Orbital Tumors and Inflammatory Disorders: Diagnosis and Management

A retrospective analysis of the management and surgical treatment of orbital lesions: Outcomes and rationale

The orbital cavity is a subject of interest for various specialists, and achieving optimal outcomes requires comprehensive, multidisciplinary management. This study aims to report 10 years of experience in the preoperative, surgical, and postoperative care of patients with orbital lesions, examining their clinical, radiological, and anatomopathological features and outcomes. A retrospective review of 125 patients who underwent surgical treatment for intraorbital masses between January 2012 and December 2021 was performed. Outcome measures included postoperative diplopia, exophthalmos, decimal visual acuity, eyeball position, ocular motility, operative time, complications, and aesthetic results. A total of 107 patients were included. All cases were discussed with a neuroradiologist to determine the best therapeutic approach based on preoperative imaging. Preoperative diplopia was linked to extraconal (p = 0.03) and anterior (p = 0.001) lesions, and exophthalmos and visual acuity deterioration were associated with intraconal (p = 0.02; p = 0.03) and retrobulbar (p = 0.001; p = 0.02) lesions. Complications (11.2%) included diplopia, worsened visual acuity, postoperative blepharoptosis, and postoperative ectropion. Of the patients, 80.4% reported an "excellent" aesthetic outcome. This study underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach based on a thorough analysis of preoperative imaging. Periorbital approaches tailored to the lesion's three-dimensional location enables safe access to most intraorbital lesions, resulting in minimal complications and good aesthetic results.

An Evidence-Based Approach to Diagnosing Patients Presenting With Orbital Inflammatory Syndromes (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis)

PURPOSE

The initial management of patients presenting with orbital inflammatory syndromes varies-with some pursuing a diagnostic workup while others treat without any testing. The evidence behind this rationale is limited. A review of patients with orbital inflammation is performed with an analysis of diagnostic testing to develop a workflow for such patients.

DESIGN

A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute orbital inflammation at a single institution from 2011 to 2020 was conducted.

METHODS

Orbital imaging was required for inclusion. Patients with high suspicion of neoplasm, bacterial infection, vascular malformation, or thyroid eye disease were excluded. A review of presenting clinical findings, laboratory workup, orbital imaging, and biopsy were performed. Statistical analysis was performed identifying statistically significant diagnostic and treatment maneuvers.

RESULTS

In total, 172 patients met inclusion criteria (66% female, mean age 46 years). The primary clinical presentation was myositis, dacryoadenitis, and infiltrative in 67, 73, and 32 patients (39.0%, 43.0%, 18.6%, respectively). Laboratory studies were conducted in 145 (84%) while biopsy was performed in 55 (32%). Specific orbital inflammation (SOI) was diagnosed in 29 (16.9%) with the most frequent diagnoses being sarcoidosis, IgG4-related disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and systemic lupus erythematosus. The majority (147, 85.5%) was initially treated with steroids, but steroid-sparing agent use was statistically higher in patients with SOI.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients presenting with orbital inflammatory syndromes, distinguishing myositis, dacryoadenitis, and infiltrative disease has workup and differential diagnosis impacts. Because SOI is relatively common, sequelae of SOI, and potential steroid-sparing therapy needs, diagnosis via an evidence-based systemic approach is critical. NOTE: Publication of this article is sponsored by the American Ophthalmological Society.

Can 18F-FDG PET/CT findings be used to predict orbital tumor histology?

PURPOSE

To investigate whether 18F-FDG PET/CT might be useful to predict the histology of various orbital tumors based on the maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and the OMSUV (orbital max SUV)/MLSUV (mean liver SUV) ratio.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was conducted between May 2019 and December 2020. Patients with an orbital mass who underwent preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT followed by an orbital biopsy were included. Tumor histology was classified as follows: orbital inflammation, solid tumor, low-grade lymphoid tumor, and high-grade lymphoid tumor. Orbital tumors were also classified as indolent or aggressive. Data recorded included the orbital SUVmax, OMSUV/MLSUV ratio and additional extra-orbital SUV sites.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients (24 men) were included. There were 15 (33.3%), 14 (31.1%), 9 (20%), and 7 (15.5%) cases of orbital inflammation, solid tumor, low-grade lymphoid tumor, and high-grade lymphoid tumor, respectively. No correlation was found between the OMSUV/MLSUV ratio and orbital SUVmax and tumor histology (Z = -0.77, Z = -0.6, Z = -1.6, and Z = 0.94, all P > 0.05, respectively). No correlation was found between the OMSUV/MLSUV ratio (Z = -1.42, P > 0.05) and orbital SUVmax (Z = -0.82, P > 0.05) and tumor aggressiveness (indolent versus aggressive). Subgroup analyses showed that SUVmax was predictive of lymphoma aggressiveness (P = 0.05) and was able to distinguish orbital cancers (all lymphomas+solid tumors) from benign tumors (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET/CT could not be used to predict the underlying orbital tumor histology. However, more aggressive tumors, especially high-grade lymphomas and cancers, tended to have a higher orbital SUVmax compared to indolent lesions.

