Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation

Comparing the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas using artificial intelligence and traditional formulas in highly myopic patients: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The accuracy of intraocular lens (IOL) calculations is one of the key indicators for determining the success of cataract surgery. However, in highly myopic patients, the calculation errors are relatively larger than those in general patients. With the continuous development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, there has also been a constant emergence of AI-related calculation formulas. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the accuracy of AI calculation formulas in calculating the power of IOL for highly myopic patients.

METHODS

We searched the relevant literature through August 2023 using three databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Six IOL calculation formulas were compared: Kane, Hill-RBF, EVO, Barrett II, Haigis, and SRK/T. The included metrics were the mean absolute error (MAE) and percentage of errors within ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D.

RESULTS

The results showed that the MAE of Kane was significantly lower than that of Barrett II (mean difference = - 0.03 D, P = 0.02), SRK/T (MD = - 0.08 D, P = 0.02), and Haigis (MD = - 0.12 D, P < 0.00001). The percentage refractive prediction errors for Kane at ± 0.25 D, ± 0.50 D, and ± 1.00 D were significantly greater than those for SRK/T (P = 0.007, 0.003, and 0.01, respectively) and Haigis (P = 0.009, 0.0001, and 0.001, respectively). No statistically significant differences were noted between Hill-RBF and Barret, but Hill-RBF was significantly better than SRK/T and Haigis.

CONCLUSION

The AI calculation formulas showed more accurate results compared with traditional formulas. Among them, Kane has the best performance in calculating IOL degrees for highly myopic patients.

Evaluation of a new dynamic real-time visualization 25 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a newly developed dynamic real-time visualization 25 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based biometer (ZW-30, TowardPi Medical Technology Ltd, China) and compare its agreement with another SS-OCT based biometer (IOLMaster 700, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany).

METHODS

Eighty-two healthy right eyes were enrolled in this prospective observational study. Measurements were repeated for three times using the ZW-30 and IOLMaster 700 in a random order. Obtained parameters included axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), aqueous depth (AQD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism magnitude (AST), vector J0, vector J45, and corneal diameter (CD). The within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest (TRT) variability, coefficient of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were adopted to assess the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. The double-angle plot was also used to display the distribution of AST. To estimate agreement, Bland-Altman plots were used.

RESULTS

For the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility, the Sw, TRT and CoV for all parameters were low. Meanwhile, the ICC values were all close to 1.000, except for the J45 (ICC = 0.887 for the intraobserver repeatability). The double-angle plot showed that the distribution of AST measured by these two devices was similar. For agreement, the Bland-Altman plots showed narrow 95% limits of agreements (LoAs) for AL, CCT, AQD, ACD, LT, Km AST, J0, J45, and CD (- 0.02 mm to 0.02 mm, - 7.49 μm to 8.08 μm, - 0.07 mm to 0.04 mm, - 0.07 mm to 0.04 mm, - 0.07 mm to 0.08 mm, - 0.16 D to 0.30 D, - 0.30 D to 0.29 D, - 0.16 D to 0.16 D, - 0.23 D to 0.13 D, and - 0.39 mm to 0.10 mm, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The newly dynamic real-time visualization biometer exhibited excellent intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. The two devices both based on the SS-OCT principle had similar ocular parameters measurement values and can be interchanged in clinical practice.

A Review of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas Based on Artificial Intelligence

PURPOSE

The proper selection of an intraocular lens power calculation formula is an essential aspect of cataract surgery. This study evaluated the accuracy of artificial intelligence-based formulas.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

This review comprises articles evaluating the exactness of artificial intelligence-based formulas published from 2017 to July 2023. The papers were identified by a literature search of various databases (Pubmed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Crossref, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and SciELO) using the terms "IOL formulas", "FullMonte", "Ladas", "Hill-RBF", "PEARL-DGS", "Kane", "Karmona", "Hoffer QST", and "Nallasamy". In total, 25 peer-reviewed articles in English with the maximum sample and the largest number of compared formulas were examined.

RESULTS

The scores of the mean absolute error and percentage of patients within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were used to estimate the exactness of the formulas. In most studies the Kane formula obtained the smallest mean absolute error and the highest percentage of patients within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D. Second place was typically achieved by the PEARL DGS formula. The limitations of the studies were also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Kane seems to be the most accurate artificial intelligence-based formula. PEARL DGS also gives very good results. Hoffer QST, Karmona, and Nallasamy are the newest, and need further evaluation.

Brown syndrome: a literature review

The current data on various aspects of Brown syndrome are limited and sporadic. This review provides a coherent and comprehensive review of basic features, etiology, classification, differential diagnosis, and different management strategies of patients with Brown syndrome. In this topical review, PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines were searched for papers, published between 1950 and January 2023 based on the keywords of this article. The related articles were collected, summarized, categorized, assessed, concluded, and presented. Brown syndrome is identified by restricted passive and active elevation of the eye in adduction. The condition is divided into congenital and acquired causes. The clinical features result from a restricted motion of the superior oblique tendon sheath through the trochlea while trying to look up in adduction. The newest explanation of the underlying pathophysiology has been explained as the presence of a fibrotic strand in the superior oblique muscle tendon with variable insertion sites which creates various elevation deficits seen in Brown syndrome. The most common clinical features include the presence of an abnormal head posture, V-pattern strabismus, and hypotropia in the primary position. Management of Brown syndrome includes watchful observation, surgical, and non-surgical procedures. Some cases might resolve spontaneously without any intervention; however, some acquired cases might require systemic and/or intra-trochlear steroid administration to treat the underlying causes. Surgical procedures such as superior oblique tenectomy and using a silicon tendon expander are indicated in the presence of hypotropia and significant abnormal head posture in the primary position.

Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas-A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The proper choice of an intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formula is an important aspect of phacoemulsification. In this study, the formulas most commonly used today are described and their accuracy is evaluated.

METHODS

This review includes papers evaluating the accuracy of IOL power calculation formulas published during the period from January 2015 to December 2022. The articles were identified by a literature search of medical and other databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Crossref, Web of Science, SciELO, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library) using the terms "IOL formulas," "Barrett Universal II," "Kane," "Hill-RBF," "Olsen," "PEARL-DGS," "EVO," "Haigis," "SRK/T," and "Hoffer Q." Twenty-nine of the most recent peer-reviewed papers in English with the largest samples and largest number of formulas compared were considered.

RESULTS

Outcomes of mean absolute error and percentage of predictions within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D were used to evaluate the accuracy of the formulas. In most studies, Barrett achieved the smallest mean absolute error and PEARL-DGS the highest percentage of patients with ±0.5 D in short eyes, while Kane obtained the highest percentage of patients with ±0.5 D in long eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The third- and fourth-generation formulas are gradually being replaced by more accurate ones. The Barrett Universal II among vergence formulas and Kane and PEARL-DGS among artificial intelligence-based formulas are currently most often reported as the most precise.

Panretinal Optical Coherence Tomography

We introduce a new concept of panoramic retinal (panretinal) optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging system with a 140° field of view (FOV). To achieve this unprecedented FOV, a contact imaging approach was used which enabled faster, more efficient, and quantitative retinal imaging with measurement of axial eye length. The utilization of the handheld panretinal OCT imaging system could allow earlier recognition of peripheral retinal disease and prevent permanent vision loss. In addition, adequate visualization of the peripheral retina has a great potential for better understanding disease mechanisms regarding the periphery. To the best of our knowledge, the panretinal OCT imaging system presented in this manuscript has the widest FOV among all the retina OCT imaging systems and offers significant values in both clinical ophthalmology and basic vision science.

