Prevalence and Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Physical Violence-Related Acquired Brain Injury Among Visitors to Justice Center in New York

"Using the right tools and addressing the right issue": A qualitative exploration to support better care for intimate partner violence, brain injury, and mental health

BACKGROUND

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a global public health crisis. Often repetitive and occurring over prolonged periods of time, IPV puts survivors at high risk of brain injury (BI). Mental health concerns are highly prevalent both among individuals who have experienced IPV and those who have experienced BI, yet the interrelatedness and complexity of these three challenges when experienced together is poorly understood. This qualitative study explored care provision for IPV survivors with BI (IPV-BI) and mental health concerns from the perspectives of both survivors and providers.

METHODS

This qualitative interpretive description study was part of a broader research project exploring employment, mental health, and COVID-19 implications for survivors of IPV-BI. Participants (N = 24), including survivors and service providers, participated in semi-structured group and individual interviews between October 2020 and February 2021. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed.

FINDINGS

Four themes were developed from interview findings: 1) identifying BI and mental health as contributing components to survivors' experiences is critical to getting appropriate care; 2) supporting survivors involves a "toolbox full of strategies" and a flexible approach; 3) connecting and collaborating across sectors is key; and 4) underfunding and systemic barriers hinder access to care. Finally, we share recommendations from participants to better support IPV survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying both BI and mental health concerns among IPV survivors is critical to providing appropriate supports. Survivors of IPV experiencing BI and mental health concerns benefit from a flexible and collaborative approach to care; health and social care systems should be set up to support these collaborative approaches.

The Intersection of Intimate Partner Violence, Strangulation, and Brain Injury Screening: A Pilot Project

BACKGROUND

Survivors of intimate partner violence are at a high risk for having a brain injury because of high rates of strangulation and head and face injuries sustained from physical abuse. In addition to acute physical injuries, survivors experience various health complications.

PROBLEM

Many survivors do not seek medical attention for their injuries, and when they do, their brain injury often goes unrecognized and untreated. Research indicates that screening for brain injury can be an effective intervention to increase the identification of brain injuries and medical referrals for diagnosis and treatment. Unfortunately, brain injury screening is not a standard of care.

METHODS

Shelter-seeking clients were routinely screened for brain injury using a modified HELPS screening tool. A positive screen prompted a medical referral.

INTERVENTION

A modified HELPS screening tool was utilized with permission for the project.

RESULTS

Before implementation, 36 individuals entered shelter, 0 were screened for brain injury, and the medical referral rate was 19.4% (n = 7). After implementation, 40 clients entered shelter, 36 were screened for brain injury, 77.8% (n = 28) screened positive, and the medical referral rate was 80.6% (n = 29).

CONCLUSIONS

Brain injury screening may be an effective evidence-based intervention for shelter-seeking survivors of intimate partner violence to increase medical referrals.

Clinician perspectives on characteristics and care of traumatic brain injury among asylum seekers and refugees

PURPOSE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disproportionately affects asylum-seekers and refugees (ASR), although underdiagnosed and undertreated. Our study assesses clinicians' perspectives on characteristics and management of TBI among ASR, with the hope of improving TBI management in this population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted six focus groups of 16 clinicians across two academic medical centers in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. Clinicians in our sample included primary care clinicians, nurse practitioners, social workers, psychologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and neuropsychologists. We analyzed the qualitative data following a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analytic approach.

RESULTS

Clinicians characterized TBI among ASR as mostly mild and remote, involving head strikes, perpetrated predominantly by interpersonal violence and strangulation-related brain injury, and involving symptom overlap with mental health diagnoses, challenging diagnosis. Clinicians also described inadequate screening, the importance of connecting the physical and psychological symptoms of the brain injury rather than viewing them as distinct, and addressing diagnosis-related stigma and shame. Finally, they discussed lack of TBI-specific knowledge among providers and patients alike, and resource limitations affecting the continuum of care for this population.

CONCLUSION

Integrating clinicians' perspectives in caring for this population allows us to best meet their needs, including in TBI recovery.

Imaging of alert patients after non-self-inflicted strangulation: MRI is superior to CT

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of CT and MRI reports of alert patients presenting after non-self-inflicted strangulation (NSIS) and evaluate the appropriateness of these imaging modalities in NSIS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of patient characteristics and strangulation details, with a comparison of original radiology reports (ORR) to expert read-outs (EXR) of CT and MRI studies of all NSIS cases seen from 2008 to 2020 at a single centre.

