]), the respondent was unfriendly compared with their peers (92% [24 of 26]), or that the respondent was "intimidating or makes those around him/her uncomfortable" (88% [51 of 58]). When compared by gender, Black women more frequently reported being mistaken for janitors and dietary services at 97% (63 of 65), compared with Black men at 77% (187 of 244; p < 0.01). In addition, Black women more frequently reported being mistaken as nurses or physician assistants (100% [65 of 65]) than Black men did (84% [205 of 244]) during orthopaedic residency training (p < 0.01). Black women also more frequently reported receiving potentially devaluing or exclusionary feedback statements during residency training.

CONCLUSION

Perception of workplace discrimination during orthopaedic residency training is high (96%) among Black orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. Most respondents reported experiencing discrimination, bias, and exclusion that could be categorized as specific subtypes of racial microaggressions. Several different examples of racial microaggressions were more commonly reported by Black women. Certain feedback statements were frequently perceived as racially biased by recipients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To better understand barriers to the successful recruitment and retention of Black physicians in orthopaedics, the extent of racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion in residency training must be quantified. This study demonstrates that racial discrimination, bias, and exclusion during residency, wholly categorized as racial microaggressions, are frequently recalled by Black orthopaedic surgeons. A better understanding of the context of these experiences of Black trainees is a necessary starting point for the development of a more inclusive workplace training environment in orthopaedic surgery.

Exploring female otolaryngologists' experiences with gender bias and microaggressions: a cross sectional Canadian survey

BACKGROUND

Gender bias is behavior that shows favoritism towards one gender over another. Microaggressions are defined as subtle, often unconscious, discriminatory, or insulting actions that communicate demeaning or negative attitudes. Our objective was to explore how female otolaryngologists experience gender bias and microaggressions in the workplace.

METHODS

Anonymous web-based cross-sectional Canadian survey was distributed to all female otolaryngologists (attendings and trainees) using the Dillman's Tailored Design Method from July to August of 2021. Quantitative survey included demographic data, validated 44-item Sexist Microaggressions Experiences and Stress Scale (MESS) and validated 10-item General Self-efficacy scale (GSES). Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Sixty out of 200 participants (30% response rate) completed the survey (mean age 37 ± 8.3 years, 55.0% white, 41.7% trainee, 50% fellowship-trained, 50% with children, mean 9.2 ± 7.4 years of practice). Participants scored mild to moderate on the Sexist MESS-Frequency (mean ± standard deviation) 55.8 ± 24.2 (42.3% ± 18.3%), Severity 46.0 ± 23.9 (34.8% ± 18.1%), Total 104.5 ± 43.7 (39.6% ± 16.6%) and high on GSES (32.7 ± 5.7). Sexist MESS score was not associated with age, ethnicity, fellowship-training, having children, years of practice, or GSES. In the sexual objectification domain, trainees had higher frequency (p = 0.04), severity (p = 0.02) and total MESS (p = 0.02) scores than attendings.

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first multicenter, Canada-wide study exploring how female otolaryngologists experience gender bias and microaggressions in the workplace. Female otolaryngologists experience mild to moderate gender bias, but have high self-efficacy to manage this issue. Trainees had more severe and frequent microaggressions than attendings in the sexual objectification domain. Future efforts should help develop strategies for all otolaryngologists to manage these experiences, and thereby improve the culture of inclusiveness and diversity in our specialty.

Microaggressions and Implicit Bias in Hand Surgery

Implicit bias and microaggressions are well-known phenomenon and have recently been acknowledged as contributing to health care disparities. Within Hand Surgery, implicit bias and microaggressions occur in patient-surgeon, surgeon-peer, surgeon-staff, and training environment interactions. Although racial and gender biases are well studied, biases can also be based on age, sexual orientation, socioeconomic background, and/or hierarchal rank. Academia has well-documented evidence of implicit bias and microaggressions, contributing to current disparate demographics of trainees, physicians, and leaders within Hand Surgery. Awareness is fundamental to combating bias and microaggressions; however, actions must be taken to minimize negative effects and change culture.

Closing the Gap: Training Experiences and Career Outcomes for Underrepresented Minorities in Plastic Surgery

Background:

The present study assesses training characteristics, scholastic achievements, and traditional career accomplishments of ethnically underrepresented in medicine (UIM) plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) faculty relative to non-UIM PRS faculty.

Method:

A cross-sectional analysis of core PRS faculty appointed to accredited United States residency training programs (n = 99) was performed.

Results:

Of the 949 US PRS faculty, a total of 51 (5.4%) were identified as UIM. Compared with non-UIM faculty, there were few differences when evaluating medical education, residency training, pursuit of advanced degrees, and attainment of subspecialty fellowship training. UIM faculty were more likely than non-UIM faculty to have graduated from a medical school outside the United States (25% versus 13%, P = 0.014). In addition, UIM faculty did not differ from non-UIM counterparts in traditional career accomplishments, including promotion to full professor, obtaining NIH funding, serving as program director, receiving an endowed professorship, appointment to a peer-reviewed editorial board, scholarly contributions (H-index and number of publications), and appointment to chief/chair of their division/department.

Conclusions:

The historical lack of ethnic diversity that comprise US academic PRS faculty persists. This study reveals that those UIM faculty who are able to obtain faculty appointments are equally successful in achieving scholastic success and traditional career accomplishments as their non-UIM counterparts. As we strive toward increasing representation of UIM physicians in academic plastic surgery, the field will benefit from efforts that promote a pipeline for underrepresented groups who traditionally face barriers to entry.