Comparison of corneal measurements using two different Scheimpflug analyzers in Sirius and Pentacam devices

The aim was to compare measurements of anterior segment biometry parameters using two Scheimpflug tomographies, Pentacam and Sirius to assess the agreement. Prospective cross-sectional observational study. A total of 60 eyes of 30 healthy subjects were included and evaluated with Pentacam followed by Sirius imaging. Corneal indices were performed with two modalities in both eyes including; apical corneal thickness (ACT), corneal thickness at pupil site(PCT), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), chamber angle, chamber volume, cornea volume, mean front keratometry (FKm), the radius of corneal curvature at the anterior and posterior surface in steep and flat meridian, anterior astigmatism values, pupil diameter, and horizontal corneal diameter. The Bland-Altman graph and ICC (intra-class correlation were used to establish an agreement and present the similarity of the findings. Most parameters showed perfect agreement. In both devices, the ICC was more than 0.91 in all measurements except for ACD (ICC = 0.820), cylinder axis (ICC = 0.520), TCT(ICC = 0.881), ACT(ICC = 0.672), PCT (ICC = 0.882), chamber angle (ICC = 0.362), pupil diameter(ICC = 0.137). Pentacam yielded higher values that were significant in five parameters including 3.47 μm for TCT, 4.29 µm for PCT, 10.03 mm3 for chamber volume,2.67 mm3 for cornea volume, and 1.49 mm for pupil diameter but there was only a statistically significant difference in cornea volume and pupil diameter (p-value < 0.001). However, in Pentacam only the chamber angle value was 6.44 mm3 lower than Sirius, with a statistically significant difference (p-value < 0.001). Although these two devices had some statistically different results, it seems that they have a good agreement and correlation in most parameters.

Change in major ocular biometry parameters axial length and keratometry in adults over time

PURPOSE

To determine how much axial length (AL) and average keratometry (K) change over time in elderly patients and to assess clinical necessity of repeating biometry in instances where the second eye is operated on 6 months or more after the first.

SETTING

Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were patients older than 35 years, with 2 biometry measurements over 6 months apart, measured with the IOL Master 700 from January 1, 2016, to September 15, 2020. Patients were excluded if they had any other intraocular surgery besides cataract. A linear mixed model and SPSS software was used to compare measurements among timepoints.

RESULTS

201 patients (402 eyes) were included (average age 73.3, 59.3% female). Average time between biometry measurements was 21.5 months (range 6 to 48 months). The mean change in AL was 0.04 mm (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.05, P = .10). The mean change in K was 0.01 diopters (95% CI, -0.10 to 0.30, P = .33). At the 6-month to 1-year interval (n = 73), mean change in AL was 0.04 mm. Mean change in AL did not significantly increase with greater time intervals. There was no correlation between time and ΔAL ( P = .70), nor between time and ΔK ( P = .98).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, biometric parameters did not change significantly over time. Repeating biometry at a 1- to 2-year interval for elderly patients receiving monofocal implants may offer limited benefit.

Clinically Significant Axial Shortening in Myopic Children After Repeated Low-Level Red Light Therapy: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Myopia is recognized as a progressive eye disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and associated factors of clinically significant axial length (AL) shortening among myopic children following repeated low-level red light (RLRL) therapy.

METHODS

The clinical data that were collected for the myopic children aged 3-17 years who received an RLRL therapy delivered by home-use desktop light device that emitted light at 650 nm for at least 1 year, were reviewed. The clinical data included AL, spherical equivalent refraction (SER), and visual acuity measured at baseline and follow-up. The primary outcomes were frequency of AL shortening of > 0.05 mm, > 0.10 mm, and > 0.20 mm per year, and associated factors of AL shortening per year.

RESULTS

A total of 434 myopic children with at least 12 months of follow-up data were included. The mean age of participants was 9.7 (2.6) years with SER of -3.74 (2.60) diopters. There were 115 (26.50%), 76 (17.51%), and 20 (4.61%) children with AL shortening based on cutoffs of 0.05 mm/year, 0.10 mm/year, and 0.20 mm/year, respectively. In the multivariable model, AL shortening was significantly associated with older baseline age, female gender, and longer baseline AL or greater spherical equivalent refraction (all P < 0.05). Among AL shortened eyes, the mean AL difference (standard deviation, SD) was -0.142 (0.094) mm/year. Greater AL shortening was observed among children who were younger and had longer baseline AL (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

More than a quarter of children had AL shortening > 0.05 mm following RLRL therapy, and the overall mean AL change was -0.142 mm/year. Further studies should explore the mechanisms underlying AL shortening.

Refractive error after combined phaco-vitrectomy: A multicentric study

PURPOSE

To study the post-operative refractive error (RE) of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy and to find out which intraocular lens (IOL)-power formula had the best refractive outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicentric study we compared the preoperative expected target with the postoperative RE of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy due to vitreomacular traction, macular pucker, full thickness macular hole or lamellar macular hole. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to compare the postoperative REs and the differences between expected and postoperative REs among the SRK-T, Olsen's and Holladay-2 formulas. The correlation between the difference in REs and IOL-power was also studied.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven eyes with a mean axial length of 23.73 ± 1.21 mm were included. Forty-two (63%), 14 (21%) and 11 (16%) eyes were implanted with an IOL that was calculated respectively with SRK-T, Olsen's and the Holladay-2 formula. The mean preoperative expected- and post-operative REs were -0.16 ± 0.12D and -0.48 ± 0.17, respectively (p = 0.045). SRK-T and Holladay-2 formulas led to a significant myopic shift whereas Olsen's caused a significant hyperopic error, independently from the IOL power.

CONCLUSION

Independently from the IOL power, none of the analyzed formulas is precise at calculating the post-operative RE.

Comprehensive comparisons of ocular biometry: A network-based big data analysis

PURPOSE

To systematically compare and rank ocular measurements with optical and ultrasound biometers based on big data.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the US trial registry ( www.

CLINICALTRIAL

gov ) were used to systematically search trials published up to October 22nd, 2020. We included comparative studies reporting the following parameters measured by at least two devices: axial length (AL), flattest meridian keratometry (Kf), steepest meridian keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism (AST), astigmatism vectors J₀ and J₄₅, anterior chamber depth (ACD), aqueous depth (AQD), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal diameter (CD) and lens thickness (LT). A network-based big data analysis was conducted using STATA version 13.1.

RESULTS

Across 129 studies involving 17,181 eyes, 12 optical biometers and two ultrasound biometers (with both contact and immersion techniques) were identified. A network meta-analysis for AL and ACD measurements found that statistically significant differences existed when contact ultrasound biometry was compared with the optical biometers. There were no statistically significant differences among the four swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) based devices (IOLMaster 700, OA-2000, Argos and ANTERION). As for Ks, Km and CD, statistically significant differences were found when the Pentacam AXL was compared with the IOLMaster and IOLMaster 500. There were statistically significant differences for CCT when the OA-2000 was compared to Pentacam AXL, IOLMaster 700, Lenstar, AL-Scan and Galilei G6.

CONCLUSION

For AL and ACD, contact ultrasound biometry obtains the lower values compared with optical biometers. The Pentacam AXL achieves the lowest values for keratometry and CD. The smallest value for CCT measurement is found with the OA-2000.

Accuracy of axial length, keratometry, and refractive measurement with Myopia Master in children with ametropia

PURPOSE

To evaluate the accuracy of axial length, keratometry, and refractive measurement with Myopia Master in ametropic children.

METHODS

In this randomized prospective cross-sectional study, 125 children with ametropia (250 eyes) were recruited (55 boys and 70 girls; age range: 3-15 years). All examinations were performed under full cycloplegic conditions. Measurements of axial length (AL), keratometry, and autorefraction acquired with the Myopia Master were compared with those from the IOLMaster 500, IOLMaster 700, Nidek ARK-1, and manifest refraction. The differences between the different methods were analyzed, and their correlation was assessed by interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Bland-Altman plot, and correlation test.

