SUSPENDING TREATMENT OF NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION IN CASES OF FUTILITY

Outcomes of Intentionally Suspending Treatment in Eyes With Advanced Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

PURPOSE

To determine the outcomes of intentionally suspending anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections in eyes with advanced neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

The study sample comprised 93 patients with nAMD and best available Snellen visual acuity (VA) ≤20/400 in which anti-VEGF treatment was suspended by the treating physician. VA and optical coherence tomography (OCT) characteristics were evaluated to determine visual and anatomical outcomes up to 24 months after treatment suspension.

RESULTS

A total of 93 eyes from 93 patients who had received a mean of 16 anti-VEGF injections over a mean of 962 (SD 562) days were included. Comparing the treatment suspension visit to 24 months later, no significant change in mean central foveal thickness (163 [SD 118, range 19-704] μm vs 164 [SD 217, range 19-1468], P = .97), greatest lesion diameter (2547 [SD 1294, range 134-5707] μm vs 2442 [SD 1158, range 421-5305] μm, P = .43), greatest lesion thickness (194 [SD 136, range 0-618] μm vs 205 [SD 131, range 0-573] μm, P = .40), or VA (1.87 [SD 0.37], 20/1482, vs 1.94 [SD 0.28], 20/1741, P = .16) was found. In total, 7 eyes (7.5%) restarted treatment following a mean of 977 (SD 450) days after treatment suspension.

CONCLUSIONS

Suspension of anti-VEGF injections in eyes with advanced nAMD and VA ≤20/400 may be reasonable in cases where the treating physician deems additional treatment is unlikely to provide benefit. Although the visual and anatomical findings remained stable after treatment suspension in most, a small number restarted anti-VEGF therapy, suggesting that eyes should still be monitored for disease progression.

Discontinuation of treatment and retreatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration in the real-world: Bundang AMD cohort study report 5

Introduction

This single-center retrospective cohort study investigated the incidence rate and risk factors for the discontinuation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections and retreatment in typical neovascular age-related macular degeneration (tnAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) in the real-world setting.

Methods

A total of 488 eyes with either tnAMD (n = 334) or PCV (n = 154) followed up for ≥3 years were analyzed. The discontinuation of treatment was defined as the cessation of anti-VEGF injections for 1 year or longer. Eyes with discontinuing treatment were subdivided into group A: eyes with stable responses (complete or incomplete resolution) and group B: those with no expectation of visual gain or poor response. The proportion and median time of discontinuation of treatment or retreatment were analyzed. The visual prognosis and the associated risk factors for the discontinuation of treatment or retreatment were also investigated.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 8.1 ± 3.4 years. Of 488 eyes, discontinuation of the treatment occurred in 322 eyes (66.0%), and the median time to discontinuation was 1.5 years after the initial injection. Of 297 eyes with discontinuation of treatment excluding 25 eyes with vitrectomy or photodynamic therapy after the discontinuation of the injection, 277 eyes belonged to group A and the remaining 20 eyes belonged to group B. Of the 277 eyes discontinuing treatment with a stable response, 185 eyes (66.8%) were given retreatment. The median time to retreatment was 3.3 years after the discontinuation of the injections. PCV and the lower annual number of injections were the significant factors associated with discontinuation. Younger age, male gender, and PCV were the significant factors for the retreatment.

Conclusion

Our long-term real-world study showed that two-thirds of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) had the discontinuation of the anti-VEGF injections and two-thirds of eyes discontinuing treatment with stable responses experienced retreatment. Long-term follow-up and regular monitoring are needed to detect the recurrence.

Patterns of treatment discontinuation in patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration

Purpose:

To report the reasons for treatment discontinuation within 5 years in patients receiving intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Methods:

A retrospective case-notes review of patients commenced on anti-VEGF for nAMD who failed to complete 5 years of follow-up was undertaken. The reasons for treatment discontinuation, baseline age, baseline visual acuity (VA) in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters, and the VA change at the last follow-up were recorded. Age-specific all-cause mortality was calculated for deceased patients.

Results:

Of the 1177 patients, 551 patients (46.8%) failed to complete the 5-year follow-up. The reasons for treatment discontinuation were death (251), early discharge due to stable disease (110), further treatment deemed futile (100), failure to attend (15), ill health (14), patient choice (7), and transfer of care (1). In 53 patients, no reason was documented. The mean baseline age of those who completed the 5-year follow-up (77.4 ± 7.8 years, 95% confidence interval (CI): 76.8–77.9) was significantly lower than those who discontinued the treatment for any reason (82 ± 7.7 years, 95% CI: 81.4–82.6) (P < 0.0001). Survival analysis showed that baseline VA was not a factor in treatment discontinuation; however, visual stability (±5 letters from baseline) was associated with treatment continuation. The age-specific all-cause mortality in deceased patients was lower than that in the general population.

Conclusion:

At 5 years, only 53% of patients remained in active care, and death was the most common reason for treatment discontinuation. Lower baseline age and VA stability during therapy were associated with treatment continuation.

