Autosomal recessive vitelliform macular dystrophy in a large cohort of vitelliform macular dystrophy patients

Detection of Novel BEST1 Variations in Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy Using Third-generation Sequencing

OBJECTIVE

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), a retinal degenerative disease, is characterized by central visual loss, yellowish multifocal diffuse subretinal deposits, and a dramatic decrease in the light peak on electrooculogram. The potential pathogenic mechanism involves mutations in the BEST1 gene, which encodes Ca2+-activated Cl- channels in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), resulting in degeneration of RPE and photoreceptor. In this study, the complete clinical characteristics of two Chinese ARB families were summarized.

METHODS

Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing was performed on the probands to screen for disease-causing gene mutations, and Sanger sequencing was applied to validate variants in the patients and their family members.

RESULTS

Two novel mutations, c.202T>C (chr11:61722628, p.Y68H) and c.867+97G>A, in the BEST1 gene were identified in the two Chinese ARB families. The novel missense mutation BEST1 c.202T>C (p.Y68H) resulted in the substitution of tyrosine with histidine in the N-terminal region of transmembrane domain 2 of bestrophin-1. Another novel variant, BEST1 c.867+97G>A (chr11:61725867), located in intron 7, might be considered a regulatory variant that changes allele-specific binding affinity based on motifs of important transcriptional regulators.

CONCLUSION

Our findings represent the first use of third-generation sequencing (TGS) to identify novel BEST1 mutations in patients with ARB, indicating that TGS can be a more accurate and efficient tool for identifying mutations in specific genes. The novel variants identified further broaden the mutation spectrum of BEST1 in the Chinese population.

Best Disease: Global Mutations Review, Genotype-Phenotype Correlation, and Prevalence Analysis in the Israeli Population

Purpose

To review all reported disease-causing mutations in BEST1, perform genotype-phenotype correlation, and estimate disease prevalence in the Israeli population.

Methods

Medical records of patients diagnosed with Best disease and allied diseases from nine Israeli medical centers over the past 20 years were collected, as were clinical data including ocular findings, electrophysiology results, and retina imaging. Mutation detection involved mainly whole exome sequencing and candidate gene analysis. Demographic data were obtained from the Israeli Bureau of Statistics (January 2023). A bibliometric study was also conducted to gather mutation data from online sources.

Results

A total of 134 patients were clinically diagnosed with Best disease and related conditions. The estimated prevalence of Best disease was calculated to be 1 in 127,000, with higher rates among Arab Muslims (1 in 76,000) than Jews (1 in 145,000). Genetic causes were identified in 76 individuals (57%), primarily showing autosomal-dominant inheritance due to BEST1 mutations (58 patients). Critical conserved domains were identified consisting of a high percentage of dominant missense mutations, primarily in transmembrane domains and the intracellular region (Ca2+ binding domain) of the BEST1 protein.

Conclusions

This study represents the largest cohort of patients with Best disease reported in Israel and globally. The prevalence in Israel is akin to that in Denmark but is lower than that in the United States. Critical conserved domains within the BEST1 protein are pivotal for normal functioning, and even minor missense alterations in these areas lead to a dominant disease manifestation. Genetic testing is indispensable as the gold standard for Best disease diagnosis due to the variable clinical presentation of the disease.

Typical best vitelliform dystrophy secondary to biallelic variants in BEST1

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic variants in BEST1 can cause autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive dystrophy, typically associated with distinct retinal phenotypes. In heterozygous cases, the disorder is commonly characterized by yellow sub-macular lesions in the early stages, known as Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Biallelic variants usually cause a more severe phenotype including diffuse retinal pigment epithelial irregularity and widespread generalized progressive retinopathy, known as autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). This study describes three cases with clinical changes consistent with BVMD, however, unusually associated with autosomal recessive inheritance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Detailed ophthalmic workup included comprehensive ophthalmologic examination, multimodal retinal imaging, full-field and pattern electroretinography (ERG; PERG), and electrooculogram (EOG). Genetic analysis of probands and segregation testing and fundus examination of proband relatives was performed where possible.

RESULTS

Three unrelated cases presented with a clinical phenotype typical for BVMD and were found to have biallelic disease-causing variants in BEST1. PERG P50 and ERG were normal in all cases. The EOG was subnormal (probands 1 and 3) or normal/borderline (proband 2). Probands 1 and 2 were homozygous for the BEST1 missense variant c.139C>T, p.Arg47Cys, while proband 3 was homozygous for a deletion, c.536_538delACA, p.Asn179del. The parents of proband 1 were phenotypically normal. Parents of proband 1 and 2 were heterozygous for the same missense variant.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with biallelic variants in BEST1 can present with a phenotype indistinguishable from BVMD. The same clinical phenotype may not be evident in those harboring the same variants in the heterozygous state. This has implications for genetic counselling and prognosticationA.

Paradoxical autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy-like phenotypes shown in an autosomal dominant pedigree

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and genetic characteristics of eight members from a Chinese Han family who displayed autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB)-like retinal changes in autosomal dominant (AD) inheritance pattern.

METHODS

Clinical investigations included slit-lamp, tonometry, fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, electrooculography, and ultrasound biomicroscopy. Ocular axial length measurements were collected retrospectively. The targeted exome sequencing (TES) was applied for the genetic analysis of the proband. PCR-based Sanger sequencing was performed on the family for validation and co-segregation analysis.

RESULTS

Eight members in the three-generation pedigree complained about vision loss and seven of them had detailed clinical assessments, demonstrating ocular phenotypes including extramacular and vascular arcades subretinal deposits and Arden ratio decline on electrooculography that resembled ARB. Bilateral anterior chamber structure abnormalities were observed in seven cases and three patients were diagnosed with angle-closure glaucoma. Despite clinical phenotypes supporting ARB, there was only a single heterozygous mutation of c.227T > C (p.Ile76Thr) in the BEST1 gene detected in all eight patients, which showcased AD inheritance.

CONCLUSIONS

An ARB-like phenotype could be caused by a heterozygous mutation of the BEST1 gene and inherited in an AD fashion.

Photoreceptor function and structure in retinal degenerations caused by biallelic BEST1 mutations

The only approved retinal gene therapy is for biallelic RPE65 mutations which cause a recessive retinopathy with a primary molecular defect located at the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). For a distinct recessive RPE disease caused by biallelic BEST1 mutations, a pre-clinical proof-of-concept for gene therapy has been demonstrated in canine eyes. The current study was undertaken to consider potential outcome measures for a BEST1 clinical trial in patients demonstrating a classic autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) phenotype. Spatial distribution of retinal structure showed a wide expanse of abnormalities including large intraretinal cysts, shallow serous retinal detachments, abnormalities of inner and outer segments, and an unusual prominence of the external limiting membrane. Surrounding the central macula extending from 7 to 30 deg eccentricity, outer nuclear layer was thicker than expected from a cone only retina and implied survival of many rod photoreceptors. Co-localized however, were large losses of rod sensitivity despite preserved cone sensitivities. The dissociation of rod function from rod structure observed, supports a large treatment potential in the paramacular region for biallelic bestrophinopathies.

Genetic Diagnosis for 64 Patients with Inherited Retinal Disease

The overlapping genetic and clinical spectrum in inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) creates challenges for accurate diagnoses. The goal of this work was to determine the genetic diagnosis and clinical features for patients diagnosed with an IRD. After signing informed consent, peripheral blood or saliva was collected from 64 patients diagnosed with an IRD. Genetic testing was performed on each patient in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA) certified laboratory. Mutations were verified with Sanger sequencing and segregation analysis when possible. Visual acuity was measured with a traditional Snellen chart and converted to a logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR). Fundus images of dilated eyes were acquired with the Optos® camera (Dunfermline, UK). Horizontal line scans were obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SDOCT; Spectralis, Heidelberg, Germany). Genetic testing combined with segregation analysis resolved molecular and clinical diagnoses for 75% of patients. Ten novel mutations were found and unique genotype phenotype associations were made for the genes RP2 and CEP83. Collective knowledge is thereby expanded of the genetic basis and phenotypic correlation in IRD.

A novel compound heterozygous BEST1 gene mutation in two siblings causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical features, imaging characteristics, and genetic test results associated with a novel compound heterozygous mutation of the BEST1 gene in two siblings with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

METHODS

Two siblings underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including dilated fundus examination, fundus photography, fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography, electroretinography, and electrooculography. A clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy was established based on ocular examination and multimodal retinal imaging. Subsequently, clinical exome sequencing consisting of a panel of 6670 genes was carried out to confirm the diagnosis and assess genetic alterations in the protein-coding region of the genome of the patients. The identified mutations were tested in the two affected siblings and one of their parents.

