REPEATED INTRAVITREAL INJECTION OF BEVACIZUMAB FOR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

Efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab on diabetic macular oedema in an African population

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (avastin) injection on visual outcomes of patients with diabetic macular oedema.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate 39 eyes of thirty-nine patients (mean age ± SD: 61.4 ± 15.0 years) that received intravitreal bevacizumab injection (1.25 mg in 0.05 ml) as treatment for diabetic macular oedema between January 2014 and July 2019 in Ghana. Data on visual acuity and central macular thickness before treatment and 6 weeks post-treatment were collected and analysed using paired t-test. Ordinary least squares linear regression analysis was also conducted to determine the relationship between improvement in visual acuity and central macular thickness after treatment and other predictor variables.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD visual acuity (LogMAR-equivalent of Snellen) of patients with diabetic macular oedema significantly improved from 0.84 ± 0.58 LogMAR before treatment to 0.69 ± 0.58 LogMAR at 6 weeks post-treatment (mean difference: 0.15 ± 0.32 LogMAR; 95% CI: 0.04 to 0.25; p = 0.01). Mean macular thickness ± SD on the other hand, reduced significantly (p < 0.001) from 316.54 ± 75.35 μm before treatment to 275.54 ± 57.43 μm after treatment. While age and worse pre-treatment visual acuity predicted improvement in visual acuity after treatment, a higher central macular thickness before treatment predicted an improvement in central macular thickness after intravitreal bevacizumab injection.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab injection produces short-term improvement in vision and reduction in central macular thickness in African patients with diabetic macular oedema.

Intravitreal PRN ranibizumab treatment for macular edemadue to branch retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND/AIM

To evaluate the effect of intravitreal pro re nata (PRN) ranibizumab treatment from the start on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central retinal thickness (CRT) in macular edema (ME) due to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with ME secondary to BRVO, who were treated on a PRN basis after a single intravitreal ranibizumab injection, were retrospectively evaluated. The main outcome measures were changes in BCVA and CRT as measured by optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

The number of injections over 6 months was 2.43 ± 1.16. The mean BCVA of the patients was 0.84 ± 0.10 logMAR at baseline and 0.41 ± 0.06 at the 6th month (P < 0.001). Mean BCVA of the ischemic BRVO group was 1.06 ± 0.68 logMAR at baseline and 0.44 ± 0.30 logMAR at the 6th month (P < 0.05). Similarly, the mean BCVA of the nonischemic BRVO group was 0.77 ± 0.53 logMAR at baseline and 0.41 ± 0.36 logMAR at the 6th month (P < 0.05). Between groups, there was no significant difference in mean BCVA at any examination.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal ranibizumab is a safe and effective treatment option for ME due to ischemic and nonischemic BRVO using PRN from the start.

Comparison of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide versus intravitreal bevacizumab as the primary treatment of clinically significant macular edema

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the short-term efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide versus bevacizumab for the treatment of diabetic, clinically significant, macular edema with different optical coherence tomography findings.

METHODS

Fifty eyes of 45 consecutive patients with diabetic, clinically significant, macular edema were incorporated in this prospective interventional case series. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to findings on optical coherence tomography: 1) macular edema combined with serous retinal detachment (Group 1), 2) diffused macular thickening (Group 2), and 3) cystoid macular edema (Group 3). Patients from each group were treated with a single intravitreal injection of triamcinolone (IVTA) or 2 intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (IVB) with an interval of 6 weeks. Patients were observed at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after IVTA or the first IVB injection. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were examined at each visit. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the efficacy of the treatment groups.

RESULTS

In Group 1, IVTA showed more favorable effects on CRT reduction and BCVA improvement compared with IVB at 6, 12, and 24 weeks (P = 0.002, 0.001, 0.027 and P = 0.036, 0.001, 0.027), respectively. In Group 2, IVB had more CRT reduction than IVTA at 6 and 12 weeks (P = 0.013 and 0.036), although there was no significant difference in BCVA improvement between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). In Group 3, IVTA and IVB did not have significant effects on CRT reduction and BCVA improvement (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The short-term efficacy of IVTA and IVB on treating clinically significant macular edema varied with different optical coherence tomography findings. In clinically significant macular edema combined with serous retinal detachment, IVTA may be more favorable than IVB in CRT reduction and BCVA improvement. In patients with diffused macular thickening, IVB may be better than IVTA in macular thickness reduction, although this does not translate to a significant improvement in BCVA.

