Trends in Physical Activity Among US Adults With Heart Failure, 2007-2016

Initiating and Continuing Long-Term Exercise in Heart Failure: A Qualitative Analysis From the GEtting iNTo Light Exercise-Heart Failure Study

BACKGROUND

Exercise is a class 1A recommendation to improve the lives of patients with heart failure, yet less than one-third adhere to physical activity guidelines, and less than 3% attend cardiac rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of gentle nonaerobic exercise on initial and long-term adherence in patients with heart failure.

METHODS

We used a qualitative descriptive approach with qualitative content analysis to analyze previously recorded interview data collected as part of the 6-month GEtting iNTo Light Exercise-Heart Failure study and looked for trends in responses among our sample. Thematic statements, representing salient aspects of the participants' experiences, were created and supported by illustrative excerpts from the data.

RESULTS

Twenty-two interviews were analyzed. Eight participants had ≥80% adherence, and the remaining 14 participants were super-adherers (>100% adherence). Super-adherers tended to be male and 65 years or older, and have no exercise for 3 months before the study, a body mass index ≥ 30, and poor to good Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores. Participants initially enrolled because they saw the program as an opportunity to improve a health issue and to exercise. Long-term adherence was facilitated by convenience, individualization, experiencing psychological and physical improvements, and peer fellowship.

CONCLUSIONS

The GEtting iNTo Light Exercise-Heart Failure study that used home-based gentle nonaerobic exercise had 64% of participants come more than was asked. It is imperative that clinicians incorporate what participants with heart failure have directly stated is important for their initiation and long-term adherence to exercise so that we can work toward bridging sedentary patients to the full exercise guidelines to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Association Between Meeting Physical Activity Time-Intensity Guidelines With Ambulation, Quality of Life, and Inflammation in Claudication

PURPOSE

The aim of this investigation was to determine if meeting the 2018 physical activity (PA) time-intensity guidelines was associated with better ambulatory function, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), vascular function, and inflammation than failing to meet the guidelines in patients with peripheral artery disease and claudication. Second, we determined the optimal number of total steps/d and steps taken at moderate cadence needed to meet the PA time-intensity guidelines.

METHODS

Five hundred seventy-two patients were assessed on daily ambulatory activity for 1 wk with a step activity monitor, and were grouped according to whether they achieved <150 min/wk of moderate-intensity PA (group 1 = do not meet guidelines; n = 397) or whether they were above this threshold (group 2 = meet guidelines; n = 175).

RESULTS

Treadmill peak walking time (mean ± SD) was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (709 ± 359 sec) than in group 1 (427 ± 281 sec). The physical function HRQoL score was higher ( P < .001) in group 2 (61 ± 22%) than in group 1 (44 ± 21%). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was lower ( P < .001) in group 2 (3.6 ± 4.5 mg/L) than in group 1 (5.9 ± 6.1 mg/L). Finally, ≥7675 total steps/d and ≥1660 steps/d at moderate cadence were optimal thresholds associated with meeting PA guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with claudication who meet the 2018 PA time-intensity guidelines for US adults had better ambulation, HRQoL, and vascular outcomes than those who failed to meet the PA guidelines. Patients with claudication best achieved the PA time-intensity guidelines by taking ≥7675 total steps/d, and ≥1660 steps/d at a moderate cadence.

Early Cardiac Rehabilitation to Reduce Heart Failure Readmissions

PURPOSE

This research was conducted to determine whether early participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces readmissions following heart failure (HF) hospitalization.

METHODS

A retrospective quasiexperimental comparison group design was used. Electronic medical records were abstracted for HF patients discharged between March 2013 and December 2017. The treatment group was defined as patients with HF who attended ≥1 CR session within 6 wk following discharge. The comparison group was defined as patients with HF without additional HF hospitalizations during the previous year, discharged to home/self-care, and did not attend CR within 6 wk. Readmission rates at 30 d and 6 wk were compared between groups using χ 2 analysis and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Out of 8613 patients with HF, 205 (2.4%) attended ≥1 CR within 6 wk post-discharge. The treatment group had lower, but not statistically significant, readmission rates than the comparison group for 30-d readmissions for HF ( P = .13), and 6-wk readmission rates for HF ( P = .05). The treatment group had lower all-cause readmissions at 30 d (P < .01) and 6 wk ( P < .01) than the comparison group. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that early CR attendance was associated with reduced 30-d all-cause readmissions (adjusted OR = 0.4: 95% CI, 0.2-0.7) and 6-wk all-cause readmissions (adjusted OR = 0.5: 95% CI, 0.3-0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This study contributes to the existing evidence for allowing early unrestricted CR participation with the aim of improving the health of patients with HF and reducing rehospitalization rates.

Older phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation patients engaged in gardening maintained physical function during the COVID-19 pandemic

This study aimed to clarify the effects of gardening on hemodynamic response, rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during exercise, and body weight in patients in whom phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation (CR) was interrupted due to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Among 76 outpatients participating in consecutive phase 2 CR in both periods from March to April and June to July 2020, which were before and after CR interruption, respectively, at Sanda City Hospital were enrolled. The inclusion criterion was outpatients whose CR was interrupted due to COVID-19. Patients under the age of 65 were excluded. We compared the data of hemodynamic response and RPE during exercise on the last day before interruption and the first day after interruption when aerobic exercise was performed at the same exercise intensity in the gardener group and the non-gardener group. Forty-one patients were enrolled in the final analysis. After CR interruption, the gardener group did not show any significant difference in all items, whereas the non-gardener group experienced significant increase in HR (Peak) (p = 0.004) and worsening of the Borg scale scores for both dyspnea and lower extremity fatigue (p = 0.039 and p = 0.009, respectively). Older phase 2 CR patients engaged in gardening did not show any deterioration in hemodynamic response or RPE during exercise, despite CR interruption and refraining from going outside. Gardening may be recommended as one of the activities that can maintain or improve physical function in older phase 2 CR patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.