RESULTS

Two siblings (a 17-year-old female and a 15-year-old male) presented with reduced visual acuity and bilaterally symmetrical subretinal deposits of hyperautofluorescent materials in the posterior pole, which showed staining in the late phase of fluorescein angiogram. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated hyperreflective subretinal deposits and subretinal fluid accumulation. Both patients shared two mutations in the protein-coding region of the BEST1 gene, c.103G > A, p.(Glu35Lys) and c.313C > A, p.(Arg105Ser) (a novel disease-causing mutation). Sanger sequencing confirmed that the unaffected mother of the proband was carrying p.(Glu35Lys) variant in a heterozygous state.

CONCLUSIONS

We have identified and described the phenotype of a novel disease-causing mutation NM_004183.4:c.313C > A, p.(Arg105Ser) in a heterozygous state along with a previously reported mutation NM_004183.4:c.103G > A, p.(Glu35Lys) of the BEST1 gene in two related patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

Case report: Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy with macular cysts and MNV over 13-year follow-up

Purpose: To describe the phenotype and genotype of a patient with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) over a 13-year follow-up period.

Methods: The phenotype of the subject was described after a complete ophthalmological examination, which included fundus photography, optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography (FA), indocyanine green angiography (ICGA), electroretinogram (EOG), electroretinography (ERG), and multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). Genetic analyses were carried out by screening the variations via whole-exome sequencing.

Results: This patient presented with retinoschisis and cystic changes when he was 7 years old and was diagnosed with X-linked retinoschisis. In the 13th year after the first presentation, enlarged macular cysts with retinoschisis, macular neovascularization (MNV), and subretinal fluid were displayed on OCT. Autofluorescence showed hyperfluorescence corresponding to the area of retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) change. EOG showed no light peak, and the Arden ratio was less than 2.0. Whole-exome sequencing revealed compound heterozygous sequence variations (p. [Arg47Leu; Trp287*]) in the coding sequence of the BEST1 allele inherited from his parents. Thus, a diagnosis of ARB combined with secondary MNV was made.

Conclusion: Patients with compound heterozygous BEST1 mutations developed ARB, which could show significant retinoschisis at a young age. Genetic analyses, autofluorescence, and EOG are essential to diagnose ARB correctly in consequence of considerable phenotypic variations.

BEST1 novel mutation causes Bestrophinopathies in six families with distinct phenotypic diversity

PURPOSE

To report novel BEST1 variants in six Chinese families with bestrophinopathies of two different inheritance modes and analyze the intrafamilial phenotypic diversity.

METHOD

A total of 25 participants including 13 patients and 12 healthy family members from 6 Chinese families with bestrophinopathies were available for genetic and clinical analysis. All of the patients were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic evaluations and exome sequencing was performed on the probands to detect the causative variants. The pathogenicity of gene variants was predicted using silico analysis and evaluated according to ACMG guidelines. All (likely) pathogenic variants were determined by Sanger sequencing and co-segregation analyses were performed on available family members. The relevant original literature previously reported was retrieved to explore the relationship between BEST1-related gene variants and clinical features.

RESULTS

In the 6 families, 3 families (10 patients) were assigned as autosomal dominant bestrophinopathies (VMD) and 3 families (3 patients) were assigned as Autosomal recessive Bestrophinopathies (ARB). A total of 9 variants on the BEST1 gene were identified, containing 7 missense variants, 1 nonsense variant, and 1 frameshift variant, respectively, of which 3 variants c.88A > G (p.Lys30Glu), c.764G > A (p.Arg255Gln) and c.233dupT (p.Ser79Phefs*153) were novel variants. Three families with ARB were detected with heterozygous variants on the BEST1 gene.2 families (8 patients) with BVMD showed markedly irregular dominant inheritance, and the severity of macular lesions varies greatly among individuals of the same family. Among them, the probands showed typical vitelliform lesions in the macula, while the other six patients had no visible signs of the disease by fundus photography (ophthalmoscopy) and minor lesions could be detected on OCT in two patients, the continuity of the ellipsoidal band was interrupted with the chimeric band. The phenotypes of the patients in the three ARB families ranged from typical/atypical vitelliform lesions to extensive extramacular deposits (peripheral spots).

CONCLUSION

This study provided evidence that the phenotype of BVMD manifested irregular dominant inheritance, with patients carrying a pathogenic heterozygous variant of BEST1 to develop obvious intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, and the patients who harbor two pathogenic alleles showed recessive inheritance bestrophinopathies with distinct phenotypic diversity. Our study also emphasized the importance of comprehensive genetic analysis in patients with bestrophinopathies, and in such challenging families with distinct intrafamilial phenotypic diversity, it shall provide novel insights into phenotypic assessments of bestrophinopathies, and contribute to better diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment for these patients.

Genetic and clinical features of BEST1-associated retinopathy based on 59 Chinese families and database comparisons

Variants in BEST1 are one of the most common cause of retinopathy mainly involving the retinal pigment epithelium with both dominant and recessive traits. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of potential pathogenic variants (PPVs) in BEST1 and their associated clinical features. Variants in BEST1 were collected from our in-house exome sequencing data and systematically evaluated by in silico prediction tools as well as genotype-phenotype analysis. The pathogenicity features of the BEST1 variants were further assessed through database comparison among the in-house data, Genome Aggregation Database from the general population, and all previously published literature. The clinical information of the in-house patients was summarized. The PPVs in BEST1 were identified in 66 patients from 59 families, including 32 families with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and 27 families with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). These PPVs included 31 missense variants, seven truncation variants, one in-frame deletion, and a known 3-untranslated region variant. All the truncations detected in our study were exclusively involved in ARB but not BVMD. Among the 31 missense variants, 18 missenses associated with BVMD in the dominant trait were clustered in four hotspot regions with statistically significant differences from the recessive missenses. Except for distinct macular changes, there were no statistically significant differences among the other associated clinical features between BVMD and ARB, including peripheral retinopathy, high hyperopia, and angle-closure glaucoma. In conclusion, BEST1-associated dominant retinopathy was preferentially caused by missense variants located in important functional regions. Truncations were most likely benign in heterozygous status. Future studies are expected to elucidate the mystery of the same missense variants contributing to both BVMD and ARB.

Clinical Features and Genetic Findings of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a rare subtype of bestrophinopathy caused by biallelic mutations of the BEST1 gene. ARB is characterized by multifocal subretinal deposits accompanied by macular edema or subretinal fluid, hyperopia, co-existing narrow angle, and a marked decrease in electrooculogram. However, little is known about the genetic variants and specific clinical features of ARB. This is an observational case series of patients with a clinical and genetic diagnosis of ARB who underwent multimodal imaging. We describe ten patients from nine unrelated families with six known variants and three novel missense variants: c.236C→T, p.(Ser79Phe); C.452C→T, p.(Leu151Pro); and c.650C→T, p.(Trp217Met). The most common variant was c.584C→T, p.(Ala195Val), observed in six patients, without correlation to the severity of the phenotype. All patients manifested bilateral multifocal subretinal deposits and subretinal fluid throughout the follow-up period, while intraretinal fluid was found in approximately half of the eyes. The extent or chronicity of the fluid collection did not correlate with visual acuity. Angle-closure glaucoma was present in five eyes. Three patients had a genetically confirmed family history of ARB, and one patient had a clinically suspected family history. This study reveals novel mutations in the BEST1 gene and adds to the spectrum of clinical presentations of ARB.