Current nanotechnology approaches for the treatment and management of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a consequence of diabetes mellitus at the ocular level, leading to vision loss, and contributing to the decrease of patient's life quality. The biochemical and anatomic abnormalities that occur in DR are discussed in this review to better understand and manage the development of new therapeutic strategies. The use of new drug delivery systems based on nanoparticles (e.g. liposomes, dendrimers, cationic nanoemulsions, lipid and polymeric nanoparticles) is discussed along with the current traditional treatments, pointing out the advantages of the proposed nanomedicines to target this ocular disease. Despite the multifactorial nature of DR, which is not entirely understood, some strategies based on nanoparticles are being exploited for a more efficient drug delivery to the posterior segment of the eye. On the other hand, the use of some nanoparticles also seems to contribute to the development of DR symptoms (e.g. retinal neovascularization), which are also discussed in light of an efficient management of this ocular chronic disease.

Evolving strategies in the management of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR), the most common long-term complication of diabetes mellitus, remains one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Tight glycemic and blood pressure control has been shown to significantly decrease the risk of development as well as the progression of retinopathy and represents the cornerstone of medical management of DR. The two most threatening complications of DR are diabetic macular edema (DME) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Focal/grid photocoagulation and panretinal photocoagulation are standard treatments for both DME and PDR, respectively. Focal/grid photocoagulation is a better treatment than intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with DME. Currently, most experts consider combination focal/grid laser therapy and pharmacotherapy with intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents in patients with center-involving DME. Combination therapy reduces the frequency of injections needed to control edema. Vitrectomy with removal of the posterior hyaloid seems to be effective in eyes with persistent diffuse DME, particularly in eyes with associated vitreomacular traction. Emerging therapies include fenofibrate, ruboxistaurin, renin-angiotensin system blockers, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists, pharmacologic vitreolysis, and islet cell transplantation.

Repeated intravitreal bevacizumab injection with and without macular grid photocoagulation for treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema

PURPOSE

To study whether the use of macular grid photocoagulation 3 weeks subsequent to the initial intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema can provide a longer disease-free intervals and reduce the burden of more frequent injections.

METHODS

A prospective pilot study that included 22 patients with bilateral diffuse diabetic macular edema. In each patient, one eye was treated with repeated IVB injections alone (IVB group), while the other eye was treated with repeated IVB injections in addition to macular grid photocoagulation once only 3 weeks after the initial IVB injection (combined group). Before each IVB injection and during the follow-up visits, all patients received a complete ophthalmic examination. The central macular thickness was measured by optical coherence tomography at baseline and during the follow-up examinations. Fundus fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and before each IVB injection, to detect and assess macular leakage. All patients were followed-up monthly for at least 12 months after the initial IVB injection and for 3 months after the last IVB injection.

RESULTS

By the end of the follow-up duration (14.2 ± 1.91 months), the mean number of injections was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the combined group (2.36 per eye) than in the IVB group (3.27 per eye). The mean duration between the injections was significantly longer in the combined group than in the IVB group (P < 0.05). Within each group, the difference between the mean central macular thickness at the baseline and at the end of the follow-up duration was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The change in the mean best-corrected visual acuity between the baseline and the end of the follow-up period was not statistically significant in both the groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups of the study as regards the number of patients who gained, maintained, or lost vision (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Repeated IVB injection could provide a long-term benefit for the treatment of diffuse diabetic macular edema. Performing macular grid photocoagulation once only 3 weeks subsequent to the initial IVB injection might provide a longer disease-free intervals and reduces the burden of more frequent injections.

