1
|
Strongyli E, Evangelidis P, Sakellari I, Gavriilaki M, Gavriilaki E. Change in Neurocognitive Function in Patients Who Receive CAR-T Cell Therapies: A Steep Hill to Climb. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:591. [PMID: 38794161 PMCID: PMC11123727 DOI: 10.3390/ph17050591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy with chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapies has brought substantial improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory B cell neoplasms. However, complications such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) limit the therapeutic efficacy of this treatment approach. ICANS can have a broad range of clinical manifestations, while various scoring systems have been developed for its grading. Cognitive decline is prevalent in CAR-T therapy recipients including impaired attention, difficulty in item naming, and writing, agraphia, and executive dysfunction. In this review, we aim to present the diagnostic methods and tests that have been used for the recognition of cognitive impairment in these patients. Moreover, up-to-date data about the duration of cognitive impairment symptoms after the infusion are presented. More research on the risk factors, pathogenesis, preventive measures, and therapy of neurocognitive impairment is crucial for better outcomes for our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evlampia Strongyli
- Hematology Department and Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Unit, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.S.); (I.S.)
| | - Paschalis Evangelidis
- Second Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Ioanna Sakellari
- Hematology Department and Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Unit, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.S.); (I.S.)
| | - Maria Gavriilaki
- 1st Department of Neurology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54636 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Eleni Gavriilaki
- Hematology Department and Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT) Unit, G. Papanicolaou Hospital, 57010 Thessaloniki, Greece; (E.S.); (I.S.)
- Second Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Hippocration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54642 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elgohary G, Yang Y, Gergis M, Yi D, Gergis U. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T - Cell Therapy for Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients with Central Nervous System Involvement, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2024; 24:e142-e151. [PMID: 38267353 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CAR T-cell) therapy is an effective treatment for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, patients with central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma were excluded in most of the CAR T-cell therapy trials. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy with CAR T-cell therapy in LBCL patients with CNS involvement. Two reviewers independently searched PubMed and Cochrane Library to identify all published literature associated with United States Food and Drug Administration approved CAR T-cell therapies for LBCL. Patients with CNS LBCL were included. Meta-analysis of proportion was performed to evaluate the overall response (ORR), complete response (CR) for efficacy, and cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome for safety assessment. Nineteen studies were qualified for inclusion with 141 CNS LBCL patients. The ORR and CR rates were 61% and 55% respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 8.8 months, and the median progression free survival (PFS) was 4.4 months. Severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (grade≥3) were reported in 25% (32/130) patients and severe cytokine release syndrome (grade≥3) were found in 10% (13/124) of the patients. The safety and efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in CNS LBCL patients appears comparable to patients without CNS involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | - Usama Gergis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schreiber B, Tripathi S, Nikiforow S, Chandraker A. Adoptive Immune Effector Cell Therapies in Cancer and Solid Organ Transplantation: A Review. Semin Nephrol 2024; 44:151498. [PMID: 38555223 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Cancer is one of the most devastating complications of kidney transplantation and constitutes one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. Immunosuppression, although effective in preventing allograft rejection, inherently inhibits immune surveillance against oncogenic viral infections and malignancy. Adoptive cell therapy, particularly immune effector cell therapy, has long been a modality of interest in both cancer and transplantation, though has only recently stepped into the spotlight with the development of virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Although these modalities are best described in hematopoietic cell transplantation and hematologic malignancies, their potential application in the SOT setting may hold tremendous promise for those with limited therapeutic options. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the development of adoptive cell therapies with a focus on virus-specific T-cell therapy and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We also describe the current experience of these therapies in the SOT setting as well as the challenges in their application and future directions in their development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany Schreiber
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sudipta Tripathi
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sarah Nikiforow
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anil Chandraker