Impaired Bestrophin Channel Activity in an iPSC-RPE Model of Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) from an Early Onset Patient Carrying the P77S Dominant Mutation

Best Vitelliform Macular dystrophy (BVMD) is the most prevalent of the distinctive retinal dystrophies caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene. This gene, which encodes for a homopentameric calcium-activated ion channel, is crucial for the homeostasis and function of the retinal pigment epithelia (RPE), the cell type responsible for recycling the visual pigments generated by photoreceptor cells. In BVMD patients, mutations in this gene induce functional problems in the RPE cell layer with an accumulation of lipofucsin that evolves into cell death and loss of sight. In this work, we employ iPSC-RPE cells derived from a patient with the p.Pro77Ser dominant mutation to determine the correlation between this variant and the ocular phenotype. To this purpose, gene and protein expression and localization are evaluated in iPSC-RPE cells along with functional assays like phagocytosis and anion channel activity. Our cell model shows no differences in gene expression, protein expression/localization, or phagocytosis capacity, but presents an increased chloride entrance, indicating that the p.Pro77Ser variant might be a gain-of-function mutation. We hypothesize that this variant disturbs the neck region of the BEST1 channel, affecting channel function but maintaining cell homeostasis in the short term. This data shed new light on the different phenotypes of dominant mutations in BEST1, and emphasize the importance of understanding its molecular mechanisms. Furthermore, the data widen the knowledge of this pathology and open the door for a better diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.

Disease expression caused by different variants in the BEST1 gene: genotype and phenotype findings in bestrophinopathies

Purpose:

To analyse the spectrum of clinical features and molecular genetic data in a series of patients carrying likely disease-associated variants in the BEST1 gene.

Methods:

Retrospective observational analysis of clinical data extracted from the medical records of visual function, multimodal imaging and electrophysiology of 62 eyes of 31 patients. Molecular genetic analysis was performed by means of panel-based NGS or Sanger sequencing.

Results:

The spectrum of variants in the BEST1 gene comprised 19 different variants and three of which are novel. Fundus photographs and OCT images allowed categorization of 52 eyes as Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) with stages 1 to 5 and 10 eyes with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), with more severe phenotype. One patient was shown to be heterozygous for a variant, which has so far been described only in ARB, but this patient had the BVMD phenotype. There was no significant progression of the visual acuity during the follow-up period of 5 years both in BVMD and ARB. The most prevalent pattern of fundus autofluorescence (FAF) in BVMD was ‘patchy’. There were diverse visual field defects in static automated perimetry (SAP) depending on the stage. The Arden ratio was significantly lower in ARB patients and in eyes with stage 5 of BVMD.

Conclusions:

The genotype does not always predict the phenotype in patients with BVMD and ARB; however, having two mutations in the BEST1 gene causes a more severephenotype. FAFhelped to distinguish ARB from BVMD. Most of the observed eyesdidnotprogressfunctionallyduringthefollow-up.ARBandtheatrophicstageof BVMD as the disease end-stage had the worst visual functions and EOG results.

Updating the Genetic Landscape of Inherited Retinal Dystrophies

Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) are a group of diseases characterized by the loss or dysfunction of photoreceptors and a high genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Currently, over 270 genes have been associated with IRD which makes genetic diagnosis very difficult. The recent advent of next generation sequencing has greatly facilitated the diagnostic process, enabling to provide the patients with accurate genetic counseling in some cases. We studied 92 patients who were clinically diagnosed with IRD with two different custom panels. In total, we resolved 53 patients (57.6%); in 12 patients (13%), we found only one mutation in a gene with a known autosomal recessive pattern of inheritance; and 27 patients (29.3%) remained unsolved. We identified 120 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants; 30 of them were novel. Among the cone-rod dystrophy patients, ABCA4 was the most common mutated gene, meanwhile, USH2A was the most prevalent among the retinitis pigmentosa patients. Interestingly, 10 families carried pathogenic variants in more than one IRD gene, and we identified two deep-intronic variants previously described as pathogenic in ABCA4 and CEP290. In conclusion, the IRD study through custom panel sequencing demonstrates its efficacy for genetic diagnosis, as well as the importance of including deep-intronic regions in their design. This genetic diagnosis will allow patients to make accurate reproductive decisions, enroll in gene-based clinical trials, and benefit from future gene-based treatments.

Phenotypic and Genetic Spectrum of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy and Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy

Purpose

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and vitelliform macular dystrophy (VMD) are distinct phenotypes, typically inherited through recessive and dominant patterns, respectively. Recessively inherited VMD (arVMD) has been reported, suggesting that dominant and recessive BEST1-related retinopathies represent a single disease spectrum. This study compares adVMD, arVMD, and ARB to determine whether a continuum exists and to define clinical and genetic features to aid diagnosis and management.

Methods

One arVMD patient and nine ARB patients underwent standard ophthalmic examination, imaging, electrophysiology, and genetic assessments. A meta-analysis of reported BEST1 variants was compiled, and clinical parameters were analyzed with regard to inheritance and phenotype.

Results

Among 10 patients with biallelic BEST1 variants, three novel ARB variants (p.Asp118Ala, p.Leu224Gln, p.Val273del) were discovered. A patient with homozygous p.Glu35Lys was clinically unique, presenting with VMD, including hyperautofluorescence extending beyond the macula, peripheral punctate lesions, and shortened axial-length. A tritan-axis color vision deficit was seen in three of six (50%) of ARB patients. Attempts to distinguish recessively-inherited ARB and dominantly-inherited VMD genotypically, by variant frequency and residue location, did not yield significant differences. Literature meta-analysis with principle component analysis of clinical features demonstrated a spectrum of disease with arVMD falling between adVMD and ARB.

Conclusions

This study suggests that arVMD is part of a continuum of autosomal recessive and dominant BEST1-related retinopathies. Detailed clinical and molecular assessments of this cohort and the literature are corroborated by unsupervised analysis, highlighting the overlapping heterogeneity among BEST1-associated clinical diagnoses. Tritan-axis color vision deficit is a previously unreported finding associated with ARB.

A novel phenotype in a family with autosomal dominant retinal dystrophy due to c.1430A > G in retinoid isomerohydrolase (RPE65) and c.37C > T in bestrophin 1 (BEST1)

PURPOSE

The c.1430A > G (Asp477Gly) variant in RPE65 has been reported in Irish and Scottish families with either an autosomal dominant retinal dystrophy (adRD) that resembles choroideremia, a vitelliform macular dystrophy or an isolated macular atrophy. We report novel features on multimodal imaging and the natural history of a family harbouring this variant in combination with the BEST1 c.37C > T (Arg13Cys) variant.

METHODS

Members of a family with an adRD were examined clinically to ascertain phenotype and underwent genetic testing. Multimodal imaging included widefield colour fundus photography, quantitative autofluorescence (qAF) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Electrophysiology and microperimetry were also performed.

RESULTS

Vision loss was attributed to foveal atrophy in the proband and choroidal neovascularisation and a vitello-eruptive lesion in one affected son. Peripheral retinal white dots corresponding to subretinal deposits were seen in three patients. The median qAF₈ values in the proband (I:1) were low (40 and 101 in OD and OS) at age 79. Similarly, the qAF₈ values for the middle son (II:2) were also low (100 and 87 in ODS and OS) at age 60. Electrophysiology showed disproportionate reduction in Arden ratio prior to the gradual loss of full-field responses. Microperimetry demonstrated an enlarging scotoma in the proband.

CONCLUSIONS

The coexistence of the pathogenic BEST1 c.37C > T variant may modify clinical features observed in RPE65 adRD. This study expands our understanding of RPE65 adRD as a retinoid cycle disorder supported by the reduced qAF, fine white retinal dots and corresponding subretinal deposits on OCT in affected members.

Association of Clinical and Genetic Heterogeneity With BEST1 Sequence Variations

Importance

Detailed phenotypic information on the spectrum of fundus abnormalities and clinical variability of all phenotypes associated with sequence variations in BEST1 is limited.

Objective

To report a detailed phenotypic and genetic analysis of a patient cohort with sequence variations in BEST1.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective case series took place at the Oxford Eye Hospital in Oxford, UK. Thirty-six patients from a single center with disease-causing sequence variations in BEST1 from 25 different families were analyzed. Data were collected from November 2017 to June 2018, and analysis began April 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Results of ocular phenotyping and genetic testing using targeted next-generation sequencing to identify BEST1 sequence variations.

