Urinary sodium excretion predicts blood pressure response to spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension independent of aldosterone status

Exploratory study on the relationship between urinary sodium/potassium ratio, salt intake, and the antihypertensive effect of esaxerenone: the ENaK Study

Excessive salt intake is one of the causes of hypertension, and reducing salt intake is important for managing the risk of hypertension and subsequent cardiovascular events. Esaxerenone, a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, has the potential to exert an antihypertensive effect in hypertensive patients with excessive salt intake, but evidence is still lacking, especially in clinical settings. We aimed to determine if baseline sodium/potassium ratio and baseline estimated 24-h urinary sodium excretion can predict the antihypertensive effect of esaxerenone in patients with essential hypertension inadequately controlled with an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or a calcium channel blocker (CCB). This was an exploratory, open-label, interventional study with a 4-week observation period and a 12-week treatment period. Esaxerenone was orally administered once daily in accordance with the Japanese package insert. In total, 126 patients met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled (ARB subcohort, 67; CCB subcohort, 59); all were included in the full analysis set (FAS) and safety analysis. In the FAS, morning home systolic blood pressure (SBP)/diastolic blood pressure (DBP) significantly decreased from baseline to end of treatment (primary efficacy endpoint) (-11.9 ± 10.9/ - 6.4 ± 6.8 mmHg, both p < 0.001); a similar trend was observed in both subcohorts. Significant reductions were also shown in bedtime home and office SBP/DBP (all p < 0.001). Each BP change was consistent regardless of the urinary sodium/potassium ratio or estimated 24-h urinary sodium excretion at baseline. The urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) significantly decreased from baseline to Week 12 in the total population and both subcohorts. No new safety concerns were raised. Esaxerenone significantly decreased morning home, bedtime home, and office BP; UACR; and NT-proBNP in this patient population, regardless of concomitant ARB or CCB use. The antihypertensive effect of esaxerenone was independent of the urinary sodium/potassium ratio and estimated 24-h urinary sodium excretion at baseline.

Extra-adrenal aldosterone: a mini review focusing on the physiology and pathophysiology of intrarenal aldosterone

PURPOSE

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated the existence of extra-adrenal aldosterone in various tissues, including the brain, heart, vascular, adipocyte, and kidney, mainly based on the detection of the CYP11B2 (aldosterone synthase, cytochrome P450, family 11, subfamily B, polypeptide 2) expression using semi-quantitative methods including reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and antibody-based western blotting, as well as local tissue aldosterone levels by antibody-based immunosorbent assays. This mini-review highlights the current evidence and challenges in extra-adrenal aldosterone, focusing on intrarenal aldosterone.

METHODS

A narrative review.

RESULTS

Locally synthesized aldosterone may play a vital role in various physio-pathological processes, especially cardiovascular events. The site of local aldosterone synthesis in the kidney may include the mesangial cells, podocytes, proximal tubules, and collecting ducts. The synthesis of renal aldosterone may be regulated by (pro)renin receptor/(pro)renin, angiotensin II/Angiotensin II type 1 receptor, wnt/β-catenin, cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E2, and klotho. Enhanced renal aldosterone release promotes Na+ reabsorption and K+ excretion in the distal nephron and may contribute to the progress of diabetic nephropathy and salt-related hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhibition of intrarenal aldosterone signaling by aldosterone synthase inhibitors or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists may be a hopeful pharmacological technique for the therapy of diabetic nephropathy and saltrelated hypertension. Yet, current reports are often conflicting or ambiguous, leading many to question whether extra-adrenal aldosterone exists, or whether it is of any physiological and pathophysiological significance.

Efficacy and safety of a low-sodium diet and spironolactone in patients with stage 1-3a chronic kidney disease: a pilot study

Background

Excessive salt intake is associated with the deterioration of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Aldosterone is also known as an independent risk factor for kidney injury. Dietary sodium intake acts as a main stimulator in aldosterone-mediated kidney injury. Hence, this study aimed to further investigate the renal protective effects and safety of a low-sodium diet in combination with spironolactone (SPL) in stage 1-3a CKD.