RESULTS

The ALs (mm) measured with Myopia Master, IOLMaster 500, and IOLMaster 700 were 23.67 ± 1.26, 23.68 ± 1.26, and 23.70 ± 1.25, respectively. The mean values and standard deviations for AL and keratometry readings from these devices were similar (P ≥ 0.059). The ICC analysis also revealed high consistency between the measurements (ICC ≥ 0.943). Additionally, the correlation coefficients were relatively high (r > 0.9, p < 0.001). Although the results of refraction obtained with the Myopia Master were slightly higher than those with manifest refraction (P ≤ 0.024), the agreement between these two measurements was excellent (ICC ≥ 0.858). The percentage of points outside the limits of agreements was < 5.22% in Bland-Altman plots for all analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Myopia Master could be a highly efficient tool for clinical use as a three-in-one system (AL, keratometry, and refractive measurements) for screening in children with ametropia.

Simulated keratometry and central corneal thickness measured in cats by autokeratometer, ultrasonic pachymeter, and Galilei G6™

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) measured by an ultrasonic pachymeter (SP-100, Tomey, Japão) versus the Galilei G6™ (Ziemer Ophthalmics System AG, Port, Switzerland) and to compare the simulated keratometry (SimK) measured by an autokeratometer (KM 500 Nidek) versus the Galilei G6™.

ANIMAL STUDIED

Eighteen mixed-breed cats, 10 males, and eight females, aged between 18 and 48 months, were evaluated (n = 36 eyes).

PROCEDURE(S)

The cats were manually restrained using a blanket. The operator held the autokeratometer close to the eye and measured the SimK. Next, one anesthetic eye drop was applied; the operator lightly touched the corneal using the ultrasound pachymeter and measured the CCT. At another moment, the cats were sedated using meperidine and xylazine and then evaluated using the Galilei. Student's t-test was employed to perform the statistical analyzes.

RESULTS

Considering the CCT, the ultrasound pachymeter provided mean ± SD of 623.03 ± 48.17 μm and the Galilei 617.34 ± 53.38 μm. The autokeratometer produced a SimK of 38.20 ± 0.84D (8.84 ± 0.20 mm) and the Galilei 38.37 ± 0.83D (8.80 ± 0.19 mm). The CCT and SimK did not differ statistically regardless of the device used.

CONCLUSION

To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first work to compare the CCT measured by the Galilei versus the ultrasonic pachymeter and to compare the SimK measured by the Galilei versus the keratometer in cats. No statistical difference was found considering the CCT and the SimK measured by the different devices.

Assessment of the Refractive Error and Stabilisation of Refraction after Cataract Surgery in Relation to the Length of the Eyeball

The aim of this study was to analyse the changes in refraction, depending on the length of the eyeball, in patients who had undergone cataract surgery using the phacoemulsification method and to assess the stability of refraction. A total of 90 patients (46 to 85 years of age) took part in the study and were divided into three groups: emmetropic, hypermetropic, and myopic. Two types of intraocular lenses were used: Bausch (Akreos AO) and Rayner (C-flex). In conclusion, stabilization of refraction was achieved in the third week in 91% of the emmetropic, 77% of the myopic, and 46% of the hypermetropic patients, respectively. The correct postoperative refraction was achieved using optical biometry and the Barrett Universal II formula to calculate the power of the lens implant.

Clinical evaluation of ocular biometry of dual Scheimpflug analyzer, GALILEI G6 and swept source optical coherence tomography, ANTERION

To evaluate the performance of a new swept source optical coherence tomography optical biometer, ANTERION, in ocular biometry and intraocular lens (IOL) calculation compared with the reference standard of Dual Scheimpflug Analyzer (GALILEI, G6). A prospective comparative study was conducted in a tertiary eye center. Cataract patients were scanned with both devices in a random fashion, and parameters from the devices were analyzed in terms of mean difference and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland–Altman plots were performed to compare agreement between the devices. Ninety-six eyes from 96 patients were enrolled for evaluation. With the exception of ACD, all parameters were significantly different, but excellent agreement was revealed for all of them. The mean difference in axial length was 0.03 mm, and ICC was 0.999. Calculated IOL power with Barrett formula revealed that 93.75% were within 1 diopter and the prediction error was 0.03 diopter. Biometry of the devices were arithmetically different. However, the mean difference of the key factors in IOL calculation were small and appeared to be negligible for the purposes of clinical application. The performance of ANTERION was comparable to that of G6 in biometric measurement and IOL calculation; however, the devices cannot be used interchangeably.

Comparison Study of the Two Biometers Based on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Technology

This research aimed to investigate the potential differences in the parameters, including axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), flat keratometry (Kf), steep keratometry (Ks), mean keratometry (Km), astigmatism, white-to-white (WTW) distance, acquired rate, and intraocular lens (IOL) power, between the two swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometers, the ANTERION (biometer A) and IOLMaster 700 (biometer B). In a prospective observational comparative case series study, we enrolled 198 eyes undergoing cataract surgery. The AL, CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, astigmatism, WTW, acquired rate, and IOL power were assessed. McNemar tests compared the acquired rate, and the paired sample t-test compared the quantitative measurement results between the groups. Nineteen eyes were excluded owing to missing AL data for either biometer. Finally, data from 179 eyes were analyzed. Between the two devices, no significant difference was found in AL, astigmatism magnitude, J0, and J45, while significant differences existed in CCT, ACD, LT, Kf, Ks, Km, WTW, astigmatism axis, and IOL power; no statistical significance was found in the AL acquired rate (biometer A, 90.9% and biometer B, 93.9%). Approximately 65.4% of eyes demonstrated ≥0.5-D difference in IOL power between the two biometers. In conclusion, the two biometers showed significant differences in all measurements (CCT, ACD, LT, K, WTW, astigmatism axis, and IOL power), except for AL.

Investigating target refraction advice provided to cataract surgery patients by UK optometrists and ophthalmologists

PURPOSE

To determine whether UK optometrists and ophthalmologists provide target refraction advice to patients prior to cataract surgery, and when this should first be discussed.

METHODS

Optometrists and ophthalmologists were asked to complete a survey of two clinical vignettes (both older patients with cataract; a pre-operative myope who routinely read without glasses and a patient using a monovision approach), plus multiple choice and short answer questions either using hard copy or online.

RESULTS

Responses were obtained from 437 optometrists and 50 ophthalmologists. Optometrists who reported they would provide target refraction advice were more experienced (median 22 years) than those who would leave this to the Hospital Eye Service (median 10 years). The former group reported it was in the patients' best interest to make an informed decision as they had seen many myopic patients who read uncorrected pre-operatively, and were unhappy that they could no longer do so after surgery. Inexperienced optometrists reported that they did not want to overstep their authority and left the decision to the ophthalmologist. The ophthalmologists estimated their percentage of emmetropic target refractions over the last year to have been 90%.

CONCLUSION

Currently, some long-term myopes become dissatisfied after cataract surgery due to an emmetropic target refraction that leaves them unable to read without glasses as they did prior to surgery. Although experienced optometrists are aware of this and attempt to discuss this issue with patients, less experienced optometrists tend not to. This suggests that target refraction needs greater exposure in university training and continuing professional development. To provide patients with the knowledge to make informed decisions regarding their surgery, we suggest an agreed protocol within funded direct referral schemes of initial target refraction discussions by optometrists to introduce the idea of refractive outcomes and outline options, with further discussion with the ophthalmologist to clarify understanding.

