1
|
El Dib R, Periyasamy AG, de Barros JL, França CG, Senefonte FL, Vesentini G, Alves MGO, Rodrigues JVDS, Gomaa H, Gomes Júnior JR, Costa LF, Von Ancken TDS, Toneli C, Suzumura EA, Kawakami CP, Faustino EG, Jorge EC, Almeida JD, Kapoor A. Probiotics for the treatment of depression and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2021; 45:75-90. [PMID: 34620373 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIM Probiotics in the gut have been suggested to have a beneficial effect on anxiety response and depressive disorder. Hence we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the effects of probiotics associated with or without pharmacological or psychological therapies in patients with depressive and/or anxiety symptoms or disorders. METHODS We conducted searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ProQuest, LILACS, and Web of Science up to February 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of probiotics associated with or without pharmacological or psychological therapies for patient-important outcomes including relief of depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms, cognitive functions, adverse events and quality of life. We used the GRADE approach to rate the overall certainty of the evidence by outcome. The protocol of the systematic review was registered with PROPSERO and published under the number CRD4202016329. RESULTS 16 RCTs including 1,125 patients proved eligible. Results suggested a significant improvement in using Beck Depression Index (MD, -3.20 [95% CI, -5.91 to -0.49], p = 0.02; I2 = 21%, p = 0.28) for depression symptoms and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (MD, -6.88 [95% CI, -12.35 to -1.41], p = 0.01; I2 = 24%, p = 0.25) for anxiety with overall certainty in evidence rated as moderate and low, respectively. However, Depression Scale (DASS-Depression) (MD, 2.01 [95% CI, -0.80 to 4.82], p = 0.16; I2 = 0%, p = 0.62), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRAS) (MD, -2,41 [95% CI, -10,55 to 5,72], p = 0,56; I2 = 87%, p = 0,006), Anxiety scale (DASS-Anxiety) (MD, 0.49 [95% CI, -4.05 to 5.02], p = 0.83; I2 = 74%, p = 0.05), and Stress Scale (DASS-Stress) (MD, 0.84 [95% CI, -2.64 to 4.33], p = 0.64; I2 = 34%, p = 0.22) showed no significant decrease in the relief of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms of probiotics compared to placebo with overall certainty in evidence rated as very low for all outcomes. We also found no differences in the Beck Anxiety Index (BAI) (MD, -3.21 [95% CI, -6.50 to 0.08], p = 0.06; I2 = 0%, p = 0.88) with overall certainty in evidence rated as low. Results suggested a non-statistically significantly effect of probiotics in the adverse events outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The current review suggests that probiotics may improve symptoms of depression and anxiety in clinical patients. However, given the limitations in the included studies, RCTs with long-term follow-up and large sample sizes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina El Dib
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil; McMaster Institute of Urology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| | | | - Jessica Lima de Barros
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Carolina Gonzales França
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Fernanda Labiapari Senefonte
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Giovana Vesentini
- Laboratory of Experimental Research on Gynecology and Obstetrics, Postgraduate Course on Tocogynecology, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
| | - Mônica Ghislaine Oliveira Alves
- Universidade Anhembi-Morumbi, Campus São José Dos Campos, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; School of Dentistry, Universidade Mogi Das Cruzes, Mogi Das Cruzes, SP, Brazil
| | - João Vitor da Silva Rodrigues
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Huda Gomaa
- High Institute of Public Health-Alexandria University, Tanta, Egypt; Drug Information Center, Tanta Chest Hospital, Tanta, Egypt
| | - José Reinaldo Gomes Júnior
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | | | - Thainá de Souza Von Ancken
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Carla Toneli
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Erica A Suzumura
- Departament of Preventive Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina - FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Claudio Pereira Kawakami
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Eliseu Gabriel Faustino
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Eliane Chaves Jorge
- Department of Surgical Specialties and Anesthesiology Department, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Janete Dias Almeida
- Department of Biosciences and Oral Diagnosis, Institute of Science and Technology, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
| | - Anil Kapoor
- McMaster Institute of Urology, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hillemacher T, Bachmann O, Kahl KG, Frieling H. Alcohol, microbiome, and their effect on psychiatric disorders. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2018; 85:105-115. [PMID: 29705711 DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
There is accumulating evidence that alcohol consumption and especially alcohol withdrawal increase brain levels of known innate immune signaling molecules and cause neuroinflammation. It has been shown that microbiota play a pivotal role in this process and affect central neurochemistry and behavior. Disruption of or alterations in the intimate cross-talk between microbiome and brain may be a significant factor in many psychiatric disorders. Alterations in the composition of the microbiome, so called dysbiosis, may result in detrimental distortion of microbe-host homeostasis modulating the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. A variety of pathologies are associated with changes in the community structure and function of the gut microbiota, suggesting a link between dysbiosis and disease etiology, including irritable bowel syndrome depression, anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and alcoholism. Despite a paucity of clinical studies in alcohol-dependent humans, emerging data suggests that alcohol induced alterations of the microbiome may explain reward-seeking behaviors as well as anxiety, depression, and craving in withdrawal and increase the risk of developing psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Hillemacher
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Paracelsus Medical University Nuremberg, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Germany
| | - Oliver Bachmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Germany; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Hannover-Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Kai G Kahl
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Germany
| | - Helge Frieling
- Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry, and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cerdó T, Ruíz A, Suárez A, Campoy C. Probiotic, Prebiotic, and Brain Development. Nutrients 2017; 9:E1247. [PMID: 29135961 PMCID: PMC5707719 DOI: 10.3390/nu9111247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2017] [Revised: 11/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, a number of studies have demonstrated the existence of a link between the emotional and cognitive centres of the brain and peripheral functions through the bi-directional interaction between the central nervous system and the enteric nervous system. Therefore, the use of bacteria as therapeutics has attracted much interest. Recent research has found that there are a variety of mechanisms by which bacteria can signal to the brain and influence several processes in relation to neurotransmission, neurogenesis, and behaviour. Data derived from both in vitro experiments and in vivo clinical trials have supported some of these new health implications. While recent molecular advancement has provided strong indications to support and justify the role of the gut microbiota on the gut-brain axis, it is still not clear whether manipulations through probiotics and prebiotics administration could be beneficial in the treatment of neurological problems. The understanding of the gut microbiota and its activities is essential for the generation of future personalized healthcare strategies. Here, we explore and summarize the potential beneficial effects of probiotics and prebiotics in the neurodevelopmental process and in the prevention and treatment of certain neurological human diseases, highlighting current and future perspectives in this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomás Cerdó
- Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
- EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
| | - Alicia Ruíz
- EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
| | - Antonio Suárez
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 2, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
| | - Cristina Campoy
- Department of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
- EURISTIKOS Excellence Centre for Paediatric Research, Biomedical Research Centre, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
- Spanish Network of Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Carlos III Institute, 18016 Granada, Spain.
- Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Av. de la Investigación, 11, 18016 Granada, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|