Methods

This single-center, SPL-blinded randomized controlled trial recruited patients with stage 1-3a CKD, randomized into three groups, low-sodium (3 g/d salt) + placebo, medium-sodium (5 g/d salt) + SPL, and low-sodium (3 g/d salt) + SPL. Patients received 12 weeks of intervention. The primary and secondary endpoints were 24-h urine protein and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the end of the intervention, respectively.

Results

A total of 74 patients were analyzed eventually. Significantly decreased 24-h urine protein was found in all three groups, from 0.37 to 0.23 g/d (P = 0.004) in the low-sodium+placebo group, from 0.44 to 0.29 g/d (P = 0.020) in the medium-sodium+SPL group, and from 0.35 to 0.31 g/d (P = 0.013) in the low-sodium +SPL group. There were no significant differences among the three groups in 24-h urine protein amount change after intervention from pre-treatment values (P = 0.760, ITT set). The results of the 24-h urine protein by using PP set analysis was similar to the ITT set. No significant differences in eGFR, nutritional, metabolic, inflammatory, and other biomarkers were observed across all three groups (P > 0.05). No safety signal was observed.

Conclusion

No additional benefit was observed when SPL was prescribed to patients already on a low-sodium diet (3.0 g/d). Still, small doses of SPL may benefit patients with poor sodium restriction. A combination of short-term low-dose SPL and ARB is safe for patients with stage 1-3a CKD, but blood potassium must be regularly monitored.

Trial registration

Name of the registry: Chinese clinical trial registry.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR1900026991.

Date of registration: Retrospectively registered 28 October 2019.

URL of trial registry record: http://www.chictr.org.cn/searchproj.aspx?title=&officialname=&subjectid=&secondaryid=&applier=&studyleader=ðicalcommitteesanction=&spo

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-022-02711-z.

Antihypertensive Effect of Long-Term Monotherapy with Esaxerenone in Patients with Essential Hypertension: Relationship Between Baseline Urinary Sodium Excretion and Its Antihypertensive Effect

INTRODUCTION

The blood pressure (BP) control mechanism for mineralocorticoid receptor blockers is unclear, and analysis of their use as a single agent in the clinical setting is required to resolve this uncertainty. There is a paucity of data on esaxerenone monotherapy assessing its long-term antihypertensive effect and urinary biomarkers.

METHODS

This post hoc exploratory substudy of a long-term phase 3 study evaluated the effect of esaxerenone monotherapy (2.5 or 5 mg/day) in treatment-naïve patients who continued the therapy during the 52-week study period (n = 25). In addition to blood biomarkers, urinary biomarkers were also assessed in 24-h urine collection samples.

RESULTS

Esaxerenone monotherapy was associated with consistent reductions in systolic/diastolic BP in the substudy population (- 23.5/- 13.1 mmHg at week 52, p < 0.001 vs baseline). Plasma aldosterone concentrations and plasma renin activity significantly increased during esaxerenone monotherapy at all time points. On the basis of the observations that both urine volume and urinary sodium excretion also decreased up to the end of the study, and were significantly lower at 12 weeks, patients were further categorized into higher/lower urinary sodium excretion subgroups according to whether their baseline values were above or below the median. In the group with higher baseline urinary sodium excretion, esaxerenone exhibited a significantly greater decrease in systolic/diastolic BP compared to the lower baseline group.

CONCLUSION

Esaxerenone exhibited sustained and stable antihypertensive activity even when administered as a single agent for 52 weeks in patients with essential hypertension. The additional urinary biomarker analysis suggests that the BP-lowering effects of esaxerenone may be partly exerted via mechanisms related to salt and water retention, and that the effect is particularly pronounced in patients with hypertension and higher baseline urinary sodium excretion, which may reflect a state of excessive salt intake.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02722265.

Resistant hypertension: new insights and therapeutic perspectives

Resistant hypertension (RH) is a concept that currently goes beyond the classical definition of blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg in subjects receiving three or more drugs of different classes at maximally tolerated doses. Here, we review the clinical relevance of RH and the different types of RH-associated phenotypes, namely refractory hypertension, controlled resistant hypertension, and masked uncontrolled hypertension. We also discuss current drug strategies and future treatments for these high-risk phenotypes.