Initial dose of three monthly intravitreal injections versus PRN intravitreal injections of bevacizumab for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

Purpose. To compare visual and anatomic outcomes of intravitreal bevacizumab injections administered as needed (PRN group) and initial treatment with 3 monthly injections followed by as-needed injections (3 monthly initial dose group) in patients with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Methods. This retrospective study included 69 and 26 patients in the PRN and 3 monthly initial dose groups, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were compared between the 2 groups 6 months after initial injection. Results. At month 6, BCVA change from baseline was −0.27 ± 0.28 (mean ± standard deviation) logMAR in the PRN group and −0.28 ± 0.20 logMAR in the 3 monthly initial dose group. Mean CRT changes were −204 ± 168 in the PRN group and −161 ± 149 μm in the 3 monthly initial dose group at month 6. There were no statistically significant differences in BCVA or CRT changes between groups at any time point. The number of intravitreal injections over 6 months was significantly lower in the PRN group (1.8 ± 0.8 injections) than in the 3 monthly initial dose group (3.4 ± 0.5 injections; P < 0.001). Conclusions. Our results suggest that as-needed intravitreal bevacizumab injections are more tolerable for patients with ME secondary to BRVO.

Intravitreal bevacizumab treatment for refractory diabetic macular edema

To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) on visual function and retinal thickness in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). Eyes with DME treated with IVB which were resistant to different previous treatments were enrolled in this retrospective, non-randomized series study. Each patient underwent a complete ophthalmic examination including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), slit-lamp examination, intraocular pressure measurement, fundus examination, retinal thickness measurement with optic coherence tomography at baseline and at each visit. Digital fundus fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline for each patient. A total of 71 eyes of 59 patients (36 male and 23 female) were included in the study. All eyes had focal laser photocoagulation (71 eyes, 100 %) and had one other additional treatment including an intravitreal (23 eyes, 32 %) or subtenon (18 eyes, 25 %) injection of triamcinolone acetonide. The mean follow-up period was 9.79 ± 8.6 months and the mean number of IVB treatments was 2.01 ± 1.06 (min-max, 1-4). Mean logMAR BCVA was 0.88 ± 0.4 at baseline, 0.78 ± 0.4 at 4 weeks and 0.79 ± 0.4 at the last visit (p = 0.036). The mean central foveal thickness was 515.4 ± 150.3 μm at baseline which significantly decreased to 367.01 ± 166.6 μm at 4 weeks (p = 0.0001) and 338.1 ± 159.7 μm at the last visit (p = 0.0001). Sixteen percent of the eyes did not respond to IVB treatment. IVB treatment for refractory DME seems to be effective and safe and repeated treatments are necessary for a significant portion of the cases.

Optical coherence tomographic patterns in diabetic macula edema can predict the effects of intravitreal bevacizumab injection as primary treatment

PURPOSE

To identify optical coherence tomography (OCT) patterns in diabetic macular edema (DME) that were predictive of visual outcomes after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. We examined 31 eyes (24 patients) with clinically significant macular edema that received IVB injections along with macular OCT data. The eyes were categorized into 4 groups by using OCT features: diffuse retinal thickening (DRT), cystoid macular edema (CME), serous retinal detachment (SRD), and vitreomacular interface abnormalities (VMIAs). Changes in retinal thickness, retinal volume, and visual acuity (VA) after IVB injection were compared on the basis of OCT patterns.

RESULTS

After IVB injections, changes in VA logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution were -0.06±0.36, -0.26±0.26, 0.09±0.13, and -0.08±0.15, respectively, for DRT, CME, SRD, and VMIA patterns. Central macular thickness decreased by 70.5±105.5, 110.67±97.28, 181±125.87, and 24.25±77.12 μm for the DRT, CME, SRD, and VMIA patterns, respectively. The CME group was associated with a greater reduction in retinal thickness (P=0.009) and volume (P=0.027) with superior VA improvement (P=0.012) as compared with the DRT, SRD, and VMIA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CME gained greater improvement in visual acuity and macular thickness and volume after IVB injection had been administered as the primary treatment for DME, as compared with other patients. The OCT patterns of DME may indicate the appropriate treatment; we consider these patterns to be prognostic of the response to IVB injection for macular edema.

