1
|
Chea M, Rigolot L, Canali A, Vergez F. Minimal Residual Disease in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Old and New Concepts. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2150. [PMID: 38396825 PMCID: PMC10889505 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25042150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimal residual disease (MRD) is of major importance in onco-hematology, particularly in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MRD measures the amount of leukemia cells remaining in a patient after treatment, and is an essential tool for disease monitoring, relapse prognosis, and guiding treatment decisions. Patients with a negative MRD tend to have superior disease-free and overall survival rates. Considerable effort has been made to standardize MRD practices. A variety of techniques, including flow cytometry and molecular methods, are used to assess MRD, each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. MRD is recognized not only as a predictive biomarker, but also as a prognostic tool and marker of treatment efficacy. Expected advances in MRD assessment encompass molecular techniques such as NGS and digital PCR, as well as optimization strategies such as unsupervised flow cytometry analysis and leukemic stem cell monitoring. At present, there is no perfect method for measuring MRD, and significant advances are expected in the future to fully integrate MRD assessment into the management of AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias Chea
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
| | - Lucie Rigolot
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
- School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - Alban Canali
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
- School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France
| | - Francois Vergez
- Laboratoire d’Hématologie Biologique, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France; (M.C.); (L.R.); (A.C.)
- School of Medicine, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Row C, Lechevalier N, Vial JP, Mimoun A, Bastie JN, Lafon I, Pigneux A, Leguay T, Callanan M, Maynadie M, Béné MC, Dumas PY, Guy J. Prognostic value of postinduction medullary myeloid recovery by flow cytometry in acute myeloid leukemia. EJHAEM 2024; 5:84-92. [PMID: 38406512 PMCID: PMC10887270 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Risk stratification and treatment response evaluation are key features in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) management. Immunophenotypic and molecular approaches all rely on the detection of persisting leukemic cells by measurable residual disease techniques. A new approach is proposed here by assessing medullary myeloid maturation by flow cytometry through a myeloid progenitor ratio (MPR). The normal MPR range was defined using reference normal bone marrows (n = 48). MPR was considered balanced if between 1 and 4 and unbalanced if < 1 or > 4. MPR was retrospectively assessed at baseline and post-induction for 206 newly diagnosed AML patients eligible for intensive treatment from two different French centers. All AML baseline MPR were unbalanced and thus significantly different from normal MPR (p < 0.0001). Patients with an unbalanced MPR after induction had worse 3-year overall survival (OS) (44.4% vs. 80.2%, HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 1.81-4.84, p < 0.0001) and 3-year relapse free survival (RFS) (38.7% vs. 64.4%, HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.39-3.18, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, postinduction unbalanced MPR was significantly associated with shorter OS and RFS regardless of the European LeukemiaNet 2010 risk stratification or NPM1/FLT3-ITD status. A balanced postinduction MPR conversely conferred favorable outcomes and reflects medullary myeloid recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Row
- Service d'Hématologie BiologiqueCHU de DijonDijonFrance
- University of Burgundy‐ISITE‐BFC‐Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) UMR1231Faculty of MedicineDijonFrance
| | | | | | - Aguirre Mimoun
- Service d'Hématologie BiologiqueCHU de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Jean Noel Bastie
- University of Burgundy‐ISITE‐BFC‐Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) UMR1231Faculty of MedicineDijonFrance
- Service d'Hématologie CliniqueCHU de DijonDijonFrance
| | - Ingrid Lafon
- Service d'Hématologie BiologiqueCHU de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Arnaud Pigneux
- Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie CellulaireCHU de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Thibaut Leguay
- Service d'Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie CellulaireCHU de BordeauxBordeauxFrance
| | - Mary Callanan
- University of Burgundy‐ISITE‐BFC‐Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) UMR1231Faculty of MedicineDijonFrance
