The ACIRA Registry: A Regional Tool to Improve the Healthcare Pathway for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Angiographies in the French Aquitaine Region: Study Design and First Results

[Registry CARDIO-ARSIF - Database on coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary invasive performed in Île-de-France]

The CARDIO-ARSIF registry has been continuously collecting comprehensive data on coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) performed in the 36 catheterization laboratories across the Île-de-France region since 2000. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, this registry has recorded information from more than 330,000 patients, encompassing more than one million procedures. Among these procedures, 58% consisted of coronary angiography, 13% were percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and the remaining 28% were PCI performed on an ad-hoc basis. This extensive dataset serves as a valuable resource for both qualitative and quantitative assessments of practices and the relevance of procedures in the field of coronary invasive cardiology. The results of these analyses undergo annual validation by a dedicated scientific committee and are shared with the teams of investigators. The exploitation of this data has led to scientific publications, with one notable finding being a consistent reduction in the radiation doses received by patients, regardless of the type of procedure.

Effects of healthcare system transformations spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic on management of stroke and STEMI: a registry-based cohort study in France

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of changes in use of care and implementation of hospital reorganisations spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic (first wave) on the acute management times of patients who had a stroke and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

DESIGN

Two cohorts of patients who had an STEMI and stroke in the Aquitaine Cardio-Neuro-Vascular (CNV) registry.

SETTING

6 emergency medical services, 30 emergency units (EUs), 14 hospitalisation units and 11 cathlabs in the Aquitaine region.

PARTICIPANTS

This study involved 9218 patients (6436 patients who had a stroke and 2782 patients who had an STEMI) in the CNV Registry from January 2019 to August 2020.

METHOD

Hospital reorganisations, retrieved in a scoping review, were collected from heads of hospital departments. Other data were from the CNV Registry. Associations between reorganisations, use of care and care management times were analysed using multivariate linear regression mixed models. Interaction terms between use-of-care variables and period (pre-wave, per-wave and post-wave) were introduced.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

STEMI cohort, first medical contact-to-procedure time; stroke cohort, EU admission-to-imaging time.

RESULTS

Per-wave period management times deteriorated for stroke but were maintained for STEMI. Per-wave changes in use of care did not affect STEMI management. No association was found between reorganisations and stroke management times. In the STEMI cohort, the implementation of systematic testing at admission was associated with a 41% increase in care management time (exp=1.409, 95% CI 1.075 to 1.848, p=0.013). Implementation of plan blanc, which concentrated resources in emergency activities, was associated with a 19% decrease in management time (exp=0.801, 95% CI 0.639 to 1.023, p=0.077).

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic did not markedly alter the functioning of the emergency network. Although stroke patient management deteriorated, the resilience of the STEMI pathway was linked to its stronger structuring. Transversal reorganisations, aiming at concentrating resources on emergency care, contributed to maintenance of the quality of care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04979208.

Development and evaluation of the accuracy of an indicator of the appropriateness of interventional cardiology generated from a French registry

Background

Development of appropriateness indicators of medical interventions has become a major quality-of-care issue, especially in the domain of interventional cardiology (IC). The objective of this study was to develop and evaluate the accuracy of an indicator of the appropriateness of interventional cardiology acts (invasive coronary angiographies (ICA) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)) in patients with coronary stable disease and silent ischemia, automated from a French registry.

Methods

All ICA and PCI recorded in a Regional IC Registry (ACIRA) and operated for a stable coronary artery disease or silent ischemia from January 1st to December 31th 2013 in eight IC hospitals of Aquitaine, southwestern France, were included.

The indicator was developed to reflect European guidelines. Classification of appropriateness by the indicator, measured on the registry database, was compared to the classification of a reference standard (expert judgment applied through complete record review) on a random sample of 300 interventions.

Accuracy parameters were estimated. A second version of the indicator was defined, based on the analysis of false negative and positive results, and its accuracy estimated.

Results

The second indicator accuracy was: sensitivity 63.5% (95% confidence interval CI [51.7–75.3]), specificity 76.0% (95%CI [70.4–81.6]), PPV 43.0% (95% CI [33.0–53.0]) and NPV 88.0% (95% CI [83.4–92.6]). When stratified on the type of act, parameters were better for ICA alone than for PCI.

Conclusions

Accuracy of the indicator should raise with improvement of database quality. Despite its average accuracy, it is already used as a benchmark indicator for cardiologists. It is sent annually to each IC center with value of the indicator at the region level to allow a comparison.

[Linking Interventional Cardiology clinical registry data with French hospital administrative data: Development and validation of deterministic record linkage]

BACKGROUND

To recreate the in-hospital healthcare pathway for patients treated with coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, we linked the interventional cardiology registry (ACIRA) and the pseudonymized French hospital medical information system database (PMSI) in the Aquitaine region. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a deterministic merging algorithm between these exhaustive and complementary databases.

METHODS

After a pre-treatment phase of the databases to standardize the 11 identified linking variables, a deterministic linking algorithm was developed on ACIRA hospital stays between December 2011 and December 2014 in nine interventional cardiology centers as well as the data from the consolidated PMSI databases of the Aquitaine region from 2011 to 2014. Merging was carried out through 12 successive steps, the first consisting in strict linking of the 11 variables. The performance of the algorithm was analyzed in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Strategies complementary to the initial algorithm (change in the order of variables and base preprocessing) were tested. Comparative analysis of merged/unmerged patients explored potential causes of mismatch.

RESULTS

The algorithm found 97.2% of the 31,621 ACIRA stays to have sensitivity of 99.9% (95% CI [99.9; 99.9]), specificity of 97.9% (95% CI [97.7; 98.1]), PPV of 99.9% (95% CI [99.9; 99.9]) and NPV of 96.9% (95% CI [96.7; 97.1]). Complementary strategies did not yield better results. The unmerged patients were older, and hospitalized mostly in 2012 in two interventional cardiology centers.

CONCLUSION

This study underscored the feasibility and validity of an indirect deterministic pairing to routinely link a registry of practices using hospital data to pseudonymized medico-administrative databases. This method, which can be extrapolated to other health events leading to hospitalization, renders it possible to effectively reconstruct patients' hospital healthcare pathway.