Results

Thirty-six patients from 25 families with disease-causing sequence variations in BEST1 were included. Of 36 patients, 20 (55.6%) were female. Three distinct clinical phenotypes were identified: autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), and adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy. The ARB phenotype group comprised 18 patients from 9 families with age in years at symptom onset ranging from less than 10 to 40s. All patients showed a common phenotype of fundus autofluorescence abnormalities, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography features were similar in all patients with schitic and cystoid changes. A phenotype of a beaten metallic retinal appearance extending from the mid periphery to the far periphery was identified in 8 patients. Four patients from 1 family with ARB were previously reported to have autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa but were reclassified as having ARB as part of this study. The BVMD phenotype group comprised 16 patients from 14 families with age at symptom onset ranging from less than 10 to 70s. Fundus features were localized to the macula and consistent with the stage of BVMD. In the adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy phenotype group, the age in years at symptom onset varied from 50s to 70s in 2 patients from 2 families. Fundus features included small vitelliform lesions. Where available, electro-oculogram results demonstrated a reduced or absent light rise in all patients with ARB and BVMD. Genetic testing identified 22 variants in BEST1.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings support the notion that ARB, BVMD, and adult-onset vitelliform macular dystrophy are clinically distinct and recognizable phenotypes and suggest that the association of autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa with sequence variations in BEST1 should be rereviewed.

NOVEL BEST1 MUTATIONS DETECTED BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING IN A CHINESE POPULATION WITH VITELLIFORM MACULAR DYSTROPHY

PURPOSE

To characterize novel BEST1 mutations and the phenotype-genotype correlations in vitelliform macular dystrophy in a Chinese population.

METHODS

Seventeen individuals affected by vitelliform macular dystrophy underwent detailed ophthalmic examinations, including a best-corrected visual acuity test, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography angiography. Next-generation sequencing was used to screen 790 genes frequently involved in common inherited nonsyndromic eye diseases in all participants. Sanger sequencing was used to identify possible disease-causing variants.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD age of the patients was 44.20 ± 15.09 (range: 16-69) years. Seven novel BEST1 mutations were identified: six heterozygous missense (p.Thr307Asn, p.Ile295The, p.Leu75Pro, p.Thr2Ser, p.Ser79Tyr, and p.Val81Leu) and one frameshift (p.Glu115GlufsX120) mutation. Choroidal neovascularization was detected in two probands. One individual presented with subfoveal focal choroidal excavation. Arden ratios obtained by electrooculography were less than the 1.5 cutoff value in 7 patients. No mutations were identified in 2 patients, one of whom had a fundus appearance typical of vitelliform macular dystrophy and a decreased Arden ratio (1.2/1.2).

CONCLUSION

Patients with the same heterozygous BEST1 mutations exhibited varying phenotypes. Our results have expanded the BEST1 mutation spectrum in a Chinese population with vitelliform macular dystrophy.

The Clinical Features and Genetic Spectrum of a Large Cohort of Chinese Patients With Vitelliform Macular Dystrophies

PURPOSE

To provide the clinical and genetic characteristics of a large cohort of Chinese patients with vitelliform macular dystrophies.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-four unrelated Chinese patients diagnosed with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), or adult vitelliform macular dystrophy (AVMD) were enrolled. Detailed ophthalmic examinations and genetic testing on vitelliform macular dystrophy-related genes were performed. Genotype and phenotype association were analyzed among different diagnostic groups.

RESULTS

In total, 87 BVMD, 30 AVMD, and 17 ARB patients were enrolled in this study. Genetic analysis identified 37 BEST1 mutations in 53 patients with BVMD and ARB. Of these, 5 variants (c.254A>C, c.291C>G, c.722C>G, c.848_850del, c.1740-2A>C) were novel. The variant c.898G>A was a hotspot mutation, which was identified in 13 patients with BVMD and 1 patient with ARB. There were significant differences of ocular biometric parameters among patients with homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations, heterozygous mutations, and those without mutations of BEST1. Homozygous or compound heterozygous patients had shortest axial length (AL), shallowest anterior chamber depth (ACD), and highest intraocular pressure (IOP); patients without mutations had longest AL, deepest ACD, and lowest IOP; and heterozygous patients were in between. Moreover, 7 patients harboring heterozygous mutations in BEST1 and 3 patients without BEST1 mutations showed similar clinical appearance to ARB in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest sample size study of Chinese vitelliform macular dystrophy patients. Our results indicated that assessment of angle-closure risk is a necessary consideration for all types of BEST1-related vitelliform macular dystrophies. The study expanded both the clinical and genetic findings of 3 common types of vitelliform macular dystrophies in a Chinese population.

IMAGING OF VITELLIFORM MACULAR LESIONS USING POLARIZATION-SENSITIVE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY

PURPOSE

To examine the involvement of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) in the presence of vitelliform macular lesions (VML) in Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy, and adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT).

METHODS

A total of 35 eyes of 18 patients were imaged using a PS-OCT system and blue light fundus autofluorescence imaging. Pathogenic mutations in the BEST1 gene, 3 of which were new, were detected in all patients with BVMD and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

RESULTS

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography showed a characteristic pattern in all three diseases with nondepolarizing material in the subretinal space consistent with the yellowish VML seen on funduscopy with a visible RPE line below it. A focal RPE thickening was seen in 26 eyes under or at the edge of the VML. Retinal pigment epithelium thickness outside the VML was normal or mildly thinned in patients with BVMD and adult-onset vitelliform macular degeneration but was diffusely thinned or atrophic in patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy. Patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy showed sub-RPE fibrosis alongside the subretinal VML. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography was more reliable in assessing the localization and the integrity of the RPE than spectral domain OCT alone. On spectral domain OCT, identification of the RPE was not possible in 19.4% of eyes. Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography allowed for definite identification of the location of VML in respect to the RPE in all eyes, since it provides a tissue-specific contrast.

CONCLUSION

Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography confirms in vivo the subretinal location of VML and is useful in the assessment of RPE integrity.

Familial autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy: identification of a novel variant in BEST1 gene and the specific metabolomic profile

BACKGROUND

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a retinal degenerative disorder caused by BEST1 mutations with autosomal recessive inheritance. We aim to map a comprehensive genomic and metabolomic profile of a consanguineous Chinese family with ARB.

METHODS

Ophthalmic examinations were performed on the affected patients with ARB. The proband was screened for potential causative mutations in a panel with 256 known retinal disease genes by using target capture sequencing. The related mutation was further validated and segregated in the family members by Sanger sequencing. In silico prediction tools were used for pathogenicity assessment. A UHPLC-MS/MS metabolomic analysis was performed to explore the disease-associated metabolic feature.

RESULTS

The affected patients from this family were characterized by low vision, the presence of subretinal fluid, macular edema, and hyperopia with coincidental angle closure. DNA sequencing identified a novel missense mutation in the BEST1 gene c.646G > A (p.Val216Ile) of the proband. Sanger sequencing further confirmed the mutation. The missense mutation was co-segregation across the pedigree and predicted to be deleterious by SIFT (0.017). The blood metabolic profiles were highly similar among all family members probably because of the same lifestyle, habitat and genomic background. However, ARB patients presented a significant deregulation of metabolites, such as citric acid, L-Threonic acid, and eicosapentaenoic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a novel disease-associated variant in the BEST1 gene as well as a disease-specific metabolic feature in familial ARB. Our findings helped improve the understanding of ARB mechanisms.

Clinical and Genetic Findings of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB)

Mutations in BEST1 cause several phenotypes including autosomal dominant (AD) Best vitelliform macular dystrophy type 2 (BVMD), AD vitreo-retino-choroidopathy (ADVIRC), and retinitis pigmentosa-50 (RP50). A rare subtype of Bestrophinopathy exists with biallelic mutations in BEST1. Its frequency is estimated to be 1/1,000,000 individuals. Here we report 6 families and searched for a genotype-phenotype correlation. All patients were referred due to reduced best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ranging from 0.1/10 to 3/10. They all showed vitelliform lesions located at the macula, sometimes extending into the midperiphery, along the vessels and the optic disc. Onset of the disease varied from the age of 3 to 25 years. Electrooculogram (EOG) revealed reduction in the EOG light rise in all patients. Molecular analysis revealed previously reported mutations p.(E35K);(E35K), p.(L31M);(L31M), p.(R141H);(A195V), p.(R202W);(R202W), and p.(Q220*);(Q220*) in five families. One family showed a novel mutation: p.(E167G);(E167G). All mutations were heterozygous in the parents. In one family, heterozygous children showed various reductions in the EOG light rise and autofluorescent deposits. Autosomal recessive Bestrophinopathy (ARB), although rare, can be recognized by its phenotype and should be validated by molecular analysis. Genotype-phenotype correlations are difficult to establish and will require the analysis of additional cases.

Pathogenicity of new BEST1 variants identified in Italian patients with best vitelliform macular dystrophy assessed by computational structural biology

Background

Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) is an autosomal dominant macular degeneration. The typical central yellowish yolk-like lesion usually appears in childhood and gradually worsens. Most cases are caused by variants in the BEST1 gene which encodes bestrophin-1, an integral membrane protein found primarily in the retinal pigment epithelium.