High speed, long range, deep penetration swept source OCT for structural and angiographic imaging of the anterior eye

This study reports the development of prototype swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) technology for imaging the anterior eye. Advances in vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser (VCSEL) light sources, signal processing, optics and mechanical designs, enable a unique combination of high speed, long range, and deep penetration that addresses the challenges of anterior eye imaging. We demonstrate SS-OCT with a 325 kHz A-scan rate, 12.2 µm axial resolution (in air), and 15.5 mm depth range (in air) at 1310 nm wavelength. The ultrahigh 325 kHz A-scan rate not only facilitates biometry measurements by minimizing acquisition time and thus reducing motion, but also enables volumetric OCT for comprehensive structural analysis and OCT angiography (OCTA) for visualizing vasculature. The 15.5 mm (~ 11.6 mm in tissue) depth range spans all optical surfaces from the anterior cornea to the posterior lens capsule. The 1310 nm wavelength range enables structural OCT and OCTA deep in the sclera and through the iris. Achieving high speed and long range requires linearizing the VCSEL wavenumber sweep to efficiently utilize analog-to-digital conversion bandwidth. Dual channel recording of the OCT and calibration interferometer fringe signals, as well as sweep to sweep wavenumber compensation, is used to achieve invariant 12.2 µm (~ 9.1 µm in tissue) axial resolution and optimum point spread function throughout the depth range. Dynamic focusing using a tunable liquid lens extends the effective depth of field while preserving the lateral resolution. Improved optical and mechanical design, including parallax “split view” iris cameras and stable, ergonomic patient interface, facilitates accurate instrument positioning, reduces patient motion, and leads to improved imaging data yield and measurement accuracy. We present structural and angiographic OCT images of the anterior eye, demonstrating the unique imaging capabilities using representative scanning protocols which may be relevant to future research and clinical applications.

Refractive Outcomes after Cataract Surgery

A post-operative manifest refractive error as close as possible to target is key when performing cataract surgery with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, given that residual astigmatism and refractive errors negatively impact patients’ vision and satisfaction. This review explores refractive outcomes prior to modern biometry; advances in biometry and its impact on patients’ vision and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery; key factors that affect prediction accuracy; and residual refractive errors and the impact on visual outcomes. There are numerous pre-, intra-, and post-operative factors that can influence refractive outcomes after cataract surgery, leaving surgeons with a small “error budget” (i.e., the source and sum of all influencing factors). To mitigate these factors, precise measurement and correct application of ocular biometric data are required. With advances in optical biometry, prediction of patient post-operative refractory status has become more accurate, leading to an increased proportion of patients achieving their target refraction. Alongside improvements in biometry, advancements in microsurgical techniques, new IOL technologies, and enhancements to IOL power calculations have also positively impacted patients’ refractory status after cataract surgery.

THE EXACTNESS OF INTRAOCULAR LENS POWER CALCULATION FORMULAS FOR SHORT EYES AND CORRELATION BETWEEN METHOD ACCURACY AND EYEBALL AXIAL LENGTH

PURPOSE

To compare the accuracy of intraocular lens power calculation formulas and to examine the correlation of this exactness with the axial length for eyes shorter than 22.00 mm Methods: The data of hyperopic patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification between October 2015 and June 2019 were reviewed. The intraocular lens power for each patient was calculated using 6 formulas (Holladay1, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Holladay 2, Haigis and Barrett Universal II) before cataract surgery. Postoperative refraction was measured, and refractive prediction error was calculated 3 months after phacoemulsification. The correlation between axial length and absolute error was evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients (62 eyes) whose ocular axial length ranged between 20.58 mm and 21.97 mm were included in the study. The Hoffer Q formula achieved the lowest mean absolute error of 0.09 (±0.08 D). A significant correlation for the Hoffer Q (&#961; = -0.329, p = 0.009) and the SRK/T (&#961; = 0.321, p = 0.011) formula was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

1. The Hoffer Q formula obtained the lowest absolute error and was recommended for intraocular lens power calculation for eyeballs with axial length shorter than 22.0 mm. 2. The correlation between axial length and absolute error is a factor which should be considered when calculating intraocular lens power.

A-scan ultrasound in ophthalmology: A simulation tool

In the present study, we developed a computational tool for simulating the ophthalmological applications of A-scan ultrasound, including cataract characterisation and biometry. A-scan biometry is used to measure the axial length (AL) of the eye before cataract surgery to calculate the refractive power of the intraocular lens to be implanted. Errors in the measurement of the AL lead to post-surgical refractive errors. The simulation tool was developed using the k-Wave Matlab toolbox, together with a user-friendly interface developed in Matlab. Diverse error sources were evaluated. Constant ultrasound speed assumptions may introduce refractive errors of up to 0.6 D; by contrast, probe positioning errors had a lower impact, of up to 0.11 D. The correct identification of the Bruch's membrane is limited not only by axial resolution constraints but also by the low reflection coefficient at the retina/choroid interface. Regarding cataract characterisation, the amplitudes of the echoes reflected at the lens interfaces are sensitive to diverse cataract types and severities, and a more realistic representation could be obtained by using a higher resolution in the eye grid; however, the required computational times would make simulations impracticable when using personal computers. The simulation tool shows good versatility for evaluating diverse aspects of A-scan biometry.

Evaluation of the agreement of optical biometry and Scheimpflug corneal topography with different axial lengths

PURPOSE

To compare anterior segment parameters evaluated with optical low coherence reflectometry and combined Scheimpflug-Placido disc topography in eyes with different axial lengths.

METHODS

Deux cent quatre patients were divided into 3 groups according to their axial lengths. Central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (AD), mean keratometry value (K mean) and white-to-white distances (WTW) obtained from both devices were compared. All measurements were performed 3 times and averaged.

RESULTS

In group 1, a significant difference was detected between the two devices for CCT, WTW and Kmean measurements (P<0.001, P<0.001, p:0.005 respectively). In group 2, a significant difference was detected between the two devices for WTW measurement (P<0.001). In group 3, a significant difference was detected between the two devices for CCT and WTW measurement (P<0.001, P<0.001 respectively). In the Bland-Altman analysis, there was no match for Kmean obtained with both devices in group 1. In group 2, there was no agreement for AD obtained with both devices. In group 3, there was no match for AD, WTW or Kmean values obtained with both devices.

CONCLUSION

Some anterior segment parameters are not suitable for interchangeability in eyes with different axial lengths evaluated by Lenstar and Sirius anterior segment imaging systems. When planning critical surgery and treatment, more attention should be paid to measurements in eyes of different axial lengths.

Effect of Cyclosporine 0.09% Treatment on Accuracy of Preoperative Biometry and Higher Order Aberrations in Dry Eye Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To determine the effect of topical cyclosporine 0.09% on ocular surface regularity and the predictive accuracy of preoperative corneal power measurements in patients undergoing cataract surgery.

Setting

Private practice.

Design

Open-label, multicenter, prospective study.

Methods

Seventy-five patients (75 eyes) who presented for cataract surgery evaluation with signs of dry eye disease were prescribed topical cyclosporine 0.09% for 28 days BID. Corneal curvature measurements, slit lamp exam, and Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) questionnaire were evaluated at the initial and follow-up visits. Cataract surgery occurred 1 to 3 weeks after the second biometry visit. Refraction and corrected distance visual acuity measurements were performed 1-month post-surgery. The primary outcome was the difference in absolute prediction error of 1-month spherical equivalent refractive outcome before and after cyclosporine treatment. Secondary outcomes included the effect of topical cyclosporine 0.09% on ocular surface irregularity.

