1
|
Fumagalli D, De Vitis LA, Caruso G, Occhiali T, Palmieri E, Guillot BE, Pappalettera G, Langstraat CL, Glaser GE, Reynolds EA, Fruscio R, Landoni F, Mariani A, Grassi T. Low-Volume Metastases in Apparent Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Prevalence, Clinical Significance, and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1338. [PMID: 38611016 PMCID: PMC11011093 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most diagnosed gynecologic malignancy, and its incidence and mortality are increasing. The prognosis is highly dependent on the disease spread. Surgical staging includes retroperitoneal evaluation to detect potential lymph node metastases. In recent years, systematic lymphadenectomy has been replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and ultrastaging, allowing for the detection of macrometastases, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells (ITCs). Micrometastases and ITCs have been grouped as low-volume metastases (LVM). The reported prevalence of LVM in studies enrolling more than one thousand patients with apparent early-stage EC ranges from 1.9% to 10.2%. Different rates of LVM are observed when patients are stratified according to disease characteristics and their risk of recurrence. Patients with EC at low risk for recurrence have low rates of LVM, while intermediate- and high-risk patients have a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with nodal metastases, including LVM. Macro- and micrometastases increase the risk of recurrence and cause upstaging, while the clinical significance of ITCs is still uncertain. A recent meta-analysis found that patients with LVM have a higher relative risk of recurrence [1.34 (95% CI: 1.07-1.67)], regardless of adjuvant treatment. In a retrospective study on patients with low-risk EC and no adjuvant treatment, those with ITCs had worse recurrence-free survival compared to node-negative patients (85.1%; CI 95% 73.8-98.2 versus 90.2%; CI 95% 84.9-95.8). However, a difference was no longer observed after the exclusion of cases with lymphovascular space invasion. There is no consensus on adjuvant treatment in ITC patients at otherwise low risk, and their recurrence rate is low. Multi-institutional, prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the clinical significance of ITCs in low-risk patients. Further stratification of patients, considering histopathological and molecular features of the disease, may clarify the role of LVM and especially ITCs in specific contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Fumagalli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
| | - Luigi A. De Vitis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Occhiali
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Emilia Palmieri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Women, Children and Public Health Sciences, , Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, 00136 Roma, Italy
| | - Benedetto E. Guillot
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Pappalettera
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
- Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO) IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carrie L. Langstraat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Gretchen E. Glaser
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Evelyn A. Reynolds
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA; (D.F.); (L.A.D.V.); (G.C.); (T.O.); (E.P.); (B.E.G.); (G.P.); (C.L.L.); (G.E.G.); (E.A.R.); (A.M.)
| | - Tommaso Grassi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; (R.F.); (F.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cabrera S, Gómez-Hidalgo NR, García-Pineda V, Bebia V, Fernández-González S, Alonso P, Rodríguez-Gómez T, Fusté P, Gracia-Segovia M, Lorenzo C, Chacon E, Roldan Rivas F, Arencibia O, Martí Edo M, Fidalgo S, Sanchis J, Padilla-Iserte P, Pantoja-Garrido M, Martínez S, Peiró R, Escayola C, Oliver-Pérez MR, Aghababyan C, Tauste C, Morales S, Torrent A, Utrilla-Layna J, Fargas F, Calvo A, Aller de Pace L, Gil-Moreno A. Accuracy and Survival Outcomes after National Implementation of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Stage Endometrial Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:7653-7662. [PMID: 37633852 PMCID: PMC10562309 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14065-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has recently been accepted to evaluate nodal status in endometrial cancer at early stage, which is key to tailoring adjuvant treatments. Our aim was to evaluate the national implementation of SLN biopsy in terms of accuracy to detect nodal disease in a clinical setting and oncologic outcomes according to the volume of nodal disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 29 Spanish centers participated in this retrospective, multicenter registry including patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma at preoperative early stage who had undergone SLN biopsy between 2015 and 2021. Each center collected data regarding demographic, clinical, histologic, therapeutic, and survival characteristics. RESULTS A total of 892 patients were enrolled. After the surgery, 12.9% were suprastaged to FIGO 2009 stages III-IV and 108 patients (12.1%) had nodal involvement: 54.6% macrometastasis, 22.2% micrometastases, and 23.1% isolated tumor cells (ITC). Sensitivity of SLN biopsy was 93.7% and false negative rate was 6.2%. After a median follow up of 1.81 years, overall surivial and disease-free survival were significantly lower in patients who had macrometastases when compared with patients with negative nodes, micrometastases or ITC. CONCLUSIONS In our nationwide cohort we obtained high sensitivity of SLN biopsy to detect nodal disease. The oncologic outcomes of patients with negative nodes and low-volume disease were similar after tailoring adjuvant treatments. In total, 22% of patients with macrometastasis and 50% of patients with micrometastasis were at low risk of nodal metastasis according to their preoperative risk factors, revealing the importance of SLN biopsy in the surgical management of patients with early stage EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Cabrera
