Comparison of descemet-on versus descemet-off deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

Incidence and management of early postoperative complications in lamellar corneal transplantation

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of the incidence, risk factors, and management of early complications after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), Descemet stripping automated keratoplasty (DSAEK), and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

A literature review of complications, that can occur from the time of the transplant up to 1 month after the transplant procedure, was conducted. Case reports and case series were included in the review.

RESULTS

Complications in the earliest postoperative days following anterior and posterior lamellar keratoplasty have shown to affect graft survival. These complications include, but are not limited to, double anterior chamber, sclerokeratitis endothelial graft detachment, acute glaucoma, fluid misdirection syndrome, donor-transmitted and recurrent infection, and Uretts-Zavalia syndrome.

CONCLUSION

It is essential for surgeons and clinicians to not only be aware of these complications but also know how to manage them to minimize their impact on long-term transplant survival and visual outcomes.

Appropriate stage of Descemet membrane removal during donor preparation in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To investigate the appropriate surgical stage for Descemet membrane (DM) removal during donor preparation in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK).

METHODS

This study included 83 corneoscleral buttons that were used for DALK. The donor DM was removed randomly either before (group 1; 43 eyes) or after (group 2; 40 eyes) trephination. The time required for DM removal was recorded, and the geometric properties of cut buttons were evaluated after trephination. The intraoperative video recordings were reviewed to determine if the dissections were performed at the stroma-DM plane as it was intended. The time needed to remove the DM, the rate of correct dissection at the intended stroma-DM plane, and the roundness and precision of the donor cuts were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in donor characteristics, including age, quality of the tissue, and trephination size. Time spent to remove DM was significantly shorter in group 1 (68.9 ± 48.2 s) than group 2 (117.7 ± 52.7 s, P = 0.001). DM stripping was performed incorrectly in 2 corneas (4.7%) in group 1 and in 12 corneas (30%) in group 2 (P = 0.01). No difference was found between the groups in the roundness and precision of donor button cuts.

CONCLUSIONS

DM removal before trephination did not detrimentally affect the geometric properties of punched donor tissues. When DM stripping was performed before trephination, the donor tissue was less traumatized and posterior graft surface was more likely to be regular; therefore, it is advisable to remove DM before trephination during donor preparation for DALK.

Femtosecond laser-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in phototherapeutic keratectomy versus the big-bubble technique in keratoconus

AIM

To compare the functional and anatomic results of femtosecond laser (FSL)-assisted deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) associated with phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) and FSL-assisted DALK performed using the big-bubble technique in keratoconus.

METHODS

During the first phase of the study, an electron microscopy histopathology pilot study was conducted that included four unsuitable donor corneas divided into two groups: in FSL group, FSL lamellar cuts were performed on two corneas and in FSL+PTK group, PTK was performed at the stromal beds of two corneas after FSL lamellar cuts were made. During the second phase of the study, a randomized clinical trial was conducted that included two treatment groups of patients with keratoconus: group 1 (n=14 eyes) underwent FSL-assisted DALK associated with PTK and group 2 (n=12 eyes) underwent FSL-assisted DALK associated with the big-bubble technique. The main outcome measures were the postoperative visual acuity (VA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements, confocal microscopic findings, and contrast sensitivity.

RESULTS

In the pilot study, histopathology showed a more regular stromal bed in the FSL+PTK group. In the clinical trial, group 1 had significantly worse best spectacle-corrected VA and contrast sensitivity (P<0.05 for both comparisons). The residual stromal bed measured by OCT was significantly (P<0.05) thicker in group 1. Confocal microscopy detected opacities only at the donor-receptor interface in group 1.

CONCLUSION

Patients with keratoconus treated with FSL-assisted DALK performed using the big-bubble technique fare better than treated with FSL-assisted DALK associated with PTK.

Comparison of Descemet-On Versus Descemet-Off Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty in Keratoconus Patients: A Randomized Trial

PURPOSE

To compare the visual outcomes of Descemet membrane (DM)-on and DM-off after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using the big-bubble (BB) technique in keratoconus patients.

METHODS

In this prospective trial, keratoconic eyes undergoing DALK procedures with the BB technique were randomized into 2 groups: a donor cornea without DM (group 1; 29 eyes) or with DM (group 2; 30 eyes). These groups were compared with respect to best-corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity while wearing gas permeable contact lenses and also endothelial cell counts.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to best-corrected visual acuity and contrast sensitivity using gas permeable contact lenses as well as endothelial cell counts at 3, 6, and 12 months. After 1 year, the mean (±SD) postoperative visual acuity CL (with contact lenses) was 0.05 (±0.01) in the DM-off group and 0.05 (±0.01) in the DM-on group (P = 0.956). Mean postoperative endothelial cell counts were 2425.0 (±123.7) and 2306.7 (79.9), respectively (P = 0.443), and corneal thicknesses were 527.9 (58.3) and 556.6 (47.3), respectively (P = 0.150). During the follow-up period, very few complications occurred and neither group had a predominance of adverse events at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, DALK procedures using the BB technique for keratoconus with DM-on or DM-off presented no significant differences regarding the visual outcomes or endothelial cell counts.

A year of cornea in review: 2013

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to provide an update of significant corneal literature published in 2013.

DESIGN

This study is a systematic literature review.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the English-language literature published from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, using the following PubMed search and Medical Subject Headings terms: cornea transplantation, keratoplasty, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty, cross linking, pre-Descemet's layer, Rho-associated kinase, keratoprosthesis, infectious keratitis, corneal dystrophy, corneal astigmatism, and keratoconus.

RESULTS

This review summarizes relevant and innovative original articles, review articles, and novel techniques from the following journals: American Journal of Ophthalmology, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Cornea, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, JAMA Ophthalmology, Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Journal of Refractive Surgery, and Ophthalmology. Case reports, abstracts, letters to the Editor, and unpublished work were excluded, as well as articles e-published ahead of print in 2012 that were discussed in the previous review. One hundred twenty-seven articles met the criteria for this review.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarizes significant cornea-related literature from 2013.

Donor Descemet-off versus Descemet-on deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: a confocal scan study

PURPOSE

To compare confocal features of grafts following deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) using a donor without Descemet membrane (DM) versus a full-thickness donor with intact DM and endothelium.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study examined 45 eyes from patients with keratoconus who underwent DALK using the big-bubble technique. The big-bubble technique yielded a bared DM in all keratoconic eyes. Twenty-seven eyes received tissue from a donor without DM (group 1), while 18 received tissue from a full-thickness donor with an intact DM and endothelium (group 2). A group of normal eyes (n = 28, group 3) served as controls. Confocal microscopy was used to determine keratocyte density, explore the donor-recipient interface including clarity and reflectivity, evaluate endothelial cell density and morphology, as well as measure interface depth and central corneal thickness.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up duration was 20.2 ± 8.6 months and 29.6 ± 17.0 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.13). Confocal scan demonstrated that the keratocyte profiles and distribution were more similar to normal corneas in group 2. Significantly more severe interface haziness was observed when donor DM and endothelium was retained (mean interface reflectivity value of 102.7 ± 22.1 versus 161.7 ± 30.0 light reflectance units in groups 1 and 2, respectively, p&lt;0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Graft cellular profiles and healing response at the donor-recipient interface can be profoundly affected depending on whether donor DM and endothelium is removed or retained.