The risk and prevention of sudden death in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Clinical Characteristics, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Patients With Myocardial Injury due to Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections

Background: Very few studies have characterized patients with myocardial injury due to Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections (KP-BSI). Our study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors and outcomes of patients with myocardial injury due to KP-BSI. Methods: A double-center retrospective cohort study of patients with KP-BSI was conducted from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2022. The clinical data was collected by reviewing electronic medical records. Classification of patients with KP-BSI into myocardial injury and nonmyocardial injury groups based on the levels of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) after 48 h onset of KP-BSI. Results: Patients with myocardial injury due to KP-BSI were generally younger than those without such injuries, with the former presenting a median age of 60 versus 67 in the latter (p < 0.001). Conditions like chronic cardiac insufficiency and chronic pulmonary disease were more prevalent in the myocardial injury cohort (10.0% and 7.1%, respectively) compared to those without myocardial injury (4.7% and 2.6%, respectively; p values 0.002 and 0.001). However, the nonmyocardial injury group had a higher incidence of solid tumors (15.3% vs. 10.4%, p=0.038). Severity assessments like the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) all registered higher for the myocardial injury group (all p < 0.001). Similarly, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, use of mechanical ventilation, and central venous catheter (CVC) placement were notably more common in this group (all p < 0.001). Regarding infection sources, the myocardial injury group had a higher incidence of pneumonia as the cause for KP-BSI (29.8% vs. 15.9%, p < 0.001), whereas liver and biliary tract infections were less frequent compared to their counterparts. Mortality rates at 7, 14, and 28 days, along with in-hospital mortality, were significantly higher for those with myocardial injury (all p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified age > 67 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.59-3.38], SOFA score > 6 (aOR, 3.04; 95% CI, 2.10-4.39), mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.15-2.39), and CVC in place (aOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.96-2.02) as independent prognostic factors for myocardial injury in KP-BSI. Conclusions: Older age (> 67 years), higher SOFA score (> 6), mechanical ventilation, and CVC in place were found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of myocardial injury. Clinical physicians should be alert to the potential for myocardial injury in elderly critically ill patients, especially those who are on mechanical ventilation and have indwelling CVC, in the event of KP-BSI.

The Impact of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitors on Arrhythmias in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) use has become increasingly popular. Current guidelines recommend using ARNI therapy for heart failure with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). As therapies become more widely available, heart failure-associated burdens such as ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD) will become increasingly prevalent. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of ARNI therapy on HFrEF and HFpEF pertaining to arrhythmogenesis and SCD. We performed a search of MEDLINE (PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for relevant studies. The odds ratios (ORs) of SCD, ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF), atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks were calculated. A total of 10 studies, including 6 randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies, were included in the analysis. A total of 18,548 patients from all studies were included, with 9,328 patients in the ARNI arm and 9,220 patients in the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) arm, with a median follow-up time of 15 months. There was a significant reduction in the composite outcomes of SCD and ventricular arrhythmias in patients treated with ARNIs compared to those treated with ACEIs/ARBs (OR, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-0.93; P = .01; I² = 17%; P = .29). ARNI therapy was also associated with a significant reduction in ICD shocks. There was no significant reduction in the VT, VF, AF, or SVT incidence rate in the ARNI group compared to the ACEI/ARB group. In conclusion, the use of ARNIs confers a reduction in composite outcomes of SCD and ventricular arrhythmias among patients with heart failure. These outcomes were mainly driven by SCD reduction in patients treated with ARNIs.

Trends in Sudden Death Following Admission for Acute Heart Failure

Few studies on sudden death (SD) after admission for acute heart failure (AHF) have been published. A total of 1,664 patients with AHF were enrolled in this study, and 1,261 patients who were successfully followed up during the first year after admission were analyzed. The primary end point was SD, which was defined as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The median follow-up period from admission was 1,008 days (range 408 to 2,132). In total, 505 patients (40.0%) died: 341 (67.5%) died of cardiovascular causes and 55 (10.9%) died of other causes. Of the 505 who died, 80 (15.8%) experienced SD. The proportion of SDs increased in the later phases of follow-up (0 to 1 year, 10.3%; 1 to 2 years, 18.0%; 2 to 5 years, 18.8%; ≥5 years, 28.2%; p <0.001). A multivariate logistic regression model showed that younger age was independently associated with SD (60 to 69 years: odds ratio 2.249, 95% confidence interval 1.060 to 4.722; <60 years: odds ratio 3.863, 95% confidence interval 1.676 to 8.905). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the incidence of cardiovascular death was highest during the acute phase, whereas the incidence of SD increased gradually over the entire follow-up period. In conclusion, the incidence of SD was surprisingly high in patients with AHF, accounting for 16% of long-term mortality. The proportion of SDs increased during the very late follow-up phases.