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Natalia R Gómez-Hidalgo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Vicente Bebia
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Paula Alonso
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tomás Rodríguez-Gómez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - Pere Fusté
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Clínic i Provincial de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Lorenzo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Tenerife, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Roldan Rivas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Octavio Arencibia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Gran Canarias Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas, Spain
| | - Marina Martí Edo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario de Ciudad Real, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Soledad Fidalgo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Josep Sanchis
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (IVO), Valencia, Spain
| | - Pablo Padilla-Iserte
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Politécnico Universitario La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Manuel Pantoja-Garrido
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Sergio Martínez
- Department of Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Ricard Peiró
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cecilia Escayola
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, El Pilar Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Reyes Oliver-Pérez
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 12 de Octubre Research Institute (i+12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Aghababyan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carmen Tauste
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Sara Morales
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - Anna Torrent
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
| | - Jesus Utrilla-Layna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fundación Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Francesc Fargas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Quirón Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Calvo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
| | - Laura Aller de Pace
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
| | - Antonio Gil-Moreno
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burg LC, Verheijen S, Bekkers RLM, IntHout J, Holloway RW, Taskin S, Ferguson SE, Xue Y, Ditto A, Baiocchi G, Papadia A, Bogani G, Buda A, Kruitwagen RFPM, Zusterzeel PLM. The added value of SLN mapping with indocyanine green in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer management: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gynecol Oncol 2022; 33:e66. [PMID: 35882605 PMCID: PMC9428296 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the SLN detection rate in presumed early stage, low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers, the incidence of SLN metastases, and the negative predictive value of SLN mapping performed with indocyanine green (ICG). METHODS A systematic review with meta-analyses was conducted. Study inclusion criteria were A) low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer, B) the use of ICG per cervical injection; C) a minimum of twenty included patients per study. To assess the negative predictive value of SLN mapping, D) a subsequent lymphadenectomy was an additional inclusion criterion. RESULTS Fourteen studies were selected, involving 2,117 patients. The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 95.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]=92.4%-97.9%) and 76.5% (95% CI=68.1%-84.0%), respectively. The incidence of SLN metastases was 9.6% (95% CI=5.1%-15.2%) in patients with grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 11.8% (95% CI=8.1%-16.1%) in patients with grade 1-3 endometrial cancer. The negative predictive value of SLN mapping was 100% (95% CI=98.8%-100%) in studies that included grade 1-2 endometrial cancer and 99.2% (95% CI=97.9%-99.9%) in studies that also included grade 3. CONCLUSION SLN mapping with ICG is feasible with a high detection rate and negative predictive value in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancers. Given the incidence of SLN metastases is approximately 10% in those patients, SLN mapping may lead to stage shifting with potential therapeutic consequences. Given the high negative predictive value with SLN mapping, routine lymphadenectomy should be omitted in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara C Burg
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Shenna Verheijen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ruud L M Bekkers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Department for Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert W Holloway
- Gynecologic Oncology Program, AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Salih Taskin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sarah E Ferguson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Yu Xue
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Antonino Ditto
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Glauco Baiocchi
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Andrea Papadia
