RANIBIZUMAB FOR RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: Predictive Factors and Long-Term Outcomes in Real-Life Data

Three-Year Outcomes of VEGF Inhibitors in Naive Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Fight Retinal Blindness!

PURPOSE

To evaluate the 3-year outcomes of VEGF inhibitors in the treatment of cystoid macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) in an international multicenter cohort of eyes.

DESIGN

Multicenter, international, BRVO database study.

SUBJECTS

Seven hundred forty-seven patients (760 eyes) undergoing intravitreal therapy for BRVO for 3 years in a multicenter international setting.

METHODS

Demographics, visual acuity (VA) in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters, central subfield thickness (CST), treatments, number of injections, and visits data was collected using a validated web-based tool.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity gain at 3 years in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters. Secondary outcome measures included anatomical results, treatment pattern, and percentage of completers. A subgroup analysis by study drug was conducted for clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean adjusted VA change was +11 letters (95% confidence interval 9-13), mean adjusted change in CST was -176 μm (-193, -159). Median number of injections/visits was 16 of 24 at 3 years of follow-up. Most eyes received VEGF inhibitors exclusively (89%, n = 677) and as a monotherapy in 71% (n = 538). Few eyes were switched to steroids (11%, n = 83). Suspensions in treatment >180 days occurred in 26% of study eyes. Aflibercept showed greater CST reductions (-147 vs. -128 vs. -114 μm; P < 0.001) and significantly lower switching rates (14% vs. 38% vs. 33%; P < 0.001) compared with ranibizumab and bevacizumab, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This international study of 3-year BRVO outcomes after starting treatment with VEGF inhibitors found adequate visual and anatomical results in routine clinical care. Visual outcomes were similar among the different initiating VEGF inhibitors, although eyes starting with aflibercept had better anatomical outcomes and a lower switching rate.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Integrated Assessment of OCT, Multimodal Imaging, and Cytokine Markers for Predicting Treatment Responses in Retinal Vein Occlusion Associated Macular Edema: A Comparative Review of Anti-VEGF and Steroid Therapies

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a significant cause of vision loss, characterized by the occlusion of retinal veins, leading to conditions such as central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Macular edema (ME), a prevalent consequence of RVO, is the primary cause of vision impairment in affected patients. Anti-VEGF agents have become the standard treatment, showing efficacy in improving visual acuity (VA) and reducing ME. However, a subset of patients exhibit a suboptimal response to anti-VEGF therapy, necessitating alternative treatments. Corticosteroids, which address inflammatory pathways implicated in ME, have shown promise, particularly in cases resistant to anti-VEGF. This review aims to identify biomarkers that predict treatment response to corticosteroids in RVO-associated ME, utilizing multimodal imaging and cytokine assessments. Baseline imaging, including SD-OCT and OCT-A, is essential for evaluating biomarkers like hyperreflective foci (HRF), serous retinal detachment (SRF), and central retinal thickness (CRT). Elevated cytokine levels, such as IL-6 and MCP-1, correlate with ME severity and poor anti-VEGF response. Early identification of these biomarkers can guide timely transitions to corticosteroid therapy, potentially enhancing treatment outcomes. The practical conclusion of this review is that integrating biomarker assessment into clinical practice enables personalized treatment decisions, allowing for earlier and more effective management of RVO-associated ME by transitioning patients to corticosteroid therapy when anti-VEGF agents are insufficient. Advanced diagnostics and machine learning may further refine personalized treatment strategies, improving the management of RVO-associated ME.

Vitreoretinal Interface Abnormalities in Patients With Retinal Vein Occlusion in a Tertiary Referral Center

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of vitreoretinal interface (VRI) disorders in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and to evaluate the impact of VRI abnormalities on the treatment outcomes of macular edema secondary to RVO using intravitreal aflibercept.

METHODS

Participants in this prospective study were consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to RVO, who received intravitreal aflibercept injections. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed, and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) was performed to measure central subfield thickness (CST) and to evaluate the presence of VRI disorders, namely, vitreoretinal adhesion (VMA), vitreoretinal traction (VMT), epiretinal membrane (ERM), lamellar macular hole (LMH), and full-thickness macular hole (FTMH). The primary outcomes were the prevalence of various VRI disorders in patients with RVO and the impact of VRI disorders on BCVA and CST after aflibercept treatment in such patients.

RESULTS

At baseline, 16.1% of patients had VMA, 3.2% VMT, 18.3% ERM, and 1.1% LMH. There were a statistically significant improvement in BCVA and a decrease in CST in RVO patients over time. There was no statistically significant difference regarding BCVA and CST at baseline and until month 24 after treatment between patients with VRI disorders and those without VRI disorders. However, the mean number of injections during the follow-up period was higher in the group with VRI disorders (9.4±2.1) compared to those without VRI disorders (8.1±0.7, p=0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of VRI disorders in patients with RVO was 16.1% for VMA, 3.2% for VMT, 18.3% for ERM, and 1.1% for LMH. VRI disorders were not found to affect the anatomical and visual outcomes after intravitreal aflibercept treatment in patients with RVO, although more intravitreal injections were needed in patients with VRI disorders.

Central Retinal Thickness Variability as a Predictive Factor for Visual Acuity After Dexamethasone Implant in Retinal Vein Occlusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Investigate central retinal thickness (CRT) variability and changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) after 12 months in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implants.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Post hoc analyses of two randomized trials in patients with macular edema associated with branch or central RVO treated with a 0.7-mg dexamethasone implant. Central retinal thickness standard deviation (CRT-SD) and central retinal thickness amplitude (CRT-A) were measures of variability. Analyses included multinomial and simple linear regression.

RESULTS

In 400 patients, CRT-SD and CRT-A were significantly associated with central RVO, second dexamethasone implant, and baseline CRT. Baseline BCVA was associated with CRT-A. CRT-SD and CRT-A were significantly correlated with a 12-month change in BCVA (effect sizes of -0.032 and -0.013 letters/µm; P < 0.001). Patients in the highest CRT-SD quartile gained significantly fewer letters (+1.88 letters; 95% CI: -0.46 to 4.23).

CONCLUSION

Greater CRT variability was associated with smaller BCVA improvements in patients with RVO treated with dexamethasone implants. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].

Characteristics of macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion showing poor anatomic response to three loading anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections: an optical coherence tomography analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical features of refractory cystoid macular edema related to retinal vein occlusion associated with the response to three consecutive loading doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on retinal vein occlusion patients treated by three anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. They were divided into a group according to resolution of macular edema in optical coherence tomography (Group 1) and with persistent macular edema (Group 2). We analyzed qualitative and quantitative morphologic features of optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

We enrolled a total of 120 eyes from 120 patients (Group 1: n = 54, Group 2: n = 66). The baseline choroidal thickness differed significantly between groups 1 and 2 (290.70 ± 19.58 μm and 311.06 ± 17.87 μm P < 0.001). The presence of Hyperreflective foci (16.70% vs. 36.40% P < 0.001), Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (14.80% vs. 87.90%) and external limiting membrane disruption (16.60% vs. 39.3% P < 0.001) differed significantly. Logistic regression analysis showed that the initial central macular thickness (B = 0.012; P = 0.006), baseline choroidal thickness (B = 0.232; P = 0.016) and presence of hyperreflective foci (B = 1.050; P = 0.019), disorganization of the retinal inner layers (B = 1.132; P = 0.001) and external limiting membrane disruption (B = 1.575; P = 0.012) significantly affected the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment response.

CONCLUSION

A thicker sub-fovea choroid and the presence of hyperreflective foci, disruption of the external limiting membrane and disorganization of the retinal inner layers associated with a poorer response to three loading anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections in macular edema associated retinal vein occlusion.

Acute, Treatment-Naïve Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion in Younger Individuals: Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

Purpose: To compare the risk factors and clinical outcomes in patients younger than 50 years with acute, treatment-naïve branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) with outcomes in patients 50 years or older. Methods: Patients diagnosed with acute, treatment-naïve BRVO at Duke Eye Center over a 9.5-year period who had BRVO with onset 3 months or less before presentation, BRVO with macular involvement, and 12 months or more of follow-up were included. Demographic data, presenting clinical features, risk factors, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes were extracted during a retrospective review of medical records. Results: Of 302 patients identified, 23 were younger than 50 years (younger group) and 279 were 50 years or older (older group). Compared with older patients, younger patients had similar rates of hypertension (P = .275), diabetes mellitus (P = 1.000), smokers (P = .787), and open-angle glaucoma (P = .628). The younger group had a lower rate of hyperlipidemia than the older group (35% vs 59%) (P = .028). The 2 groups had similar presenting logMAR visual acuities (VAs) in the BRVO eye (P = .131). At the final follow-up, younger patients had significantly better logMAR VA in the BRVO-affected eye than older patients (mean 0.51 ± 0.65 vs 1.01 ± 1.20) (P = .016). The 2 groups had similar treatment burdens at 1 year (P = .516) and at the final follow-up (P = .782). Conclusions: Younger patients with acute, treatment-naïve BRVO have similar risk factors and treatment patterns as older patients, except for a lower rate of hyperlipidemia. Younger patients with BRVO may have similar presenting VA as older BRVO patients but better final VA, suggesting that age may be a potential prognostic factor.