Results

Sixty-four patients completed the study. The absolute prediction error of 1-month spherical equivalent refractive outcome was 0.39 ± 0.30 D vs 0.33 ± 0.25 D (P < 0.03) before and after treatment, respectively. The proportion of eyes that achieved the target refraction was greater based on measurements after topical cyclosporine 0.09% than would have occurred using pre-treatment measurements.

Conclusion

Cataract surgery patients with dry eye who are prescribed topical cyclosporine 0.09% BID for 28 days pre-surgery showed a statistically significant improvement in the prediction error of the spherical equivalent outcome of surgery. Other measures of dry eye severity showed significant improvements after treatment.

Distribution of ocular biometry in young Chinese eyes: The Anyang University Students Eye Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the distribution of ocular biometric parameters and its association to refraction in university students in central China.

METHODS

Ocular biometric parameters including axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), keratometry power (K), anterior chamber depth (AQD) and lens thickness (LT) were measured by an optical biometry in a cohort of university students. Corneal radius of curvature (CR), lens position (LP), lens power (P_Bennett ), vitreous chamber depth (VCD) and AL to corneal radius ratio (AL/CR) were calculated. Cycloplegic refraction was measured using an autorefractor.

RESULTS

A total of 7650 undergraduate students participated in this study, with a mean age of 20.0 ± 1.4 years. The following ocular biometric parameters were measured: AL (24.78 ± 1.21 mm), CCT (539.83 ± 33.03 μm), AQD (3.23 ± 0.25 mm), LT (3.47 ± 0.18 mm), CR (7.79 ± 0.27 mm), LP (4.97 ± 0.23 mm), VCD (17.55 ± 1.15 mm), P_Bennett (25.00 ± 1.07 dioptres) and AL/CR (3.18 ± 0.15). Male subjects were found to have longer AL, thicker CCT, flatter CR, thinner lens, deeper AQD and VCD than female ones. Myopic subjects were found to have longer AL, thinner CCT, steeper CR, thinner and posterior lens, deeper AQD and VCD, lower P_Bennett and larger AL/CR than emmetropes and hyperopes. Spherical equivalent (SE) showed a negative correlation with AL/CR (r = -0.914), AL (r = -0.755) and VCD (r = -0.751).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided a range of reference values for the main ocular biometric parameters in young adults and reported their distributions based on gender and refractive status. Our study indicates that SE has a strong correlation with AL/CR ratio, AL and VCD.

Repeatability of biometry measured by three devices and its impact on predicted intraocular lens power

PURPOSE

To compare the repeatability of ocular biometry measured with the LENSTAR LS 900, IOLMaster 700, and Anterion and its impact on predicted intraocular lens (IOL) power.

SETTING

Tertiary eye-care facility in South India.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Eyes diagnosed with cataract had 3 consecutive scans on each biometers. The repeatability was assessed using the within-subject standard deviation (Sw), test-retest repeatability, and coefficient of variation (CoV). The agreement was evaluated with the intraclass correlation (ICC). The IOL power was calculated with the Barrett Universal II formula.

RESULTS

The study comprised 127 eyes of 76 patients. The repeatability of all parameters for a given device were excellent (ICC >0.9, low CoV and Sw). The agreement of the parameters between the biometers was very good (range from 0.93 to 0.99). The predicted IOL power differed statistically between the devices (P < .05), but the difference was clinically insignificant between the 3 biometers (ICC >0.99 for repeat calculation of IOL power).

CONCLUSIONS

All the biometers included in the study had good to excellent repeatability of biometry parameters. The agreement of the predicted IOL power was excellent between the 3 optical biometers.

Comparison of keratometry data using handheld and table-mounted instruments in healthy adults

PURPOSE

To compare keratometry data between the handheld Retinomax K-plus 3 and the table-mounted IOLMaster 700.

METHODS

Healthy adult volunteers were prospectively recruited to the study. All participants underwent 3 consecutive keratometry measurements using the Retinomax K-plus 3 and a single biometry assessment using the IOLMaster 700. Differences between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 were assessed using Wilcoxon test for paired samples, Spearman correlation, Bland-Altman and mountain plots.

RESULT

Twenty-eight healthy subjects with a median age of 37 years (interquartile range (IQR) 28-44 years) were included in the study. The median mean keratometry (mean K) reading was higher using the Retinomax K-plus 3 (44.04D; IQR 42.96-45.61D) compared to the IOLMaster 700 (43.78D; IQR 43.22-44.90D, p < 0.01), with a mean difference of 0.18D (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.23D). Mean K readings were highly correlated between the 2 devices (r = 0.995, p < 0.01). Bland-Altman plots showed 95% limits of agreement between -0.14D and 0.49D. Frequency histogram of mean K reading differences between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 showed that 56% of cases were between ± 0.2D, 93% of cases were between ± 0.4D and all cases were between ± 0.5D. Mean corneal astigmatism measurement was higher using the Retinomax K-plus 3 (1.01 ± 0.40D) compared to the IOLMaster 700 (0.77 ± 0.36D), with a mean difference of 0.23 ± 0.37D (p < 0.01) between the devices.

CONCLUSIONS

A good agreement exists between the Retinomax K-plus 3 and the IOLMaster 700 regarding keratometry readings. This enables cataract surgeons to safely use the Retinomax K-plus 3 device when indicated.

Extended measuring depth dual-wavelength Fourier domain optical coherence tomography

In this work an enhanced wide range dual band spectral domain optical coherence tomography technique (SD-OCT) is presented to increase the depth and accuracy of the measurement of optical A-scan biometry. The setup uses a Michelson interferometer with two wide-spectrum Superluminescent Diodes (SLD). The emissions of the SLDs are filtered by a long-pass filter (900 nm) in front of the reference mirror. The light is spectrally decomposed using a single reflective diffraction grating (1,800 lines/mm) and the whole spectrum captured with two CCD line sensors. The capabilities of the system have been validated using a self-made human model eye.

Refractive accuracy and visual outcomes after combined descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and cataract surgery: A French multicentric study

PURPOSE

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) combined with cataract extraction and intraocular lens insertion (new triple procedure) limits postoperative refractive errors. The objective of this study was to assess refractive accuracy after DMEK combined with cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation.

SETTING

Four university hospitals (Rouen, Paris, Reims, Grenoble).

DESIGN

This retrospective multicenter study included patients with symptomatic corneal endothelial decompensation and cataract.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the difference between the target spherical equivalent and postoperative refraction at months 2 and 6. Secondary outcomes were visual acuity, keratometry, pachymetry and endothelial cell density.

RESULTS

A total of 130 eyes of 111 patients (mean age 66.2 years) were included (94% with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy). For a mean refractive target set at -0.50 (±0.57) D, the mean (95% CI) refractive error was hyperopia of +0.49 (0.314; 0.664) D at 2 months and +0.46 (0.299; 0.619) D at 6 months. Best corrected distance visual acuity was improved in all patients: from 0.49 (±0.3) logMAR to 0.14 (±0.14) logMAR at 2 months and 0.05 (±0.1) logMAR at 6 months. Mean corneal thickness decreased from 621.6 (±37.6) μm to 515.2 (±42.6) μm at 2 months and 539.0 (±39.0) μm at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Good refractive accuracy was obtained after the new triple procedure with DMEK. Hyperopic shift is common after triple procedures, and its persistence should be evaluated in future studies in order to anticipate a change in its value to optimize intraocular lens power calculation.