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano EOC, Lugano, Switzerland.,Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urologynecological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Ospedale San Gerardo di Monza, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza, Italy.,Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno (cuneo), Italy
| | - Roy F P M Kruitwagen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Petra L M Zusterzeel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsuo K, Klar M, Khetan VU, Violette CJ, Youssefzadeh AC, Yessaian AA, Roman LD. Association between sentinel lymph node biopsy and micrometastasis in endometrial cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 275:91-96. [PMID: 35763967 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is increasingly utilized at surgical staging for early endometrial cancer. This study examined the association between SLN biopsy and micrometastasis in endometrial cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study examining the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program. The study population was 6,414 women with T1-2 endometrial cancer who underwent primary hysterectomy and surgical nodal evaluation. Exclusion criteria included cases with isolated tumor cells. Exposure assignment was surgical nodal evaluation (SLN biopsy or lymphadenectomy). Main outcome measure was micrometastasis, assessed by inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score in a stage-specific fashion. RESULTS In T1a disease (n = 4,608), SLN biopsy was performed in 1,164 (25.3%) cases. SLN biopsy was associated with a 90% increased likeliness of identifying micrometastasis compared to lymphadenectomy (1.3% versus 0.7%, odds ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.55, P = 0.040). In T1b disease (n = 1,369), 270 (19.7%) cases had SLN biopsy. The incidence of micrometastasis was significantly higher in the SLN biopsy group compared to the lymphadenectomy group (8.4% versus 5.0%, odds ratio 1.74, 95% confidence interval 1.06-2.86, P = 0.028). In T2 disease (SLN biopsy in 57 [13.0%] of 437 cases), the incidence of micrometastasis was similar between the two groups (7.9% versus 7.0%, odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.30-2.60, P = 0.818). CONCLUSION This study suggests that SLN biopsy protocol may identify more micrometastasis in the regional lymph nodes of T1 endometrial cancer. Whether national-level increase in the utilization of SLN biopsy for early endometrial cancer results in a stage-shifting to advanced disease on a population-basis warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Varun U Khetan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Caroline J Violette
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ariane C Youssefzadeh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Annie A Yessaian
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gill SE, Garzon S, Multinu F, Hokenstad AN, Casarin J, Cappuccio S, McGree ME, Weaver AL, Cliby WA, Keeney GL, Mariani A. Ultrastaging of 'negative' pelvic lymph nodes in patients with low- and intermediate-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer who developed non-vaginal recurrences. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1541-1548. [PMID: 34706876 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evidence on micrometastases and isolated tumor cells as factors associated with non-vaginal recurrence in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer is limited. The goal of our study was to investigate risk factors for non-vaginal recurrence in low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS Records of all patients with endometrial cancer surgically managed at the Mayo Clinic before sentinel lymph node implementation (1999-2008) were reviewed. We identified all patients with endometrioid low-risk (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, grade 1 or 2 with myometrial invasion <50% and negative peritoneal cytology) or intermediate-risk (FIGO stage I, grade 1 or 2 with myometrial invasion ≥50% or grade 3 with myometrial invasion <50% and negative peritoneal cytology) endometrial cancer at definitive pathology after pelvic and para-aortic lymph node assessment. All pelvic lymph nodes of patients with non-vaginal recurrence (any recurrence excluding isolated vaginal cuff recurrences) underwent ultrastaging. RESULTS Among 1303 women, we identified 321 patients with low-risk (n=236) or intermediate-risk (n=85) endometrial cancer (median age 65.4 years; 266 (82.9%) stage IA; 55 (17.1%) stage IB). Of the total of 321, 13 patients developed non-vaginal recurrence (Kaplan-Meier rate 4.7% by 60 months; 95% CI 2.1% to 7.2%): 11 hematogenous/peritoneal and two para-aortic and distant lymphatic. Myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion were univariately associated with non-vaginal recurrence. In these patients, the original hematoxylin/eosin slides review confirmed all 646 pelvic and para-aortic removed lymph nodes as negative. The ultrastaging of 463 pelvic lymph nodes did not identify any occult metastases (prevalence 0%; 95% CI 0% to 22.8% considering 13 patients; 95% CI 0% to 0.8% considering 463 pelvic lymph nodes). CONCLUSION There were no occult metastases in pelvic lymph nodes of patients with low- or intermediate-risk endometrial cancer with non-vaginal recurrence. Myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion appear to be associated with non-vaginal recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Gill
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Nancy N and J C Lewis Cancer and Research Pavilion, Savannah, Georgia, USA
| | - Simone Garzon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Multinu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexis N Hokenstad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Billings Clinic Cancer Center, Billings, Montana, USA