OCT Grading System of Macular Infarction Predicts Vision in Participants With Central Retinal or Hemiretinal Vein Occlusion: A Secondary Analysis of SCORE2

PURPOSE

To determine whether macular infarction measured as hyper-reflectivity of the middle and inner retinal layers predicts long-term visual acuity outcomes in participants with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) or hemi-retinal vein occlusion (HRVO).

DESIGN

Clinical cohort study using post hoc secondary analysis of phase 3 clinical trial data.

METHODS

This post hoc secondary analysis of the phase 3 Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusions 2 (SCORE2) clinical trial included 310 of the 362 participants with macular edema secondary to CRVO/HRVO who were randomized to injections of aflibercept or bevacizumab. Month 01 (M01) optical coherence tomography (OCT) images were analyzed using the following grading scheme: no infarction (grade 0), only middle retinal infarction (grade 1), diffuse middle and patchy inner retinal infarction (grade 2), and diffuse middle and inner retinal infarction (grade 3). Visual acuity letter score (VALS), central subfield thickness (CST), and number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections were correlated with the infarction severity grade at month 01.

RESULTS

More severe macular infarction, with both middle and inner retinal layer hyper-reflectivity (ie, grades 2 and 3), was associated with worse M00 VALS and was predictive of VALS at M01 to M60 (P < .001). More severe infarction was associated with greater CST at presentation; however, after the first anti-VEGF injection, CST decreased and was similar across all grades at all time points (P > .05) with similar number of injections.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with more severe macular infarction at M01, as graded with OCT, exhibited worse visual outcomes despite significantly improved macular edema from month 6 to 5 years. This suggests that macular infarction may drive visual acuity after retinal fluid is treated with anti-VEGF.

Predictors of treatment outcomes following treat-and-extend regimen with aflibercept for branch retinal vein occlusion: post-hoc analysis of the PLATON trial

We investigated predictors of visual outcomes and injection interval in macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen. All 48 patients in a multicenter study were followed for 52 weeks and received three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections before the TAE regimen, with treatment intervals adjusted by 4 weeks, up to a maximum of 16 weeks. Various laboratory biomarkers and optical coherence tomography parameters were evaluated. Patients were classified into the extension failure group if they had ≥ 1 treatment interval decreased due to an increase in the central macular thickness compared to the previous visit and 18 patients were assigned to this group. In multivariate logistic analyses, presence of microaneurysms and prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM) sign, increased initial external limiting membrane (ELM) disruption, and higher total cholesterol were correlated with inhibiting a sustained extension in the injection interval (P = 0.015, P = 0.032, P = 0.037, P = 0.009, respectively). Therefore, in the patients with ME secondary to BRVO with these risk factors, early consideration of frequent injection may improve treatment outcome.

High Variation in Inner Retinal Reflectivity Predicts Poor Visual Outcome in Patients With Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: SCORE2 Report 21

Purpose

To assess the association of a novel spectral domain optical coherence tomography biomarker with 6-month visual acuity in in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2.

Methods

Spectral domain optical coherence tomography volume scans were evaluated for inner retinal hyperreflectivity, quantified by optical intensity ratio (OIR) and OIR variation. Baseline visual acuity letter score (VALS), baseline OCT biomarkers, and month 1 OIR were correlated with VALS at month 6. Regression trees, a machine learning technique yielding readily interpretable models, were used to assess for variable interaction.

Results

Only baseline VALS correlated positively with month 6 VALS in multivariate regression. Regression trees detected a novel functional and anatomical interaction in a subgroup. Among patients with a baseline VALS worse than 43, those with an OIR variation at month 1 of more than 0.09 had a mean of 13 fewer letters of vision at 6 months compared with patients with an OIR variation of 0.09 or less.

Conclusions

Baseline VALS was the strongest predictor of month 6 VALS. Regression tree analysis detected an interaction effect, in which higher OIR variation at month 1 predicted worse 6-month VALS in patients with low VALS at baseline. OIR variation may serve as a predictor for poor visual outcome despite treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in patients with poor vision at baseline.

Translational Relevance

Pixel heterogeneity in three-dimensional OCT data may serve as measure of disruption of the retinal laminations, and this factor may carry visually prognostic value.

Real-World Outcomes of Ranibizumab Treatment in French Patients with Visual Impairment due to Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Month Results from the BOREAL-RVO Study

INTRODUCTION

Information about real-world ranibizumab use is needed to optimize treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO). The BOREAL-RVO study assessed treatment use, effectiveness, and safety of 24-month treatment with ranibizumab 0.5 mg in patients with visual impairment due to macular edema secondary to RVO in a real-world setting.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, post-authorization, observational study in France, including patients starting ranibizumab for RVO. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 6. Secondary endpoints were mean changes from baseline in BCVA at month 24 and central retinal thickness (CRT) at months 6 and 24, and treatment use in real-world setting.

RESULTS

226 branch RVO (BRVO) and 196 central RVO (CRVO) patients were enrolled; 71.7% and 70.9% completed the 24-month follow-up, respectively. In BRVO, mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 55.2 (18.7) letters, with gains of 14.3 (13.7), 14.1 (16.5), 13.0 (17.5), and 11.4 (20.1) letters at months 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. In CRVO, mean (SD) baseline BCVA was 40.4 (25.6) letters, with gains of 16.0 (21.2), 9.5 (25.4), 9.2 (27.7), and 8.3 (23.8) letters at months 3, 6, 12, and 24, respectively. At month 24, 52% of BRVO and 41% of CRVO patients had gains of 15 or more letters. In BRVO, mean (SD) CRT values at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 550 (175), 315 (104), 343 (122), 335 (137), and 340 (105) μm. In CRVO, mean (SD) CRT values at baseline and months 3, 6, 12, and 24 were 643 (217), 327 (152), 400 (203), 379 (175), and 348 (161) μm. On average, BRVO patients had 3.8 injections for 6.9 visits by month 6, and 7.2 injections for 19.7 visits by month 24. CRVO patients had 2.7 injections for 4.2 visits by month 6 and 7.1 injections for 21.1 visits by month 24. Factors predictive of better BCVA gain at month 6 were age under 60 at baseline, lower baseline BCVA and BCVA gain at month 3. There were no new safety findings.

CONCLUSION

Major improvements in BCVA and CRT were observed at month 3 after the induction phase and then were sustained up to month 24, with a slight decrease, probably due to under-treatment. This study demonstrated ranibizumab to be a safe and effective treatment for BRVO and CRVO in the real-world setting, although more regular or proactive treatment could further improve outcomes.

New individualized aflibercept treatment protocol for branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema

We evaluated the long-term (24-month) efficacy of a novel individualized treatment protocol with 2 mg aflibercept for treatment-naive BRVO with macular edema. Each patient received an initial aflibercept injection and was then examined every 2 weeks until recurrence of edema. At recurrence, each patient received a second injection of aflibercept. The period of efficacy was defined as the time between the first and second injections. Subsequently, each patient was examined and re-injected with aflibercept at their personalized treatment interval, which was defined as 1 week shorter than the period of efficacy. Thirty-seven eyes of 48 patients showed recurrence after the initial injection. The mean period of efficacy was 92.5 ± 40.8 days, and the mean number of visits before recurrence, 7.6 ± 2.9. The mean 24-month best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was significantly better than the mean baseline BCVA but significantly worse than the best BCVA during the period of efficacy. The mean gain of BCVA at 24 months was 0.07 ± 0.18 logMAR. The mean 24-month central macular thickness (CMT) was significantly lower than the mean baseline CMT but showed no difference from the mean best CMT (p = 0.060). The mean total number of visits during the 24 months was 15.8 ± 3.4. We conclude that the individualized treatment protocol that was based on the period of efficacy in treatment-naïve BRVO eyes with macular edema achieved satisfactory long-term visual outcome.

