Predictors of Early Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

Topical Ocular TRPV1 Antagonist SAF312 (Libvatrep) for Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of topical ocular SAF312 (Libvatrep) in post-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain.

Methods

In this placebo (vehicle)-controlled, participant- and investigator-masked study, 40 participants were randomized (1:1) to two treatment sequences in a bilateral PRK crossover design (SAF312 2.5% followed by vehicle [or vice versa], one eye drop, four times daily for 72 hours after PRK). Primary endpoints were visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 6 hours after first drop of study drug and average VAS scores over 0 to 12 hours postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included postoperative oral rescue medication (ORM) use and adverse events (AEs).

Results

All 40 participants completed the study. Both primary endpoints were met; mean difference in VAS pain scores between SAF312- and vehicle-treated eyes was -11.13 (P = 0.005, -25%) at 6 hours postoperatively and -8.56 (P = 0.017, -22%) over 0 to 12 hours. Mean VAS pain scores with SAF312 were consistently lower than with vehicle from 1 hour postoperatively up to 30 hours (P ≤ 0.10 observed in 8/11 time points). Less ORM was taken with SAF312 up to 0 to 72 hours postoperatively, with a trend of fewer participants taking ORM at 0 to 24 hours postoperatively with SAF312 versus vehicle. No serious AEs were reported. All ocular AEs were mild and transient, and none were drug related. SAF312-treated eyes showed no delay in wound healing and had a lower grade 4 conjunctival hyperemia 24 hours postoperatively versus vehicle-treated eyes.

Conclusions

SAF312 was well tolerated and effective in reducing ocular pain post-PRK.

Translational Relevance

Topical SAF312 presents a new therapeutic option for patients undergoing PRK.

Management of Pain after Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate current best practices for postoperative photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain control.

METHODS

Literature searches in the PubMed database were last conducted in October 2021 and were restricted to publications in English. This search identified 219 citations, of which 84 were reviewed in full text for their relevance to the scope of this assessment. Fifty-one articles met the criteria for inclusion; 16 studies were rated level I, 33 studies were rated level II, and 2 studies were rated level III.

RESULTS

Systemic opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); topical NSAIDs; postoperative cold patches; bandage soft contact lenses (BCLs), notably senofilcon A contact lenses; and topical anesthetics were demonstrated to offer significantly better pain control than comparison treatments. Some other commonly reported pain mitigation interventions such as systemic gabapentinoids, chilled intraoperative balanced salt solution (BSS) irrigation, cycloplegia, and specific surface ablation technique strategies offered limited improvement in pain control over control treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic NSAIDs and opioid medications, topical NSAIDs, cold patches, BCLs, and topical anesthetics have been shown to provide improved pain control over alternative strategies and allow PRK-associated pain to be more tolerable for patients.

Preoperative Predictors for Acute Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify preoperative predictors for the occurrence of early severe postoperative pain in patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The implementation of preoperative screening methods may facilitate more specific or aggressive pain therapies specifically targeted to individuals at a high risk of experiencing severe postoperative pain.

METHODS

This was exploratory research that included patients who underwent PRK. Before PRK, patients were administered a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and underwent corneal sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) tests. Post-PRK pain was assessed using a pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS), and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) was completed 21 days before PRK and 1, 24, 48, and 72 hours after PRK. Spearman correlations were calculated for pain scores and preoperative predictors.

RESULTS

This research included 34 eyes of 34 patients. Preoperative corneal sensitivity was positively correlated with post-PRK pain scores as assessed by VAS and SF-MPQ (rho = 0.39 and rho = 0.41, respectively, P < 0.05). No correlations were found between Pain Catastrophizing Scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and CPM scores and post-PRK pain scores (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal presurgical corneal sensitivity was a protective marker for severe pain after PRK, while scores as assessed by VAS and SF-MPQ and CPM were not related to postoperative pain.

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked Controlled Clinical Trial of Postoperative Pain after Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (Trans-PRK)

Objective. To determine the effect of aqua astricta flushing on ocular pain after Trans-PRK. Method. Three hundred and seventy eyes from 185 myopic patients were prospectively recruited for the study. Patients underwent Trans-PRK in both eyes. Postsurgically, one eye from each patient was randomly assigned to the trial group, and refrigerated normal saline was used to rinse the eye. The contralateral eye was assigned to the control group, and room temperature normal saline was used to rinse the eye. The primary target was postoperative pain experienced at the end of surgery and on the first, second, and third days after surgery. Secondary targets were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE), and haze. Results. Patient pain scores gradually decreased over time, and the difference between time points of all patients was statistically significant ( $P<0.05$ ). Postoperative pain was not affected by patient cooperation, education level, refractive SE, optical zone, corneal bed, or cutting depth ( $P>0.05$ ). The level of pain at the end of surgery was affected by intraoperative rinsing. The pain level of the aqua astricta group was lower than the normal temperature saline group, and the difference was statistically significant ( $P<0.01$ ). Pain scores on the first, second, and third days after surgery were not affected by intraoperative rinse ( $P>0.05$ ). Conclusion. Trans-PRK is an important means of corneal refractive surgery, but postoperative pain remains unavoidable. These findings suggest that the use of cooled fluid during surgery reduces postoperative pain at the end of surgery.

