Current and future applications of corneal cross-linking:

Corneal Cross-Linking for Pediatric Keratoconus

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate corneal cross-linking (CXL) for keratoconus in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After keratometric qualification according to the Amsler-Krumeich system, corneal collagen cross-linking was performed using ultraviolet light and photosensitizing riboflavin drops in 111 eyes of 74 children with a mean age of 15 ± 1.67 years. None of the children studied wore contact lenses before the procedure. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure, keratometry, and pachymetry parameters were analyzed before and after corneal cross-linking.

RESULTS

Visual acuity was 0.64 ± 0.31 and 0.66 ± 0.29 before CXL and at the end of the follow-up, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean intraocular pressure before CXL was 14.48 ± 3.13 mmHg, while the mean value at the end of the follow-up was 14.23 ± 3.03 mmHg; no statistically significant difference was found. Pre- and post-CXL astigmatism was 3.98 ± 2.34 Dcyl and 3.63 ± 1.86 Dcyl, respectively; the difference was not statistically significant. The mean keratometry before CXL was 47.99 ± 3.96 D; the mean post-follow-up value was 47.74 ± 3.63 D. The mean corneal thickness (pachymetry) at the apex of the keratoconus-the thinnest zone of the cornea-before CXL was 492.16 ± 38.75 µm, while the mean value at the end of the follow-up was 479.99 ± 39.71 µm; the difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Corneal cross-linking is an effective method for preventing keratoconus progression in children. However, further and detailed ophthalmic follow-up of patients who underwent CXL before the age of 18 is highly advisable.

Corneal Cross-Linking as Treatment in Pediatric Keratoconus: Comparison of Two Protocols

Introduction

Keratoconus is a progressive corneal disease commonly treated by collagen cross-linking (CXL). Accelerated protocols have recently become common. This study sought to compare the outcomes of accelerated and standard CXL in terms of visual acuity, keratometry, and tomographic parameters in pediatric population.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the files of pediatric patients who underwent standard and accelerated CXL for keratoconus in our hospital, between October 2014 and March 2018. Changes in uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), tomographic keratometry parameters (K_max, K_steep, K_flat, K_mean), and endothelial density count (EDC) were assessed before and at 6 and 12 months following treatment. The analysis included intergroup and intragroup comparisons.

Results

This study included 53 eyes (44 patients). Fourteen eyes were treated with standard CXL (S-CXL, 3 mW/cm², 30 min), while 39 underwent accelerated CXL (A-CXL, 9 mW/cm², 10 min). Intergroup comparison found insignificant differences between groups, with the exception of better results for UCDVA in the S-CXL group after 12 months (P = 0.03). In this study, there was no significant difference between the two protocols postoperatively in BCDVA, K_max, K_mean, pachymetry, or corneal astigmatism.

Conclusion

A-CXL is as safe and effective as S-CXL for stabilizing progressive keratoconus in pediatric population. Larger-sample-size studies with a longer follow-up time are required. Considering the long-term results of 9 mW A-CXL and its safety and efficacy profile, it should be preferred to S-CXL for reducing treatment time and improving patients' comfort.

Long-Term Study of Corneal Stroma and Endothelium on Structure and Cells After Genipin Treatment of Rabbit Corneas

Purpose

To study the long-term safety of genipin treatment using a vacuum device with or without epithelial cells at different crosslinking times.

Methods

Twenty-five healthy New Zealand white rabbits were separated into five treatment groups: 0.25% genipin with epithelial cells for 5 minutes (G1), 0.25% genipin without epithelial cells for 5 minutes (G2), 0.25% genipin without epithelial cells for 10 minutes (G3), ultraviolet A–riboflavin collagen crosslinking (UVA), and controls (C). Before and 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks after crosslinking treatment, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT), in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and the Pentacam system were used to evaluate the right eyes.

Results

A demarcation line (DL) was observed in the corneal stroma in the G2, G3, and UVA groups. The DL depths in the G2 and G3 groups were stable but decreased in the UVA group over time. The density of keratocytes in these groups increased. Endothelial cell density was decreased in the UVA group. There were no differences in the endothelium before and after treatment in the G1, G2, G3, and C groups. The densitometry, as determined using the Pentacam system, significantly increased in the G2, G3, and UVA groups and was positively correlated with keratocyte densities.

Conclusions

A vacuum ring assisting local genipin immersion crosslinking without corneal epithelium can activate the keratocytes in the corneal stroma and was safe enough for the thin cornea.

Translational Relevance

Genipin can not only crosslink the collagen fibers but also activate the keratocytes and even may promote collagen fiber secretion.