Predictors of As-Needed Ranibizumab Injection Frequency in Patients With Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) biomarkers associated with ranibizumab injection frequency after 7 monthly doses in the prospective, multicenter SHORE study for macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

DESIGN

Prospective phase IV clinical trial data.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of 95 patients who received 7 monthly doses of ranibizumab followed by either pro re nata (PRN) or nonrandomized monthly injections from months 7-15 in eyes with macular edema secondary to RVO. Baseline SD-OCT biomarkers assessed include central subfield thickness (CST), epiretinal membrane presence, intraretinal and subretinal fluid, hyperreflective foci, disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), and disruption of the external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone, or interdigitation zone. Univariate and multivariable regression analyses evaluated the association between SD-OCT biomarkers and ranibizumab injection frequency.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 65.3 (SD, 12.7) years. Overall, 57.9% had BRVO/HRVO and 42.1% of eyes had CRVO. Mean BCVA improved (+17.5 [SD, 1.2] Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] letters) during the 7-month fixed dosing period, remaining stable from baseline (+20.1 [SD, 1.5] ETDRS letters) during the PRN phase from months 7-15. The mean number of PRN injections was 4.32 (SD, 2.35). On multivariate regression, greater baseline DRIL (β = 0.021, P = .0275) and higher CST at month 3 (β = 0.01, P < .001) were associated with a higher total number of PRN injections.

CONCLUSION

Greater baseline DRIL and higher CST at 3 months after starting ranibizumab treatment are associated with more frequent ranibizumab injections in PRN-treated patients with macular edema due to RVO.

PHASE 2 RANDOMIZED STUDY (ORION-1) OF A NOVEL, BIODEGRADABLE DEXAMETHASONE IMPLANT (AR-1105) FOR THE TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA DUE TO CENTRAL OR BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

PURPOSE

AR-1105 is a novel biodegradable sustained-release dexamethasone implant designed to deliver 6-month durability. This Phase 2 study evaluated two AR-1105 formulations with different release profiles in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Patients received a single intravitreal injection with 340 µg dexamethasone. In the initial phase, five patients received clinical formulation (CF) 1. In the randomized phase, 44 patients were randomized 1:1 to CF1 or CF2. The follow-up was 6 months. Patients had vision loss due to macular edema diagnosed ≥9 (central retinal vein occlusion) or ≥12 months (branch retinal vein occlusion) before screening, and could be treatment-naive or -experienced (if received prior steroids, must have demonstrated response).

RESULTS

Both formulations improved vision and reduced retinal thickening from baseline across all visits. At Month 6, mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity were +4.3 and +8.0 letters, and mean changes in central subfield thickness were -93 µm and -211 µm in CF1 and CF2 randomized patients, respectively. Most common adverse events were reduced visual acuity, worsening macular edema, conjunctival hemorrhage, and increased intraocular pressure. No patients required surgery or laser for intraocular pressure control.

CONCLUSION

Both formulations were well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful and sustained improvements in vision and retinal thickening in patients with retinal vein occlusion with longstanding edema.

Long-term real-world outcomes in retinal vein occlusions: How close are we to the trials?

Purpose

To assess and analyze the visual outcomes of patients with retinal vein occlusions in a real-world setting with a long-term follow-up of more than 5 years.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 56 patients having retinal vein occlusions from a tertiary eye center, with a mean follow-up of 7 years was performed. Primary outcome measures were mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, and final visit (≥5 years), proportion of patients having BCVA better than 20/40 and worse than 20/200, and mean number of injections. Secondary outcome measures were change in central macular thickness (CMT), development of subsequent retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in same eye or the other eye, and development of neovascular complications.

Results

The mean change in letter score was + 11.84 in branch RVO (BRVO), +7.14 in non-ischemic central RVO (CRVO), and -9.5 in ischemic CRVO at 1 year, which changed to + 8.57, -5 and - 24, respectively, at the end of follow-up. CMT had improved from 506 ± 98.8 μm, 576.44 ± 149 μm, and 618 ± 178.27 μm, respectively, at baseline to 267 ± 94 μm, 345.20 ± 122.61 μm, and 265.50 ± 107.75 μm, respectively, in BRVO, non-ischemic, and ischemic hemi RVO (HRVO)/CRVO groups. The total mean number of injections given in BRVO, non-ischemic CRVO, and ischemic CRVO groups were 4.6, 6.6, and 4.1, respectively. None of the patients with BRVO developed neovascular glaucoma (NVG). Non-ischemic to ischemic HRVO/CRVO conversion was noted in 4/11 eyes at a mean duration of 12.6 months. NVG was noted in 7/9 eyes (77.8%) in initial ischemic CRVO/HRVO group and 3/4 (75%) converted eyes.

Conclusion

Patients with BRVO have good visual outcomes with anti-VEGF, while in CRVO results may vary considerably owing to patient compliance and treatment burden on long-term follow-up in a real-world setting.

Central retinal vein occlusion 36-month outcomes with anti-vascular endothelial growth factors: the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry

PURPOSE

To analyze the 3-year outcomes in a broad population of patients starting VEGF inhibitors for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN

Observational database study.

PARTICIPANTS

Overall, 527 treatment-naïve CRVO eyes that commenced VEGF inhibitors between December 1, 2010 and 2018 were tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry.

METHODS

Longitudinal models were used to plot changes in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change in VA from baseline to 36 months, injections, visits, completion, switching, and suspensions of therapy > 180 days at the final review.

RESULTS

Overall (527 eyes) mean VA change (95% confidence interval [CI]) was + 10 (7, 12) letters, 37% had final VA ≥ 70 and 30% ≤ 35 letters, mean CST changed -306 μm. Completers (257/527, 49%) had mean 36-month changes in VA and CST of + 12 letters and -324 μm with a median of 18 injections at 26 visits. The adjusted mean VA change was similar to each VEGF inhibitor (mean, + 11.4 letters) despite a greater reduction in CST with aflibercept (-310 μm) versus ranibizumab (-258 μm) versus bevacizumab (-216 μm; P < 0.001). Eyes with baseline VA that was trial-eligible (19-73 letters; 356/527, 68%) gained 7 letters, very poor (< 19 letters; 129/527, 24%) gained 22 letters, or very good (> 73 letters; 42/527, 8%) lost 7 letters. Switching (160/527, 30%) was most often to aflibercept (79 eyes). By using suspensions and discontinuation reasons, we identified similar proportions had ceased therapy (154/527, 29%) and were still receiving it at 36 months (165/527, 31%). Only 62/527 eyes (12%) had resolution of macular edema without treatment for > 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CRVO that commenced VEGF inhibitors in routine care for whom follow-up was available had VA improvements of around 12 letters at 3 years, but with > 50% lost to follow-up, the VA outcome for the entire group was likely worse. The choice of VEGF inhibitor influenced CST but not VA outcomes. We estimated that around half of the eyes were still receiving injections after 36 months.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Characteristics of major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion

We compared the aqueous profiles, baseline characteristics, and clinical outcomes of 54 eyes with macular edema secondary to major branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and macular BRVO. We also identified the characteristics of poor responders to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections. Aqueous inflammatory cytokine and VEGF concentrations were significantly higher in major BRVO. In optical coherence tomography, major BRVO had a higher proportion with subretinal fluid, disorganization of retinal inner layers, and ellipsoid zone disruption. Comparing the clinical outcomes, major BRVO required more intravitreal anti-VEGF injections and had a poorer visual prognosis in the first 12 months. A significantly higher proportion of patients with major BRVO required additional treatments after 6 months compared to macular BRVO. Patients who responded poorly to anti-VEGF had higher aqueous VEGF levels and central subfield thickness (CST) at baseline. In conclusion, major BRVO patients required more and longer treatments, and had worse visual prognoses. BRVO that responds poorly to anti-VEGF had greater CST and higher aqueous VEGF levels at baseline.

Review: The Development of Risk Factors and Cytokines in Retinal Vein Occlusion

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most prevalent retinal disease. Despite this, the pathogenic mechanisms and risk factors are not entirely clear. In this article, we review recent publications on the classification, pathogenesis, risk factors, ischemic changes, cytokines, and vital complications of RVO. Risk factors and cytokines are important for exploring the mechanisms and new treatment targets. Furthermore, risk factors are interrelated, making RVO mechanisms more complex. Cytokines act as powerful mediators of pathological conditions, such as inflammation, neovascularization, and macular edema. This review aims to summarize the updated knowledge on risk factors, cytokines of RVO and signaling in order to provide valuable insight on managing the disease.

12-month outcomes of ranibizumab versus aflibercept for macular oedema in central retinal vein occlusion: data from the FRB! registry

PURPOSE

To compare 12-month treatment outcomes of eyes receiving aflibercept or ranibizumab for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

296 treatment-naïve eyes receiving either aflibercept (171 eyes, 2 mg) or ranibizumab (125 eyes, 0.5 mg) for macular oedema secondary to CRVO were recruited retrospectively from centres using the prospectively designed FRB! registry. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in LogMAR letter scores of visual acuity (VA). Secondary outcomes included change in central subfield thickness (CST), injections and visits, time to first grading of inactivity, switching and non-completion from baseline to 12 months.

