Management of the Elderly Patient With Gynecologic Cancer: Report of the 2011 Workshop in Geriatric Gynecologic Oncology

Advantages of laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery in elderly patients

OBJECTIVE

Geriatric patients requiring gynecological surgery is increasing worldwide. However, older patients are at higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality, particularly cardiopulmonary complications. Laparoscopic surgery is widely used as a minimally invasive method for reducing postoperative morbidities. We compared the outcomes of open and laparoscopic gynecologic surgeries in patients older than 55 years.

METHODS

We included patients aged >55 years who underwent gynecological surgery at a single tertiary center between 2010 and 2020, excluding vaginal or ovarian cancer surgeries were excluded. Surgical outcomes were compared between the open surgery and laparoscopic groups, with age cutoff was set at 65 years for optimal discriminative power. We performed linear or logistic regression analyses to compare the surgical outcomes according to age and operation type.

RESULTS

Among 2,983 patients, 28.6% underwent open surgery and 71.4% underwent laparoscopic surgery. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic surgery were better than those of open surgery in all groups. In both the open and laparoscopic surgery groups, the older patients showed worse overall surgical outcomes. However, age-related differences in perioperative outcomes were less severe in the laparoscopic group. In the linear regression analysis, the differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion, and hospital stay between the age groups were smaller in the laparoscopy group. Similar restuls were observed in cancer-only and benign-only cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Although the surgical outcomes were worse in the older patients, the difference between age groups was smaller for laparoscopic surgery. Laparoscopic surgery offers more advantages and safety in patients aged >65 years.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment is correlated to overall survival among gynaecologic oncology patients

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation of comprehensive geriatric assessment to overall survival among older gynaecologic oncology patients.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2017, patients >70 years had geriatric assessment before treatment. Geriatric assessment included the following tests: Old American resource and services, instrumental activities of daily living, modified Barthels index, mini-mental state examination, geriatric depression scale, mini-nutritional assessment, risk of falling and medication use. Overall survival was calculated for patients' groups below and above median tests scores. Univariate as well as multivariate analysis was done to evaluate the association between each variable and survival.

RESULTS

About 120 patients had geriatric assessment. Mean patients' age was 76.4 ± 5. A total of 78 Patients had ovarian cancer, 16 uterine cancer, 17 cervical cancer and 9 had other gynaecologic malignancies. No correlation was found between age, BMI (body mass index) and cancer type to overall survival. Patients with scores below cut-off values of modified Barthels index, instrumental activities of daily living, mini-nutritional assessment and mini-nutritional assessment had significantly shorter overall survival (P = 0.004, 0.031, 0.046 and 0.004, respectively). This remained significant in both univariate and multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Gynaecologic oncology patients with lower geriatric assessment scores have significantly lower overall survival, irrespective of cancer type. Geriatric assessment tests allow objective assessment of older patients with worst prognosis before treatment planning.

Gynecologic cancer outcomes in the elderly poor: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Adults aged ≥65 years who are dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid are an at-risk group in health care. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the outcomes of women with gynecologic cancers in this population are unknown.

METHODS

The current study was a population-based cohort study of North Carolina state cancer registry cases of uterine, ovarian, cervical, and vulvar/vaginal cancers (2003-2009), with linked enrollment in Medicare and state Medicaid. Outcomes of all-cause mortality and stage of disease at the time of diagnosis were analyzed as a function of enrollment status using multivariate analysis and survival curves.