RESULTS

The study included 116 patients (71% women, p < .001, χ2), with an average age of 33.8 years, mostly presenting after manual strangulation (97%). Most had experienced intimate partner violence (74% of women, p < .001, χ2) or assault by unknown offender (88% of men, p < 0.002 χ2). Overall, 132 imaging studies (67 CT, 51% and 65 MRI, 49%) were reviewed. Potentially dangerous injuries were present in 7%, minor injuries in 22%, and no injuries in 71% of patients. Sensitivity and specificity of ORR were 78% and 97% for MRI and 30% and 98% for CT. Discrepancies between ORR and EXR occurred in 18% of all patients, or 62% of injured patients, with a substantial number of unreported injuries on CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that MRI is more appropriate than CT for alert patients presenting after non-self-inflicted strangulation and underline the need for radiologists with specialist knowledge to report these cases in order to add value to both patient care and potential future medico-legal investigations.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

MRI should be preferred over CT for the investigation of strangulation related injuries in alert patients because MRI has a higher accuracy than CT and does not expose this usually young patient population to ionizing radiation.

KEY POINTS

• Patients presenting after strangulation are often young women with a history of intimate partner violence while men typically present after assault by an unknown offender. • Expert read-outs of CT and MRI revealed potentially dangerous injuries in one of 14 patients. • MRI has a significantly higher sensitivity than CT and appears to be more appropriate for the diagnostic workup of alert patients after strangulation.

Neurological Care of Refugees and Other Forcibly Displaced Persons

There are more than 100 million forcibly displaced persons (FDPs) in the world today, including a high number of people who experience neurologic symptoms and presentations. This review summarizes the conceptual frameworks for understanding neurological health risks and conditions across the migration journey (premigration, migration journey, and postmigration) and life span, including special attention to pediatric FDPs. The interaction with psychiatric illness is discussed, as well as the available published data on neurologic presentations in FDPs in the medical literature. A social determinant of health lens is used to provide ways in which forcible displacement can influence brain health and neurological outcomes. Priorities and future needs for the neurological care of refugees and other FDPs are suggested.

Association Between Lifetime Sexual Violence and Recent Traumatic Brain Injury Among Adults: 2017 Connecticut Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Sexual violence (SV) is a critical public health problem that is associated with numerous negative health consequences, including immediate- and long-term physical and mental health conditions and health-risk behaviors. Some of these health-risk behaviors (e.g., substance use, unsafe driving practices, poor mental health, lower impulse control, and abnormal brain circuitry) might increase the risk for sustaining a traumatic brain injury (TBI). A TBI causes neurological or neuropsychological changes and may also lead to various symptoms that affect a person's cognition, mobility, behavior, and mental health. Determining if those who have experienced SV are at increased risk of sustaining a TBI in their lifetime is critical given the high prevalence and health impacts of SV, the potential vulnerability to TBI after SV, and the known detrimental effects of TBI. This exploratory study examined data from the 2017 Connecticut behavioral risk factor surveillance system and found that lifetime SV victimization (controlling for age and sex) was associated with increased odds of reporting a recent TBI in the past 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.03, 4.21]). Further research is needed to better understand how SV history is related to the risk of sustaining a TBI. Healthcare professionals can support patients who experience SV by providing resources to help reduce associated physical and mental health conditions and health-risk behaviors.

Differences in Symptom Report by Survivors With and Without Probable Intimate Partner Violence-Related Brain Injury

Survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) are at heightened risk of sustaining a brain injury (BI). Problematically, a high overlap between BI and trauma symptoms leads to difficulties in identifying when an IPV-related BI has occurred. This paper investigated differences in symptom reports between survivors with (n = 95) and without (n = 42) probable IPV-related BI. Chi-squared analyses isolated a constellation of symptoms found to be specifically associated with BI status. These symptomatic markers may assist professionals in discerning BI from other comorbid conditions present in IPV, and thus help survivors access BI-specific treatments and resources.

Head Trauma in Refugees and Asylum Seekers: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Refugees and asylum seekers are at risk of head trauma. They endure blows to the head due to exigent circumstances necessitating resettlement (e.g., torture, war, interpersonal violence) and during their dangerous journeys to refuge. Our objective was to assess the global prevalence of head trauma in refugees and asylum seekers and describe its clinical characteristics in this population.