RESULTS

Baseline VA (SD) was somewhat better in aflibercept- versus ranibizumab-treated eyes (42.5 ± 25.5 letters versus 36.9 ± 26 letters; p = 0.07) with similar CST (614 (240) μm versus 616 (234) μm: p = 0.95). The 12-month adjusted mean (95%CI) VA change was +16.6 (12.9, 20.4) letters for aflibercept versus +9.8 (5.5, 14.1) letters for ranibizumab (p = 0.001). The mean (95%CI) adjusted change in CST was significantly greater in aflibercept- versus ranibizumab-treated eyes: -304 (-276, -333) µm versus -252 (-220, -282) µm (p < 0.001). Both groups had a median (Q1, Q3) of 7 (5, 9) injections and 10 (8,13) visits. Aflibercept-treated eyes became inactive sooner than ranibizumab (p = 0.02). Switching occurred more commonly from ranibizumab (26 eyes, 21%) than from aflibercept (9 eyes, 5%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both aflibercept and ranibizumab improved VA and reduced CST in eyes with CRVO in routine clinical practice, with aflibercept showing significantly greater improvements in this comparative analysis.

Long-term outcomes of anti-VEGF treatment of retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To analyze the long-term outcomes of eyes with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) 8 years after commencing treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

Retrospective, multicentre study of 221 eyes diagnosed with RVO, which were commenced on anti-VEGF therapy between 2009 and 2011. VA and CRT were recorded at baseline and at subsequent annual time points. The mean number of injections administered each year and the incidence of adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Of a total of 221 eyes which commenced treatment with anti-VEGF agents for RVO, 95 were diagnosed with BRVO and 126 with CRVO. 8-year data were available for 94 eyes (43%). The mean age of patients was 65.1 ± 12.0 years. Mean VA improved from baseline by 16.9 letters, (57.8-74.7 letters), (P < 0.001). For BRVO eyes, mean VA improved from 60.5 to 74.8 letters (p < 0.001) and for CRVO eyes from 52.0 to 66.4 letters (p < 0.001). In all RVO eyes, there was a reduction in mean CRT from 501.0 to 249.1 µm; in BRVO eyes from 472.4 to 284.7 µm and in CRVO eyes from 533.9 to 267.5 µm. In the 8th year after starting treatment, eyes with RVO were receiving a mean of four injections.

CONCLUSION

Good long-term outcomes of VEGF inhibition for eyes with RVO were found in this study. Patients maintained a gain of 3-lines of vision 8-years after the commencing therapy. This encouraging result contrasts with long-term studies of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, where initial gains are lost over time.

Potential Prognostic Indicators for Patients With Retinal Vein Occlusion

The second most prevalent cause of retinal vascular disease is retinal vein occlusion (RVO). RVO raises intravascular pressure in the capillary and veins, triggering vessel barrier collapse and subsequent leaking of blood or plasma components into the tissue (edema). Macular edema (ME) is a major complication of RVO that results in significant visual impairment. Laser therapy, intravitreal steroid injections, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors are the major therapeutic techniques. Different therapies reduce ME of RVO and improve visual activity. However, some people have no impact on the resolution of ME, while others have a poor visual prognosis despite full ME cure. There are many investigators who studied the relationship between indicators of various instruments with visual activity. However, a summary of those findings is currently lacking. Therefore, we will focus on the predictive factors of different studies associated with positive visual activity outcomes, which would be very useful and important to help address both treatment expectations and methods for patients with RVO.

The impact of laboratory findings and optical coherence tomography biomarkers on response to intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment in patients with retinal vein occlusion

AIMS

To investigate potential laboratory and imaging biomarkers as treatment response predictors to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

Participants in this prospective study were 53 patients with treatment naïve macular edema secondary to RVO, treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents and followed-up for 12 months. At baseline, all participants underwent best-corrected visual acuity measurement, dilated fundoscopy, optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography (FFA), while full blood count and biochemical analysis of various parameters was also performed. At month 12, treatment response was examined and classified as "favorable" or "non-response". Potential associations between laboratory/imaging biomarkers and treatment response were assessed.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that "favorable" response at month 12 after initiation of anti-VEGF treatment was correlated with baseline central subfield thickness (CST) < 464 μm (p < 0.001), absence of subretinal fluid (p = 0.004), absence of hyperreflective foci (HF) (p = 0.004), intact ellipsoid zone (EZ) and external limiting membrane (ELM) (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively), absence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) (p = 0.020) and absence of macular ischemia on FFA (p < 0.001), while increased monocytes-to-lymphocytes ratio was also associated with "favorable" treatment response (p = 0.010). All other laboratory parameters did not reach statistical significance. However, at the multivariate analysis, EZ and ELM status, HF, macular ischemia and monocytes-to-lymphocytes ratio were found to be independent predictors of treatment response.

CONCLUSIONS

Intact EZ and ELM, absence of HF, absence of macular ischemia and increased monocytes-to-lymphocytes ratio at baseline can predict "favorable" treatment response in patients with treatment naïve macular edema secondary to RVO.

Changes in 12-month outcomes over time for age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion

Objectives

To identify whether the outcomes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in routine clinical practice have changed over time.

Methods

We analysed 12-month outcomes in treatment-naïve eyes that started aflibercept or ranibizumab for nAMD (3802 eyes), DMO (975 eyes), Branch RVO (BRVO, 357 eyes), Central RVO (CRVO, 371 eyes) and Hemi-RVO (HRVO, 54 eyes) from 2015 and 2019 tracked in the prospectively designed observational Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.

Results

The mean VA change at 12-month for each year between 2015 and 2019 remained stable or otherwise showed no discernible trends over time in eyes with nAMD (+3.3 to +6 letters), DMO (+3.6 to +6.7 letters) and RVO (+10.3 to +11.7 letters for BRVO, +5.9 to +17.7 letters for CRVO and 10.2 to 20.7 letters for HRVO). The median number of VEGF-inhibitor injections in eyes that completed 12-month follow-up also remained stable at 8–9 for nAMD, 6–7 for DMO, 7–9 for RVO. Fewer eyes (<one-fourth) that started treatment between 2015 and 2018 and more eyes starting in 2019 did not complete 12-month’s follow-up visit. The mean VA in non-completers at their last visit was higher than that of their baseline visit.

Conclusions

Treatment patterns and outcomes for nAMD, DMO and RVO in routine clinical practice have stabilised over the past 5 years at levels inferior to those reported by the pivotal phase 3 studies. A conscious effort to treat these conditions more intensively, or with longer lasting agents, would likely improve outcomes further in our patients.

The Quantification and Impact of Persistent Retinal Fluid Compartments on Best-Corrected Visual Acuity of Patients With Retinal Vein Occlusion

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of persistent intraretinal fluid (IRF) and subretinal fluid (SRF) on best visual acuity (BVA) of patients with retinal vein occlusions (RVOs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study observed 92 treatment-naïve patients with RVO during 12 months of treatment with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Deep learning was used to quantify IRF and SRF volumes, and linear mixed effects regression modeled the impact on BVA.

RESULTS

Average IRF volume declined -923.1 ± 2,382.5 nL from baseline to 12 months (P < .001). Average SRF volume declined -35.4 ± 223.4 nL from baseline to 12 months (P = .139). linear mixed effects regression modeling disclosed IRF≥ 1,616 nL at all time points predicted a -10.38 letter loss at 12 months (95% CI, -14.58 to -5.9 letters; P < .001). A similar relationship was not found for SRF.

CONCLUSION

Persistent IRF may be an important prognostic biomarker for BVA outcomes in real-world patients with RVO. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2022;53:139-147.].

Epiretinal Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Retinal Vein Occlusion: Visual and Morphologic Outcomes

Introduction

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and secondary ERM.

Methods

Retrospective, multicenter study including patients with RVO and ERM who underwent PPV and ERM peeling with or without phacoemulsification. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were recorded at the time of ERM peeling (baseline). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were longitudinally collected up to 36 months after surgery. Clinical factors associated with BCVA and CMT and disappearance of macular edema during follow-up were investigated.

Results

Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients with a median follow-up of 18 months were included. The BCVA improved significantly after ERM peeling (baseline vs. 24 months, p = 0.01). Absence of the external liming membrane/ellipsoid zone on OCT was associated with worse visual outcomes (regression estimate [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.93 [0.39–1.48] logMAR, p = 0.004). Eyes with disorganization of the inner retinal layers at baseline had higher CMT values at each visit (regression estimate [95% CI] = 114.1 [78.9–219.4] μm, p = 0.004). Older age at the time of RVO (p = 0.03) and branch RVO (p = 0.04) were risk factors for persistent macular edema after ERM removal.

Conclusion

PPV and ERM removal provided encouraging functional and morphological results in eyes with RVO, with disappearance of macular edema in most eyes. The integrity of the outer retina and preservation of inner retinal segmentation were associated with better visual and anatomical outcomes after ERM removal, respectively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00461-7.

