Liposome Bupivacaine for Postsurgical Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Robotically Assisted Cardiac Surgery

Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine Compared With Standard- of-Care Measures in Pediatric Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Effective postsurgical pain management is important for pediatric patients to improve outcomes while reducing resource use and waste. The authors examined opioid consumption and economic outcomes associated with liposomal bupivacaine (LB) or non-LB analgesia use in pediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

DESIGN

The authors retrospectively analyzed Premier Healthcare Database records.

SETTING

The data extracted from the database included patient records from hospitals across the United States in both rural and urban locations.

PARTICIPANTS

The records included data from patients aged 12-to-<18 years.

INTERVENTIONS

The records belonged to patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic procedures (VATS) who received LB or non-LB analgesia after surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Outcomes included in-hospital postsurgical opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), hospital length of stay (LOS), and total hospital costs; the LB and non-LB cohorts were compared using a generalized linear model with inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance the cohorts. For VATS procedures, pediatric patients receiving LB had significant reductions in in-hospital opioid consumption (632 v 991 MMEs; p < 0.0001), shorter LOS (5.1 v 5.6 days; p = 0.0023), and lower total hospital costs ($18,084 v $21,962; p < 0.0001) compared with those receiving non-LB analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

These results support use of LB in multimodal analgesia regimens for managing pain in pediatric patients after cardiothoracic surgery.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine Hydrochloride for Intercostal Nerve Blockade in Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of liposomal bupivacaine (Lipo-B) and bupivacaine hydrochloride (B-HCl), in the presence of multimodal analgesia, on postoperative analgesia and opioid consumption in minimally invasive thoracic surgery (MITS) lobectomy.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary care cancer center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 60 patients who underwent MITS lobectomy and received intercostal nerve blockade (ICNB) with either 0.66% Lipo-B (n = 29) or 0.5% B-HCl (n = 31).

INTERVENTIONS

All patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the first 12 hours postoperatively, followed by opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as needed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Perioperative opioid and nonopioid consumption and pain scores were compared between groups at 12-hour intervals for the first 72 hours. Between the two groups, there were no statistically significant differences in demographic characteristics, intraoperative (p = 0.46) and postoperative opioid consumption, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores and pain scores upon postanesthesia care unit arrival and after four hours, length of postanesthesia care unit stay (p = 0.84), or length of hospital stay (p = 0.55). Both groups received intra- and postoperative multimodal analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, no differences in opioid consumption or pain scores were observed in the immediate postoperative period following MITS lobectomy between patients given ICNB with Lipo-B and those given ICNB with B-HCl in the presence of multimodal analgesia.

Fifty Percent Reduction in Narcotic Use After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Using Liposomal Bupivacaine

Objective

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery via a right minithoracotomy (RMT) is a common approach to different valve pathologies, tumor resection, and atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. We studied intraoperative field block using liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in these operations.

Methods

Consecutive 171 minimally invasive RMTs (fourth intercostal space) were studied, and patients in cardiogenic or septic shock, intravenous drug abuse, and those re-explored were excluded ( n = 12). An early cohort was treated with standard postoperative analgesia while another underwent intraoperative field block with LB immediately after incision. We compared postoperative pain level, narcotic utilization (morphine milligram equivalent), and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay.

Results

The procedures included 48 isolated mitral valve replacements (MVR); 2 MVR with other procedures; 93 mitral valve repairs (MVRr); 9 MVRr with other procedures; 4 isolated tricuspid valve repairs; 2 myxoma resections; 1 ASD closure. There were 13 patients in the non-LB group and 146 patients in the LB group. Use of LB decreased mean postoperative narcotic utilization by 50% ( P = 0.003). The LB group had lower pain levels on postoperative day 1 ( P = 0.039), which continued through postoperative day 5 ( P = 0.030). We found no difference in ICU or hospital length of stay between groups. There were no complications from LB field block.

Conclusions

LB field block decreases postoperative pain and narcotic utilization after cardiac surgery via a RMT, but it does not reduce length of stay. The technique is safe and should be considered in all patients undergoing RMT cardiac surgery.

Anesthetic considerations in robotic mitral valve surgery

The robotic approach to cardiac surgery offers patients numerous potential advantages compared with a traditional sternotomy approach including shorter hospital length of stay, reduced pain, fewer blood transfusions, and a quicker return to normal daily activities. At the same time, robotic cardiac surgery requires that the anesthesiologist employs several subspecialty skillsets in order to provide optimal care for these patients. Multiple different regional anesthesia techniques may be used to improve analgesia, reduce opioid dosages, and facilitate rapid extubation at the conclusion of the case. Several peripheral cannulation strategies for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) exist and the anesthesia team may assist with percutaneous cannulation of the superior vena cava (SVC) or positioning of an endo-pulmonary vent. Similarly the anesthesiologist may be asked to percutaneously cannulate the coronary sinus for retrograde cardioplegia delivery. The need for one-lung ventilation (OLV) and heavy reliance on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) occupy much of the anesthesiologist's attention during these cases. Variations in institutional practice exist. Reviews of current practice and future studies may help refine the anesthetic approach to robot-assisted cardiac surgery.