Safety of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Premenopausal Women With Sex Cord-Stromal Tumors Confined to the Ovary

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrence in Adult Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors

PURPOSE

Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary are rare but clinically significant malignancies. Despite advances in treatment, recurrence has remained a substantial challenge. This study aimed to identify clinical outcomes and potential prognostic risk factors for recurrence in patients diagnosed with GCTs.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, the ovarian cancer database of the gynecological tertiary referral cancer center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, was searched from August 2012 to August 2023 to find GCT cases. Demographic, clinical, pathological, intervention-related factors, follow-up, and survival findings were meticulously collected. Data were analyzed using SPSS v 23.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients with GCTs, including 86 AGCT and 6 JGCT subjects, were identified. Based on further analysis of AGCT patients, most patients were ages under 50 (58.1%), clinically presented pain (32.6%), and abnormal uterine bleeding (27.9%) as the most frequent symptoms. Stages IA (64.0%) and IC (20.9%) were common. Five-year overall and progression-free survival were 98.2% and 90.8%, respectively. With a median follow-up time of 72 (0.0-180) months, disease recurrence was observed in 19 patients (23.9%), and five patients (5.4%) died of the disease. Stage IV was a hazard factor of recurrence (HR = 7.62, 95%CI (1.89-30.63); p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides valuable insights into the outcomes and potential risk factors for recurrence in ovarian AGCTs. It duplicates the importance of stage in the prognosis of AGCT patients and highlights the safety of fertility-sparing surgery in stage I and the lack of need to administer chemotherapy in stage IC.

Effects of different surgical extents on prognosis of patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study

Malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors are rare neoplasms that account for approximately 5-7% of all ovarian malignancies, and they are primarily treated with surgery. The prognosis of patients with different surgical extents remains controversial. Therefore, the effects of different surgical extents on the prognosis of patients were explored in this retrospective cohort study. Patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors who underwent surgical treatment from January 2000 to December 2019 were selected. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Prognosis factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. A total of 278 patients with an average age at onset of 42 (8-78) years old were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 73 months. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival and overall survival rates between patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who underwent Non-fertility-sparing surgery, and between patients underwent staging surgery and those underwent Non-staging surgery. Age < 40 years (P = 0.024), stage II-III (P = 0.038), a high CA125 level (P = 0.035) and WT-1 (+) (P = 0.016) were independent risk factors for recurrence. In conclusion, different surgical extents have no significant influence on recurrence and survival status of patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors.

Current limits of conservative treatment in ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fertility-sparing surgery in ovarian cancer is an increasing need in gynecology-oncology clinical practice because of the frequent childbearing delay in developed countries. As the evidence in literature is based on observational studies, this review focuses on summarizing the most recent and relevant evidence for the conservative management of young patients with ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Staging surgery is mandatory in epithelial ovarian tumors. In sex cord-stromal tumors, fertility-sparing surgery is only recommended in FIGO stage IA. Due to its good prognosis, conservative treatment is possible in some cases of advanced disease of germ cell tumors and borderline tumors. Cystectomy is a reasonable option in serous borderline tumors but is not recommended in other tumor subtypes. Successful conception rates after fertility-sparing surgery ranges from 30 to 60%.

SUMMARY

Fertility-sparing surgery is a well tolerated option in young women with early-stage ovarian cancer with acceptable reproductive outcomes.

Analysis of the Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes of Fertility-sparing Surgery in Ovarian Malignant Sex Cord-stromal Tumours: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

AIMS

To assess the difference in survival between fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) and radical surgery and explore pregnancy outcomes after FSS in stage I malignant sex cord-stromal tumours (MSCSTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a multicentre retrospective cohort study on patients who were diagnosed with MSCSTs and the tumour was confined to one ovary. The patients were divided into FSS and radical surgery groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance variables between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the difference in disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to find risk factors of DFS. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors of pregnancy.