METHODS

The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020173534). PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant studies. We included all studies in English that comprised refugees or asylum seekers of any age and examined the prevalence or characteristics of head trauma. We excluded studies that were not peer-reviewed original research. Information was recorded on the prevalence of head trauma, method of ascertaining head trauma, severity, mechanism of injury, other trauma exposures, and comorbidities. Descriptive analyses and narrative syntheses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included, of which 13 with 6,038 refugees and asylum seekers reported head trauma prevalence. Prevalence estimates ranged from 9% to 78%. Heterogeneity among studies precluded meta-analysis. Most studies were US based (n = 9, 41%), followed by the Middle East (n = 5, 23%). Most refugees or asylum seekers were from the Middle East (n = 9, 41%), with those from Latin America least represented (n = 3, 14%). Studies disproportionately involved younger (pooled mean age = 29 years) adult samples composed of men. Recruitment settings were predominantly hospitals/clinics (n = 14, 64%), followed by refugee camps (n = 3, 14%). The most common mechanism of injury was direct impact through a beating or blow to the head. Studies varied greatly in how head trauma was defined and ascertained; no study used a validated traumatic brain injury (TBI)-specific screening tool. Similarly, TBI severity was not uniformly assessed, although hospital-based samples captured more moderate-to-severe head injuries. Mental health comorbidities were more frequently documented rather than physical health ones. Only 2 studies included a comparison with local populations.

DISCUSSION

Refugees and asylum seekers are vulnerable to head trauma, but studies using systematic approaches to screening are lacking. Increased attention to head trauma in displaced populations will allow for optimizing equitable care for this growing vulnerable population.

Exploring the intersection of brain injury and mental health in survivors of intimate partner violence: A scoping review

Rationale

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most commonly occurring form of violence against women. The most common site of injury in IPV is the head, face, and neck, resulting in possible brain injury (BI). Independently, mental health (MH) concerns are highly prevalent among both IPV survivors and individuals with BI; however, no systematic review exists on the combined experience of BI and MH in IPV.

Objective

The aim of this review was to describe the identification of and relationships between BI, MH, and IPV in the literature and the implications for health policy and practice.

Methods

A search strategy including text words and subject headings related to BI, IPV, and MH was developed for MEDLINE and translated to EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion. Articles discussing MH, BI, and IPV in relation to one another were included in the review.

Results

Twenty-eight articles were identified for inclusion. Methods for identifying IPV, BI, and MH were highly variable across studies. Fourteen studies reported significantly higher MH scores in IPV survivors with BI than in those without BI. Articles predominantly focused on cis gender women in heterosexual relationships and the impact of race and ethnicity were largely overlooked. Healthcare access was explored by eight articles, though none discussed the implications of co-occurring BI and MH.

Conclusion

Brain injury and MH are highly prevalent among IPV survivors; however, little research discusses the implication for healthcare. Future research should explore healthcare-related needs and experiences to inform policy and practice and better represent the diversity of IPV survivors.

Survey of depressive symptomatology in brain injury resulting from intimate partner violence

OBJECTIVE

A high prevalence of depression exists in specific sub-samples of survivors of brain injury (BI) sustained from intimate partner violence (IPV). However, the experience of depression by survivors of IPV-related BI from general civilian populations remains unclear. This study documents the symptom profile of depression reported by individuals who screened positive for sustaining an IPV-related BI.

METHODS

36 individuals who screened positive for possible IPV-related BI completed the Beck Depression Inventory-2^nd Edition (BDI-II). Subscales characterizing the nature of the symptoms were created. Frequency and descriptive statistics were calculated for item responses on the BDI-II. Participants were also assigned to high or low symptom severity groups to examine between-group differences.

RESULTS

Participants endorsed experiencing somatic symptoms more severely than self-evaluative and affective symptoms. Additionally, self-evaluative and cognitive symptoms correlated with total BDI-II scores for the high symptom severity group but not for the low symptom severity group.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight somatic symptoms of depression, in particular as a common experience among survivors of IPV-related BI. Further, self-evaluative and cognitive symptoms may be more sensitive in detecting depression after IPV-related BI. These results may aid in the development of guidelines to better diagnose and treat depression in IPV-related BI.

Brain Injury and Intimate Partner Violence

The aim of this topical issue on Brain Injury (BI) and Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is to address a long neglected gap in research, education and practice in both the IPV and BI literature. The need for practitioners, decision-policy makers and affected women to be aware of the co-occurrence of IPV and BI has only increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. BI in this issue includes traumatic brain injury and also potential hypoxic ischemic brain injuries from strangulation assaults. This novel issue includes a broad range of contributions led by authors from the US, Canada and Australia using a variety of methodologies. Topics covered improve our understanding characteristics and outcomes of non-fatal strangulation and neurobehavioral symptoms in both survivors and perpetrators. New data on neuroimaging correlates of IPV related BI is presented as well as prevalence of IPV and BI in diverse contexts. This collection also addresses the impact of IPV in both service users and providers during the COVID-19 pandemic and reports on an emergency summit from a diverse set of stakeholders from a national IPV-TBI knowledge the practice network. Further, this issue highlights the impact of a promising health advocacy intervention that offers tools that can be downloaded and provides information about a newly formed Partner Inflicted Task Force. We are optimistic that the papers in this issue will further the field and prepare the way for additional research that will expand knowledge of IPV-related BI to other understudied groups yet to be examined.