MACULAR THICKNESS CHANGES AFTER PHACOEMULSIFICATION IN PREVIOUSLY VITRECTOMIZED EYES FOR DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA

Intraoperative Complications and Visual Outcomes of Cataract Surgery in Diabetes Mellitus: A Multicenter Database Study

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcome and the rate of intraoperative complications in eyes of diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing phacoemulsification over 15 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

METHODS

Data of 179,159 eyes that underwent phacoemulsification at 8 centers were classified based on the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. Visual acuity (VA) was defined as the best value of uncorrected or corrected distance measure available. For the VA analysis, eyes with co-pathologies or combined surgical procedures were further excluded, leaving a subset of 90,729 eyes. Main outcome measures were logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) VA at 4-12 weeks postoperatively, and rate of intraoperative complications.

RESULTS

Cataract surgery in eyes of diabetic patients was associated with an improvement in mean VA of 0.48 logMAR (5 Snellen lines). Mean postoperative VA was slightly worse in diabetic compared to nondiabetic group (logMAR 0.23 vs 0.13; Snellen 20/30 vs 20/25; P < .0001) and the proportions of eyes achieving a visual gain of ≥3 Snellen lines (≥0.3 logMAR) was lower in the diabetic group (56.6% vs 63.5%; P < .0001). There was a linear relationship between diabetic retinopathy severity and worse postoperative visual acuity (β coefficient 0.098 to 0.288; P < .0001). We observed higher rates of posterior capsule rupture (2.3% vs 1.6%; P < .001) and dropped nuclear fragments (0.3% vs 0.2%; P < .001) in the diabetic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative VA negatively correlated with diabetes and diabetic retinopathy severity. Eyes of diabetic subjects had higher risks of posterior capsule rupture.

Risk Factors and Incidence of Macular Edema after Cataract Surgery: A Database Study of 81984 Eyes

PURPOSE

To define the incidence of pseudophakic macular edema (PME) after cataract surgery and to identify contributory risk factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective database study of electronic medical records (EMRs).

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 81984 eyes undergoing cataract surgery between December 2010 and December 2014 from 8 independent United Kingdom clinical sites.

METHODS

Structured clinical data mandated by the EMR were anonymized and extracted for each eye undergoing cataract surgery including: perioperative visual acuity, copathologic features, simultaneous surgical procedures, and the presence or absence of a specified list of intraoperative complications. Diabetic status with matched Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grading also was mandated by the EMR. Eyes receiving prophylactic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Diagnosis of cystoid macular edema or new-onset macular edema in patients with diabetes, recorded by a healthcare professional within 90 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Baseline incidence of PME in eyes without operative complications, diabetes, or risk factors was 1.17%. Eyes in which PME developed were more likely to be male, older, and to demonstrate risk factors. The relative risk (RR) was increased in eyes with capsule rupture with or without vitreous loss (RR, 2.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-4.34), a previous diagnosis of epiretinal membrane (RR, 5.60; 95% CI, 3.45-9.07), uveitis (RR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.50-5.51), retinal vein occlusion (RR, 4.47; 95% CI, 2.56-5.92), or retinal detachment repair (RR, 3.93; 95% CI, 2.60-5.92). High myopia, age-related macular degeneration, or prostaglandin analog use were not shown to increase risk. Eyes with PME on average had poorer postoperative visual acuity, which persisted to the latest time point assessed, up to 24 weeks. Eyes from patients with diabetes, even in the absence of retinopathy, had an increased RR (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.36-2.36) of new macular edema after surgery. The risk was higher in the presence of any diabetic retinopathy (DR; RR, 6.23; 95% CI, 5.12-7.58) and rose proportionately with increasing severity of DR.

CONCLUSIONS

Pseudophakic macular edema occurs commonly after phacoemulsification cataract surgery, even in the absence of complications and risk factors. This large retrospective study using structured EMR data quantified the RRs of PME and the risk with increasing ETDRS severity of DR. It highlights the need for prophylactic therapy, especially in those groups of eyes with the highest RRs.