RESULTS

In total, 107 patients were included, of whom 54 (50.5%) women underwent FSS and 53 (49.5%) received radical surgery. After IPTW, a pseudo-population of 208 was determined and all of the covariates were well balanced. After a median follow-up time of 50 months (range 7-156 months), 10 patients experienced recurrence and two died. There was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups, both in unweighted (P = 0.969) or weighted cohorts (P = 0.792). In the weighted cohort, stage IC (P = 0.014), tumour diameter >8 cm (P = 0.003), incomplete staging surgery (P = 0.003) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were the four high-risk factors associated with a shorter DFS. Among 14 patients who had pregnancy desire, 11 (78.6%) women conceived successfully; the live birth rate was 76.9%. In univariate analysis, only adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.009) was associated with infertility.

CONCLUSIONS

On the premise of complete staging surgery, FSS is safe and feasible in early stage MSCSTs with satisfactory reproductive outcomes.

Could fertility-sparing surgery be considered for stage I ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors? A comparison of the Fine-Gray model with Cox model

Objective

To evaluate the oncologic outcomes in patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) and the independent risk factors affecting overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Methods

Data were acquired from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1973 and 2018. A total of 240 patients diagnosed with stage I ovarian SCSTs were divided into the definitive surgery group (N=116) and FSS group (N=124). The Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox model were used to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of the two groups and assess the independent risk factors respectively. The Fine-Gray model evaluated cancer-specific mortality (CSM) and the independent risk factors that affected CSM.

Results

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no statistically significant differences in OS and CSS between the two groups (P>0.05). Univariate analysis of the Fine-Gray model also showed that there was no difference in the CSS between the two groups (P>0.05). However, from the 15th year postoperatively, the CSS of the FSS group decreased by 13.21% compared with that of the control group and by 17.49% in the 20th and 25th years postoperatively. The Cox proportional hazards model found that surgical methods (“defined surgery” vs “FSS”; HR=0.03259, P=0.0196) and FIGO stage (“stage IA” vs “stage IC”; HR=0.03073, P=0.0300) were independent risk factors for OS. The multivariate analysis of Fine-Gray model showed that the cancer-specific mortality of patients receiving definitive surgery was 40.1% lower than that of patients receiving FSS (“definitive surgery” vs “FSS”; HR=0.599, P=0.005), indicating that FSS might lead to higher tumor-specific mortality and lower CSS. However, age, race, laterality, history, FIGO stage, and tumor size had no significant influence on the tumor-specific mortality (P>0.05).

Conclusions

FSS is considered for patients with stage I SCSTs with reproductive needs, but the follow-up period should not be less than 15 years. For patients with stage IC disease, FSS should be selected carefully, and close follow-up is necessary. Perhaps, definitive surgery after birth is a means to improve long-term survival rates.

Use of staging for sex cord stromal tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sex cord-stromal tumours (SCSTs) are rare ovarian cancers. As in the literature, only small case series or case reports are published, gathering solid evidence about their management is challenging. Surgery plays a pivotal role, and accurate staging is one of the most important prognostic factors. This review focuses on the current evidence for surgical staging in the management of SCSTs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Staging procedures have been inferred by epithelial ovarian cancers; however, they are often only partially performed, and most SCSTs therefore end up incompletely staged, raising the issue of the need for restaging or further treatments. In addition, some parts of the staging procedure have been questioned over the years, and lymphadenectomy is now considered unnecessary for SCSTs.The generally favourable prognosis of SCSTs, the introduction of minimally invasive surgery and fertility-sparing approaches is empowering the question of which staging procedures are beneficial for these patients. We reviewed the role of each staging procedure proposed by the guidelines in light of new scientific updates.

SUMMARY

Surgical staging should always be performed. It includes peritoneal samplings (peritoneal washing, multiple peritoneal biopsies, omental biopsy and biopsy of any suspicious area), whereas lymphadenectomy could be omitted. Laparoscopy may be considered a feasible approach.

Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes

The incidence of cancer in reproductive-aged women is 7%, but, despite the increased number of cancer cases, advances in early diagnosis and treatment have raised the survival rate. Furthermore, in the last four decades, there has been a rising trend of delaying childbearing. There has been an increasing number of couples referred to Reproductive Medicine Centers for infertility problems after one partner has been treated for cancer. In these cases, the main cause of reduced fertility derives from treatments. In this review, we describe the effects and the risks of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in women with cancer, and we will focus on available fertility preservation techniques and their efficacy in terms of success in pregnancy and live birth rates.

Fertility sparing surgery in sex-cord stromal tumors: oncological and reproductive outcomes

Sex cord stromal tumors are rare neoplasms, frequently diagnosed in young women often as early-stage disease. In patients who desire to preserve fertility, when possible, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with peritoneal surgical staging is a safe alternative to radical treatment. In this review, we analyze the available literature on the obstetrical outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in a total of 255 patients with sex cord stromal tumors. We found that the spontaneous conception rate in granulosa cells tumor is encouraging (88.5%). In particular, juvenile granulosa cell tumors are associated with a more successful pregnancy rate than adult granulosa cells tumors (11/26 (42.3%) in juvenile granulosa cells tumors compared with 28.5% in adult granulosa cell tumors, respectively.) On the other hand, the results of obstetrical outcomes in Sertoli-Leydig cells tumors are less promising (7/36 (19.4%)). Unfortunately, no evidence on this topic is available for sex cord tumor with annular tubules due to the low incidence. Regarding the oncological outcomes of 900 cases of sex cord stromal tumors treated conservatively, data are reassuring with comparable outcomes between patients treated with conservative and radical surgery. Given the limited available data on this rare tumor, further studies are needed to evaluate the safety of conservative approaches and to define the obstetrical outcomes in this patient population.

Oncological Prognosis and Fertility Outcomes of Different Surgical Extents for Malignant Ovarian Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors: A Narrative Review

Background

Malignant ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors (MOSCSTs) are rare neoplasms that account for approximately 5–7% of all ovarian malignancies. The majority (70%) of patients had an early stage; thus, surgery is the predominant treatment. Patients were relatively young at the onset of the tumor. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with this tumor is better than that of malignant epithelial ovarian tumors and tends to recur late with an indolent clinical course. Thus, patients may be more inclined to conservative surgical procedures. There is, however, no objective criterion for selecting a suitable surgical procedure. Clinically, surgical extent depended on the preoperative evaluations, age, and willingness of patients, and gynecologists were relatively subjective when choosing surgery. The prognosis of patients with different surgical extents is still controversial. The review aimed to summarize the impacts of different surgical extents on oncological prognosis and fertility outcomes.

Methods

The literature search was performed in PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), and publications between January 2011 and December 2021 in English including clinical cohort studies and case reports were eligible for inclusion.

Results

We finally identified 12 large-sample retrospective studies and 18 cases of MOSCSTs. The primary surgical procedures include fertility-spring surgery (FSS), total hysterectomy with unilateral or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-USO/BSO), FSS with complete staging procedure, complete staging surgery (CSS), and debulking surgery. FSS includes cystectomy (CYS), unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) with uterine preservation that allows for potential future assisted reproductive approaches. Complete staging procedure includes peritoneal cytologic examinations, inspections of peritoneal surfaces, random peritoneal biopsies and omentectomy. FSS with complete staging procedure means surgical procedure with uterine preservation and complete staging procedure. And, generally, CSS means TAH-BSO with complete staging procedure.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that USO can be done in young, fertility-desired patients with tumors confined to the ovary but avoid CYS. FSS with complete staging procedure is feasible among stage IC-III patients who have fertility desire. Patients can choose to have a complete surgery once their family is complete or without fertility requirements. CSS is recommended for patients with risk factors such as high stage, poor differentiation, and large tumor size and without fertility desire. A close follow-up is essential.

Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer

Although the incidence of the various gynecological cancers has been increasing in recent years, long-term survival is now possible for many patients thanks to advances in multimodality treatment. When treating gynecological cancer in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who desire future pregnancy, it is necessary to preserve the reproductive organs and their function to prevent loss of fertility. However, because treatment targets these organs, in the large majority of cases, patients must have these organs removed. In the subfield of oncofertility, treatment of the underlying disease takes priority, and the main principle is preventing delay in treatment. Close cooperation between obstetricians and gynecologists involved in reproductive medicine and oncologists involved in cancer treatment is necessary. In addition, it is important that clinicians work closely not only with other specialists but also with such medical professionals as nurses and counselors so that cancer patients of the AYA generation can be provided the support they need to fight their cancer with hope. Herein, we describe the current status of fertility-sparing therapy for AYA patients with gynecological cancer (cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian cancer). In addition, we explain points to keep in mind during a patient's pregnancy after fertility preservation, the latest findings on assisted reproductive technology, and the challenges and prospects of fertility preservation therapy for patients with gynecologic cancer.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of ovarian granulosa cell tumors: A JSGO-JSOG joint study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinicopathological features of ovarian granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) and to identify the prognostic factors.

METHODS

The Japanese Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) conducted an observational retrospective cohort study of women with GCTs enrolled in the Gynecological Tumor Registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) between 2002 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, including lymph node metastasis, were evaluated. In addition, we performed a prognostic analysis of patients between 2002 and 2011 for whom survival data were available. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 1426 patients with GCTs. Of the 222 patients who underwent lymph node dissection, 10 (4.5%) had lymph node metastasis. The incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with pT1, pT2, and pT3 was 2.1%, 13.3%, and 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Prognostic analysis was performed on 674 patients. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, residual disease after initial surgery (hazard ratio (HR) = 10.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.15-34.29) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 5.58, 95% CI = 1.62-19.19) were independent risk factors for cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial surgery for GCTs, lymph node dissection can be omitted if the operative finding is pT1. In cases of pT2 or higher, lymph node dissection should be considered. Debulking is critical for achieving no gross residual tumor at the end of the surgery.

Progress in the management of ovarian granulosa cell tumor: A review

Ovarian granulosa cell tumor (GCT) is a rare, low-grade malignant tumor that accounts for 70% of the sex cord-stromal tumors. It has two histopathologic types with different clinical and biologic features: adult GCT and juvenile GCT. Most women diagnosed with the adult GCT have a favorable prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 97%-98%, but adult GCT has a feature of late relapse; the recurrence time could be more than 20 years after diagnosis. Juvenile GCT has a survival rate of 97% in stage I and a 5-year survival rate of 0%-22% in advanced stage with earlier recurrence than adult GCT. Consequently, the scenario emphasizes the need for early diagnosis, standardized treatment protocols, and long-term follow up. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding accurate diagnosis of GCT and adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, GCT tends to occur in young women, which emphasizes the viability of fertility-sparing surgery. The current review performed a systematic literature review of 60 articles to summarize the latest advances in GCT, with an emphasis on the molecular pathogenesis and survival after fertility-sparing surgery. We found that young women with fertility-sparing surgery had a desirable reproductive and survival outcome compared with those undergoing radical surgery.

Anaesthetic considerations for fertility-sparing surgery and uterine transplantation

A number of benign and malignant gynaecological conditions can cause infertility. Advancements in assisted reproductive technologies have facilitated the rapidly evolving subspecialty of fertility preservation. Regardless of clinical indication, women now have the reproductive autonomy to make fully informed decisions regarding their future fertility. In particular, there has been an increasing interest and demand among patients and healthcare professionals for fertility-sparing surgery. Gynaecologists find themselves continually adapting surgical techniques and introducing novel procedures to facilitate this rapidly emerging field and anaesthetists need to manage the consequent physiological demands intra-operatively. Not only is it important to understand the surgical procedures now undertaken, but also the intra-operative management in an ever evolving field. This article reviews the methods of fertility-sparing surgery and also describes important anaesthetic challenges including peri-operative care for women undergoing complex fertility-sparing surgeries such as uterus transplantation.