[Current view on the issue of insufficient effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy for age-related macular degeneration]

Due to the significant medical and social importance of neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (wAMD), increasing the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy used to treat this disease is one of the high-priority problems in modern retinology. This article focuses on pathobiological aspects and clinical manifestations of incomplete responses to anti-VEGF therapy of wAMD, considers the proposed ways to improve the terminology and classification of responses to therapy, as well as the assessment of its correctness and effectiveness of the treatment. It also discusses the available ways to optimize anti-VEGF therapy and define the criteria of its termination in cases when the treatment proves to be futile.

Hypothetical Switch of Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An ARIES Post Hoc Analysis

Introduction

Switching to an alternative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agent has been suggested for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who have a suboptimal response to initial therapy. However, post hoc analyses of some studies have shown that continuation of initial anti-VEGF therapy is, in many cases, associated with stable visual outcomes or gradual gains.

Methods

This ARIES (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891) post hoc analysis describes outcomes in patients with treatment-naïve nAMD receiving treat-and-extend intravitreal aflibercept (IVT-AFL) for 104 weeks, who were identified as meeting criteria for an early hypothetical switch. Patients were categorized retrospectively according to six criteria (presence of central intraretinal and/or subretinal fluid at week 8 or 24, with/without a next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks, and with/without gains in best-corrected visual acuity [BCVA] ≤ 5 letters [with absolute BCVA < 70 letters]).

Results

Hypothetical switch criteria were largely met due to the presence of central subretinal fluid rather than intraretinal fluid. Depending on the criterion, 8–46% of patients were considered to be hypothetical switchers. BCVA outcomes were not worse in the hypothetical switchers, irrespective of criteria. Using criteria of intraretinal/subretinal fluid at week 24 and a next planned treatment interval ≤ 8 weeks, mean changes in BCVA (letters) from baseline in hypothetical switchers and non-switchers were: + 6.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4, 8.8) and + 6.6 (95% CI 4.7, 8.6), respectively, at week 24; + 8.2 (95% CI 5.0, 11.3) and + 7.5 (95% CI 5.3, 9.7), respectively, at week 52; and + 5.7 (95% CI 1.3, 10.1) and + 3.4 (95% CI 0.1, 6.7), respectively, at week 104.

Conclusions

In newly diagnosed nAMD, there appears little rationale for early switching from IVT-AFL since, with continuous proactive treatment, comparable visual gains can be achieved by patients meeting hypothetical switch criteria compared with those who initially respond well on a treat-and-extend regimen. However, further prospective studies are needed.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02581891.

Video Summary

Treat-and-Extend Regimens for the Management of Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy: Consensus and Recommendations From the Asia-Pacific Vitreo-retina Society

PURPOSE

Review and provide consensus recommendations on use of treat-and-extend (T&E) regimens for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) management with relevance for clinicians in the Asia-Pacific region.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, and abstract databases of the Asia-Pacific Vitreo-retina Society, European Society of Retina Specialists, American Academy of Ophthalmology, and Controversies in Ophthalmology: Asia-Australia congresses, was conducted to assess evidence for T&E regimens in nAMD. Only studies with ≥100 study eyes were included. An expert panel reviewed the results and key factors potentially influencing the use of T&E regimens in nAMD and PCV, and subsequently formed consensus recommendations for their application in the Asia-Pacific region.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were included. Studies demonstrated that T&E regimens with aflibercept, ranibizumab, or bevacizumab in nAMD, and with aflibercept in PCV, were efficacious and safe. The recommendation for T&E is, after ≥3 consecutive monthly loading doses, treatment intervals can be extended by 2 to 4 weeks up to 12 to 16 weeks. When disease activity recurs, the recommendation is to reinject and shorten intervals by 2 to 4 weeks until fluid resolution, after which treatment intervals can again be extended. Intraretinal fluid should be treated until resolved; however, persistent minimal subretinal fluid after consecutive treatments may be tolerated with treatment intervals maintained or extended if the clinical condition is stable.

CONCLUSIONS

T&E regimens are efficacious and safe for nAMD and PCV, can reduce the number of visits, and minimize the overall burden for clinicians and patients.

MANAGEMENT OF RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIUM TEAR DURING ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY

PURPOSE

This article aims to review current evidence on the development, diagnosis, and management of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear during anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed using MEDLINE/PubMed databases (cut-off date: August 2019).

RESULTS

Three key recommendations were made based on existing literature and clinical experience: 1) Multimodal imaging with color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, near-infrared reflectance imaging, fundus autofluorescence imaging, optical coherence tomography-angiography, and/or fluorescein angiography are recommended to diagnose RPE tear and assess risk factors. Retinal pigment epithelium tears can be graded by size and foveal involvement. 2) Patients at high risk of developing RPE tear should be monitored after each anti-VEGF injection. If risk factors worsen, it is not yet definitively known whether anti-VEGF administration should be more frequent, or alternatively stopped in such patients. Prospective research into high-risk characteristics is needed. 3) After RPE tear develops, anti-VEGF treatment should be continued in patients with active disease (as indicated by presence of intraretinal or subretinal fluid), although cessation of therapy should be considered in eyes with multilobular tears.

CONCLUSION

Although evidence to support the assumption that anti-VEGF treatment contributes to development of RPE tear is not definitive, some data suggest this link.