Impact of contact lens materials on multipurpose contact lens solution disinfection activity against Fusarium solani

Polyhexamethylene Biguanide Multipurpose Solutions on Bacterial Disinfection: A Comparison Study of Effectiveness in a Developing Country

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the antimicrobial action of commercially available multipurpose disinfection solutions (MPDS) with and without hydrogel contact lens for disinfection of isolated corneal bacteria.

METHODS

Five commercially available MPDS in Brazil (BioSoak, Clear Lens, OPTI-FREE, Renu, and UltraSept) were tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Staphylococcus aureus , and Staphylococcus epidermidis . All five MPDS were also tested on P. aeruginosa and S. aureus biofilm in a Hioxifilcon A lens.

RESULTS

OPTI-FREE and Renu were effective against all bacterial isolates without contact lenses. BioSoak was effective in inhibiting P. aeruginosa and S. epidermidis but not against S. aureus . UltraSept was effective for inhibiting S. epidermidis and S. aureus but not against P. aeruginosa . Clear Lens was effective in inhibiting only S. epidermidis but not P. aeruginosa and S. aureus . In contact lens bacterial biofilms, OPTI-FREE was the only MPDS to demonstrate significantly higher disinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

MPDS containing dual biocides polyquaternium-1 and myristamidopropyl dimethylamine possess the highest disinfection action against multiple ocular pathogens with and without contact lenses when compared with other MPDS. Current single-action polyhexamethylene biguanide solutions are not entirely effective and should not be recommended.

Susceptibility of Ocular Staphylococcus aureus to Antibiotics and Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions

Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent cause of ocular surface infections worldwide. Of these surface infections, those involving the cornea (microbial keratitis) are most sight-threatening. S. aureus can also cause conjunctivitis and contact lens-related non-infectious corneal infiltrative events (niCIE). The aim of this study was to determine the rates of resistance of S. aureus isolates to antibiotics and disinfecting solutions from these different ocular surface conditions. In total, 63 S. aureus strains from the USA and Australia were evaluated; 14 were from niCIE, 26 from conjunctivitis, and 23 from microbial keratitis (MK). The minimum inhibitory (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBC) of all the strains to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, oxacillin, gentamicin, vancomycin, chloramphenicol, azithromycin, and polymyxin B were determined. The MIC and MBC of the niCIE strains to contact lens multipurpose disinfectant solutions (MPDSs) was determined. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin (100%). The susceptibility to other antibiotics decreased in the following order: gentamicin (98%), chloramphenicol (76%), oxacillin (74%), ciprofloxacin (46%), ceftazidime (11%), azithromycin (8%), and polymyxin B (8%). In total, 87% of all the isolates were multidrug resistant and 17% of the isolates from microbial keratitis were extensively drug resistant. The microbial keratitis strains from Australia were usually susceptible to ciprofloxacin (57% vs. 11%; p = 0.04) and oxacillin (93% vs. 11%; p = 0.02) compared to microbial keratitis isolates from the USA. Microbial keratitis isolates from the USA were less susceptible (55%) to chloramphenicol compared to conjunctivitis strains (95%; p = 0.01). Similarly, 75% of conjunctivitis strains from Australia were susceptible to chloramphenicol compared to 14% of microbial keratitis strains (p = 0.04). Most (93%) strains isolated from contact lens wearers were killed in 100% MPDS, except S. aureus 27. OPTI-FREE PureMoist was the most active MPDS against all strains with 35% of strains having an MIC ≤ 11.36%. There was a significant difference in susceptibility between OPTI-FREE PureMoist and Biotrue (p = 0.02). S. aureus non-infectious CIE strains were more susceptible to antibiotics than conjunctivitis strains and conjunctivitis strains were more susceptible than microbial keratitis strains. Microbial keratitis strains from Australia (isolated between 2006 and 2018) were more susceptible to antibiotics in comparison with microbial keratitis strains from the USA (isolated in 2004). Most of the strains were multidrug-resistant. There was variability in the susceptibility of contact lens isolates to MPDSs with one S. aureus strain, S. aureus 27, isolated from niCIE, in Australia in 1997 being highly resistant to all four MPDSs and three different types of antibiotics. Knowledge of the rates of resistance to antibiotics in different conditions and regions could help guide treatment of these diseases.