| | - Marc Maynadie
- Service d'Hématologie BiologiqueCHU de DijonDijonFrance
- University of Burgundy‐ISITE‐BFC‐Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) UMR1231Faculty of MedicineDijonFrance
| | - Marie C. Béné
- CRCI2NA INSERM UMR 1307 & CNRS UMR 6075 Université de NantesNantesFrance
| | | | - Julien Guy
- Service d'Hématologie BiologiqueCHU de DijonDijonFrance
- University of Burgundy‐ISITE‐BFC‐Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) UMR1231Faculty of MedicineDijonFrance
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nguyen PC, Nguyen V, Baldwin K, Kankanige Y, Blombery P, Came N, Westerman DA. Computational flow cytometry provides accurate assessment of measurable residual disease in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2023; 202:760-770. [PMID: 37052611 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
Undetectable measurable residual disease (MRD) is associated with favourable clinical outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). While assessment is commonly performed using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC), this approach is associated with limitations including user bias and expertise that may not be widely available. Implementation of unsupervised clustering algorithms in the laboratory can address these limitations and have not been previously reported in a systematic quantitative manner. We developed a computational pipeline to assess CLL MRD using FlowSOM. In the training step, a self-organising map was generated with nodes representing the full breadth of normal immature and mature B cells along with disease immunophenotypes. This map was used to detect MRD in multiple validation cohorts containing a total of 456 samples. This included an evaluation of atypical CLL cases and samples collected from two different laboratories. Computational MRD showed high correlation with expert analysis (Pearson's r > 0.99 for typical CLL). Binary classification of typical CLL samples as either MRD positive or negative demonstrated high concordance (>98%). Interestingly, computational MRD detected disease in a small number of atypical CLL cases in which MRD was not detected by expert analysis. These results demonstrate the feasibility and value of automated MFC analysis in a diagnostic laboratory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phillip C Nguyen
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vuong Nguyen
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kylie Baldwin
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Yamuna Kankanige
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Piers Blombery
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Neil Came
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - David A Westerman
- Department of Pathology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Walter W, Pohlkamp C, Meggendorfer M, Nadarajah N, Kern W, Haferlach C, Haferlach T. Artificial intelligence in hematological diagnostics: Game changer or gadget? Blood Rev 2023; 58:101019. [PMID: 36241586 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2022.101019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The future of clinical diagnosis and treatment of hematologic diseases will inevitably involve the integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based systems into routine practice to support the hematologists' decision making. Several studies have shown that AI-based models can already be used to automatically differentiate cells, reliably detect malignant cell populations, support chromosome banding analysis, and interpret clinical variants, contributing to early disease detection and prognosis. However, even the best tool can become useless if it is misapplied or the results are misinterpreted. Therefore, in order to comprehensively judge and correctly apply newly developed AI-based systems, the hematologist must have a basic understanding of the general concepts of machine learning. In this review, we provide the hematologist with a comprehensive overview of various machine learning techniques, their current implementations and approaches in different diagnostic subfields (e.g., cytogenetics, molecular genetics), and the limitations and unresolved challenges of the systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wencke Walter
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 München, Germany.
| | - Christian Pohlkamp
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 München, Germany.
| | - Manja Meggendorfer
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 München, Germany.
| | - Niroshan Nadarajah
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 München, Germany.
| | - Wolfgang Kern
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 München, Germany.
| | - Claudia Haferlach
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 München, Germany.