Recurring themes during cataract assessment and surgery

The aim of this review was to discuss frequently encountered themes such as cataract surgery in presence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), dementia, Immediate Sequential Bilateral Cataract Surgery (ISBCS), discussing non-standard intraocular lens (IOL) options during consultation in the National Health Services (NHS) and the choice of the biometric formulae based on axial length. Individual groups of authors worked independently on each topic. We found that cataract surgery does improve visual acuity in AMD patients but the need for cataract surgery should be individualised. In patients with dementia, cataract surgery should be considered 'sooner rather than later' as progression may prevent individuals presenting for surgery. This should be planned after discussion of patients' best interests with any carers; multifocal IOLs are not proven to be the best option in these patients. ISBCS gives comparable outcomes to delayed sequential surgeries with a low risk of bilateral endophthalmitis and it can be cost-saving and efficient. Patients are entitled to know all suitable IOL options that can improve their quality of life. Deliberately withholding this information or pressuring patients to choose a non-standard IOL is inappropriate. However, one should be mindful of the not spending inappropriate amounts of time discussing these in the NHS setting which may affect care of other NHS patients. Evidence suggests Hoffer Q, Haigis, Hill-RBF and Kane formulae for shorter eyes; Barrett Universal II (BU II), Holladay II, Haigis and Kane formulae for longer eyes and BU II, Hill-RBF and Kane formulae for medium axial length eyes.

Simulating Outcomes of Cataract Surgery: Important Advances in Ophthalmology

As the human eye ages, the crystalline lens stiffens (presbyopia) and opacifies (cataract), requiring its replacement with an artificial lens [intraocular lens (IOL)]. Cataract surgery is the most frequently performed surgical procedure in the world. The increase in IOL designs has not been paralleled in practice by a sophistication in IOL selection methods, which rely on limited anatomical measurements of the eye and the surgeon's interpretation of the patient's needs and expectations. We propose that the future of IOL selection will be guided by 3D quantitative imaging of the crystalline lens to map lens opacities, anticipate IOL position, and develop fully customized eye models for ray-tracing-based IOL selection. Conversely, visual simulators (in which IOL designs are programmed in active elements) allow patients to experience prospective vision before surgery and to make more informed decisions about which IOL to choose. Quantitative imaging and optical and visual simulations of postsurgery outcomes will allow optimal treatments to be selected for a patient undergoing modern cataract surgery.

To compare on-axis measurements of the axial length with off-axis measurements in the paracentral horizontal and vertical positions

Purpose: To compare on-axis measurements of the axial length (AL) with off-axis measurements in the paracentral horizontal and vertical positions using the Lenstar LS 900 biometer.Methods: In this, the samples were selected from patients scheduled for cataract surgery using a systematic randomization method. After applying the exclusion criteria, all subjects underwent optometric examinations and AL measurement using the Lenstar. Five consecutive, non-cycloplegic measurements were done on the right eye centrally, 10° temporally, 10° nasally, 10° superiorly and 10° inferiorly on the retina by the same examiner.Results: Two hundred and seven eyes were examined in this study, of which 126 (60%) were for female patients. The mean age of the participants was 64.32 ± 10.77 years (range: 34-91 years). The mean central, superior, inferior, temporal, and nasal axial AL was 23.22 ± 1.02, 23.21 ± 1.02, 23.21 ± 1.02, 23.21 ± 1.02, 23.20 ± 1.03, respectively. Comparison of these readings using repeated measures ANOVA showed a statistically significant difference in the AL value among these positions. According to the post-hoc results, superior and nasal AL was statistically significantly lower compared to the central AL.Conclusion: If on-axis biometry is not available, AL can be measured in an off-axis manner in the paracentral temporal, superior and inferior positions. Considering the marked difference in AL measurement between central and nasal positions, off-axis measurement is not recommended in the nasal part because it may be associated with a marked hyperopic shift after cataract surgery.

Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Without Corneal Parameters: A New Option

OBJECTIVES

To compare different methods in calculating the corneal radius (R) to be used in case of intraocular lens power calculations when it is immeasurable.

METHODS

The right eyes of 1,960 patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. The first group of right eyes (group A) was divided in three groups according to the axial length (AL) (≤21.99 mm, between 22 and 24.99 mm, and ≥25 mm). In these groups, the correlation between the AL and the corneal radius (R) provided three different regression formulas. The second group of right eyes (group B) was used to test the following methods of estimating the R: the regression formulas determined from group A, formula from Logan et al., formula from Stenström, the mean R calculated from group A, and the fellow eye group B. A Student paired T test was used for the statistical evaluation.

RESULTS

In case of AL≤21.99, the best results have been obtained with the fellow eye R, followed by either the regression formula or the mean R from group A (mean=0.00±0.09 mm, P=0.94, mean=0.05±0.21 mm, P=0.05, mean=0.05±0.22 mm, P=0.08, respectively). In case of AL between 22 and 24.99 mm, the best results have been obtained with the fellow eye R, followed by either the regression formula or the mean R from group A (mean=-0.01±0.09 mm, P=0.38, mean=0.01±0.21 mm, P=0.12, mean=0.01±0.24 mm, P=0.18, respectively). In case of AL≥25 mm, the best results have been obtained with the fellow eye R, followed by either the regression formula or the mean R from group A (mean=-0.003±0.08 mm, P=0.94 mean=-0.004±0.25 mm, P=0.85, mean=-0.004±0.25 mm, P=0.85, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The new calculated regression formulas seem to represent a reliable method to calculate the R when it is undetectable, as in case of corneal dystrophies.

Orbscan 3 Versus Pentacam HR: Evaluating the Possible Interchangeable Use of Various Parameters

PURPOSE

Many topography/tomography devices are available, and their interchangeable use is frequently questioned. This study aimed to compare the analogous indices of Orbscan 3 and Pentacam HR to detect whether the interchangeable use of the 2 devices is feasible.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at Eye World Hospital, Giza, Egypt. Displays of Orbscan 3 (Bausch & Lomb; Technolas Perfect Vision GmbH) and Pentacam HR (Oculus Optikegrate) for 660 healthy right eyes were explored for various analogous indices. Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used for comparisons.

RESULTS

The highest systematic error and lowest agreement existed in the front and back elevations from the best fit sphere (mean differences of 4.7 and 9.2 μm, respectively, and 95% LoA of -2.5 to 12.0 and -10.0 to 28.6, respectively). There was a relatively wide 95% LoA for each pachymetry at the corneal apex (-18 to 22 μm) and at the thinnest location (-22 to 22 μm), anterior chamber depth (-0.88 to 0.95 mm), flattest keratometry (-0.44 to 0.62 D), and steepest keratometry (-0.71 to 0.89 D). By contrast, the lowest systematic error and highest agreement existed for front and back best fit sphere radii of curvature (mean difference of 0.08 mm and 95% LoA of -0.08 to 0.24 and mean difference of 0.03 mm and 95% LoA of -0.17 to 0.23, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study negates the accuracy of the use of devices interchangeably regarding most parameters. Therefore, examinations with the 2 devices should not be regarded comparable.

Ocular biometry through fully refocused steady-state magnetic resonance imaging sequence: reliability and agreement with the IOLMaster® 500

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability and agreement between Fully Refocused Steady-State magnetic resonance sequences (FRSS) and the IOLMaster^® 500 optical biometer for measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL).

METHODS

In a sample of 32 healthy volunteers, separate observers measured the ACD and AL of both eyes using both techniques (inter-method) and through repeated FRSS measurements (interobserver) and by the same observer (intraobserver). We employed the Bland-Altman method to determine the agreement between FRSS and partial coherence interferometry (using the IOLMaster^®) and the interobserver and intraobserver variability, providing the limits of agreement (LoA, or mean difference ± 1.96 SD). Correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients were also provided.