The impact of patient behaviour and care system compliance on reusable soft contact lens complications

Reusable soft daily wear contact lenses (CLs) remain popular and were fit to just over half of all wearers in the most recent international CL prescribing survey. Unlike daily disposable CLs, reusables require cleaning and disinfecting after every use, along with storage in a CL case. These additional requirements add a number of steps to the daily wear and care routine, increasing the opportunities for CL wearers to exhibit non-compliant behaviour. The impact of non-compliance ranges from poor lens comfort through to potentially sight-threatening infective keratitis. The coronavirus pandemic has refocused the profession on the importance of hand hygiene in particular, and the need for promoting safe CL wear in general. This review summarises typical non-compliant behaviour related to reusable CLs, and examines strategies and opportunities to better support wearers. Patient education has a central role in encouraging compliant behaviour, although patient recall of information is low, and personal belief systems may result in continuation of non-compliant behaviour despite awareness of the risks. CL care solutions are required for the daily disinfection of lenses, however misuse of multipurpose solutions (MPS) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂)-based care systems can challenge their ability to be fully efficacious. Standard efficacy testing is reviewed, with consideration of how well current protocols model real-world use of CL solutions. Although some recommendations are in place for the inclusion of additional variables such as lens cases, CL materials, organic soil and efficacy against Acanthamoeba, opportunity still exists to reevaluate global standards to ensure consistency of testing in all markets. Finally, potential future innovations are discussed which may further support increased safety in reusable lens wear through novel antimicrobial additions to both CL materials and cases.

In Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy of Silver Lens Cases Used With a Multipurpose Disinfecting Solution

Purpose

We evaluate the in vitro antibacterial activity of silver-copolymerized barrel cases compared to nonsilver barrel cases in combination with a multipurpose disinfecting solution (MPDS).

Methods

The ability of silver and nonsilver cases to reduce the number of adherent Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria was assessed. Additionally, the efficacy of silver cases along with MPDS was investigated in the presence of organic soil and contact lenses. Contact lens cases were challenged with 10⁶ colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of five bacterial species. Adherent bacteria were dislodged from lens cases and surviving organisms enumerated.

Results

Significantly lower numbers of microbes were recovered from silver cases compared to controls, for all bacterial strains (P < 0.005). The combination of silver case along with MPDS showed added efficacy against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria with a maximum reduction of 3.00 ± 0.5 Log₁₀ CFU/mL, compared to the efficacy of silver cases alone (1.97 ± 0.4 Log₁₀ CFU/mL). The addition of organic soil and a contact lens resulted in a significant (P < 0.005) decrease (a maximum of 1.68 ± 0.2 log₁₀ CFU/mL) in disinfection efficacy when MPDS and either silver or control cases were used.

Conclusions

Silver-copolymerized barrel cases work on conjunction with a hypochlorite producing MPDS in the presence of contact lenses and organic soil to reduce microbial contamination of lens cases.

Transitional Relevance

Silver-copolymerized barrel contact lens cases show promising in vitro antibacterial activity against bacterial types commonly implicated in contact lens-related corneal infections. This intervention may limit storage case contamination during use and reduce the frequency of contact lens-related microbial disease.

Antimicrobial Efficacy of Multipurpose Disinfecting Solutions in the Presence of Contact Lenses and Lens Cases

Objective:

The aim of this study was to use antimicrobial efficacy endpoint methodology to determine compatibility of multipurpose disinfecting solutions (MPSs), lens cases, and hydrogel lenses for disinfection (AEEMC) against International Organization for Standardization (ISO)–specified microorganisms and clinical ocular isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Methods:

Six MPSs (PQ/Aldox 1, 2, and 3; PQ/Alexidine; PQ/PHMB; and PHMB) were challenged against ISO-specified microorganisms and S. maltophilia using the AEEMC test. AEEMC tests were performed with and without balafilcon A, etafilcon A, and senofilcon A lenses in lens cases with organic soil. Exposure times included disinfection time (DT) and 24 hr. Additionally, all six MPSs were challenged with two strains of S. maltophilia, based on the ISO Stand-alone test.

Results:

The efficacy against bacteria for PQ/Aldox and PQ/Alexidine MPSs was not diminished by the presence of lenses. The efficacy of PQ/PHMB and PHMB MPSs against Serratia marcescens was significantly reduced compared with the no-lens control at DT for at least one lens type. The PHMB MPS with lenses present also demonstrated reduced efficacy against Staphylococcus aureus at DT versus the control. PQ/Aldox MPSs retained activity against Fusarium solani with lenses present; however, all other test MPSs demonstrated reduced F. solani efficacy at DT with lenses present. With lenses, all MPSs showed reduced efficacy against Candida albicans.

Conclusions:

AEEMC antimicrobial efficacy test results vary based on challenge microorganism, contact lenses, and MPS biocide systems. This study highlights the importance of evaluating MPSs for compatibility with lenses and lens cases.

Consequences of Preservative Uptake and Release by Contact Lenses

OBJECTIVES

To assess contact lens preservative uptake and release from multipurpose solutions (MPS) and subsequent acquisition of lens antibacterial activity.

METHODS

Kinetics of uptake and release of poly (hexamethylene biguanide hydrochloride) (PHMB) or polyquaternium-1 (PQ-1) from various contact lenses were studied initially with the pure compounds and then after soaking in MPS containing these compounds. Lenses soaked in MPS were tested for antibacterial activity.