| | - Torsten Haferlach
- MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory, Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377 München, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porwit A, Béné MC, Duetz C, Matarraz S, Oelschlaegel U, Westers TM, Wagner-Ballon O, Kordasti S, Valent P, Preijers F, Alhan C, Bellos F, Bettelheim P, Burbury K, Chapuis N, Cremers E, Della Porta MG, Dunlop A, Eidenschink-Brodersen L, Font P, Fontenay M, Hobo W, Ireland R, Johansson U, Loken MR, Ogata K, Orfao A, Psarra K, Saft L, Subira D, Te Marvelde J, Wells DA, van der Velden VHJ, Kern W, van de Loosdrecht AA. Multiparameter flow cytometry in the evaluation of myelodysplasia: Analytical issues: Recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet/International Myelodysplastic Syndrome Flow Cytometry Working Group. CYTOMETRY. PART B, CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2023; 104:27-50. [PMID: 36537621 PMCID: PMC10107708 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.22108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is one of the essential ancillary methods in bone marrow (BM) investigation of patients with cytopenia and suspected myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). MFC can also be applied in the follow-up of MDS patients undergoing treatment. This document summarizes recommendations from the International/European Leukemia Net Working Group for Flow Cytometry in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (ELN iMDS Flow) on the analytical issues in MFC for the diagnostic work-up of MDS. Recommendations for the analysis of several BM cell subsets such as myeloid precursors, maturing granulocytic and monocytic components and erythropoiesis are given. A core set of 17 markers identified as independently related to a cytomorphologic diagnosis of myelodysplasia is suggested as mandatory for MFC evaluation of BM in a patient with cytopenia. A myeloid precursor cell (CD34+ CD19- ) count >3% should be considered immunophenotypically indicative of myelodysplasia. However, MFC results should always be evaluated as part of an integrated hematopathology work-up. Looking forward, several machine-learning-based analytical tools of interest should be applied in parallel to conventional analytical methods to investigate their usefulness in integrated diagnostics, risk stratification, and potentially even in the evaluation of response to therapy, based on MFC data. In addition, compiling large uniform datasets is desirable, as most of the machine-learning-based methods tend to perform better with larger numbers of investigated samples, especially in such a heterogeneous disease as MDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Porwit
- Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marie C Béné
- Hematology Biology, Nantes University Hospital, CRCINA Inserm 1232, Nantes, France
| | - Carolien Duetz
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sergio Matarraz
- Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-USAL/CSIC), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service, Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL) and CIBERONC, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Uta Oelschlaegel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Carl-Gustav-Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Theresia M Westers
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Orianne Wagner-Ballon
- Department of Hematology and Immunology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, University Hospital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
- Inserm U955, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | | | - Peter Valent
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology & Hemostaseology and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Frank Preijers
- Laboratory of Hematology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Canan Alhan
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter Bettelheim
- Department of Hematology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Elisabethinen, Linz, Austria
| | - Kate Burbury
- Department of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicolas Chapuis
- Laboratory of Hematology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université de Paris, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
- Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, CNRS UMR, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eline Cremers
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Matteo G Della Porta
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alan Dunlop
- Department of Haemato-Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Patricia Font
- Department of Hematology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon-IiSGM, Madrid, Spain
| | - Michaela Fontenay
- Laboratory of Hematology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université de Paris, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
- Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, CNRS UMR, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Willemijn Hobo
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology & Hemostaseology and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Robin Ireland
- Department of Haematology and SE-HMDS, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ulrika Johansson
- Laboratory Medicine, SI-HMDS, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Kiyoyuki Ogata
- Metropolitan Research and Treatment Centre for Blood Disorders (MRTC Japan), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Alberto Orfao
- Cancer Research Center (IBMCC-USAL/CSIC), Department of Medicine and Cytometry Service, Institute for Biomedical Research of Salamanca (IBSAL) and CIBERONC, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Katherina Psarra
- Department of Immunology - Histocompatibility, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Leonie Saft
- Clinical Pathology and Cancer Diagnostics, Karolinska University Hospital and Institute Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dolores Subira
- Department of Hematology, Flow Cytometry Unit, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
| | - Jeroen Te Marvelde
- Laboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Vincent H J van der Velden
- Laboratory Medical Immunology, Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjan A van de Loosdrecht