RESULTS

For ACD measurements with FRSS in pseudo-color scale, we obtained an LoA of 0.016 ± 0.266 mm compared with partial coherence interferometry. For AL with FRSS in greyscale, the LoA was 0.019 ± 0.383 mm. Maximum interobserver variability showed a  - 0.036 ± 0.247 mm LoA for ACD with FRSS in pseudo-color scale. Maximum intraobserver variability was 0.000 ± 0.157 mm LoA for AL with FRSS in greyscale.

CONCLUSIONS

ACD and AL measurements using FRSS sequencing present high LoA and reliability when compared with partial coherence interferometry using the IOLMaster^® 500. The results were better for FRSS in pseudo-color scale in ACD determination and for FRSS in greyscale in AL determination. FRSS would not be recommended for IOL power calculation due to variability of AL measurement.

Biometric refractive error after cataract and retina surgery: a systematic review and a benchmark proposal

PURPOSE

To systematically review studies on refractive error after phacovitrectomy and phacoemulsification and to investigate factors associated with larger error.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was performed using PUBMED and EMBASE until May 2020. The articles were included in the study if they reported data about refractive error as the difference in spherical equivalent between actual vs. target refraction in patients who underwent phacovitrectomy and phacoemulsification according to the type of biometry (ultrasound or optical). An inverse variance meta-analysis technique was used to pool errors; standard deviations (SDs), which are an expression of random error, were reported descriptively as median and range of the 95% coefficient of reproducibility (95% CR: 1.96 SD).

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (197,353 eyes) were included. The mean error obtained using optical biometry was negligible for phacoemulsification (0.04 D, 95% CI: -0.04 to 0.12; 8 studies, 587 eyes) and was consistent with larger datasets using mixed biometric methods (0.02, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.04; 5 studies, 194,522 eyes). A trend towards hyperopia was found with ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification (+0.21 D, 0.00-0.42 D; 7 studies, 394 eyes). Mean error after phacovitrectomy was clinically insignificant with optical biometry (-0.10 D, -0.22 to 0.02;, 8 studies, 453 eyes), and) and a mild myopic shift was possible with ultrasound biometry (-0.39 D, 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.09 D; 6 studies, 529 eyes). The 95% CR was greater and more variable with ultrasound biometry in patients who underwent phacovitrectomy (median 1.75 D, range 0.47-2.5) while it was consistent and lower with optical biometry in patients who underwent phacoemulsification (median 0.96 D, range 0.60-1.2]).

CONCLUSIONS

Phacovitrectomy causes a mild myopic shift compared to phacoemulsification, which is clinically relevant only with ultrasound biometry. Furthermore, our review provides estimates of fixed and random error for postoperative vs. target spherical equivalent as a continuous variable, that is easy to use as benchmark for quality assurance.

The Effect of Lifitegrast on Refractive Accuracy and Symptoms in Dry Eye Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To determine the effect of lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% on improving the tear film, biometry/keratometry, and refractive accuracy for dry eye patients scheduled for cataract surgery.

Patients and Methods

Multicenter, prospective, open-label study of 100 eyes of 100 patients undergoing cataract surgery who had a confirmed diagnosis of dry eye. Patients underwent biometry at baseline and again after a 28-day course of lifitegrast 5% BID. Primary outcome was an improvement in the accuracy of preoperative anterior corneal power measurements at predicting postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) pre- and post-lifitegrast treatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in dry eye symptoms and corneal staining.

Results

The accuracy of the biometry readings for the achieved refractive SE: within 0.25 D in 47% and 50% of eyes before and after the initial lifitegrast treatment, respectively; within 0.5 D in 71% and 79% of eyes before and after the initial lifitegrast treatment; and within 0.75 D in 81% and 91% of eyes before and after the initial lifitegrast treatment (p < 0.04).

Conclusion

Lifitegrast 5% significantly improved preoperative corneal surface measurement accuracy in patients with confirmed dry eye who were scheduled for cataract surgery.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/uSDGfO8JGAc

Inter-ocular and inter-visit differences in ocular biometry and refractive outcomes after cataract surgery

This study aimed to determine whether inter-ocular differences in axial length (AL), corneal power (K), and adjusted emmetropic intraocular lens power (EIOLP) and inter-visit differences in these ocular biometric values, measured on different days, are related to refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 279 patients who underwent phacoemulsification. Patients underwent ocular biometry twice (1–4 weeks before and on the day of surgery). Patients were divided into three groups: group S (similar inter-ocular biometry in different measurements; n = 201), group P (inter-ocular differences persisted in the second measurement; n = 37), and group D (inter-ocular difference diminished in the second measurement; n = 41). Postoperative refractive outcomes (mean absolute errors [MAEs]) were compared among the groups. Postoperative MAE2, based on second measurement with reduced inter-ocular biometry difference, was smaller than that calculated using the first measurement (MAE1) with borderline significance in group D (MAE1, 0.49 ± 0.45 diopters vs. MAE2, 0.41 ± 0.33 diopters, p = 0.062). Postoperative MAE2 was greater in group P compared to the other two groups (p = 0.034). Large inter-ocular biometry differences were associated with poor refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. These results indicate that measurements with smaller inter-ocular differences were associated with better refractive outcomes in cases with inter-visit biometry differences.

Comparison of a new anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Oculus Pentacam for measurement of anterior chamber depth and corneal thickness

Background

Accurate measurements of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and regional corneal thickness are especially important for the diagnosis and treatment of many ocular disease. This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of a new swept source anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and its agreement with Oculus Pentacam for measurements of ACD and corneal thickness (CT).

Methods

The central corneal thickness (CCT), superior corneal thickness (SCT), inferior corneal thickness (ICT), nasal corneal thickness (NCT), temporal corneal thickness (TCT) and ACD of the right eye from forty-nine adults aged 18 to 36 years (24.78±4.36 years old) were measured with Pentacam and AS-OCT (CASIA2). All subjects were measured twice with each device. The repeatability was determined using the coefficient of repeatability (COR), the relative COR and the limits of agreement (LOA). Bland-Altman plot was also used for evaluating the agreement between parameters from the two devices.

Results

For the repeatability of CASIA2, the COR of the two measurements of ACD, CCT, SCT, ICT, NCT and TCT was 0.31 mm, 18.58, 25.83, 28.32, 26.71 and 22.09 µm respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the CT and ACD measurements by CASIA2 (P>0.05). For measurements with Pentacam and CASIA2, the COR of ACD, CCT, SCT, NCT, ICT and TCT was 0.294 mm, 13.10, 51.57, 48.06, 56.21 and 47.69 µm respectively. No significant differences were found between the values measured by CAISA2 and Pentacam for CT and ACD (P>0.05). The Bland-Altman analysis also suggested high consistency between measurements obtained by Pentacam and CASIA2.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that Pentacam and CASIA2 have good agreement in CT and ACD measurements. The two devices can be considered interchangeable for these parameters' measurements in healthy subjects when monitoring corneal conditions or planning ocular surgery. However, subtle differences between CASIA2 and Pentacam should also be kept in mind for certain specific clinical or research purposes.

Ocular Findings Associated with Hypoparathyroidism

Purpose: To determine the corneal and retinal changes associated with serum calcium, phosphorus and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in patients with hypoparathyroidism.Methods: Patients who were under follow-up for hypoparathyroidism in the endocrinology department were included in the study. All participants underwent a complete ophthalmological examination. Moreover, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness were recorded. Serum biochemical parameters were recorded.Results: In a total of 75 patients (35 in the hypoparathyroidism group and 40 in the healthy control group) were included in this study. Central corneal thickness (519.95 ± 33.21 vs. 539.10 ± 32.96, p: 0.001) and RNFL (105.10 ± 11.89 vs. 113.56 ± 9.54, p: 0.005) were significantly thinner and ACD was significantly deeper in the hypoparathyroidism group.Conclusion: We determined thinner CCT and RNFL values in patients with hypoparathyroidism related to serum calcium levels together with a significant deepness in ACD.