Prediction of the early response to spironolactone in resistant hypertension by the combination of matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity and arterial stiffness parameters

AIMS

The aim of present study was to determine whether arterial stiffness assessed with the biochemical parameter active matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 and the clinical parameters pulse pressure (PP) and pulse wave velocity predicts the response to spironolactone in resistant hypertension (RH).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and active MMP-9 (measured by zymography and ELISA) were measured at baseline, and patients were classified as having pseudo-RH or RH. Patients with RH received spironolactone and the response was determined after 8 weeks by ambulatory BP monitoring: those who achieved BP goals were considered controlled (CRH) and those who did not were considered uncontrolled (UCRH). Plasma active MMP-9 was significantly higher in patients with RH than with pseudo-RH, and correlated with 24-hour systolic BP and PP. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that active MMP-9 could predict the response to spironolactone, and its combination with 24-hour PP and pulse wave velocity significantly improved this prediction. Moreover, plasma of patients with UCRH induced the MMP-9 expression pathway.

CONCLUSION

We propose active MMP-9 as a useful biomarker to identify patients with RH who will not respond to spironolactone. Combining MMP-9 activity with classical arterial stiffness parameters improves the prediction of the clinical response to spironolactone and might contribute to guide the most appropriate therapeutic decisions for patients with RH.

Salt intake in mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist-treated primary aldosteronism: foe or ally?

Mild hyperkalemia is a common side effect of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), which can be worsened by instructions to minimize salt intake. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of salt consumption on serum potassium levels and mean, mean minimal, and mean maximal systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in MRA-treated hyperkalemic PA patients under relative salt restriction. Seventeen consecutive mildly hyperkalemic MRA-treated PA patients aged 66.3 ± 8.37 years were recruited. Body mass index (BMI) and BP were assessed, and serum and 24-h urinary sodium and potassium levels, plasma renin, and serum aldosterone were measured, while patients followed a relatively salt-restricted diet, after 1 month of controlled salt supplementation (usual salt-restricted diet plus 4 g salt/day) and after 6 months on instructions for free dietary salt consumption. Baseline salt consumption was additionally evaluated in two more patient groups (normotensive subjects and normokalemic MRA-treated PA patients). One month of controlled salt supplementation (24-h urine sodium (median, min, max): 195.2 (120.30-275.20) vs 110.13 (34.30-139.20) mEq/day, p < 0.001) resulted in increased kaliuresis (62.25 (40.69-97.0) vs 54.0 (23.28-79.60) mEq/day, p = 0.001) and a decrease of serum potassium (5.2 (5-5.70) vs 4.6 (3.8-5.1) mEq/L, p < 0.001), while serum sodium (139 (133-141) vs 1 39 (135-144) mEq/L) and mean systolic (130 (105-141 vs. 130 (106-141) mmHg) and diastolic (76 (53-85) vs75 (53-84) mmHg) BP remained stable. These findings were unchanged after 6 months of free salt consumption. BMI remained constant, while plasma renin and serum aldosterone decreased following salt repletion. Adequate salt consumption attenuates MRA-induced hyperkalemia in relatively salt-restricted PA patients without affecting BP or BMI.

Sex-specific responses to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism in hypertensive African American males and females

BACKGROUND

African Americans (AA) develop hypertension (HTN) at an earlier age, have a greater frequency and severity of HTN, and greater prevalence of uncontrolled HTN as compared to the white population. Mineralocorticoid antagonists have been shown to be very effective in treating uncontrolled HTN in both AA and white patients, but sex-specific responses are unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated the sex-specific impact of mineralocorticoid antagonism in an AA population. An AA cohort (n = 1483) from the Genetic Epidemiology Network of Arteriopathy study was stratified based on sex and whether they were taking spironolactone, a mineralocorticoid antagonist, in their antihypertensive regimen.

