Are the current evaluation tools for advanced therapies biased?

Intersection of social determinants of health with ventricular assist device therapy: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Social determinants of health (SDOH) may influence the clinical management of patients with heart failure. Further research is warranted on the relationship between SDOH and Ventricular Assist Device (VAD) therapy for heart failure.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this integrative review was to synthesize the state of knowledge on the intersection of SDOH with VAD therapy.

METHODS

Guided by Whittemore and Knafl's methodology, this literature search captured three concepts of interest including VAD therapy, SDOH, and their domains of intersection with patient selection, decision-making, treatment outcome, and resource allocation. CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched in March 2023. Articles were included if they were peer-reviewed publications in English, published between 2006 and 2023, conducted in the United States, and examined VAD therapy in the context of adult patients (age ≥ 18 years).

RESULTS

22 quantitative studies meeting the inclusion criteria informed the conceptualization of SDOH using the Healthy People 2030 framework. Four themes captured how the identified SDOH intersected with different processes relating to VAD therapy: patient decision-making, healthcare access and resource allocation, patient selection, and treatment outcomes. Most studies addressed the intersection of SDOH with healthcare access and treatment outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights substantial gaps in understanding how SDOH intersect with patient and patient selection for VAD. More research using mixed methods designs is warranted. On an institutional level, addressing bias and discrimination may have mitigated health disparities with treatment outcomes, but further research is needed for implementing system-wide change. Standardized assessment of SDOH is recommended throughout clinical practice from patient selection to outpatient VAD care.

Racial disparities across multiple stages of the deceased organ donation process

Pervasive structural violence causes higher organ failure rates among Black Americans and an excess of Black potential deceased organ donors. Underuse of Black donors would exacerbate organ shortages that disproportionately harm Black transplant candidates. This study investigates racial differences in transit between distinct donation steps among 132 968 potential donors across 557 hospitals and 6 organ procurement organizations (OPOs) from 2015 through 2021. Multilevel multistate modeling with patient covariates and OPO random effects shows adjusted likelihoods (95% confidence interval) of non-Black versus Black patients transitioning from OPO referral to approach of 1.39 (1.35, 1.44), approach to authorization: 1.64 (1.56, 1.72), authorization to procurement: 1.10 (1.04, 1.16), and procurement to transplant: 1.00 (0.95, 1.06). Overall organ utilization rates for Black, Latino, White, and other OPO referrals were 5.89%, 8.18%, 6.79%, and 5.24%, respectively. Adjusting for patient covariates and hospital and OPO random effects, multilevel logistic models estimated that compared with Black patients, Latino, White, and other patients had odds ratios of organ utilization of 1.81 (1.61, 2.03), 3.19 (2.91, 3.50), and 1.24 (1.05, 1.47), respectively. Nationwide in 2022, donor conversion disparities likely lost more than 1700 donors-two-thirds of whom would have been Black. Achieving racial equity for transplant candidates will require reducing racial disparities in organ donation.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Ambulatory Heart Failure Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Survival

BACKGROUND

Durable left ventricular assist devices (VADs) improve survival in eligible patients, but allocation has been associated with patient race in addition to presumed heart failure (HF) severity.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine racial and ethnic differences in VAD implantation rates and post-VAD survival among patients with ambulatory HF.

METHODS

Using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry of Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) database (2012-2017), this study examined census-adjusted VAD implantation rates by race, ethnicity, and sex in patients with ambulatory HF (INTERMACS profile 4-7) using negative binomial models with quadratic effect of time. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox models adjusted for clinically relevant variables and an interaction of time with race/ethnicity.

RESULTS

VADs were implanted in 2,256 adult patients with ambulatory HF (78.3% White, 16.4% Black, and 5.3% Hispanic). The median age at implantation was lowest in Black patients. Implantation rates peaked between 2013 and 2015 before declining in all demographic groups. From 2012 to 2017, implantation rates overlapped for Black and White patients but were lower for Hispanic patients. Post-VAD survival was significantly different among the 3 groups (log rank P = 0.0067), with higher estimated survival among Black vs White patients (12-month survival: Black patients: 90% [95% CI: 86%-93%]; White patients: 82% [95% CI: 80%-84%]). Low sample size for Hispanic patients resulted in imprecise survival estimates (12-month survival: 85% [95% CI: 76%-90%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Black and White patients with ambulatory HF had similar VAD implantation rates but rates were lower for Hispanic patients. Survival differed among the 3 groups, with the highest estimated survival at 12 months in Black patients. Given higher HF burden in minoritized populations, further investigation is needed to understand differences in VAD implantation rates in Black and Hispanic patients.

Racial Inequities in Access to Ventricular Assist Device and Transplant Persist After Consideration for Preferences for Care: A Report From the REVIVAL Study

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities in access to advanced therapies for heart failure (HF) patients are well documented, although the reasons remain uncertain. We sought to determine the association of race on utilization of ventricular assist device (VAD) and transplant among patients with access to care at VAD centers and if patient preferences impact the effect.

METHODS

We performed an observational cohort study of ambulatory chronic systolic HF patients with high-risk features and no contraindication to VAD enrolled at 21 VAD centers and followed for 2 years in the REVIVAL study (Registry Evaluation of Vital Information for VADs in Ambulatory Life). We used competing events cause-specific proportional hazard methodology with multiple imputation for missing data. The primary outcomes were (1) VAD/transplant and (2) death. The exposures of interest included race (Black or White), additional demographics, captured social determinants of health, clinician-assessed HF severity, patient-reported quality of life, preference for VAD, and desire for therapies.

RESULTS

The study included 377 participants, of whom 100 (26.5%) identified as Black. VAD or transplant was performed in 11 (11%) Black and 62 (22%) White participants, although death occurred in 18 (18%) Black and 36 (13%) White participants. Black race was associated with reduced utilization of VAD and transplant (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.23-0.85]) without an increase in death. Preferences for VAD or life-sustaining therapies were similar by race and did not explain racial disparities.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients receiving care by advanced HF cardiologists at VAD centers, there is less utilization of VAD and transplant for Black patients even after adjusting for HF severity, quality of life, and social determinants of health, despite similar care preferences. This residual inequity may be a consequence of structural racism and discrimination or provider bias impacting decision-making.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT01369407.

Implicit Bias Training: Improving Outcomes for Patients With Cancer Who Have Substance Use Disorders

Being mindful of one's implicit bias in the treatment of patients with cancer who have substance use disorders is fundamental to quality of care and good patient outcomes. Implicit bias held by healthcare professionals could negatively affect patient assessment, diagnosis and treatment decisions, and follow-ups at discharge.