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Béné MC, Porwit A. Mixed Phenotype/Lineage Leukemia: Has Anything Changed for 2021 on Diagnosis, Classification, and Treatment? Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1015-1022. [PMID: 35380407 PMCID: PMC9249706 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01252-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Recent advances in the small field of the rare mixed phenotype acute leukemias (MPAL) are presented focusing on a better understanding of their pathophysiology and search for better therapeutic approaches. Recent Findings Three aspects of respective classification, therapy, and immunophenotype of MPAL are reviewed. New proposals have been made to segregate MPAL subtypes based on their genomic landscape. In parallel, it was found that a large array of therapeutic approaches has been tested in the past few years with increasingly good results. Finally, we explored the use of unsupervised flow cytometry analysis to dissect subtle variations in markers expression to better characterize the variegating aspect of MPALs. Summary Genomic and immunophenotypic aspects more clearly link MPAL subtypes with bona fide acute myeloblastic of lymphoblastic leukemias. This is likely to impact therapeutic strategies, towards a better management and outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie C. Béné
- Hematology Biology, Faculty of Medicine and Inserm, CHU de Nantes, CRCI2NA, INSERM UMR 1307 & CNRS UMR 6075 Nantes, France
| | - Anna Porwit
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology and Pathology, Lund University, Sölvegatan 25b, 22185 Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heuser M, Freeman SD, Ossenkoppele GJ, Buccisano F, Hourigan CS, Ngai LL, Tettero JM, Bachas C, Baer C, Béné MC, Bücklein V, Czyz A, Denys B, Dillon R, Feuring-Buske M, Guzman ML, Haferlach T, Han L, Herzig JK, Jorgensen JL, Kern W, Konopleva MY, Lacombe F, Libura M, Majchrzak A, Maurillo L, Ofran Y, Philippe J, Plesa A, Preudhomme C, Ravandi F, Roumier C, Subklewe M, Thol F, van de Loosdrecht AA, van der Reijden BA, Venditti A, Wierzbowska A, Valk PJM, Wood BL, Walter RB, Thiede C, Döhner K, Roboz GJ, Cloos J. 2021 Update on MRD in acute myeloid leukemia: a consensus document from the European LeukemiaNet MRD Working Party. Blood 2021; 138:2753-2767. [PMID: 34724563 PMCID: PMC8718623 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021013626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 316] [Impact Index Per Article: 105.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an important biomarker in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is used for prognostic, predictive, monitoring, and efficacy-response assessments. The European LeukemiaNet (ELN) MRD Working Party evaluated standardization and harmonization of MRD in an ongoing manner and has updated the 2018 ELN MRD recommendations based on significant developments in the field. New and revised recommendations were established during in-person and online meetings, and a 2-stage Delphi poll was conducted to optimize consensus. All recommendations are graded by levels of evidence and agreement. Major changes include technical specifications for next-generation sequencing-based MRD testing and integrative assessments of MRD irrespective of technology. Other topics include use of MRD as a prognostic and surrogate end point for drug testing; selection of the technique, material, and appropriate time points for MRD assessment; and clinical implications of MRD assessment. In addition to technical recommendations for flow- and molecular-MRD analysis, we provide MRD thresholds and define MRD response, and detail how MRD results should be reported and combined if several techniques are used. MRD assessment in AML is complex and clinically relevant, and standardized approaches to application, interpretation, technical conduct, and reporting are of critical importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Heuser
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sylvie D Freeman
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Gert J Ossenkoppele
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Francesco Buccisano
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Christopher S Hourigan
- Laboratory of Myeloid Malignancy, Hematology Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Lok Lam Ngai
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse M Tettero
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Costa Bachas
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marie-Christine Béné
- Department of Hematology and Biology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Veit Bücklein
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna Czyz
- Department of Hematology, Blood Neoplasms, and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Barbara Denys
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University
| | - Richard Dillon
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monica L Guzman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Julia K Herzig
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Francis Lacombe
- Hematology Biology, Flow Cytometry, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | | | - Agata Majchrzak
- Department of Experimental Hematology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital, Lodz, Poland
| | - Luca Maurillo
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Yishai Ofran
- Department of Hematology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center Faculty of Medicine Hebrew University, Jerusalem Israel
| | - Jan Philippe
- Department of Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University
| | - Adriana Plesa
- Department of Hematology Laboratory, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Lyon, France
| | | | | | | | - Marion Subklewe
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Felicitas Thol
- Department of Hematology, Hemostasis, Oncology, and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arjan A van de Loosdrecht
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bert A van der Reijden
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Adriano Venditti
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, Hematology, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Peter J M Valk
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Brent L Wood
- Department of Hematopathology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, CA
| | - Roland B Walter
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Christian Thiede
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany; and
- AgenDix GmbH, Dresden, Germany
| | - Konstanze Döhner
- Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Gail J Roboz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jacqueline Cloos
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
CD158k and PD-1 expressions define heterogeneous subtypes of Sezary syndrome. Blood Adv 2021; 6:1813-1825. [PMID: 34570200 PMCID: PMC8941477 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
SS can be divided into 3 subtypes, each with a different immune environment and response to treatment.
