Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 in Chemical Burns

Causes of Corneal Melt After the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I: The Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital Experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term incidence, risk factors, and the management of corneal melt following Boston type I keratoprosthesis (B-KPro I) implantation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational case series. Data were collected regarding demographics, preoperative characteristics, incidence, and outcomes of corneal melt in 102 patients who underwent B-KPro I in the Chinese PLA General Hospital between 2011 and 2018, with a follow-up period ranging from 4 to 11 years.

RESULTS

Chemical burn was the most common indication for B-KPro I (n = 56; 53.8%), followed by ocular trauma (n = 26; 25.0%). During the follow-up period (107 ± 25.7 months), corneal melt occurred in 60 cases among 37 eyes (35.6%), with an incidence of 20.2% at 1 year after surgery. Fourteen cases presented with recurrent corneal melt. Patients with multiple corneal allograft failures had a higher risk of corneal melt. Thermal burns, compared with alkali burns, significantly elevated the odds ratio (OR) of corneal melt (OR, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-24.86; P = 0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal melt significantly reduced the retention time of KPro ( P < 0.01), and its coexistence with other complications further shortened the retention time. A specific pattern of corneal melt occurrence was identified, with a peak incidence at 1 year postoperatively. Our findings suggest variations in the risk of corneal melt among different indications, with thermal burns carrying the highest OR. Moreover, each previous failed keratoplasty doubled the risk of corneal melt after B-KPro I.

Nanohydroxyapatite Coating Attenuates Fibrotic and Immune Responses to Promote Keratoprosthesis Biointegration in Advanced Ocular Surface Disorders

Keratoprosthesis (KPro) implantation is frequently the only recourse for patients with severe corneal disease. However, problems arise due to inadequate biointegration of the KPro, particularly the PMMA optical cylinder, such as tissue detachment, tissue melting, or eye-threatening infection in the interface. Here, using the AuroKPro as a model prosthesis, a surface functionalization approach─coating the optical cylinder with nanohydroxyapatite (nHAp)─was trialed in rabbit eyes with and without a proceeding chemical injury. In chemically injured eyes, which simulated total limbal epithelial stem cell deficiency, clear benefits were conferred by the coating. The total modified Hackett-McDonald score and area of tissue apposition differences 12 weeks after implantation were 5.0 and 22.5%, respectively. Mechanical push-in tests revealed that 31.8% greater work was required to detach the tissues. These differences were less marked in uninjured eyes, which showed total score and tissue apposition differences of 2.5 and 11.5%, respectively, and a work difference of 23.5%. The improved biointegration could be contributed by the attenuated expression of fibronectin (p = 0.036), collagen 3A1 (p = 0.033), and α-smooth muscle actin (p = 0.045)─proteins typically upregulated during nonadherent fibrous capsule envelopment of bioinert material─adjacent to the optical cylinders. The coating also appeared to induce a less immunogenic milieu in the ocular surface tissue, evidenced by the markedly lower expression of tear proteins associated with immune and stimulus responses. Collectively, the level of these tear proteins in eyes with coated prostheses was 1.1 ± 13.0% of naïve eyes: substantially lower than with noncoated KPros (246.5 ± 79.3% of naïve, p = 0.038). Together, our results indicated that nHAp coating may reduce the risk of prosthesis failure in severely injured eyes, which are representative of the cohort of KPro patients.

Regenerative Therapy for Corneal Scarring Disorders

The cornea is a transparent and vitally multifaceted component of the eye, playing a pivotal role in vision and ocular health. It has primary refractive and protective functions. Typical corneal dysfunctions include opacities and deformities that result from injuries, infections, or other medical conditions. These can significantly impair vision. The conventional challenges in managing corneal ailments include the limited regenerative capacity (except corneal epithelium), immune response after donor tissue transplantation, a risk of long-term graft rejection, and the global shortage of transplantable donor materials. This review delves into the intricate composition of the cornea, the landscape of corneal regeneration, and the multifaceted repercussions of scar-related pathologies. It will elucidate the etiology and types of dysfunctions, assess current treatments and their limitations, and explore the potential of regenerative therapy that has emerged in both in vivo and clinical trials. This review will shed light on existing gaps in corneal disorder management and discuss the feasibility and challenges of advancing regenerative therapies for corneal stromal scarring.

[Long-term visual outcomes of Boston type I keratoprosthesis in Canada]

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term visual outcomes of Boston type I keratoprosthesis (KPro) surgery and identify risk factors for visual failure.