Comparison between three protocols of corneal collagen crosslinking in adults with progressive keratoconus: Standard versus accelerated CXL for keratoconus

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare eye outcomes between the standard and accelerated corneal cross-linking (CXL) protocols over a 1-year follow-up, and assess whether the accelerated protocols are non-inferior to the standard.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study including patients older than 18 years diagnosed with progressive keratoconus who underwent a CXL procedure. The primary outcome was defined as an increase of more than 1.5 diopter (D) in Kmax. The analysis included intra- and inter-group comparisons assessing differences in eye characteristics before and 12 months after the procedure. Furthermore, we assessed whether the accelerated procedures were non-inferior to the standard regarding Kmax change after 12 months.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients included in the study of which 23, 37 and 23 underwent the standard CXL (group I), 10-min. (group II) and the 3-min. (group III) accelerated procedures, respectively. Intra-group comparison before and after 12 months of mean Ksteep and anterior corneal astigmatism showed significant improvement only for group I (-0.3D decrease for both). Inter-group comparison showed better results after 12 months for group I (-0.9 ± 1.2) compared to group III (0.1 ± 0.8) in Ksteep, Kmean (-0.5+1. vs 0.1+0.7, respectively) and anterior astigmatism (-0.5 + 0.9 vs 0.3+1.1, respectively). We could not declare that the accelerated CXLs are non-inferior to the standard (p-value = 0.11 and 0.15).

CONCLUSION

The standard CXL showed better results for keratometry and astigmatism in comparison with the accelerated. Therefore, the wide use of the accelerated CXL should be considered and reviewed for longer follow-up time and larger sample size in focus on the visual acuity parameters.

Reduced fluence corneal cross-linking in mild to moderate keratoconus: One year-follow-up

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of reduced fluence CXL (lower dose of UV-A irradiation) in mild to moderate keratoconus.

SETTING

Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.

DESIGN

Non-randomized prospective comparative interventional case series. Every eligible patient included in the study (mild to moderate progressive keratoconus) was randomly allocated to case (reduced fluence) and control (standard) groups, except for bilateral patients. In these patients the eye with more advanced disease was allocated to control group and the other eye was randomly assigned in either case or control group. Operators performing refraction and images and the data analyst were masked, but patients and physicians were not.

METHODS

Forty-six eyes of 38 patients were recruited. Group 1 received 7 min (fluence of 3.8 J/cm²), while group 2 received 10 min of 9 mW/cm² UV-A (fluence of 5.4 J/cm²). Visual, keratometric and biomechanical outcomes were compared between groups.

RESULTS

At last follow-up (mean12 months, range 6-24 months), there were no statistically significant differences in changes in uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected distance visual acuity, Kmax, Kmean, corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor, endothelial cell counts, demarcation line depth, and intraoperative pain scores between groups (all p-values < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study show comparable one-year outcomes between 3.8 and 5.4 J/cm² accelerated CXL in mild to moderate keratoconus. Should the results of this study be confirmed in longer follow-ups, using a reduced fluence setting could be considered as an alternative to standard treatment in these patients.

TFOS DEWS II iatrogenic report

Dry eye can be caused by a variety of iatrogenic interventions. The increasing number of patients looking for eye care or cosmetic procedures involving the eyes, together with a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of dry eye disease (DED), have led to the need for a specific report about iatrogenic dry eye within the TFOS DEWS II. Topical medications can cause DED due to their allergic, toxic and immuno-inflammatory effects on the ocular surface. Preservatives, such as benzalkonium chloride, may further aggravate DED. A variety of systemic drugs can also induce DED secondary to multiple mechanisms. Moreover, the use of contact lens induces or is associated with DED. However, one of the most emblematic situations is DED caused by surgical procedures such as corneal refractive surgery as in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and keratoplasty due to mechanisms intrinsic to the procedure (i.e. corneal nerve cutting) or even by the use of postoperative topical drugs. Cataract surgery, lid surgeries, botulinum toxin application and cosmetic procedures are also considered risk factors to iatrogenic DED, which can cause patient dissatisfaction, visual disturbance and poor surgical outcomes. This report also presents future directions to address iatrogenic DED, including the need for more in-depth epidemiological studies about the risk factors, development of less toxic medications and preservatives, as well as new techniques for less invasive eye surgeries. Novel research into detection of early dry eye prior to surgeries, efforts to establish appropriate therapeutics and a greater attempt to regulate and oversee medications, preservatives and procedures should be considered.

Ocular Emergencies: Red Eye

"Red eye" is used as a general term to describe irritated or bloodshot eyes. It is a recognizable sign of an acute/chronic, localized/systemic underlying inflammatory condition. Conjunctival injection is most commonly caused by dryness, allergy, visual fatigue, contact lens overwear, and local infections. In some instances, red eye can represent a true ocular emergency that should be treated by an ophthalmologist. A comprehensive assessment of red eye conditions is required to preserve the patients visual function. Severe ocular pain, significant photophobia, decreased vision, and history of ocular trauma are warning signs demanding immediate ophthalmological consultation.

In vivo human corneal deformation analysis with a Scheimpflug camera, a critical review

Corneal morphological analysis has greatly improved in recent years, providing physicians with new and reliable parameters to study. Moreover, today corneal functional too is a routine analysis, thanks to biomechanical evaluation allowed by an ocular response analyzer (Reichert Ophthalmic Instrument, Depew, NY, USA). Corvis ST (OCULUS Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany), that relies on the ultrahigh speed Scheimpflug camera, is a new device providing corneal deformation parameters measured ny scanning the cornea response to an air puff; it is an instrument able to measure intraocular pressure too. This device could open up a whole new prospective in screening, detecting and managing corneal diseases, intraocular pressure measurement and in evaluating surgical procedures involving the cornea. This paper provides a comprehensive explanation of Corvis ST measurement principles and parameters and a literature review of scientific studies.