RESULTS

Only lenses with a negatively charged component absorbed these preservatives. For lenses containing methacrylic acid (MA), uptake of PHMB from preservative-only solution was fast, yet little was released, in contrast to its rapid release from lenses containing other anionic groups. This trend persisted with PHMB-containing MPS. PQ-1 from preservative-only solution was only absorbed by lenses containing MA and was released from MA-containing hydrogels, but not significantly from an MA-containing silicone hydrogel. Lens uptake of PQ-1 was much lower from MPS and release was essentially undetectable from all lenses evaluated. Antibacterial lens activity was acquired by lenses containing MA after an overnight soak in MPS containing PQ-1, and for balafilcon A and omafilcon A after 5 exchanges in PHMB-containing MPS. Acquired activity was maintained during cycling between artificial tear protein solution and MPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Lens preservative uptake and its subsequent release are dependent on lens chemistry, preservative nature, and other MPS components. A few lens/solution combinations acquired antibacterial activity after one or more overnight soaks in MPS, depending on the nature of the anionic lens component and the preservative. Uncharged lenses did not acquire antibacterial activity.

Fungal isolation from disinfectant solutions of contact lens storage cases among asymptomatic users

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence of fungal contamination of store disinfectant solutions contained in contact lens storage cases belonging to asymptomatic contact lens users.

METHODS

Asymptomatic contact lens users were asked to bring their storage cases, lenses included, without having opened the lid of the cup after placing lenses inside. The following information was recorded: age, sex, type of refractive error, contact lens material, schedule of wear, and brand of disinfectant solution. Included subjects had to comply with lens handling, cleaning, and replacement instructions given by the manufacturer or their attending optometrist. One sample per cup of contact lens case was collected using a sterile syringe. Samples were cultured on proper media for 96 hr at 35°C. Fungi were identified to species level by standard methodology.

RESULTS

A total of 216 samples were collected from 117 contact lens storage cases. All participants were using monthly disposable hydrogel lenses on a daily wear basis. Seven fungal species were isolated from 15 specimens (6.9%) collected from 12 storage cases (10.2%). These included one Fusarium solani, four Aspergillus niger, two Aspergillus fumigatus, five Candida parapsilosis, one Candida tropicalis, one Rhodotorula rubra, and one F. solani in combination with Candida guilliermondii. Disinfectant solutions containing hydrogen peroxide were found to be less effective than various alternative solutions in eliminating fungal species.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that even when contact lens users report compliance for handling, cleaning, and replacement according to the manufacturer's instructions, the potential risk of contact lens-related fungal keratitis still remains.

Resistance and growth of Fusarium species in contact lens disinfectant solutions

PURPOSE

To compare the biocidal efficacy of contact lens care solutions against clinical isolates and the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 36031 reference strain of Fusarium species and to determine the ability of the organism to survive and grow in such systems.

METHODS

The ISO 14729 reference method to assess biocidal efficacy was applied to the purified conidial form of 10 strains of Fusarium species. Six multipurpose disinfectant solutions (MPDSs), a one-step hydrogen peroxide (Per-1) system, a hydrogen peroxide-sodium chlorite (Per-2) system, and a one-step povidone iodine (PI) system were compared. Challenge organism viability was determined at various intervals, including the manufacturers' recommended disinfection time for the products (4 to 6 hours) and thereafter to 21 days.

RESULTS

All MPDSs achieved a 3- to 4-log10 reduction in viability of ATCC 36031 within the recommended disinfection time of 6 hours. For the clinical strains, MPDS-1 (PQ-1 + alexidine) and MPDS-2 (PQ-1 + PHMB) produced 3 to 5 log₁₀ kill after 6 hours. Multipurpose disinfectant solution 3 (PQ-1 + Aldox 0.0006%), MPDS-4 (PQ-1 + Aldox 0.0005% + C-9 ED3A), and MPDS-5 (PQ-1 + Aldox 0.0005%) showed reduced efficacy for the same two strains, with 0.6 to 1.7 log₁₀ kill. Multipurpose disinfectant solution 6 (PHMB) gave 1.6 log₁₀ for one strain and 3 to 4 log₁₀ for the remainder. Growth in all the MPDS was not detected up to 21 days incubation. Per-1 showed less than 1 log₁₀ kill at 6 hours for six of 10 strains, including ATCC 36031, and growth (1.2 to 2.7 log₁₀) occurred with three of 10 strains by 7 days. Per-2 gave less than or equal to 0.5 log₁₀ kill after 6- or 24-hour exposure without growth. The PI system showed 4 to 5 log₁₀ kill for all strains tested by the first time point of 4 hours. However, with the exception of ATCC 36031, growth (1.7 to 4.0 log₁₀) occurred with all strains by 7 days in PI.

CONCLUSIONS

All MPDSs were effective against the ATCC 36031 reference strain of Fusarium solani. However, reduced efficacy was found for some MPDSs against the clinical isolates. Unlike MPDSs, peroxide- and povidone iodine-based systems have no continued antimicrobial presence once neutralized, and this can allow growth of surviving Fusarium in the solution. Accordingly, lenses should be subject to fresh disinfection if stored in such solutions for extended periods.