[Long-term outcomes of anti-VEGF therapy for macular edema in retinal vein occlusion]

Antiangiogenic therapy (anti-VEGF) is the standard in the treatment of many retinal vascular diseases, including macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (RVO). A large evidentiary basis has been collected, consisting of randomized clinical trials in which anti-VEGF therapy demonstrated a significant advantage over laser photocoagulation and placebo in patients with RVO. However, in everyday clinical practice the results are not always comparable to randomized clinical trials. This review presents an analysis of the current studies based on actual clinical practice. Their results helped identify the main aspects of antiangiogenic therapy that could improve the treatment outcomes for patients with RVO. Additionally, the article discusses the predictive factors for therapy outcomes and the effect of anti-VEGF therapy on the development of neovascular complications in patients with ischemic RVO.

Is retinal vein occlusion associated with depression symptoms?: A nationwide cohort study

Retinal vessels share similar anatomical and physiological characteristics with the cerebral microvasculature, and abnormal cerebral blood flow is reportedly associated with depressive disorder. However, there is limited evidence regarding the relationship between depression and the risk of retinal vein occlusion (RVO). This study aimed to investigate the association between depression and the prospective risk of RVO using nationally representative longitudinal data. This retrospective, nationwide, population-based cohort study included 9,178,222 people aged 20 years or older who underwent the Korean National Health Screening Program examination in 2009. The depression group consisted of subjects whose initial diagnoses were made between 2009 and 2010 (n = 128,700). The predictive value for RVO was analyzed using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models.From the Kaplan-Meier curves, the depression group showed significantly higher RVO incidence probability, relative to the comparison group (P < .0001). After all confounding variables were adjusted, the hazard ratio of RVO in the depression group with or without recurrence was 1.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.076-1.338) and 1.087 (95% CI: 1.012-1.167), respectively, relative to the comparison group. This is the first nationwide, population-based, epidemiologic study that evaluated the association between depression and the risk of RVO development. The presence of depression was significantly associated with increased risks of RVO, and the recurrence of depression showed a higher RVO incidence probability.

Efficacy of Modified Treat-and-Extend Regimen of Aflibercept for Macular Edema from Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 2-Year Prospective Study Outcomes

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term (24-month) efficacy and safety of a modified treat-and-extend (mTAE) regimen of aflibercept for macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). This was a prospective multicenter intervention study. We evaluated 50 eyes in 50 patients with ME due to BRVO enrolled between October 2016 and September 2017. The patients received intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections according to a mTAE regimen for 24 months. This study reports the secondary endpoints of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfield thickness (CST) at 24 months and compares them with previously reported primary endpoints. Compared with baseline BCVA and CST of 0.33 (0.27) and 488 (165) µm (mean (standard deviation)), respectively, BCVA and CST were significantly improved at 12 and 24 months (12 months: 0.059 (0.19) LogMAR and 299 (112) µm; 24 months: 0.034 (0.18) LogMAR and 272 (81) µm, respectively; both p < 0.0001). Over the 24-month period, the mean number of IVA injections and clinic visits was 7.4 (3.3) and 11.1 (2.0), respectively. The mTAE regimen of IVA injections for ME due to BRVO was effective for improving BCVA and reducing CST over 24 months. This regimen shows promise for reducing the number of injections and clinic visits.

Outcomes of eyes with retinal vein occlusion that are lost to follow-up after antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To evaluate the outcomes of eyes with macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) that are lost to follow-up (LTFU) after antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections.

METHOD

A retrospective, single-centre, consecutive case series of RVO patients receiving injections who were LTFU >6 months was conducted. Data were collected from the visit before LTFU; return visit; 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after return; and the final visit.

RESULTS

Ninety eyes of 83 patients were included. Fifty (55.5%) eyes had branch RVO and 40 (44.5%) had central RVO. Mean LTFU duration was 277.8 days with additional mean follow-up for 748.1 days after return. Mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity (VA) (Snellen) at the visit before LTFU was 0.72 (20/105) which worsened on return [1.04 (20/219), p<0.001) and remained worse at all timepoints after return: 0.92 (20/166) at 3 months (p<0.001), 0.97 (20/187) at 6 months (p<0.001), 0.94 (20/174) at 12 months (p<0.001) and 1.01 (20/205) at final visit (p<0.001). Mean central foveal thickness (CFT) increased from 252 µm at the visit before LTFU to 396 µm at the return visit (p<0.001). No difference in CFT was noted by 3 months (258 µm, p=0.71), 6 months (241 µm, p=0.54) or 12 months after return (250 µm, p=0.95). CFT was thinner at the final visit (215 µm, p=0.018).

CONCLUSION

RVO patients receiving anti-VEGF injections who were LTFU experienced a decline in VA that did not return to the levels seen before LTFU despite improvement in CFT after restarting therapy, underscoring the importance of ongoing treatment.

Ellipsoid Zone Defects in Retinal Vein Occlusion Correlates With Visual Acuity Prognosis: SCORE2 Report 14

Purpose

To evaluate the association between ellipsoid zone (EZ) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and visual acuity letter score (VALS) in participants with retinal vein occlusion in the Study of Comparative Treatments for Retinal Vein Occlusion 2.

Methods

SD-OCT scans of 362 participants were qualitatively assessed at baseline and months 1, 6, 12, and 24 for EZ status as normal, patchy, or absent. The thickness of EZ layer in the central subfield was also obtained using machine learning.

Results

EZ assessments were not possible at baseline due to signal blockage in >75% of eyes. At month 1, EZ was normal in 37.6%, patchy in 48.1%, and absent in 14.3%. EZ was measurable in 48.7% with a mean area of 0.07 ± 0.16 mm². Mean VALS was better in eyes without an EZ defect compared to eyes with an EZ defect (P < 0.0001 at all visits). EZ defect at month 1 was associated with poorer VALS at all follow-up visits (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Both qualitative and quantitative assessments of EZ status strongly correlated with VALS. Absence of EZ was associated with poorer VALS at both corresponding and future visits, with larger areas of EZ loss associated with worse VALS.

Translational Relevance

Assessment of EZ can be used to identify patients with potentially poor response in eyes with retinal vein occlusion.

The impact of structural optical coherence tomography changes on visual function in retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

We aimed to determine the correlation between optical coherence tomography (OCT)‐ and demographic features and baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in treatment‐naïve patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

Methods

This was a cross‐sectional posthoc analysis of OCT images that included RVO patients from two prospective, open‐label, multicentre studies. The morphological grading was done manually, in the standardized setting of a reading centre. Main outcome measure was the estimated difference in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters associated with each individual biomarker.

Results

Included were 381/301 treatment‐naïve patients with BRVO/CRVO. For BRVO, statistically significant correlations with BCVA were seen for a 100 µm increase in central subfield thickness (CST; −3.1 letters), intraretinal cysts at centre point (CP; +4.1), subretinal fluid (SRF) at CP (+3.0) and hyperreflective foci (HRF) at the central B‐scan (−2.2). In CRVO, a 100 µm increase in CST was associated with a loss of −3.4 letters. In the total cohort, 100 µm increase in CST, SRF at CP and HRF at the central B‐scan correlated with a difference of −3.2,+3.2 and −2.0 letters. A 10‐year increase in age and female gender yielded a −2.0 and −2.5 letter decrease in the total cohort. Adjusted multiple R² for the respective group was 18.3%/26.3%/23.5%.

Conclusions

Of all parameters studied, only CST and age were consistently associated with worse BCVA in treatment‐naïve RVO patients. Morphology on OCT explained only a modest part of functional loss in this patient cohort.

Intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept versus bevacizumab for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the LEAVO non-inferiority three-arm RCT

BACKGROUND

Licensed ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 ml Lucentis®; Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland) and aflibercept (2 mg/0.05 ml Eylea®; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) and unlicensed bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml Avastin®; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) are used to treat macula oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion, but their relative clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and impact on the UK NHS and Personal Social Services have never been directly compared over the typical disease treatment period.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents for the management of macula oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion.

DESIGN

This was a three-arm, double-masked, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

SETTING

The trial was set in 44 UK NHS ophthalmology departments, between 2014 and 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 463 patients with visual impairment due to macula oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion were included in the trial.

INTERVENTIONS

The participants were treated with repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (n = 155), aflibercept (n = 154) or bevacizumab (n = 154).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was an increase in the best corrected visual acuity letter score from baseline to 100 weeks in the trial eye. The null hypothesis that aflibercept and bevacizumab are each inferior to ranibizumab was tested with a non-inferiority margin of -5 visual acuity letters over 100 weeks. Secondary outcomes included additional visual acuity, and imaging outcomes, Visual Function Questionnaire-25, EuroQol-5 Dimensions with and without a vision bolt-on, and drug side effects. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using treatment costs and Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index to measure quality-adjusted life-years.