METHODS

Single surgeon retrospective cohort study including 85 eyes of 74 patients who underwent KPro implantation to treat severe ocular surface disease, including limbal stem cell deficiency, postinfectious keratitis, aniridia and chemical burns. Procedures were performed at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal from October 2008 to May 2012. All patients with at least 5 years of follow-up were included in the analysis, including eyes with repeated KPro. Main outcome measures were visual acuity (VA), visual failure, defined as a sustained VA worse than the preoperative VA, postoperative complications, and device retention.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 7.2±1.3 years (±SD). Mean VA was 2.1±0.7 (logarithm of minimal angle resolution) preoperatively and 1.9±1.2 at last follow-up. In total, 2.4% of patients had VA better than 20/200 preoperatively vs. 36.5% at last follow-up. Maintenance of improved postoperative VA was seen in 61.8% of eyes at 7 years. Preoperative factors associated with visual failure were known history of glaucoma (HR=2.7 [1.2 to 5.9], P=0.02) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (HR=7.3 [2.5 to 21.4], P<0.01). Cumulative 8-year complication rates were 38.8% retroprosthetic membrane formation, 25.9% hypotony, 23.5% new onset glaucoma, 17.6% retinal detachment, 8.2% device extrusion and 5.9% endophthalmitis. The majority (91.8%) of eyes retained the device 8 years after implantation.

CONCLUSION

Nearly two-thirds of patients exhibited improved VA 7 years after KPro implantation. Preoperative risk factors for visual failure were known glaucoma and Stevens-Johnson syndrome.

Successful use of conjunctival flaps to prolong survival of type I keratoprosthesis in severe bilateral chemical burns: two case reports

INTRODUCTION

This report describes the use of conjunctival flaps to enable the survival of type I keratoprosthesis (KPro) in two cases of bilateral severe total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) following chemical burns.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

Two patients had a history of bilateral chemical injury with lime. On examination, the presenting vision was light perception to hand motions and both cases had conjunctivalized ocular surfaces with symblepharon. A modified technique of type I keratoprosthesis was used, where the conjunctivalized corneal pannus was dissected and lifted off as an inferior fornix-based conjunctival flap. This was followed by a standard surgical technique of type I KPro. The flap was then secured over the device and optical opening was made two weeks later. Both the patients had stable ocular surfaces with visual acuity of 20/20 at 2-7 years of follow-up.

DISCUSSION

In patients with total LSCD with adnexal involvement, type I KPro has unsatisfactory long-term survival because of the risk of repeated epithelial breakdowns and stromal ulceration. With the innovative approach described in this report, type I KPro can be successfully used for sustainable visual improvement in the presence of severe ocular surface disease and symblepharon.

CONCLUSION

Conjunctival flaps can be used along with type I KPros to improve long-term survival and give sustainable visual outcomes in cases of bilateral corneal blindness due to advanced ocular surface damage.

Anatomical and functional outcomes of Boston type I keratoprosthesis as primary penetrating corneal procedure in high-risk and non-high-risk cases

PURPOSE

To analyze the anatomical and functional results of Boston type I keratoprosthesis (B1-KPro) as a primary corneal procedure in high-risk (HR) cases and non-high-risk (NHR) cases.

METHODS

In this retrospective interventional case series, all patients who underwent B1-KPro at a single center between January 2006 and March 2021 were reviewed and identified. Cases were classified according to the primary diagnosis. Anatomical failure was considered in the case of prosthesis extrusion or phthisis bulbi. Functional failure was a postoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) ≥ 1.3 LogMAR (≤ 0.05 decimal) at the end of the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Twenty-three eyes were included for analysis. Thirteen eyes were classified as HR and 10 as NHR. The mean age was 46.5 ± 26.5 years (5-84 years) in the HR group and 49.5 ± 26.9 years (2-78 years) in the NHR group. The mean follow-up was 42.0 ± 35.9 months (1.5-118 months) in HR and 44.8 ± 38.8 months (1-107 months) in NHR. Three eyes in the HR and none in the NHR group showed anatomical failure. Functional failure was reported in 5/13 eyes in the HR and 8/10 in the NHR group. Functional cumulative survival probability was 92% and 82% for the HR group at 1 and 2 years, respectively. In the NHR group, it was 27% at both times. No significant differences were found between groups, except for functional survival in the HR group due to better visual potential of the eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

B1-KPro as a primary corneal procedure is a valid option for visual rehabilitation in high-risk cases.

