Canadian ophthalmologists' opinions concerning complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use in glaucoma

Rehabilitative strategies after filtering procedure in glaucoma

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of non-reversible blindness worldwide, and almost 6 million people are estimated to be impaired visually in advanced stage of glaucoma. Recently, several studies on glaucoma has been focused towards new therapeutic approaches based on mechanisms independent from IOP control. Effects of new therapeutic agents, visual psychophysical training, or complementary medications targeting optic pathways today seem to be a relevant and effervescent field of research. The goal of the study is to evaluate in glaucoma patients if a rehabilitative strategy with a biofeedback training with microperimetry may be useful after surgery in recovery visual performance even when visual field defects are present in IOP is well controlled environment. Were enrolled 24 patients (28 eyes) with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) (mean 63 range: 49–75 years) from our Glaucoma Center after filtering surgery. All patients after one months from surgical intervention underwent to a complete ophthalmologic examination: IOP measurement, gonioscopy, visual field and SD-OCT at baseline of RNFL thickness. In some cases, were included in the study both eyes because in POAG frequently clinical conditions are different in each eye, and secondarily new fixation target retinal location (TRL) was chosen based on single eye retinal sensitivity. Best corrected visual acuity was significantly increased after the training from 0.61 to 0.479 (p = 0.00058) with no change in refractive error. After the biofeedback patients presented increased value in Mean retinal sensitivity from 14.91 to 15.96 (p = 0.0078).Fixation stabilitywas improved either according to Fuji classification (increased from 75.1 to 81.3% p = 0.0073) or BCEA value, reduced from 8.7 to 6.0 square degrees (p = 0.013) we noted a marked increase in this parameter with better performances and satisfaction by the patient. RFNL thickness: no change was noted (p = 0.505) in this value as an indicator of disease’s stability. Our data indicate that MP-3 Biofeedback may be a good strategy to reduce the impairment of the Glaucoma Patient.

Use of complementary and alternative therapies by patients with eye diseases: a hospital-based cross-sectional study from Palestine

BACKGROUND

Generally, complementary and alternative therapies (CAT) are accepted methods of treatment by patients with various types of conditions. Their use is becoming especially prevalent among patients with eye problems even in developed countries. Thus, we aimed to determine the pattern of use of CAT in this patient population, to identify the patient characteristics associated with the use of CAT, and to assess the types of CAT used.

METHODS

A descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted in Palestine at An-Najah National University Hospital between the time periods of October 2019 to May 2020, using questionnaire-based face to face interviews. Data were collected through convenience sampling. Patients responded to the questionnaire, which was focused on information adapted from previous research in this area, covering socio-demographic and clinical characteristics, types of CAT, source of information, and side effects on CAT use.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were interviewed for our study. Over two thirds, 67% reported using CAT for the specific purpose of improving their eye condition, and about one third (29.1%) received more than one therapy. The most common therapies reported were duea' (i.e. supplication) (47.1%) and herbal therapies (24.1%). It was shown that patients with bilateral involvement of their eyes were almost twice more likely to describe using CAT than patients with unilateral eye pathology (p = 0.006). Also, patients who underwent surgery as their route of treatment were significantly less likely to use CAT (p = 0.043). Most of our study participants mentioned a non-physician source as their source of information regarding CAT with family members being the most frequently mentioned (30.2%) followed by the internet (25.6%) and friends (19.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of CAT use among patients with eye disease is somewhat high in our study population. Because CAT may trigger adverse reactions, influence the progression of the disease, and interfere with conventional treatment, the ophthalmologist should frequently be asked patients with such diagnostics regarding the use of these therapies. Further work is required to analyze the mechanisms of action and to establish realistic guidelines for the use of these modalities.

The Role of Diet in Glaucoma: A Review of the Current Evidence

Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction by medications, laser, or surgery remains the mainstay of treatment in glaucoma. However, the role of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in glaucoma has received great interest from both patients and ophthalmologists. Previous evidence suggests that diet, a major domain of CAM, can influence an individual's IOP level. Furthermore, certain dietary components have been linked to the incidence and progression of glaucoma. In this review, we aim to provide a summary of the current evidence regarding the role of obesity, certain dietary components, and dietary supplements in glaucoma.

Cannabinoids for treatment of glaucoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the current status of cannabis in the treatment of glaucoma, including the greater availability of marijuana in the USA.

RECENT FINDINGS

The potency of marijuana, as measured by the concentration of Δ-tetrahydrocannabinol, has increased from ∼2 to 3% in the 1970s to ∼20% today. Many US states have passed laws allowing either medicinal or recreational use of marijuana.

SUMMARY

The pharmacology of marijuana and its effect on intraocular pressure has not changed since the research in the 1970s and 1980s. Marijuana is an effective ocular hypotensive agent. However, cardiovascular and neurological effects are observed at the same dose, and may theoretically reduce the beneficial effect of lowering intraocular pressure by reducing ocular blood flow. The clinician must be cognizant of this potential in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.