Comparison of dexamethasone intravitreal implant and intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for the treatment of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema in diabetic patients

Background and objective

Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of dexa methasone (DEX) implant for the treatment of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) in diabetic patients.

Study design

This was a prospective, non-randomized, interventional case series of 43 participants. Eighteen patients were enrolled in the DEX implant group and 25 were enrolled in an intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) group.

Main outcome measures

The primary efficacy measurement was the percentage of patients who gained improvements of more than ten letters in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) during 6 months of follow-up. Other efficacy measurements included change in BCVA, change in central macular thickness (CMT), and number of retreatments. The primary safety evaluation was the percentage of patients with intraocular hypertension and variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) during 6 months of follow-up. Other adverse events, such as conjunctival hemorrhage, eye pain, secondary infection, endophthalmitis, noninfectious inflammation, retinal detachment, and implant migration, were also recorded during follow-up.

Results

At month 1, we observed that the percentage of patients gaining improvement of more than ten letters was similar in both groups (P=0.625). As patients in the IVTA group were retreated several times, this effect persisted throughout the study (P=0.941 at month 2, P=0.553 at month 3, P=0.856 at month 6). Variations in CMT were noticed at week 1 and reached their maximum at month 1. No significant difference was found between the two groups (P=0.831 at week 1, P=0.783 at month 1). At month 1, the variation in IOP reached its maximum in the DEX implant group and then decreased slightly. However, in the IVTA group, it increased continuously throughout the study. Conjunctival hemorrhage and eye pain were found in both groups, but both were rated as mild in severity, and no significant difference was found (P=0.184, P=0.766, respectively).

Conclusion

Both IVTA and DEX implants could effectively restore visual function and recover morphological change in diabetic patients with PCME for at least 6 months, but repeated intravitreal injection was required in the IVTA group. DEX implant is well tolerated. We suggest that intravitreal injection of DEX implant is a promising new therapeutic option for diabetic patients with PCME.

Effect of intracameral carbachol given during cataract surgery on macular thickness

To evaluate the effect of intracameral carbachol on foveal thickness in patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery. This retrospective study included two groups: the study group patients (group 1, n = 47 eyes) had uneventful cataract surgery and received only carbachol 0.01 % for miosis; the control group patients (group 2, n = 49 eyes) had uneventful cataract surgery without carbachol or any intracameral medication(s). The groups were compared for foveal thickness after cataract surgery. All phacoemulsification plus intraocular lens implantation surgeries were performed under local anesthesia via temporal clear corneal tunnel incisions. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated for preoperative and postoperative visual acuity (VA) and foveal thickness (FT) at 1 and 4 weeks. Optical coherence tomography was used for the FT measurements, with the MM6 map program. The patients in the study and control groups had a mean age of 57.78 ± 9.07 and 59.72 ± 8.96, respectively (p = 0.355). All eyes had a significant improvement in VA. In the study group, the mean FT at the visits before and 1 and 4 weeks after surgery was 216.87 ± 21.06, 228.81 ± 30.52, and 222.94 ± 29.91 μm, respectively. For the control group, the mean FT, before and 1 and 4 weeks after surgery, was 222.53 ± 17.66, 231.67 ± 23.08, and 225.41 ± 22.59 μm, respectively. Intracameral carbachol 0.01 % had no effect on foveal thickness in patients who underwent uneventful cataract surgery.

Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) is a common cause of visual impairment after cataract surgery. This article systematically reviews and discusses the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of PCME, with a focus on advances in the past 1-2 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of PCME has declined with the advent of modern surgical techniques. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become an important adjunct to biomicroscopy and fluorescein angiography. PCME prophylaxis with topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs remains unproven because long-term visual outcomes and comparative effectiveness studies are lacking. Chronic, refractory CME remains a therapeutic challenge, but investigational therapies with potential include corticosteroid intravitreal injections and implants, and intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments. Few studies have assessed surgical options.

SUMMARY

There is currently a lack of well designed randomized clinical trials to guide the treatment of PCME.