Severe chemical eye injuries - clinical outcomes and associated socio-economic factors

Aims

To describe clinical outcomes, management, and socio-economic impact of severe acute chemical eye injuries in a tertiary hospital.

Methods

37 patients required emergency admission to the Royal Victoria Infirmary eye ward between April 2013 and September 2015. Demographics, best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), causative agent, degree of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), management and socio-economic data were evaluated.

Results

Mean age on admission was 34.5 years (SD 16.3; range 16-82); 30 males (81.1%); 22 bilateral (59.5%). Causative agent: alkali in 30 cases (81.1%); acid in three cases (8.1%); and unknown in four cases (10.8%). Fifteen cases (40.5%) were assaults, 12 (32.5%) work-related accidents, nine (24.3%) domestic accidents and one (2.7%) undetermined. Eleven patients (29.7%) were unemployed, 18 (48.6%) were labourers, three (8.1%) were students, three (8.1%) were retired and two (5.4%) were professionals. Mean admission time was five days (SD 3.2; range 1-12). Mean follow-up time was 170.5 days (range 1-946). Mean cost of admission was £2478 (range £274-5785). Five patients (13%; seven eyes) developed total or partial limbal stem cell deficiency, all being assaults.

Conclusions

Main causative agent in our study was alkali, with young men in the working age being most frequently involved. Many patients required prolonged hospital admission and costly follow-up. The majority of cases were assaults, mostly occurring in unemployed patients. All the limbal stem cell deficiency cases were due to assaults. We believe that socio-economic factors play an important role in the cause, severity and cost of chemical eye injuries.

Lay Summary

Acute chemical eye injuries have a significant and extensive impact on patients' visual function outcomes and vision-related quality of life, with consequent enormous burden to affected individuals, their families and society. We believe that by understanding the socio-economic environment, we may not only be able to enforce safety measures to tackle the increasing rate of severe chemical eye injuries in our community, but also to develop collaborative programmes with the community, educating the population on the seriousness of chemical eye injuries, and with the local authorities, trying to understand the clustering of assaults in areas and tackling the associated socio-economic risk factors, such as unemployment. Given the increasing rate of assaults using chemicals in recent times, it is also important to assess availability of adequate victim support programmes and develop good interaction with relevant local, regional and national authorities to ensure all aspects of community security service are in place to be able to address any potential deficiencies in line with police and home office guidelines. Keeping in mind that the best action plan is always prevention. However, when an ocular injury does occur it is evident that significant morbidity and visual sequelae can result and affect the socio-economic status of the victims despite our best current medical and surgical care.

Fibrin-Plasma Rich in Growth Factors Membrane for the Treatment of a Rabbit Alkali-Burn Lesion

The purpose of this work is to describe the use of Fibrin-Plasma Rich in Growth Factors (PRGF) membranes for the treatment of a rabbit alkali-burn lesion. For this purpose, an alkali-burn lesion was induced in 15 rabbits. A week later, clinical events were evaluated and rabbits were divided into five treatment groups: rabbits treated with medical treatment, with a fibrin-PRGF membrane cultured with autologous or heterologous rabbit Limbal Epithelial Progenitor Cells (LEPCs), with a fibrin-PRGF membrane in a Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation and with a fibrin-PRGF membrane without cultured LEPCs. After 40 days of follow-up, corneas were subjected to histochemical examination and immunostaining against corneal or conjunctival markers. Seven days after alkali-burn lesion, it was observed that rabbits showed opaque cornea, new blood vessels across the limbus penetrating the cornea and epithelial defects. At the end of the follow-up period, an improvement of the clinical parameters analyzed was observed in transplanted rabbits. However, only rabbits transplanted with cultured LEPCs were positive for corneal markers. Otherwise, rabbits in the other three groups showed positive staining against conjunctival markers. In conclusion, fibrin-PRGF membrane improved the chemically induced lesions. Nonetheless, only fibrin-PRGF membranes cultured with rabbit LEPCs were able to restore the corneal surface.

Surgical Management and Recent Advances in Chemical Injury: A 5-year Review

Purpose: To review the surgical management options in ocular chemical burn, including newer advances.Methods: Online literature search of published articles over last 5 years on surgical management of ocular chemical burn and newer advances were performed on December 30, 2020.Results: Following literature search and screening using adequate filters, 67 review articles on surgical management of ocular chemical burns were retrieved. The review talks about the surgical management options starting from Debridement in acute stage to various visual rehabilitative procedures in the chronic stage. The review also highlights the evolving surgical advances in this field.Conclusion: It is imperative to choose adequate surgical tool wherever applicable; current review discusses the role of each surgical option at different clinical stages in detail.

