Epi-Bowman Blunt Keratectomy Versus Diluted EtOH Epithelial Removal in Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Prospective Contralateral Eye Study

Cationic nanoemulsion vs. 0.15% sodium hyaluronate artificial tears in the healing process following modern surface keratorefractive surgery

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of artificial tears containing either cationic nanoemulsion (CCN) or sodium hyaluronate artificial tears (SH) on early postoperative healing after modern surface refractive surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, double-masked, parallel-group (1:1), comparative study, 129 patients (n = 255 eyes) were randomized to receive CCN (n = 128) or SH (n = 127) as an adjuvant treatment after either transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (transPRK) or Epi-Bowman keratectomy (EBK). The patients' perspectives were gathered using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, and uncorrected (UCVA), and corrected (BCVA) visual acuity were assessed before and one week and one month after the procedure. In addition, corneal epithelization and subjective assessment of visual blur and eye irritation on drop instillation were assessed at one week postoperatively.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between two groups in age, spherical equivalent refractive error, UCVA, BCVA or OSDI scores before the procedure. There was also no difference between groups in UCVA one week and one month after the procedure. However, statistically significantly lower OSDI scores were found one week and one month after the procedure in the CCN group. Moreover, blurred vision after use of the eye drops was observed less frequently in the CCN group than in the SH group.

CONCLUSIONS

The CCN and SH groups had similar postoperative UCVA. However the significantly lower OSDI scores and less frequently blurred vision after application of the eye drops in the CCN group suggest better subjective outcomes in this group.

Decision taking in corneal refractive surgery

A 27-year-old woman who wants to get rid of contact lenses and spectacles was seen at our clinic. She had strabismus surgery as a child and was patched for the right eye but now shows mild nondisturbing exophoria. Infrequently, she likes to box in the sports school. Her corrected distance visual acuity at presentation in the right eye was 20/16 with -3.75 -0.75 × 50 and in the left eye 20/16 with -3.75 -1.25 × 142. Her cycloplegic refraction in the right eye was -3.75 -0.75 × 44 and in the left eye was -3.25 -1.25 × 147. The left eye is the dominant eye. The tear break-up time was 8 seconds in both eyes, and the Schirmer tear test was 7 to 10 mm in right and left eyes, respectively. Pupil sizes under mesopic conditions were 6.62 mm and 6.68 mm. The anterior chamber depth (ACD) (measured from the epithelium) in the right eye was 3.89 mm and in the left eye was 3.87 mm. The corneal thickness was 503 μm and 493 μm of the right and left eye, respectively. Corneal endothelial cell density was on average 2700 cells/mm2 for both eyes. Slitlamp biomicroscopy showed clear corneas and a normal flat iris configuration. Supplemental Figures 1 to 4 (available at http://links.lww.com/JRS/A818, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A819, http://links.lww.com/JRS/A820, and http://links.lww.com/JRS/A821) show the corneal topography and Belin-Ambrósio deviation (BAD) maps at presentation of the right eye and left eye, respectively. Would you consider this patient a candidate for corneal refractive surgery (eg, laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy, laser in situ keratomileusis [LASIK], or small-incision lenticule extraction [SMILE] procedure)? Has your opinion changed given the recent opinion of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding LASIK?1 The patient herself is slightly favoring an implantation of a phakic intraocular lens (pIOL), as she prefers something reversible. Would you implant a pIOL, and which type of IOL, for this level of myopia? What is your diagnosis or are additional diagnostic methodologies needed to establish a diagnosis? What is your treatment advice for this patient? REFERENCES 1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) lasers-patient labeling recommendations; draft guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff; availability. July 28, 2022, Federal Register; 87 FR 45334. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/laser-assisted-situ-keratomileusis-lasik-lasers-patient-labeling-recommendations Accessed January 25, 2023.

Excimer laser-assisted corneal epithelial pattern ablation for corneal cross-linking

Purpose

To determine corneal cross‐linking (CXL) efficacy and chromophore penetration after excimer laser‐assisted patterned de‐epithelialization.

Methods

Two‐hundred‐twenty porcine eyes were de‐epithelialized ex vivo, either fully (mechanical; n = 88) or patterned (excimer laser; n = 132). Consecutively, corneas were impregnated with hypo‐ or hyperosmolar riboflavin (RF; n = 20, RF‐D; n = 40, respectively) or water‐soluble taurine (WST11; n = 40, and WST‐D; n = 40, respectively), or kept unimpregnated (n = 80). Sixty corneas were subsequently irradiated, inducing CXL, with paired contralateral eyes serving as controls. Outcome measurements included strip extensiometry to assess CXL efficacy, and spectrophotometry and fluorescence microscopy to determine stromal chromophore penetration.

Results

All tested chromophores induced significant CXL (p < 0.001), ranging from 7.6% to 14.6%, with similar stiffening for all formulations (p = 0.60) and both de‐epithelialization methods (p = 0.56). Light transmittance was significantly lower (p < 0.001) after full compared with patterned de‐epithelialization. Stromal chromophore penetration was comparable between fully and patterned de‐epithelialized samples, with full penetration in RD and RF‐D samples and penetration depths measuring 591.7 ± 42.8 µm and 592.9 ± 63.5 µm for WST11 (p = 0.963) and 504.2 ± 43.2 µm and 488.8 ± 93.1 µm for WST‐D (p = 0.669), respectively.