RESULTS

Of 4522 women aged ≥65 years (3702 of whom were enrolled in Medicare [82%] and 820 of whom were dually enrolled [18%]), there were 2286 cases of uterine (51%), 1587 cases of ovarian (35%), 302 cases of cervical (7%), and 347 cases of vulvar/vaginal (8%) cancers. Dual enrollees had increased all-cause mortality overall (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.19-1.49), and within each cancer site (uterine: aHR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02-1.47]; ovarian: aHR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.05-1.49]; cervical: aHR, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.96-1.87]; and vulvar/vaginal: aHR, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.36-2.72]). Increased odds of advanced-stage disease at the time of diagnosis among dual enrollees was only present in patients with uterine cancer (adjusted odds ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.79). Stratified survival curves demonstrated the strongest disparities among women with early-stage uterine and early-stage vulvar/vaginal cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Women aged ≥65 years who were dually enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid were found to have an overall 34% increase in all-cause mortality after diagnosis with a gynecologic cancer compared with the non-dually enrolled Medicare population. Women with early-stage uterine and vulvar/vaginal cancers appeared to have the most disparate outcomes. Because these malignancies are generally curable, they have the most potential for benefit from targeted interventions.

Epidemiology in ovarian carcinoma: Lessons from autopsy

OBJECTIVE

We challenge epidemiologic knowledge regarding ovarian carcinoma (OC) by bridging the gap between clinical and autopsy data.

METHODS

Autopsy reports, histological slides and clinical files from 660 patients in whom OC was diagnosed from 1975-2005 were studied (autopsy cohort, n=233; Clinical Cancer Registry from the local gyneco-oncologic center, n=427).

RESULTS

Out of the autopsy cohort, we identified four distinct subgroups of patients: 1) OC was diagnosed before autopsy, n=156 (67.0%). 2) OC was an incidental finding, n=16 (6.8%). 3) The ovarian tumors were not primary OC but rather metastases from other primary tumors; this revised diagnosis was first made by using current histopathological knowledge/techniques, n=24 (10.3%). 4) Death was directly due to OC in its final stage and OC was first diagnosed by autopsy, n=37 (15.9%); when these cases were added to the Clinical Cancer Registry to an adjusted OC incidence model, the autopsy cases comprised 8.8% of the adjusted cohort and almost doubled the percentage of oldest patients (≥80 years at diagnosis) from 4.9% to 9.3% (p=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Epidemiological data from the 1970s-1990s may overestimate true incidence because up to 10% of carcinomas in the ovary were not properly classified. Patients who were first diagnosed with OC by autopsy comprise a distinct subgroup. These are patients who have not been seen by specialized oncologists and thus play no role in their perception of the disease. Nevertheless, these cases have impact on prevalence and incidence data of OC and in an era of reduced autopsy rates will probably be overlooked.

Feasibility study of pelvic helical IMRT for elderly patients with endometrial cancer

Purpose

Standard treatment for early-stage endometrial cancer involves surgery (when possible) followed by brachytherapy or external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for high-risk tumors. EBRT is not without toxicity, meaning that it could be difficult to complete for elderly patients, who typically have decreased reserve and resistance to stressors.

Patients and methods

Patients aged 70 and over treated between April 2009 and May 2013 for endometrial cancer and received IMRT (Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy) were included in this observational study. IMRT could be performed as adjuvant treatment or as an exclusive treatment for patients not amenable to surgery. The primary endpoints of this study were to assess the feasibility and toxicity of pelvic IMRT in this population. Secondary endpoints were to assess disease-specific survival, overall survival, and local control. Predictors of toxicity were also explored.

Results

Forty seven consecutive patients were included in the analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 75 years (range, 70–89 years). Eleven patients were aged 80 years and older. Toxicities were found in thirty four patients (72%) during treatment. Among these, toxicity did not exceed grade 2 for 32 patients (68%). Two patients had a grade 3 toxicity (4%). Overall survival rates were 87% and 83% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Six patients (12.8%) had a local relapse and nine others (19.1%) had distant relapse.

Conclusions

Pelvic helical IMRT for patients aged 70 and older is feasible with full standard radiation doses, showing that age greater than 70 should not be considered as a reason not to perform optimal treatment.

Pre- and intra-operative variables associated with surgical complications in elderly patients with gynecologic cancer: the clinical value of comprehensive geriatric assessment

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the associations of pre- and intra-operative variables including comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) with surgical complications in elderly patients who underwent primary surgery for gynecologic cancer.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients ≥70years of age who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery for the treatment of gynecologic cancer were preoperatively assessed by CGA. Every category of CGA, performance status (PS), and brief fatigue inventory (BFI) as well as surgical complexity were evaluated for 30-day surgical complications.