Sezary syndrome (SS) is a rare leukemic form of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Diagnosis mainly depends on flow cytometry, but results are not specific enough to be unequivocal. The difficulty in defining a single marker that could characterize Sezary cells may be the consequence of different pathological subtypes. In this study, we used multivariate flow cytometry analyses. We chose to investigate the expression of classical CD3, CD4, CD7, and CD26 and the new association of 2 markers CD158k and PD-1. We performed lymphocyte computational phenotypic analyses during diagnosis and follow-up of patients with SS to define new SS classes and improve the sensitivity of the diagnosis and the follow-up flow cytometry method. Three classes of SS, defined by different immunophenotypic profiles, CD158k+ SS, CD158k−PD-1+ SS, CD158k and PD-1 double-negative SS, showed different CD8+ and B-cell environments. Such a study could help to diagnose and define biological markers of susceptibility/resistance to treatment, including immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
9
|
The Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell CD123+ Compartment in Acute Leukemia with or without RUNX1 Mutation: High Inter-Patient Variability Disclosed by Immunophenotypic Unsupervised Analysis and Clustering. HEMATO 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/hemato2030036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDC) constitute a small subset of normal bone marrow (BM) cells but have also been shown to be present, sometimes in large numbers, in several hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1 mutation, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia or, obviously, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms. These cells have been reported to display somewhat variable immunophenotypic features in different conditions. However, little is known of their plasticity within individual patients. Using an unsupervised clustering tool (FlowSOM) to re-visit flow cytometry results of seven previously analyzed cases of hematological malignancies (6 acute myeloid leukemia and one chronic myelomonocytic leukemia) with a PDC contingent, we report here on the unexpectedly high variability of PDC subsets. Although five of the studied patients harbored a RUNX1 mutation, no consistent feature of PDCs could be disclosed as associated with this variant. Moreover, the one normal single-node small subset of PDC detected in the merged file of six normal BM could be retrieved in the remission BM samples of three successfully treated patients. This study highlights the capacity of unsupervised flow cytometry analysis to delineate cell subsets not detectable with classical supervised tools.
Collapse
|
10
|
Béné MC, Lacombe F, Porwit A. Unsupervised flow cytometry analysis in hematological malignancies: A new paradigm. Int J Lab Hematol 2021; 43 Suppl 1:54-64. [PMID: 34288436 DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Ever since hematopoietic cells became "events" enumerated and characterized in suspension by cell counters or flow cytometers, researchers and engineers have strived to refine the acquisition and display of the electronic signals generated. A large array of solutions was then developed to identify at best the numerous cell subsets that can be delineated, notably among hematopoietic cells. As instruments became more and more stable and robust, the focus moved to analytic software. Almost concomitantly, the capacity increased to use large panels (both with mass and classical cytometry) and to apply artificial intelligence/machine learning for their analysis. The combination of these concepts raised new analytical possibilities, opening an unprecedented field of subtle exploration for many conditions, including hematopoiesis and hematological disorders. In this review, the general concepts and progress achieved in the development of new analytical approaches for exploring high-dimensional data sets at the single-cell level will be described as they appeared over the past few years. A larger and more practical part will detail the various steps that need to be mastered, both in data acquisition and in the preanalytical check of data files. Finally, a step-by-step explanation of the solution in development to combine the Bioconductor clustering algorithm FlowSOM and the popular and widely used software Kaluza® (Beckman Coulter) will be presented. The aim of this review was to point out that the day when these progresses will reach routine hematology laboratories does not seem so far away.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie C Béné
- Hematology Biology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.,CRCINA Inserm, Nantes, France
| | - Francis Lacombe
- Hematology Biology, Cytometry Department, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Anna Porwit
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Genetics and Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vial JP, Lechevalier N, Lacombe F, Dumas PY, Bidet A, Leguay T, Vergez F, Pigneux A, Béné MC. Unsupervised Flow Cytometry Analysis Allows for an Accurate Identification of Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:629. [PMID: 33562525 PMCID: PMC7914957 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13040629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The assessment of minimal residual disease (MRD) is increasingly considered to monitor response to therapy in hematological malignancies. In acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML), molecular MRD (mMRD) is possible for about half the patients while multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is more broadly available. However, MFC analysis strategies are highly operator-dependent. Recently, new tools have been designed for unsupervised MFC analysis, segregating cell-clusters with the same immunophenotypic characteristics. Here, the Flow-Self-Organizing-Maps (FlowSOM) tool was applied to assess MFC-MRD in 96 bone marrow (BM) follow-up (FU) time-points from 40 AML patients with available mMRD. A reference FlowSOM display was built from 19 healthy/normal BM samples (NBM), then simultaneously compared to the patient's diagnosis and FU samples at each time-point. MRD clusters were characterized individually in terms of cell numbers and immunophenotype. This strategy disclosed subclones with varying immunophenotype within single diagnosis and FU samples including populations absent from NBM. Detectable MRD was as low as 0.09% in MFC and 0.051% for mMRD. The concordance between mMRD and MFC-MRD was 80.2%. MFC yielded 85% specificity and 69% sensitivity compared to mMRD. Unsupervised MFC is shown here to allow for an easy and robust assessment of MRD, applicable also to AML patients without molecular markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Philippe Vial
- Hematology Biology, Flow Cytometry, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France; (J.P.V.); (N.L.); (F.L.)