Conclusions

Excimer laser‐assisted patterned de‐epithelialization allows for effective CXL. Stromal chromophore concentration is, however, reduced, which may have safety implications given the need for sufficient UVA attenuation in RF/UVA CXL. The different safety profile of near‐infrared (NIR) may allow safe WST11/NIR CXL even with reduced stromal chromophore concentration values. In vivo studies are needed to evaluate the benefits and further assess safety of excimer laser‐assisted patterned de‐epithelialization for corneal CXL.

Keratoconus concordance in monozygotic twins before and after combined CXL/PRK (Athens Protocol) using Scheimflung and OCT tomography

PUPOSE

To describe the concordance of keratoconus expression in two pairs of monozygotic twins before and after a combined CXL/PRK procedure.

SETTING

Private Ambulatory Eye Surgery Unit.

DESIGN

Retrospective Interventional Twin Study.

METHODS

Two pairs of male monozygotic twins with keratoconus (KCN) were studied retrospectively. Improvement of flattest (k1) and steepest (k2) keratometry, Index of Height Decentration (IHD), corneal thickness at thinnest point and corneal epithelial thickness measured by AS-OCT and Scheimpflug tomography was compared between respective eyes of monozygotic twin siblings 1 to 5 years after the application of combined corneal cross linking (CXL) and topography guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) of part of the refractive error (the Athens Protocol).

RESULTS

Significant improvement was noted in all the keratometric indices of all 8 eyes after the combined CXL/PRK procedure.The difference in k1, k2, IHD corneal thickness at thinnest point and corneal epithelial thickness percentage improvement between the right eyes of each pair of twins was statistically significant 1 and 5 years post-operatively (P < .05). Statistically significant discordance in the aforementioned parameters percentage improvement was likewise observed between the left eyes of each pair of twins (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although a genetic predisposition in KCN is well documented, the discordance in keratometric indices improvement after a CXL/PRK procedure between respective eyes of monozygotic twins suggests that environmental influences may contribute to the disease expression as well. Variable degree of synergy in a combined CXL/PRK procedure may also explain the aforementioned discordant improvement.

Topical use of alcohol in ophthalmology - Diagnostic and therapeutic indications

Alcohol (ethanol) has been used in medicine since time immemorial. In ophthalmic practice, besides as an antiseptic, it was given as retrobulbar injections to relieve severe ocular pain. Alcohol can be applied topically to the surface of neoplastic or suspicious lesions to kill cells that might desquamate and seed during surgical excision, to treat epithelial ingrowth that can occur following corneal surgeries, particularly laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and to treat superficial infectious keratitis. In view of its ability to achieve a smooth cleavage plane between the epithelium and the Bowman's layer, alcohol-assisted delamination (ALD) of the corneal epithelium has been used widely and effectively for a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic indications, at times delivering both outcomes. Diagnostically, ALD yields an intact epithelial sheet which can be fixed flat to provide excellent orientation for histopathological evaluation. Therapeutically, it is most commonly used to treat recurrent corneal erosion syndrome, where its efficacy is comparable to that of phototherapeutic keratectomy but with several advantages. It has also been used to treat various forms of epithelial/anterior stromal dystrophies, which can obviate or delay the need for corneal transplantation for several years. In addition, ALD is performed in corneal collagen cross-linking and corneal refractive surgery for relatively atraumatic removal of the epithelium. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the diagnostic and therapeutic use of topical alcohol in ophthalmology, to describe the surgical and fixation techniques of ALD, and to highlight our experience in ALD over the past decade.

Epi-Bowman keratectomy versus alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy: wound healing and complications

Purpose

In Epi-Bowman Keratectomy™ (EBK), a new dynamic multi-blade single-use device (Epi-Clear™, Orca Surgical, Israel) is utilized to remove the epithelium by sweeping movements across the corneal surface. Epithelial cells are discarded. Alcohol or other chemical agents are not utilized. We wanted to compare clinical results of Epi-Clear photorefractive kertectomy (PRK) to alcohol-assisted PRK.

Study design

Retrospective, comparative study.

Methods

Consecutive case series: Adult patients seeking laser vision correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism without ocular diseases or prior surgery were included. The Epi-Clear PRK group comprised 50 consecutive eyes of 27 patients and the PRK group 50 eyes of 25 patients.

Results

No intraoperative complications occurred. Epi-Clear PRK: At day 1, day 4, and 3 months, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.41/0.47/0.93 (decimal scale); epithelial defect diameter was 4.7/0.2/0 (mm); pain level was 3.8/0.3/0 (visual analogue scale, 0-10), respectively. At 3 months, efficacy index was 0.86 and spherical aberrations were unchanged. Three eyes (6%) showed (presumably sterile) infiltrates. PRK: At day 1, day 4, and 3 months, UDVA was 0.56/0.46/1.15; epithelial defect diameter was 6.3/0.2/0 (mm); pain level was 5.0/0.3/0, respectively. At 3 months, efficacy index was 1.1 and spherical aberrations were unchanged.

Conclusion

The new method of epithelial debridement with Epi-Clear before laser ablation seems to offer fast epithelial removal without nicking Bowman's layer (as observed with the laser microscope). However, we found significantly inferior results of Epi-Clear PRK compared to alcohol-assisted PRK. Furthermore, after Epi-Clear PRK corneal infiltrates as a new type of postoperative complication were observed.