RESULTS

As compared to AA women not prescribed a mineralocorticoid antagonist, AA women taking spironolactone (n = 9) had lower systolic and diastolic blood pressure despite having a similar number of antihypertensive medications. The proportion of AA women with uncontrolled HTN was significantly less for patients taking spironolactone than for patients not prescribed spironolactone. Interestingly, none of these associations were found in the AA males or in white females.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggests that spironolactone is particularly effective in reducing blood pressure and controlling HTN in AA women. Further research into the impact of this therapy in this underserved and understudied minority is warranted.

Diagnosing and Managing Primary Aldosteronism in Hypertensive Patients: a Case-Based Approach

Primary aldosteronism with a prevalence of 8 % of hypertension and 20 % of pharmacologically resistant hypertension is the most common secondary cause of hypertension. Yet, the diagnosis is missed in the vast majority of patients. Current clinical practice guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism in patients with sustained elevation of blood pressure (BP) ≥150/100 mmHg if possible prior to initiation of antihypertensive therapy, and in patients with resistant hypertension, spontaneous or diuretic-induced hypokalemia, adrenal incidentaloma, obstructive sleep apnea, a family history of early onset of hypertension or cerebrovascular accident <age 40, and first-degree relatives of patients with primary aldosteronism. Clinical and laboratory methods of screening, confirmatory testing, subtype classification, and medical and surgical management are systematically reviewed and illustrated with a clinical case.

Advances in understanding the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in blood pressure control and recent pivotal trials of RAAS blockade in heart failure and diabetic nephropathy

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a fundamental role in the physiology of blood pressure control and the pathophysiology of hypertension (HTN) with effects on vascular tone, sodium retention, oxidative stress, fibrosis, sympathetic tone, and inflammation. Fortunately, RAAS blocking agents have been available to treat HTN since the 1970s and newer medications are being developed. In this review, we will (1) examine new anti-hypertensive medications affecting the RAAS, (2) evaluate recent studies that help provide a better understanding of which patients may be more likely to benefit from RAAS blockade, and (3) review three recent pivotal randomized trials that involve newer RAAS blocking agents and inform clinical practice.

Use of Aldosterone Antagonists for Treatment of Uncontrolled Resistant Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies indicate that primary aldosteronism (PA) is common in patients with resistant hypertension, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 20%. Additional studies suggest that beyond this 20% of patients with classical PA, there is a larger proportion of patients with lesser degrees of hyperaldosteronism which contributes even more broadly to antihypertensive treatment resistance. Given these observations, it is intuitive that use of aldosterone antagonists will provide antihypertensive benefit in patients with resistant hypertension and evidence of aldosterone excess. Intriguingly, however, are clinical findings demonstrating substantive benefit of aldosterone antagonists in patients with resistant hypertension, but without demonstrative evidence of hyperaldosteronism, that is, with seemingly normal or even low aldosterone levels.

CONCLUSION

Spironolactone is clearly established as the most effective fourth agent for treatment of uncontrolled resistant hypertension. Emerging observations suggest a further role of spironolactone for counteracting the effects of diet high in sodium, particularly in obese, hypertensive patients.

A meta-analysis of add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension has been investigated in several small studies. We performed this meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of add-on use of spironolactone in these patients.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for all published studies evaluating add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension. Only randomized controlled trials determining antihypertensive effects of spironolactone were considered.

RESULTS

The antihypertensive effects were assessed in 869 patients included in 4 trials with a mean follow-up of 12±3weeks. The reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in patients treated with spironolactone was greater than placebo (weighted mean differences (WMD) for SBP -16.67mmHg (95% confidence interval (CI), -27.54, -5.80), p<0.01; WMD for DBP -6.11mmHg (95% CI, -9.34, -2.88), p<0.001), respectively. The rates of serious adverse effects or patient withdrawals from the trials tended to be higher in patients treated with spironolactone than placebo (WMD for odds ratio 2.11 (95% CI, 0.98, 4.53), p=0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides the evidence that add-on use of spironolactone in patients with resistant hypertension is effective in lowering SBP and DBP, suggesting an add-on use of spironolactone as fourth line therapy in patients with resistant hypertension.