Long-term outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type I: the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital experience

PURPOSE

To report the long-term outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type I (B-KPro type I) implantation in the management of severe ocular surface disorders.

METHODS

Retrospective case series. Patients who underwent B-KPro type I implantation at the People's Liberation Army General Hospital were enrolled between March 2011 and September 2019. Data regarding visual acuity (VA), B-KPro type I retention and postoperative complications were recorded and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 103 eyes of 100 patients who underwent B-KPro type I implantation were included. The main indications were chemical burn (59.2%), ocular trauma (25.2%), herpetic keratitis (11.7%) and autoimmune diseases (3.9%). The percentage of eyes with postoperative VA of 10/200 or better was 82.7% at 6 months, 82.8% at 12 months, 77.9% at 2 years, 72.4% at 3 years, 71.1% at 4 years, 69.4% at 5 years, 58.9% at 6 years, 56.8% at 7 years and 42.9% at 8 years. Preoperatively, 8.7% eyes were diagnosed with new-onset glaucoma. Retroprosthetic membrane formation occurred in 19.4% eye. Corneal melting occurred in 18.4% eyes. Sterile vitritis was diagnosed in 4.9% eyes and infectious endophthalmitis in 2.9% eyes. Retinal detachment occurred in 0.9% eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a Chinese patient group, B-KPro type I is a viable option for treating severe ocular surface disorders in eyes where conventional keratoplasty would have a poor prognosis, especially in patients with chemical and thermal burns. Improved visual outcomes and high retention rate can be achieved and maintained in most cases.

Long-term outcomes following primary versus secondary Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 implantation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

To compare long-term outcomes of primary versus secondary (postgraft failure) Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 (KPro) implantation.

METHODS

Medical records of patients at the Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal having undergone KPro implantation between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed and included if they had a preoperative Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/100 or worse and a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Eighty-two eyes were separated into two cohorts (40 primary, 42 secondary KPro) and BCVA, complications and device retention were evaluated between groups.

RESULTS

BCVA improved from baseline in both groups at each year; this was significant at all five postoperative years in the primary group and the first 3 years in the secondary group (p<0.05). Mean BCVA was similar between groups at 5 years (logarithm of minimal angle resolution 1.3±0.8 in the primary group vs 1.5±0.8 p<0.05). Idiopathic vitritis, choroidal detachment and new glaucoma occurred more after primary KPro (n=7, 17.5% vs n=1, 2.4%; n=11, 27.5% vs n=3, 7.14% and n=14, 35% vs n=6, 14%, respectively; p<0.05). Primary KPro had lower retention (n=28, 70% vs n=38, 91%, p<0.05) at final follow-up. There was more aniridia in the primary group (n=19, 48% vs n=6, 14%, p<0.01). Within each group, 50% of removals occurred in aniridic eyes.

CONCLUSION

Primary KPro yielded favourable long-term visual outcomes but had more complications and lower retention rates than secondary KPro, likely explained by preoperative indications. Primary device implantation represents a favourable option for patients for whom grafts are likely to fail.

Outcomes of the Boston type 1 and the Aurolab keratoprosthesis in eyes with limbal stem cell deficiency

PURPOSE

To analyse the outcomes of keratoprosthesis in eyes with limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and to compare the outcomes in two different keratoprosthesis devices.

METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective comparative case series which included 81 eyes of patients with severe bilateral corneal blindness secondary to LSCD. The patients underwent either Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (Boston Kpro, n=44) or Aurolab keratoprosthesis (AuroKpro, n=37) implantation. The primary outcome measures of anatomical retention and functional recovery of 20/200 or better visual acuity at yearly time points until 5 years of follow-up were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The most common indication overall was chemical injury (64.2%). Anatomical retention rates were similar in the Boston Kpro (30/44, 68.2%) and AuroKpro (23/37, 62.2%) groups (p=0.89). Kaplan-Meier survival rates at 5 years of follow-up were greater for the Boston Kpro group with respect to both anatomical retention (58.51%±9% vs 43.8±12%; p=0.23) as well as functional recovery (42.61%±8% vs 35.03±10%; p=0.9); these differences were not statistically significant. Overall, the most common complication was new-onset glaucoma (59%; 48/81). The difference in incidence rate of this complication was not statistically significant among the two groups (p=0.09).

CONCLUSION

Keratoprosthesis is an effective treatment option for patients with corneal blindness secondary to LSCD. In a setting where LSCD is a common cause of corneal blindness, the AuroKpro, when available can be considered an alternative to the Boston Kpro to achieve anatomical and functional success in patients who otherwise would not have access to this device.

Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis: Updated Perspectives

The use of Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (BKPro) has significantly increased worldwide. It is no longer considered a procedure of last resort but a reasonable option for patients with otherwise poor prognosis for a traditional penetrating keratoplasty. BKPro was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1992 for bilateral severe corneal blindness due to multiple corneal transplant failure. Over the years, indications have extended beyond recurrent immunologic rejection to include other conditions such as chemical injury and other causes of bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency, extensive corneal neovascularization, neurotrophic corneas and hypotony, among others. Numerous advances in the design of the BKPro, improvement of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative management have resulted in favorable outcomes and a reduction in postoperative complications. Accordingly, many studies have shown that implantation of this device is highly effective in restoring vision with very good short-term outcomes. However, due to the lifetime risk of sight-threatening complications after BKPro implantation, a longer follow-up period should provide outcomes that are more realistic. In this review, the authors examined only the results of publications with an average of at least 2 years of follow-up. The overall intermediate to long-term visual outcomes and retention rate in BKPro seem to be favorable. However, autoimmune diseases and cicatrizing conditions continue to show a higher incidence of postoperative complications that require further management.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis

PURPOSE

The Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis (KPro), used in patients with high risk of corneal graft failure, is increasingly being used. However, the medium- to long-term outcomes are currently unclear. We analyzed the medium- (2-5 years) and long-term (>5 years) efficacy and safety of the Boston type 1 KPro in terms of visual outcomes, device retention, and postoperative complications.

METHODS

We last searched electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) on March 31, 2018. Visual outcomes and device retention at 2 and 5 years, alongside postoperative complications, were primary outcome measures.

RESULTS

We identified 407 articles. Thirty studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The combined proportion of eyes with ≥6/60 vision was 62% at 2 years and 51% at 5 years. The combined retention rate was 88% at 2 years and 74% at 5 years. Retroprosthetic membrane (36.6%) and glaucoma (39.3%) were found to be the most common long-term complications. Very few studies showed visual outcomes or retention rates at 5 years, with results sparse and collectively not meaningful because of small patient numbers and ambiguous reporting of follow-up times.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2-year results indicate that there is a place for the Boston type 1 KPro in the management of corneal blindness. However, there is scarce evidence regarding its medium- and long-term efficacy and safety. The high rate of reported complications necessitates strict patient selection and stringent follow-up.

Telemetric Intraocular Pressure Monitoring after Boston Keratoprosthesis Surgery Using the Eyemate-IO Sensor: Dynamics in the First Year

PURPOSE

To analyze the dynamics of telemetrically measured intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first year after implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis type I (BI-KPro) cornea and to compare agreement of telemetric IOP measurements with finger palpations.

DESIGN

Prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial.

METHODS

In the ARGOS (NCT02945176) study, 12 individuals underwent implantation of an Eyemate-IO intraocular system. Follow-up after surgery took place 12 months later with 13 visits planned per patient. During BI-KPro surgery, an electromagnetic induction sensor ring enabling telemetric IOP data transfer to a hand-held reading device outside the eye was implanted into the ciliary sulcus with or without trans-scleral suture fixation. Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and IOP assessments through the telemetric system were compared to IOP assessed by finger palpation by 2 experts.

RESULTS

Preoperative IOP measured by Goldmann tonometry was 13.4 ± 6.2 mm Hg. Telemetric IOP peaked at 23.1 ± 16.5 mm Hg at the first postoperative day. On day 5, mean IOP was 16.0 ± 5.2 mm Hg and 20.95 ± 6.5 mm Hg after 6-12 months. IOP estimation by finger palpation was grouped in 4 categories: normal, A; soft/hypotonic, B; borderline, C; and hypertonic, D. Mean telemetric IOP was 18.2 ± 6.1 mm Hg in category A, 8.9 ± 2.8 mm Hg in B, 22.4 ± 4.9 mm Hg in C, and 34.3 ± 11.0 mm Hg in D. Differences in mean telemetric IOPs per category were statistically significant (P < .001). Daily IOP fluctuations and peaks could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Telemetric IOP assessment seems to be able to identify postoperative IOP peaks and a longitudinal increase of IOP after BI-KPro surgery. IOP measurements using the telemetric Eyemate-IO sensor showed a satisfactory agreement with those of finger palpations by 2 experts.