RESULTS

The adjusted mean changes at 100 weeks in the best corrected visual acuity letter scores were as follows - ranibizumab, 12.5 letters (standard deviation 21.1 letters); aflibercept, 15.1 letters (standard deviation 18.7 letters); and bevacizumab, 9.8 letters (standard deviation 21.4 letters). Aflibercept was non-inferior to ranibizumab in the intention-to-treat population (adjusted mean best corrected visual acuity difference 2.23 letters, 95% confidence interval -2.17 to 6.63 letters; p = 0.0006), but not superior. The study was unable to demonstrate that bevacizumab was non-inferior to ranibizumab in the intention-to-treat population (adjusted mean best corrected visual acuity difference -1.73 letters, 95% confidence interval -6.12 to 2.67 letters; p = 0.071). A post hoc analysis was unable to demonstrate that bevacizumab was non-inferior to aflibercept in the intention-to-treat population (adjusted mean best corrected visual acuity difference was -3.96 letters, 95% confidence interval -8.34 to 0.42 letters; p = 0.32). All per-protocol population results were the same. Fewer injections were required with aflibercept (10.0) than with ranibizumab (11.8) (difference in means -1.8, 95% confidence interval -2.9 to -0.8). A post hoc analysis showed that more bevacizumab than aflibercept injections were required (difference in means 1.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 2.7). There were no new safety concerns. The model- and trial-based cost-effectiveness analyses estimated that bevacizumab was the most cost-effective treatment at a threshold of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.

LIMITATIONS

The comparison of aflibercept and bevacizumab was a post hoc analysis.

CONCLUSION

The study showed aflibercept to be non-inferior to ranibizumab. However, the possibility that bevacizumab is worse than ranibizumab and aflibercept by 5 visual acuity letters cannot be ruled out. Bevacizumab is an economically attractive treatment alternative and would lead to substantial cost savings to the NHS and other health-care systems. However, uncertainty about its relative effectiveness should be discussed comprehensively with patients, their representatives and funders before treatment is considered.

FUTURE WORK

To obtain extensive patient feedback and discuss with all stakeholders future bevacizumab NHS use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13623634.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 38. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Prospective trial of treat-and-extend regimen with aflibercept for branch retinal vein occlusion: 1-year results of the PLATON trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate the functional and anatomical outcomes of a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen with aflibercept for treatment-naive macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, noncomparative, open-label clinical trial. Forty-eight eyes of 48 patients received three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections prior to the TAE regimen. However, if the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was ≥ 20/20 and the central macular thickness (CMT) was < 250 μm during the loading phase, the patient immediately proceeded to the TAE regimen. The treatment interval was adjusted by 4 weeks based on changes in CMT. The primary outcome was the mean change in BCVA from baseline to 52 weeks.

RESULTS

The mean change in BCVA was 23.6 ± 14.2 letters. The proportion of patients with BCVA gain ≥ 15 letters was 77.1% at 24 weeks and 72.9% at 52 weeks. The mean reduction in CMT was 326.2 ± 235.6 μm at 24 weeks and 324.2 ± 238.0 μm at 52 weeks. The mean number of injections was 6.7 ± 1.2 (range: 6-11, all patients received three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections) over 52 weeks, and 34 patients (70.8%) reached the maximal extension interval of 16 weeks at 52 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

The TAE regimen using aflibercept for ME secondary to BRVO, which has a treatment interval of up to 16 weeks, showed comparable efficacy to the fixed-dosing regimen along with reduced treatment burden.

Real world evidence on 5661 patients treated for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, intravitreal dexamethasone or macular laser

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Clinical trials suggest anti-vascular endothelial growth factor is more effective than intravitreal dexamethasone as treatment for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. This study asks if 'real world' data from a larger and more diverse population, followed for a longer period, also support this conclusion.

METHODS

Data collected to support routine care at 27 NHS (National Health Service) Trusts between February 2002 and September 2017 contained 5661 treatment-naive patients with a single mode of treatment for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion and no history of cataract surgery either during or recently preceding the treatment. Number of treatment visits and change in visual acuity from baseline was plotted for three treatment groups (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), intravitreal dexamethasone, macular laser) for up to 3 years.

RESULTS

Mean baseline visual acuity was 57.1/53.1/62.3 letters in the anti-VEGF/dexamethasone/macular laser groups, respectively. This changed to 66.72 (+9.6)/57.6 (+4.5)/63.2 (+0.9) at 12 months. Adequate numbers allowed analysis at 18 months for all groups (66.6 (+9.5)/56.1 (+3.0)/60.8 (-1.5)) and for anti-VEGF at 36 months (68.0, +10.9) Mean number of treatments were 5.1/1.5/1.2 at 12 months, 5.9/1.7/1.2 at 18 months for all three groups and 10.3 at 36 months for anti-VEGF.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity improvements were higher and more sustained with anti-VEGF. Higher treatment burden occurred with anti-VEGF but this reduced over 36 months. Patients with better vision at baseline than those in the clinical trials maintained high levels of vision with both anti-VEGF and dexamethasone.

The internal limiting membrane: Roles in retinal development and implications for emerging ocular therapies

Basement membranes help to establish, maintain, and separate their associated tissues. They also provide growth and signaling substrates for nearby resident cells. The internal limiting membrane (ILM) is the basement membrane at the ocular vitreoretinal interface. While the ILM is essential for normal retinal development, it is dispensable in adulthood. Moreover, the ILM may constitute a significant barrier to emerging ocular therapeutics, such as viral gene therapy or stem cell transplantation. Here we take a neurodevelopmental perspective in examining how retinal neurons, glia, and vasculature interact with individual extracellular matrix constituents at the ILM. In addition, we review evidence that the ILM may impede novel ocular therapies and discuss approaches for achieving retinal parenchymal targeting of gene vectors and cell transplants delivered into the vitreous cavity by manipulating interactions with the ILM.

Real-life study of the use of anti-VEGF therapy versus dexamethasone implant for treatment of macular edema in retinal vein occlusion

Purpose

To investigate the long-time outcome of patients with branch vein occlusion (BRVO) and central vein occlusion (CRVO) treated with anti-VEGF injections compared to the dexamethasone (DEX) implant.

Methods

This retrospective real-life study included all 492 patients presenting with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) during 2012–2013 at St. Erik Eye Hospital. Maximum follow-up was 5 years.

Results

The mean time of follow-up for patients treated for macular edema was 33.2±17.7 and 34.3±18.1 months in the BRVO and CRVO groups, respectively. At the end of follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity improved +9.8±20.4 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters in BRVO patients receiving anti-VEGF therapy while patients treated with the DEX implant lost −2.1±23.4 letters (p<0.05). CRVO patients treated with anti-VEGF therapy improved +0.2±27.6 letters while patients receiving a DEX implant lost −9.7±32.6 letters (p=0.11). Overall, in RVO patients treated with anti-VEGF injections, the central retinal thickness decreased to 322±174μm compared to 398±174 μm in patients treated with the DEX implant (p<0.05).

Conclusions

In a clinical setting, a substantial part of patients is still in follow-up a long time after presentation. The visual and anatomical outcomes were better in patients treated with anti-VEGF agents compared to subjects receiving a DEX implant.

Twelve-month outcomes of ranibizumab versus aflibercept for macular oedema in branch retinal vein occlusion: data from the FRB! registry

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare the efficacy of ranibizumab (0.5 mg) with aflibercept (2 mg) in the treatment of cystoid macular oedema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) over 12 months.

METHODS

A multicentre, international, database observational study recruited 322 eyes initiating therapy in real-world practice over 5 years. The main outcome measure was mean change in EDTRS letter scores of visual acuity (VA). Secondary outcomes included anatomic outcomes, percentage of eyes with VA >6/12 (70 letters), number of injections and visits, time to first inactivity, switching or non-completion.

RESULTS

Generalised mixed effect models demonstrated that mean (95% CI) adjusted 12-month VA changes for ranibizumab and aflibercept were similar (+10.8 (8.2 to 13.4) vs +10.9 (8.3 to 13.5) letters, respectively, p=0.59). The mean adjusted change in central subfield thickness (CST) was greater for aflibercept than ranibizumab (-170 (-153 to -187) µm vs -147 (-130 to -164) µm, respectively, p=0.001). The overall median (Q1, Q3) of 7 (4, 8) injections and 9 (7, 11) visits was similar between treatment groups. First grading of inactivity occurred sooner with aflibercept (p=0.01). Switching was more common from ranibizumab (37 eyes, 23%) than from aflibercept (17 eyes, 11%; p=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Visual outcomes at 12 months in this direct comparison of ranibizumab and aflibercept for BRVO in real-world practice were generally good and similar for the 2 drugs, despite a greater effect of aflibercept on CST and time to first grading of inactivity.