| | - Nicolas Lechevalier
- Hematology Biology, Flow Cytometry, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France; (J.P.V.); (N.L.); (F.L.)
| | - Francis Lacombe
- Hematology Biology, Flow Cytometry, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France; (J.P.V.); (N.L.); (F.L.)
| | - Pierre-Yves Dumas
- Service d’Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France; (P.-Y.D.); (T.L.); (A.P.)
| | - Audrey Bidet
- Hematology Biology, Molecular Hematology, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France;
| | - Thibaut Leguay
- Service d’Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France; (P.-Y.D.); (T.L.); (A.P.)
| | - François Vergez
- Hematology Biology, IUCT Oncopôle, Toulouse University Hospital, 31000 Toulouse, France;
| | - Arnaud Pigneux
- Service d’Hématologie Clinique et de Thérapie Cellulaire, Bordeaux University Hospital, 33600 Pessac, France; (P.-Y.D.); (T.L.); (A.P.)
| | - Marie C. Béné
- Hematology Biology, Nantes University Hospital, 44000 Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Definition of Erythroid Differentiation Subsets in Normal Human Bone Marrow Using FlowSOM Unsupervised Cluster Analysis of Flow Cytometry Data. Hemasphere 2020; 5:e512. [PMID: 33364551 PMCID: PMC7755522 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
13
|
Eckardt JN, Bornhäuser M, Wendt K, Middeke JM. Application of machine learning in the management of acute myeloid leukemia: current practice and future prospects. Blood Adv 2020; 4:6077-6085. [PMID: 33290546 PMCID: PMC7724910 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020002997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is rapidly emerging in several fields of cancer research. ML algorithms can deal with vast amounts of medical data and provide a better understanding of malignant disease. Its ability to process information from different diagnostic modalities and functions to predict prognosis and suggest therapeutic strategies indicates that ML is a promising tool for the future management of hematologic malignancies; acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a model disease of various recent studies. An integration of these ML techniques into various applications in AML management can assure fast and accurate diagnosis as well as precise risk stratification and optimal therapy. Nevertheless, these techniques come with various pitfalls and need a strict regulatory framework to ensure safe use of ML. This comprehensive review highlights and discusses recent advances in ML techniques in the management of AML as a model disease of hematologic neoplasms, enabling researchers and clinicians alike to critically evaluate this upcoming, potentially practice-changing technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Niklas Eckardt
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Bornhäuser
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden (NCT/UCC), Dresden, Germany
- German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany; and
| | - Karsten Wendt
- Institute of Circuits and Systems, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jan Moritz Middeke
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Davydova YO, Parovichnikova EN, Galtseva IV, Kokhno AV, Dvirnyk VN, Kovrigina AM, Obukhova TN, Kapranov NM, Nikiforova KA, Glinkina SA, Troitskaya VV, Mikhailova EA, Fidarova ZT, Moiseeva TN, Lukina EA, Tsvetaeva NV, Nikulina OF, Kuzmina LA, Savchenko VG. Diagnostic significance of flow cytometry scales in diagnostics of myelodysplastic syndromes. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2020; 100:312-321. [PMID: 33052634 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) can present a challenge for clinicians. Multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) can aid in establishing a diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal MFC approach for MDS. METHODS The study included 102 MDS (39 low-grade MDS), 83 cytopenic patients without myeloid neoplastic disorders (control group), and 35 healthy donors. Bone marrow was analyzed using a six-color MFC. Analysis was conducted according to the "Ogata score," "Wells score," and the integrated flow cytometry (iFC) score. RESULTS The respective sensitivity and specificity values were 77.5% and 90.4% for the Ogata score, 79.4% and 81.9% for the Wells score, and 87.3% and 87.6% for the iFC score. Specificity was not 100% due to deviations of MFC parameters in the control group. Patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) had higher levels of CD34+ CD7+ myeloid cells than donors. Aplastic anemia and PNH were characterized by a high proportion of CD56+ cells among CD34+ precursors and neutrophils. The proportion of MDS-related features increased with the progression of MDS. The highest number of CD34+ blasts was found in MDS with excess blasts. MDS with isolated del(5q) was characterized by a high proportion of CD34+ CD7+ cells and low granularity of neutrophils. In 39 low-grade MDS, the sensitivities were 53.8%, 61.5%, and 71.8% for Ogata score, Wells score, and iFC, respectively. CONCLUSION The results support iFC as a useful diagnostic tool in MDS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia O Davydova