Methods

Here we describe the spectrum of BEST1 variants identified in a cohort of 57 Italian patients analyzed by Sanger sequencing. In 13 cases, the study also included segregation analysis in affected and unaffected relatives. We used molecular mechanics to calculate two quantitative parameters related to calcium-activated chloride channel (CaCC composed of 5 BEST1 subunits) stability and calcium-dependent activation and related them to the potential pathogenicity of individual missense variants detected in the probands.

Results

Thirty-six out of 57 probands (63% positivity) and 16 out of 18 relatives proved positive to genetic testing. Family study confirmed the variable penetrance and expressivity of the disease. Six of the 27 genetic variants discovered were novel: p.(Val9Gly), p.(Ser108Arg), p.(Asn179Asp), p.(Trp182Arg), p.(Glu292Gln) and p.(Asn296Lys). All BEST1 variants were assessed in silico for potential pathogenicity. Our computational structural biology approach based on 3D model structure of the CaCC showed that individual amino acid replacements may affect channel shape, stability, activation, gating, selectivity and throughput, and possibly also other features, depending on where the individual mutated amino acid residues are located in the tertiary structure of BEST1. Statistically significant correlations between mean logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), age and modulus of computed BEST1 dimerization energies, which reflect variations in the in CaCC stability due to amino acid changes, permitted us to assess the pathogenicity of individual BEST1 variants.

Conclusions

Using this computational approach, we designed a method for estimating BCVA progression in patients with BEST1 variants.

Mutation spectrum of the bestrophin-1 gene in a large Chinese cohort with bestrophinopathy

Background

Bestrophin-1 (BEST1) gene is associated with a wide range of ocular phenotypes, collectively termed as bestrophinopathy. The aim of the current study was to identify the mutation spectrum of BEST1 in a large cohort of Chinese patients with bestrophinopathy.

Methods

Patients clinically suspected of bestrophinopathy were screened using multigene panel testing. All BEST1 variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing, and validated in the families.

Findings

A total of 92 patients (Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD)=77; autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB)=15) from 58 unrelated families of Chinese origin and their available family members (n=65) were recruited. Overall, 39 distinct disease-causing BEST1 variants were identified, including 13 novel variants, and two reported variants but novel for ARB. Of them, 14 were associated with ARB, 23 with BVMD and two (c.604C>T and c.898G>A) with both BVMD and ARB. Most mutations associated with BVMD were missense (97.78%), while ARB was associated with more complex mutations, including missense (88.46%), splicing effect (3.85%), and frameshifts (15.38%). BEST1 hotspots were c.898G>A and c.584C>T among BVMD and ARB patients, respectively. Hot regions were located in exons 8, 2 and 6 in BVMD patients, and in exons 5 and 7 in ARB patients. The overall penetrance of BEST1 in our cohort was 71.30%, no de novo mutations were identified.

Conclusion

This is the largest study to date that provides major population-based data of the BEST1 mutation spectrum in China. Our results can serve as a well-founded reference for genetic counselling for patients with bestrophinopathy of Chinese origin.

Novel Missense Mutations in BEST1 Are Associated with Bestrophinopathies in Lebanese Patients

To identify Bestrophin 1 (BEST1) causative mutations in six Lebanese patients from three families, of whom four had a presumed clinical diagnosis of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and two showed a phenotype with a single vitelliform lesion, patients were subjected to standard ophthalmic examinations. In addition, BEST1 exons and their flanking regions were amplified and sequenced by Sanger sequencing. Co-segregation and detailed bio-informatic analyses were performed. Clinical examination results were consistent with ARB diagnosis for all index patients showing multifocal vitelliform lesions and a markedly reduced light peak in the electrooculogram, including the two patients with a single vitelliform lesion. In all cases, most likely disease-causing BEST1 mutations co-segregated with the phenotype. The ARB cases showed homozygous missense variants (M1, c.209A>G, p.(Asp70Gly) in exon 3, M2, c.1403C>T; p.(Pro468Leu) in exon 10 and M3, c.830C>T, p.(Thr277Met) in exon 7), while the two patients with a single vitelliform lesion were compound heterozygous for M1 and M2. To our knowledge, this is the first study describing mutations in Lebanese patients with bestrophinopathy, where novel biallelic BEST1 mutations associated with two phenotypes were identified. Homozygous mutations were associated with multifocal lesions, subretinal fluid, and intraretinal cysts, whereas compound heterozygous ones were responsible for a single macular vitelliform lesion.

Clinical and Mutation Analysis of Patients with Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy or Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy in Chinese Population

Mutations in the gene BEST1 usually cause bestrophinopathies, such as the rare progressive diseases Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with BVMD or ARB carrying BEST1 mutations. A total of 12 probands including 9 patients with a clinical diagnosis of BVMD and 3 patients with a clinical diagnosis of ARB were recruited for genetics analysis. All patients underwent detailed ophthalmic examination. All coding exons of the BEST1 gene were screened by PCR-based DNA sequencing. Programs of PolyPhen-2, SIFT, and MutationTaster were used to analyze the potential pathogenicity of the mutations in BEST1. In the 9 unrelated patients with BVMD, one heterozygous BEST1 mutation was revealed in 8 patients and two compound heterozygous mutations in 1 patient. In the 3 unrelated patients with ARB, two compound heterozygous mutations were revealed in 2 patients and three compound heterozygous mutations in 1 patient. Molecular analyses identified a total of 15 mutations, including 3 novel mutations (c.424A>G p.S142G, c.436G>A p.A146T, and c.155T>C p.L52P). Antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs were given to two affected eyes, especially those also exhibiting choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and no serious adverse events occurred. Our study indicates that there is wide genotypic and phenotypic variability in patients with BVMD or ARB in China. The screening of BEST1 gene is significant for the precise diagnosis of BVMD and ARB.

Next generation sequencing identifies novel disease-associated BEST1 mutations in Bestrophinopathy patients

Bestinopathies are a spectrum of retinal disorders associated with mutations in BEST1 including autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). We applied whole-exome sequencing on four unrelated Indian families comprising eight affected and twelve unaffected individuals. We identified five mutations in BEST1, including p.Tyr131Cys in family A, p.Arg150Pro in family B, p.Arg47His and p.Val216Ile in family C and p.Thr91Ile in family D. Among these, p.Tyr131Cys, p.Arg150Pro and p.Val216Ile have not been previously reported. Further, the inheritance pattern of BEST1 mutations in the families confirmed the diagnosis of ARB in probands in families A, B and C, while the inheritance of heterozygous BEST1 mutation in family D (p.Thr91Ile) was suggestive of BVMD. Interestingly, the ARB families A and B carry homozygous mutations while family C was a compound heterozygote with a mutation in an alternate BEST1 transcript isoform, highlighting a role for alternate BEST1 transcripts in bestrophinopathy. In the BVMD family D, the heterozygous BEST1 mutation found in the proband was also found in the asymptomatic parent, suggesting an incomplete penetrance and/or the presence of additional genetic modifiers. Our report expands the list of pathogenic BEST1 genotypes and the associated clinical diagnosis.

BEST1 gene therapy corrects a diffuse retina-wide microdetachment modulated by light exposure

One of the most common forms of monogenic macular degeneration worldwide is caused by dominant or recessive bestrophinopathies associated with mutations in the BEST1 gene. Disease expression is known to start with a retina-wide electrophysiological defect leading to localized vitelliform and atrophic lesions and vision loss. To develop lasting therapies for this incurable disease, there is a need for greater understanding of the early pathophysiology before lesion formation. Here we find that the loss of retinal pigment epithelium apical microvilli and resulting microdetachment of the retina represent the earliest features of canine bestrophinopathies. We show that retinal light exposure expands, and dark adaptation contracts, the microdetachments. Subretinal adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy corrects both the vitelliform lesions and the light-modulated microdetachments.