Real-Life Management of Central and Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Seven-Year Follow-Up Study

Retinal vein occlusion is the second most common retinal vascular pathology after diabetic retinopathy and a major cause of vision impairment. Nowadays, both central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) can be well-managed by intravitreal treatments. However, considering the long-life expectance of the patients, few data are present in the literature about the very long-term outcome of CRVO and BRVO. The present study was an interventional, retrospective analysis of the morphological and functional long-term outcome of CRVO and BRVO patients, followed in an Italian referral center. We collected data from 313 eyes (178 CRVO eyes and 135 BRVO eyes). Mean follow-up was 45 ± 25 months (range 12-84 months). Both CRVO and BRVO eyes experience a significant visual acuity improvement secondary to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/dexamethasone treatments (from 0.57 ± 0.25 to 0.41 ± 0.24 LogMAR in CRVO and from 0.53 ± 0.42 to 0.30 ± 0.41 LogMAR in BRVO, respectively) (p < 0.01). Also, central macular thickness (CMT) resulted significant recovery at the end of the follow-up (from 585.54 ± 131.43 to 447.88 ± 245.07 μm in CRVO and from 585.54 ± 131.43 to 447.88 ± 245.07 μm in BRVO, respectively) (p < 0.01). CRVO eyes received a mean of 10.70 ± 4.76 intravitreal treatments, whereas BRVO underwent 9.80 ± 5.39 injections over the entire 7-year follow-up. Our analyses highlighted different time points indicating the best obtainable improvement. This was the first year for CRVO (12-month follow-up) and the second year for BRVO (24-month follow-up). After these two time points, both visual acuity and CMT resulted stable up to the end of the follow-up. Ischemia was associated with significantly worse outcome.

Optical coherence tomographic patterns in patients with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema treated by ranibizumab: a predictive and personalized approach

Purpose

To establish the morphological and functional parameters to predict the effectiveness of intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion and to develop a mathematical model for personalized treatment algorithms.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study of 98 patients (98 eyes) with macular edema, who received IVI of ranibizumab and were followed up for 12 months. Spectral optical coherence tomography scans and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessments were conducted every 3 months. Treatment outcome predictors were calculated based on logistic regression analysis.

Results

The most significant prognostic factors for the long-term BCVA were baseline BCVA (OR 11.1, p = 0.001), foveal volume (OR 10.8, p = 0.001), destruction of external limiting membrane (OR 15.8, p = 0.001), photoreceptor inner/outer segments (OR 11.1, p = 0.001) and retinal pigment epithelium (OR 9.1, p = 0.001). It has also been discovered that post-treatment BCVA correlated with the height of serous retinal detachment (SRD) (r = -0.4, p = 0.001), ganglion cell complex thickness (r =  + 0.3, p = 0.01) and focal loss of ganglion cells (r =-0.3, p = 0.005). Patients without SRD required fewer ranibizumab injections (3.8 ± 1.1) for macular edema fluid resorption compared to those with SRD (5.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.03). A mathematical model for predicting and personalized approach therapy of ranibizumab has been obtained (accuracy of 89%).

Conclusion

The effectiveness of IVI of ranibizumab depends on baseline morphological and functional changes. The obtained mathematical model allows for predicting the outcomes of therapy, determining individualized algorithms to increase the treatment effectiveness and to prevent low vision that corresponds to the principles of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Patterns and Predictors of Successful Treatment Discontinuation in Retinal Vein Occlusions With Macular Edema in the Real World

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with successful treatment discontinuation in eyes with retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) and macular edema (ME) in real-world settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of 214 eyes with RVO and ME with 24-month follow-up at five academic centers. Regression analyses identified factors associated with (1) successful treatment discontinuation for at least 6 months without fluid recurrence and (2) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 24 months.

RESULTS

Forty percent of eyes with branch RVO and 35% with central RVO (CRVO) / hemi-retinal RVO (HRVO) successfully discontinued therapy without fluid recurrence, with median time to discontinuation of 6 and 7 months, respectively. Lower 6-month central subfield thickness was associated with greater likelihood of treatment discontinuation within 24 months for eyes with CRVO/HRVO (P = .001), whereas better 6-month BCVA was associated with better 24-month BCVA for all RVO subtypes (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Early anatomic response at 6 months is associated with greater likelihood of stopping treatments. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:84-92.].

Predictive Factors for Long-Term Postoperative Visual Outcome in Patients with Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Treated with Vitrectomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate potential predictive factors of long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

METHODS

Participants in this study were 86 patients diagnosed with macula-off RRD, who underwent PPV. Demographic characteristics and preoperative characteristics of RRD were recorded, while best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured preoperatively and at specific postoperative time points (6 weeks and 6, 12, and 24 months). In addition, spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) characteristics at postoperative week 6 were assessed as potential factors affecting the long-term postoperative visual outcome 24 months after PPV for RRD.

RESULTS

Increasing age, duration of RD of more than 1 week, presence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy, increasing central retinal thickness, ellipsoid zone disruption, and external limiting membrane disruption were significantly associated with a worse BVCA. BCVA was not associated with gender, lens status, the location of breaks, the gas tamponade agent used in PPV, the presence of subretinal fluid, and intraretinal fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to determine predictive factors for visual outcomes in order to inform patients about their prognosis and help in the decision-making process for patient management.

Spectral Domain OCT Predictors of Visual Acuity in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2: SCORE 2 Report 15

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between baseline demographic and spectral domain OCT (SD-OCT) features with visual acuity (VA) in the Study of COmparative Treatments for REtinal Vein Occlusion 2 (SCORE2) over 2 years.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of prospective clinical trial data.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 362 SCORE2 participants with macular edema secondary to central retinal (CRVO) or hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO).

METHODS

Spectral domain OCT volume scans were assessed at the SCORE2 reading center at baseline, month 01 (M01), month 06 (M06), month 12 (M12), and month 24 (M24) for central subfield thickness (CST), subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, vitreoretinal interface abnormalities, disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL), and ellipsoid zone (EZ) within the central subfield (CSF).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Visual acuity at M06, M12, and M24.

RESULTS

Mean baseline age was 68.9 years. Mean VA at M01 was 63.2 letters, and CST was 299.7 μm. At M01, subretinal fluid was seen in 28.5% intraretinal fluid in 67.2%, DRIL was seen in 73.8%, mostly within the CSF, and the EZ was absent in 9.8 and patchy in 31.7%. In multivariate analysis including all M01 demographics and SD-OCT parameters and their association with VA at M06, M12, and M24, VA at M01 remained significant across all time points up to M24 (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this 2-year follow-up of eyes that were treated with both per protocol and off protocol for RVO, VA at M01 was an important predictor of long-term vision and change in vision. Establishing predictors of visual recovery helps identify causes for poor responders to treatment in patients with RVO.

Fluctuations in Macular Thickness in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated with Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agents

PURPOSE

To evaluate macular thickness fluctuations in patients with retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and to assess whether patients with larger fluctuations have poorer visual outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Treatment-naive patients with RVO.

METHODS

Central subfield thickness (CST), cube volume (CV), and cube average thickness (CAT) were collected from OCT images obtained at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and standard deviations (SDs) across 12 months were calculated. Mixed-effects regression was performed to examine the relationship between macular thickness SD and 12-month visual acuity (VA). Standard multiple regression was performed to identify predictors of macular thickness SD.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Standard deviations across 12 months for CST, CV, and CAT and VA at 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-four eyes, including 71 with branch RVO (BRVO) and 63 with central RVO (CRVO), were evaluated. Mean baseline and 12-month CST were 488.6 ± 165.0 μm and 334.3 ± 131.9 μm (change, -154.3 ± 210.2 μm; P < 0.001), with CST SD of 114.1 ± 77.0 μm. Baseline and 12-month VA were 52.8 ± 20.9 letters and 65.9 ± 17.3 letters (change, +13.1 ± 20.3 letters; P < 0.001). Central subfield thickness SD was a significant negative predictor of 12-month VA (-5.21 letters/100 μm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.21 to -0.22 letters/100 μm; P = 0.041) when adjusting for baseline factors and injections. Baseline CST and number of injections were not predictive (P ≥ 0.101). Stratification by CST SD demonstrated a 10-letter difference in 12-month VA between the first and fourth quartiles. Baseline CST and RVO diagnosis were the only significant predictors of CST SD (CRVO vs. BRVO: +34.64 μm/100 μm [95% CI, 29.33-39.94 μm/100 μm; P < 0.001] and +22.13 μm/100 μm [95% CI, 4.81-39.44 μm/100 μm; P = 0.013]). Associations using CV and CAT were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger macular thickness fluctuations are associated with poorer visual outcomes in patients with RVO treated with anti-VEGF agents. Macular thickness fluctuations, in addition to absolute macular thickness, may be an important prognostic biomarker in these patients.

Twenty-four-month results of intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate 24-month results of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) for macular edema due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO-ME).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Subjects were treatment-naïve BRVO-ME patients at the Ophthalmology Department of Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital from November 2015 to March 2017 who received IVA treatment for 24 months. After the first injection, reinjection was performed as needed when ME had recurred or was prolonged beyond 300 μm. Data included changes in best corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness, total number of injections, and the case background factors that required reinjection after 12 months. ME remission was defined as patients without additional injections for 6 months.