Orbital inflammatory pseudotumor: new advances in diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment

Orbital inflammatory pseudotumor (OIP) is a benign, non-specific inflammatory disorder that commonly occurs in middle-aged adults and is usually unilateral but can occur bilaterally. Its clinical manifestations have tremendous clinical heterogeneity and vary according to the site of infiltration and the degree of lesions, including orbital pain, swelling, diplopia, proptosis, restricted eye movement, and decreased visual acuity. Clinical features, Image characteristics and pathological examinations often need to be evaluated to confirm the diagnosis. Currently, there is no systematic research on the pathogenesis of OIP, which may be related to immunity or infection. The first-line treatment is glucocorticoids. Radiotherapy, immunosuppressants, and biologics can be considered for treatment-resistant, hormone-dependent, or intolerant patients. In this review, we aim to summarize and focus on new insights into OIP, including new diagnostic criteria, pathogenesis, and discoveries in new drugs and treatment strategies. In particular, we highlight the literature and find that T cell-mediated immune responses are closely related to the pathogenesis of OIP. Further exploration of the mechanism and signaling pathway of T cells in the immune process will help to identify their therapeutic targets and carry out targeted therapy to treat refractory OIP and reduce the side effects of traditional treatments.

Autoimmune disease of head and neck, imaging, and clinical review

Autoimmune disease of the head and neck (H&N) could be primary or secondary to systemic diseases, medications, or malignancies. Immune-mediated diseases of the H&N are not common in daily practice of radiologists; the diagnosis is frequently delayed because of the non-specific initial presentation and lack of familiarity with some of the specific imaging and clinical features. In this review, we aim to provide a practical diagnostic approach based on the specific radiological findings for each disease. We hope that our review will help radiologists expand their understanding of the spectrum of the discussed disease entities, help them narrow the differential diagnosis, and avoid unnecessary tissue biopsy when appropriate based on the specific clinical scenarios.

Management of Orbital Masses: Outcomes of Endoscopic and Combined Approaches With No Orbital Reconstruction

Introduction

The endoscopic endonasal approach to management of orbital pathology has expanded. Due to the rarity of these conditions, most reports in the literature consist of small case reports. We report a series from a single institution with a focus on outcomes.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was carried out between 2010 and 2018.

Results

Twenty-four patients were identified (average age 58 years, 15 males, 9 females). Average follow-up was 14.9 months. Most common etiologies included cavernous hemangioma (7), metastases (6), idiopathic orbital inflammatory syndrome (6), orbital hematoma/clot (2), and schwannoma (1). Most common presenting symptoms were decreased visual acuity (8), proptosis (8), diplopia (7), and incidental findings (2). All patients underwent endoscopic medial wall orbital decompressions. Sixteen involved a combined open approach by an ophthalmologist. Pathology was either biopsied (15), resected (6), or could not be identified (3). No intraoperative complications were noted. No patients underwent orbital reconstruction of the medial wall. Six patients developed postoperative sinusitis successfully managed with antibiotics. One patient developed epistaxis managed conservatively. In 5 patients, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 scores increased immediately postop and then decreased, whereas scores only decreased in 6 patients. Six patients noted reduced proptosis. There were no new cases of diplopia or worsening visual acuity.

Conclusions

A combined endoscopic endonasal and external approach can be useful for managing orbital lesions. Patients tolerated the procedure well with improvement in ocular symptoms and minimal sinonasal complications. Reconstruction of the medial wall may not be warranted to prevent postoperative diplopia.