Comparison of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema

AIM

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of bevacizumab and ranibizumab on visual function and macular thickness in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

The data of diabetic patients who had been treated with bevacizumab for DME were reviewed. Those patients who received 1 injection of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab with at least 6-month interval were considered for enrollment. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assesment with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart and central subfield macular thickness (CSMT) measurement using optical coherence tomography-3 before and after the injections were recorded as outcome measures.

RESULTS

The study included 29 eyes of 29 patients with a mean age of 56.18±13.07 years. The median BCVA was 59 ETDRS letters and the median CSMT was 411 μm preceeding the bevacizumab injection. At the 4th-6th week control after the injection, median BCVA increased to 61.50 ETDRS letters and the median CSMT decreased to 373 μm. This change in BCVA and CSMT was found to be statistically significant (P=0.029 and P=0.011, respectively). The mean interval between bevacizumab and ranibizumab treatment was 9.54±2.64 months. Ranibizumab treatment increased the median BCVA from 53 to 66 ETDRS letters and decreased the median CSMT from 428 μm to a level of 279 μm, which were statistically significant (P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). The median change in BCVA was 4.5 ETDRS letters in the bevacizumab group and 6 ETDRS letters in the ranibizumab group (P=0.58), whereas the median changes in CSMT were 41 and 100 μm after bevacizumab and ranibizumab injections, respectively (P=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Bevacizumab and ranibizumab are both effective antivascular endothelial growth factor drugs preferred in the treatment of DME. Our comparison of both therapies on the same patients suggested that the effect on BCVA was not statistically different, but ranibizumab provided more decrease in CSMT.

Diabetic retinopathy - An update

Management of diabetes should involve both systemic and ocular aspects. Control of hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia are of major role in the management of diabetic retinopathy. In the ocular part; laser treatment remains the cornerstone of treatment of diabetic macular edema (focal/grid), severe non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (panretinal photocoagulation). There is a strong support to combination therapy. Using one or two intravitreal injections such as anti-VEGF and or steroid to reduce central macular thickness followed by focal or grid laser to give a sustained response may offer an alternative to treatment in diabetic macular edema. Anti-VEGF were found to be effective as an adjunct therapy in proliferative diabetic retinopathy patient who is going to have vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage with neovascularization, panretinal photocoagulation, and other ocular surgery such as cases with neovascular glaucoma and cataract with refractory macular edema.

Advances in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy, the most common long-term complication of diabetes mellitus, remains one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. Strict metabolic control, tight blood pressure control, laser photocoagulation, and vitrectomy remain the standard care for diabetic retinopathy. Focal/grid photocoagulation is a better treatment than intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide in eyes with diabetic macular edema and should be considered as the first-line therapeutic option. The current evidence suggests that intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents result in a temporary improvement of visual acuity and a short-term reduction in central macular thickness in patients with refractory diabetic macular edema and are an effective adjunctive treatments to laser photocoagulation or vitrectomy. However, triamcinolone is associated with risks of elevated intraocular pressure and cataract. Vitrectomy with the removal of the posterior hyaloid without internal limiting membrane peeling seems to be effective in eyes with persistent diffuse diabetic macular edema, particularly in eyes with associated vitreomacular traction. Emerging therapies include islet cell transplantation, fenofibrate, ruboxistaurin, pharmacologic vitreolysis, rennin-angiotensin system blockers, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists.

Ophthalmic manifestations of endocrine disorders: approaches and medical management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disorders of the endocrine system may present with various ophthalmic signs, symptoms, and pathology. Early detection, prevention, and monitoring of these manifestations can significantly benefit morbidity associated with such disease states including permanent visual dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several studies highlight the importance of early diagnosis in reducing the long-term complications associated with these endocrine conditions, although these observations are mostly based on case reports and case series.

SUMMARY

This review will focus on the connection of endocrine-related disease states with the development of specific ophthalmic pathology and is geared towards the general medical practitioner. The focus of the treating physician should be on facilitating early diagnosis to prevent potentially blinding complications.