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yamshon S, Gribbin C, Chen Z, Demetres M, Pasciolla M, Alhomoud M, Martin P, Shore T. Efficacy and Toxicity of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:73.e1-73.e12. [PMID: 37279856 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is poorly understood, given the paucity of available data in this patient population. There is a theoretical risk of compromising transplanted organ function with CAR T cell therapy; conversely, organ transplantation-related immunosuppression can alter the function of CAR T cells. Given the prevalence of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease, which often can be difficult to treat with conventional chemoimmunotherapy, understanding the risks and benefits of delivering lymphoma-directed CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is of utmost importance. We sought to determine the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients as well as the associated adverse effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and compromised solid organ transplant function. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult recipients of solid organ transplant who received CAR T cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary outcomes included efficacy, defined as overall response (OR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival, and overall survival, as well as rates of CRS and ICANS. Secondary outcomes included rates of transplanted organ loss, compromised organ function, and alterations to immunosuppressant regimens. After a systematic literature review and 2-reviewer screening process, we identified 10 studies suitable for descriptive analysis and 4 studies suitable for meta-analysis. Among all patients, 69% (24 of 35) achieved a response to CAR T cell therapy, and 52% (18 of 35) achieved a CR. CRS of any grade occurred in 83% (29 of 35), and CRS grade ≥3 occurred in 9% (3 of 35). Sixty percent of the patients (21 of 35) developed ICANS, and 34% (12 of 35) developed ICANS grade ≥3. The incidence of any grade 5 toxicity among all patients was 11% (4 of 35). Fourteen percent of the patients (5 of 35) experienced loss of the transplanted organ. Immunosuppressant therapy was held in 22 patients but eventually restarted in 68% of them (15 of 22). Among the studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled OR rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29.2% to 100%; I2 = 71%) and the pooled CR rate was 46% (95% CI, 25.4% to 67.8%; I2 = 29%). The rates of any grade CRS and grade ≥3 CRS were 88% (95% CI, 69% to 99%; I2 = 0%) and 5% (95% CI, 0% to 21%; I2 = 0%), respectively. The rates of any grade ICANS and ICANS grade ≥3 were 54% (95% CI, 9% to 96%; I2 = 68%) and 40% (95% CI, 3% to 85%; I2 = 63%), respectively. The efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is comparable to that in the general population as reported in prior investigational studies, with an acceptable toxicity profile in terms of CRS, ICANS, and transplanted organ compromise. Further studies are needed to determine long-term effects on organ function, sustained response rates, and best practices peri-CAR T infusion period in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Yamshon
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
| | - Caitlin Gribbin
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Zhengming Chen
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Michelle Demetres
- Samuel J. Wood Library & CV Starr Biomedical Information Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Michelle Pasciolla
- Department of Pharmacy, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Mohammad Alhomoud
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Peter Martin
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Tsiporah Shore
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kazzi C, Kuznetsova V, Siriratnam P, Griffith S, Wong S, Tam CS, Alpitsis R, Spencer A, O'Brien TJ, Malpas CB, Monif M. Cognition following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy: A systematic review. J Autoimmun 2023; 140:103126. [PMID: 37837807 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review aimed to characterise the cognitive outcomes of patients who received chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Medline, and CINAHL (February 2023). Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Checklist for Case Reports and the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Non-randomised Studies. RESULTS Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 1104 participants. There was considerable methodological heterogeneity with differing study designs (e.g., cohort studies, clinical trials, case studies, a qualitative interview, and a focus group), measures of cognition (e.g., self-report, neuropsychological measures, clinician assessed/neurological examinations), and longest follow-up time points (i.e., five days to five years). DISCUSSION Results of the studies were heterogenous with studies demonstrating stable, improved, or reduced cognition across differing time points. Overall, cognitive symptoms are common particularly in the acute stage (<2 weeks) post-infusion. Most deficits that arise in the acute stage resolve within one to two weeks, however, there is a subset of patients who continue to experience and self-report persistent deficits in the subacute and chronic stages. Future studies are needed to comprehensively analyse cognition using a combination of self-report and psychometric measures following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the acute, subacute, and chronic settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Kazzi
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Valeriya Kuznetsova
- Neuroimmunology Centre, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; CORe, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Pakeeran Siriratnam
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah Griffith
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shu Wong
- Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, VIC, Australia
| | - Constantine S Tam
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, VIC, Australia; Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, VIC, Australia
| | - Rubina Alpitsis
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Spencer
- Department of Haematology, Alfred Hospital, Central Clinical School, VIC, Australia; Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, VIC, Australia
| | - Terence J O'Brien
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Charles B Malpas
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Neuroimmunology Centre, Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Mastura Monif