- Laboratory of Immunophenotyping, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena N Parovichnikova
- Chemotherapy Department for Hemoblastoses, Hemopoiesis Depression and BMT, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Irina V Galtseva
- Laboratory of Immunophenotyping, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alina V Kokhno
- Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy Department for Hemoblastoses and Hematopoiesis Depressions, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Valentina N Dvirnyk
- Centralized Diagnostic Laboratory, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alla M Kovrigina
- Department of Pathology, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatyana N Obukhova
- Karyology Laboratory, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nikolay M Kapranov
- Laboratory of Immunophenotyping, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Ksenia A Nikiforova
- Laboratory of Immunophenotyping, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Svetlana A Glinkina
- Department of Pathology, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Vera V Troitskaya
- Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy Department for Hemoblastoses and Hematopoiesis Depressions, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena A Mikhailova
- Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy Department for Hemoblastoses and Hematopoiesis Depressions, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zalina T Fidarova
- Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy Department for Hemoblastoses and Hematopoiesis Depressions, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Tatyana N Moiseeva
- Department of Hematology Advisory, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena A Lukina
- Department of Orphan Diseases, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nina V Tsvetaeva
- Department of Orphan Diseases, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga F Nikulina
- Department of Orphan Diseases, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | - Larisa A Kuzmina
- Department of Intensive High-Dose Chemotherapy and BMT, National Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russia
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Issue Highlights - July 2019. CYTOMETRY PART B-CLINICAL CYTOMETRY 2020; 96:253-255. [PMID: 31321907 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.21836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
16
|
Jacqmin H, Chatelain B, Louveaux Q, Jacqmin P, Dogné JM, Graux C, Mullier F. Clustering and Kernel Density Estimation for Assessment of Measurable Residual Disease by Flow Cytometry. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:E317. [PMID: 32443428 PMCID: PMC7277972 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10050317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Standardization, data mining techniques, and comparison to normality are changing the landscape of multiparameter flow cytometry in clinical hematology. On the basis of these principles, a strategy was developed for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. Herein, suspicious cell clusters are first identified at diagnosis using a clustering algorithm. Subsequently, automated multidimensional spaces, named "Clouds", are created around these clusters on the basis of density calculations. This step identifies the immunophenotypic pattern of the suspicious cell clusters. Thereafter, using reference samples, the "Abnormality Ratio" (AR) of each Cloud is calculated, and major malignant Clouds are retained, known as "Leukemic Clouds" (L-Clouds). In follow-up samples, MRD is identified when more cells fall into a patient's L-Cloud compared to reference samples (AR concept). This workflow was applied on simulated data and real-life leukemia flow cytometry data. On simulated data, strong patient-dependent positive correlation (R2 = 1) was observed between the AR and spiked-in leukemia cells. On real patient data, AR kinetics was in line with the clinical evolution for five out of six patients. In conclusion, we present a convenient flow cytometry data analysis approach for the follow-up of hematological malignancies. Further evaluation and validation on more patient samples and different flow cytometry panels is required before implementation in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugues Jacqmin
- Hematology Laboratory, NAmur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences (NARILIS), Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium; (B.C.); (F.M.)
