1
|
Seeland GR, Williams BM, Yadav M, Bowden E, Antoniewicz LW, Kilpatrick CC, Mastrobattista JM, Ratan BM. Implementation and Evaluation of a Comprehensive Resident Wellness Curriculum During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2024; 81:397-403. [PMID: 38135549 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of resident-led and faculty-led initiatives for physician wellness after implementation of a resident wellness program. DESIGN We initiated a wellness curriculum with both resident and faculty-led components in a large academic OB/GYN residency program in October 2020. The curriculum was created and evaluated using the Logic model. Residents were surveyed pre and 8 months postintervention with the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Physician Well-Being Index (PWBI), with activity-related questions added to the second survey. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney test, Chi-square test, and theme analysis were performed as appropriate. SETTING A large academic OB/GYN residency at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston, Texas PARTICIPANTS: All residents (n = 48) were invited to take part in the surveys. Response rate was 31/48 (65%) pre and 28/48 (58%) postintervention. RESULTS Residents scored moderate for emotional exhaustion and depersonalization and high for personal accomplishment on both pre and post-MBI surveys. All indices of the PWBI improved over time; however, no significant differences were found in pre and postmeasures. Resident-led activities, which were alternated between individualized time off and group resident socialization, were rated significantly higher than faculty-led activities; 93% (52/56) of respondents rated resident-led activities in their top 2 most helpful initiatives compared to 7% (4/56) who rated faculty-led activities in their top 2 most helpful (p < 0.01) initiatives. Open-ended comments revealed that continued focus on wellness, attention to personal health, and systematic change were the most important ways to improve resident wellness. CONCLUSION Decreases in burnout were not achieved over an 8-month period with program-level resident-led and faculty-led initiatives. Providing scheduled time for residents to use at their discretion and the continuation of events that encourage socialization are tools that are highest rated by residents to facilitate wellness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianna R Seeland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Brinley M Williams
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Menaka Yadav
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Emily Bowden
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Leah W Antoniewicz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| | - Charlie C Kilpatrick
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Bani M Ratan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bogaert KC, Lieb WE, Glazer KB, Wang E, Stone JL, Howell EA. Stress and the Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Frontline Obstetrics and Gynecology Providers. Am J Perinatol 2022; 29:1596-1604. [PMID: 35640618 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic rapidly overwhelmed global health care systems in 2020, with New York City (NYC) marking the first epicenter in the United States. High levels of stress amongst health care workers have been reported in pandemics, but less is known about stress amongst Obstetrics and Gynecology (OB/GYN) providers. We sought to describe levels of stress, anxiety, depression, and other aspects of mental health among OB/GYN health care workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional electronic survey of a wide range of OB/GYN clinicians in a large NYC hospital system in the spring of 2020. We used both original survey questions and validated screening tools to assess stress, anxiety, depression, and burnout. We calculated median scores for these tools and compared median score between provider types. We also adapted questions on pandemic-related stressors from the MERS and SARS pandemics to fit the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and OB/GYN providers. RESULTS A total of 464 providers met study inclusion criteria, and 163 providers completed the survey (response rate = 35.1%). Approximately 35% of providers screened positive for anxiety and 21% for depression. Scores for depression, burnout, and fulfillment varied by provider type, with nurses scoring higher than physicians (p <0.05). The majority of respondents reported stress from pandemic and OB-specific stressors, including the possibility of transmitting COVID-19 to friends and family (83.9%, [95% confidence interval or CI 78.0-89.8%]), uncertainty regarding the pandemic's trajectory (91.3% [86.7-95.8%]), and frequent policy changes on labor and delivery (72.7% [65.1-80.3%]). CONCLUSION OB/GYN providers reported high levels of stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. The stress of caring for laboring patients during a pandemic may disproportionately affect nurses and trainees and highlights the need to provide interventions to ameliorate the negative impact of a pandemic on the mental health of our OB/GYN health care workers. KEY POINTS · COVID-19 led to stress amongst OB/GYN providers.. · Some stressors were unique to providing obstetric care.. · Nurses and trainees were more affected by this stress..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly C Bogaert
- Division of Hospital Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Whitney E Lieb
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Department of Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Kimberly B Glazer
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Department of Population Health Science & Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Eileen Wang
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joanne L Stone
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.,Blavatnik Family Women's Health Research Institute, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth A Howell
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Factors associated with burnout amongst medical students, residents, and attendings in Orthopaedics. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL (NASSJ) 2021; 7:100074. [PMID: 35141639 PMCID: PMC8819969 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|