RESULTS

Forty eyes of 40 patients (64.5 ± 11.5 years), 21 men and 19 women, were included. Average best corrected visual acuity and central foveal thickness at baseline were logMAR 0.42 ± 0.21, 601.4 ± 181.3 μm, logMAR 0.08 ± 0.25, 214.6 ± 62.7 μm at 12 months, logMAR 0.02 ± 0.16, 216.6 ± 97.8 μm at 24 months, all significantly improved from baseline. The average number of injections was 2.2 ± 1.0 times in the first year and 0.4 ± 0.8 times in the second year. The rate of ME remission was 60.0% at 12 months and 87.5% at 24 months. Period between onset and injections was significantly associated with reinjection after 12 months (p =.030).

CONCLUSIONS

IVA was effective over 24 months for ME due to BRVO in many cases. Early injection treatment may reduce the need for later injections.

Characterization of microvascular tortuosity in retinal vein occlusion utilizing optical coherence tomography angiography

We investigated the characteristics of microvessel tortuosity in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and their associations with visual outcomes using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Thirty-four BRVO and 21 CRVO patients and 31 healthy subjects were included. From OCTA, the branch number (BN), mean branch length (BL), mean Euclidean length (EL), vessel density (VD) and vessel tortuosity (VT) were quantified. In BRVO eyes, compared with that in the controls, the affected area of the deep capillary plexus (DCP) showed a decreased BN and VD, an increased BL, and unchanged VT. The nonaffected area of the DCP showed decreases in BN, VD and VT. The affected area of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) showed higher VT. In CRVO eyes, the DCP showed a lower BN, VD and VT, while the SCP showed a lower BN and greater BL and EL. Improved visual acuity (VA) after 1 year in BRVO eyes was associated with decreases in BN, BL, VD and VT in the affected area in the DCP and lower VT in the nonaffected area of the SCP; in CRVO eyes, improved VA was associated with a higher BL and EL in the DCP. VT, BL, and EL may be new microvascular markers associated with changes in VA in BRVO and CRVO.

Macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion in a real-life setting: a multicenter, nationwide, 3-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the presence of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO)-both central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO)-3 years after diagnosis in patients who underwent intravitreal therapy and to identify potential prognostic factors and biomarkers of persistent macular edema.

METHODS

National multicenter, observational, exploratory, retrospective cohort study of 104 consecutive patients with macular edema secondary to RVO diagnosed from January 2014 to December 2015 with minimum 3-year follow-up time. Data analyzed included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), clinical and demographic data, and spectral domain optical coherence tomography parameters.

RESULTS

At final observation, median baseline central retinal thickness significantly improved from baseline 538 to 290 μm (p < 0.001) and complete macular edema resolution was achieved in 51.0% of patients (56.3% and 42.5% in BRVO and CRVO patients, respectively). BCVA also improved (p < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis revealed a relationship between recurrence of macular edema and disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) at baseline (odds ratio = 2.88; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Good long-term anatomical and functional outcomes are achieved with intravitreal treatments in RVO patients. Anatomical success and visual gains seen in the first year were maintained throughout the entire follow-up, though DRIL is a major risk factor for recurrence.

Ocular microcirculation changes, measured with laser speckle flowgraphy and optical coherence tomography angiography, in branch retinal vein occlusion with macular edema treated by ranibizumab

PURPOSE

This study searched for early predictive vascular biomarkers for visual outcomes in eyes with macular edema caused by branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVOME).

METHODS

Twenty-four eyes of 24 subjects with BRVOME were treated with the intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) for at least 6 months. We measured mean blur rate (MBR) in the optic nerve head (ONH) and vessel density (VD) in the macula with laser speckle flowgraphy and optical coherence tomography angiography, respectively.

RESULTS

Six-month post-IVR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was correlated positively with age, pre-IVR BCVA, 1-month post-IVR BCVA, 3-month post-IVR BCVA and pre-IVR systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively) and negatively with pre-IVR overall MBR, 1-month post-IVR overall MBR, 6-month post-IVR overall MBR, 3-month post-IVR deep retinal capillary plexus (DCP) VD and 6-month post-IVR DCP VD (P = 0.03, P = 0.03, P = 0.02, P = 0.01 and P = 0.005, respectively). Furthermore, a multiple regression analysis showed that pre-IVR overall MBR (β =  - 0.67, P = 0.009) was among independent prognostic factors predicting 6-month post-IVR BCVA. Six-month post-IVR DCP VD was also correlated with overall MBR at all time points.

CONCLUSION

ONH blood flow may be a pre-IVR biomarker of both visual outcomes and post-IVR deep macular microcirculation in eyes with BRVOME.

Real-World Visual and Neovascularisation Outcomes from anti-VEGF in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) can be complicated by macular oedema, requiring intravitreal injection (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). CRVO can cause neovascularisation, potentially causing persistent pain if not identified early. Whilst clinical trial data describe visual and anti-neovascular benefit from anti-VEGF there are limited real-world data.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of a consecutive series of patients found from a review of the electronic medical record at a single UK centre. Visual acuity, macula status, number of IVIs and neovascular status were extracted at standardised timepoints.

RESULTS

In total, 231 eyes from 231 patients were identified with 6-48 months of follow up. Twenty-four months after treatment initiation, 81 eyes (53.3%) had no remaining macula oedema and mean visual acuity gained was 8.9 (SD 19.0) Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters following a mean of 10.1 (3.9) IVIs. Of 222 eyes that had no initial neovascularisation, 11 went on to develop it, with iris involvement in 10 eyes. Median time from treatment initiation to neovascularisation was 17.2 (range 5.0-44.1) months, and the median time from latest IVI to neovascularisation was 9.6 (2.9-27.6) months after a median of 4 (3-10) IVIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Visual acuity in CRVO complicated by macular oedema improves following anti-VEGF treatment but real-world gains are more modest than those from clinical trials. Neovascularisation following CRVO can be substantially delayed by anti-VEGF treatment and so if individuals who have received IVIs are to be effectively screened for neovascularisation long-term surveillance is necessary.

Efficacy of intravitreal Lucentis injection on major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion

Background

The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy of intravitreal Lucentis injection on major and macular branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, 43 patients (major BRVO n = 24; macular BRVO, n = 19) were treated with intravitreal injection of Lucentis with a 1 + PRN regimen, which is diagnosed by fluorescein fundus angiography (FFA). “1 + PRN”, namely, one intravitreal injection of Lucentis at the baseline, and then continue or stop according to the condition of the patient. The following observation indexes were measured at baseline and follow-up (1–6 months): best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), foveal thickness (CFT), total retinal volume with macular diameter of 6 mm. During the follow-up, repeated injections were given according to patients’ demand, and the number of injections was recorded.

Result

The observation indexes of patients with BRVO were significantly improved after 6 months of Lucentis treatment in both major and macular groups, including BCVA, CFT and the retinal volume of the 6 mm-diameter macula. Interestingly, there were significant differences in the therapeutic effect between the two groups, and the macular group had better therapeutic effect than the major group with the less number of repeated injections.

Conclusions

To sum up, intravitreal injection of Lucentis was effective for both major and macular BRVO, and the efficacy in macular subtype group was better than that in major subtype group with the more obviously improvement and the less number of injections.

A systematic review of real-world evidence of the management of macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

This review assessed the real-world evidence of the management of macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). A meta-analysis of 2530 eyes from 48 real-world studies of therapies for macular oedema secondary to BRVO was conducted. Baseline characteristics, visual, anatomical and safety outcomes were recorded. The weighted mean and weighted estimates from random-effects models were calculated for visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) changes at 6, 12 and 24 months. Primary outcome was change in VA (logMAR letters) at 12 months. Study quality was assessed using the quality appraisal checklist for case series developed by Institute of Health Economics. The mean baseline VA for the pooled data was 54.0 (51.5, 56.5) letters and the mean baseline CST was 501.3 (483.5, 519.1) µm. The random-effects estimate for mean (95% CI) change in VA was 14.6 (12.5, 16.7) letters at 12 months (n = 1727). The random-effects estimate for mean (95% CI) change in CST was -181.7 (-230.7, -132.7) µm at 12 months (n = 1325). The quality of studies varied considerably. Ocular and systemic adverse events were discussed in 79% and 42% of treatment arms respectively, with possible under-reporting. Visual and anatomical gains achieved in the real-world for anti-VEGF therapy were not as impressive as seminal RCTs, possibly due to reduced injection frequency in the real world and differences in baseline characteristics. There is an urgent need for consensus on the minimum efficacy, treatment burden and safety data to collect to strengthen the real-world evidence base.