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, "Filippo Del Ponte" Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Serena Cappuccio
- Department of Woman's, Child's and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Michaela E McGree
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amy L Weaver
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William A Cliby
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gary L Keeney
- Division of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghoniem K, Larish AM, Dinoi G, Zhou XC, Alhilli M, Wallace S, Wohlmuth C, Baiocchi G, Tokgozoglu N, Raspagliesi F, Buda A, Zanagnolo V, Zapardiel I, Jagasia N, Giuntoli R, Glickman A, Peiretti M, Lanner M, Chacon E, Di Guilmi J, Pereira A, Laas E, Fishman A, Nitschmann CC, Parker S, Joehlin-Price A, Lees B, Covens A, De Brot L, Taskiran C, Bogani G, Paniga C, Multinu F, Hernandez-Gutierrez A, Weaver AL, McGree ME, Mariani A. Oncologic outcomes of endometrial cancer in patients with low-volume metastasis in the sentinel lymph nodes: An international multi-institutional study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 162:590-598. [PMID: 34274133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess oncologic outcomes in endometrial cancer patients with low-volume metastasis (LVM) in the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). METHODS Patients with endometrial cancer and SLN-LVM (≤2 mm) from December 3, 2009, to December 31, 2018, were retrospectively identified from 22 centers worldwide. Patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV, adnexal involvement, or unknown adjuvant therapy (ATx) were excluded. RESULTS Of 247 patients included, 132 had isolated tumor cell (ITC) and 115 had micrometastasis (MM). Overall 4-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was 77.6% (95% CI, 70.2%-85.9%); median follow-up for patients without recurrence was 29.6 (interquartile range, 19.2-41.5) months. At multivariate analysis, Non-endometrioid (NE) (HR, 5.00; 95% CI, 2.50-9.99; P < .001), lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.45-7.31; P = .004), and uterine serosal invasion (USI) (HR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.44-9.54; P = .007) were independent predictors of recurrence. Among 47 endometrioid ITC patients without ATx, 4-year RFS was 82.6% (95% CI, 70.1%-97.2). Considering 18 ITC patients with endometrioid grade 1 disease, without LVSI, USI, or ATx, only 1 had recurrence (median follow-up, 24.8 months). CONCLUSIONS In patients with SLN-LVM, NE, LVSI, and USI were independent risk factors for recurrence. Patients with any risk factor had poor prognosis, even when receiving ATx. Patients with ITC and grade 1 endometrioid disease (no LVSI/USI) had favorable prognosis, even without ATx. Further analysis (with more patients and longer follow-up) is needed to assess whether ATx can be withheld in this low-risk subgroup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khaled Ghoniem
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alyssa M Larish
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Giorgia Dinoi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | - Sumer Wallace
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Christoph Wohlmuth
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Nisha Jagasia
- Mater Hospital Brisbane & Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Robert Giuntoli
- University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Augusto Pereira
- Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ami Fishman
- Meir Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Brittany Lees
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Allan Covens
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Cagatay Taskiran
- Turkish Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori -Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Multinu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Amy L Weaver
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Michaela E McGree
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nagar H, Wietek N, Goodall RJ, Hughes W, Schmidt-Hansen M, Morrison J. Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 6:CD013021. [PMID: 34106467 PMCID: PMC8189170 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013021.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelvic lymphadenectomy provides prognostic information for those diagnosed with endometrial (womb) cancer and provides information that may influence decisions regarding adjuvant treatment. However, studies have not shown a therapeutic benefit, and lymphadenectomy causes significant morbidity. The technique of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), allows the first draining node from a cancer to be identified and examined histologically for involvement with cancer cells. SLNB is commonly used in other cancers, including breast and vulval cancer. Different tracers, including colloid labelled with radioactive technetium-99, blue dyes, e.g. patent or methylene blue, and near infra-red fluorescent dyes, e.g. indocyanine green (ICG), have been used singly or in combination for detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN). OBJECTIVES To assess the diagnostic accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the identification of pelvic lymph node involvement in women with endometrial cancer, presumed to be at an early stage prior to surgery, including consideration of the detection rate. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE (1946 to July 2019), Embase (1974 to July 2019) and the relevant Cochrane trial registers. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of tracers for SLN assessment (involving the identification of a SLN plus histological examination) against a reference standard of histological examination of removed pelvic +/- para-aortic lymph nodes following systematic pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PLND/PPALND) in women with endometrial cancer, where there were sufficient data for the construction of two-by-two tables. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors (a combination of HN, JM, NW, RG, and WH) independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance, classified studies for inclusion/exclusion and extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We calculated the detection rate as the arithmetic mean of the total number of SLNs detected out of the total number of women included in the included studies with the woman as the unit of analysis, used univariate meta-analytical methods to estimate pooled sensitivity estimates, and summarised the results using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS The search revealed 6259 unique records after removal of duplicates. After screening 232 studies in full text, we found 73 potentially includable records (for 52 studies), although we were only able to extract 2x2 table data for 33 studies, including 2237 women (46 records) for inclusion in the review, despite writing to trial authors for additional information. We found 11 studies that analysed results for blue dye alone, four studies for technetium-99m alone, 12 studies that used a combination of blue dye and technetium-99m, nine studies that used indocyanine green (ICG) and near infra-red immunofluorescence, and one study that used a combination of ICG and technetium-99m. Overall, the methodological reporting in most of the studies was poor, which resulted in a very large proportion of 'unclear risk of bias' ratings. Overall, the mean SLN detection rate was 86.9% (95% CI 82.9% to 90.8%; 2237 women; 33 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). In studies that reported bilateral detection the mean rate was 65.4% (95% CI 57.8% to 73.0%) . When considered according to which tracer was used, the SLN detection rate ranged from 77.8% (95% CI 70.0% to 85.6%) for blue dye alone (559 women; 11 studies; low-certainty evidence) to 100% for ICG and technetium-99m (32 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). The rates of positive lymph nodes ranged from 5.2% to 34.4% with a mean of 20.1% (95% CI 17.7% to 22.3%). The pooled sensitivity of SLNB was 91.8% (95% CI 86.5% to 95.1%; total 2237 women, of whom 409 had SLN involvement; moderate-certainty evidence). The sensitivity for of SLNB for the different tracers were: blue dye alone 95.2% (95% CI 77.2% to 99.2%; 559 women; 11 studies; low-certainty evidence); Technetium-99m alone 90.5% (95% CI 67.7% to 97.7%; 257 women; 4 studies; low-certainty evidence); technetium-99m and blue dye 91.9% (95% CI 74.4% to 97.8%; 548 women; 12 studies; low-certainty evidence); ICG alone 92.5% (95% CI 81.8% to 97.1%; 953 women; 9 studies; moderate-certainty evidence); ICG and blue dye 90.5% (95% CI 63.2.6% to 98.1%; 215 women; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence); and ICG and technetium-99m 100% (95% CI 63% to 100%; 32 women; 1 study; very low-certainty evidence). Meta-regression analyses found that the sensitivities did not differ between the different tracers used, between studies with a majority of women with FIGO stage 1A versus 1B or above; between studies assessing the pelvic lymph node basin alone versus the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node basin; or between studies that used subserosal alone versus subserosal and cervical injection. It should be noted that a false-positive result cannot occur, as the histological examination of the SLN is unchanged by the results from any additional nodes removed at systematic lymphadenectomy. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The diagnostic test accuracy for SLNB using either ICG alone or a combination of a dye (blue or ICG) and technetium-99m is probably good, with high sensitivity, where a SLN could be detected. Detection rates with ICG or a combination of dye (ICG or blue) and technetium-99m may be higher. The value of a SLNB approach in a treatment pathway, over adjuvant treatment decisions based on uterine factors and molecular profiling, requires examination in a high-quality intervention study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Nagar
- Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast City Hospital and the Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Nina Wietek
- Nuffield Department of Women's & Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard J Goodall
- Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Will Hughes
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mia Schmidt-Hansen
- National Guideline Alliance, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK
| | - Jo Morrison
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
García Pineda V, Hernández Gutiérrez A, Gracia Segovia M, Siegrist Ridruejo J, Diestro Tejeda MD, Zapardiel I. Low-Volume Nodal Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer: Risk Factors and Prognostic Significance. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061999. [PMID: 32630498 PMCID: PMC7356149 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the oncological outcomes of patients with low-volume metastasis compared to those with macrometastasis and negative nodes in endometrial cancer. Methods: A single institutional retrospective study was carried out, which included all patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgical treatment between January 2007 and December 2016. We analyzed the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients after sentinel node biopsy and full nodal surgical staging according to their final pathological nodal status, focusing on the impact of the size of nodal metastasis. Results: A total of 270 patients were operated on during the study period; among them, 230 (85.2%) patients underwent nodal staging. On final pathology, 196 (85.2%) patients had negative lymph nodes; low-volume metastasis (LVM) was present in 14 (6.1%) patients: 6 (2.6%) patients had isolated tumor cells (ITCs) and 8 (3.5%) patients presented just micrometastasis; additionally, 20 (8.7%) patients presented macrometastasis. After a median (range) follow-up of 60 (0-146) months, patients with macrometastasis showed a significantly worse PFS compared to LVM and node-negative patients (61.1% vs. 71.4% vs. 83.2%, respectively; p = 0.018), and similar results were obtained for 5-year OS (50% vs. 78.6% vs. 81.5%, respectively; p < 0.001). Half of the patients presenting LVM did not receive adjuvant treatment. Moreover, LVM had a moderate nonsignificant decrease in 5-year PFS compared to node-negative patients. Conclusions: Patients with endometrial cancer and low-volume nodal metastasis demonstrated a better prognosis than those presenting macrometastasis. Low-volume metastasis did not show worse oncological outcomes than node-negative patients, although there was a slight decrease in progression-free survival.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bogani G, Casarin J, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ditto A, Pinelli C, Dell'acqua A, Lopez S, Chiappa V, Brusadelli C, Guerrisi R, Ferrero S, Ghezzi F, Raspagliesi F. Survival outcomes in endometrial cancer patients having lymphadenectomy, sentinel node mapping followed by lymphadectomy and sentinel node mapping alone: Long-term results of a propensity-matched analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 158:77-83. [PMID: 32389376 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.04.691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Jvan Casarin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Antonino Ditto
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Ciro Pinelli
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy; Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
| | - Andrea Dell'acqua
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Lopez
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | | | - Claudia Brusadelli
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Rocco Guerrisi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Simone Ferrero
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Fabio Ghezzi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of the University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Di Meo ML, La Fera E, Dell'Orto F, Gioè A, Lamanna M, Ferrari D, De Ponti E, Perego P, Restaino S, Carlo R, Zannoni GF, Landoni F, Scambia G, Buda A. Standard ultra-staging compared to one-step nucleic acid amplification for the detection of sentinel lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients: a retrospective cohort comparison. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:372-377. [PMID: 31996396 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study was to compared standard ultra-staging (SU) with one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) for the detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in women with apparent uterine-confined endometrial cancer. METHODS All women underwent SLN identification with complete surgical staging. All SLNs were cut perpendicular to the long axis and two adjacent 5 µm sections were cut at each of two levels 50 µm apart. At each level, one slide was stained with hematoxylin and eosin and the other with immunohistochemistry using the AE1/AE3 anti-cytokeratin antibody, as well as one negative control slide for a total of five slides per block. For OSNA analysis, the 2 mm sections of the lymph nodes were homogenized to form a lysate. The lysate was then centrifuged and inserted into the RD 100i instrument where the isothermal amplification of CK19 mRNA was executed. RESULTS Of the 396 patients included in the retrospective analysis, 214 were in the SU group, and 182 in the OSNA group. Overall 869 SLNs were identified (490 SU, 379 OSNA). Sixty patients exhibited SLN metastasis (34 SU, 26 OSNA). Macrometastasis, micrometastases, and isolated tumor cells (ITC) were 5.1%, 4.1%, and 0.2%, respectively, in the US group, and 2.4%, 6.3%, and 0.1%, respectively, in the OSNA group (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS The OSNA assay detected a higher rate of micrometastasis and a lower rate of macrometastasis and ITC when compared with SU. The clinical and prognostic impact of ITC is debatable and controversial. Further studies are needed to clarify the respective roles of the OSNA and SU methods, and the possible role of ITC in the prognosis of patients with apparent early-stage endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Fanfani
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Giorgia Monterossi
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Letizia Di Meo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Federica Dell'Orto
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Maria Lamanna
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Debora Ferrari
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Elena De Ponti
- Gynecologic Pathology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Roma, Italy
| | - Patrizia Perego
- Department of Pathology, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Stefano Restaino
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Ronsini Carlo
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.,Department of Physical Medicine, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Fabio Landoni