Mutations in the BEST1 gene cause detachment of the retina and degeneration of photoreceptor (PR) cells due to a primary channelopathy in the neighboring retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells. The pathophysiology of the interaction between RPE and PR cells preceding the formation of retinal detachment remains not well-understood. Our studies of molecular pathology in the canine BEST1 disease model revealed retina-wide abnormalities at the RPE-PR interface associated with defects in the RPE microvillar ensheathment and a cone PR-associated insoluble interphotoreceptor matrix. In vivo imaging demonstrated a retina-wide RPE–PR microdetachment, which contracted with dark adaptation and expanded upon exposure to a moderate intensity of light. Subretinal BEST1 gene augmentation therapy using adeno-associated virus 2 reversed not only clinically detectable subretinal lesions but also the diffuse microdetachments. Immunohistochemical analyses showed correction of the structural alterations at the RPE–PR interface in areas with BEST1 transgene expression. Successful treatment effects were demonstrated in three different canine BEST1 genotypes with vector titers in the 0.1-to-5E11 vector genomes per mL range. Patients with biallelic BEST1 mutations exhibited large regions of retinal lamination defects, severe PR sensitivity loss, and slowing of the retinoid cycle. Human translation of canine BEST1 gene therapy success in reversal of macro- and microdetachments through restoration of cytoarchitecture at the RPE–PR interface has promise to result in improved visual function and prevent disease progression in patients affected with bestrophinopathies.

Patient-specific mutations impair BESTROPHIN1's essential role in mediating Ca2+-dependent Cl- currents in human RPE

Mutations in the human BEST1 gene lead to retinal degenerative diseases displaying progressive vision loss and even blindness. BESTROPHIN1, encoded by BEST1, is predominantly expressed in retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), but its physiological role has been a mystery for the last two decades. Using a patient-specific iPSC-based disease model and interdisciplinary approaches, we comprehensively analyzed two distinct BEST1 patient mutations, and discovered mechanistic correlations between patient clinical phenotypes, electrophysiology in their RPEs, and the structure and function of BESTROPHIN1 mutant channels. Our results revealed that the disease-causing mechanism of BEST1 mutations is centered on the indispensable role of BESTROPHIN1 in mediating the long speculated Ca²⁺-dependent Cl^- current in RPE, and demonstrate that the pathological potential of BEST1 mutations can be evaluated and predicted with our iPSC-based 'disease-in-a-dish' approach. Moreover, we demonstrated that patient RPE is rescuable with viral gene supplementation, providing a proof-of-concept for curing BEST1-associated diseases.

Bestrophin 1 gene analysis and associated clinical findings in a Chinese patient with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy

The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical characteristics and the underlying genetic causes of Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD) in a sporadic case in a Chinese patient. A 10‑year‑old boy was diagnosed with BVMD; complete ophthalmic examinations were performed, including best‑corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit‑lamp examination, fundus photograph, optical coherence tomography and fundus fluorescein angiography imaging. Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocytes of the peripheral blood collected from this patient and his family members. DNA samples from 200 unrelated subjects from the Chinese population were used as controls. A total of 11 exons of the bestrophin 1 (BEST1) gene were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and directly sequenced. The results revealed that the patient presented with yellowish lesions in the macular area. Heterozygous mutations c.292G>A (p.Glu98Lys) in exon 4 and c.1608C>T (p.Thr536Thr) in exon 10 of the BEST1 gene were identified in this sporadic case; however, this was not identified in any of his unaffected family members or in the normal controls. The c.292G>A (p.Glu98Lys) mutation has not been previously reported, whereas the c.1608C>T (p.Thr536Thr) mutation is a previously characterized single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). In conclusion, BEST1 gene mutations and polymorphisms have been reported in diverse ethnic groups, and the present study identified a novel BEST1 gene mutation and an SNP that occurred simultaneously in a Chinese patient with BVMD.

Novel Presenting Phenotype in a Child With Autosomal Dominant Best's Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy

Best's macular dystrophy (BMD) usually manifests with visual failure in the first or second decade of life; however, there is a large variability in expressivity of the disease, and some patients have no manifestation other than a pathological electro-oculogram (EOG). Autosomal dominant Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy (AD-BVMD) has a very specific phenotype that varies with the stage of the disease. In recent years, the authors have seen description of another clinical entity known as autosomal recessive BMD. Herein, the authors describe a 5-year-old girl referred from a peripheral hospital for investigation with a positive family history of BMD. Clinical findings included best-corrected visual acuity of 0.325 and 0.300 in the right and left eyes, respectively, by Sonksen logMar test, full color vision, normal orthoptic examination, and a small degree of hyperopia consistent with age. Macular optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed intraretinal fluid cysts and EOG showed reduced Arden ratio. Genetic testing was done for the proband and her father, who were found to be heterozygous for c.37C>T p. (Arg13Cys). The proband's younger sister will be reviewed and followed up once of age. The authors identified a new phenotype of AD-BVMD; although this is a single patient, more young children with BMD can now be scanned with the availability of hand-held OCT with better knowledge of the phenotype. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2017;48:580-585.].

NORMAL ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY IN BEST DISEASE AND AUTOSOMAL RECESSIVE BESTROPHINOPATHY

PURPOSE

To evaluate the electrooculogram (EOG) in a large series of patients with Best disease and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

METHODS

A retrospective review of consecutive cases at Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Patients with Best disease or autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy who, after electrophysiologic testing, had a normal or atypical EOG light rise were identified. Main outcome measure was EOG amplitude, clinical phenotype and genotype.

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen patients were identified with likely disease-causing sequence variants in BEST1 (99 Best disease and 14 autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy). Electrooculograms had been performed in 75 patients. Twenty patients (27%) had no detectable light rise (Arden ratio of 100%) and 49 (65%) had Arden ratios of between 100% to 165%. Six patients (8%) were found to have an EOG light rise of >165%. No cases demonstrated significant interocular asymmetry in EOG amplitude.

CONCLUSION

The current work provides significant clinical evidence that the EOG phenotype in Best disease and autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy is more variable than currently appreciated. As a normal EOG may occur in the presence of a classical fundus appearance, the consequences of BEST1 mutation may be independently expressed, possibly mediated through differential effects on intracellular calcium homeostasis.

A unique case series of autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy exhibiting multigenerational inheritance

INTRODUCTION

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a retinal disease caused by biallelic mutations of the BEST1 gene. It has a variable phenotype with white flecks in the retina, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, macular edema, choroidal neovascularization, hyperopia, and electrophysiological abnormalities. We describe a family with ARB and multigenerational inheritance.

METHODS

Three generations of a Middle Eastern family (a woman, one son, and two grandchildren) were evaluated by our ocular genetics team. Eye examinations, fundus photography, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) were performed. Genetic testing was obtained on examined patients and available relatives.

RESULTS

The proband demonstrated counting fingers vision and white flecks in the retinal periphery, with macular subretinal fluid (SRF), loss of outer photoreceptor segments, and epiretinal membrane (ERM) on OCT. Two grandchildren demonstrated decreased vision, multifocal yellow subretinal deposits, and SRF on OCT. Two grandchildren examined elsewhere were reported to be similarly affected. A son's examination was normal except for extra-macular scars (from prior toxoplasmosis) and ERM. Genetic history revealed consanguinity and testing showed homozygosity for BEST1 mutations in the proband and two grandchildren c.473G>A/c.473G>A (R218H /R218H) and heterozygosity in two unaffected sons and two unaffected daughters-in-law c.473G>A/WT (p.R218H/WT).

DISCUSSION

We present a consanguineous family of five affected individuals with ARB and four confirmed carriers. Their pedigree was consistent with dominant inheritance and incomplete penetrance. Genetic testing clarified the diagnosis and mode of inheritance. We describe the genetic findings, phenotypic variability, and recessive inheritance of an often dominantly inherited mutation as notable elements in their case.

Bestrophinopathy: An RPE-photoreceptor interface disease

Bestrophinopathies, one of the most common forms of inherited macular degenerations, are caused by mutations in the BEST1 gene expressed in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Both human and canine BEST1-linked maculopathies are characterized by abnormal accumulation of autofluorescent material within RPE cells and bilateral macular or multifocal lesions; however, the specific mechanism leading to the formation of these lesions remains unclear. We now provide an overview of the current state of knowledge on the molecular pathology of bestrophinopathies, and explore factors promoting formation of RPE-neuroretinal separations, using the first spontaneous animal model of BEST1-associated retinopathies, canine Best (cBest). Here, we characterize the nature of the autofluorescent RPE cell inclusions and report matching spectral signatures of RPE-associated fluorophores between human and canine retinae, indicating an analogous composition of endogenous RPE deposits in Best Vitelliform Macular Dystrophy (BVMD) patients and its canine disease model. This study also exposes a range of biochemical and structural abnormalities at the RPE-photoreceptor interface related to the impaired cone-associated microvillar ensheathment and compromised insoluble interphotoreceptor matrix (IPM), the major pathological culprits responsible for weakening of the RPE-neuroretina interactions, and consequently, formation of vitelliform lesions. These salient alterations detected at the RPE apical domain in cBest as well as in BVMD- and ARB-hiPSC-RPE model systems provide novel insights into the pathological mechanism of BEST1-linked disorders that will allow for development of critical outcome measures guiding therapeutic strategies for bestrophinopathies.