Accuracy and feasibility of axial length measurements by a new optical low-coherence reflectometry-based device in eyes with posterior subcapsular cataract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of measuring axial length (AL) by a new optical low-coherence reflectometry (OLCR)-based device in eyes with central posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of patients who had uneventful cataract surgery and whose preoperative AL measurements were not feasible with the partial coherence interferometry (PCI) device because of a central PSC were assessed. Preoperative AL was measured by the OLCR device and immersion ultrasound (US). Preoperative results were compared with the postoperative AL measurements obtained by the PCI.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients (27 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The median difference between the OLCR and the PCI AL measurements (0.07 mm) was lower than the median difference between the US and the PCI AL measurements (0.13 mm) (P = .016). The ranges of the limits of agreement were 0.15 mm between OLCR and PCI, and 0.88 mm between US and PCI. The proportion of eyes with an AL difference of less than 0.1 mm was significantly higher between the OLCR and the PCI devices (24 eyes [88.9%]) than between the US and the PCI devices (9 eyes [33.3%]) (P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The OLCR-based device successfully measured the preoperative AL in all eyes with central PSC for which preoperative PCI scans were not feasible. These measurements had a high level of agreement with the postoperative AL measurements obtained by the PCI device.

Comparison of ocular parameters of two biometric measurement devices in highly myopic eyes

AIM

To compare the differences and agreement of ocular biometric parameters in highly myopic eyes obtained by optical biometric measurement instruments, the OA-2000 and IOLMaster 500.

METHODS

Totally, 90 patients (90 eyes) were included. They were divided into high myopia group and control group. Ocular parameters, including axial length (AL), mean keratometry (Km), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and white to white (WTW), were obtained from the OA-2000 and IOLMaster 500.

RESULTS

For the control group, we applied Bland-Altman graphs to assess the 95% limits of agreement (LoA) for most parameters including AL, ACD, Km, and WTW (-0.24 to 0.29 mm, -0.22 to 0.45 mm, -0.39 to 0.31 D, and -0.90 to 0.86 mm, respectively). In high myopia patients, AL, ACD, Km values had wider 95% LoA (-0.34 to 0.32 mm, -0.36 to 0.34 mm, -0.57 to 0.47 D, respectively), except WTW (-0.80 to 0.68 mm). Differences were not statistically significant between these two instruments (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Most parameters obtained by the OA-2000 and IOLMaster 500 are comparable, including the AL, ACD, and K values. Among them, the agreement of the high myopia patients is poor compared to the patients without high myopia.

Effect of anterior chamber depth on predictive accuracy of seven intraocular lens formulas in eyes with axial length less than 22 mm

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate whether different anterior chamber depth (ACD) affects the predictive accuracy of intraocular lens formulas in eyes with axial length (AL) less than 22 mm.

Methods

Eighty-five eyes of 85 patients with AL less than 22 mm were included in this retrospective study, which were divided into three groups: Group 1, ACD less than 2.4 mm; Group 2, ACD between 2.4 and 2.9 mm; and Group 3, ACD greater than 2.9 mm. Optical biometry with partial coherence interferometry was performed in all cases. The median absolute error (MedAE) was compared by Friedman’s test, using the optimized lens constant, among seven formulas (Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hill-RBF, Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T) in each group.

Results

Friedman’s test showed no significant difference in MedAE among all formulas in Groups 1 and 3. However, as the Haigis formula had the highest MedAE and lowest percentage of eyes within ±0.25 Diopter, it is least preferred in Group 1. On the contrary, in Group 3 it fared the best, having the least MedAE and highest percentage of eyes within ±0.25 Diopter. In Group 2, Friedman’s test gave significant difference, and post-hoc analysis showed statistical superiority of Haigis over the Holladay 1 (p=0.02), Holladay 2 (p=0.01), Hill-RBF (p=0.04), and SRK/T (p=0.02) formulas. However, there was no statistical difference between the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, and Hoffer Q formulas.

Conclusion

Considering the ACD in eyes with AL less than 22 mm, Haigis is the preferred formula while SRK/T proved to be the worst formula in Groups 2 and 3.

Intraobserver Repeatability of Corneal and Anterior Segment Parameters Obtained Using a Scheimpflug Camera-Placido Corneal Topography System

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to assess the intraobserver repeatability of central corneal thickness, peripheral corneal thickness (PCT), keratometry values (steep K, flat K), white-to-white diameter, and anterior chamber depth using the Sirius topography device (Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici, Florence, Italy) in healthy eyes.

Methods:

A Sirius device was used by a single examiner to assess 100 eyes in 50 healthy patients. Two consecutive scans were acquired for each eye. Repeatability was assessed using test–retest variability, the coefficient of variation (COV), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results:

Fifty patients (100 eyes) met the inclusion criteria. There were 18 women (36%) and 32 men (64%), with an age range of 23 to 56 years. The mean age was 30.38±8.03 years. A COV of 0.4% or less and an ICC of more than 0.99 (showing excellent repeatability) were achieved for most parameters, with the exception of PCT (at 2.5-mm temporal, superior, inferior, and nasal thickness).

Conclusion:

The anterior segment parameters obtained using the Sirius Scheimpflug camera- Placido corneal topography system were highly repeatable.

Improved Refractive Outcomes of Small-Incision Extracapsular Cataract Surgery after Implementation of a Biometry Training Course

PURPOSE:

To determine whether a biometry training course could improve refractive outcomes of patients undergoing manual small-incision extracapsular cataract surgery (SICS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

This was a prospective, interventional, cohort study at the Pacific Eye Institute, Fiji. SICS refractive outcomes were evaluated before and after a structured biometry teaching course. Eyes that underwent evaluation and subsequent SICS with placement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) were included. Axial length measurements were obtained using A-scan applanation ultrasound and keratometry with a handheld keratometer. Main outcome measures included mean absolute prediction error of IOL calculations, percentage of eyes within ±0.5 D and ±1.0 D of intended spherical equivalent, and proportion of eyes with ≥6/18 uncorrected visual acuity.

RESULTS:

A total of 240 eyes were analyzed: 120 eyes before and 120 eyes after the structured biometry training. The mean absolute prediction error was 50% lower following the training (1.13 ± 0.84 D pre vs. 0.56 ± 0.44 D post; P < 0.001). A higher percentage of the eyes had a postoperative spherical equivalent within ±0.5 D (26.7% pre vs. 52.5% post; P < 0.001) and ±1.0 D (55.0% pre vs. 90.0% post; P < 0.001) of the intended target. A higher proportion of the eyes achieved ≥6/18 uncorrected visual acuity (77.5% pre vs. 91.7% post, P = 0.004), while the proportion with ≥6/18 corrected visual acuity was similar (94.4% pre vs. 98.3% post; P = 0.28).

CONCLUSIONS:

A structured biometry training course may improve the accuracy of preoperative IOL calculations to achieve the postoperative refractive target. Ophthalmology training programs should include structured biometry teaching in their curricula.

Wide-field whole eye OCT system with demonstration of quantitative retinal curvature estimation

Current conventional clinical OCT systems image either only the anterior or the posterior eye during a single acquisition. This localized imaging limits conventional OCT's use for characterizing global ocular morphometry and biometry, which requires knowledge of spatial relationships across the entire eye. We developed a "whole eye" optical coherence tomography system that simultaneously acquires volumes with a wide field-of-view for both the anterior chamber (14 x 14 mm) and retina (55°) using a single source and detector. This system was used to measure retinal curvature in a pilot population and compared against curvature of the same eyes measured with magnetic resonance imaging.