| | - Bernard Chatelain
- Hematology Laboratory, NAmur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences (NARILIS), Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium; (B.C.); (F.M.)
| | | | | | | | - Carlos Graux
- Department of Hematology, Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium;
| | - François Mullier
- Hematology Laboratory, NAmur Research Institute for LIfe Sciences (NARILIS), Namur Thrombosis and Hemostasis Center (NTHC), CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, 5530 Yvoir, Belgium; (B.C.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cloos J, Ossenkoppele GJ, Dillon R. Minimal residual disease and stem cell transplantation outcomes. HEMATOLOGY. AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY. EDUCATION PROGRAM 2019; 2019:617-625. [PMID: 31808862 PMCID: PMC6913494 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2019000006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Risk classification and tailoring of treatment are essential for improving outcome for patients with acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Both patient and leukemia-specific characteristics assessed using morphology, cytogenetics, molecular biology, and multicolor flow cytometry are relevant at diagnosis and during induction, consolidation, and maintenance phases of the treatment. In particular, minimal residual disease (MRD) during therapy has potential as a prognostic factor of outcome, determination of response to therapy, and direction of targeted therapy. MRD can be determined by cell surface markers using multicolor flow cytometry, whereas leukemia-specific translocations and mutations are measured using polymerase chain reaction-based techniques and recently using next-generation sequencing. All these methods of MRD detection have their (dis)advantages, and all need to be standardized, prospectively validated, and improved to be used for uniform clinical decision making and a potential surrogate end point for clinical trials testing novel treatment strategies. Important issues to be solved are time point of MRD measurement and threshold for MRD positivity. MRD is used for stem cell transplantation (SCT) selection in the large subgroup of patients with an intermediate risk profile. Patients who are MRD positive will benefit from allo-SCT. However, MRD-negative patients have a better chance of survival after SCT. Therefore, it is debated whether MRD-positive patients should be extensively treated to become MRD negative before SCT. Either way, accurate monitoring of potential residual or upcoming disease is mandatory. Tailoring therapy according to MRD monitoring may be the most successful way to provide appropriate specifically targeted, personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline Cloos
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Gert J Ossenkoppele
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Richard Dillon
- Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King's College, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lacombe F, Lechevalier N, Vial JP, Béné MC. An R-Derived FlowSOM Process to Analyze Unsupervised Clustering of Normal and Malignant Human Bone Marrow Classical Flow Cytometry Data. Cytometry A 2019; 95:1191-1197. [PMID: 31577391 DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.23897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is a powerful and versatile tool to accurately analyze cell subsets, notably to explore normal and pathological hematopoiesis. Yet, mostly supervised subjective strategies are used to identify cell subsets in this complex tissue. In the past few years, the implementation of mass cytometry and the big data generated have led to a blossoming of new software solutions. Their application to classical MFC in hematology is however still seldom reported. Here, we show how one of these new tools, the FlowSOM R solution, can be applied, together with the Kaluza® software, to a new delineation of hematopoietic subsets in normal human bone marrow (BM). We thus combined the unsupervised discrimination of cell subsets provided by FlowSOM and their expert-driven node-by-node assignment to known or new hematopoietic subsets. We also show how this new tool could modify the MFC exploration of hematological malignancies both at diagnosis (Dg) and follow-up (FU). This can be achieved by direct comparison of merged listmodes of reference normal BM, Dg, and FU samples of a representative acute myeloblastic case tested with the same immunophenotyping panel. This provides an immediate unsupervised evaluation of minimal residual disease. © 2019 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis Lacombe
- Flow cytometry department, Hematology Laboratory, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Nicolas Lechevalier
- Flow cytometry department, Hematology Laboratory, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Jean Philippe Vial
- Flow cytometry department, Hematology Laboratory, Bordeaux University Hospital, Pessac, France
| | - Marie C Béné
- Hematology Biology, Nantes University Hospital, CRCINA, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|