A NOVEL P.ASP304GLY MUTATION IN BEST1 GENE ASSOCIATED WITH ATYPICAL BEST VITELLIFORM MACULAR DYSTROPHY PHENOTYPE AND HIGH INTRAFAMILIAL VARIABILITY

PURPOSE

To report the atypical phenotypic characteristics of patients with a novel p.Asp304Gly mutation in BEST1.

METHODS

Affected individuals underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, including best-corrected visual acuity, fundus autofluorescence, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and electrophysiologic testing. All individuals were screened for mutations in the BEST1 gene.

RESULTS

Five patients of the same Italian family were clinically examined. All patients complained of decreased vision as the initial symptom. Best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/800 to 20/32. On fundus examination, all patients showed atypical Best vitelliform macular dystrophy phenotype with multifocal macular and extramacular involvement. The spectral domain optical coherence tomography characteristics of central macular and extramacular lesions varied in each patient and included "giant" choroidal excavation, extensive flat macular elevation with hyporeflective subretinal material accumulation surrounded by hyperautofluorescent spots/annulus, and extensive hypoautofluorescent extramacular atrophic areas. Electrooculogram was always abnormal with Arden ratio lower than 1.55, whereas electroretinogram was normal in the two younger patients and abnormal (low amplitude) in the three older patients. Genetic analysis revealed a novel missense mutation in BEST1, substituting aspartate for glycine at amino acid 304.

CONCLUSION

We describe the atypical phenotype and high intrafamilial variability associated with a new mutation in the BEST1 gene in an Italian family affected with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy. Clinicians should consider screening the BEST1 gene even in the absence of the typical phenotype and in case of high intrafamilial variability.

Flat Anterior Chamber after Trabeculectomy in Secondary Angle-Closure Glaucoma with BEST1 Gene Mutation: Case Series

Purpose

Trabeculectomy has been regarded as a mainstay of initial treatment in eyes of angle closure glaucoma (ACG) with peripheral anterior synechia > 180° in the Chinese population while its efficacy in secondary ACG with BEST1 gene mutation remains unclear. We set out to investigate the treatment outcome of trabeculectomy for secondary ACG in a group of patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB).

Methods

In this retrospective case series study, 8 secondary ACG patients with ARB and their 4 recruited family members underwent a thorough ophthalmic examination including best-corrected visual acuity, Goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, and fundus examinations. Ultrasound biomicroscopy, optical coherence tomography (OCT), ultrasound A-scan, B-scan, electro-oculography (EOG), Humphrey perimetry, fundus photography, fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) were also performed. Blood samples were obtained in the patients and their available family members to analyze the variants of the BEST1 gene. Trabeculectomy was performed in the 8 patients (15 eyes).

Results

The age of onset varied from 13 to 38 years. The average axial length (AL) of the affected eyes was 21.82 ± 0.92 mm and the average anterior chamber depth (ACD) was 2.19 ± 0.29 mm. There was marked axial shallowing of the anterior chamber in all 15 eyes after trabeculectomy, and was not improved with potent mydriatics. The IOP was elevated in 3 eyes. Variable degree of yellowish subretinal deposits was observed in the posterior retina. The FFA showed punctuate or patched hyperfluorescence suggesting retinal pigment epithelium impairment. The ICGA demonstrated dilatation of choroidal vessels. The OCT revealed diffused neuroretinal detachment in the posterior and midperipheral retina, with intraretinal fluid collections, and hyperreflective subretinal accumulations. The average subfoveal choroidal thickness of the patients was 382.36 ± 80.09 μm. All the patients and enrolled family members carried mutation in BEST1 gene.

Conclusions

ARB is a rare condition with fundus manifestations mimicking various diseases. Careful discrimination should be taken to exclude any secondary causes for ACG before treatment. Concerning the high incidence of postoperative shallow anterior chamber, selection of filtering surgery should be very careful in these patients.

Distinct regions that control ion selectivity and calcium-dependent activation in the bestrophin ion channel

Cytoplasmic calcium (Ca²⁺) activates the bestrophin anion channel, allowing chloride ions to flow down their electrochemical gradient. Mutations in bestrophin 1 (BEST1) cause macular degenerative disorders. Previously, we determined an X-ray structure of chicken BEST1 that revealed the architecture of the channel. Here, we present electrophysiological studies of purified wild-type and mutant BEST1 channels and an X-ray structure of a Ca²⁺-independent mutant. From these experiments, we identify regions of BEST1 responsible for Ca²⁺ activation and ion selectivity. A "Ca²⁺ clasp" within the channel's intracellular region acts as a sensor of cytoplasmic Ca²⁺. Alanine substitutions within a hydrophobic "neck" of the pore, which widen it, cause the channel to be constitutively active, irrespective of Ca²⁺. We conclude that the primary function of the neck is as a "gate" that controls chloride permeation in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner. In contrast to what others have proposed, we find that the neck is not a major contributor to the channel's ion selectivity. We find that mutation of a cytosolic "aperture" of the pore does not perturb the Ca²⁺ dependence of the channel or its preference for anions over cations, but its mutation dramatically alters relative permeabilities among anions. The data suggest that the aperture functions as a size-selective filter that permits the passage of small entities such as partially dehydrated chloride ions while excluding larger molecules such as amino acids. Thus, unlike ion channels that have a single "selectivity filter," in bestrophin, distinct regions of the pore govern anion-vs.-cation selectivity and the relative permeabilities among anions.

Restoration of mutant bestrophin-1 expression, localisation and function in a polarised epithelial cell model

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) is a retinopathy caused by mutations in the bestrophin-1 protein, which is thought to function as a Ca²⁺-gated Cl⁻ channel in the basolateral surface of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). Using a stably transfected polarised epithelial cell model, we show that four ARB mutant bestrophin-1 proteins were mislocalised and subjected to proteasomal degradation. In contrast to the wild-type bestrophin-1, each of the four mutant proteins also failed to conduct Cl⁻ ions in transiently transfected cells as determined by whole-cell patch clamp. We demonstrate that a combination of two clinically approved drugs, bortezomib and 4-phenylbutyrate (4PBA), successfully restored the expression and localisation of all four ARB mutant bestrophin-1 proteins. Importantly, the Cl⁻ conductance function of each of the mutant bestrophin-1 proteins was fully restored to that of wild-type bestrophin-1 by treatment of cells with 4PBA alone. The functional rescue achieved with 4PBA is significant because it suggests that this drug, which is already approved for long-term use in infants and adults, might represent a promising therapy for the treatment of ARB and other bestrophinopathies resulting from missense mutations in BEST1.

Summary: Chemical chaperone 4PBA fully restores Cl⁻ conductance activity for mutant bestrophin-1 proteins associated with inherited retinal dystrophy, autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy.

Clinical and Genetic Findings of Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy in Japanese Cohort

PURPOSE

To report the clinical and genetic findings of 9 Japanese patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB).

DESIGN

Retrospective, multicenter observational case series.

METHODS

Nine ARB patients from 7 unrelated Japanese families that were examined in 3 institutions in Japan were studied. A series of ophthalmic examinations including fundus photography, spectral-domain optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, electrooculography (EOG), electroretinography, and the results of genetic analysis were reviewed.

RESULTS

Genetic analyses identified 7 pathogenic variants in BEST1 including 2 novel variants, c.478G>C (p.A160P) and c.948+1delG. Homozygous variants were found in 4 families and compound heterozygous variants were found in 3 families. Two patients were diagnosed as ARB only after the whole exome sequencing analyses. The Arden ratio of the EOG was less than 1.5 in all 7 patients tested. Vitelliform lesions typical for Best vitelliform macular dystrophy were not seen in any of the patients. Seven patients shared some of the previously described features of ARB: subretinal deposits, extensive subretinal fluid, and cystoid macular edema (CME). However, the other 2 patients with severe retinal degeneration lacked these features. Focal choroidal excavations were present bilaterally in 2 patients. One case had a marked reduction of the CME and expansion of subretinal deposits over an 8-year of follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese ARB patients had some but not all of the previously described features. Genetic analyses are essential to diagnose ARB correctly in consequence of considerable phenotypic variations.