Clinical Phenotypes of Cardiovascular and Heart Failure Diseases Can Be Reversed? The Holistic Principle of Systems Biology in Multifaceted Heart Diseases

Recent advances in cardiology and biological sciences have improved quality of life in patients with complex cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) or heart failure (HF). Regardless of medical progress, complex cardiac diseases continue to have a prolonged clinical course with high morbidity and mortality. Interventional coronary techniques together with drug therapy improve quality and future prospects of life, but do not reverse the course of the atherosclerotic process that remains relentlessly progressive. The probability of CVDs and HF phenotypes to reverse can be supported by the advances made on the medical holistic principle of systems biology (SB) and on artificial intelligence (AI). Studies on clinical phenotypes reversal should be based on the research performed in large populations of patients following gathering and analyzing large amounts of relative data that embrace the concept of complexity. To decipher the complexity conundrum, a multiomics approach is needed with network analysis of the biological data. Only by understanding the complexity of chronic heart diseases and explaining the interrelationship between different interconnected biological networks can the probability for clinical phenotypes reversal be increased.

Association of time-varying changes in physical activity with cardiac death and all-cause mortality after ICD or CRT-D implantation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of longitudinal changes in physical activity (PA) with long-term outcomes after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation.

METHODS

Patients with ICD/CRT-D implantation from SUMMIT registry were retrospectively analyzed. Accelerometer-derived PA changes over 12 months post implantation were obtained from the archived home monitoring data. The primary endpoints were cardiac death and all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoints were the first ventricular arrthymia (VA) and first appropriate ICD shock.

RESULTS

In 705 patients, 446 (63.3%) patients showed improved PA over 12 months after implantation. During a mean 61.5-month follow-up duration, 99 cardiac deaths (14.0%) and 153 all-cause deaths (21.7%) occurred. Compared to reduced/unchanged PA, improved PA over 12 months could result in significantly reduced risks of cardiac death (improved PA ≤ 30 min: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.494, 95% CI: 0.288-0.848; > 30 min: HR = 0.390, 95% CI: 0.235-0.648) and all-cause mortality (improved PA ≤ 30 min: HR = 0.467, 95%CI: 0.299-0.728; > 30 min: HR = 0.451, 95% CI: 0.304-0.669). No differences in the VAs or ICD shocks were observed across different groups of PA changes. PA changes can predict the risks of cardiac death only in the low baseline PA group, but improved PA was associated with 56.7%, 57.4%, and 62.3% reduced risks of all-cause mortality in the low, moderate, and high baseline PA groups, respectively, than reduced/unchanged PA.

CONCLUSIONS

Improved PA could protect aganist cardiac death and all-cause mortality, probably reflecting better clinical efficacy after ICD/CRT-D implantation. Low-intensity exercise training might be encouraged among patients with different baseline PA levels.

Sacubitril/valsartan versus angiotensin inhibitors and arrhythmia endpoints in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Background

Angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) therapy has been associated with improved survival for patients with symptomatic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Objectives

We performed a meta-analysis of arrhythmia endpoints from studies comparing ARNI with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for patients with HFrEF to assess for incremental benefit.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Baseline study characteristics were collected and outcomes were sustained ventricular arrhythmias, atrial arrhythmias, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy, sudden cardiac death (SCD), and biventricular (BiV) pacing rate.

Results

We included 9 studies, 4 randomized trials, and 5 observational studies (5589 patients on ARNI vs 5615 on ACEIs/ARBs). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 51 months. The mean age was 65.4 ± 9.8 years, with 77.3% male patients and a mean ejection fraction of 29.0% ± 7.6%. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 62% of patients. In the ARNI group, there were less SCD (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–0.96; P = .02), ventricular arrhythmias (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25–0.79; P = .005), and appropriate ICD therapy (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21–0.74; P = .004). Higher rates of BiV pacing were seen (mean difference 3.13, 95% CI 2.58–3.68; P < .00001) when compared with ACEIs/ARBs. No difference in atrial arrhythmias was seen.

Conclusion

ARNI therapy provides incremental benefit with respect to ventricular tachyarrhythmias/SCD, which may, in part, explain improved outcomes in patients with HFrEF compared to ACEIs/ARBs. There was increased BiV pacing and decreased ICD therapy in the ARNI group.