The Aurolab Keratoprosthesis (KPro) versus the Boston Type I Kpro: 5-year Clinical Outcomes in 134 Cases of Bilateral Corneal Blindness

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of Boston Type I keratoprosthesis (Boston Kpro) with its low-cost version, the Aurolab Kpro (auroKPro).

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative case series.

METHODS

This study included 134 eyes of 130 patients with severe bilateral corneal blindness but with wet ocular surfaces. The patients underwent either Boston Kpro (n = 78) or auroKPro (n = 56) implantation based on the device availability and patient's affordability. The primary outcome measurements were anatomical retention (defined as absence of device extrusion, exchange, or explantation) and functional recovery of 20/200 or better visual acuity at yearly time points until 5-years of follow-up.

RESULTS

Limbal stem cell deficiency was the most common indication (60.5%) for surgery, followed by multiple failed grafts (35%). Both groups were comparable at baseline with respect to indications for surgery and associated ocular co-morbidities (P > 0.05). The overall anatomical retention rates were similar in the Boston Kpro (55 of 78, 70.5%) and auroKPro (35 of 56, 62.5%) groups (P = 0.11). Kaplan-Meier survival rates at 5 years of follow-up were greater for the Boston Kpro with respect to both anatomical retention (63 ± 6% vs. 43.4 ± 10%, respectively; P = 0.057) and functional recovery (42.4 ± 6% vs. 32.2 ± 7%, respectively; P = 0.345), but these differences were not statistically significant. Complications such as intraoperative device breakage (7%) and postoperative extrusions (12.5%) were significantly more common with the auroKPro (P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the auroKPro and the Boston Kpro are effective treatment options for patients with severe bilateral corneal blindness. The auroKPro can be considered an alternative to the Boston Kpro when affordability or availability of the Boston Kpro is a limiting factor.

Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 for limbal stem cell deficiency after severe chemical corneal injury: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the published literature on outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type 1 for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency secondary to severe chemical corneal injury.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register. The main outcome measures assessed were the proportion of eyes with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 20/200 and the proportion retaining their original keratoprosthesis, both at the last recorded visit.

RESULTS

We identified 9 reports in which outcomes of Boston keratoprosthesis type I implantation after severe chemical injury could be determined, encompassing a total of 106 eyes of 100 patients. There were no randomized controlled studies. The median pre-operative BCVA was hand motion. Vision improved to ≥20/200 in 99/106 (93.4%) eyes after implantation. With a mean follow-up of 24.99 ± 14 months, 68/106 (64.1%) eyes retained BCVA ≥ 20/200 at the last examination. Therefore, 68/99 (68.7%) of those who improved to > 20/200 maintained at least this acuity. The originally implanted device was retained in 88/99 (88.9%) recipients for whom retention was reported. The mean time to failure was 22.36 ± 17.2 months. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy was the most common cause for BCVA <20/200 in eyes that retained the keratoprosthesis (18/27, 66.7%)..

CONCLUSIONS

Implantation of a Boston keratoprosthesis type I in eyes with corneal blindness after severe chemical ocular injury leads to functional vision in the majority of recipients. Evidence was limited by variability in outcome reporting and an absence of controlled studies..

Keratolimbal allograft for limbal stem cell deficiency after severe corneal chemical injury: a systematic review

Purpose

To review the published literature on outcomes of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) for the surgical treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) and corneal blindness after severe corneal chemical injury.

Methods

Literature searches were conducted in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, CINAHL, LILACS and the Cochrane Library. Standard systematic review methodology was applied. The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/200 at last follow-up. Other measures of allograft success were also collected.

Results

We identified six reports in which KLAL outcomes in the eyes after chemical injury could be distinguished. There were no randomised controlled studies. The outcomes of KLAL in 36 eyes of 33 patients were analysed. One study with seven eyes did not specify KLAL follow-up specific to chemical injury. Median postoperative follow-up for the other 29 eyes in 26 patients was 42 months (range 6.2–114 months). In the same 29 eyes, 69% (20/29) had BCVA ≥20/200 at the last follow-up examination. Eighty-nine per cent of all eyes (32/36) underwent penetrating keratoplasty simultaneous or subsequent to KLAL.

Conclusions

The number of studies where outcomes of KLAL in eyes with severe corneal chemical injury could be discerned was limited, and variability was observed in outcome reporting. The quality of evidence to support the use of KLAL in LSCD in severe chemical corneal burns was low. Standardisation and longer follow-up are needed to better define evidence-based best practice when contemplating surgical intervention for blindness after corneal chemical injury.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42017054733.