Outcomes after Fertility-sparing Surgery for Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To compare reproductive and oncologic outcomes of patients diagnosed with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma, borderline ovarian tumors, or nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma according to receipt of fertility-sparing surgery or conventional surgery.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched from January 1, 1995, to May 29, 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they (1) enrolled women of childbearing age diagnosed with ovarian cancer between the ages of 18 years and 50 years, (2) reported on oncologic and/or reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer, and (3) included at least 20 patients.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The initial search identified 995 studies. After duplicates were removed, we abstracted 980 unique citations. Of those screened, 167 publications were identified as potentially relevant, and evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The final review included 44 studies in epithelial ovarian cancer, 42 in borderline ovarian tumors, and 31 in nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma. The narrative synthesis demonstrated that overall survival does not seem to be compromised in patients undergoing fertility-sparing surgery compared with those undergoing conventional surgery, although long-term data are limited. Areas of controversy include safety of fertility-sparing surgery in the setting of high-risk factors (stage IC, grade 3, and clear cell histology), as well as type of surgery (salpingo-oophorectomy vs cystectomy). It seems that although there may be some fertility compromise after surgery, pregnancy and live-birth rates are encouraging.

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing surgery is safe and feasible in women with early-stage low-risk ovarian cancer. Pregnancy outcomes for these patients also seem to be similar to those of the general population.

Does uterine preservation affect survival outcomes of patients with stage I ovarian sex cord-stromal cell tumours? A multi-institutional study

OBJECTIVE

Sex cord-stromal tumours of the ovary are relatively uncommon neoplasms that account for 3 % of all ovarian cancers. Uterine preservation with careful staging is achievable; however, conservative surgery remains controversial. This study examined the prognostic effects of uterine preservation in patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was undertaken between January 1986 and February 2019, and the clinicopathological data of 4897 women with malignant ovarian tumours were collected. Seventy-seven patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours were eligible for inclusion. The characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients were examined. To investigate the prognostic effects of uterine-preserving surgery, baseline imbalances between patients with and without uterine-preserving surgery were adjusted using an inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores composed of independent clinical variables.

RESULTS

The mean ages of patients in the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups were 39.8 and 57.8 years, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustments, no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.205) or recurrence-free survival (p=0.071) were observed between the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups. Estimated 10-year overall survival rates were 98.7 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 95.9 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group, and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 87.2 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 78.2 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group. Uterine-preserving surgery did not significantly affect the site of tumour recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Uterine-preserving surgery may be a feasible surgical option for patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours. Further research is needed to guarantee prognostic accuracy and develop effective therapeutic approaches for sex cord-stromal tumours.

Fertility sparing surgery for ovarian sex cord stromal tumors: a nine case series

Ovarian Sex Cord Stromal Tumors (SCST) are a rare disease carrying a good prognosis. They generally affect young women; therefore fertility preservation is a critical issue. Fertility Sparing Surgery (FSS) showed promising results in both oncologic safety and fertility preservation. A retrospective case series involving 9 patients diagnosed with SCST and treated with fertility sparing surgery at our institution was conducted between January 2000 and May 2015. The median age was 24 years old (10 to 39). The main clinical manifestation was pelvic pain seen in seven patients. Five patients complained about menstrual cycle disorders. The nine patients went through fertility sparing surgery; seven had conservative staging and the other two had a unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Three patients out of nine had a pelvic unilateral lymphadenectomy. Two patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Only two patients presented locoregional recurrence that occurred respectively after 7 and 192 months. The treatment combined chemotherapy and surgery based on mass resection. One patient achieved a natural pregnancy after the treatment. FSS seems to be a suitable approach for SCST. However, more case series and meta-analysis should be conducted.