Update on Pain Management After Advanced Surface Ablation

PURPOSE

To provide an update for postoperative pain control strategies to help ophthalmic surgeons establish a more effective management plan for patients who underwent advanced surface ablation surgeries.

METHODS

Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and PubMed were the main resources used to search the medical literature.

RESULTS

The postoperative cornea's healing process is accompanied by intense pain as the chief complaint in the first days after the operation. Several strategies were developed to relieve postoperative pain after surface ablation procedures. These strategies included different preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative methods. Considering the preoperative demographic and emotional factors, underlying dry eye, alternative epithelial removal techniques, bandage contact lenses, and topical or oral therapeutic agents are some examples of postoperative pain treatments after surface ablation procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

The current review revealed that despite the development of numerous protocols to relieve postoperative pain following surface ablations, the best approach could be a combination of different strategies. In practice, no validated and standardized strategy is available for total elimination of postoperative pain following advanced surface ablation surgeries. [J Refract Surg. 2021;37(11):782-790.].

Assessment of Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain After Photorefractive Keratectomy

PURPOSE

To define the factors that affect patient's self-assessed postoperative pain after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

METHODS

Patients who underwent PRK in 2016 were evaluated. Anonymized data collected included patient gender, age, and season at the time of surgery, ablation depth, surgeon status (attending vs. resident), topical tetracaine use, and subjective pain scores at postoperative days (PODs) 1 and 7. Average pain scores and amount of pain medication taken were analyzed for each of the previously mentioned variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 231 patients who underwent PRK were analyzed. The mean pain score and SD were 0.78 ± 1.87 on POD 1 and 0.03 ± 0.37 by POD 7. Patients who used topical tetracaine reported significantly higher pain on POD 1 and 7 compared with patients who did not use tetracaine (P < 0.001 and P = 0.038, respectively). No significant differences in pain scores were seen based on surgeon status, ablation depth, gender, and season. Patients who used topical tetracaine took a higher amount of oral pain medication (9.44 ± 6.01) compared with those who did not (7.02 ± 4.71) (P = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative pain was significantly elevated in patients who used tetracaine on POD 1 and POD 7. These patients were also more likely to take oral pain medication than those who did not use topical tetracaine. Surgeon status, season, gender, and ablation depth showed no significant differences in subjective pain scores. Oral pain medication should be evaluated to assess efficacy and safety in inhibiting ocular pain after PRK.

The Association between Preoperative Dry Eye Symptoms and Postoperative Discomfort in Patients Underwent Photorefractive Keratectomy

Purpose

To investigate the association between preoperative dry eye symptoms on postoperative pain and discomfort after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

Methods

A retrospective case series of 151 consecutive patients, who underwent myopic PRK in both eyes between 5/2016 and 5/2017. Patients with positive dry eye disease (DED) signs on clinical examination or with known DED were excluded. Patients underwent a subjective evaluation for dry eye symptoms using ocular surface disease index (OSDI) and modified standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED) questionnaires. One day postoperatively, the patients were evaluated again by a questionnaire of pain, discomfort, photophobia, foreign body sensation, satisfaction with vision, and frequency of usage of anesthetic drops.

Results

Fifty-two patients had any preoperative dry eye symptoms (OSDI score > 0) compared to 99 nonsymptomatic patients (OSDI score of 0). Postoperatively, the symptomatic dry eye patients suffered significantly more pain than the nondry eye patients (p=0.02). Thirteen patients had a cumulated modified SPEED score >4 (moderate to severe) in comparison to 138 patients with score of 0-4 (non to mild). Patients with moderate to severe preoperative symptoms suffered more pain (p=0.006), photophobia (p=0.005), and epiphora (p=0.03). No statistically significant difference was seen in postoperative subjective visual quality (p=0.82) between the two groups.

Conclusion

Preoperative dry eye symptoms may be associated with postoperative pain, epiphora, and photophobia and thus influence negatively on patient satisfaction with this procedure.