Detailed analysis of family with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with new BEST1 mutation

Purpose

To describe the clinical and genetic findings in a patient with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB) and his healthy parents.

Methods

The patient and his healthy non-consanguineous parents underwent detailed ophthalmic evaluations including electro-oculography (EOG), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging. Mutation analysis of the BEST1 gene was performed by Sanger sequencing.

Results

The FAF images showed multiple spots of increased autofluorescence, and the sites of these spots corresponded to the yellowish deposits detected by ophthalmoscopy. SD-OCT showed cystoid macular changes and a shallow serous macular detachment. The Arden ratio of the EOG was markedly reduced to 1.1 in both eyes. Genetic analysis of the proband detected two sequence variants of the BEST1 gene in the heterozygous state: a novel variant c.717delG, p.V239VfsX2 and an already described c.763C>T, p.R255W variant associated with Best vitelliform macular dystrophy and ARB. The proband’s father carried the c.717delG, p.V239VfsX2 variant in the heterozygous state, and the mother carried the c.763C>T, p.R255W variant in the heterozygous state. The parents who were heterozygous for the BEST1 variants had normal visual acuity, EOG, SD-OCT, and FAF images.

Conclusions

In a truncating BEST1 mutation, the phenotype associated with ARB is most likely due to a marked decrease in the expression of BEST1 promoted by the nonsense-mediated decay surveillance mechanism, and it may depend on the position of the premature termination of the codon created.

New best1 mutations in autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To report the ocular phenotype in patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy and carriers, and to describe novel BEST1 mutations.

METHODS

Patients with clinically suspected and subsequently genetically proven autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy underwent full ophthalmic examination and investigation with fundus autofluorescence imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, electroretinography, and electrooculography. Mutation analysis of the BEST1 gene was performed through direct Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

Five affected patients from four families were identified. Mean age was 16 years (range, 6-42 years). All affected patients presented with reduced visual acuity and bilateral, hyperautofluorescent subretinal yellowish deposits within the posterior pole. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography demonstrated submacular fluid and subretinal vitelliform material in all patients. A cystoid maculopathy was seen in all but one patient. In 1 patient, the location of the vitelliform material was seen to change over a follow-up period of 3 years despite relatively stable vision. Visual acuity and fundus changes were unresponsive to topical and systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and systemic steroids. Carriers had normal ocular examinations including normal fundus autofluorescence. Three novel mutations were detected.

CONCLUSION

Three novel BEST1 mutations are described, suggesting that many deleterious variants in BEST1 resulting in haploinsufficiency are still unknown. Mutations causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy are mostly located outside of the exons that usually harbor vitelliform macular dystrophy-associated dominant mutations.

Biallelic Mutations in the BEST1 Gene: Additional Families with Autosomal Recessive Bestrophinopathy

PURPOSE

To describe the genotype and phenotype of patients with autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB), and heterozygous carriers.

METHODS

The members of three unrelated ARB families were investigated. Molecular genetic analysis was performed on 11 members of these families. Ten members were examined clinically; including visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, biomicroscopy, fundus photography, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Measurements were also made of the anterior chamber depth and axial length, and optical coherence tomography (OCT), electrooculography (EOG), and full-field electroretinography (full-field ERG) were performed. Multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) was performed on eight members of these families.

RESULTS

Two novel combinations of missense mutations in the BEST1 gene were identified: p.R141H/p.M325T in three patients with ARB in two unrelated Norwegian families, and p.R141H/p.I201T was found in an ARB patient in a Swedish family. All four patients with ARB had clinical and electrophysiological features of ARB. All the heterozygous carriers of the p.R141H mutation were clinically normal, and showed normal OCT, EOG and full-field ERG findings, but had mildly abnormal mfERG results. Only one heterozygous carrier of the p.M325T mutation was studied and he was clinically normal, showing normal OCT and full-field ERG results, but subnormal EOG and mfERG findings. The heterozygous carrier of the p.I201T mutation was clinically normal, showing normal OCT, EOG and full-field ERG results, but subnormal mfERG results.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that the two novel combinations of compound heterozygous mutations p.R141H/p.M325T and p.R141H/p.I201T in the BEST1 gene can also lead to the ARB phenotype.

Mutation analysis of BEST1 in Japanese patients with Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical and genetic features of Japanese patients with Best's vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study examined 22 patients, including 16 probands from 16 families with BVMD. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed, including dilated funduscopy, full-field electroretinography (ERG) and electro-oculography (EOG). BEST1 mutation analysis was performed by Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

All 16 probands exhibited characteristic BVMD fundus appearances, abnormal EOG, and normal ERG responses with the exception of one diabetic retinopathy proband. Genetic analysis identified 12 BEST1 variants in 13 probands (81%). Of these, 10 variants (p.T2A, p.R25W, p.F80L, p.V81M, p.A195V, p.R218H, p.G222E, p.V242M, p.D304del and p.E306D) have been previously reported in BVMD, while two variants (p.S7N and p.P346H) were novel, putative disease-causing variants. Single BEST1 variants were found in 12 probands. The one proband with compound heterozygous variants (p.S7N and p.R218H) exhibited typical BVMD phenotypes (pseudohypopyon stage and vitelliruptive stage in the right and left eyes, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Twelve different variants, two of which (p.S7N and p.P346H) were novel, were identified in the 13 Japanese families with BVMD. Compound heterozygous variants were found in one proband exhibiting a typical BVMD phenotype. Our results suggest that BEST1 variants do play a large role in Japanese patients with BVMD.

Structure and insights into the function of a Ca(2+)-activated Cl(-) channel

Bestrophin calcium-activated chloride channels (CaCCs) regulate the flow of chloride and other monovalent anions across cellular membranes in response to intracellular calcium (Ca(2+)) levels. Mutations in bestrophin 1 (BEST1) cause certain eye diseases. Here we present X-ray structures of chicken BEST1-Fab complexes, at 2.85 Å resolution, with permeant anions and Ca(2+). Representing, to our knowledge, the first structure of a CaCC, the eukaryotic BEST1 channel, which recapitulates CaCC function in liposomes, is formed from a pentameric assembly of subunits. Ca(2+) binds to the channel's large cytosolic region. A single ion pore, approximately 95 Å in length, is located along the central axis and contains at least 15 binding sites for anions. A hydrophobic neck within the pore probably forms the gate. Phenylalanine residues within it may coordinate permeating anions via anion-π interactions. Conformational changes observed near the 'Ca(2+) clasp' hint at the mechanism of Ca(2+)-dependent gating. Disease-causing mutations are prevalent within the gating apparatus.

Autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy associated with angle-closure glaucoma

PURPOSE

Abnormalities in the BEST1 gene have recently been recognised as causing autosomal recessive bestrophinopathy (ARB). ARB has been noted to have a variable phenotypic presentation, distinct from that of autosomal dominant Best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD). Both conditions are associated with deposits in the retina, a reduced or absent electro-oculography (EOG) light rise, and the risk of developing angle-closure glaucoma. Herein, we describe the clinical and genetic characteristics of a young male diagnosed with ARB associated with angle-closure glaucoma resulting from a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1.

METHODS

All research involved in this case adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The proband underwent slitlamp examination, retinal autofluorescence imaging and optical coherence tomography after presenting with deteriorating vision. The findings prompted genetic testing with bi-directional DNA sequencing of coding and flanking intronic regions of BEST1. The proband's family members were subsequently screened.

RESULTS

A provisional diagnosis of ARB was made based on the findings of subretinal and schitic lesions on fundoscopy and retinal imaging, together with abnormal EOG and electroretinography. Genetic testing identified a novel homozygous mutation in BEST1, c.636+1 G>A. Family members were found to carry one copy of the mutation and had no clinical or electrophysiological evidence of disease. The proband was additionally diagnosed with angle-closure glaucoma requiring topical therapy, peripheral iridotomies and phacoemulsification.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenotypic overlap, reduced penetrance, variable expressivity and the ongoing discovery of new forms of bestrophinopathies add to the difficulty in distinguishing these retinal diseases. All patients diagnosed with ARB or BVMD should be examined for narrow angles and glaucoma, given their frequent association with these conditions.