- Department of Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Neurology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Portuguese AJ, Gauthier J, Tykodi SS, Hall ET, Hirayama AV, Yeung CCS, Blosser CD. CD19 CAR-T therapy in solid organ transplant recipients: case report and systematic review. Bone Marrow Transplant 2023; 58:353-359. [PMID: 36575360 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01907-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a leading cause of cancer death in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). Relapsed or refractory (R/R) PTLD portends a high risk of death and effective management is not well established. CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy has been utilized, but the risks and benefits are unknown. We report the first case of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) PTLD treated with lisocabtagene maraleucel and present a systematic literature review of SOTRs with PTLD treated with CD19 CAR-T therapy. Our patient achieved a complete response (CR) with limited toxicity but experienced a CD19+ relapse 8 months after infusion despite CAR-T persistence. Literature review revealed 14 DLBCL and 2 Burkitt lymphoma PTLD cases treated with CD19 CAR-T cells. Kidney (n = 12), liver (n = 2), heart (n = 2), and pancreas after kidney (n = 1) transplant recipients were analyzed. The objective response rate (ORR) was 82.4% (14/17), with 58.5% (10/17) CRs and a 6.5-month median duration of response. Among kidney transplant recipients, the ORR was 91.7% (11/12). Allograft rejection occurred in 23.5% (4/17). No graft failure occurred. Our analysis suggests that CD19 CAR-T therapy offers short-term effectiveness and manageable toxicity in SOTRs with R/R PTLD. Further investigation through larger datasets and prospective study is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Portuguese
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Jordan Gauthier
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Scott S Tykodi
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Evan T Hall
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Alexandre V Hirayama
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Cecilia C S Yeung
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christopher D Blosser
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Atallah-Yunes SA, Salman O, Robertson MJ. Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: Update on treatment and novel therapies. Br J Haematol 2023; 201:383-395. [PMID: 36946218 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is rare and heterogeneous lymphoid proliferations that occur as a result of immunosuppression following solid organ transplant (SOT) and haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) with the majority being driven by EBV. Although some histologies are similar to lymphoid neoplasms seen in immunocompetent patients, treatment of PTLD may be different due to difference in pathobiology and higher risk of treatment complications. The most common treatment approach in SOT PTLD after failing immunosuppression reduction (RIS) takes into consideration a risk-stratified sequential algorithm with rituximab +/- chemotherapy based on phase 2 studies. In HSCT PTLD, RIS alone and chemotherapy are usually ineffective making rituximab +/- RIS as the gold standard of frontline treatment. In this review, we give an update on the treatment of PTLD beyond RIS. We highlight the most recent studies that attempted to incorporate more aggressive chemotherapy regimens and novel treatments into the traditional risk-stratified sequential approach. We also discuss the role of EBV-cytotoxic T lymphocytes in treatment of EBV-driven PTLD. Other novel agents with potential role in PTLD will be discussed in addition to the challenges that could arise with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suheil Albert Atallah-Yunes
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology - Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Omar Salman
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology - Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michael J Robertson
- Lymphoma Program, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology - Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Human Regulatory T Cells: Understanding the Role of Tregs in Select Autoimmune Skin Diseases and Post-Transplant Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24021527. [PMID: 36675037 PMCID: PMC9864298 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play an important role in maintaining immune tolerance and homeostasis by modulating how the immune system is activated. Several studies have documented the critical role of Tregs in suppressing the functions of effector T cells and antigen-presenting cells. Under certain conditions, Tregs can lose their suppressive capability, leading to a compromised immune system. For example, mutations in the Treg transcription factor, Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), can drive the development of autoimmune diseases in multiple organs within the body. Furthermore, mutations leading to a reduction in the numbers of Tregs or a change in their function facilitate autoimmunity, whereas an overabundance can inhibit anti-tumor and anti-pathogen immunity. This review discusses the characteristics of Tregs and their mechanism of action in select autoimmune skin diseases, transplantation, and skin cancer. We also examine the potential of Tregs-based cellular therapies in autoimmunity.
Collapse
|
9
|
Blosser CD, Portuguese AJ, Santana C, Murakami N. Transplant Onconephrology: An Update. Semin Nephrol 2022; 42:151348. [PMID: 37209580 PMCID: PMC10330527 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2023.151348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Transplant onconephrology is a growing specialty focused on the health care of kidney transplant recipients with cancer. Given the complexities associated with the care of transplant patients, along with the advent of novel cancer therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen-receptor T cells, there is a dire need for the subspecialty of transplant onconephrology. The management of cancer in the setting of kidney transplantation is best accomplished by a multidisciplinary team, including transplant nephrologists, oncologists, and patients. This review addresses the current state and future opportunities for transplant onconephrology, including the roles of the multidisciplinary team, and related scientific and clinical knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher D Blosser
- Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Division of Nephrology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.
| | | | | | - Naoka Murakami
- Division of Renal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|