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy .,Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASST-Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Oncologic impact of micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes of patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 22:1272-1279. [PMID: 31863354 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02249-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is a gap in knowledge regarding the impact of micrometastases (MIC) and isolated tumor cells (ITCs) found in the sentinel lymph nodes of patients with endometrial cancer. Here, we present a meta-analysis of the published literature on the rate of MIC and ITCs after lymphatic mapping and determine trends in postoperative management. METHODS Literature search of Medline and PubMed was done using the terms: micrometastases, isolated tumor cells, endometrial cancer, and sentinel lymph node. Inclusion criteria were: English-language manuscripts, retrospectives, or prospective studies published between January 1999 and June 2019. We removed manuscripts on sentinel node mapping that did not specify information on micrometastases or isolated tumor cells, non-English-language articles, no data about oncologic outcomes, and articles limited to ten cases or less. RESULTS A total of 45 manuscripts were reviewed, and 8 studies met inclusion criteria. We found that the total number of patients with MIC/ITCs was 286 (187 and 99, respectively). The 72% of patients detected with MIC/ITCs in sentinel nodes received adjuvant therapies. The MIC/ITCs group has a higher relative risk of recurrence of 1.34 (1.07, 1.67) than the negative group, even if the adjuvant therapy was given. CONCLUSION We noted that there is an increased relative risk of recurrence in patients with low-volume metastases, even after receiving adjuvant therapy. Whether adjuvant therapy is indicated remains a topic of debate because there are other uterine factors implicated in the prognosis. Multi-institutional tumor registries may help shed light on this important question.
Collapse
|
12
|
Predictors of extensive lymphatic dissemination and recurrences in node-positive endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 154:480-486. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Revised: 07/01/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
13
|
Lymph node micrometastases and outcome of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 154:475-479. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
14
|
Bogani G, Murgia F, Ditto A, Raspagliesi F. Sentinel node mapping vs. lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:676-683. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2019] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
15
|
Bogani G, Mariani A, Paolini B, Ditto A, Raspagliesi F. Low-volume disease in endometrial cancer: The role of micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 153:670-675. [PMID: 30833134 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2019] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Nodal assessment represents an integral part of staging procedure for endometrial cancer. The widespread diffusion of sentinel node mapping determinates a phenomenon of migration from stage I to stage III disease, especially for low-risk endometrial cancer patients. The adoption of sentinel node mapping and pathological ultrastaging increase the detection of low volume disease (i.e., micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells), being low volume disease detected in >30% of patients with positive nodes. The prognostic role of low volume disease is discussed as well as the possible adjuvant strategies for patients diagnosed with micrometastasis and isolated tumor cells. The role of further prospective treatments in endometrial cancer, including molecular and genetic profiling, is critically reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy.
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Antonino Ditto
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rossi EC. Current state of sentinel lymph nodes for women with endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019; 29:613-621. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2018] [Revised: 11/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been investigated as an alternative to conventional pelvic and para-aorticlymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. Clinical trials have established the accuracy of sentinel nodes in the detecting metastatic disease. Novel advancements in tracers from the historically favored blue dyes and radio labeled colloids to near infrared imaging of fluorescent dyes has improved the ability to detect sentinel nodes and increased options for surgeons. The uterine cervix has been shown to be a feasible and accurate injection site for tracer, though the potential for under-evaluation of the para-aortic nodes remains a controversy, particularly for high-risk cancers. Additionally, sentinel node evaluation provides qualitatively different information than traditional staging techniques by identifying lymph nodes outside of traditional sampling locations and through the identification of very low volume meta static disease implants, such as isolated tumor cells. It is unclear how this altered staging information should be interpreted, guide the prescription of adjuvant therapy and its impact on long term clinical outcomes such as recurrence and survival. In this review we will discuss the evidence that has supported the use of the SLN technique in the staging of endometrial cancer, the options for surgical technique and the implications of managing the results of staging pathology.
Collapse
|
17
|
Crivellaro C, Baratto L, Dolci C, De Ponti E, Magni S, Elisei F, Papadia A, Buda A. Sentinel node biopsy in endometrial cancer: an update. Clin Transl Imaging 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-018-0268-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|