RESULTS

The overall postoperative complication rate was 30.0% (18/60) including 9 (15.0%) major and 8 (13.3%) multiple complications. Univariate analysis revealed that dependent instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) was associated with any (p=0.023) and multiple complications (p=0.019). Poor PS was associated with major (p=0.021) and multiple complications (p=0.014). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that high surgical complexity was the most independent predictor of any, major, and multiple complications, whereas poor PS was the independent predictor only for multiple complications (odds ratio 10.7, 95% confidence interval 1.7 to 90.2, p=0.043). There was no CGA component which could independently predict postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Surgical complexity can predict any, major, and multiple postoperative complications, while PS seems to be useful in predicting multiple complications in elderly patients with gynecologic cancer. In this small study, a CGA was not useful in predicting postoperative complications.

Research priorities in geriatric palliative care: nonpain symptoms

Research addressing the burden, assessment, and management of nonpain symptoms associated with advanced illness in older adults is limited. While nonpain symptoms such as fatigue, sleep, dyspnea, anxiety, depression, cognitive impairment, nausea, and anorexia-cachexia are commonly noted by patients and clinicians, research quantifying their effects on quality of life, function, and other outcomes are lacking and there is scant evidence regarding management. Most available studies have focused on relatively narrow conditions (e.g., chemotherapy-induced nausea) and there are almost no data relevant to patients with multiple morbidities or multiple concurrent symptoms. Assessment and treatment of nonpain symptoms in older adults with serious illness and multiple comorbidities is compromised by the lack of data relevant to their care. Recommended research priorities address the documented high prevalence of distressing symptoms in older adults with serious illness, the unique needs of this population due to coexistence of multiple chronic conditions along with physiologic changes related to aging, the lack of evidence for effective pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions, and the need for validated measures that are relevant across multiple care settings.

The impact of old age on surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Old age is regarded as the risk factor of major abdominal surgery due to the lack of functional reserve and the increased presence of comorbidities. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of old age on the surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

This study enrolled 389 gastric cancer patients who underwent totally laparoscopic gastrectomy at Hanyang University Guri Hospital and ASAN Medical Center. The patients were classified into two groups according to age as those older than 70 years and those younger than 70 years. Early surgical outcomes such as operation time, postoperative complications, time to first flatus, days until soft diet began, and hospital stay were evaluated.

RESULTS

No patient was converted to open surgery. The two groups differed significantly in terms of overall postoperative complication rate, time to first flatus, days until soft diet began, and hospital stay. The patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy differed in incidence of postoperative ileus but not in severe postoperative complication rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study demonstrated that old age can have an effect on the surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy. This study especially showed that elderly patients are affected by the return of bowel movement after totally laparoscopic gastrectomy. On the other hand, however, it is presumed that old age has not had a serious impact on surgical outcomes in totally laparoscopic gastrectomy because no difference in the severe postoperative complication rate was observed.

Laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy for elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare surgical and survival outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) vs open radical hysterectomy (ORH) in elderly patients with early-stage cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis was performed on elderly patients (≥65 years) who underwent either LRH (n = 99) or ORH (n = 159) due to stage IA2-IIA2 cervical cancer.

RESULTS

One patient (1%) in LRH group required conversion to laparotomy. Operating time (P = .035), estimated blood loss (P = .002), recovery of bowel movement (P < .001), and postoperative hospital stay (P < .001) were significantly shorter or lower in LRH group. Postoperative complications were significantly less frequent in LRH group (P = .026). After the median follow-up time of 45 months, the 5-year disease-free survival (95% vs 93%, P = .350) and overall survival (96% vs 95%, P = .361) did not differ between LRH and ORH groups.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients tolerated well both LRH and ORH. LRH was associated with better surgical outcomes compared to ORH without increasing intraoperative complications or decreasing survival.